Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material
submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References
to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to third-
party sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in
any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the
third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of
these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy
of material in this file.
As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as
well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically
based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited.
You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all
claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related
to your use of these pages.
Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not
available in the pdf version of presentations.
www.myESR.org
Page 1 of 36
Learning objectives
Background
Hypervasular hepatic lesions include both benign and malignant etiologies. In spite
of development of multimodality imaging or liver specific contrast agents, the
characterization of hepatic lesions often presents a diagnostic challenge to diagnostic
radiologists.
1 Multimodality Imaging
Page 2 of 36
Fig. 1: Ultrasound contrast media; Sonazoid
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 3 of 36
Fig. 2: Sonazoid-enhanced US
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 4 of 36
Fig. 3: Gd-DTPA vs. SPIO vs. Gd-EOB-DTPA
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 5 of 36
Fig. 4: Distribution of contrast media
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 6 of 36
Fig. 5
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 7 of 36
Fig. 6: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 8 of 36
Fig. 7: EOB-enhanced MR imaging
References: - Kashihara/JP
Common
Uncommon
3, Case presentations
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Page 9 of 36
• Clinical Features
• • Cirrhotic liver (Alcoholism, Viral infection, NASH)
• Increased tumor marker (AFP, PIVKA-II)
• Radiological clues
• • Mosaic pattern
• Hyper- on arterial phase and hypo- on late phase (washout)
• Capsule rim
• EOB uptake (2.5-8.5%)
Page 10 of 36
Fig. 9: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Sonazoid-enhanced US
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 11 of 36
Fig. 10: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 12 of 36
Fig. 11: Hepatocellular carcinoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 13 of 36
Fig. 12: Hepatocellular carcinoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
• Clinical features
• • Normal liver
• Radiological clues
• • Wax and wane sign (chameleon sign)
• Centripetal filling , Flash filling
• Isodence (isointense) to blood vessels
• Hiperintense on T2WI similar to CSF
• Positive enahncement on SPIO-T1WI
Page 14 of 36
Fig. 13: Hepatic hemangioma: US
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 15 of 36
Fig. 14: Hepatic hemangigoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 16 of 36
Fig. 15: Hepatic hemangioma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 17 of 36
Fig. 16: Hepatic hemangioma: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
• Clinical Features
• • Normal liver
• rd th
3 -4 decades
• Radiological clues
• • Central scar
• Homogenous enhancement at arterial phase
• lack of corona enhancement
• SPIO. EOB uptake
• Draining to hepatic vein
Page 18 of 36
Fig. 17: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 19 of 36
Fig. 18: Focal nodular hyperplasia: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 20 of 36
Fig. 19: Focal nodular hyperplasia: SPIO-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 21 of 36
Fig. 20: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 22 of 36
Fig. 21: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Angiography
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 23 of 36
Fig. 22: Focal nodular hyperplasia: Single lebel CT hepatic angiography
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 24 of 36
Fig. 23: Focal nodular hyperplasia: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Hepatic metastases
• Clinical features
• Radiological clues
Page 25 of 36
Breast cancer
Thyroid cancer
Malignant melanoma
Sarcoma
Carcinoid
Gastric cancer et al
Page 26 of 36
Fig. 25: Hepatic metastases from PNET: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 27 of 36
Fig. 26: Hepatic metastases from gastric cancer: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Hepatic pseudolesion
• Hypervascular peudolesion
A-P shunt
Third flow
Inflammation
Page 28 of 36
Portal vein occlusion
• Clinical features
Asymptomatic
• Radiological clues
Isodence / isointense
Specific lesions
EOB/SPIO uptake
Page 29 of 36
References: - Kashihara/JP
Cholangiocellular carcinoma
• Clinical features
Abdominal pain
• Radiological clues
Lobulated margin
(mimicking metastases)
Page 30 of 36
Fig. 28: Cholangiocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
• Clinical features
Asymptomatic
• Radiological clues
Fat tissue
Page 31 of 36
Fig. 29: Hepatic angiomyolipoma; EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 32 of 36
Fig. 30: Hepatic angiomyolipoma: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Miscellaneous
Page 33 of 36
Fig. 31: Inflammatory pseudotumor: Dynamic CT
References: - Kashihara/JP
Page 34 of 36
Fig. 32: Pseudolymphoma: EOB-MRI
References: - Kashihara/JP
Conclusion
Radiologists should be familiar with current multimodality and liver specific contrast agent.
Some clinico-radiological key findings may allow diagnostic radiologists to lead to correct
diagnosis.
References
Page 35 of 36
• Chung YE, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma variants: radiologic-pathologic
correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):W7-13.
• Jeong YY, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver with helical
CT and MRI: imaging spectrum and pitfalls of cirrhosis-related nodules. AJR
Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):1024-32.
• Kudo M: Diagnostic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress.
Oncology. 2011;81 Suppl 1:73-85. doi: 10.1159/000333265. Epub 2011 Dec
22.
• Chanyaputhipong J, et al: Gadoxetate Acid-Enhanced MR Imaging for HCC:
A Review for Clinicians. Int J Hepatol. 2011
• Arita J, et al: Usefulness of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound
using Sonazoid in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011
Dec;254(6):992-9
• Lee JM, et al: Characterization of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic
iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: value of distributional phase T1-weighted
imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):9-18.
• Fowler KJ, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions:
approach to imaging diagnosis. Hepatology. 2011 Dec;54(6):2227-37.
• Silva AC, et al: MR imaging of hypervascular liver masses: a review of
current techniques. Radiographics. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):385-402.
• Kamura T, et al: Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma versus
hypervascular pseudolesions: differential diagnosis on MRI. Abdom Imaging.
2002 May-Jun;27(3):315-24.
• Yoshimitsu K, et al: Unusual hemodynamics and pseudolesions of the
noncirrhotic liver at CT. Radiographics. 2001 Oct;21 Spec No:S81-96.
• Cai PQ, et al: Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with
clinical-pathologic comparison. Abdom Imaging. 2012 Sep 21.
• Högemann D, et al: Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology
in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(8):1389-95.
Personal Information
Page 36 of 36