Addictive Behaviors
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/addictbeh
H I GH L IG H T S
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Background: Psychiatric patients have high tobacco use prevalence, dependence, and withdrawal severity. A
Nicotine replacement therapy tobacco-free psychiatric hospitalization necessitates the management of nicotine withdrawal (NW) for tobacco
Nicotine withdrawal using patients. NW management often requires the provision of approved nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to
Tobacco treatment patients, which may also motivate tobacco users towards cessation. However, few studies have examined the
Psychiatric hospital
associations between providing NRT, motivation to quit, and NW among psychiatric patients.
Objective(s): To examine the associations between providing NRT at admission and motivation to quit smoking
and severity of NW symptoms.
Design: A retrospective review of the medical records of 255 tobacco using patients on whom NW was assessed
during their hospital stay. The time when NRT was provided (i.e., at admission vs. not provided vs. on the unit),
motivation to quit smoking, and 8-item Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale were assessed.
Results: The primary NW symptom was ‘craving’ (65.1%); reporting of ‘anxiety’ varied by psychiatric diagnosis.
Providing NRT at admission was not associated with motivation to quit. Patients receiving NRT on the unit (i.e.,
delayed receipt) had significantly higher NW than those who received NRT at admission. In multivariate ana-
lyses, receiving NRT on the unit was significantly associated with greater NW severity (β = .19, p = .002).
Conclusions: Among psychiatric patients, providing NRT at admission is associated with greater severity of NW.
The provision of NRT for NW management may be considered as standard practice during tobacco-free psy-
chiatric stays. Future studies may consider the effect of other tobacco treatment medications (such as vareni-
cline, bupropion) on managing NW.
1. Introduction 2014; Kalman, Morissette, & George, 2005; Michopoulos et al., 2015)
This alarming prevalence persists(Centers for Disease Control and
Tackling tobacco use among people with mental illnesses (MI) re- Prevention, 2013; Lê Cook et al., 2014) despite declining tobacco use
mains critical to public health.(Prochaska, Das, & Young-Wolff, 2017) rates in the U.S.(Jamal et al., 2016; U.S. Department of Health and
About 36%–75% of adults receiving mental healthcare services cur- Human Services, 2014); resulting in disproportionate morbidity and
rently use tobacco.(Chandra et al., 2005; Diaz et al., 2009; FCRd et al., mortality among people with MI.(Bandiera, Anteneh, Le, Delucchi, &
⁎
Corresponding author at: University of Kentucky College of Nursing, 315 College of Nursing Building Lexington, KY 40536-0232, USA.
E-mail addresses: ctokol1@uky.edu (C.T.C. Okoli), ydal222@uky.edu (Y.D. Al-Mrayat), charles.shelton1@uky.edu (C.I. Shelton), Milan.Khara@vch.ca (M. Khara).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.005
Received 13 December 2017; Received in revised form 5 June 2018; Accepted 6 June 2018
$YDLODEOHRQOLQH-XQH
(OVHYLHU/WG$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
Demographic, hospitalization history, and tobacco use: 4.2% (n = 115) refused NW assessment and 72.3% (n = 1231) could
Demographics obtained from the medical records included sex, age, not be assessed due to the severity of their psychiatric symptoms, being
ethnicity/race, education, substance use history, and primary psy- unavailable at the time of the TT nurse visit, and short length of stay
chiatric diagnoses (based on International Classification of (i.e., < 3 days, 38.1%). Of the remaining 356 assessments, 28.4%
Diagnoses 10th edition that were determined by the attending (n = 101) were repeated evaluations on the same person (due to re-
psychiatrist during hospitalization). Also, we obtained information peated admissions in the year). To reduce potential confounding, the
on prior hospitalizations and length of hospital stay, and current final sample was based on 255 individuals with single admissions.
tobacco products used by the patients. Because of the variety of Among the 255 assessments, 5.5% did not respond to the Stage of
products, non-cigarette products were converted to cigarette pack Change questions; 3.9%, 4.3%, and 4.3% did not respond to the im-
equivalents such that 1 can/tin of moist tobacco was equivalent to portance, confidence, and readiness to quit smoking questions respec-
2.5 packs (i.e., 30 cigarettes/day equivalent),(Agaku & Alpert, tively; and 2.0% did not report tobacco product use. Those who lacked
2016) 1 cigar was equivalent to 4 cigarettes,(Anantharaman, responses primarily had a psychotic disorder. Because of the low
Chabrier, Gaborieau, et al., 2014) and, conservatively, 1 can of chew number of missing values, for each missing response, a modal or mean
tobacco was equivalent to 1 pack. response was used to replace missing values.
Timing of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): The time at which Sample demographics were described using frequencies (N) with
NRT was first provided to patients was categorized as ‘at admission’ percentages (%) for nominal and ordinal variables and means (M) with
vs. ‘not provided’ vs. ‘on the unit’ (i.e., after admission, but before standard deviations (SD) for interval/ratio data. Differences in patient
discharge). Patients were offered either 2 mg gum, 14 mg patch, demographics, hospitalization history, motivation to quit, and NW se-
21 mg patch or a combination, daily, during their stay. However, the verity by psychiatric disorder categorizations were examined using chi-
actual total dose or frequency of NRT used by patients was not square tests for nominal and ordinal variables and Analysis of Variance
measured. Nineteen patients (7.5%) refused NRT and were included (ANOVA) with Levene's test for equality of variance or Kruskal-Wallis
in the ‘not provided’ category. In addition, we assessed the length of tests for interval/ratio data. Furthermore, differences in motivation to
time between admission and the documented date when patients quit and NW scores by when NRT was provided to patients were ex-
received NRT in days. amined using ANOVA's; whereas differences in Stage of Change by re-
ceiving NRT at admission were examined using chi-square analyses. To
2.5. Motivation to quit limit the risk for type 1 errors as a result of multiple tests within in-
dividual NW symptoms, we applied a Bonferroni correction by setting a
Information on patient motivation to quit tobacco was obtained significance level of .006 (i.e., alpha = .05 divided by 8 individual
with two measures as follows: symptom tests).
Finally, multiple linear regression analyses were employed to ex-
1) The motivational ruler(Boudreaux et al., 2012; Rollnick, Butler, & amine factors associated with NW severity (i.e., total score of MNWS).
Stott, 1997) is based on a three-item measure asking patients about For the regression analyses, a two-step model building process was
their perceived ‘importance’, ‘confidence’, and ‘readiness’ to quit employed.(Hosmer & Lemeshow, 2000) First, univariate associations
smoking/using tobacco, each on a scale from ‘0’ (not at all) to ‘10’ were examined between demographic, hospitalization history, moti-
(very much). vation to quit, and when NRT was provided to patients and the main
2) The Stage of Change in tobacco use cessation was measured by a outcome variables. Then all variables associated with NW severity (at
single item. Those not thinking about quitting in the next six months α = .05) in the first step, were entered into a final model. Model fit for
were categorized as ‘pre-contemplators’; those thinking about quit- the multiple linear regression analysis was determined by the Adjusted
ting in the next six months were categorized as ‘contemplators’; those R2 and related F-test. Data were analyzed with and without the im-
preparing to quit in the next month were categorized as ‘preparers’; putations to determine whether there were any significant differences
and those who had quit within the last six months were categorized in the models. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistics
as in ‘action’.(Prochaska & Velicer, 1997) Due to the low variability version 23.
in some of the categories (i.e., pre-contemplators = 60.4%, con-
templators = 19.6%, Preparers = 14.9% and action = 5.1%), for
analysis, the pre-contemplators and contemplators were categorized 3. Results
into ‘pre-contemplator/contemplator” and the preparers and those
in action were categorized into ‘preparers/action’. Similar categor- 3.1. Sample description
izations have been performed in other recent studies.(Figueiró,
Barros, Ferigolo, & Dantas, 2017; Kumar, Tiwari, Gadiyar, Gaunkar, The mostly male and white sample (mean age = 42 years), pri-
& Kamat, 2018) marily had a high school or greater education. Psychotic disorders were
the most frequent diagnosis and a majority of the sample had a past
2.6. Minnesota nicotine withdrawal scale (MNWS) history of substance use. Cigarettes were the primary tobacco products
used (Mean = 23 cigarette equivalents/day). On average, participants
The MNWS is an 8-item questionnaire that assesses NW symptoms had 1.4 prior hospitalizations (average length of stay = 16 days). Sixty-
based on the DSM-IV criteria.(American Psychiatric Association, 1994; eight percent received NRT at admission, and 57.3% were provided
Hughes & Hatsukami, 1986) These self-reported items included crav- with 21 mg or more of patch. The average length of time between ad-
ings for tobacco, depressed mood, insomnia, anger/irritability, anxiety, mission and being assessed for NW was 4.6 (SD = 4.9) days. Nearly
poor concentration, restlessness, and change/loss in appetite. These three-quarters reported at least one NW symptom; ‘cravings’ were the
symptoms are scored on a scale of ‘0’ (not present), ‘1’ (slight), ‘2’ most prevalent and ‘insomnia’ the least reported symptom (Fig. 1).
(mild), ‘3’ (moderate), and ‘4’ (severe). A summary score was calculated As compared to other groups, those with depressive/anxiety dis-
with a possible range of 0 to 32. The MNWS scale demonstrated ade- orders had higher education; those with cognitive disorders were older,
quate internal consistency (α = .76). had greater NW frequency, and fewer prior hospitalizations; and those
with substance use disorders had the shortest length of stays, the least
2.7. Data analysis time between receiving NRT and NW assessment, and the highest NW
severity (Table 1).
Of all admissions in 2016 (N = 2751), 61.9% were tobacco users;
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
3.2. Motivation to quit smoking and receiving NRT at admission admission. But, as compared to those not provided NRT at admission,
those provided NRT on the units had higher mean scores on craving
The sample had moderate average scores on importance (M = 6.2, (χ2 = 10.1 [DF = 1], p = .001), depression (χ2 = 4.6 [DF = 1],
SD = 4.1) but low confidence (M = 3.8, SD = 4.2) and readiness p = .032), anger (χ2 = 4.8 [DF = 1], p = .029), anxiety (χ2 = 11.8
(M = 3.0, SD = 4.1) to quit. Individuals with substance use disorders [DF = 1], p = .001), and restlessness (χ2 = 8.1 [DF = 1], p = .005);
had the highest average scores on importance (M = 7.3, SD = 3.7), only craving, anxiety, and restlessness were significantly different after
confidence (M = 4.3, SD = 4.4) and readiness (M = 4.6, SD = 4.7); applying Bonferroni corrections. However, as compared to those pro-
those with cognitive disorders had the lowest average scores on im- vided NRT at admission, those provided NRT on the units did not have
portance (M = 5.3, SD = 4.0), confidence (M = 2.9, SD = 3.7) and any significant differences after applying the Bonferroni corrections.
readiness (M = 2.1, SD = 3.8) to quit. These scores did not significantly In bivariate linear regression analysis, variables associated with NW
differ across psychiatric diagnoses groups. There were no significant severity included being white (vs. non-white), being provided NRT on
differences in motivation for quitting by receiving NRT at admission the unit (vs. being provided NRT at admission), providing 21 mg of NRT
groups. (vs. none), being in the pre-contemplation/contemplation Stage of
Most of the sample were in the pre-contemplation/contemplation Change (vs. action/preparation), shorter duration of time between
Stages of Change (80%). Those with substance use disorders were most when patient was admitted and NRT was provided, greater cigarette
likely to be in the preparation/action stages and those with cognitive equivalents per day, and lower confidence in quitting. In multivariate
disorders were the least likely (30% vs. 0%); but the differences be- regression analysis, when regressing the NW severity on significant
tween psychiatric disorder groups were non-significant (χ2 = 12.4 variables from the bivariate analysis, being provided NRT on the units
[DF = 12], p = .411). There were no significant differences in Stage of (vs. being provided NRT at admission) and lower confidence in quitting
Change by receiving NRT at admission groups. remained significantly associated with greater NW severity (Adjusted
R2 = .12, F = 4.86 [9, 245], p < .0001) (Table 3). We performed this
3.3. Nicotine withdrawal symptom severity and psychiatric diagnosis analysis with and without the imputed missing values and there were
no significant differences in model parameters.
Summing across NW symptoms, the sample reported low levels of
NW (M = 3.2, SD = 4.2); with the highest scores on cravings (M = 1.9, 4. Discussion
SD = 1.7), then anger (M = 0.3, SD = 0.8), then anxiety (M = 0.3,
SD = 0.7) and restlessness (M = 0.3, SD = 0.8), then depressed mood We assessed the relationship between providing NRT at admission,
(M = 0.2, SD = 0.7), then appetite (M = 0.2, SD = 0.6), and then poor motivation to quit tobacco, and NW severity. Although providing NRT
concentration (M = 0.1, SD = 0.5) and insomnia (M = 0.1, SD = 0.5) was not associated with motivation to quit, on-unit NRT provision was
(see Table 2). NW symptom severity differed among psychiatric diag- associated with decreased NW severity. These associative findings may
nosis groups in anger (χ2 = 12.4 [DF = 4], p = .014), anxiety have explained the overall low ratings of NW in the sample, given that
(χ2 = 15.0 [DF = 4], p = .005), and poor concentration (χ2 = 9.4 the majority of patients were offered NRT at admission or on the unit
[DF = 4], p = .052); but these differences were only significant for (80.3%). However, caution must be taken in inferring any causal re-
‘anxiety’ when applying Bonferroni corrections. lationship from these findings. Nonetheless, they may be important for
tobacco policy and evidence-based practice within psychiatric facilities.
3.4. Nicotine withdrawal symptom severity and receiving NRT at admission Failing to address NW may impede clinical management of hospitalized
smokers with serious MI.(Benowitz et al., 2009; Kobayashi et al., 2010;
NW severity scores for patients provided NRT on the units were Tsopelas, Kardaras, & Kontaxakis, 2008)
significantly higher than for both those provided and not provided NRT We found NW symptom severity score differences by psychiatric
at admission (χ2 = 14.8 (DF = 2), p = .001) (Fig. 2). In post hoc ana- diagnoses in anger, anxiety, and poor concentration. This finding sup-
lysis, there were no significant mean differences in any NW symptom ports an earlier study reporting that anxiety or nervousness may be
severity scores between those provided NRT or not provided NRT at important indicators of NW among people with depressive/anxiety
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
Table 1
Differences in sample characteristics by psychiatric diagnosis categorizations.
Total (N = 255) Adjustmentc (n = 20) Cognitivec (n = 16) Depressive/Anxietyc Psychoticc (n = 98) Substance usec
(n = 81) (n = 40)
N % n % n % n % n % n %
M SD m sd m sd m sd m sd m sd
Age (in years)⁎ 42.1 14.1 40.1 15.0 50.3 20.3 40.6 13.6 44.1 12.7 37.7 13.3
# of prior hospitalizations⁎⁎ 1.4 3.5 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.3 1.2 2.9 2.2 4.4 0.6 2.9
Length of hospital stay (days)⁎⁎⁎ 16.2 28.3 20.4 57.5 32.5 39.8 8.8 7.9 22.4 31.0 7.7 8.4
Assessment time frame (days)⁎⁎ 4.6 4.8 4.4 5.8 7.2 6.5 3.5 3.4 5.8 5.5 3.2 2.1
Cigarette equivalent per day 23.7 16.7 26.2 16.8 19.5 11.0 23.9 19.5 22.5 14.6 26.6 16.9
MNWS total score⁎ 3.2 4.2 3.8 5.6 2.0 1.4 3.9 4.7 2.4 3.4 4.1 4.8
Differences between groups are based on chi-square analyses for categorical and ordered-categorical variables and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA, with Levene's Test
for Equality of Variance) for continuous variables; however, for continuous variables that did not demonstrate Equality of Variance, Kruskal-Wallis Tests were
employed.
a
Of those using chew/moist tobacco, 3 individuals concurrently used cigarettes. The individuals who used a pipe also used cigarettes.
b
One individual was offered 2 mg gum at admission and was added to the 14 mg group; 2 individuals were provided 42 mg on the unit and were added to the
21 mg group.
c
The psychiatric diagnoses are classified into adjustment disorder group (including 16 with adjustment, 1with a personality disorder, and 1 with a conversion
disorder, and 1 with malingering, cognitive disorder group) (including 11 with a cognitive disorder like Alzheimer's or dementia, 3 with a medical illness like
Huntington's disease, and 2 with an unspecified mental health problem with cognitive features), depressive/anxiety group (6 with anxiety disorders like generalized
anxiety, 25 with major depressive disorder, 24 with unspecified mood disorder, and 26 with bipolar disorder), psychotic (including 30 with unspecified psychosis and
68 with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder), and substance use disorder (4 with alcohol & sedative hypnotics, 1 with cannabis, 9 with cocaine or other
stimulants, and 26 with poly-substance use).
⁎
p < .05.
⁎⁎
p < .01.
⁎⁎⁎
p < .001.
disorders.(Smith et al., 2014) In fact, our current analysis found that NW symptoms by psychiatric groups.
‘anxiety’ scores from the MNWS significantly differed across psychiatric Recent research suggests that providing NRT at admission is un-
diagnoses groups. This finding may suggest that NW symptoms can be related to motivation to quit tobacco.(Leyro et al., 2013) This lack of
experienced differentially among psychiatric diagnoses. To optimize association may be explained by low confidence and readiness to quit,
treatment, future studies may assess the salience and/or specificity of based on our current analysis. However, it could indicate that
Table 2
Differences in MNWS symptoms by psychiatric diagnosis categorizations.
Cravings Depressive Insomnia Anger Anxietya Concentration Restlessness Appetite
Psychiatric diagnoses m sd m sd m sd m sd m sd m sd m sd m sd
Adjustment and malingering 1.6 1.9 0.4 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.2
Cognitive and altered mental status 1.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.8
Depressive/Anxiety 2.2 1.7 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.5 1.1 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.7
Psychotic 1.5 1.6 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.5
Substance use 2.2 1.7 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.7
Differences between groups on symptom scores are based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA, with Levene's Test for Equality of Variance) for continuous variables;
however, for continuous variables that did not demonstrate Equality of Variance, Kruskal-Wallis Tests were employed.
a
Significant differences between groups in the table are based on applying Bonferroni corrections (alpha = .006).
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
Fig. 2. Mean MNWS scores by time of receiving NRT (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 12.7 (DF = 2)), p = .002.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
severity in our study and that by Soyster et al. may be due to the dif- smoking urges on days immediately prior to smoking relapse. Nicotine & Tobacco
ferences in measures employed in the studies. In addition, our relatively Research, 10(1), 35–45.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental dis-
smaller sample size may have increased the risk for type 2 errors. Fu- orders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
ture, adequately powered, studies may re-examine the measures em- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental dis-
ployed in our current study in addition to others shown to be associated orders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Anantharaman, D., Chabrier, A., Gaborieau, V., et al. (2014). Genetic variants in nicotine
with NW severity. addiction and alcohol metabolism genes, oral Cancer risk and the propensity to
A few important limitations should be considered in interpreting smoke and drink alcohol: A replication study in India. PLoS One, 9(2), e88240.
our findings. As a retrospective review, some variables were unavail- Anthenelli, R. M., Benowitz, N. L., West, R., et al. (2016). Neuropsychiatric safety and
efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without
able that may have affected the results of our study. For example, we psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled
did not have information on psychiatric symptom severity (such as clinical trial. The Lancet, 387(10037), 2507–2520.
using the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale(Eisen, Normand, Bader, P., Mcdonald, P., & Selby, P. (2009). An algorithm for tailoring pharmacotherapy
for smoking cessation: Results from a Delphi panel of international experts. Tobacco
Belanger, Spiro, & Esch, 2004)) which is associated with NW severity.
Control, 18(1), 34–42.
(Soyster et al., 2016) In addition, as a cross-sectional analysis, we did Bandiera, F. C., Anteneh, B., Le, T., Delucchi, K., & Guydish, J. (2015). Tobacco-related
not assess changes in NW symptoms over the course of the hospitali- mortality among persons with mental health and substance abuse problems. PLoS
zation, thus no causality can be inferred. In a related issue, the as- One, 10(3), e0120581.
Benowitz, N. L., Schultz, K. E., Haller, C. A., Wu, A. H. B., Dains, K. M., & Jacob, P. (2009).
sessment of NRT provided at admission and on the unit was based on Prevalence of smoking assessed biochemically in an urban public hospital: A ratio-
program records, with no determination that the patient actually used nale for routine cotinine screening. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(7),
the NRT. Furthermore, the categorizations of the psychiatric disorders 885–891.
Bittoun, R., Nynycz, S., Ross, D., Foley, K., & Ross, L. (2013). A protocol for a smoke-free
was based on the primary discharge diagnosis; we did not have in- mental health facility. Journal of Smoking Cessation, 8(1), 57–59.
formation on comorbid psychiatric disorders, which may have had an Boudreaux, E. D., Sullivan, A., Abar, B., Bernstein, S. L., Ginde, A. A., & Camargo, C. A.
effect on main outcomes. Finally, our sample was based on a con- (2012). Motivation rulers for smoking cessation: A prospective observational ex-
amination of construct and predictive validity. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice,
venience sample of only 15% of current tobacco users admitted to the 7(1), 8.
hospital. This low sample proportion limits the generalizability of the Breslau, N., Kilbey, M., & Andreski, P. (1992). Nicotine withdrawal symptoms and psy-
current findings to other similar populations. Future, adequately pow- chiatric disorders: Findings from an epidemiologic study of young adults. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 149(4), 464–469.
ered, robust studies employing longitudinal designs should be con- Carrillo, S., Nazir, N., Howser, E., et al. (2017). Impact of the 2015 CMS inpatient psy-
sidered to better understand the effect of providing NRT at admission chiatric facility quality reporting rule on tobacco treatment. Nicotine & Tobacco
on NW symptoms among diverse patient populations with psychiatric Research, 19(8), 976–982.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Vital signs: Current cigarette smoking
disorders.
among adults aged ≥18 years with mental illness — United States, 2009—2011.
During tobacco-free hospitalizations, tobacco-using patients may be Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(05), 81–87.
assessed for NW and provided appropriate treatment to mitigate pos- Chandra, P. S., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., Jairam, K. R., Girish, N. S., & Rudresh, H. P.
sible discomfort. Our findings suggest an association between providing (2005). Prevalence and correlates of tobacco use and nicotine dependence among
psychiatric patients in India. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1290–1299.
patients with NRT at admission and lowered NW severity. Not ad- CMS (2016). Inpatient psychiatric facility quality reporting program manual.
dressing NW may confound the clinical inpatient management of Diaz, F. J., James, D., Botts, S., Maw, L., Susce, M. T., & de Leon, J. (2009). Tobacco
people with serious MI.(Kobayashi et al., 2010; Leyro et al., 2013; smoking behaviors in bipolar disorder: A comparison of the general population,
schizophrenia, and major depression. Bipolar Disorders, 11(2), 154–165.
Tsopelas et al., 2008) These findings support current governmental Eisen, S. V., Normand, S.-L., Belanger, A. J., Spiro, A. I., & Esch, D. (2004). The revised
policies that require the provision of TT in inpatient psychiatric facil- behavior and symptom identification scale (BASIS-R): Reliability and validity.
ities.(Carrillo et al., 2017; CMS, 2016) Nonetheless, to enhance TT, Medical Care, 42(12), 1230–1241.
FCRd, B., Melo, A. P. S., Cournos, F., Cherchiglia, M. L., Peixoto, E. R. M., & Guimarães,
future longitudinal studies are needed to examine the time-course of M. D. C. (2014). Cigarette smoking among psychiatric patients in Brazil. Cadernos de
NW after admission. These studies can better provide treatment Saúde Pública, 30(6), 1195–1206.
guidelines on the length of time needed for NRT administration to Figueiró, L. R., Barros, H. M. T., Ferigolo, M., & Dantas, D. C. M. (2017). Assessment of
factors related to smokers' adherence to a short-term support group for smoking
manage NW. Such studies can enhance emerging tobacco control po-
cessation: A longitudinal study in a developing country. Trends in Psychiatry and
licies and treatment approaches that target the reduction of the dis- Psychotherapy, 39(1), 19–28.
parate tobacco use morbidity and related mortality among people with Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Hughes, J. (2008). An algorithm for choosing among smoking cessation treatments.
MI.
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34(4), 426–432.
Hughes, J. R., & Hatsukami, D. (1986). Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal.
Author disclosure/conflict of interest Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(3), 289–294.
Jamal, A., Brian, A. K., Linda, J. N., Whitmill, J., Stephen, D. B., & Corinne, M. G. (2016).
Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2015. MMWR.
The authors have no financial relationships with commercial in- Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65.
terests with regard to this manuscript. Kalman, D., Morissette, S. B., & George, T. P. (2005). Co-morbidity of smoking in patients
with psychiatric and substance use disorders. The American Journal on Addictions,
14(2), 106–123.
Author roles in research/writing of manuscript Kobayashi, M., Ito, H., Okumura, Y., Mayahara, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Hirakawa, J. (2010).
Hospital readmission in first-time admitted patients with schizophrenia: Smoking
C. Okoli conceived, planned, and drafted the methods, results, and patients had higher hospital readmission rate than non-smoking patients. The
International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 40(3), 247–257.
discussion sections of the manuscript. Y. Al-Mrayat drafted the in- Kumar, A., Tiwari, A., Gadiyar, A., Gaunkar, R. B., & Kamat, A. K. (2018). Assessment of
troduction and assisted in the methods section. C. Shelton contributed readiness to quit tobacco among patients with oral potentially malignant disorders
to advanced interpretation of data, reviewed and revised the manu- using transtheoretical model. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7(1), 9.
Lawn, S., & Pols, R. (2003). Nicotine withdrawal: Pathway to aggression and assault in
script critically for important intellectual content. M. Khara contributed
the locked psychiatric ward? Australasian Psychiatry, 11(2), 199–203.
intellectually to drafts of the manuscript. All authors approved the final Lê Cook, B., Wayne, G., Kafali, E., Liu, Z., Shu, C., & Flores, M. (2014). Trends in smoking
manuscript as submitted. among adults with mental illness and association between mental health treatment
and smoking cessation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(2), 172–182.
Leyro, T. M., Hall, S. M., Hickman, N., Kim, R., Hall, S. E., & Prochaska, J. J. (2013).
References Clinical Management of Tobacco Dependence in inpatient psychiatry: Provider
practices and patient utilization. Psychiatric Services, 64(11), 1161–1165.
Agaku, I. T., & Alpert, H. R. (2016). Trends in annual sales and current use of cigarettes, Lindson-Hawley, N., Thompson, T. P., & Begh, R. (2015). Motivational interviewing for
cigars, roll-your-own tobacco, pipes, and smokeless tobacco among US adults, smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, Cd006936.
2002–2012. Tobacco Control, 25(4), 451–457. McLaughlin, I., Dani, J. A., & De Biasi, M. (2015). Nicotine withdrawal. The neuro-
Allen, S. S., Bade, T., Hatsukami, D., & Center, B. (2008). Craving, withdrawal, and pharmacology of nicotine dependence. Springer99–123.
Michopoulos, I., Rizos, E., Gournellis, R., Karvouni, A., Kotsioumpa, I., & Douzenis, A.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C.T.C. Okoli et al. $GGLFWLYH%HKDYLRUV²
(2015). Smoking reduction in psychiatric inpatients is feasible: Results from a 12- Siru, R., Hulse, G. K., & Tait, R. J. (2009). Assessing motivation to quit smoking in people
month prospective study. Annals of General Psychiatry, 14(1), 4. with mental illness: A review. Addiction, 104(5), 719–733.
Nguyen, K. H. (2016). State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking and smo- Smith, P. H., Homish, G. G., Giovino, G. A., & Kozlowski, L. T. (2014). Cigarette smoking
keless tobacco use among adults—United States, 2014. MMWR. Morbidity and and mental illness: A study of nicotine withdrawal. American Journal of Public Health,
Mortality Weekly Report, 65(39), 1045–1051. 104(2), e127–e133.
Ortiz, G., & Schacht, L. (2015). Smoking ban implementation in psychiatric inpatient Soyster, P., Anzai, N. E., Fromont, S. C., & Prochaska, J. J. (2016). Correlates of nicotine
hospitals: Update and opportunity for performance improvement. J Fam Med, 2(5), withdrawal severity in smokers during a smoke-free psychiatric hospitalization.
1039. Preventive Medicine, 92, 176–182.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: Tobacco smoking ces- Stockings, E. A., Bowman, J. A., Prochaska, J. J., et al. (2014). The impact of a smoke-free
sation in adults, including pregnant women: Behavioral and pharmacotherapy interven- psychiatric hospitalization on patient smoking outcomes: A systematic review.
tions. (2015). https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/ Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48(7), 617–633.
UpdateSummaryFinal/tobacco-use-in-adults-and-pregnant-women-counseling-and- Taylor, G., Mcneill, A., Girling, A., Farley, A., Lindson-Hawley, N., & Aveyard, P. (2014).
interventions1 (Accessed February 25th, 2017). Change in mental health after smoking cessation: Systematic review and meta-ana-
Prochaska, J. J. (2011). Smoking and mental illness — breaking the link. New England lysis. British Medical Journal, 348.
Journal of Medicine, 365(3), 196–198. Thomas, M., & Richmond, R. (2017). Addressing the arguments against implementation
Prochaska, J. J., Das, S., & Young-Wolff, K. C. (2017). Smoking, mental illness, and public of smoke-free policies in psychiatric facilities. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health
health. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 1.1–1.21. Nursing, 24(5), 322–331.
Prochaska, J. J., Gill, P., & Hall, S. M. (2004). Treatment of tobacco use in an inpatient Tsopelas, C., Kardaras, K., & Kontaxakis, V. (2008). Smoking in patients with psychiatric
psychiatric setting. Psychiatric Services, 55(11), 1265–1270. disorders: Effects on their psychopathology and quality of life.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki, 19(4), 306–312.
change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38–48. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). The health consequences of
Rigotti, N. A., Clair, C., Munafò, M. R., & Stead, L. F. (2012). Interventions for smoking smoking-50 years of progress: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: US
cessation in hospitalised patients. The Cochrane Library, 1–74. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Rigotti, N. A., Tindle, H. A., Regan, S., et al. (2016). A post-discharge smoking-cessation Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,
intervention for hospital patients: Helping hand 2 randomized clinical trial. American Office on Smoking and Health17.
Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(4), 597–608. Vangeli, E., Stapleton, J., Smit, E. S., Borland, R., & West, R. (2011). Predictors of at-
Roberts, E., Eden Evins, A., Mcneill, A., & Robson, D. (2016). Efficacy and tolerability of tempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: A
pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults with serious mental illness: A sys- systematic review. Addiction, 106(12), 2110–2121.
tematic review and network meta-analysis. Addiction, 111(4), 599–612. West, R., Hajek, P., & Belcher, M. (1989). Severity of withdrawal symptoms as a predictor
Rohsenow, D. J., Tidey, J. W., Kahler, C. W., Martin, R. A., Colby, S. M., & Sirota, A. D. of outcome of an attempt to quit smoking. Psychological Medicine, 19(4), 981–985.
(2015). Intolerance for withdrawal discomfort and motivation predict voucher-based Williams, J. M., Steinberg, M. L., Griffiths, K. G., & Cooperman, N. (2013). Smokers with
smoking treatment outcomes for smokers with substance use disorders. Addictive behavioral health comorbidity should be designated a tobacco use disparity group.
Behaviors, 43, 18–24. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1549–1555.
Rollnick, S., Butler, C. C., & Stott, N. (1997). Helping smokers make decisions: The en- Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R. (2009).
hancement of brief intervention for general medical practice. Patient Education and Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: Factors associated with success or failure from
Counseling, 31(3), 191–203. the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addictive Behaviors, 34(4), 365–373.
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Health Sciences Center - New Orleans from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 07, 2018.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2018. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.