Anda di halaman 1dari 16

System. Appl. Microbiol.

24, 572–587 (2001)


© Urban & Fischer Verlag
http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/sam

A Polyphasic Taxonomic Study of Thermophilic Bacilli from


Shallow, Marine Vents
TERESA L. MAUGERI1, CONCETTA GUGLIANDOLO1, DANIELA CACCAMO1, and ERKO STACKEBRANDT2
1
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale ed Ecologia Marina, Sez. Ecologia Microbica e Biotecnologie, Messina, Italy
2
DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany

Received July 17, 2001

Summary
Eighty-seven thermophilic, aerobic, spore-forming bacteria were isolated from shallow, marine, thermal
vents of the Eolian Islands (Italy) and tested for a broad spectrum of phenotypic characteristics. A nu-
merical taxonomy study was performed on these isolates and 8 thermophilic Bacillus and Geobacillus
reference strains by 89 selected features. Results from cluster analysis showed the formation of nine clus-
ters. Most of the isolates (83%) fell into several phenetically well distinguished clusters, loosely related to
Geobacillus thermodenitrificans. The remaining isolates grouped together with different reference
strains. Eighteen isolates, representative of the different clusters, were selected for subsequent genotypic
characterisation, including partial 16S rDNA sequence analysis of 18 strains and almost complete 16S
rDNA sequences of 9 strains. Subsequent DNA/DNA reassociation studies and determination of the base
composition of DNA identified seven isolates as Geobacillus thermodenitrificans, two isolates as G. ther-
moleovorans and one isolate as Bacillus pallidus. Four isolates represented two novel species of Bacillus.
The remaining four represented novel Geobacillus species, one of which has recently been described as
Bacillus vulcani DSMZ 13174 T.

Key words: shallow hydrothermal vents – thermophilic bacilli – phenetic diversity – numerical analysis –
genotypic characterization – novel Geobacillus species – novel Bacillus species

Introduction
Thermophilic bacteria belonging to the genus Bacillus On the basis of 16S rRNA sequence analysis of the
are able to grow at or above 60 °C showing optimal genus Bacillus it was shown that most thermophilic
growth temperatures in the range ≥45– ≤70 °C. Most of species are members of Bacillus rRNA group 5 (ASH
the high temperature bacilli have been isolated from hot et al., 1991; RAINEY et al., 1994), the majority of which
environments (hot springs, solfataras or geothermally have recently been reclassified as Geobacillus (NAZINA
heated soils) or from man-made thermal systems (hot et al., 2001): Geobacillus stearothermophilus, G. ther-
water pipelines, heat exchangers, waste treatment plants, moglucosidasius, G. thermodenitrificans (MANACHINI
burning coal refuse piles), while thermotolerant bacilli et al., 2000), G. kaustophilus, G. thermocatenulatus and
may be isolated from both thermophilic and mesophilic G. thermoleovorans. The latter species embraces the in-
environments, including soil samples, composting vegeta- valid species “B. caldolyticus”, “B. caldotenax” and
tion, sewage digester, river-, lake- and sea-water. They “B. caldovelox” (SUNNA et al., 1997). Other members of
have been also isolated from shallow water marine hot Bacillus rRNA group 5 are “B. thermoantarcticus”
springs and from deep-sea hydrothermal vents (HJÖR- (NICOLAUS et al., 1996) and B. vulcani, (CACCAMO et al.,
LEIFSDOTTIR et al., 1989; MARTEINSSON et al., 1996). 2000) as well as Saccharococcus thermophilus and S. cal-
The first publication on the characterisation of an aer- doxylosilyticus (AHMAD et al., 2000).
obic spore-former able to grow at 70 °C, Bacillus ther- The interest for these bacteria arises from their
mophilus, was carried out by MIQUEL in 1888. Since then biotechnological importance as sources of themostable
several reports on thermophilic Bacillus strains have been enzymes (proteases, amylases, pullulanases, glucose-iso-
published (GORDON and SMITH, 1949; SHARP et al., 1992; merases, lipases, xylanases and DNA restriction endonu-
WHITE et al., 1993). cleases) and products for industrial use, such exopolysac-

0723-2020/01/24/04-572 $ 15.00/0
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 573

charides or compatible solutes (HARWOOD, 1989; SHARP Optimal growth was evaluated by measuring the increase in
et al., 1992). turbidity at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer (Ultraspec 3000,
This paper is the first report on the isolation and char- Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK).
acterisation of thermophilic bacilli from different shal- Biochemical characteristics were screened by test strips of
API system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, FR). The first 11 tests
low, marine thermal vents located around the Eolian Is- in the API 20 E and 49 tests in the API 50 CHB (acid production
lands (Italy). We describe here the biodiversity of the iso- from carbohydrates) were used. Constitutive enzyme production
lates by numerical analysis of their phenotypic features in was tested by the API ZYM according to SHARP et al. (1980). Ni-
comparison with 8 thermophilic Bacillus and Geobacillus trate reduction and carbohydrate assimilation were detected by
reference strains. This approach has been followed by the the API 20 NE. Strips were incubated at 55 °C in a plastic bag
genotypic characterisation of 18 selected isolates. onto a bed of wet cotton in order to minimise evaporation. Re-
sults were scored reading at 12 and 24h (LOGAN and BERKE-
LEY,1984).
Materials and Methods Utilization of glucose (0.6% w/v), sucrose (0.6% w/v), carra-
genan (0.1 % w/v) as sole carbon source was tested adding the
Sampling sites carbohydrates to MD agar deprived of tryptone. Growth was
The Eolian Islands represent an arc of volcanic origin where scored after 3 days of incubation at optimal temperature.
submarine hot waters and gases flow from the sea-floor at vari- Starch, casein and tributyrin hydrolysis was tested according
ous depths. The sites of the collection of samples in shallow, to MARTEINSSON et al. (1996); xylan and dextran hydrolysis was
submarine volcanic systems were located at different depths tested according to WHITE et al. (1993).
around the Eolian Islands (Italy) (GUGLIANDOLO et al., 1999). Lipolytic activity on Tween 20 and Tween 80 was tested on
Water and sediment samples were collected at different shal- Sierra agar modified (DEGRYSE et al., 1978).
low marine thermal vents during an oceanographic cruise To assess possible error, tests were performed in duplicate on
(September 1996) around Eolian Islands. Sampling was made by 18 random strains (SNEATH and JOHNSON, 1972).
SCUBA divers using sterile sampler (GUGLIANDOLO et al., 1999).
Sites depth, temperature and pH were immediately recorded by Cluster analysis
a multiparameter probe. Results obtained were arranged in a binary data matrix and
analysed using the Sokal and Michener (SSM) and Jaccard (J)
Enrichment and isolation similarity coefficients together with the unweighted pair group
All samples were immediately treated aboard ship. The en- method with arithmetic average algorithm (UPGMA) (SNEATH and
richment of aerobic, heterotrophic, thermophilic bacteria was SOKAL, 1973). Cophenetic correlation values were determined
obtained using the following protocol. Water samples were fil- for the two dendrograms obtained using the NTSYS-PC © 1.70
tered through 0.45 mm membrane filters. Filters were inoculat- program (1992 – Exeter Software, Applied Biostatistics Inc,
ed into Bacto Marine Broth 2216 (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) and New York).
liquid Medium D (MD) (DEGRYSE et al., 1978) or placed onto
plates of Bacto Marine Agar 2216 (Difco) (MA) and MD agar. Genotypic studies
The media were incubated at 65 °C for three days in aerobic Randomly selected strains from different clusters were subse-
conditions. Isolation was made on the same media supplement- quently studied for genotypic characteristics.
ed with agar (2%). All colonies obtained on Petri dishes were
picked and purified by streaking on MA at least three times. Se- Determination of DNA mol % G+C content
rial dilutions of sediment samples were treated by the same The DNA was isolated according to CASHION et al. (1977).
method. The mol% G+C was determined by HPLC as described by MES-
BAH et al. (1989).
Reference strains
The following thermophilic strains of Bacillus rRNA group 5 16S rDNA sequence determination and analysis
were included as reference strains: G. stearothermophilus DSM Genomic DNA extraction, 16S rDNA amplification via PCR
22T, G. thermocatenulatus DSM 730T, G. thermodenitrificans and sequencing of the purified products were performed accord-
DSM 465T, G. thermoleovorans DSM 5366T, G. kaustophilus ing to RAINEY et al. (1996). Sequence reaction mixture was elec-
DSM 7263 as well as three strains, which were recently pro- trophoresed by using a model 373A automated DNA sequencer
posed as members of G. thermoleovorans (SUNNA et al., 1997), (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, California, USA). The 16S
namely, “B. caldolyticus” DSM 405, “B. caldotenax” DSM rDNA sequences obtained were manually aligned with reference
406, and “B. caldovelox” DSM 411. sequences of Bacillus and Geobacillus spp. using the ae2 editor
(MAIDAK et al., 1999). Evolutionary distances were calculated by
Phenotypic studies the method of JUKES and CANTOR (1969). For partial sequences
All phenotypic tests were made in triplicate and repeated dendrograms were generated by the distance analysis methods
when inconsistent results were observed. All growth tests, unless of DE SOETE (1983) and SAITOU and NEI contained in the PHYLIP
otherwise specified, were performed at 55 °C. package (FELSENSTEIN, 1993). Phylogenetic clustering of almost
Gram- and spore-staining, observation of motility, test of ox- complete sequences were done by neighbour-joining and maxi-
idase and catalase activity, were performed as described by SMIB- mum-likelihood methods (FELSENSTEIN, 1993). Bootstrap analy-
ERT and KRIEG (1994). sis, following a Kimura-2 correction of similarity values
Temperature and pH range for growth was determined fol- (FELSENSTEIN, 1988) by performing 100 resamplings, was used
lowing incubation of the strains for 3 days at 37, 45, 55, 60, 65, to evaluate the tree topology of the maximum-likelihood den-
70 and 75 °C and pH 5.5, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0 in Bacto Marine drograms.
Broth (Difco).
Halotolerance was tested after 3 days of incubation in Bacto DNA-DNA hybridisation
Nutrient Broth supplemented with 0, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10% (w/v) The DNA was isolated as described by CASHION et al. (1977).
NaCl. DNA-DNA hybridisations were carried out according to DE LEY
574 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

et al. (1970), with the modifications proposed by HUB et al. Phenotypic studies
(1983), in a Gilford System model 2600 spectrophotometer
equipped with a Gilford model 2527-R thermoprogrammer and All 87 strains were rod-shaped, Gram positive, spore
plotter. The renaturation rates were determined by the Transfer forming and grew aerobically at 55 °C, reaching the ex-
BAS program (JAHNKE, 1992). ponential growth phase within 18 h. Seventy- seven
strains were able to grow at 60 °C, 65 strains at 65 °C
and 10 strains at 70 °C. Salt was not required for growth
Results and Discussion by 59 strains. All strains grew with 2–3% NaCl, 23
strains grew with 5% NaCl, six with 7% NaCl and only
Sampling and isolation one strain with 10% NaCl. Almost all strains grew at
neutral or slightly alkaline pH. All strains were positive
Eighty-seven strains, 54 from venting-water and 33 for gelatin hydrolysis and most strains were positive for
from sediment close to the vents, were isolated from col- esculin hydrolysis. Most strains fermented ribose, fruc-
lected samples. tose, maltose, keto-gluconate, and grew on sucrose

Table 1. Designation and source of the 87 isolates and eight reference strains assigned to clusters, or unclustered, defined at 68–80%
SSM/UPGMA level (in bold, strains selected for genotypic characterization).

Cluster (n°of strains) Strain Source or Site of isolate

a (13) A1-3, A2, S1, S1-1, T1-3,B3s5, B3-1,


B3-72, B3-73, B3-74, B2-71, B3s, B3-75 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
b (28) B1-1, B1-2, B2-1, B2-2, B2-3, B2-4, B2-5, Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
B3, B3-5, B3-15, B3-22, B3-29, s1b-1a,
T2a, T3-3, B3-s1, B3-s2, T2-2, T2-3, T3-2
3s-2 La Roya, Vulcano Island
s5s-1, s5s-2, 12-2, S12-1a Inzolfata, Lipari Island
10-15, g10 Zurro, Stromboli
g11-2 Ginostra, Stromboli
c (2) S7s1, 7s La Calcara, Panarea
d (16) B2-70, B3-76,T1-1, T1-4, T2, T2-1, T2-4, Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
T2-6, T3-1, T1, T3 Punta Conigliara, Vulcano Island
4-4, 4-5, 4-6 Inzolfata, Lipari Island
5-1, 5-2
e (4) 1b-2, 1as Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
4-1, 4s-1 Punta Conigliara, Vulcano Island
f (2) A3, S3 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
g (6) A1, S2 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
5s, 5s-2 Inzolfata, Lipari Island
S7-5 La Calcara, Panarea
10-16 Zurro, Stromboli
G. thermodenitrificans (DSM 465T)
h (20) “B. caldotenax” (DSM 406)
“B. caldolyticus” (DSM 405)
T3-4 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
U4-4 Punta Conigliara, Vulcano Island
10-1 Zurro, Stromboli
12-1 Inzolfata, Lipari Island
“B. caldovelox” (DSM 411)
G. thermoleovorans (DSM 5366 T)
1b-4, 1a-1, 1a-2, 1a-3 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
3s-1, 3s, M3s La Roya, Vulcano Island
M4, M4-1, 4-2 Punta Conigliara
G. thermocatenulatus (DSM 730 T)
B. kaustophilus (DSM 7263 T)
i (2) 1bw Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
G. stearothermophilus (DSM 22T)
Unclustered strain B3s-3 Porto di Levante, Vulcano Island
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 575

(0.6%), carragenan, dextran and xylan. Almost all pos- They were able to hydrolyse starch and casein and only
sessed phosphatase alkaline and acid, butyrate and capry- two strains reduced nitrates.
late esterase, Tween 20 and Tween 80 lipase, casein and Cluster f (SSM ≥ 78%) comprised two strains from site
tributyrin hydrolase. U1, strictly thermophilic and able to hydrolyse starch.
All strains were negative for arginine dehydrolase, ly- Cluster g (SSM ≥ 70%) comprised six isolates. They dif-
sine and ornithine decarboxylase, urease and H2S produc- fered from other isolates in Group A in their ability to
tion; caprate was not utilised; D-arabinose, L-xylose, ferment glucose, fructose, mannose, mannitol, sorbitol,
adonitol, rhamnose, dulcitol, inulin, xylitol, and fucose sucrose and trehalose. Moreover, they were unable to hy-
were not fermented. drolyse casein and starch.
Error based on mismatches of results of the duplicate In Group B, cluster h (SSM ≥ 68%) comprised twenty
strains was estimated at 5.5%. strains, six of which were reference strains (G. ther-
moleovorans, G. kaustophilus, G. thermocatenulatus,
“B. caldotenax”, “B. caldolyticus” and “B. caldovelox”).
Cluster analysis
Most strains assimilated mannose, N-acetyl-glucosamine
The final n × t matrix included 95 strains (87 isolates and maltose and were able to use citrate and ferment
and 8 reference strains) and 89 selected tests. Data arising fructose, maltose, mannose, sucrose, D-xylose, trehalose
from growth tests at different conditions and antibiotic and starch.
sensitivity were not used for the numerical analysis. Cluster i comprised G. stearothermophilus and one
Cophenetic values were 0.81 and 0.73 for SSM and field strain, strictly thermophilic and halophilic, linked at
SJ/UPGMA analysis, respectively. Given the relatively 68% similarity level.
high cophenetic correlation values, detailed results are Table 1 lists the designation and source of the 87 iso-
presented for the SSM /UPGMA analysis. lates and eight reference strains assigned to clusters or
Two main groups (A and B), which were separated at constituting individual lineages on the basis of ≥ 68%
63% similarity level, emerged in the dendrogram result- SSM/UPGMA similarity values.
ing from cluster analysis (Fig. 1). Group A included most Table 2 (a, b, c) shows physiological/biochemical char-
of the isolates (72), linking with G. thermodenitrificans acteristics of the multi-membered clusters of isolates and
DSM 465T at 65% similarity level. Group B included 15 reference strains.
isolates and the remaining 7 reference strains linked at
67% similarity level. Several strains (8/15) of this group
Genotypic studies
clustered around G. thermoleovorans DSM 5366 at 70%
similarity level. Eighteen representative strains were randomly selected
Any aggregation at ≥ 68% similarity level on the dendro- from the 87 previously analysed by cluster analysis. The
gram was considered as a different cluster. The rational for main phenotypic properties of these 18 isolates are
this cut off value was based on the finding that strains affili- shown in Table 3 in comparison with those of three relat-
ated to the species G. thermoleovorans by high DNA-DNA ed Geobacillus reference strains (data from literature).
reassociation similarities, namely “B. caldolyticus” DSM
405, “B. caldotenax” DSM 406, “B. caldovelox” DSM
DNA base composition
411, G. kaustophilus DSM 7263 and G. thermocatenulatus
DSM 730 (SUNNA et al., 1997) were linked at 68% similari- The mol% G + C content of DNA of the 18 isolates
ty level (AUSTIN and PRIEST, 1986) in the present study. ranged from 39 to 53%, as shown in Table 3.
Six multimembered (a, b, d, e, g, h) and three double-
membered (c, f, i) clusters of isolates were recovered at
Phylogenetic position
≥ 68% SSM (Fig. 1). Only one strain in Group A remained
unclustered. As the previous characterisation indicated a high vari-
In Group A, the cluster a was defined at 78% SSM level ability of their phenotypic properties, partial 16S rDNA
and comprised 13 isolates from site U1 (Vulcano). Most sequences (position 5′ terminus to about position 500)
of them were positive for lipolytic activity on Tween 20 were generated for the 18 selected strains. Binary similar-
and Tween 80 and for nitrate reduction. Eight strains hy- ity values indicated that some strains were phylogeneti-
drolysed starch. cally very similar, some of which were closely related to
Cluster b (SSM ≥ 78%) was the largest one, comprising some Geobacillus and Bacillus reference strains. The
28 isolates from water and sediment. Most isolates were topology of the neighbour-joining tree indicated the pres-
thermotolerant and halotolerant, and were also able to ence of five strains groups (I–V) (Fig. 2), two of which (I,
reduce nitrates. II) included members of the Geobacillus/Saccharococcus
Cluster c (SSM ≥ 88%) comprised two halophilic iso- rRNA group 5 (ASH et al., 1991; RAINEY et al., 1994).
lates from site U7. Group I, harbouring 10 isolates, was divided in two
Cluster d (SSM ≥ 75%) comprised 16 isolates, showing subgroups. In subgroup Ia, sequences of isolates A1 and
lipolytic activity on Tween 20. They were all unable to S3 were identical while those of strains A2, B3, T2, B3s
ferment most carbohydrates. and B3-1 were almost identical to the sequence of G.
Cluster e (SSM ≥ 80%) comprised four isolates more thermodenitrificans. Subgroup Ib consisted of strains 4-2,
inert than other strains in carbohydrates fermentation. 3s-1 and 3s-2, sharing identical sequences with that of G.
576 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Fig. 1. Simplified dendrogram based on simple matching coefficient (SSM) showing phenotypic relationships among the 87 field
strains and 8 thermophilic Bacillus and Geobacillus reference strains (on the right, in bold, strains selected for genotypic characteri-
zation).

kaustophilus and its close relatives G. stearo- moglucosidasius and some undescribed thermophilic iso-
thermophilus, G. thermoleovorans, “B. caldotenax”, “B. lates, Bacillus strain ICP 56 and Bacillus strain Ak1.
caldolyticus”, and G. thermocatenulatus. Group III contained strain 5s, closely related to B. pal-
Group II showed strains 5-2, 10-1, and 1bw to form a lidus, “B. thermoalkalophilus” and Bacillus sp. DSM
moderately related strains cluster adjacent to G. ther- 2349, a strain of B. pallidus (WHITE et al., 1993).
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 577

Table 2a. Characteristics of clusters arising from numerical analysis.

Legend: Within columns, number of positive strains when different from all positive (+) or negative (–). Responses of strains within double-
membered clusters (c, f, i), or unclustered, are not showed except for the reference strains DSM 22 and DSM 465.
§
DSM 465T – G. thermodenitrificans; DSM 405 – “B. caldolyticus”; DSM 406 – “B. caldotenax”; DSM 411 – “B. caldovelox”; DSM 5366T –
G. thermoleovorans; DSM 730T – G. thermocatenulatus; DSM 7263T – G. kaustophilus; DSM 22T – G. stearothermophilus. Strain DSM 5366
is the type strain of the species G. thermoleovorans which embraces also strains DSM 405, 406, 411, 730, 7263 (SUNNA et al., 1997); results are
given separately for the 6 strains in order to show the phenotypic heterogeneity of this species. Data for all reference strains were obtained at
our laboratory.
* Characters not selected for numerical analysis.
578 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Table 2b.
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 579

Table 2 (c)
580 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree showing


the relationships of the 18 selected
strains, representative of ther-
mophilic bacilli isolated from the
Eolian Islands, to described ther-
mophilic Bacillus and Geobacillus
species.

Group IV harboured strains T3 and 4-1, sharing iden- 3s-1, 4-2), three from group II (strains 5-2, 10-1, 1bw),
tical partial 16S rDNA sequences, which were distantly one from group III (strains 5s), one from group IV (strain
related to B. methanolicus. 4-1) and one from group V (strain 1as). The extension of
Group V included strains 1as and 7s, sharing identical the information from about 500 nucleotides to 1450 nu-
partial 16S rDNA sequences, which were distantly related cleotides did not significantly change the overall picture
to B. infernus and some temperate Bacillus species. of relatedness (not shown).
In order to determine more precisely the phylogenetic The similarity values obtained for almost complete se-
position of those strains which were not identical to de- quences (Table 4) indicated that strain A2 (subgroup Ia)
scribed Geobacillus and Bacillus species, the almost com- was nearly identical (99.7%) to G. thermodenitrificans
plete (1450 nucleotides) 16S rDNA sequence of nine and similar to G. stearothermophilus (98.4%) and mem-
strains was determined: three from group I (strains A2, bers of G. thermoleovorans cluster (98.4%) (MAIDAK et
Table 3. Main chemo-taxonomic and phenotypic properties of the 18 selected isolates in comparison with those of three Geobacillus
reference strain.

Refer- Strain G+C Cata- Oxi- Mini- Opti- Maxi- Growth Opti- Growth Opti-
ence name mol(%) lase dase mum mum mum range mum pH mum
Cluster* tempe- tempe- tempe- with salt salt range pH
rature rature rature (%) (%)

a A2 51.3 + + 37 65 70 0–3 2 5.5–9 8


a B3-1 51.4 – + 45 60 65 0–3 2 5.5–9 6
a B3s 51.9 + – 37 45 65 0–5 2 6–8 7
b B3 50.8 – + 37 60 65 0–10 2 5.5–9 7
b 3s-2 52.4 – + 37 65 65 0–3 2 7–9 8
c 7s 39 – – 37 55 65 2–3 2 7–9 7
d T3 40.8 – + 37 45 65 2–3 2 5.5–9 6
d 5-2 43.1 – + 45 60 70 0–5 2 6–8 8
d T2 51.0 + – 37 60 65 0–3 2 8–9 9
e 4-1 40.8 – + 37 55 65 2–3 2 7–9 8
e 1as 39 – + 37 55 65 2–3 2 6–9 7
f S3 51.2 + + 45 65 70 0–3 2 5.5–9 8
g A1 51.6 + + 37 45 60 2–3 2 5.5–9 7
g 5s 40 + – 37 65 70 0–3 2 6–8 7
DSM 465** 50.3 + + 45 55–65 70 0–5 0–2 5.5–8 6–8
h 10-1 42.7 – – 37 60 70 0–5 2 6–9 7
h 4-2 52.4 – – 37 55 65 0–3 2 5.5–9 8
h DSM 5366** 51–56 v v 35 55–70 78 0–2 0 6–8 6–7.5
h 3s-1 53 – + 37 60 72 0–3 2 5.5–9 6
i 1bw 45 – – 45 60 70 0–5 2 7–9 8
i DSM 22** 52.6 – – 45 60 75 0–3 0 6.5–8 7
Production of acetoin
Reference Cluster*

Citrate utilisation

Nitrate reduction
Acid from:***

Hydrolysis of:
Strain name

cellobiose

Tween 20
Tween 80
trehalose

mannitol
mannose

fructose
maltose
glucose
sucrose

esculin
gelatin
ribose

starch
casein

Species identification
a A2 G. thermodenitrificans
a B3-1 G. thermodenitrificans
a B3s G. thermodenitrificans
b B3 G. thermodenitrificans
b 3s-2 G. thermoleovorans
c 7s Bacillus sp.
d T3 Bacillus sp.
d 5-2 Geobacillus sp.
d T2 G. thermodenitrificans
e 4-1 Bacillus sp.
e 1as Bacillus sp.
f S3 G. thermodenitrificans
g A1 G. thermodenitrificans
g 5s B. pallidus
DSM 465** G. thermodenitrificans
h 10-1 Geobacillus sp.
h 4-2 G. thermoleovorans
h DSM5366** G. thermoleovorans
h 3s-1 Geobacillus sp.
i 1bw Geobacillus sp.
i DSM 22** G. stearothermophilus

Legend: * Clusters arising from numerical analysis of phenetic characters of isolates and reference strains. ** Type strain from
Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ). Data from literature. *** Data obtained by the API 50 CHB.
v – variable; w – weak.
582 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Table 3a

Antibiotic sensitivity

Growth pH range

Chloramphenicol
Reference cluster

Growth tempe-

Growth range

Nalidixic acid
Erythromycin
with salt (%)

Stteptomycin

Polymyxin B
Novobiocin

Kanamycin
Tetracyclin
rature (°C)

Bacitracin
Penicillin
Mobility

Catalase

Oxidase
Strain

a A2 – + + 37–70 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +


a B3-1 – – + 45–65 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
a B3s – + – 37–65 0–5 6–8 + + + + + + + – + +
b B3 – – + 37–65 0–10 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
b 3s-2 + – + 37–65 0–3 7–9 + + + + + + + – + +
c 7s – – – 37–65 2–3 7–9 + + + + + + + – + +
d T3 – – + 37–65 2–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
d 5-2 + – + 45–70 0–3 6–8 + + + + + + + + + +
d T2 – + – 37–65 0–3 8–9 + + + + + + + – + +
e 4-1 + – + 37–65 2–3 7–9 + + + + + + + – + +
e 1as – – + 37–65 2–3 6–9 + + + + + + + – + +
f S3 – + + 45–70 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
g A1 – + + 37–60 2–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – – –
g 5s + + – 37–70 0–3 6–8 + + + + + + + – + +
h 10-1 + – – 45–70 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
h 4-2 + – – 37–65 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
h 3s-1 + – + 37–72 0–3 5.5–9 + + + + + + + – + +
i 1bw + – – 45–70 2–3 7–9 + + + + + + + – + +
´
API 20E API 20NE
orto-nitro-phenyl-galactosidase

assimilation of phenylacetate
assimilation of arabinose

assimilation of gluconate
assimilation of N-acetyl-
assimilation of mannitol
assimilation of mannose
ornithine decarboxylase

assimilation of maltose
assimilation of glucose

assimilation of adipate
tryptophan deaminase

assimilation of malate

assimilation of citrate
arginine dehydrolase

lysine decarboxylase

acetoin production

gelatin hydrolysis
citrate utilisation
Reference cluster

indol production
H2S production

NO3 reduction

glucosammine
urease
Strain

a A2 – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – + – – – –
a B3-1 – – – – – – – – – – + + – – + – + + + + + – +
a B3s – – – – + – – – – – + + + – + – + – + – – – –
b B3 + – – – – – – – – – + + – – – – – – + – + – –
b 3s-2 – – – – + – – – – + + – + – + – – – – – – – –
c 7s – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – –
d T3 – – – – + – – – – – + + + – + + – + + + – – –
d 5-2 – – – – – – – – – + + – + – + + + + + + – – –
d T2 – – – – – – – – – + + + + – + + + + + + + – +
e 4-1 – – – – + – – – – + + – + – – + – + + + + + –
e 1as – – – – + – – – – + + + + – + – + + + – – – –
f S3 – – – – – – – – – – + – + + + + – + + – + – –
g A1 + – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + + + + – + – –
g 5s – – – – – – – – – + + – + – + + – + + + + – –
h 10-1 + – – – – – – – – – + + + – + + + + + – + – +
h 4-2 + – – – + – – – – + + – + + + + + + – – – – –
h 3s-1 – – – – – – – – – – + + + – + + + + + + + – +
i 1bw – – – – + – – – – + + – – – – – – – – – – – –
Table 3b

API 50 CHB-carbohydrate fermentation

20. α-methyl-D-mannoside

21. α-methyl-D-glucoside

22. N-acetyl-glucosamine
9. β-methyl-D-xyloside

25. Esculin hydrolysis


Reference cluster

3. D-arabinose
4. L-arabinose

13. D-mannose

23. Amygdalin
15. Rhamnose
12. D-fructose
10. Galactose

14. L-sorbose
2. erythritol

7. L- xylose

18. mannitol
6. D-xylose

8. Adonitol

16. Dulcitol
1. glycerol

24. Arbutin
19. sorbitol
17. Inositol
11. glucose
5. Ribose
Strain

a A2 – – – – + + – – – – + – + – – – – + – – – + – – +
a B3-1 – – – – + – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – +
a B3s – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
b B3 – – – – + – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – +
b 3s-2 – – – – + – – – + – – + – + – – – – – – – – – – +
c 7s – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
d T3 – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – + – + – +
d 5-2 – – – – – – – – – – + – + – – – – – – – – – – – –
d T2 – – – – + + – – – – + + – – – – – – – – – – – + +
e 4-1 + – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – +
e 1as – – – – + – – – – – – + – + – – – – – – – – – – +
f S3 – – – – + + – – – – + + + – – – – + – – – – – – +
g A1 – – – + – – – – – – + + + – – – – – – – + + + + +
g 5s + – – – – – – – – – + + + – – – + + + – + – + + +
h 10-1 + – – – + – – – – + + + + – – – – + – – – + – – +
h 4-2 – – – + + + – – – – + + + – – – – – – + + + + + +
h 3s-1 + – – – + + – – – + + + + – – – – + – – + – + + +
i 1bw + – – – + + – – – – + + + + – – – + – – – + – + +

Table 3c

API 50 CHB-carbohydrate fermentation

48. 2-ketogluconate
49. 5-ketogluconate
39. β-gentiobiose
Reference cluster

35. D-raffinose

40. D-turanose

42. D-tagatose
34. Melezitose
27. Cellobiose

45. D-arabitol

47. Gluconate
46. L-arabitol
30. Melibiose

32. Trehalose

37. Glycogen

41. D-lyxose

43. D-fucose

44. L-fucose
28. Maltose

29. Lactose

31. Sucrose

38. Xylitol
26. Salicin

36. Starch
33. Inulin
Strain

a A2 + + – – + – + – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – –
a B3-1 – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – + – – – – – – –
a B3s – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
b B3 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
b 3s-2 – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – + – – – – – – +
c 7s – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – + + – – – – – + +
d T3 – – + – – + + – – – + – – – – + + – – – – – + +
d 5-2 – – + – + + + – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
d T2 – – + – – – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – + –
e 4-1 – – – + – – + – – – + + – – – – + – – – – – – +
e 1as – – + – – + + – – – + – – – – – + – – – – – – +
f S3 – – + – – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – – – – –
g A1 + + – – – + + – – – – – – – – – + – – – – – – –
g 5s + + + – – + + – – – – – – – – – – – + + – – + –
h 10-1 – – + – + + + – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – + +
h 4-2 + + + + + + + – – + + – – + + – – – – – – – – +
h 3s-1 + + + + + + + – + + + + – + + – – – – – – + + +
i 1bw + + + – + + + – + + + + – – – – – – – – – + + +
584 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Table 3d

API ZYM Growth Hydrolysis of:


on:

18. N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase
2. phosphatase alcaline

6. leucine arylamidase

8. cystine arylamidase
4. esterase lipase (C8)

7. valine arylamidase

12. phosphohydrolase
11. phosphatase acid

15. β-glucuronidase
13. α-galactosidase
14. β-galactosidase

19. α-mannosidase
10. chymotrypsin

16. α-glucosidase
17. β-glucosidase
3. esterase (C4)

20. α-fucosidase
Reference cluster

5. lipase (C14)

9. trypsin

carragenan

tributyrin

Tween 20
Tween 80
dextran
glucose
sucrose

starch
casein
Strain

xylan
a A2 + + + + – – – – – + + + – – + – – – – – + + + + + + – – +
a B3-1 + + + + + – – – – – + + – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + + –
a B3s + + + – – – – – – + + + – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + + +
b B3 – + – – – – – – – + + – – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + – +
b 3s-2 – – – – – – – – – + + – – – – – – – – + + + + – + + – + –
c 7s + + + + + + + + + + + + – – – + – – – – – + – – + – – – –
d T3 + + + – – – – – – + + – – – + + – – – – + + + + – + – –
d 5-2 + + + – – – – – – + + + – – + – – – – + + + + + – – + – –
d T2 + + + + + – – – – + + + – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + +
e 4-1 – – – – – – – – – + + – – – + – – – – + + + + – + + + – –
e 1as – – – – – – – – – + + – – – + – – – – + + + + + + + + – –
f S3 + + + + – – – – – + + + – – + – – – – – + + + + + + + – +
g A1 + + + + – – – – – + + – – – – – – – – + + + – – – – – + –
g 5s + + + – – – – – – + – – – – – – – – – + + – + + + – – + –
h 10-1 + + + – – – – – – + + + + – + – – – – + + + + + + + + + +
h 4-2 + + + – – – – – – + + + + – + + – – – + + + + + + + + – –
h 3s-1 – – – – – – – – – + + – – – – – – – – + + + + + + + – + –
i 1bw + + + + + + – – – + + + – – – – – – – + + + + – + + – + –

al., 1999). This cluster also contained strains of subgroup species within the genus Bacillus, strains 4-1 and 1as
Ib, i.e., strains 4-2 and 3s-1 similar at 99.7–99.9% and should be considered two novel Bacillus species.
99.6–99.7%, respectively (Table 4). Strains 5-2, 10-1, The representative of subgroup Ia, strain A2, showed
1bw, members of group II, shared 98.6–99.1% similarity 98.9% DNA similarity with G. thermodenitrificans DSM
among each other and 98–98.6% between strain ICP 56 465T (Table 4) and must be considered a strain of this
and strain Ak1 to G. thermoglucosidasius (Table 4). The species. Similarly, strain 4-2 (subgroup Ib) was highly re-
sequence of the group III strain 5s was identical to that of lated to members of the G. thermoleovorans group
strain DSM 2349 and almost identical to that of B. pal- (79–89.6%), while reassociation values between DNAs
lidus (Table 4). Isolates in group IV (strain 4-1) and of strain 3s-1 and these organisms ranged between
group V (strain 1as) showed similarity values lower than 51.4–60.7%; reassociation of strain 3s-1 and strain 4-2
96% among themselves and to any described species of was 62.6% (Table 4). The G. thermoleovorans group in-
Geobacillus and Bacillus. cludes G. kaustophilus, G. thermocatenulatus, “B. caldo-
lyticus”, “B. caldotenax”, “B. caldovelox” and G. ther-
moleovorans that share DNA/DNA similarity values
DNA/DNA hybridisation
>70% and should be considered as one species (SUNNA et
The degree of DNA-DNA similarity as measured by al., 1997). The three isolates of group II (strains 5-2, 10-1,
the DNA/DNA reassociation method was determined for 1bw) exhibited 48.5–60% DNA/DNA similarity one to
seven of the nine isolates that showed high 16S rDNA each other (Table 4), while the representative of group III,
similarity values with type strains of Geobacillus species strain 5s, should be considered a strain of B. pallidus
(Table 4). Strains 4-1 and 1as were not hybridised against (100%) (Table 4). Since the DNA/DNA hybridisation ex-
any reference strain because of the isolated phylogenetic periments yielded less than 70% similarity with the phy-
position, remote from any Bacillus reference strain (lower logenetically closest Geobacillus species (Table 4), strains
than 96%) (STACKEBRANDT and GOEBEL, 1994). Accord- 3s-1, 5-2, 10-1 and 1bw are considered to represent new
ing to their phylogenetic distance from all reference species (WAYNE et al., 1987). One of these, strain 3s-1,
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 585
Table 4. 16S rDNA similarity values (%) and DNA-DNA reassociation levels (%) for seven isolates and the closest reference strains within three (I, II, III) of the five groups of

*Range of 16S rDNA and DNA/DNA similarity values obtained after comparison of our isolates with G. thermoleovorans, G. kaustophilus, “B. caldolyticus”, “B. caldotenax”,
has recently been described as B. vulcani (CACCAMO et

100
13

al., 2000). This species has not yet been reclassified as a


member of Geobacillus (NAZINA et al., 2001) because the

99.3
100
publication of this species occurred during the printing
12
Group III


process of the latter genus.

99.7
99.5

and “B. caldovelox”, considered as representative of the same species, G. thermoleovorans, on the basis of DNA/DNA reassociation >70% (SUNNA et al., 1997).
11


Conclusions

94.7
94.6
94.7
59.8
48.5 Comparison of the isolates from shallow hydrothermal
10

– vents of Eolian Islands with reference strains of Bacillus


strains recognised into the phylogenetic tree (upper right triangle: DNA/DNA reassociation values; lower left triangle: 16S rDNA similarity values).

94.7
94.6
94.7
98.6
and Geobacillus by numerical analysis methods did not
60

allow their unambiguous identification at the species


9


Group II

level. The majority of strains (83%) grouped together


94.7
94.8
99.1
98.6

forming several clusters within Group A, related to G.


95
8

thermodenitrificans. Taxonomically, the clear separation


between G. thermodenitrificans (Group A) and the other
94.5–94.6
51.4–60.7

96.6–96.8
96.3–96.4
96.9–97.1

reference strains (Group B) agrees with previously pub-


79–89.6

lished data on thermophilic bacilli (WHITE et al., 1993;


72–73

94.4
40.4
61.4

94.4

MARTEINSSON et al., 1996; MANACHINI et al., 2000).


7

Comparison of metabolic properties of seven strains se-


lected from Group A, namely strains A1, A2, B3, B3-1,


99.7–99.0

B3s, S3, and T2, revealed that they resembled G. ther-


modenitrificans, but were phenetically heterogeneous in
94.4
62.6

94.5
94.4
96.6
96.3
96.9

many respects, such as hydrolysis of casein and gelatin,


6

and acid production from sucrose, trehalose, cellobiose,


mannitol, dulcitol, erythritol. Only after the examination
99.6–99.7

of DNA-DNA similarity and 16S rDNA gene sequence


similarity of representatives from each cluster, we were
41.2

99.6

94.4
96.8
99.6

94.6
94.4
97.1

able to determine the SSM level at which individual ge-


5

nomic species were separated one from each other pheno-


typically. Comparison of our data with the most recent
99.1–99.2

literature confirms the high phenotypic intraspecific di-


versity of thermophilic bacilli, as demonstrated by the
99.1

94.6
99.1

94.7
94.6
96.8
96.4
97.1

formation at 68% similarity level of a cluster with six dif-


4

ferent strains (G. thermoleovorans, G. kaustophilus, G.


Subgroup Ib

98.9–99.1

thermocatenulatus, “B. caldolyticus”, “B. caldotenax”,


“B. caldovelox”) representative of the same species G.
98.9
98.9
98.9

94.6
96.4
96.1
96.7

94.7
94.6

thermoleovorans, phenetically heterogeneous and geneti-


48
3

cally homogeneous. Phylogenetic analyses of partial 16S


rDNA sequences and DNA/DNA reassociation of one


98.2–98.3

representative of these seven isolates, strain A2, indicated


that all of them should be considered strains of G. ther-
98.9

98.3
98.4
98.4
98.2

93.9
95.7
96.3
96.7

94.1

modenitrificans, which dominated among the ther-


Subgroup Ia

94
2

mophilic bacilli isolated from Porto di Levante, at Vul-


cano Island. Also the metabolic properties of G. ther-
99.7
98.4
98.6
98.5
98.4
98.4
95.9
95.5
97.1

94.3
94.1

modenitrificans are thus much broader than those indi-


94
1

cated in the description of the species, containing pre-


dominantly isolates from soil (MANACHINI et al., 2000).
G. thermodenitrificans is more halotolerant than other
“B. thermoalkalophilus”

described thermophilic Geobacillus and Bacillus species


Geobacillus strain 10-1
Geobacillus strain 1bw
Geobacillus strain 3s-1
G. thermodenitrificans
G. stearothermophilus
Geobacillus strain A-2

Geobacillus strain 4-2

Geobacillus strain 5-2

(SHARP et al., 1992) and it is therefore not surprising that


G. thermocatenulatus

G. thermoleovorans*

Geobacillus strain 5s

the high salinity of thermal vents at Porto di Levante


favours the presence of strains of this species.
The polyphasic characterization allowed the recogni-
B. pallidus

tion of two new Bacillus and four new Geobacillus


species, one of which, strain 3s-1, has recently been de-
scribed as B. vulcani (CACCAMO et al., 2000). Strain 4-1
Strains

and strain T3 (related to B. methanolicus), as well as


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

strains 7s and 1as (related to B. pallidus) represent new


586 T. L. MAUGERI et al.

Bacillus species, while strains 1bw, 10-1 and 5-2 (all re- GUGLIANDOLO, C., ITALIANO, F., MAUGERI, T.L., INGUAGGIATO, S.,
lated to G. thermoglucosidasius) represent novel CACCAMO, D. AMEND, J.: Submarine hydrothermal vents of
Geobacillus species. The description of these species is in the Aeolian Islands: relationship between microbial commu-
preparation (MAUGERI et al., unpublished). nities and thermal fluids. Geomicrobiol. J. 16, 105–118
(1999).
Many of these new isolates exhibited characteristics
HARWOOD, C. R.: Bacillus, vol. 2. In: Biotechnology Hand-
potentially useful for biotechnological exploitation. All of books. London, Plenum Press 1989.
them were heavy-metals resistant (MAUGERI et al., 1999) HJÖRLEIFSDÓTTIR, S., KRISTJÁNSSON, J. K., ALFREDSSON, G. A.:
and able to utilize hydrocarbons (GUGLIANDOLO et al., Thermophilic organisms in submarine freshwater hot springs
1998); strains 4-1, 3s-1, 5-2, T3, 1bw and 10-1 produced in Iceland, pp. 109–112. In: Microbiology of extreme envi-
exopolysaccharides. ronments and its potential for biotechnology (M. S. DA
The results lead to the conclusion that marine hydro- COSTA, J. C. DUARTE, R.A.D. WILLIAMS, eds.), London, Elsevi-
thermal vents of Eolian Islands harbour different thermo- er 1989.
philic organisms the taxonomic novelty and biotechno- HUSS, V. A. R., FESTL, H., SCHLEIFER, K. H.: Studies on the spec-
trophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from re-
logical potential are worth pursuing.
naturation rates. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 4, 184–192 (1983).
JAHNKE, K. D.: BASIC computer program for evaluation of spec-
troscopic DNA renaturation data from GILFORD SYSTEM 2600
Acknowledgements spectrophotometer on a PC/XT/AT type personal computer. J.
We wish thank Dr. Franco Italiano from IGF (CNR), Palermo Microbiol. Methods 15, 61–73 (1992).
(Italy), chief scientist of the cruise (1996) aboard the M/V Ura- JUKES, T. H., CANTOR, C. R.: Evolution of protein molecules, pp.
nia, for inviting us to participate in the expedition. 21–132. In: Mammalian Protein Metabolism (N. H. Murano,
This study was partly funded by the European Commission ed.), New York, Academic Press 1969.
project MAS3-CT 95-0034, which was coordinated by Prof. LOGAN, N. A., BERKELEY, R. C. W.: Identification of Bacillus
Daniel Prieur, University of Brest, France. strains using the API system. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130,
1871–1882 (1984).
MAIDAK, B. L., COLE, J. R., PARKER, C. T. JR., GARRITY, G. M.,
References LARSEN, N., LI, B., LILBURN, T. G., MCCAUGHEY, M. J.,
OLSEN, G. J., OVERBEEK, R., PRAMANIK, S., SCHMIDT, T. M.,
AHMAD, S., SCOPES, R. K., REES, G. N., PATEL, B. K. C.: Saccha- TIEDJE, J. M., WOESE, C. R.: A new version of the RDP (Ribo-
rococcus caldoxylosilyticus sp. nov., an obligately ther- somal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 171–173
mophilic, xylose-utilizing, endospore-forming bacterium. Int. (1999).
J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50 (2), 517–523 (2000). MANACHINI, P. L., MORA, D., NICASTRO, G., PARINI, C., STACKE-
ASH, C., FARROW, J. A. E., WALLBANKS, S., COLLINS, M. D.: Phy- BRANDT, E., PUKALL, R., FORTINA, M. G.: Bacillus thermodeni-
logenetic heterogeneity of the genus Bacillus revealed by com- trificans sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50,
parative analysis of small-subunit-ribosomal RNA. Lett. 1331–1337 (2000).
Appl. Microbiol. 13, 202–206 (1991). MARTEINSSON, V. T., BIRRIEN, J. L., JEANTHON, C., PRIEUR, D.:
AUSTIN, B., PRIEST, F.: Modern Bacterial Taxonomy (R. Van Nos- Numerical taxonomic study of thermophilic Bacillus isolated
trand, ed.), Wokingham, Berkshire 1986. from three geographically separated deep-sea hydrothermal
CACCAMO, D., GUGLIANDOLO, C., STACKEBRANDT, E., MAUGERI, vents. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 21, 255–266 (1996).
T. L.: Bacillus vulcani sp. nov., a novel thermophilic species MAUGERI , T. L., CACCAMO, D., GUGLIANDOLO, C.: Isolamento di
isolated from a shallow marine hydrothermal vent. Int. J. plasmidi da bacilli termofili. Atti del I Convegno Federazione
Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 50, 2009–2012 (2000). Italiana Scienze della Vita 2–6 Ottobre 1999 Riva del Garda
CASHION, P., HOLDER-FRANKLIN, M. A., MCCULLY, J., FRANKLIN, Trento. Abstract book 243 (1999).
M. A.: Rapid method for the base ratio determination of bac- MESBAH, M., PREMACHANDRAN, U., WHITMAN, W. B.: Precise
terial DNA. Anal. Biochem. 81, 461–466 (1977). measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by
DEGRYSE, E., GLANSDORFF, N., PIÈRARD, A. A.: Comparative high-performance liquid chromatography. Int. J. Syst. Bacte-
analysis of extreme thermophilic bacteria belonging to the riol. 39, 159–167 (1989).
genus Thermus. Arch. Microbiol. 117, 189–196 (1978). MIQUEL, P. (1888) Cited by Sharp et al., 1992.
DE LEY, J., CATTOIR, H., REYNAERTS, A.: The quantitative mea- NAZINA, T. N., TOUROVA, T. P., POLTARAUS, A. B., NOVIKOVA, E.
surement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur. V., GRIGORYAN, A. A., IVANOVA, A. E., LYSENKO, A. M.,
J. Biochem. 12, 133–142 (1970). PETRUNYAKA, V. V., OSIPOV, G. A., BELYAEV, S. S., IVANOV, M.
DE SOETE, G.: A least squares algorithm for fitting additive trees V.: Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descrip-
to proximity data. Psychometrika 48, 621–626 (1983). tions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and
FELSENSTEIN, J.: PHYLIP (phylogenetic inference package) version Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and
3.51c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermo-
Seattle 1993. catenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus,
FELSENSTEIN, J.: Phylogenies from molecular sequences: infer- Bacillus thermoglucosidasius and Bacillus thermodenitrifi-
ence and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22, 521–565 (1988). cans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearother-
GORDON, R. E., SMITH, N. R.: Aerobic spore forming bacteria mophilus, G. thermocatenulatus, G. thermoleovorans, G.
capable of growth at high temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 58, kaustophilus, G. thermoglucosidasius and G. thermodenitrif-
327–341 (1949). icans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 433– 446 (2001).
GUGLIANDOLO, C., MAUGERI, T.L., COSTA, F., CACCAMO D.: Iso- NICOLAUS, B., LAMA, L., ESPOSITO, E., MANCA, M. C., DI PRISCO,
lation and characterization of thermotolerant hydrocarbon- G., GAMBACORTA, A.: “Bacillus thermoantarcticus” sp. nov.,
utilizing bacteria from marine, shallow hydrothermal vents. from Mount Melbourne, Antarctica: a novel thermophilic
Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Médit., 35, 348–349 (1998). species. Polar Biol. 16, 101–104 (1996).
Biodiversity of thermophilic bacilli from Eolian Islands 587

RAINEY, F. A., FRITZE, D., STACKEBRANDT, E.: The phylogenetic species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44,
diversity of thermophilic members of the genus Bacillus as re- 846–849 (1994).
vealed by 16S rDNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 115, SUNNA, A., TOKAJIAN, S., BURGHARDT, J., RAINEY, F.,
205–212 (1994). ANTRANIKIAN, G., HASHWA, F.: Identification of Bacillus
RAINEY, F. A., WARD-RAINEY, N., KROPPENSTEDT, R. M., STACKE- kaustophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus and Bacillus strain
BRANDT, E.: The genus Nocardiopsis represents a phylogeneti- HSR as members of Bacillus thermoleovorans. Syst. Appl.
cally coherent taxon and a distinct actinomycete lineage: pro- Microbiol. 20, 232–237 (1997).
posal of Nocardiopsaceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, WAYNE, L. G., BRENNER, D. J., COLWELL, R. R., GRIMONT, P. A.
1088–1092 (1996). D., KANDLER, O., KRICHEVSKY, M. I., MOORE, W. E. C., MUR-
SHARP, R. J., BOWN, K. J., ATKINSON, A.: Phenotypic and geno- RAY, R. G. E., STACKEBRANDT, E., STARR, M. P., TRÜPER, H. G.:
typic characterization of some thermophilic species of Bacil- Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on reconciliation of ap-
lus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 117, 201–210 (1980). proaches on bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37,
SHARP, R. J., RILEY, P. W., WHITE, D.: Heterotrophic ther- 463–464 (1987).
mophilic bacilli, pp. 19–50. In: Thermophilic bacteria (J. K. WHITE, D., SHARP, R. J., PRIEST, F. G.: A polyphasic taxonomic
KRISTJÁNSSON, ed.), Boca Raton, CRC Press 1992. study of thermophilic bacilli from a wide geographical area.
SMIBERT, R. M., KRIEG, N. R.: Phenotypic characterization, pp. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 64, 357–386 (1993).
607–654. In: Methods for general and molecular bacteriology
(P. GERHARDT, R. G. E. MURRAY, W. A. WOOD, N. R. KRIEG,
eds.), Washington, American Society for Microbiology 1994.
SNEATH, P. H. A., JOHNSON, R.: The influence on numerical tax-
onomic similarities of errors on microbiological tests. J. Gen.
Microbiol. 72, 377–392 (1972). Corresponding author:
SNEATH, P. H. A., SOKAL, R. R.: The principles and practice of TERESA L. MAUGERI, Dipartimento di Biologia Animale ed Ecolo-
numerical classification, pp. 223–234. In: Numerical taxono- gia Marina, Sez. Ecologia Microbica e Biotecnologie, Salita
my (W. H. FREEMAN, ed.), San Francisco 1973. Sperone, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
STACKEBRANDT, E., GOEBEL, B. M.: A place for DNA/DNA reas- Tel.: ++39-90-676 5523; Fax: ++39-90-393409;
sociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present e-mail: tmaugeri@unime.it

Anda mungkin juga menyukai