48

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Ibrahimagic L et al. Relation between the face and the tooth form.
CollAntropol. 2001; 619-26 (24).
2. Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch
dimensions and vertical facial morphology in class I subjects. The Journal of
Indian Orthodontic Society. 2012; 316-324 (46).
3. Anwar N, Fida M. Variability of arch forms in various vertical facial patterns.
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeon Pakistan. 2010; 565-570
(20).
4. Franco FCM, Araujo TM, Vogel CJ, Quintao CCA. Brachycephalic,
dolichocephalic, and mesocephalic: Is it appropriate to describe the face using
skull pattern. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 159-63 (18).
5. Al-Zubair NM. Establishment of Yemeni dental arch form. Orthodontic
Journal of Nepal. 2013; 22-26 (3).
6. Budiardjo SB. Perubahandankarakteristik lengkung gigi selama periode
tumbuh kembang serta faktor yang memperngaruhi. Jurnal Ilmiahdan
Teknologi Kedokteran Gigi. 2003; 73-77 (1).
7. Olmez S, Dogan S. Comparison of the arch forms and dimensions in various
malocclusions of the Turkish population. Journal of Stomatology. 2011; 158-
164 (1).
8. Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental arch width and
vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. European Journal of
Orthodontics. 2008; 288-294 (30).
9. Dmitrienko SV. Domenyuk DA, Kochkonyan AS, Karslieva AG, Dmitrienko
DS. Modern classification of dental arches. 2014; 14-16 (4).
10. Ahmed HMA, Ali FA. Dental arches dimensions, forms and the relation to
facial types in a sample of Iraqi adults with skeletal and dental class I normal
occlusion. J Bagh College Dentistry. 2012; 99-107 (24).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

 49

11. Paranhos LR, Lima CS, Silva RHA, Daruge Junior E, Torres FC. Correlation
between maxillary central incisor crown morphology and mandibulardental
arch form in normal occlusion subjects. Braz Dent J. 2012; 149-153 (2).
12. Singh G. Textbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007: 67-8.
13. Riahdo J. 2011. Pengaruhretraksi anterior
terhadapbibirataspadaperawatanortodontidenganpencabutan premolar
pertamaatas. Tesis. Medan: FakultasKedokteran Gigi, Universitas Sumatera
Utara.
14. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. W.B. Saunders Company.
Philadelphia, 1996: 129-45.
15. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontic. Philaddelphia: W.B. Saunders
Company, 2001: 66-71.
16. Martins LF, Vigorito JW. Photometric analysis applied in determining facial
type. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2012; 71-5 (17).
17. Samawi S. A Short guide to clinical digital photography in orthodontics.
Jordan: Sdoc, 2008: 5-18.
18. Shafique A. Saleem T, Chattha MR. Arch form analyses: A comparison of
two different methods. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2001; 347-51 (31).
19. Jacobson A. Radiographic cephalometry from basics to videoimaging.
Alabama: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1995: 281-7.
20. Louly F, Nouer PRA, Janson G, Pinzan A. Dental arch dimensions in the
mixed dentition: a study of Brazilian children from 9 to 12 years of age. J
Appl Oral Sci. 2011: 169-74 (19).
21. Riberio JS, Ambrosio AR, Pinto AS, Shimizu IS, Shimizu RH. Evaluation of
transverse changes in the dental arches according to growth pattern: a
longitudinal study. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2012: 66-73 (17).
22. Paranhos LR et al. Dental arch morphology in normal occlusions. Braz J Oral
Sci. 2011: 65-68 (10).
23. Braun S, Hnat WP, Fender DE, Lefan HL. The form of human dental arch.
The Angle Orthodontist. 1998: 29-36 (68).

Universitas Sumatera Utara

 50

24. McLaughin, Bennelt JC. Arch form considerations for stability and esthetics.
Rev EspOrtod. 1999: 46-63 (29).
25. Muhamad AH, Nezar W, Azaaldeen A. The curve of dental arch in normal
occlusion. Open Science Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015: 47-54 (3).
26. Otham SA et al. Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and
Malaysian Aborogines in Penisular Malaysia. Korean Association of
Orthodontics. 2012; 47-54 (42).
27. Shrestha RM.Polynomial analysis of dental arch form of Nepalese adult
subjects. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2013; 7-13 (3).
28. Heidari Z, Sagheb HRM, Mugahi MHN. Morphological evaluation of head
and face in 18-25 years old women in Southeast of Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2006:
400-404 (3).
29. Ogah SA, Olege FE, Dunmade AD, Lawal IA. Facial Index as seen at the
University of Horin Teaching Hospital (UITH). Asian Journal of
Multidisiplinary Studies. 2014: 20-22 (2).
30. Kanan U, Gandotra A, Desai A, Andani R. Variation in Facial Index of
Gujarati Males. International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2012:
27-31 (1).
31. Saleem T, Shafique A. Mandibular arch form analyses: a comparison
beteween results of two different methods. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal.
2012: 556-560 (32).
32. Mohammad A, Koralakunte PR. Gender identification and morphologic
classification of tooth, arch and palatal forms in Saudi population. J Pharm
Bioallied Sci. 2015: 486-490 (7).
33. Khatri JM, Madaan JB. Evaluation of arch form among patients seeking
orthodontic treatments. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2012: 325-
328 (4).
34. Paranhos RL et al. Is there any association between facial type and
mandibular dental arch form in subjects with normal occlusion.
ActaScientiarum. 2014: 129-134 (36).

Universitas Sumatera Utara