fae eis
discrete,
3
Governing (Through)
n-Governmental Actors:
The Global Human Rights
Architecture and the
International NGO
sean Wie cod cig
a humanism that exiploys an48 Governing (Through) Now Governmental Actors
sight xs nin language of conversation and negotiation. How to do this
‘efi the class lemma forthe academic Tam not haranicarin
Tamora human righ acs 1 a not human rights pocy-makec
[ive arte, worked inthe lor dhnred experiences of hi (iti
Wranewel te or been any pat the aleidosope of form and fancy
cine thaw st hcked away tether fr hours dating new lepilation
Sil puis before retort their real worlds. How coud 1 possibly
rae eeSepion of te practical sence ofthe intertonal an ight
‘eisantana non goverment organisation (INO) dha seeks shrough
aH ntons, todo good and save lives? How ean Io echo the sen
‘mat af thir hook, take a postion of dsatitacion offal towards
[Bu'wock of the poo guys? T have wo responses to this The Fists that
Tsu incest, i my ciqe ofthe role ofthe INGO, in an academ
career wih Pe of governmental ratonaty thats employed and
{bie fafens isell nthe working procedures and efits of these ight
aoe The seconds that eal eiqe i practical whist Tay ne
teetbagte in ednogeephy or fsehand search oot therein the el
[opal eal resench ofthe Kind Tatempe in his chaper sa way
‘ekki our the proceses of iteration! human hts pracie that
ett practical Sere wth rata implestons. am ths nerested
ir eer aciy of fansing orn blind els bin aking bat
Tie here good doesntematinsl humantaranism that employs a
Segeot rights do? The what ele’ does nor equate oad ees simply
pnt to making isle the ther ide the ‘ark sides! or the dangerous
‘cs of humanitarian through ight These are the sides where ruler
[ccrentd and operate wihout eponsbilsedhurantarian this where
‘EsStsmens happens inte name of les government and we do ne sop to
The ise of rulers io governance, INGOs reenbl the conte
son of governing whith | ent thoughout the bok a government
(chro ight To govern and nasimply rule, ay lgimate sovereign
Weeled «plowing care of expert,” These exper ar the humanitarian,
the igh acai who ae typically ened asthe "ood puss hey ae
‘human rights gr nena, the wider global human rights seine '
hough rps happen ough INGOn rio lace en om
Andis hn de ye etna ony res eh
ing of rights, and also how through rights these actors at eds
new kind of subject 3
toner ne
couse and how k manages INGOs ino sclepdton fc NCO OR
itself engapingin an eho aro the sls sso become and ean
a suitable participant in governance. The implications ofthis gover
bby civil society humsin rights actors, wh th vax Eve
halting questions soe howe INGOs ough kaha
tho tt say en ofthe cape hei
cen ae
‘scrutiniser contributes to a global governmentality of rights. vee
‘Let me first confess and address two ways in which my critique is perhaps
sites makes cones confton between te ome
of human rights and humanitarianism. These two dis ly
eo ics do obvi
since acpi human hes
humanitarian law, for example) and 30 perhaps requie cael
dleaanging fom ene another Ye, the
aso share the objcine of52 Governing (Through) Now Go
What : ie that the art of governing is given a new reality om which
tos the INGO relate to the other layers of actors within the global human
So eo a riuman Rights Watch comet withthe Uae
mow widely spoken 3
aman shy become rhe os common vesbalay
Ha spc vocabulsey thee is song overlap and kage Beween
tn the global human rights architecture. They are vocabularies chat
in cor such ar MSE, which exercses 2 medical human
ering lo the banc a neds sel ood, wate sania
Advancing the cause of
The Intemational Non-Gove
prolonging ties the concer of human cigs actor sch a HEW, The
‘Stn of hua gis for sl Pehas they area bt ores ene
Slog and espa, What es des
“on hs chaperone on RW ahaha hana
INGO. exominchow espera mae ath about gs ano ey
cneage in lfc llc which ae sures ad press of» kl
iia ight actor dat How
INGOs ae ‘the actor with which sates and regional and iteration
rgnisacons cooperate withthe lobl han eights architecture, They
are ‘other because they ae nonstate or cv acy actors, Reet bat
arsed for ‘spheres of Author a unis by which
2 ttecented focus based
nas forum acta poerune pac ta ae hoc unr
sem of govemmenaiy we we the power tatoo ar pore
ih donna hl wero atom, Thome they exe ae he
vernmental rationality by which civil society actors operate to eit
the atid role of ban rights INGOs tin hw they ako thee
Berdasarkan ruang lingkup permasalahan dan tujuan penelitian maka peneliti menggunakan desain penelitian pre-experimen yaitu one-group pretest posttest design dengan metode survey yaitu peneliti mengukur tingkat pengetahuan perawat yang bekerja di ruang IRD yang mengacu pada standar America Heart Association (AHA) 2005 sebelum diberi Pendidikan Nonformal BHD dan sesudah diberi Pe