Anda di halaman 1dari 38

lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Summary - book "Basic Marketing Research", lectures 1-6,


chapters 1-11

Marketing Research (University of Western Australia)

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

MKTG  2305  Chapter  1  Summary  


Learning  Objectives  
• Definition  and  classification  of  marketing  research  
• The  role  of  marketing  research  in  decision  making  
• The  marketing  research  process  
• Marketing  research  in  practice  
• Ethics  in  marketing  research  

Definition  of  Marketing  Research  


• Marketing  research  is  the  systematic  and  objective  identification,  collection,  analysis,  dissemination  and  use  of  
information  that  is  undertaken  to  improve  decision  making  related  to  identifying  and  solving  problems  (also  known  as  
opportunities)  in  marketing  
• Marketing  research  has  a  broad  scope  
• Marketing  research  begins  with  the  identification  or  definition  of  the  research  problem  of  opportunity:  Problems  lead  
to  opportunities  
• The  range  of  data  collection  methods  and  the  sources  used  to  obtain  the  data  vary  in  sophistication  and  complexity.  
• The  methods  used  depend  on  the  specific  requirements  of  the  project  including  budget  and  time  constraints  
• The  data  is  then  analysed  and  the  results  are  formally  presented  to  the  client  and  used  in  decision  making  
• Market  research  is  systematic:  it  follows  a  predictable  path  

A  Classification  of  marketing  research  


• Problem  Identification  Research:  research  undertaken  to  help  identify  problems  which  are  not  necessarily  apparent  on  
the  surface  and  yet  exist  or  are  likely  to  arise  in  the  future  
• More  common  of  the  two  types  of  research  
• Used  to  assess  the  environment  and  diagnose  problems-­‐  provides  an  initial  alert  to  potential  opportunities  or  problems  
→ Market  potential  research  
→ Market  share  research  
→ Image  research  
→ Market  characteristics  research  
→ Forecasting  research  
→ Business  Trends  Research  
→ Eg.  Ralph  Lauren  undertakes  research  to  determine  the  size  of  the  market  for  men’s  shirts  
• Problem  Solving  Research:  research  undertaken  to  help  solve  specific  marketing  problems.  Undertaken  once  a  problem  
or  opportunity  has  been  identified  
→ Segmentation  research  
→ Pricing  Research  
→ Product  Research  
→ Promotional  Research  
→ Distribution  Research  
• Both  types  compliment  each  other  and  are  often  combined  
• E.g.  MacDonald’s  discovered  in  store  atmosphere  was  increasingly  becoming  an  important  part  of  diner  experience  
(problem  identification)  and  the  solution  was  an  introduction  of  the  “forever  young”  brand  by  remodeling  restaurants  
(problem  solving)  

The  role  of  marketing  research  in  marketing  


decision  making  >>  
• A  major  goal  of  marketing  is  to  identify  and  
then  satisfy  needs  of  various  customer  
groups.  
• To  do  this  marketing  managers  need  
information  about  the  various  customer  
groups,  competitors  and  other  forces  such  
as  environmental  trends  in  the  
marketplace.  
• The  task  of  marketing  research  is  to  assess  
the  information  needs  and  provide  
management  with  relevant,  accurate,  
reliable,  valid  and  current  information  to  
aid  marketing  decision  making  
  1  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

• Used  for  competitive  advantage  and  too  avoid  high  costs  of  poor  decisions  

The  consequences  of  marketing  research  done  poorly  or  not  done  at  all  
• Branding  mistakes  
• International  marketing  failures  
• Ill  advised  new  product  introductions  
• Nintendo-­‐  underestimated  demand  
• IBM-­‐  overestimated  demand  
• Other  examples  

The  Marketing  Research  Process  


1.Defining  the  problem  
• Occurs  through  discussion  with  decision  makers,  interviews  
with  industry  experts,  analysis  of  secondary  data  including  
social  media,  and  perhaps  some  qualitative  research  such  as  
focus  groups  
• Management  decision  problem  (what  should  the  management  
do)  
• Marketing  Research  problem  (what  information  is  needed)  
 
2.Developing  an  approach  to  the  problem  
• Formulating  an  analytical  framework  and  models,  research  questions  and  hypotheses  
 
3.Formulating  a  research  design  
• A  framework  or  blueprint  for  the  marketing  research  project-­‐  details  procedures  to  obtain  information  
• Conducting  preliminary  or  exploratory  research,  designing  the  variables,  ad  designing  appropriate  scales  to  measure  
them  
• Issue  of  how  data  must  be  obtained  from  respondents  
 
4.Doing  fieldwork  or  collecting  data  
• Fieldwork  involves  personal,  telephone,  mail  or  electronic  interviewing.  
• Proper  selection,  training,  supervision  and  evaluation  of  the  field  force  are  essential  to  ensure  high  quality  data  
collection.  
 
5.  Preparing  and  Analyzing  Data  
• Data  preparation  includes  the  editing,  coding  and  transcribing  of  collected  data-­‐  then  verified  for  accuracy  and  
standardized  
• Analyzed  using  different  statistical  techniques-­‐  results  are  then  interpreted  to  find  conclusions  related  to  the  marketing  
research  problem  
 
6.Preparing  and  Presenting  the  report  
• Entire  project  should  be  documented  in  a  written  report  that  addresses  the  specific  research  question,  describes  the  
approach,  the  research  design,  data  collection  and  data  analysis  procedures  and  presents  the  results  and  major  
findings.  
• Written  report  is  usually  supplemented  by  tables,  figures  and  graphs  to  enhance  clarity  and  impact    
• Formal  presentation  

Key  points  to  note  


• Each  step  in  the  process  involves  numerous  issues  and  decisions  
• All  steps  are  necessary  and  vital  
• The  steps  are  not  rigid  (feedback  and  revision)  
• But…  once  data  is  collected  no  revision  of  the  procedure  is  possible  
• Errors  can  arise  at  any  stage,  affected  quality  of  output  
• Errors  must  be  considered  in  ‘Total’,  rather  than  in  isolation  

The  Decision  to  Conduct  Marketing  Research  


• Should  be  guided  by  a  number  of  considerations  including:  
→ Managements  attitude  towards  the  research:  should  be  positive  
→ The  resources  available  to  conduct  the  research  and  to  implement  the  findings:  should  be  adequate  
→ If  additional  information  is  needed  to  make  the  decision:  yes  
→ If  the  decision  is  of  strategic  or  tactical  importance:  yes  
  2  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ The  costs  versus  the  benefits  of  conducting  the  research:  benefits  outweigh  

Overview  of  the  marketing  research  industry  


• Marketing  Research  industry:  consists  of  suppliers  who  provide  marketing  research  services.  Made  up  of  internal  and  
external  suppliers  
• Internal  Supplier:  marketing  research  departments  located  within  a  firm  (e.g.  large  firms  Coca-­‐Cola,  Colgate)  
• External  suppliers:  outside  marketing  research  companies  hired  to  conduct  a  complete  marketing  research  project  or  a  
component  of  it  (E.g.  Neilson)  
→ Full-­‐service  suppliers:    companies  that  offer  the  full  range  of  marketing  research  activities  
o Syndicated  services:  companies  that  collect  and  sell  common  pools  of  data  designed  to  serve  the  
information  needs  of  multiple  clients  
o Customized  services:  companies  that  tailor  research  procedures  to  best  meet  needs  of  each  client  
o Internet  services:  companies  that  specialized  in  conducting  research  on  the  internet  
→ Limited-­‐service  suppliers:  companies  that  specialized  in  one  or  a  few  steps  of  the  marketing  research  process  
o Field  services:  companies  whose  primary  service  offering  is  their  expertise  in  collecting  data  for  
research  projects  
o Focus  groups  and  qualitative  services:  services  related  to  facilities,  recruitment,  and  other  services  for  
focus  groups  and  other  forms  of  qualitative  research,  such  as  one-­‐on-­‐one  depth  interviews  
o Technological  and  analytical  services:  services  related  to  design  issues  and  computer  analysis  of  
quantative  data,  such  as  those  obtained  in  large  surveys  
• International  suppliers  
• Diagram  page  47  

Selecting  a  Research  Supplier  


• What  is  the  suppliers  reputation  
• Does  the  firm  complete  projects  on  schedule?  Is  it  flexible?  
• Is  it  known  for  maintaining  ethical  standards?  
• Are  its  research  projects  of  high  quality?  
• What    kinds  and  how  much  experience  does  the  supplier  have?  
• Has  the  firm  had  experience  with  projects  similar  to  this  one?  
• Do  the  supplier’s  personnel  have  both  technical  and  nontechnical  expertise?  Do  they  have  Professional  Researcher  
Certification  offered  by  the  Marketing  Research  Association?  
• Has  the  firm  formed  any  strategic  alliances?  What  Resources  does  it  have  access  to?  

Preparation  for  a  Career  in  Marketing  Research  


• Take  all  the  marketing  courses  you  can  
• Take  courses  in  statistics  and  quantitative  methods  
• Acquire  the  internet  and  computer  skills  
• Take  courses  in  psychology  and  consumer  behaviour  
• Acquire  effective  written  and  verbal  communication  skills  
• Think  creatively.  Creativity  and  common  sense  command  a  premium  in  market  research  

Current  influences  on  the  marketing  research  process  


• The  internet  and  electronic  commerce  
→ Both  primary  and  secondary  data  
• Gatekeeper  Technologies  and  Privacy  Legislation  
→ For  example,  called  ID,  answering  devices,  opt-­‐in/opt-­‐out,  etc  
• The  Expansion  of  Global  Markets  
→ Are  different  approaches  required  in  new  markets  
• Marketing  Research  as  a  Strategy  
→ Need  to  integrate  more  fully  with  IT  function  (e.g.  CRM)  
• Timely  market  research  has  become  more  valuable  
→ Need  to  be  able  to  keep  up  with  the  speed  of  new  products  entering  the  marketplace,  domestic  and  
international  competition  and  the  increase  in  demanding  and  well-­‐informed  consumers    

Predicted  Trends  in  MR/  Contemporary  issues  


1. Outsourcing  of  marketing  research  to  international  agencies  particularly  in  the  US:  international  marketing  
research  is  much  more  complex  that  domestic  research  because  researchers  must  consider  the  environment  in  the  
international  markets  they  are  researching  
2. Social  media  are  emerging  as  an  important  domain  in  which  to  conduct  marketing  research:  Greater  use  of  mixed-­‐
methods    

  3  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

3. Ethical  issues  in  marketing    involve  4  stake  holders  


• Market  research  reports  becoming  more  interactive  and  moving  online  http://ww.uniqlo.com/try  
• Increased  in-­‐house  management  of  research  projects  
• Continuing  international  expansion  of  market  research  companies  

Ethics  in  marketing  research:  the  researcher  


• Ethical  questions  arise  when  conflict  occurs  between  the  following  stakeholders  
1. The  marketing  researcher  
2. The  client  
3. The  respondent  
4. The  public  
• Ethical  issues  can  arise  at  each  step  of  the  marketing  process  
• Some  “nasties”  to  keep  an  eye  out  for  
→ Manipulating  variable  costs  to  increase  the  project  price  
→ Not  providing  promised  incentives  to  respondents  
→ Respondent  abuse  (e.g.  the  five  minute  interview)  
→ Selling  unnecessary  research  services  
→ Falsifying  response  data  
→ Duplicating  actual  response  data  
→ Manipulating  data  structures  to  get  a  biased  result  
→ Not  reporting  selected  findings  at  all  

Summary  diagram:  page  54  

Ethics  in  Marketing  Research:  the  client  


• Clients  can  be  unethical  too,  for  example:  
→ Asking  for  a  “detailed  proposal”  from  several  providers  with  no  intention  of  awarding  any  of  them  a  contract  
→ Promising  long-­‐term  commitment  and  future  business  in  order  to  get  a  reduced  price  for  the  current  project  

Ethics  in  Marketing  Research:  the  Respondent  


• Ask  yourself,  how  many  times  have  I…  
→ Provided  dishonest  answers  to  an  interviewer?  
→ Alluded  to  and/or  faked  behaviour  I  would  never  engage  in?  
→ Been  purposely  inconsistent  in  my  responses  to  mess  up  the  research  endeavour?  
→ Been  purposely  “extreme”  in  my  responses  to  a  survey?  
→ Been  purposely  rude  and/or  crude  in  providing  my  responses  to  a  research  endeavour?  

Marketing  Research  Associations  Online  


• AMSRS:  Australian  Market  and  Social  Research  Society  (www.amsrs.com.au)  
• ESOMAR:  European  Society  for  Opinion  and  Marketing  Research  (www.esomar.nl)  
• MRS:  The  Market  Research  Society  (UK)  (www.marketresearch.org.uk)  
• PMRS:  The  Professional  Marketing  Research  Society  (Canada)  (www.pmrs-­‐aprm.com)  

Acronym  
The  role  and  salient  characteristics  of  marketing  research  can  be  described  by  RESEARCH  
• R  ecognition  of  information  needs  
• E  ffective  decision  making  
• S  ystematic  and  objective  
• E  xodus/  dissemination  of  information  
• A  nalysis  of  information  
• R  eccomendations  for  action  
• C  ollection  of  information  
• H  elpful  to  managers  
 
 
 
 
 

  4  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

MKTG  2305  Chapter  2  Summary:  Defining  the  Market  Research  


Problem  and  Developing  an  Approach  
Learning  Objectives  
• Understand  the  problem  definition  process  
• Know  the  difference  between  management  and  
marketing  research  problems  
• Understand  how  to  develop  an  appropriate  research  
approach  
• Be  able  to  identify  the  component  of  a  research  design  
• Recognize  the  differences,  strengths  and  limitations  of  
exploratory  and  conclusive  research  
• Understand  the  general  outline  and  contents  of  a  market  
research  proposal  (examples  on  LMS)  

The  Problem  Definition  and  Approach  Development  Process>>  


TASKS  INVOLVED  
• Discussions  with  decision  makers:  the  researcher  must  
understand  the  nature  of  the  management  decision  
problem  as  well  as  the  management’s  expectations  of  
the  research-­‐  gives  the  researcher  an  opportunity  to  establish  achievable  expectations.  
→ Discussions  with  the  decision  maker  can  be  structured  around  the  problem  audit:  a  comprehensive  
examination  of  a  marketing  problem  to  understand  its  origin  and  nature.  
• Interviews  with  industry  experts:  experts  found  both  inside  and  outside  the  firm,  that  can  help  researchers  formulate  
the  marketing  research  problem  
→ Experience  survey/  key-­‐informant  technique:  interviews  with  people  knowledgeable  about  the  general  topic  
being  investigated  
→ Leader-­‐user  survey:  survey  that  involves  obtaining  information  from  the  lead  users  of  technology.  
• Secondary  Data  Analysis:  
→ Secondary  data:  data  collected  for  some  purpose  other  than  the  one  at  hand  
→ Primary  Data:  data  originated  by  the  researcher  to  address  the  research  problem  
→ Analyzing  secondary  data  should  always  precede  primary  data  collection  and  can  provide  valuable  insights  into  
the  problem  situation  and  lead  to  the  identification  of  innovative  courses  of  action.  
• Qualitative  and  Exploratory  Research:  undertaken  to  gain  a  clear  understanding  of  factors  underlying  the  research  
problem  
→ Qualitative  research:  an  unstructured,  exploratory  research  methodology  based  on  small  samples  intended  to  
provide  insight  and  understanding  of  the  problem  setting  
 
ENVIRONMENTAL  CONTEXT  OF  THE  PROBLEM  
• Factors  that  have  an  impact  on  the  definition  of  the  marketing  research  problem,  including:  
→ Past  information  and  forecasts  
→ Resources  and  constraints  of  the  firm  
→ Objectives  of  the  decision  maker  
→ Buyer  behaviour  
→ Legal  environment  
→ Marketing  and  technological  skills  of  the  firm  

Step  One:  Defining  the  Problem  


• Problem  Definition:  a  broad  statement  of  the  
general  problem  and  identification  of  the  specific  
components  of  the  marketing  research  problem.  
• Researchers  and  key  decision  makers  on  the  
clients  side  should  agree  on  the  definition  of  the  
problem.  
• Incorrect  definition  leads  to  incorrect  solutions.  
This  can  be  minimised  by  adopting  a  two-­‐stage  
process  
1. Broad  statements  of  the  problem:  the  
initial  statement  of  the  marketing  
  5  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

research  problem  that  provides  an  appropriate  perspective  on  the  problem  
2.
Specific  components  of  the  problem:  The  specific  components  focus  on  the  key  aspects  of  the  problem  and  
provide  clear  guidelines  on  how  to  proceed.  
• Common  errors:  problem  definition  is  too  broad  or  is  too  narrow  
• Problems  arise  from  3  main  sources:  
1. Unanticipated  change:  e.g.  research  into  lost  market  change,  employee  turnover  is  high  
2. Planned  change  (  4  P’s):  e.g.  research  into  which  of  two  new  prototypes  is  going  to  be  more  sucessful  
3. Serendipity  in  the  form  of  new  ideas  
o Research  assists  in  the  development  (e.g.  Viagra  was  initially  used  for  heart  issues)  
• Symptoms  are  not  problems  

Parts  of  the  Problem  


Part  A:  Management  Problem  (ACTION  based-­‐  question;  focuses  on  symptoms)  
• The  problem  confronting  the  decision  maker.  It  asks  what  the  decision  maker  needs  to  do  
→ Decision  facing  management  when  a  range  of  solutions  are  available  
→ It  asks  what  the  decision  maker  wants  to  do  
o How  do  we  know  if  our  products  are  meeting  customer’s  needs?  
o Is  our  ad  campaign  reaching  the  right  audience?  
• Problem  definition  based  on  symptoms  can  be  misleading>>  
• Example:  What  packaging  should  we  develop  for  a  new  product>  
 
Part  B:  Marketing  Research  Problem  (INFORMATION  based-­‐  statement,  focuses  on  the  underlying  causes)  
• Statements  about  problem  areas  that  the  research  will  attempt  to  investigate;    
• The  marketing  research  problem  asks  what  information  is  needed  and  how  it  can  be  best  obtained  
• Translates  the  Management  Problem  into  what  the  researchers  need  to  do…  the  problem  facing  the  researcher  
• May  include  hypotheses:  statistical  
• It  is  ‘actionable’,  very  broad,  can  start  with  evaluate,  assess,  determine  
• Best  identified  through  research,  knowledge  and  consultation  
• Example:  Evaluate  the  effectiveness  of  alternate  packaging  designs  

Step  two:  Approach  to  the  problem  


• Analytical  Framework  and  Model  
• Research  Questions  and  Hypotheses  
• Specification  of  the  Information  Needed  

Analytical  Framework  and  Model  


• Objective  evidence:  marketing  research  should  be  based  on  this;  It  is  unbiased  
evidence  that  is  supported  by  empirical  findings  from  secondary  sources  
• Analytical  model:  an  explicit  specification  of  a  set  of  variables  and  their  
interrelationships  designed  to  represent  some  real  system  or  process  in  whole  of  
in  part  
1. Verbal  model:  analytical  models  that  provide  a  written  representation  of  the  relationship  between  variables  
2. Graphical  model:  analytical  models  that  provide  a  visual  picture  of  the  relationship  between  variables.  They  
are  used  to  isolate  variables  and  to  suggest  directions  of  relationships  but  are  not  designed  to  provide  
numerical  results  
3. Mathematical  models:  analytical  models  that  explicitly  describe  the  
relationships  between  variables;  usually  in  equation  form  
→ Where  y=  degree  of  preference  
→ Ao  and  A1=  model  parameters  to  be  estimated  statistically  
→ Xi=  independent  variable  

Research  Questions  and  Hypothesis  


• Research  Question:  Refined  statements  of  the  specific  components  of  the  problem.  They  are  designed  to  ask  the  
specific  information  required  to  address  each  problem  component.  E.g.  What  are  the  effects  of  age  and  gender  on  
purchases  of  Coca-­‐Cola  
• Hypothesis:  an  unproven  statement  or  proposition  about  a  factor  or  phenomenon  that  is  of  interest  to  the  researcher.  
It  may  be  a  tentative  statement  about  the  relationships  discussed  in  the  theoretical  framework  or  represented  in  the  
analytical  model.  They  hypothesis  can  be  stated  as  an  answer  to  the  research  question.  
• Hypothesis  1:  Consumers  aged  17-­‐24  buy  more  Coca-­‐Cola  in  a  weekly  basis  than  25-­‐30  year  olds  
→ Independent  Samples  t  test:  mean  figure  of  expenditure  on  Coke  of  two  groups,  and  compare  them  

  6  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ One  tailed  t  test:  one  group  buys  more  


• Hypothesis  2:  Males  buy  more  Coca-­‐Cola  on  a  weekly  basis  than  females  

Specification  by  information  needed  


• By  focusing  on  each  component  of  the  problem,  the  analytical  
framework  and  models,  and  the  research  question  and  hypotheses,  
the  researcher  can  determine  what  information  should  be  obtained  
• Researchers  should  specify  which  information  should  be  collected  for  
each  component  of  the  problem.  

Steps  Leading  to  the  Formulation  of  a  Research  Design  >>  

Acronym  
Factors  to  consider  when  analyzing  the  environmental  context  of  the  problem  can  be  summed  up  as  PROBLEM  
• P  ast  information  and  forecasts  
• R  esources  and  constraints  
• O  bjectives  of  the  decision  maker  
• B  uyer  behaviour  
• L  egal  environment  
• E  conomic  environment  
• M  arketing  and  technological  skills  
 
MKTG  2305  Chapter  3  Summary:  Research  Design  
Step  3:  Tasks  involved  in  a  Research  Design  

 
What  is  a  research  design  
• Research  design:  a  framework  or  blueprint  for  conducting  the  marketing  research  project  that  specifies  the  procedures  
necessary  to  obtain  the  information  needed  to  structure  and/or  solve  the  marketing  research  problem.  
• A  good  research  design  ensures  that  the  information  collected  will  be  relevant  and  useful  to  management  and  that  all  
of  the  necessary  information  will  be  obtained-­‐  process  is  effective  and  efficient.  

Basic  Research  Designs  

Exploratory  Research  
• Exploratory  Research:  A  type  of  research  design  that  has  as  its  primary  objective  the  provision  is  insights  into  and  
comprehension  of  the  problem  situation  confronting  the  researcher  
→ Used  when  management  realises  a  problem  exists  but  does  not  yet  understand  why  (e.g.  sales  are  slipping  in  a  
particular  region)  
→ Exploratory  research  is  conducted  on  small  and  nonrepresentative  sample,  so  the  findings  should  be  regarded  
as  tentative  and  followed  by  more  defined  exploratory  research  or  conclusive  research  
• It  can  be  used  for:  
1. To  formulate  a  problem  or  define  a  problem  more  precisely  
2. To  identify  alternative  courses  of  action  
3. To  develop  hypotheses  
4. To  isolate  key  variables  and  relationships  for  further  examination  

  7  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

5. To  gain  insights  for  developing  an  approach  to  the  problem  


6. To  establish  priorities  for  further  research  
• Types:  
1. Survey  of  experts/  experience  surveys  
2. Pilot  Surveys:  surveys  that  tend  to  be  less  structured  than  large-­‐scale  surveys  in  that  they  generally  
contain  more  open-­‐ended  questions  and  the  sample  size  is  much  smaller  (chap  2)  
3. Case  Studies:  Involve  an  intensive  examination  of  a  few  selected  cases  of  the  phenomenon  of  interest/  
Cases  could  be  customers,  stores  or  other  units.  (chap  2)  
4. Secondary  data  analyzed  in  a  qualitative  way  (discussed  in  Chapter  4),  can  include  social  media  content  
5. Qualitative  research  (discussed  in  Chapter  6):  such  as  focus  groups,  one-­‐on-­‐one  in  depth  interviews,  social  
networks  and  social  media  bulletin  boards.  
• Exploratory  used  when:  want  more  understanding  of  numbers  and  conclusive  research,  if  you  want  some  insights  fast,  
low  cost  and  when  you  don’t  need  to  generalize  to  a  population,  shouldn’t  be  used  to  make  key  marketing  decisions  
due  to  sample  size  error  
• Example:  6  focus  groups  with  10  respondents  are  conducted  on  body  moisturizer  effectiveness  

Conclusive  Research  
• Conclusive  Research:  is  research  designed  to  assist  the  decision  maker  in  determining,  evaluating  and  selecting  the  best  
course  of  action  for  a  given  situation;  used  in  strategic  marketing  decisions  
• It  is  based  on  the  assumption  that  the  researcher  has  an  accurate  understanding  of  the  problem  at  hand.  
• The  objective  is  to  test  specific  hypotheses  and  examine  specific  relationships  
• Can  move  between  exploratory  and  conclusive  research  or  do  both  at  once  e.g.  the  findings  from  secondary  data  and  
focus  groups  (exploratory  research)  were  further  tested  in  a  telephone  survey  (conclusive  research)  
• Conclusive  used  when:  when  managers  need  to  make  key  strategic  decisions,  and  need  to  generalize  the  data  to  the  
market  as  a  whole  
• Example:  large  national  survey  of  1000  randomly  selected  respondents  on  body  moisturiser  
• Conclusive  Research  can  be  broken  down  into  two  sub-­‐types:  
1. Descriptive  Research  
2. Causal  Research  

Descriptive  Research  
• Descriptive  Research:  a  type  of  conclusive  research  hat  has  its  major  objective  in  the  description  of  something-­‐  usually  
market  characteristics  or  functions.  Descriptive  research  goals  include:  
1. To  develop  a  profile  of  a  target  market  
2. To  estimate  the  frequency  of  product  use  as  a  basis  for  sales  forecasts  
3. To  determine  the  relationships  between  product  use  and  perception  of  product  characteristics  
4. To  determine  the  degree  to  which  marketing  variables  are  associated  
• Example:  Swatch  watchers  does  an  analysis  of  its  own  sales  by  outlet  type  or  undertakes  consumer  perception  and  
behaviour  studies.  
• Major  types  of  descriptive  studies:  
1. Sales  studies:  market  potential,  market  shares,  sales  analysis  
2. Consumer  perception  and  behaviour  studies:  image,  product  usages,  advertising,  pricing  
3. Market  characteristic  studies:  distribution,  competitive  advantage  
• Techniques  for  data  collection  of  descriptive  research:  
→ Secondary  data  analyzed  in  a  quantitative  as  opposed  to  a  qualitative  manner:  including  social  media  
(discussed  in  Chapters  4  and  5)  
→ Surveys:  an  interview  with  a  larger  number  of  respondents  using  a  predesigned  questionnaire  (Chapter  7)    
→ Panels  (Chapters  5  and  7)  
→ Observational  and  other  data  (Chapter  7)  
• Cross-­‐sectional  design:  a  type  of  research  design  involving  the  one  time  collection  of  information  from  any  given  
sample  of  population  elements  (e.g.  How  did  the  Americans  rate  the  performance  of  Barack  Obama  immediately  
following  the  election?)  
→ Good  at:  representative  sampling,  response  bias  
→ Bad  at:  detecting  change,  large  amount  of  data  collection,  accuracy  
• Longitudinal  design:  two  or  more  measurements  on  the  same  variables  are  obtained  from  a  given  group  of  
respondents  at  different  points  in  time  (e.g.  How  did  the  American  people  change  their  view  of  Obama’s  performance  
before  and  after  his  first  year  in  office?)  
→ The  term  panel  is  used  interchangeable  with  longitudinal  design:  consists  of  a  sample  of  respondents,  
generally  households  that  have  agreed  to  provide  information  at  specified  intervals  over  an  extended  period.  
→ Good  at:  detecting  change,  large  amount  of  data  collection,  accuracy  
→ Bad  at:  Representative  sampling,  representative  bias  
  8  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Causal  Research  
• Causal  research:  a  type  of  conclusive  research  whose  major  objective  is  to  obtain  evidence  regarding  cause-­‐and-­‐effect  
(causal)  relationships  
• Causal  design:  a  design  in  which  the  independent  variables  are  manipulated  in  a  relatively  controlled  environment  
• Example:  Examining  the  effect  of  a  promotional  campaign  on  the  sales  of  Mercedes  cars-­‐  simulate  a  shopping  trip,  
other  factors  are  controlled  (e.g.  product  quality  and  price)  
• It  is  appropriate  for  the  following  purposes:  
1. To  understand  which  variables  are  the  cause  (independent  variables)  and  which  variables  are  the  effect  
(dependent  variables)  of  a  phenomenon  
2. To  determine  the  nature  of  the  relationship  between  causal  variables  and  the  effect  to  be  predicted  
• METHOD:  experiments  

Summary  of  Differences  


• Exploratory:  Why  are  we  losing  market  share?  
• Descriptive:  How  do  consumers  evaluate  our  brand  compared  to  competing  brands?  
• Causal:  By  how  much  will  our  sales  increase  if  we  decrease  the  price  by  5,10  or  15%?  
• The  following  are  guidelines  for  choosing  research  designs:  
1. Exploratory-­‐  Conclusive:  when  little  is  known  about  the  problem  situation,  begin  with  exploratory  to  generate  
alternative  courses  of  action,  research  questions  or  hypothesis.  Then  move  on  to  descriptive  or  causal  research  
2. Conclusive:  If  the  researcher  has  a  good  understanding  of  the  problem  situation,  descriptive/causal  research  is  
an  appropriate  initial  step  (e.g.  Quarterly  customer  satisfaction  surveys)  
3. Conclusive-­‐  Exploratory:  used  when  descriptive  or  causal  research  leads  to  results  that  are  unexpected  or  
difficult  to  interpret,  the  researcher  may  turn  to  exploratory  research  for  insight.  

  Exploratory   Conclusive   Causal  


Objectives   To  provide  insight  and   To  test  specific  hypothesis  and   Determine  cause-­‐and-­‐effect  
understanding   examine  relationships   relationships  
Characteristics   Information  needed  is  defined  only   Information  needed  is  clearly   Manipulation  of  one  or  
  loosely   defined   more  independent  
Research  process  in  flexible  and   Research  process  is  formal  and   variables  
unstructured   structured   Control  of  other  mediating  
Sample  is  small  and   Sample  is  large  and  representative   variables  
nonrepresenative   Data  analysis  is  quantative  
Analysis  of  primary  data  is   Marked  by  the  prior  formulation  
qualitative   of  specific  hypotheses  
Often  the  front  end  of  the  total   Preplanned  and  structured  design  
research  design  
Findings/Results   Tentative   Conclusive    
Outcome  of  Research   Used  for  insight   Used  for  Strategic  Decisions    
Methods   Expert/experience  surveys   Secondary  data:  quantative   Experiments  
Pilot  surveys   Surveys  
Case  studies   Panels  
Secondary  data:  qualitative  analysis   Observational  and  other  data  
and  qualitative  research  

Tasks  Involved  in  formulating  a  research  design  


1. Specify  the  information  needed  (Chapter  2)  
2. Design  the  exploratory,  descriptive  and/or  causal  phases  of  the  research  (Chapters  4  through  8)  
3. Specify  the  measurement  and  scaling  procedures  (Chapters  9  and  10)  
4. Construct  and  pretest  a  questionnaire  or  an  appropriate  form  for  data  collection  (Chapter  11)  
5. Specify  the  sampling  process  and  sample  size  (Chapters  12  and  13)  
6. Develop  a  plan  of  data  analysis  (Chapter  15)  

Acronym  
The  process  of  a  research  design  may  be  summarized  by  the  acronym  DESIGN:  
• D  ata  analysis  plan  
• E  xploratory,  descriptive,  causal  design  
• S  caling  and  measurement  
• I  nterviewing  forms:  questionnaire  design  
• G  enerating  the  needed  information  
• N  umber:  sample  size  and  plan  

  9  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

MKTG  2305  Chapter  4  Summary:  Exploratory  Research  Design  and  


Secondary  Data  
Learning  Objectives  
• Knowledge  of  the  various  types,  sources  and  uses  of  secondary  data  
• Understand  the  differences  between  primary  and  secondary  data  and  qualitative  and  quantative  research  
• Understand  the  major  forms  of  qualitative  research  
• Understand  the  major  forms  of  qualitative  research-­‐focus  groups,  in-­‐depth  interviews  and  projective  techniques  

Primary  versus  secondary  data  


• Primary  Data:  data  originated  by  the  researcher  for  the  specific  purpose  of  addressing  the  research  problem.  Can  be  
expensive  and  time  consuming  because  it  involves  all  6  steps  of  the  marketing  research  process  (e.g.  a  company  
conducts  research  into  the  demographics  of  its  consumers)  
  Primary  Data   Secondary  Data  
Collection  purpose   For  the  problem  at  hand   For  other  problems  
Collection  process   Very  involved   Rapid  and  easy  
Collection  cost   High   Relatively  low  
Collection  time   Long   Short  
 

Secondary  Data  
• Secondary  data:  data  collected  for  some  purpose  other  
than  the  problem  at  hand.  
• Researchers  should  favour  secondary  data  before  going  
ahead  with  their  own  primary  data-­‐  only  if  the  secondary  
data  sources  have  ben  exhausted  or  yield  marginal  returns  
• Uses  of  secondary  data  include:  
1. Identify  the  problem  
2. Better  understand  and  define  the  problem  
3. Develop  an  approach  to  the  problem  
4. Formulate  an  appropriate  research  design  (e.g.  by  
identifying  the  key  variables)  
5. Answer  certain  research  questions  and  test  some  
hypotheses  
6. Interpret  primary  data  with  more  insight  
• Advantages:  useful  for  estimating  demand,  monitoring  the  environment,  developing  business  intelligence  systems,  
segmenting  and  targeting.  
• Disadvantages:  limited  by  the  degree  of  fit  with  the  current  research  problem,  data  accuracy,  methods  used  to  collect  
data  may  not  be  compatible  with  current  situation,  compatibility  of  units  of  measurement  or  timeframe.  
• A  classification  of  secondary  data  >>  

Criteria  used  for  Evaluating  Secondary  Data  


Criteria   Description   Issues   Remarks  
Specifications   Methodology  used  to   Data  collection  method   Data  should  be  reliable,  valid  
collect  data   Response  rate   and  generalizable  to  the  
Quality  of  data   problem  at  hand  
Sampling  technique  
Sample  size  
Questionnaire  design  
Fieldwork  
Data  Analysis  
Error   Accuracy  of  the  data   Examine  errors  in:  approach,  research   Assess  accuracy  by  comparing  
design,  sampling,  data  collection,  data   data  from  different  sources  
analysis,  reporting  
Currency   When  the  data  was   Time  lag  between  collection  and  publication   Census  data  are  periodically  
collected   Frequency  of  updates   updated  by  syndicated  firms  
Objective   The  purpose  for  the   Why  were  the  data  collected?   The  objective  will  determine  
study   the  relevance  of  the  data  
Nature   The  content  of  the  data   Definition  of  key  variables   Reconfigure  the  data  to  
Units  of  measurement   increase  their  usefulness,  if  
  10  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Categories  used   possible  


Relationships  examined  
Dependability   How  dependable  are  the   Expertise,  credibility,  reputation  and   Data  should  be  obtained  from  
data   trustworthiness  of  the  source   an  original  rather  than  an  
acquired  source  
 

Internal  Secondary  Data  


• Internal  data:  data  available  within  the  organization  for  which  the  research  is  being  conducted  
• Favour  internal  secondary  data  before  external  
• Usually  takes  considerable  processing  effort  before  such  data  can  be  used  
• Sources  of  internal  Data:  
1. Customer  Databases:  obtains  psychographics  of  customers.  Information  on  customer  demographics  is  
obtained  from  raw  sales  information,  warranty  cards  and  loyalty  programs  etc.  
2. Data  Warehousing  and  Data  mining:  
o Data  warehousing:  a  centralized  database  that  consolidates  company-­‐wide  data  from  a  variety  of  
operational  systems  
o Data  mining:  technique  involving  the  use  of  powerful  computers  and  advanced  statistical  and  other  
software  to  analyze  large  databases  in  order  to  discover  hidden  patterns  in  the  data  
3. CRM  and  Data  base  marketing  
o Customer  Relationship  Management:  a  decision  support  system  that  is  used  for  managing  the  
interactions  between  an  organisation  and  its  customers.  (e.g.  prerecorded  technical  assistance  
hotline)  
o Database  marketing:  the  practice  of  using  CRM  databases  to  develop  relationships  and  highly  
targeting  marketing  efforts  with  individuals  and  customer  groups  
4. Social  Media  
→ Sales  and  expense  records  
→ Previous  Research  reports  
→ Customer  Relationship  Management  systems  
→ Customer  complaints  
→ Internal  information  on  external  players  such  as  supplier  reports  

External  Secondary  Data  


• External  Data:  data  that  originates  external  to  the  organization;  grown  over  the  years  due  to  introduction  of  computers  
into  workplace  
• Types:  
1. Social  Media  
2. Business/non-­‐government:  guides,  indices,  directories,  statistical  data  (e.g.  Standard  &  Poor’s  Corporate  
descriptions-­‐  summary  data  on  publically  held  US  corporations)  
3. Government:  census  data  (e.g.  ABS)  
4. Syndicated  Services:  information  services  offered  by  marketing  research  organizations  that  provide  
information  from  a  common  database  to  firms  that  subscribe  to  their  services    
→ Can  merge  internal  customer  data  with  external  geographic,  demographic  and  lifestyle  data  on  the  
same  customers  (geodemograhpic  coding)  

Syndicated  Sources  Example:  ACNielsen  ScanTrack  


• ACNielson  used  diary  panels  (consumers  made  diary  entries),  now  customers  can  scan  in  products  they  buy  
• ScanTrack  monitors  key  accounts  for  food  and  groceries  and  can  provide  information  on  the  product  level  
• Monitors  supermarket  trends  by  product,  category  and  geography.  Allows  users  (companies)  to:  
→ Evaluate  performance  trends  
→ Evaluate  price  and  promotion  effectiveness  
→ Evaluate  their  position  in  relation  to  competitors  
• Provides  information  on:  
→ Market  (total  key  account  and  also  chain  specific)  
→ Product  (category,  manufacturer,  brand  and  product  level)  
→ Volume  and  value  sales  
→ Selling  price  and  market  share  

Acronym  
The  criteria  used  for  evaluating  secondary  data  can  be  described  by  the  acronym  SECOND  
• Specifications:  methodology  used  to  collect  the  data  

  11  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

• Error:  accuracy  of  data  


• Currency:  when  the  data  was  collected  
• Objective:  purpose  for  which  data  were  collected  
• Nature:  content  of  the  data  
• Dependability:  overall,  how  dependable  are  the  data  
 

MKTG  2305  Chapter  5  Summary:  Exploratory  Research  Design:  


Syndicated  Sources  of  Secondary  Data  
The  nature  of  Syndicated  data  
• Syndicated  sources:  companies  that  collect  and  sell  common  pools  of  data  designed  to  serve  information  needs  by  a  
number  of  clients,  including  competing  firms  in  the  same  industry.  (E.g.  Survey  data  collected  by  the  NPD  Group  on  the  
rising  trend  of  casual  clothing  assisted  Haggar  Apparel  and  Levi  Strauss  direct  their  marketing  campaigns.)  
• These  data  differ  from  primary  data  in  that  the  research  objective  guiding  the  study  is  common  to  several  client  firms.  
• Syndicated  firms  make  their  money  by  collecting  data  and  designing  research  products  that  fit  the  information  needs  of  
more  than  one  organisation.  
• Timely  and  cost  effective;  impartial  monitor  of  market-­‐wide  trends  as  well  as  consumer  reactions  or  behaviours  
• Syndicated  sources  can  be  classified  based  on  the  unit  of  measurement:  
1. Households/consumers  
2. Institutions  

Overview  of  syndicated  services:  from  households/consumers  


Type   Characteristic   Advantages   Disadvantages   Uses  
Surveys   Surveys  conducted  at   Most  flexible  way  of   Interviewer  errors;   Market  
regular  intervals   obtaining  data;  information   respondent  errors   segmentation;  
on  underlying  motives   advertising  theme  
selection;  advertising  
effectiveness  
Purchase  panels   Households  provide   Recorded  purchase   Lack  of   Forecasting  sales,  
specific  information   behaviour  can  be  lined  to   representativeness;   market  share  and  
regularly  over  an   the   response  bias;   trends;  establishing  
extended  period  of   demographic/psychographic   maturation   customer  profiles  and  
time;  respondents   characteristics   brand  loyalty  and  
asked  to  record   switching;  evaluating  
specific  behaviours  as   test  markets,  
they  occur   advertising  and  
distribution  
Media  panels   Electronic  devices   Same  as  purchase  panels   Same  as  panel   Establishing  
automatically  record   purchases   advertising  rates;  
behaviour,   selecting  media  
supplemented  by  a   program  or  air  time;  
diary   establishing  viewer  
profiles  
Scanner  volume-­‐   Household  purchases   Data  reflect  actual   Data  may  not  be   Price  tracking,  
tracking  data   are  recorded  through   purchases;  timely  data;  less   representative;  errors   modeling  assessing  
electronic  scanners  in   expensive   in  recording   effectiveness  of  in-­‐
supermarkets   purchases;  difficult  to   store  promotion  
link  purchases  to  
elements  of    
marketing  mix  other  
than  price  
Scanner  panels  with   Scanner  panels  of   Data  reflect  actual   Data  may  not  be   Promotional-­‐mix  
Cable  TV   households  that   purchases;  sample  control;   representative;  quality   analyses;  copy  
subscribe  to  cable  TV   ability  to  link  panel  data  to  of  data  limited   testing;  new  product  
  household  characteristics   testing;  positioning  
Audit  services   Verification  of   Relatively  precise   Coverage  may  be   Measuring  consumer  
product  movement  by   information  at  the  retail  and   incomplete;  matching   sales,  market  share,  
examining  physical   wholesale  levels   of  data  on  competitive   and  competitive  
records  or  performing   activity  may  be   activity;  analyzing  
inventory  analysis   difficult   distribution  patterns  
  12  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

tracking  of  new  


products  
Firm  syndicated   Data  banks  on   Important  source  of   Data  is  lacking  in   Determining  market  
services   industrial   industrial  firms;  particularly   terms  of  content,   potential  by  
establishments   useful  in  initial  phases  of   quantity  and  quality   geographic  area;  
through  direct   the  marketing  research   defining  dales  
inquiries  of   process   territories;  allocating  
companies,  clipping   advertising  budget  
services  and  
corporate  reports  
 

Overview  of  syndicated  services:  from  institutions  


• Retailer  and  wholesaler  audits:  a  data  collection  process  derived  from  physical  records  or  inventory  analysis.  Data  are  
collected  personally  by  the  researcher  or  by  representatives  of  the  researcher,  and  the  data  are  based  upon  counts,  
usually  of  physical  objects  
• Industrial  firms/  organisations:  secondary  data  derived  from  industrial  firms  and  organisational  sources  and  intended  
for  industrial  or  institutional  use:  direct  inquiries,  clipping  services,  corporate  reports  
 
Page  170  diagram  and  page  156  

Acronym  
The  salient  characteristics  of  syndicated  data  may  be  described  by  the  SYNDICATED  
• Surveys  
• Yield  data  of  known  commercial  value  
• Number  of  clients  use  the  data  
• Diary  panels  
• Institutional  services  
• Cost  is  low  
• Audits  
• Timely  and  current  
• Electronic  scanner  services  
• Data  is  combined  from  difference  sources:  single-­‐data  source  
 

MKTG  2305  Chapter  6  Summary:  Exploratory  Research  Design:  


Qualitative  Research  
 

Qualitative  vs.  Quantative  Data  


• Qualitative  Research:  an  unstructured,  exploratory  research  methodology  based  on  small  samples  that  provides  
insights  and  understanding  of  the  problem  setting  
• Quantative  Research:  a  research  methodology:  a  research  methodology  that  seeks  to  quantity  the  data  and  typically  
applies  some  form  of  statistical  analysis    
• Whenever  a  new  marketing  research  problem  is  addressed,  quantitative  research  must  be  preceded  by  appropriate  
qualitative  research  
• Example:  Gillete  used  quantative  research  (survey)  based  on  a  representative  sample  of  500  women  to  substantiate  the  
findings  of  qualitative  research  (in-­‐depth  interviews)  
• The  danger  of  ignoring  qualitative  research  when  the  research  problem  is  not  follow  understood  and  directly  
proceeding  to  quantitative  research  (e.g.  New  Coke-­‐  researchers  were  focusing  on  taste  rather  than  the  emotional  
attachment  consumers  had  forged  with  the  brand,  which  was  actually  a  more  significant  variable  fueling  brand  
preference  and  loyalty  than  taste)  
  Qualitative  Research   Quantitative  Research  
Objective   To  gain  an  understanding  of  the  underlying   To  quantify  the  data  and  generalize  the  results  
reasons  and  motivations   form  the  sample  to  the  population  of  interest  
Sample     Small  numbers  and  nonrepresentative  cases   Large  numbers  and  representative  cases  
Data  Collection   Unstructured   Structured  
Data  Analysis   Nonstatistical   Statistical  
Outcome   Develop  a  richer  understanding   Recommend  a  final  course  of  action  
 
  13  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Advantages  and  Disadvantages  of  Qualitative  


Research  Methods  
• Qualitative-­‐  UNDERSTANDING  things  
→ Very  heavy  emphasis  on  open  ended  
questions  
→ A  lot  of  flexibility-­‐  interview/surveys  
may  adapt  to  issues  presenting  at  the  
time  
→ Observation  (e.g.  watching  people  in  
a  shopping  food  hall)  
• Quantative-­‐  MEASURING  things  
• Advantages:  
→ Very  detailed  
→ Can  come  to  understand  the  
justification  behind  responses  
• Disadvantages:  
→ Difficulty  in  finding  trained/quality  
interviewers  
→ Difficulty  in  finding  available  participants  

A  classification  of  Qualitative  Research  procedures>>  


• Direct  approach:  a  type  of  qualitative  research  in  which  the  purposes  of  the  project  are  disclosed  to  the  respondent  or  
the  obvious  given  the  nature  of  the  interview  
• Indirect  approach:  the  type  of  qualitative  research  in  which  the  purposes  of  the  project  are  disguised  from  the  
respondents.  

Direct  (nondisguised):  

Focus  Groups  
• Focus  groups:  an  interview  conducted  by  a  trained  moderator  among  a  small  group  of  respondents  in  an  unstructured  
and  natural  manner  (e.g.  focus  group  discussion  guide  for  smart  phone,  or  consumer  response  to  Samsung’s  newest  
phone)  
• Main  purpose  is  to  gain  insight  on  issues  of  interest  to  the  researcher  by  listening  to  a  group  of  people  from  the  
appropriate  target  market  
• Value  lies  in  obtaining  rich  information  from  free  flowing  discussions  
• Focus  groups  are  the  most  important  qualitative  research  procedure  
• Synonymous  with  qualitative  research  
• Conducting  a  focus  group  requires:  
1. Design  the  focus-­‐group  environment  
2. Recruit  and  select  focus  group  participants  
3. Select  a  moderator  
4. Prepare  the  discussion  guide  
5. Conduct  the  group  interview  
6. Prepare  the  focus-­‐group  report  
 
Characteristics  of  Focus  Groups  
Group  Size   6-­‐8  respondents  
Group  Composition   Homogenous:  same  gender,  age  group,  user  category  ;  respondents  prescreened  
Physical  Setting   Relaxed,  informal  atmosphere  
Time  Duration   1  to  3  hours  
Recording   Use  of  audio  and  video  recording  
Moderator   Observational,  interpersonal  and  communicational  skills  of  moderator  are  crical  
 
• Moderator  is  key  role:  
→ Well  trained  in  interpersonal  communication  
→ Kind  but  firm  
→ Permissive,  sensitive  
→ Encourage  involvement/understanding  
→ Flexible  
→ Have  a  good  understanding  of  objectives/background  
• Advantages:  
  14  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ The  immediacy  and  richness  of  the  components  


→ Group  interaction  provides  a  wider  range  of  information,  insights  and  ideas  
→ Participants  can  respond  to  one  another’s  comments  and  opinions  in  unexpected  ways  
→ Responses  are  general  spontaneous  and  candid  providing  rich  insights  
→ Ideas  are  more  likely  to  be  novel  and  potentially  creative  
• Disadvantages:  
→ The  clarity  and  conviction  of  members  may  lead  to  a  tendency  for  researchers  and  managers  to  regard  findings  
as  conclusive  rather  than  exploratory  
→ Focus  groups  are  also  difficult  to  moderate  
→ The  quality  of  results  depends  heavily  on  the  skills  of  the  moderator  (which  are  rare)  
→ The  unstructured  nature  of  the  results  makes  coding,  analysis  and  interpretation  difficult  
• Applications  of  focus  groups:  
1. Understand  customer  perceptions,  preferences  and  behaviour  concerning  a  product  category  
2. Obtain  impressions  of  new  product  concepts  
3. Generate  new  ideas  about  older  products  
4. Develop  create  concepts  and  copy  material  for  advertisements  
5. Secure  price  impressions  
6. Obtain  preliminary  consumer  reaction  to  specific  marketing  programs  
7. Interpret  previously  obtained  quantitative  results  

In-­‐Depth  Interviews  
• Depth  interviews:  an  unstructured,  direct  personal  interview  in  which  a  single  respondent  in  probed  by  a  highly  skilled  
interviewer  to  uncover  underlying  motivations,  beliefs,  attitudes  and  feelings  on  a  topic  
• Like  focus  groups,  depth  interviews  are  an  unstructured  and  direct  way  of  obtaining  information.  Unlike  focus  groups,  
however,  depth  interviews  are  conducted  on  a  one-­‐one  one  basis,  these  interviews  typically  last  from  30  minutes  to  
more  than  an  hour.  
• As  the  interview  progresses,  the  type  of  questions  asked,  the  proves  used  and  the  wording  of  the  question  depends  on  
the  answers  received  
• Example:  how  shoppers  view  the  Internet  shopping  experience  
• The  success  of  depth  interviews  rests  with  the  skills  of  the  interviewer  who  should:  
1. Avoid  appearing  superior  and  put  the  respondent  at  ease  
2. Be  attached  and  objective  yet  personable  
3. Ask  questions  in  an  informative  manner  
4. Not  accept  brief  “yes”  or  “no”  answers    
5. Probe  the  respondent  
• Two  basic  types:  
1. Nondirective  interviews  
2. Semi-­‐structured  or  focused  Individual  Interviews  
• Nondirective  interviews:  Maximum  freedom  to  respond  (so  long  as  discussion  is  related  to  area(s)  of  research  interest)  
• Semi  structured  or  focused  individual  interviews:  Covers  a  specific  list  of  topics  or  sub-­‐areas  (e.g.  timing,  exact  
wording,  and  time  allocated  to  each  question  usually  predetermined)  
• Advantages:  
→ Can  uncover  deeper  insights  about  underlying  motivates  than  focus  groups  
→ Can  attribute  the  responses  directly  to  the  respondents  
→ Free  exchange  of  information-­‐  focus  groups  may  inflict  social  pressure  to  conform  
→ Probing  allows  the  information  on  complex  issues  to  be  found  
• Disadvantages:    
→ Need  a  highly  trained  interviewers-­‐  expensive  and  hard  to  find  
→ Results  are  susceptible  to  the  interviewers  influence,  quality  of  results  is  dependent  on  their  skill  
→ Hard  to  decipher  the  results  
→ Time  Consuming    
→ Small  sample  may  not  be  representative  of  the  larger  population  
Characteristic   Focus  Group   In-­‐depth  Interview  
Group  synergy  and  dynamics   +   -­‐  
Peer  pressure/  group  influence   -­‐   +  
Client  involvement   +   -­‐  
Generation  of  innovative  ideas   +   -­‐  
In-­‐depth  probing  of  individuals   -­‐   +  
Uncovering  of  hidden  motives   -­‐   +  
Discussion  of  sensitive  topics   -­‐   +  

  15  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Interviews  with  respondents  who  are  competitors   -­‐   +  


Interviews  with  respondents  who  are  professionals   -­‐   +  
Scheduling  of  respondents   -­‐   +  
Amount  of  information   +   -­‐  
Bias  in  moderation  and  interpretation   +   -­‐  
Cost  per  respondent   +   -­‐  
• Applications  of  in-­‐depth  interviews  
1. Detailed  probing  of  respondents  
2. Discussion  of  confidential,  sensitive  of  embarrassing  topics  
3. Situations  where  strong  social  norms  exist  sand  the  respondent  might  be  easily  swaged  by  the  group’s  
response  
4. Detailed  understanding  of  complicated  behaviour  
5. Interviews  with  professional  people  
6. Interviews  with  competitors,  who  are  unlikely  to  reveal  the  information  in  a  group  setting  
7. Situations  where  the  product  consumption  experience  is  sensory  in  nature,  affecting  mood  states  and  
emotions  (e.g.  shaving  experience,  soap/perfume)  
8. Exploratory  research  
• Ground  theory:  an  inductive  and  more  structured  approach  in  which  each  subsequent  depth  interview  is  adjusted  
based  on  the  culmative  findings  from  previous  depth  interviews  with  the  purpose  of  developing  general  concepts  or  
theories  

Indirect  (disguised):  Projective  Techniques  


• Projective:  an  unstructured  and  indirect  form  of  questioning  that  encourages  respondents  to  project  their  underlying  
motivations,  beliefs,  attitudes  or  feelings  regarding  the  issues  of  concern.  
• Used  in  marketing  situations  where  a  respondent  is  unable  or  unwilling  to  answer  a  question  directly  
• E.g.  Respondents  might  be  able  to  interpret  the  behaviour  of  others  rather  than  describe  their  own  and  in  doing  so  
indirectly  project  their  own  motivations,  beliefs,  attitudes  or  feelings  into  the  situation  
• Four  types:  
1. Association  
2. Completion  
3. Construction  
4. Expressive  

Association  
• Association  techniques:  a  type  of  projective  technique  in  which  the  respondent  is  presented  with  a  stimulus  and  asked  
to  respond  with  the  first  thing  that  comes  to  mind.  
• Word  association:  a  projective  technique  in  which  respondents  are  presented  with  a  list  of  words,  one  at  a  time.  After  
each  word  is  presented,  respondents  are  asked  to  give  the  first  word  that  comes  to  mind.  
→ Words  of  interest  are  called  test  words  
→ List  includes  neutral,  filler  words  to  disguise  purpose  of  study  
• Analysed  by  calculating:  
1. Frequency  of  using  same  word  
2. Latency  
• Response  latency:  the  longer  a  individual  hesitates  before  answering,  the  higher  the  assumed  level  of  involvement  with  
the  subject  
• A  non-­‐response  is  thought  to  indicate  the  highest  level  of  emotional  involvement,  because  these  people  are  too  
involved  to  be  able  to  respond  in  a  short  time.  
• E.g.  Thoughts  that  come  to  mind  when  one  says  IKEA  are  jotted  down  by  the  researcher  

Completion  Techniques  
• Completion  techniques  Requires  the  respondent  to  complete  an  incomplete  stimulus  situation  
• Sentence  completion:  a  projective  technique  that  requires  the  respondent  to  complete  a  number  of  incomplete  
sentences  using  the  first  word  or  phrase  the  comes  to  mind.  
• More  directed  than  associations,  but  not  as  disguised  
• E.g.  Ikea  reminds  me  of….  People  who  shop  at  Ikea  are…  My  friends  think  Ikea  is….  Friend  visiting  from  overseas  thinks  
Ikea  is….  
• Story  competition:  respondents  are  provided  with  part  of  a  story  and  are  required  to  give  their  conclusion  in  their  own  
words.  

  16  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Construction  Techniques  
• Construction  techniques:  requires  the  respondent  to  construct  a  response-­‐  in  the  form  of  a  story,  dialogue  or  
description  
• Picture-­‐  response  technique:  the  respondent  is  shown  a  picture  and  asked  to  tell  a  story  describing  it;  an  analogy  e.g.  
the  cola  world.  Respondents  make  up  a  story  
→ These  stories  are  analyzed  in  an  attempt  to  identify  themes  reflecting  the  individuals  perceptual  interpretation  
of  pictures  
• Cartoon  tests:  cartoon  characters  are  shown  in  a  specific  situation  related  to  the  problem.  The  respondents  are  asked  
to  indicate  the  dialogue  that  one  cartoon  character  might  make  in  response  to  the  comments  of  other,  usually  
unspoken  thoughts  
→ 1  Is  given  response  is  given-­‐  participant  is  asked  to  fill  in  the  other  (e.g.  lets  get  some  clothes  from  target,  other  
person  fills  in  response)  
→ Tends  to  maximize  the  candid  nature  of  responses  
• Used  to  evaluate  perceptions  and  attitudes  towards  topic  

Expressive  Techniques  
• Expressive  techniques:  the  respondents  are  presented  with  a  verbal  or  visual  situation  and  asked  to  relate  the  feelings  
and  attitudes  of  other  people  to  the  situation  
• Role  playing:  respondents  are  asked  to  play  the  role  or  assume  the  behaviour  of  someone  else  
• Third  Person  Technique:  respondent  is  presented  with  a  verbal  or  visual  situation  and  asked  to  relate  the  beliefs  and  
attitudes  of  a  third  person  to  the  situation  (such  as  their  parent/neighbor)  
• May  be  used  when  questions  are  embarrassing/  answers  aren’t  socially  desirable  
• Assumes  individual  will  reveal  personal  beliefs/attitudes  while  describing  other/situation  
• Reduces  social  pressure  errors  

Other  projective  techniques  


• Bring  an  item:  item  may  be  representative  of  participants  views  
• Planets  (and  guided  fantasy)-­‐  e.g.  what  are  the  people  like  that  inhabit  “Planet  Coke”,  go  to  competing  Planets  
• Courtroom  drama:  participant  asked  to  assess  the  “case”  which  is  relevant  to  product  
• Brand  personification  and  obituary:  what  would  the  brand  look  like  if  it  were  a  person?  If  coca  cola  died  how  would  
you  remember  it?  
• Time  machine:  asks  participants  to  look  at  toys  20  years  ago,  currently  and  20  years  in  the  future  
• Withdrawal  techniques:  understanding  consumer  relationships  with  brands  and  products  (e.g.  how  would  a  person  
feel  if  they  took  their  phone  away-­‐  if  you  had  to  go  to  a  desert  island  and  could  only  bring  1  product  what  would  that  
product  be  and  why?  

Advantages/Disadvantages  of  projective  techniques  


• Advantages:  
→ May  elicit  responses  that  subjects  would  be  unwilling/unable  to  give  if  they  knew  the  purpose  of  the  study  
→ Increase  the  validity  of  the  responses  by  disguising  the  purpose  
→ Sensitive,  personal  issues  or  ones  strong  to  social  norms  
→ Helpful  when  underlying  motivations,  beliefs  and  attitudes  are  operating  at  a  subconscious  level  
• Disadvantages:    
→ Require  highly  trained  interviewers  and  skilled  interpreters  to  analyze  the  responses-­‐  expensive  
→ Interpretation  bias  
→ All  techniques  are  open  ended  (except  word  association)  thus  analysis  and  interpretation  is  difficult  and  
subjective  
→ Those  asked  to  participate  (particularly  in  role  plays)  might  not  be  representative  of  the  population  of  interest  
• It  is  desirable  to  compare  findings  generated  by  projective  techniques  with  the  findings  of  other  techniques  that  permit  
a  more  representative  sample.  

Applications:  
• Projective  techniques  are  used  less  than  focus  groups  or  in-­‐depth  interviews  
• Word  association  is  the  most  commonly  used  for  testing  brand  names,  measure  attitudes  about  particular  products,  
brands,  packaging  or  advertisement  
• Their  usefulness  is  enhanced  when:  
1. Sensitivity  of  the  subject  matter  is  such  that  respondents  might  not  be  willing  or  able  to  answer  honestly  to  
direct  questions  
2. To  uncover  subconscious  motives,  beliefs,  or  values,  providing  deeper  insights  and  understanding  as  part  of  
exploratory  research  
3. Administered  and  interpreted  by  trained  interviewers  who  understand  their  advantages  and  limitations.  
  17  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Other  Qualitative  Research  Techniques  


• Friendship  pairs  and  triads:  two  or  three  people  are  interviewed  together;  familiarly  keeps  discussion  open  
• Conflict  groups:  two  sides  of  a  debate  
• Affinity  groups:  like  minded  people,  moderator  may  act  as  devils  advocate  
• House-­‐tree-­‐person  (HTP)  test:  inferences  about  a  target  market  based  on  their  drawings  of  a  house,  tree  and  person  
• Personification:  name  an  animal  or  object  which  symbolizes  the  brand,  product,  company  
• The  Friendly  Martian:  respondents  have  to  advise  friendly  Martian  who  has  no  views/knowledge  on  the  subject  at  
hand.  
 
Page  204  diagram  

Acronym  
Key  characteristics  of  a  focus  group  can  be  described  by  FOCUS  GROUPS:  
• Focused  on  a  particular  topic  
• Outline  prepared  for  discussion  
• Characteristics  of  the  moderator  
• Unstructured  
• Size:  8  to  12  participants  
• Group  composition:  homogenous  
• Recorded:  audio  and  video  recording  
• Observation:  one  way  mirror  
• Undisguised  
• Physical  setting:  relaxed  
• Several  sessions  needed:  1-­‐  3  hours  each  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
  18  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

MKTG  2305  Chapter  7  Summary:  Descriptive  Research  Design:  Survey  


and  Observation  
Learning  Objectives  
• Understand  the  various  types  of  survey  methods  and  their  advantages  and  disadvantages  
• Understand  the  10  step  process  of  questionnaire  design  
• Know  the  various  techniques  that  can  be  used  to  enhance  
respondents  ability  and  willingness  to  answer  
• Understand  the  different  types  of  questions  that  can  be  
used  and  be  able  to  identify  and  correct  questions  that  are  
poorly  worded  and  designed  

Methods  of  Obtaining  Quantitative  Data  in  Descriptive  Research  


>>  
1. Observation:  Information  obtained  by  observing  behaviour  
or  phenomena  
2. Survey:  Information  obtained  by  questioning  respondents  

The  Survey  Method  


• Survey  method:  a  structured  questionnaire  given  to  a  
sample  of  a  population  and  designed  to  elicit  specific  information  from  respondents.  
• The  survey  method  of  obtaining  information  is  based  on  questioning  respondents  
• Perhaps  the  biggest  issue  researchers  face  is  how  to  motivate  respondents  to  candidly  answer  their  questions-­‐  
challenge  of  controlling  the  non  response  problem  
• Questions  regarding  behaviour,  intentions,  attitudes,  awareness,  motivations,  and  demographic  and  lifestyle  
characteristics  all  lend  themselves  to  survey  research  
• Advantages:  
→ Easy  to  administer  
→ Fixed  response  questions  reduces  variability  and  increases  reliability  
→ Simplifies  coding,  analysis  and  interpretation  of  data  
• Disadvantages:  
→ Respondents  might  be  unable  or  unwilling  to  provide  the  desire  information  
→ The  subconscious  nature  of  ones  motives  might  make  it  impossible  to  answer  the  question  
→ Unwilling  to  respond  if  information  is  sensitive  or  personal  
→ Structured  data  collection  (questions  
in  a  prearranged  order):  loss  of  validity  
for  certain  data  such  as  feelings  or  
beliefs  
→ Difficult  to  properly  phrase  questions  
(Chapter  11)  
• Most  common  method  of  primary  data  
collection  in  market  research  

Classification  of  Survey  Methods>>  


• Sample  control:  the  ability  of  the  survey  mode  
to  effectively  and  efficiently  reach  the  units  
specified  in  the  sample  
• Control  of  the  field  force:  is  the  survey  
occurring  in  a  central  location-­‐  can  the  
interviews  be  moderated/  supervised  form  one  
place  etc.  
• Response  rate:  the  percentage  of  the  total  attempted  interviews  that  are  completed  
• Quantity  of  data:  depends  on  the  participants  ability  to  walk  away/  exit  the  survey  at  any  time  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Method   Advantages   Disadvantages  
  19  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

  Telephone  and   Fast   No  use  of  physical  stimuli  


    Good  Sample  control   Limited  to  simple  questions  
Telephone   Computer  Assisted  Telephone   Good  control  of  field  force   Low  quantity  of  data  can  be  collected  
Interviewing  (CATI)-­‐  interviewers   Good  response  rate   Less  commitment  thus  less  tolerance  
puts  results  into  a  computer   Moderate  cost   for  lengthy  interviews  –  hang  up  

  In  Home   Complex  questions  can  be  asked   Low  control  of  field  force  
Personal   Good  for  physical  stimuli   High  social  desirability    
Very  good  sample  control   Potential  for  interviewer  bias  
High  quantity  of  data   Most  expensive  
Very  good  response  rate   Some  samples  (e.g.  high-­‐crime  areas)  
Longer  interviews  can  be  done   may  be  difficult  to  access  
May  take  long  to  collect  the  data  
Mall  intercept   Complex  questions  can  be  asked   High  potential  for  social  desirability  
Very  good  for  physical  stimuli   Potential  for  interviewer  bias  
Very  good  control  of  environment   Moderate  quantity  of  data    
Very  good  response  rate   High  cost  
CAPI:  respondent  sits  in  front  of   Complex  questions  can  be  asked   High  social  desirability  
a  computer  terminal  and   Very  good  for  physical  stimuli   Moderate  quantity  of  data  
answers  a  questionnaire  on  the   Very  good  control  of  environment   High  cost  
screen  usually  in  the  form  of   Very  good  response  rate    
user-­‐friendly  electronic   Low  potential  for  interviewer  bias  
packages-­‐  used  in  shopping  
malls,  trade  shows  or  
conventions  
  Mail/Fax  interview   No  field-­‐force  problems   Limited  to  simple  questions  
Mail   No  interviewer  bias   Low  sample  control  for  cold  mail  
Moderate/high  quantity  of  data   No  control  of  environment  
Low  social  desirability   Low  response  rate  for  cold  mail  
Low  cost   Low  speed  
Mail  Panel:  a  large  and  nationally   No  field-­‐force  problems   Limited  to  simple  questions  
representative  sample  of   No  interviewer  bias   No  control  of  environment    
households  that  have  agreed  to   High  quantity  of  data   Low/Moderate  speed  
periodically  participate  in  mail   Low  social  desirability  
questionnaires,  product  tests  and   Low/moderate  cost  
survey  research.   Good  sample  control  
Electronic   Email   No  interviewer  bias   Low  sample  control    
Low  cost   No  control  of  environment  
Low  social  desirability   Low  response  rate  
High  speed   Moderate  quantity  of  data  
Contract  hard-­‐to-­‐reach   Security  concerns  
respondents  
Internet   No  interviewer  bias   Low  sample  control  
Low  cost   No  control  of  environment  
Low  social  desirability   Low  response  rate  
Very  high  speed   Moderate  quantity  of  data  
Visual  appeal  and  interactivity  
Personalised,  flexible  questioning  
Contact  hard-­‐reach  respondents  
  Electronic  surveys  software  and   Can  perform  tasks  such  as:  
sites   • Personalization  
• Incorporate  complex  skip  patterns  
• Randomize  response  choices  
• Consistency  checks  
• Add  new  response  categories  as  the  interviewing  progresses  
  Free/low  cost  survey  sites   Allow  users  to  create  and  file  their  own  surveys  for  free  or  at  low  cost.  Users  
provide  respondents  at  their  own  discretion.  
 

  20  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Criteria  for  selection  a  Survey  method  


1. If  complex  and  diverse  questions  have  to  be  asked:  personal  methods  or  internet  surveys  
2. From  the  perspective  of  the  use  of  physical  stimuli:  personal  methods  
3. If  sample  control  is  an  issue:  cold  mail  (but  not  mail  panel),  fax  and  electronic  methods  might  not  be  appropriate  
4. Control  of  the  data  collection  environment:  favours  the  use  of  central  location  interviewing-­‐  mall  intercept  and  CAPI  
5. High  quantity  of  data:  in  home  and  mail  panels  and  sometimes  telephone  interviewing  
6. Low  response  rates:  not  cold  mail  and  electronic  methods  
7. Social  desirability  is  an  issue:  mail,  mail  panel,  fax  and  internet  surveys  
8. If  the  interview  is  bias  on  an  issue:  mail  (cold  and  panels),  fax  and  electronic  interviewing  is  favoured  
9. Speed  favour  internet,  email,  telephone  and  fax  methods  
10. Costs  favour:  cold  mail,  fax,  electronic  (email  and  internet),  mail  panels,  telephone,  mall  intercept,  CAPI  and  in  home  
methods  in  that  order  (most  to  least)  

Improving  Survey  Response  Rates  


• Prior  notification:  reduces  surprise  and  uncertainty  and  creates  a  more  cooperative  atmosphere  
• Incentives:  
→ Prepaid  incentive:  coupons,  money  or  some  other  incentive  to  participate  
→ Promised  incentive:  coupons  money  or  some  incentive  that  is  sent  only  to  those  who  participate.  
→ Cost  of  large  monetary  incentives  might  outweigh  the  value  of  the  additional  information  obtained  
• Follow  up:  Contacting  non-­‐respondents  periodically  after  the  initial  contact  (mail  surveys  particularly)-­‐  via  telephone,  
email  or  personal  contact  and  can  be  more  than  once  
• Personalization:  or  sending  letters  addressed  to  specific  individuals  
• Ease  of  response:  properly  target  survey,  well-­‐designed  questionnaire,  self-­‐addressed  envelop,  professional  response  

Observation  
• Observation:    The  recording  of  behavioural  patterns  of  people,  objects  and  events  in  a  systematic  manner  to  obtain  
information  about  the  phenomenon  of  interest  
• Physical  actions,  body  language,  tracking  eye  movement,  temporal  actions,  amount  of  wear  on  floor  in  front  of  exhibits,  
license  plate  surveys,  tracking  time  people  fixate  on  an  object  
 
Personal  observation:    
• Personal  observation:  a  trained  observer  collects  the  data  by  recording  behaviour  exactly  as  it  occurs  (e.g.  observing  
traffic  counts  in  a  department  store)  
1. Humanistic  inquiry:    form  of  personal  observation  in  which  the  researcher  is  immersed  in  the  system  under  
study  (e.g.  asks  another  shopper  on  advice  for  which  brand  to  choose)  
• Advantage:    
→ Highly  flexible  method  because  the  observer  can  record  a  wide  variety  of  phenomena  
→ Highly  suitable  in  for  use  in  natural  settings  (e.g.  a  regular  sales  meeting)  
• Disadvantage:    
→ Information  is  recorded  after  observation-­‐  leading  to  high  observation  bias  
→ Doesn’t  tell  you  why  people  are  behaving  like  that  

Mechanical  observation  
• Mechanical  observation:  an  observational  research  strategy  in  which  mechanical  devices  rather  than  human  observers,  
record  the  phenomena  being  observed.  
• Devices  may  not  require  respondents  direct  participation  
• Example:  Peoplemeter  is  attached  to  a  television  and  continually  records  not  only  the  channels  the  television  is  tuned  
to  but  who  are  watching.  
• Advantages:  
→ Low  observation  bias  
→ Low-­‐to-­‐medium  analysis  bias  
• Disadvantages:  
→ Can  be  intrusive  
→ Not  always  suitable  in  natural  settings  

A  Comparison  of  Survey  and  Observational  Methods  


• Observational  advantages:  
→ Doesn’t  require  conscious  respondent  participation  which  minimizes  nonresponse  errors  
→ Interviewer  bias  is  minimized,  because  the  observer  only  has  to  record  what  is  occurring.  
→ Errors  in  self-­‐reported  behaviour  are  eliminated,  given  the  observer  only  records  actual  behaviour  
→ Good  for  children’s  product  preferences  or  reacting  to  marketing  material  
  21  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ Good  for  identifying  unconscious  behaviour  patterns  or  behaviours  that  individuals  might  be  unwilling  to  
discuss  honestly.  
→ Best  technique  for  phenomena  that  occur  frequently  or  are  of  short  duration-­‐  in  these  situations  it  may  cost  
less  and  be  faster  than  survey  methods.  
• Observational  disadvantages:  
→ Provides  insight  into  what  behaviour  is  occurring  but  not  why-­‐  attitudes,  motivations  and  values  are  all  lost  
→ Highly  personal  behaviours  are  not  available  for  interaction  (e.g.  personal  hygiene)  
→ Observer  might  overlook  important  features  through  selective  observation-­‐  threatens  integrity  
→ Can  be  adopted  only  for  frequent  behaviours  of  short  duration  as  behaviours  occurring  infrequently  or  long  
term  are  too  expensive  and  time  consuming  to  record  
• Best  to  view  observation  as  a  complement  to  survey  methods  rather  than  in  competition  

Other  methods  of  descriptive  research  


• Ethnographic  research:  the  study  of  human  behaviour  in  its  natural  context  that  involves  observation  of  behaviour  and  
setting  along  with  in-­‐depth  interviews  
• Mystery  Shopping:    combines  questioning  and  observation  

Acronym  
The  classification  of  survey  methods  by  administration  may  be  described  by  METHODS:  
• Mail  panels  
• Electronic  interviews  
• Telephone  interviews  
• Home  (in  home  personal)  interviewing  
• On-­‐site  mall  interviews  
• Direct  mail  interviews  
• Software  for  CATI-­‐CAPI  

MKTG  2305  Chapter  11  Summary:  Questionnaire  and  Form  Design  


The  Questionnaire  
• Questionnaire:  a  structured  technique  for  data  collection  that  consists  of  a  series  of  questions,  written  or  verbal,  that  a  
respondent  answers  
• A  questionnaire  is  a  formalized  set  of  questions  for  obtaining  information  from  respondents  
1. Objective  1:  It  must  translate  the  information  needed  into  a  set  of  specific  questions  that  the  respondents  can  
and  will  answer  
2. Objective  2:  Motivate  respondents  to  complete  the  interview,  without  biases  their  response  
3. Objective  3:  A  questionnaire  should  minimize  response  error.  
 

Questionnaire  Design  Process  


1. Specify  the  information  needed  
2. Specify  the  type  of  interviewing  method  
3. Determine  the  content  of  individual  questions  
4. Design  the  question  to  overcome  the  respondent’s  inability  and  unwillingness  to  answer  
5. Decide  on  the  question  structure  
6. Determine  the  question  wording  
7. Arrange  the  questions  in  proper  order  
8. Identify  the  form  and  layout  
9. Reproduce  the  questionnaire  
10. Pretest  the  questionnaire-­‐  eliminate  faults  

Step  1:  Specify  the  Information  Needed  


• Prior  to  this  step  the  researchers  should  have  been  as  meticulous  and  precise  as  possible  in  framing  the  research  
problem  
• Descriptive  and  casual  research  require  previous  knowledge  to  guide  research  
• Need  to  transform  research  objectives  into  information  objectives  
• Consider  respondent  group  

Step  2:  Specify  the  type  of  interviewing  method  


• Telephone,  personal,  mail  or  electronic  interviews  
• Type  of  data  required  affects  the  method  selected  
  22  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

• The  interviewing  method  can  affect  the  design  of  the  questionnaire  
• Again  consider  the  respondent  group  
• Consider  issues  such  as:  
→ Personal:  Face-­‐to-­‐face  give  opportunity  for  feedback,  clarification,  can  be  lengthy,  and  incorporate  visual  aids-­‐  
as  respondent  cant  see  questionnaire  questions  must  be  short  and  simple  
→ Interview  administered  questionnaire:  written  in  conversational  manner  
→ Mail  and  Electronic  questionnaires  are  self  administered  thus  questions  and  instructions  must  be  simple  and  
thorough  
→ In  CATI,  CAPI  or  internet  and  social  media  surveys  the  computer  guides  the  respondent  through  complex  skip  
patterns  and  can  incorporate  randomization  of  questions    to  eliminate  order  bias  

Step  3:  Determine  the  content  of  individual  questions  


• Is  the  question  necessary?  
→ Neutral  questions:  for  sensitive  or  controversial  topics  
→ Filler  questions:  to  disguise  purpose  of  survey  
→ Duplication  of  questions:  validity  and  reliability  
• Are  several  questions  needed  instead  of  one?  
→ Avoid  double  barreled  questions:  “Do  you  think  Nike  Town  offers  better  variety  and  prices  than  other  Nike  
stores?”  WRONG  break  into  two  questions  
→ Consider  ‘why’  questions  
o Multiple  responses  related  to  different  aspects  (e.g.  product  attributes  and  influences)  

Step  4:  Design  the  question  to  overcome  respondents  inability  to  answer  
Is  the  respondent  informed?  
→ Answers  are  only  meaningful  if  the  respondent  is  informed  (e.g.  Husband  may  be  unequipped  to  answer  
questions  on  grocery  shopping  expenditure)  
→ Willing  and  able  to  answer  
→ Use  filter  questions  when  the  topic  requires  specialized  experience  or  knowledge:  initial  questions  in  a  
questionnaire  that  screen  potential  respondents  to  ensure  they  meet  the  requirement  of  the  sample.  
→ Offer  ‘don’t  know’  response  options  
• Recall  the  information?  (e.g.  grocery  spend  wk/yr)  
→ Omission/Telescoping/Creation  
→ Recall  is  affected  by  the  event,  the  time  elapsed,  cues  that  aid  memory  
→ Questions  can  be  designed  to  aid  recall  and  unaided  recall  
→ Aid  recall:  lists  a  number  of  soft  drink  brands  then  asks  which  ones  were  advertised  on  tv  last  night  
→ Unaided  recall:  Which  brands  of  soft  drink  do  you  remember  being  advertised  on  tv  last  night.  
• Able  to  articulate  response?  
→ Difficult  to  describe  the  ideal  atmosphere  of  a  store  for  example  
→ Provide  visual  aids,  maps,  verbal  descriptions,  diagrams  
• Will  the  respondents  give  the  information?  Depends  on:  
→ Effort  required-­‐  approximation  (e.g.  what  was  bought  during  the  shopping  visit)  
→ Legitimate  response:  
o Relevancy  of  question  
o Appropriate  context?  
→ Sensitive  information  (embarrassing  or  threating)  
o Includes  money,  political/religious  beliefs,  involvement  in  accidents/crimes  
 

Step  5:  Design  the  Questionnaire  to  overcome  the  respondents  unwillingness  to  Answer  
• Reduce  the  effort  required  by  respondents  (tick  instead  of  list)  
• Explain  to  participants  why  questions  that  don’t  seem  to  have  a  legitimate  purpose  are  in  the  questionnaire  and  explain  
the  context  of  the  survey-­‐  people  are  more  likely  to  object  to  questions  that  don’t  seem  to  serve  a  legitimate  purpose  
(e.g.  demographics  in  a  cereal  packaging  questionnaire)  
• Handling  sensitive  topics:  Put  these  questions  at  the  end  and  ease  into  them  and  use  categories  instead  of  asking  for  
specific  figures  (e.g.  income)  
• Increasing  response  rates  
→ Incentives,  good  cover  letter,  make  the  survey  more  personalized  (e.g.  attach  tea  bag  for  a  tea)  
→ Follow  up  on  their  survey  
 

  23  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Step  5:  Decide  on  Question  Structure  


Unstructured  Questions  
• Unstructured  questions  are  open-­‐ended  questions  
that  respondents  answer  in  their  own  words  
→ Exploratory/  why  type  questions  
→ How  would  you  describe  the  level  of  service  
provided  by  the  Student  Guild  at  the  
university  of  Western  Australia?  
 
Structured  Questions  
• Structured  questions:  questions  that  prespecify  the  set  
of  response  alternatives  and  the  response  format.  A  
structured  question  may  be  multiple-­‐choice,  
dichotomous,  or  a  scale  
1. Multiple  Choice  Questions:  the  researcher  provides  a  choice  of  answers  and  respondents  are  asked  to  select  one  or  
more  of  the  alternatives  given  
→ Do  you  intend  to  buy  a  new  car  within  the  next  six  months:  definitely  will  not  buy,  probably  will  buy,  
undecided,  probably  will  buy,  definitely  will  buy  
2. Dichotomous  Question:  has  only  two  response  alternatives:  yes  or  no,  agree  or  disagree,  and  so  on.    
→ Often  the  two  alternatives  of  interest  are  supplemented  by  a  neutral  alternative,  such  as  “no  opinion”,  “don’t  
know”,  “both”  or  “none”  
→ Do  you  intend  to  buy  a  new  car  within  the  next  six  months:  yes,  no  or  don’t  know  
3. Scales  
Question  Type   Advantages   Disadvantages   Comments  
Unstructured   Good  as  first  Questions-­‐   Potential  for  interviewer  bias-­‐   Useful  for  exploratory  
express  general  attitudes  and   only  records  what  they   research  
opinions   perceive  as  important  
Responses  are  less  biased-­‐   Coding  is  costly  and  time  
responses  aren’t  restricted  to   consuming  
predefined  alternatives   Greater  weight  to  articulate  
Can  provide  rich  insights   respondents  
Unsuitable  for  self-­‐
administered  questionnaires  
 
Multiple  Choice   Interviewer  bias  is  reduced-­‐   Order  or  position  bias:  a   Responses  should  be  
as  these  questions  are  mainly   respondents  tendency  to   mutually  exclusive  and  
self-­‐adminsitered   choose  an  alternative  merely   collectively  exhaustive  
Easy  to  code  and  analyze   because  it  occupies  a  certain    
Improved  respondent   position  on  the  page  or  in  a   Useful  in  large  surveys  
participation   list  (reduced  by  preparing  
Easy  for  respondents  to   several  forms  of  the  
answer   questionnaire  with  changes  in  
the  order  of  alternatives)  
Difficult  to  design  response  
options  
Dichotomous   Same  as  multiple  choice   Wording  can  bias  responses   Use  split-­‐ballot  technique:  
frame  the  question  one  way  
in  half  of  the  questionnaires  
and  the  other  way  in  the  
other  half  
Scales   Same  as  multiple  choice   Difficult  to  design  multi-­‐item   Scales  should  be  evaluated  
scales   for  reliability,  validity  and  
generlizability  
 

Step  6:  Determine  the  Question  Wording  


• The  effects  of  poor  phrasing  affects:  
→ Item  nonresponse:  refusal  rate  to  answer  increases  
→ Measurement  error:  accuracy  of  response  decreases  
• Define  the  issue:  Define  the  issue  in  terms  of  who,  what,  when,  where,  why  and  way:  
→ Which  brand  of  toothpaste  do  you  use:  WRONG  
  24  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ Which  brands  or  brands  of  toothpaste  have  you  personally  used  at  home  during  the  past  month?  In  the  case  of  
more  than  one  brand,  please  list  all  the  brands  that  apply?:  RIGHT  
• Use  simple  words:  avoid  technical  jargon  
• Use  unambiguous  words  
→ Avoid  ambiguous  words  and  questions  and  instead  state  specific  frames:  in  question  or  answer  e.g.  How  often  
do  you  listen  to  country  music  in  a  month?  
→ Use  specific  time  frames  such  as  3-­‐4  times  rather  than  occasionally,  sometimes,  regularly  etc.  
• Avoid  leading  questions:  giving  respondents  a  clue  about  how  they  should  answer  
→ Acquiescence  bias:  bias  resulting  from  some  
respondents  tendency  to  agree  with  the  direction  of  
the  leading  question  (yea-­‐saying)  
→ E.g.  Is  Colgate  your  favourite  toothpaste  (WRONG)  vs.  
What  is  your  favourite  brand  of  toothpaste  (RIGHT)  
• Avoid  implied  alternatives:    
→ One  that  is  not  expressed  in  the  options  
→ Depending  on  how  the  question  is  worded,  responses  
differ  
• Avoid  implied  assumptions:  implied  assumptions  given  about  
the  consequence  
• Avoid  double  barreled  questions:  where  two  responses  are  
called  for,  unsure  which  one  is  right  
• Avoid  generalizations  and  estimates  

Step  7:  Determining  the  Order  of  the  Questions  


• Opening  Questions:  the  opening  questions  should  be  interesting,  simple  and  non-­‐threatening  
• Types  of  Information:  as  a  general  guideline,  basic  information  should  be  obtained  first,  followed  by  classification,  and  
finally,  identification  information  
1. Basic  information:  information  that  relates  directly  to  the  marketing  research  problem  
2. Classification  information:  socioeconomic  and  demographic  characteristics  used  to  classify  respondents  
3. Identification  information:  name,  postal  address,  email  address  and  phone  number  
• Difficult  questions:  difficult  questions  or  questions  which  are  sensitive,  embarrassing,  complex  or  dull,  should  be  placed  
late  in  the  sequence  
• Effect  on  subsequent  questions  
→ General  questions  should  precede  the  specific  questions  (funnel  approach)  
o Q1:  What  considerations  are  important  to  you  in  selecting  a  department  store  
o Q2:  In  selecting  a  department  store,  how  important  is  the  convenience  of  location  
→ This  is  in  alignment  with  the  funnel  approach:  a  strategy  for  ordering  questions  in  a  questionnaire  in  which  the  
sequence  starts  with  the  general  questions  which  are  followed  by  progressively  specific  questions,  in  order  to  
prevent  specific  questions  from  biasing  responses  to  general  questions  
• Logical  order:  questions  should  asked  in  logical  order  and  organized  around  topic  areas.  
→ Use  brief  transitional  phrases  or  sentences  when  switching  topics    
→ Branching  questions:  questions  used  to  guide  respondents  or  interviewers  through  a  survey  by  directing  them  
to  different  sports  on  the  questionnaire  depending  on  the  answers  given.  (e.g.  If  the  Answer  to  10  is  no  then  
skip  to  question  12)  

Step  8:  Form  and  Layout  


• Divide  a  questionnaire  into  several  parts  
• The  questions  in  each  part  should  be  numbered  particularly  when  branching  questions  are  used  
• The  questionnaires  should  preferably  be  precoded:  assigning  a  code  to  every  conceivable  response  before  data  
collection.  
• The  questionnaires  themselves  should  be  numbered  serially  
• Length  
→ Personal  face  to  face  –  max  25  minutes,  with  incentive  max  50  min  
→ Telephone  20  and  40  min  
→ Intercept  15  and  30  min  
→ May  depend  on  type  of  issue,  whether  in  interests  of  society  and/or  respondent  
→ Telephone  –  Not  before  9am  or  after  9pm  (8.30pm  at  weekends)  
→ Door  to  door  in  daylight  hours  
 

  25  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Step  9:  Reproduction  of  the  Questionnaire  


• The  questionnaire  should  be  reproduced  on  good-­‐quality  paper  and  have  a  professional  appearance.  
• Questionnaires  should  take  the  form  of  a  booklet  rather  than  a  number  of  sheets  of  paper  clipped  or  stapled  together.  
• Each  question  should  be  reproduced  on  a  single  page  (or  double-­‐page  spread).  
• Vertical  response  columns  should  be  used  for  individual  questions.  
• Grids  are  useful  when  there  are  a  number  of  related  questions  which  use  the  same  set  of  response  categories.  
• The  tendency  to  crowd  questions  together  to  make  the  questionnaire  look  shorter  should  be  avoided.  
• Directions  or  instructions  for  individual  questions  should  be  placed  as  close  to  the  questions  as  possible.  

Step  10:  Pretesting  


• Pretesting  refers  to  the  testing  of  the  questionnaire  on  a  small  sample  of  respondents    for  the  purpose  of  improving  the  
questionnaire  by  identifying  and  eliminating  potential  problems  before  using  it  in  the  actual  survey/  
• Interview  the  pre-­‐test  sample  using  the  same  mode  of  administration  
• Need  to  know:  
→ Whether  the  questions  are  understood  
→ Whether  response  categories  are  appropriate  
→ How  long  the  questionnaire  takes  to  complete  

Advantages  and  Disadvantages  of  Survey  Research  


• Advantages  
→ You  can  preplan  it    
→ Reliable  
→ Allows  the  use  of  advanced  statistical  analysis  
→ Large  sample  size  
→ You  have  control  
→ Able  to  distinguish  and  differentiate  
• Disadvantages  
→ Low  response  rates  
→ Respondents  are  unwilling  to  provide  the  information-­‐  such  an  sensitive  
→ Difficult  to  provide  in-­‐depth  data  structures  
→ Difficult  to  know  if  the  respondent  is  being  truthful  
→ Poor  use  of  analysis  techniques  
→ Can  be  difficult  to  administer  

A  Question  should:  
1. Define  the  issue:  who,  what,  when,  where,  why  and  way  
2. Use  Ordinary  words:  words  should  match  the  vocabulary  level  of  respondents  
3. Use  unambiguous  words:  avoid  usually,  normally,  regularly,  frequently  and  sometimes  
4. Avoid  leading  or  biasing  the  responding:  do  not  bias  or  clue  the  respondent  to  what  the  answers  should  be  
5. Use  dual  statements:  statements  should  be  positive  and  negative  

Acronyms  
The  objectives  and  steps  involved  in  developing  a  questionnaire  may  be  defined  by  the  acronym  QUESTIONNAIRE:  
Objectives:    
• Q  uestions  that  the  respondents  can  answer  
• U  plift  the  respondent  
• E  rror  elimination  
Steps:  
• S  pecify  the  information  needed  
• T  ype  of  interviewing  method  
• I  ndividual  question  content  
• O  vercoming  inability  and  unwillingness  to  answer  
• N  onstructured  versus  structured  questions  
• N  on  biased  question  wording  
• A  rrange  the  questions  in  proper  order  
• I  dentify  form  and  layout  
• R  eprodction  of  the  questionnaire  
• E  liminate  bugs  by  pretesting  
 
 
 
  26  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

 
 
The  guidelines  for  question  wording  may  be  summarized  by  the  acronym  WORDS  
• W  ho,  what,  when,  where,  why  and  way  
• O  bjective  questions:  avoid  leading  questions  
• R  egularily,  normally,  usually  etc.  should  be  avoided  
• D  ual  statements  (positive  and  negative)  
• S  imple,  ordinary  words  
 
The  guidelines  for  deciding  on  the  order  of  questions  may  be  summarized  by  the  acronym  ORDER  
• O  pening  questions:  simple  
• R  udimentary  or  basic  information  should  be  obtained  first  
• D  ifficult  qustions  toward  the  end  
• E  xamine  the  influence  on  subsequent  questions  
• R  eview  the  sequence  to  ensure  a  logical  order  
 

 
  27  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  28  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

MKTG  2305  Chapter  9  Summary:  Measurement  and  Scaling  


Learning  Objectives  
• Know  the  primary  scales  of  measurement  and  appropriate  types  of  analysis  for  each  
• Understand  the  various  comparative  and  non-­‐comparative  scaling  techniques  
• Knowledge  of  basic  sale  evaluation:  reliability  and  validity  

Measurement  and  Scaling  


• Measurement  means  assigning  numbers  or  other  symbols  to  characteristics  of  objects  according  to  certain  pre-­‐
specified  rules    
• Most  important  aspect  is  deciding  how  to  assign  numbers  to  the  characteristics  being  studied  
→ One-­‐to-­‐one  correspondence  between  the  numbers  and  the  characteristics  being  measured:  Need  to  decide  
unit/method/nature  of  measurement  (how  many,  how  and  what)  
→ The  rules  of  assigning  numbers  to  responses  or  categories  etc.  should  be  standardized  and  applied  uniformly  
→ Rules  must  not  change  over  objects  or  time:  consistent  measurement  method  
• In  marketing  research,  numbers  are  usually  assigned  for  one  of  two  reasons:  
1. To  permit  statistical  analysis  of  the  generated  data  
2. To  help  communicate  information  about  the  results.  
• Scaling  involves  creating  a  continuum  upon  which  measured  objects  are  located    
→ Can  be  considered  a  part  of  measurement-­‐  scale  place  the  objects  being  measured  along  a  continuum.  
→ Measurement:  assigning  1,2,  or  3  to  each  respondent  using  a  scale  that  ranges  from  1  to  3  
→ Scaling:  the  process  of  placing  consumer  response  along  an  attitudinal  spectrum  from  unfavorable  to  neutral  
to  favourable.  

Scale  Characteristics  
• Description:  unique  labels  or  descriptors  used  to  designate  each  value  of  the  scale  (e.g.  1=  female)  
• Order:  The  relative  sizes  or  positions  of  the  descriptors;  its  is  denoted  by  descriptors  such  as  greater  than,  less  than  or  
equal  to  (e.g.  preference  for  Nike  is  greater  than  preference  for  Asics),  used  in  comparative  scaling  
• Distance:  the  absolute  differences  between  the  scale  
descriptors  are  known  and  can  be  expressed  in  units  
(e.g.  5  strongly  agree  expresses  1  more  unit  of  
agreement  than  4.  Agree)  
• Origin:  indicates  that  the  scale  has  a  true  0  point  (e.g.  
income,  weight,  sales)  

Considerations  When  Developing  Scales  


• The  number  of  categories  to  use  
• Balanced  (equal  number  of  positive  and  negative  
categories)  or  unbalanced  scales  (when  most  
responses  are  skewed  one  way  there  are  more  choices  
in  this  area-­‐  e.g.  service  quality)  
• Forced  or  non-­‐forced  choices  
• Odd  or  even  number  of  categories  
• Nature  and  degree  of  verbal  description  
• The  physical  form  of  the  scale  

Primary  Scales  of  Measurement  >>  


• The  four  basic  sales  of  measurment  
• Nominal<Ordinal<Interval<Ratio    
→ Going  across  scale  complexity  increases  (harder  to  use)  
→ Contains  more  information  
• The  general  rule  is  to  select  the  lowest  level  of  measurement  that  will  enable  the  research  to  obtain  the  needed  
information  and  conduct  the  appropriate  statistical  analysis  
• More  than  one  type  of  primary  scale  can  be  used  in  a  survey  

Nominal  
• Nominal  scale:  a  scale  whose  numbers  serve  only  as  labels  or  tags  
for  identifying  and  classifying  objects.  When  used  for  

  29  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

identification  there  is  a  strict  one-­‐to-­‐one  correspondence  between  the  numbers  and  the  objects  
• Examples:  Bank  account  number;  Rugby  jersey  numbers  
• Type  of  analysis:  counting,  frequency  (mode,  %)  
• Widely  used  in  research:  to  identify  respondents  (gender,  occupation),  brands,  attributed,  stores,  characteristics  etc.  
• Example:  In  the  past  year  who  made  a  contribution  to  your  household  income:  
A.  male  head  b.  female  head  c.  both  
• Mode:  mode  is  the  most  common  value  in  the  set  of  responses  to  a  question  
→ Mode  is  most  common  which  is  1  the  category  assigned  to  females  
→ Valid  percent  removes  the  missing  scores  

Ordinal  
• Ordinal  scale:  a  ranking  scale  in  which  numbers  are  assigned  to  objects  to  indicate  
the  relative  extent  to  which  some  characteristic  is  possessed.    
• Thus  it  is  possible  to  determine  whether  an  object  has  more  or  less  of  a  characteristic  than  some  other  object  
• Indicates  order  and  identity  
• Can  determine  the  relative  position  (greater  than  or  
less  than),  but  not  ‘how’  different  things  are  
→ Ranking  of  teams  in  a  tournament,  runners  in  
a  race  (cant  measure  distance  between  
st
values:  1  place  may  have  been  4  seconds  
nd rd
ahead  of  2  who  was  5  seconds  ahead  of  3 )  
• Types  of  analysis:  mode  and  median  (percentiles)  
• Use  in  research:  to  measure  attitudes,  opinions,  
perceptions,  preferences  
• Example:  in  the  past  year  what  was  your  annual  
household  income  before  taxes?  
1.  Less  than  $20,001,  2.  $20,001  to  $50,000…..  5.  More  
than  $150,000  
• Median:  median  occurs  where  half  of  the  data  is  above  the  statistic  value  
and  half  is  below  
rd
→ Median  (mid  point)  falls  in  3  which  represents  the  3  category  
(35,000-­‐49,9999)  50%  culmative  percent  in    
→ Use  median  for  incomes,  salaries  etc.  as  the  median  isn’t  effected  
by  outliers  whilst  mean  isn’t  
 

Interval  
• Interval  Scale:  a  scale  in  which  the  numbers  are  
used  to  rank  objects  such  that  numerically  equal  
distances  on  the  scale  represent  equal  distances  in  
the  characteristic  being  measured.  
• A  scale  in  which  the  intervals  between  the  
numbers  are  meaningful  (example=  temperature)  
→ Numbers  are  used  to  evaluate  objects  
→ Appear  at  numerically  equal  distances  on  
the  scale  
→ They  represent  equal  distances  in  the  
characteristic  being  measured  
→ Enable  differences  to  be  compared  
→ Example:  rating  scales  
→ Zero  point  is  arbitrary  (unconstrained)  
• Types  of  Analysis:  mode,  median,  mean  (range,  std  
dev.)  
• Use  in  Research:  for  measuring  attitudes  
• Example:  in  the  past  year  what  was  your  annual  
household  income  before  taxes?  
→ Circle  from  1-­‐7  1  being  much  below  
average.  4  being  average  and  7  being  much  above  average  
• Mean:  mean  is  the  arithmetic  average  of  all  the  data  responses  

  30  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ Very  poor  (1)  to  Excellent  (5)  


→ Mean:  (1x36)  +  (2x124)  +  (3x244)…./782=  3.4015  
 

Ratio  
• Ratio  scale:  this  is  the  highest  level  of  measurement.    
• Allows  the  researcher  to:  
→ Identify/classify  objects  AND  
→ Compare  the  objects  (rank/order  them)  AND  
→ Compare  intervals/differences  
• Contains  all  the  properties  of  nominal,  ordinal  and  interval,  AND  an  absolute  zero  point  e.g.  height,  age,  money  
• It  is  also  meaningful  to  compute  ratios  of  scale  values.  
• Zero  point  is  fixed:  20  kgs  is  twice  as  heavy  as  10kgs  (ratio  property)  
• Type  of  Analysis:  all  types  
• Use  in  Research:  sales,  costs,  market  share,  number  of  customers  
• Example:  In  the  past  year,  what  was  your  annual  household  income  before  taxes?  $_________  
→ Please  circle  the  number  of  children  under  18  years  of  ages  currently  living  in  your  household:  0..1……7  (If  
more  than  7  please  specify(  
→ In  the  past  seven  days,  how  many  times  did  you  go  shopping  at  a  retail  shopping  mall?  ___  of  times  
→ In  whole  years,  what  is  your  current  age?  ____  years  old  
 
Primary  Scale   Basic  Description   Scale   Common   Marketing   Permissible  
characteristics   examples   examples   Statistics  
Nominal   Numbers  identify   Description   Social  security   Brand  numbers,   Percentages,  
and  classify   numbers,  numbers   store  types,   Mode  
objects   of  football  players   gender  
classification  
Ordinal   Numbers  indicate   Description,  order   Quality  rankings,   Preference   Percentile,  mode  
the  relative   ranking  of  teams  in   rankings,  market   median  
positions  of  the   a  tournament   position,  social  
objects  but  not  the   class  
magnitude  of   [RANKING  scales]  
differences  
between  them  
Interval   Differences   Description,  order,   Temperature   Attitudes,   Range,  mean,  
between  objects   distance   (Fahrenheit,   opinions,  index   standard  deviation  
can  be  compared,   Celsius)   numbers  
zero  point  is   [RATING  scales]  
arbitrary    
Ratio   Zero  point  is  fixed;   Description,  order,   Length,  Weight   Age,  income,  costs,   Geometric  mean,  
ratios  of  scale   distance,  origin   sales,  market   all  statistics  
values  can  be   shares:  write  the  
computed   actual  value  down  
 

  31  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

A  Classification  of  Scaling  Techniques  

 
Types  of  Scaling  
Comparative:  ‘non-­‐metric  scaling’  
• Scaling  techniques  in  which  there  is  a  direct  comparison  of  stimulus  objects  with  one  another  
• e.g.  comparing  two  brands  on  product  quality  
• Only  ordinal  or  ranked  measurements  
 
Non-­‐comparative:  ‘metric  scaling’  
• Scaling  technique  in  which  each  stimulus  object  is  scaled  independently  of  the  others  
• e.g.  rating  single  brands  on  product  quality  (one  at  a  time)  rather  than  comparison  to  other  object  
• Most  widely  used  scaling  technique  in  market  research  
• Date  are  assumed  to  be  interval  
• Scales  can  be  continuous  or  itemized  

Comparative  Scaling  

Paired  comparison  
• Where  respondents  are  given  two  objects  at  a  time  and  asked  to  
select  one  on  some  criterion  
• Data  obtained  is  ordinal  in  nature  
• Most  widely  used  comparative  scaling  technique  
• Used  the  stimulus  objects  are  physical  products  
• Presents  to  company  the  frequency  of  first  preferences  
• Number  of  comparisons=    [n  (n-­‐1)/2]  (e.g.  4  brands=  6  evaluations,  5  
brands=  10  evaluations)  
• Disadvantages:    
→ May  force  people  to  choose  
→ People  can  be  indifferent  to  categories  
→ Only  produces  ordinal  level  data  
→ Can  produce  an  unwieldy  amount  of  comparisons  (10  jeans=  45  comparisons)  
→ The  order  in  which  the  alternatives  are  presented  might  bias  the  results  
→ Consumers  may  prefer  one  to  another  however  this  doesn’t  not  imply  that  they  hate  the  other  alternative  

Rank  Order  
• Respondents  are  given  several  objects  at  the  same  time  and  asked  to  
order  them  according  to  a  criterion  
• Second  most  popular  comparative  scaling  technique  
• Results  in  ordinal  data  
• Represents  the  shopping  environment  more  than  paired  comparisons,  takes  less  time  
• Easily  understood  and  results  are  easy  to  communicate  
• Commonly  used  to  measure  preferences  as  well  as  attributed  
• Disadvantages:    
  32  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

→ It  is  possible  that  even  the  brand  ranked  1  is  not  liked  in  an  abosulte  sense  
→ No  distance  properties  (can’t  tell  how  far  or  close  the  dislike  between  flake  and  mars  is  etc.)  

Constant  Sum  Scaling  


• Respondents  are  required  to  allocate  a  constant  sum  of  units  amongst  
objects  with  respect  to  a  criterion  
• The  points  are  allocated  to  represent  the  importance  attached  to  each  
attribute  
• Attributes  are  scaled  by  counting  the  points  assigned  to  each  one,  and  
dividing  by  number  of  respondents  
• Ordinal  in  nature  as  allocation  of  points  is  influenced  by  attributes/answers  
included  
• Advantages:  allows  for  fine  discrimination  among  alternatives  and  does  not  require  too  much  time  
• Disadvantages:  
→ The  results  are  not  generalizable  or  applicable  to  other  objects  not  included  in  the  study  
→ Respondents  can  miss-­‐add  points-­‐  the  researcher  then  must  adjust  the  data  to  100  or  eliminate  the  
respondent  from  analysis  

Relative  Advantages  and  Disadvantages  of  Comparative  Scales  


• Advantages:  
→ Small  differences  between  objects  under  study  can  be  detected  
→ Easy  to  understand  and  apply  
→ Reduces  halo  or  carry  over  effects:  when  earlier  questions  effect  later  responses  
→ We  aren’t  making  any  assumptions  in  terms  of  the  classification  set  (e.g.  we  aren’t  assuming  what  respondents  
are  using  to  define  if  a  Mars  Bars  is  good  on  its  own-­‐  we  know  they  are  comparing  it  in  terms  of  a  Freddo)  
• Disadvantages:    
→ Forces  respondent  to  choose  between  two  items,  particularly  on  ones  they  are  indifferent  about  
→ Respondents  may  not  have  the  background  knowledge  to  make  a  comparison  
→ Inability  to  generalize  between  the  brands  and  products  you  are  comparing  
→ These  disadvantages  can  be  overcome  by  non-­‐comparative  scaling  techniques  (Chapter  10)  
 
Diagram  page  295  

Acronyms  
The  four  primary  types  of  scales  can  be  described  as  FOUR  
• F  igurative:  norminal  scale  
• O  rdinal  scale  
• U  nconstrained  zero  point:  interval  scale  
• R  atio  scale  
 
The  different  comparative  and  non  comparative  scales  can  be  represented  by  SCALES  
• S  emantic  differential  scale  
• C  onstant  sum  scale  
• A  rranged  in  order;  rank  order  scale  
• L  ikert  scale  
• E  ngaged:  paired  comparison  scale  
• S  tapel  scale  
 

MKTG  2305  Chapter  10  Summary:  Measurement  and  Scaling:  Non-­‐


comparative  Scaling  Techniques  
A  Classification  of  Non-­‐Comparative  Rating  Scales  
• Non-­‐comparative  scaling  techniques:  each  stimulus  is  scaled  
independently  of  other  objects  in  the  stimulus  set.  Often  called  
a  monadic  scale.  

  33  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Continuous  Rating  Scale  


• Respondents  rate  the  objects  by  placing  a  mark  at  the  appropriate  position  on  a  line  that  runs  from  one  extreme  of  the  
criterion  variable  to  the  other.    
• The  form  of  the  continuous  scale  may  vary  considerably  

Some  Unique  Rating  Scale  Configurations  


Thermometer  Scale  
• Instructions:  please  indication  how  much  you  like  
McDonald’s  hamburgers  by  coloring  in  the  
thermometer.  Start  at  the  bottom  and  colour  up  
to  the  temperature  level  that  best  indicates  how  
strong  your  preference  is.  
 
Smiling  Face  Scale  
• Instructions:  please  point  to  the  face  that  shows  
how  much  you  like  the  Barbie  Doll.  If  you  do  not  like  the  Barbie  Doll  at  all,  you  would  point  to  Face  1.  If  you  liked  it  very  
much  you  would  point  to  Face  5.  

Itemized  Rating  Scales  


• The  respondents  are  provided  with  a  scale  that  has  a  number  or  brief  description  associated  with  each  category  
• The  categories  are  ordered  in  terms  of  scale  position,  and  the  respondents  are  required  to  select  the  specified  category  
that  best  describes  the  object  being  rated  
• The  commonly  used  itemized  rating  scales  are  the  Likert,  Semantic  Differential  and  Stapel  scales  
 
Likert  Scale  
• The  Likert  Scale  requires  the  respondents  to  indicate  the  degree  of  
agreement  or  disagreement  with  each  of  a  series  of  statements  about  
the  stimulus  objects-­‐  from  “strongly  agree”  to  “strongly  disagree”  
• The  analysis  can  be  conducted  by  an  item-­‐on-­‐item  basis  (profile  
analysis),  or  a  total  (summated)  score  can  be  calculate  
• When  arrive  at  a  total  score,  the  categories  assigned  to  the  negative  
statements  by  the  respondents  should  be  scored  by  reversing  the  scale  
• They  put  in  some  negative  questions  to  check  if  respondents  are  just  
continuously  checking  a  box  
• Interval  scale  
 
Semantic  Differential  Scale  
• The  Semantic  differential  is  a  seven-­‐point  scale  with  end  points  
associated  with  bipolar  labels  that  have  semantic  meaning  
• The  negative  adjective  or  phrase  sometimes  appears  at  the  left  side  of  
the  scale  and  sometimes  at  the  right.    
• This  controls  the  tendency  of  some  respondents,  particularly  those  with  very  positive  or  very  negative  attitudes,  to  
mark  the  right-­‐  or  left-­‐hand  sides  without  reading  the  labels.    
• Individual  items  on  a  semantic  differential  scale  may  be  scored  on  either  a  -­‐3  to  +3  or  a  1  to  
7  scale.    
• Results  are  treated  as  interval  data  and  analyzed  using  profile  analysis-­‐  mean  or  median  are  
calculated  plotted  and  statistically  analyses  
• Differences  across  respondent  groups  can  be  compared  
 
Stapel  Scale  
• Consists  of  a  single  adjective  in  the  middle  of  an  even-­‐numbered  range  of  values  
• The  Stapel  Scale  is  a  unipolar  rating  scale  with  ten  categories  numbered  from  -­‐5  to  +5,  
without  a  neutral  point  (zero).  This  scale  is  usually  presented  vertically  
• The  data  obtained  by  using  a  Stapel  scale  can  be  analyzed  in  the  same  way  as  semantic  
differential  data  and  is  treated  as  interval  data  
 
 
 
 

  34  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Scale   Basic   Examples   Advantages   Disadvantages  


Characteristics  
Continuous   Place  a  mark  on  a   Reactions  to  TV   Easy  to  construct   Scoring  can  be  difficult  and  unreliable  
Rating  Scales   continuous  line   commercials   unless  they  are  presented  on  a  computer  
screen  

Itemized  Rating  Scale  


Likert  Scale   Degree  of   Measurement  of   Easy  for  the  researcher   Takes  longer  to  complete  than  other  
agreement  on  a  1   attitudes   to  understand   itemized  rating  scales-­‐  respondents  have  
(strongly   Suitable  for  mail,   to  read  entire  statement  rather  than  
disagree)  to  a  5   telephone,  personal  or   short  phrase  
(strongly  agree)   electronic  interviews.    
scale   Difficult  to  interpret  the  response  to  a  
Likert  item-­‐  especially  if  it  is  an  
unfavorable  statement  (reversing  an  
item  doesn’t  have  some  meaning)  

Semantial   7-­‐point  scale  with   Brand,  product  and   Versatility   Difficult  to  construct  appropriate  bi-­‐polar  
Differential   bipolar  labels   company  images   adjectives  (e.g  opposite  of  calm)  

Stapel  Scale   Uni-­‐polar  10-­‐ Measurement  of   Only  using  one  adjective   Can  be  seen  as  difficult  and  confusing  to  
point  scale,  -­‐5  to   attitudes  and  images   has  an  advantage  of   apply  
+5  without  a   semantic  differentials  in  
neutral  point   that  no  pretest  is  needed  
(zero)   to  assure  the  adjectives  
are  direct  opposites  
 
Simplicity  of  
construction  lends  itself  
to  telephone  
interviewing  
 
The  advantages  of  this  
scale  warrant  wider  
applications  than  have  
been  made  in  the  pasts  

Example:  MKTG  2305  


• Using  a  Likert  and  Stapel  Scale  develop  a  question  that  would  provide  information  on  overall  student  satisfaction  with  
this  course?  
→ Likert:  I’m  satisfied  with  the  overall  quality  of  this  course  [Strongly  disagree  to  Strongly  agree]  
→ Stapel:  put  ‘high  satisfaction’  as  objective  in  the  middle  [+5  to  -­‐5]  
• What  type  of  scale  is  this  (NOIR)  and  what  type  of  descriptive  analysis  could  we  use?  
→ Both  are  interval  scales  
→ Mode,  Median,  Mean  
• What  scales  could  you  use  to  directly  compare  this  unit  with  other  third  year  marketing  units  
→ Non-­‐comparative  scales  
 
 
 
 

  35  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Non  Comparative  Itemized  Rating-­‐Scale  Decisions  


Design  Factor   Guidelines  
Number  of  categories   While  there  is  no  single  optimal  number,  traditional  guidelines  suggest  there  should  be  between  5  
to  9  categories  
Sensitivity  of  the  scale  is  the  ability  to  detect  subtle  differences  in  the  attitude  or  characteristic  
being  measured  
Increasing  the  number  of  scale  categories  increases  sensitivity-­‐  but  don’t  want  too  many  categories  
or  it  increase  information  processing  demands  on  respondents  
Balanced  vs.  Unbalanced   In  general  the  scale  should  be  balances  to  obtain  objective  data  
Balanced  scale:  a  scale  with  an  equal  number  of  favourable  and  unfavorable  categories  (may  have  
a  neutral  category  in  the  middle)  
Odd  vs.  even  number  of   If  the  researcher  has  reason  to  believe  that  a  portion  of  the  respondent  population  is  actually  
categories   neutral  on  a  particular  subject,  an  odd  number  of  categories  should  be  used-­‐one  of  which  being  a  
neutral  response  to  measure  this  
If  the  researcher  wants  to  force  a  response  or  believes  there  is  no  neutral  or  indifferent  response  
than  an  even  number  should  exist  
Forced  vs.  non-­‐forced   In  situations  where  the  respondents  are  expected  to  have  no  opinion,  the  accuracy  of  the  data  may  
be  improved  by  a  non-­‐forced  scale-­‐  provides  an  option  of  “no  opinion”,  if  one  was  not  provided  
this  would  distort  measures  of  central  tendency  and  variance  
Verbal  description   An  argument  can  be  made  for  labeling  all  or  many  scale  categories.  The  category  definitions  should  
be  located  as  close  to  the  response  categories  as  possible  to  reduce  ambiguity.  
The  strength  of  the  adjectives  used  to  anchor  the  scale  effect  the  responses-­‐  strong  anchors  
(completely  agree  etc.)  will  result  in  more  responses  toward  the  mid  point  whereas  weak  anchors  
(general  agree)  produce  uniform  or  flat  distributions-­‐  depends  on  knowledge  of  the  distribution  of  
the  characteristic  being  measured  along  with  the  objectives  of  the  study  
Physical  Form   A  number  of  options  should  be  tried  and  the  best  one  selected-­‐  vertically  vs.  horizontally,  boxes,  
discrete  lines,  units  on  a  continuum,  have  numbers  assigned;  Scale  descriptors  (very  dissatisfied,  
definitely  will  not  buy  etc.)  

Developing  a  multi-­‐item  scale  


• The  Likert,  Semantic  Differential  and  Stapel  Scales  presented  earlier  to  measure  attitudes  towards  Macy’s  are  examples  
of  multi-­‐item  scales:  a  scale  consisting  of  multiple  items,  where  an  item  is  a  single  question  or  statement  to  be  
evaluated.  
• Developing  multiple-­‐item  scales  requires  considerable  technical  expertise  
 

Scale  Evaluation  
• A  multi-­‐item  scale  should  be  evaluated  for  reliability  and  validity  (diagram  page  317)  
• Total  measurement  error  is  the  sum  of  systematic  error  and  random  error  
→ Systematic  error:  affects  the  measurement  in  a  constant  way  and  represents  stable  factors  that  affect  the  
observed  score  in  the  same  way  each  time  the  measurement  is  made  
→ Random  error:  arises  from  random  changes  that  have  a  different  effect  each  time  the  measurement  is  made.  

Reliability  
• Reliability  can  be  defined  as  the  extent  to  which  measures  are  free  from  random  error  
→ The  extent  to  which  a  scale  produces  consistent  results  if  repeated  measurements  are  made  of  the  
characteristic  
• Popular  approaches  for  assessing  reliability:  
→  Test-­‐retest  reliability:  respondents  are  administered  identical  sets  of  scale  items  at  two  different  times  under  
as  nearly  equivalent  conditions  as  possible.  The  higher  the  degree  of  similarity  the  greater  the  reliability  
→ Alternative  forms  of  reliability:  an  approach  for  assessing  reliability  that  requires  two  equivalent  forms  of  the  
scale  to  be  constructed,  and  then  measures  the  same  respondents  at  two  different  times  using  the  alternate  
forms.  Correlation  between  alternate  forms=  reliability  
→ Internal-­‐consistency  reliability:  used  to  assess  the  reliability  of  the  summated  scale  and  which  refers  to  the  
consistency  with  which  each  item  represents  the  construct  of  interest.  
o Split-­‐half  reliability:  a  form  of  internal  consistency  reliability  in  which  the  items  contributing  the  scale  
are  divided  into  two  halves  and  the  resulting  half  scores  are  correlated  (e.g.  some  will  be  given  a  
negative  statement  and  some  a  positive)  

  36  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)


lOMoARcPSD|2838134

Validity  
• The  validity  of  a  scale  may  be  defined  as  the  extent  to  which  differences  in  observed  scale  scores  reflect  true  
differences  among  objects  on  the  characteristic  being  measured,  rather  than  systematic  or  random  errors.    
• Researchers  can  assess  validity  in  different  ways:  
→ Content  validity:  sometimes  called  face  validity,  involves  a  systematic  but  subjective  assessment  of  how  well  a  
scale  measures  the  construct  or  variable  of  interest    
→ Criterion  validity:  reflects  whether  a  scale  performs  as  expected  given  other  variables  considered  relevant  to  
the  construct  (criterion  variables)  such  as  demographic  and  psychographic  variables.  
→ Construct  validity:  addresses  the  question  of  what  construct  or  characteristic  the  scale  is,  in  fact  measuring-­‐  
requires  that  the  researcher  must  have  a  strong  understanding  of  the  theory  that  provided  the  basis  for  
constructing  the  scale  
o Convergent  validity:  is  the  extent  to  which  the  scale  correlated  positively  with  other  measures  of  the  
same  construct  
o Discriminant  validity:  the  extent  to  which  a  measure  does  not  correlate  with  other  constructs  from  
which  it  is  supposed  to  differ  
o Nomological  validity:  the  extent  to  which  the  scale  correlates  in  theoretically  predicted  ways  with  
measures  of  different  but  related  constructs  

Relationship  between  reliability  and  validity  


• Perfect  validity  requires  that  there  be  no  measurement  error  [accurate]  
• If  a  measure  is  perfectly  valid  it  is  also  perfectly  reliable.    
• If  a  measure  is  unreliable  it  is  invalid  
• Reliability  is  a  necessary,  but  not  sufficient,  condition  for  validity  as  systematic  error  might  still  be  present.  

Choosing  a  scaling  technique  


• Choosing  an  appropriate  technique  should  consider  factors  such  as:  
→ Level  of  measurement  desired  (NOIR)  
→ The  experience  of  respondents  with  the  research  topic  
→ The  difficulty  of  administering  the  scales  
→ The  context  
• The  general  rule  is  to  select  the  lowest  level  of  measurement  that  will  enable  the  researcher  to  obtain  the  needed  
information  and  conduct  the  appropriate  statistical  analyses  
• Using  multiple  scale  items  to  measure  the  same  characteristic  will  improve  the  accuracy  of  results.  
• Desirable  to  use  more  than  one  scaling  technique  
 
Diagram  page  321  

Acronym  
The  rating  scale  decisions  may  be  described  as  RATING  
• R  esponse  option:  forced  versus  nonforced  
• A  trractive  versus  unattracted  number  of  categories:  balanced  versus  unbalanced  
• T  otal  number  of  categories  
• I  mpartial  or  Neurtal  category:  odd  versus  even  number  of  categories  
• N  ature  and  Degree  of  verbal  description  
• G  raphics:  physical  form  and  configuration  
 
 
 
 
 

  37  

Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by deniz aa (1002140050@ogr.iu.edu.tr)

Anda mungkin juga menyukai