Anda di halaman 1dari 36

Hypervascular Hepatic Lesions: Spectrum of Clinico-

Radiological Features and Differential Diagnosis

Poster No.: C-0874


Congress: ECR 2013
Type: Educational Exhibit
Authors: R. Taiji, N. Marugami, J. Takahama, A. Marugami, T. Akashi, T.
Taoka, K. Kichikawa; Kashihara/JP
Keywords: Neoplasia, Education, Ultrasound, MR, CT, Liver, Abdomen
DOI: 10.1594/ecr2013/C-0874

Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material
submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References
to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to third-
party sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in
any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the
third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of
these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy
of material in this file.
As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as
well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically
based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited.
You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all
claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related
to your use of these pages.
Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not
available in the pdf version of presentations.
www.myESR.org

Page 1 of 36
Learning objectives

1. To review the current imaging techniques of contrast enhanced-US/CT/MRI


and mechanisms of liver specific contrast agents
2. To illustrate the spectrum of clinic-radiological features of hypervascular
hepatic lesions
3. To discuss the clinico-radiological key findings in differential diagnosis

Background

Hypervasular hepatic lesions include both benign and malignant etiologies. In spite
of development of multimodality imaging or liver specific contrast agents, the
characterization of hepatic lesions often presents a diagnostic challenge to diagnostic
radiologists.

Imaging findings OR Procedure details

1 Multimodality Imaging

Current multimodality techniques of contrast enhanced-imagings using US, CT and MRI.


Mechanism of action of liver specific contrast agents ( Sonazoid, Gd-EOB-DTPA and
SPIO ) compared with extracellular contrast agent.

• Contrast enhanced Ultrasound (US)

Contrast media: Sonazoid

Page 2 of 36
Fig. 1: Ultrasound contrast media; Sonazoid
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 3 of 36
Fig. 2: Sonazoid-enhanced US
References: - Kashihara/JP

• Contrast enhanced CT (DCE-CT)

Contrast media: Iodine

• Dynamic contrast enhance MR (DCE-MRI)

Contrast media: Gadolinium (Gd), SPIO, Gd-EOB DTPA (EOB)

Page 4 of 36
Fig. 3: Gd-DTPA vs. SPIO vs. Gd-EOB-DTPA
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 5 of 36
Fig. 4: Distribution of contrast media
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 6 of 36
Fig. 5
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 7 of 36
Fig. 6: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 8 of 36
Fig. 7: EOB-enhanced MR imaging
References: - Kashihara/JP

2, Hypervascular hepatic lesions

Common

• Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Hemangioma, Focal nodular hyperplasia


(FNH), hepatic adenoma, hepatic metastasis, pseudo lesion (A-P shunt)

Uncommon

• Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML), Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma


(ICC), dysplastic nodule, Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT), Pseudolymphoma

3, Case presentations

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Page 9 of 36
• Clinical Features
• • Cirrhotic liver (Alcoholism, Viral infection, NASH)
• Increased tumor marker (AFP, PIVKA-II)
• Radiological clues
• • Mosaic pattern
• Hyper- on arterial phase and hypo- on late phase (washout)
• Capsule rim
• EOB uptake (2.5-8.5%)

Fig. 8: Hepatocellular carcinoma


References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 10 of 36
Fig. 9: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Sonazoid-enhanced US
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 11 of 36
Fig. 10: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 12 of 36
Fig. 11: Hepatocellular carcinoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 13 of 36
Fig. 12: Hepatocellular carcinoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Hepatic cavernous hemangioma

• Clinical features
• • Normal liver
• Radiological clues
• • Wax and wane sign (chameleon sign)
• Centripetal filling , Flash filling
• Isodence (isointense) to blood vessels
• Hiperintense on T2WI similar to CSF
• Positive enahncement on SPIO-T1WI

Page 14 of 36
Fig. 13: Hepatic hemangioma: US
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 15 of 36
Fig. 14: Hepatic hemangigoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 16 of 36
Fig. 15: Hepatic hemangioma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 17 of 36
Fig. 16: Hepatic hemangioma: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

• Clinical Features
• • Normal liver
• rd th
3 -4 decades
• Radiological clues
• • Central scar
• Homogenous enhancement at arterial phase
• lack of corona enhancement
• SPIO. EOB uptake
• Draining to hepatic vein

Page 18 of 36
Fig. 17: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 19 of 36
Fig. 18: Focal nodular hyperplasia: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 20 of 36
Fig. 19: Focal nodular hyperplasia: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 21 of 36
Fig. 20: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 22 of 36
Fig. 21: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Angiography
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 23 of 36
Fig. 22: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Single lebel CT hepatic angiography
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 24 of 36
Fig. 23: Focal nodular hyperplasia: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Hepatic metastases

• Clinical features

Past history of malignancy

Elevated tumor marker

• Radiological clues

Difficulty in differentiation between mets and HCC

• Hyper vascular metastases from

Renal cell carcinoma

Page 25 of 36
Breast cancer

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Thyroid cancer

Malignant melanoma

Sarcoma

Carcinoid

Gastric cancer et al

Fig. 24: Hepatic metastases from RCC: Dynamic CT


References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 26 of 36
Fig. 25: Hepatic metastases from PNET: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 27 of 36
Fig. 26: Hepatic metastases from gastric cancer: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Hepatic pseudolesion

• Hypervascular peudolesion

A-P shunt

Third flow

Gall bladder vein

Aberrant right gastric vein

Aberrant left gastric vein

Para umbilical vein / sappey's vein

Inflammation

Page 28 of 36
Portal vein occlusion

Liver cirrhosisCompression from rib bone

• Clinical features

Asymptomatic

• Radiological clues

Isodence / isointense

Wedge shape enhancement

Specific lesions

EOB/SPIO uptake

Fig. 27: A-P shunt: EOB-MRI

Page 29 of 36
References: - Kashihara/JP

Cholangiocellular carcinoma

• Clinical features

Abdominal pain

Elevated tumor marker#CEA, CA19-9#

• Radiological clues

Lobulated margin

Substantial delayed enhancement at CT/ Gd-MRI

(mimicking metastases)

Bile duct dilatation

Early wash out at SPIO-MRI / Sonazoid-US

Page 30 of 36
Fig. 28: Cholangiocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML)

• Clinical features

Asymptomatic

• Radiological clues

Fat tissue

Homogenous enhancement (minimal fat)

Draining to hepatic vein

Page 31 of 36
Fig. 29: Hepatic angiomyolipoma; EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 32 of 36
Fig. 30: Hepatic angiomyolipoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Miscellaneous

Page 33 of 36
Fig. 31: Inflammatory pseudotumor: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP

Page 34 of 36
Fig. 32: Pseudolymphoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP

Conclusion

Radiologists should be familiar with current multimodality and liver specific contrast agent.
Some clinico-radiological key findings may allow diagnostic radiologists to lead to correct
diagnosis.

References

• Michael P. Federle, et al: Diagnostic imaging Abdomen

Page 35 of 36
• Chung YE, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma variants: radiologic-pathologic
correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):W7-13.
• Jeong YY, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver with helical
CT and MRI: imaging spectrum and pitfalls of cirrhosis-related nodules. AJR
Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):1024-32.
• Kudo M: Diagnostic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress.
Oncology. 2011;81 Suppl 1:73-85. doi: 10.1159/000333265. Epub 2011 Dec
22.
• Chanyaputhipong J, et al: Gadoxetate Acid-Enhanced MR Imaging for HCC:
A Review for Clinicians. Int J Hepatol. 2011
• Arita J, et al: Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound
using Sonazoid in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011
Dec;254(6):992-9
• Lee JM, et al: Characterization of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic
iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: value of distributional phase T1-weighted
imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):9-18.
• Fowler KJ, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions:
approach to imaging diagnosis. Hepatology. 2011 Dec;54(6):2227-37.
• Silva AC, et al: MR imaging of hypervascular liver masses: a review of
current techniques. Radiographics. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):385-402.
• Kamura T, et al: Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma versus
hypervascular pseudolesions: differential diagnosis on MRI. Abdom Imaging.
2002 May-Jun;27(3):315-24.
• Yoshimitsu K, et al: Unusual hemodynamics and pseudolesions of the
noncirrhotic liver at CT. Radiographics. 2001 Oct;21 Spec No:S81-96.
• Cai PQ, et al: Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with
clinical-pathologic comparison. Abdom Imaging. 2012 Sep 21.
• Högemann D, et al: Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology
in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(8):1389-95.

Personal Information

Page 36 of 36

Anda mungkin juga menyukai