Anda di halaman 1dari 174

TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Date: February 2006


Table of Contents

Section Page

Background………..…………………………………………………….…….1
Scope of Work…………………………………………………………….…..1
Rehabilitation Feasibility……………………………………………………...4
Cost Estimate………………………………………………………………….6
Appendix……………………………………………………………………...10
Summary of Recommendations………………………………………11
Tunnel Inspection Reports…………………………………………....12
Tunnel 1-2
Tunnel 1-3
Tunnel 1-4
Tunnel 3-5
Tunnel 3-46
Tunnel 4-6
Tunnel 6-8
Tunnel 6-28
Tunnel 8-8
Tunnel 25-26
Tunnel 28-29
Tunnel 29-30
Tunnel 31-32
Tunnel 31-33
Tunnel 31-38
Tunnel 31-44
Tunnel 32-32
Tunnel 72-73
Tunnel 73-74
Tunnel 74-75
ST. ELIZABETHS- WEST CAMPUS
Underground Tunnel Study

Background

St. Elizabeths, consisting of over 300 acres separated into West and East Campuses, is a
former mental hospital run by the Federal Government in Anacostia of SE Washington,
D.C. The entire compound has been declared a National Historic Landmark. The
Federal Government turned over operations of the hospital to the District of Columbia in
1987, while maintaining ownership of the West Campus.

The West Campus consists of 176 acres with 61 buildings which are in a deteriorated
state. The buildings are currently under renovation for future operations. A matrix of
underground tunnels on the West Campus exists between many of the buildings. The
West Campus contains buildings that date back to the earliest development of St.
Elizabeths Hospital (SEH), originally named Government Hospital for the Insane (GHI).
The hospital was also used to treat U.S. soldiers during the Civil War and has a Civil War
cemetery on the West Campus.

The early campus, 1855 to 1900, existed as a self-sufficient community. The campus
consisted of buildings for various functions such as General Kitchen, Bakery, Detached
Dining Hall, Detached Kitchen, Center Hall including the East and West Wings as well
as buildings for staff residence. These buildings were generally connected with an
underground tunnel with a small track bed, presumably used with carts for distribution of
materials.

In the absence of existing documentation on these tunnels, a convention for naming the
tunnel based on the building numbers that the tunnel connected was utilized. Eighteen
tunnels totaling 3,865 feet in length were inventoried, and the walk through inspection of
these tunnels was performed December 12 through 14, 2005. The presentation of results
from these structural assessments provides the purpose for this report.

Scope of Work

1) Current Structural Condition of Underground Tunnels

Assess the current structural condition of the existing underground tunnels and
recommend the necessary upgrades needed to restore these tunnels to a functional usable
space as a passageway for people and a passageway for utilities.

Observations from the site visit: An old utility drawing appears to indicate
roughly 33 tunnels totaling around 6,000 lf; however, many of these “tunnels” are
too small for passageways and deemed to be pipe chases for the steam and
condensate pipe system. The table on the following page lists the tunnels that
were assessed.

1
No. Name Building No./Name Building No./Name Length Type
1 1-3 1 Center Hall 3 West Wing 170 Basement
2 1-4 1 Center Hall 4 East Wing 170 Basement
3 3-5 3 West Wing 5 Garfield 425 Basement/Horseshoe
4 3-46 3 West Wing 46 Bakery 95 Basement
5 4-6 4 East Wing 6 Pine 305 Basement
6 6-8 6 Pine 8 Willow 110 Basement
7 6-28 6 Pine 28 Linden 120 Basement/Horseshoe
8 8-8 8 Willow 8 Willow 80 Basement
9 28-29 28 Linden 29 Holly 65 Horseshoe
10 29-30 29 Holly 30 Det. Nurses Home 55 Horseshoe
11 31-32 31 Atkins Hall 32 Relief 60 Horseshoe
12 31-33 T 31-44 33 Det. Dining Hall 75 Horseshoe
13 31-38 T 31-44 38 Hagen Hall 640 Horseshoe
14 31-44 31 Atkins Hall 44 Old Storeroom 405 Horseshoe
15 32-32 32 Relief (N) 32 Relief (S) 200 Basement
16 72-73 72 M Building 73 C Building 275 Basement
17 73-74 73 C Building 74 Administration 315 Basement
18 74-75 74 Administration 75 B Building 300 Basement
Total 3,865 LF

Two other tunnels were identified, one connecting the north and south ends of
Center Hall (Buildings 1 and 2); however, no track bed appears to exist. The
other tunnel connecting Allison A, Building 25 to Allison B, Building 26 has been
blocked off at each end.

At ground level, many of the surface vents were found to be accessible. Each
tunnel access inside the building was readily found directly under the main
stairway. Two types of “tunnels” were assessed; ten of the eighteen had track-
beds running along “basement” type hallways and six of the eighteen had track-
beds in brick or brick-lined arch or horseshoe type tunnels. Two of the tunnels
were combinations where a significant portion of the tunnel was basement type
while another significant portion was horseshoe type.

Tasks:

a) Assess current conditions of the existing underground tunnels. The tunnels


were structurally sound; however, the basement type particularly Tunnels 1-3,
1-4, 3-5, 4-6, and 6-8 where the tunnel ceiling is the floor above still have
sections where the floor above has not yet been replaced. Many of these areas
are significantly deteriorated and decayed to the point of collapse. The walls
were structurally sound with only minor mortar joint cracks.

The horseshoe type had some isolated areas of undermining under the floor pavers
(bricks); however, the floors were otherwise structurally sound. The walls and
arches were also sound; however, Tunnels 6-28, 31-44, and 31-38 cross

2
underneath roadways. At the time of the assessment, no evidence of Live Load
distress was noted. The thickness of the fill over the tunnel and under the
roadways was measured during the geotechnical investigation. Tunnel 6-28 is a
brick horseshoe type corridor which routes below the parking lot south of the East
Wing Building. Tunnels 31-38 and 31-44 are brick horseshoe type corridors
which partially run below roadways Redwood Drive and Hemlock Street. All
these tunnels have shallow cover ranging from 5” to 10.5” below the roadway.
Although preliminary calculations indicated that these tunnels will not be
overstressed by the standard HS 20 Live Load, they will be exposed to large
vibratory forces due to truck traffic on this shallow cover. Vibrations could
severely damage the mortar joints in the masonry and therefore require some
means of distributing this load over a larger area. Steel plates covered with
asphalt wearing surface placed on the roadways or parking lot immediately above
each of these tunnels could adequately distribute these vehicular traffic loads.

b) Recommend necessary upgrades needed to restore these tunnels to a functional


use as passageways for people or utilities. For the complete list, see
Recommendation Table in Appendix (page 11).

Basement Type Tunnels:

• Tunnels 1-3 and 1-4 both have areas where the ceiling (timber framed floor
above) has not yet been replaced. These areas need to be replaced or at a
minimum have shoring installed on a priority basis.

• To utilize Tunnels 1-3, 1-4, 3-46, 4-6, 6-8 and 8-8 as passageways for people
or utilities,
1) debris will need to be removed from the floor
2) electric lines will need to be replaced
3) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced

• To utilize Tunnels 73-74 and 74-75 as passageways for people or utilities,


1) electric lines will need to be replaced
2) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced

• To utilize Tunnel 32-32 as passageways for people or utilities,


1) debris will need to be removed from the floor

• To utilize Tunnel 72-73 as passageways for people or utilities,


1) the undermined area of the floor will need to be repaired
2) the electrical conduit will need repair/ replacement at one location

Horseshoe and Basement/Horseshoe Combination Tunnels:

• The brick-arch/horseshoe tunnels are generally too narrow to be utilized as a


passageway for people; however, they could readily be utilized as a
passageway for utilities.

3
• To utilize Tunnels 6-28, 28-29 and 29-30 as passageways for utilities,
1) debris will need to be removed from the floor
2) electric lines will need to be replaced
3) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced

• To utilize Tunnels 31-32 and 31-33 as passageways for utilities,


1) electric lines will need to be replaced
2) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced

• To utilize Tunnels 31-38 and 31-44 as passageways for utilities,


1) debris will need to be removed from the floor
2) electric lines will need to be replaced
3) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced
4) water leak through lining will need to be sealed

• Tunnel 3-5 has an area of severely deteriorated ceiling (timber floor above).
These timber members need to be replaced on a critical basis. Additionally
other distressed areas will require replacement on a priority basis. This
tunnel ends under Building 5 as a brick arch too narrow for people yet
adequate for utilities. Further, to utilize the basement portion as a
passageway for people or utilities,
1) debris will need to be removed from the floor
2) electric lines will need to be replaced
3) lighting conduit, fixtures and wiring will need to be replaced

• In addition to the above noted recommendations Tunnels 6-28, 31-38, and


31-44 pass underneath roadways and can be subjected to vehicular loads.
These vehicular loads will transfer vibrations that could severely damage
the mortar joints in the masonry. Therefore it is strongly
recommended that some means of distributing this load over a larger
area be utilized. Steel plates covered with asphalt wearing surface
placed on the roadways or parking lot would provide this means of
adequately distributing these vehicular traffic loads.

2) Rehabilitation Feasibility

Issue a report on feasibility (cost effectiveness) to stabilize and rebuild these tunnels to a
usable space as a passageway for people and a passageway for utilities.

Most of the basement type tunnels will be adequate for a passageway space for
pedestrians after recommended repairs have been made. Several of the basement
corridors do not have sufficient head clearance for passageways due to low
ceilings or low vertical clearance below pipes; however, will be acceptable for
maintenance access and routing utilities. The horseshoe type brick arch tunnels
will not be adequate for pedestrian passageways, but will be acceptable for pipe
chases and maintenance access.

4
Seven of the brick arch tunnels have inadequate vertical clearances for pedestrian
use. Tunnel 3-5 has a brick arch portion near the west end that is unsatisfactory
for pedestrian passage; however, the remainder will be sufficient for usage as a
passageway. Although these tunnels are inadequate for pedestrian use, they will
serve well as pipe chases. Tunnels 6-28, 28-29, 29-30, 31-33, 31-38, and 31-44
have restricted vertical clearance due to pipes running across the tunnels from
wall to wall. Tunnel 31-32 has a utility pipe running the length of the tunnel that
reduces the vertical clearance to an amount unsatisfactory for pedestrian traffic.

Tunnels 31-38 and 31-44 are brick horseshoe type corridors which partially run
below roadways. Tunnel 6-28 is a brick horseshoe type corridor which routes
below a parking lot. All three of these tunnels have a shallow cover ranging from
5” to 10.5” to the roadway above. Although these tunnels will not be utilized for
pedestrian traffic, we recommend the installation of steel plates overtopped with
asphalt placed on the roadways or parking lot above to adequately distribute the
vehicular traffic loads.

Horseshoe Type Tunnels (adequate for pipe chases only)


Name Building No. / Name Building No. / Name Length
3-5 3 West Wing 5 Garfield 75
6-28 6 Pine 28 Linden 70
28-29 28 Linden 29 Holly 65
29-30 29 Holly 30 Det. Nurses Home 55
31-32 31 Atkins Hall 32 Relief 60
31-33 T 31-44 33 Det. Dining Hall 75
31-38 T 31-44 38 Hagen Hall 640
31-44 31 Atkins Hall 44 Old Storeroom 405
Total 1445 LF

Tunnels 6-28, 72-73, and 74-75 have restricted vertical clearance due to pipes
running across the tunnels from wall to wall. Tunnel 72-73, additionally, has a
low ceiling to begin with, which causes the tunnel to appear constricted to
pedestrian traffic. Some of these tunnels have pipes protruding an undesirable
amount from the walls into the walkway.

Basement Type Tunnels (adequate for pipe chases only)


Name Building No. / Name Building No. / Name Length
6-28 6 Pine 28 Linden 50
72-73 72 M Building 73 C Building 275
74-75 74 Administration 75 B Building 300
Total 625 LF

5
Tunnels 1-3, 1-4, 3-46, 4-6, 6-8, 8-8, 32-32, 73-74, and part of 3-5 will be
acceptable for pedestrian passageways; however, will require some work before
use. The main items which must be performed prior to utilization of the tunnels
for pedestrian passageways involve debris removal, refurbishing of electrical
lines, and installation of a new lighting system. Occupancy codes will likely
require a sprinkler system to be installed in these tunnels, primarily in the
corridors without windows. Tunnels 1-3, 1-4, 3-5, 4-6, and 6-8 have ceilings
composed of timber flooring for the floor above. Some of these sections have
recently been or are in the process of being replaced while other sections were in
an advanced state of deterioration at the time of inspection.

Basement Type Tunnels (adequate for pedestrian use)


Name Building No. / Name Building No. / Name Length
1-3 1 Center Hall 3 West Wing 170
1-4 1 Center Hall 4 East Wing 170
3-5 3 West Wing 5 Garfield 350
3-46 3 West Wing 46 Bakery 95
4-6 4 East Wing 6 Pine 305
6-8 6 Pine 8 Willow 110
8-8 8 Willow 8 Willow 80
32-32 32 Relief (N) 32 Relief (S) 200
73-74 73 C Building 74 Administration 315
Total 1795

3) Cost Estimate

Include a cost estimates for design and construction to upgrade/restore the tunnels to
useable space.

All the tunnels will need basic maintenance items addressed in order to be utilized
for either pedestrian use or pipe chases with maintenance access. The basic
repairs are lighting and electrical modifications, as well as debris removal. A
couple of the tunnels have some water leakage through an area on a wall and local
undermined areas beneath the floor. These are shown in the estimated cost tables
on the following pages. The estimated costs include all material and labor
necessary to perform the work.

The table on the following page shows estimated repair costs for nine basement
type tunnels that are adequate for pedestrian use and pipe chases. Estimated
repair costs shown on the following table for tunnel 3-5 are only for the basement
type portion which will handle pedestrian traffic.

6
Basement Type Tunnels (utility and pedestrian use)
Tunnel Recommendation Quantity Unit Unit Cost Est. Cost
$ $
Remove debris from floor. 10 CY 220 2200
1-3 Replace electric lines. 170 LF 4 680
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 170 LF 6.5 1105

Remove debris from floor. 20 CY 220 4400


1-4 Replace electric lines. 170 LF 4 680
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 170 LF 6.5 1105

Remove debris from floor. 45 CY 220 9900


3-5
Replace electric lines. 350 LF 4 1400
(partial)
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 350 LF 6.5 2275

Replace electric lines. 95 LF 4 380


3-46
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 95 LF 6.5 620

Remove debris from floor. 5 CY 220 1100


4-6 Replace electric lines. 305 LF 4 1220
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 305 LF 6.5 1985

Remove debris from floor. 5 CY 220 1100


6-8 Replace electric lines. 110 LF 4 440
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 110 LF 6.5 715

Remove debris from floor. 2 CY 220 440


8-8 Replace electric lines. 80 LF 4 320
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 80 LF 6.5 520

32-32 Remove debris from floor. 1 CY 220 220

Replace electric lines. 315 LF 4 1260


73-74
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 315 LF 6.5 2050
Total 36,200

The table below shows estimated repair costs for three basement type tunnels that
are not adequate for mainstream pedestrian use; however, are adequate for pipe
chases and maintenance access. All three of these tunnels as described in section
2 are deemed undesirable for pedestrian use due to low vertical clearances.

Basement Type Tunnels (utility and maintenance access use only)


Tunnel Recommendation Quantity Unit Unit Cost Est. Cost
$ $
Remove debris from floor. 2 CY 220 440
6-28
Replace electric lines. 50 LF 4 200
(partial)
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 50 LF 6.5 325

Repair undermined area of floor. 50 SF 80 4000


72-73
Repair electrical conduit at kink in tunnel. 2 LF 250 500

74-75 Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 300 LF 6.5 1950


Total 7,500

7
The following table shows estimated repair costs for eight horseshoe type tunnels
that are inadequate for pedestrian use. Estimated repair costs shown below for
tunnel 3-5 are only for the horseshoe type portion that will not adequately handle
pedestrian traffic. Tunnel 6-28 is composed of a combination of both basement
and horseshoe type tunnels. The horseshoe type portion is tabulated below.

Horseshoe Type Tunnels (utility and maintenance access use only)


Tunnel Recommendation Quantity Unit Unit Cost Est. Cost
$ $
Remove debris from floor. 5 CY 220 1100
3-5
Replace electric lines. 75 LF 4 300
(partial)
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 75 LF 6.5 490

Remove debris from floor. 3 CY 220 660


6-28
Replace electric lines. 70 LF 4 280
(partial)
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 70 LF 6.5 455

Replace electric lines. 65 LF 4 260


28-29
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 65 LF 6.5 425

Remove debris from floor. 2 CY 220 440


29-30 Replace electric lines. 55 LF 4 220
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 55 LF 6.5 360

Replace electric lines. 60 LF 4 240


31-32
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 60 LF 6.5 390

Replace electric lines. 75 LF 4 300


31-33
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 75 LF 6.5 490

Remove debris from floor. 20 CY 220 4400


Replace electric lines. 640 LF 4 2560
31-38
Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 640 LF 6.5 4160
Repair water leak in lining near south end. 1 LUMP SUM 5000 5000

Repair undermined brick floor at west end. 50 SF 40 2000


Replace lighting conduits and wiring. 405 LF 6.5 2635
31-44
Repair water leak in north wall lining. 1 LUMP SUM 5000 5000
Remove debris from floor. 5 CY 220 1100
Total 33,300

8
A portion of tunnels 6-28, 31-38, and 31-44 run below a roadway or parking lot.
The amount of cover over these tunnels ranges from 5” to 10.5”. Due to this
shallow depth of cover, it is recommended that a steel plate be placed below the
asphalt wearing surface to evenly distribute the loads and minimize any vibrations
from vehicular traffic. The estimated costs tabulated below include a ¾” thick
steel plate, asphalt removal, asphalt placement, and associated labor to perform
the work.

Horseshoe Type Tunnels Below Roadways and Parking Lot


Tunnel Recommendation Quantity Unit Est. Cost
$
6-28 Place steel plate and asphalt overlay above tunnel. 1 Lump Sum 15,000

31-38 Place steel plate and asphalt overlay above tunnel. 1 Lump Sum 15,000

31-44 Place steel plate and asphalt overlay above tunnel. 1 Lump Sum 15,000
Total 45,000

The table below summarizes the total estimated cost by tunnel type. The tunnels
are grouped as described in the preceding tables.

Summary of Estimated Costs by Tunnel Type


Type Est. Cost
$
Basement Type Tunnels (utility and pedestrian use) 36,200

Basement Type Tunnels (utility and maintenance access use only) 7,500

Horseshoe Type Tunnels (utility and maintenance access use only) 33,300

Horseshoe Type Tunnels Below Roadways and Parking Lot 45,000


Total 122,000

9
APPENDIX
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Tunnel Critical Priority Routine


1-3 None Shore or replace 1. Remove debris from floor, 10 CY.
deteriorated timber 2. Replace electric lines, 170 LF.
flooring not yet 3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 170 LF.
repaired.
1-4 None Shore or replace 1. Remove debris from floor, 20 CY.
deteriorated timber 2. Replace electric lines, 170 LF.
flooring not yet 3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 170 LF.
repaired.
3-5 Shore or replace Shore or replace 1. Remove debris accumulation, 50 CY.
deteriorated deteriorated timber 2. Replace electric lines, 425 LF.
timber flooring, flooring not yet 3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 425 LF.
above, 200 SF. repaired.
3-46 None None 1. Replace electric lines, 95 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 95 LF.
4-6 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 305 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 305 LF.
6-8 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 110 LF.
3. Replace electric lines, 110 LF.
6-28 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 120 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 120 LF.
8-8 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 2 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 80 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 80 LF.
28-29 None None 1. Replace electric lines, 65 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 65 LF.
29-30 None None 1. Replace electric lines, 55 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 55 LF.
3. Remove debris from floor, 2 CY.
31-32 None None 1. Replace electrical lines, 60 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduit and wiring, 60 LF.
31-33 None None 1. Replace electrical lines, 75 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 75 LF.
31-38 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 20 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 640 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 640 LF.
4. Repair water leak through lining near south end, Lump Sum.
31-44 None None 1. Repair undermined brick floor at west end of tunnel, 50 SF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 405 LF.
3. Repair water leak through north wall, Lump Sum.
4. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
32-32 None None 1. Remove debris from floor, 1 CY.
72-73 None None 1. Repair electrical conduit at kink in tunnel, 2 LF.
2. Repair undermined area of floor, 50 SF.
73-74 None None 1. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 315 LF.
2. Replace electric lines, 315 LF.
74-75 None None 1. Replace lighting conduit and wiring, 300 LF.

11
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1 & 2

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-2
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick/Stone Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length N/A Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 1 Entry Through Building 1, 2
End Building 2
Tunnel previously connected the basement of Building 1, Center Hall North to the basement of
Building 2, Center Hall South. Currently no evidence of the track way exists; the main chamber under
the building appears to be more basement than tunnel.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-2
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Currently no evidence of the track way exists; the main chamber under the building appears to
be more basement than tunnel. Building 1 was at the north end of the tunnel and Building 2 is
at the south end. The walls are composed of brick and stone masonry.

RECOMMENDATIONS

No Repairs Required

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
None.

Page 2 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-2
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL N
1. LINING N
2. PORTALS N
3. FLOOR N
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE N
5. VENTILATION N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES N
1. STEAM N
2. WATER N
3. ELECTRICAL N
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-2
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 4
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1 & 3

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 170 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 1 Entry Through Building 1, 3
End Building 3
Tunnel connects the basement level of Buildings 1 & 2, Center Hall to the basement level of Building
3, West Wing.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 170 feet long and runs between Buildings 1 and 3. Building 1 is at the east end
of the tunnel and Building 3 is at the west end. The tunnel walls are composed of brick and
stone masonry and are in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include steam, water, electrical, and communication (telephone). Minor problems at this time
include several vertical cracks on the walls, moderate to heavy debris scattered on the floor,
and deteriorated utilities. A more serious problem involves areas of deteriorated timber floor
system above.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
1. Shore or replace deteriorated timber flooring above not yet repaired.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 10 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 170 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 170 LF.

Page 2 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 5 59.1 Several minor vertical cracks on walls. Sections of


1. LINING F timber flooring above have been replaced while other
2. PORTALS G sections remain in a deteriorated state.
3. FLOOR G 59.6 Moderate to heavy debris scattered throughout areas.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.1,2,3,6 Moderate to heavy corrosion on utility pipes and
5. VENTILATION G conduits. Some sections of pipes, conduits, and wiring
6. OTHER (Debris) F are sagging and hanging from ceiling.
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (Telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal

Photo 2: West portal

Page 4 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: Looking east, east portal in distance; Note hanging electric and phone wires

Photo 4: Looking west; Note hanging conduits and wires

Page 5 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: Looking west; Note new timber floor above and hanging utilities

Photo 6: Debris on floor

Page 6 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-3
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 7: West portal, east face; Note vertical crack on south side

Photo 8: Debris on floor, looking west

Page 7 of 7
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1 & 4

WEST PORTAL

EAST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 170 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 1 Entry Through Building 1, 2
End Building 4
Tunnel connects the basement level of Buildings 1 & 2, Center Hall to the basement level of Building
4, East Wing.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 170 feet long and runs between Buildings 1 and 4. Building 4 is at the east end
of the tunnel and Building 1 is at the west end. The tunnel lining is composed of brick and
stone masonry and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include steam, water, electrical, and communication (telephone). Minor problems at this time
include debris scattered throughout floor and deteriorated utilities. A more serious problem
involves areas of deteriorated timber floor system above.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
1. Shore or replace areas of deteriorated timber flooring not yet repaired.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 20 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 170 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 170 LF.

Page 2 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 5 59.1 Sections of timber flooring above have been replaced
1. LINING F while other sections remain in a deteriorated state.
2. PORTALS G 59.6 Moderate to heavy debris scattered throughout floor in
3. FLOOR G areas.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.1,2,3,6 Moderate to heavy corrosion on pipes and conduits.
5. VENTILATION G Utilities are sagging and hanging from ceiling at east
6. OTHER (Debris) P end of tunnel.
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (Telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: West portal

Photo 2: East portal

Page 4 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: General view of lining

Photo 4: Deteriorated timber floor system above;


Note new flooring in adjacent area

Page 5 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1-4
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Heavy debris on floor

Photo 6: Unsupported and hanging utilities; Note debris on floor

Page 6 of 6
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 3 & 5

WEST PORTAL

EAST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 7.0 FT


Total Length 425.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 3 Entry Through Building 3
End Building 5
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 3, West Wing to the basement level of Building 5,
Garfield.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 425 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between Buildings 3 and 5. Building 3 is
at the east end of the tunnel and Building 5 is at the west end. The tunnel lining is composed
of brick, stone masonry, and timber and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the
time of inspection include water, steam, and electric; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include debris accumulation and deteriorated utilities. A more critical
problem involves areas of deteriorated timber floor system above, some of which is settling.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
1. Shore or replace deteriorated and settled timber flooring above, 200 SF.

Priority Repairs:
1. Shore or replace rest of deteriorated timber flooring above not yet repaired.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris accumulation, 50 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 425 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 425 LF.

Page 2 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 5 59.1 Sections of timber flooring above have been replaced
1. LINING F while other sections remain in a deteriorated state. One
2. PORTALS G section of deteriorated timber flooring above is settling.
3. FLOOR G 59.6 Minor to moderate debris scattered along floor. Heavy
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G debris accumulation near west end of tunnel.
5. VENTILATION G 402.1,2,3 Moderate to heavy corrosion on pipes and conduits.
6. OTHER (Debris) F Conduit near west end has an area of total section loss.
7. OTHER N 402.3,6 Conduits and wiring sagging and hanging from ceiling.
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: West portal, bricked off

Photo 2: East portal

Page 4 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: Deteriorated and settled timber flooring above

Photo 4: General view of tunnel, looking west from east portal

Page 5 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: General view of tunnel deteriorated timber flooring above, looking west;
Note and corrosion on conduits and hanging wiring

Photo 6: Heavy debris on floor; Note hanging wiring

Page 6 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 7: Heavy debris on floor; Note hanging pipe, conduits, and wiring

Photo 8: East portal of arch portion at west end of tunnel; Note heavy debris on floor

Page 7 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 9: General view of lining, looking east from west portal

Photo 10: Corrosion on steam pipe, south wall

Page 8 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-5
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 11: Corrosion on steam pipe in arch section of tunnel near west end

Photo 12: Corrosion with total section loss on conduit

Page 9 of 9
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 3 & 46

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 95.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 3 Entry Through Building 3
End Building 46
Tunnel previously connected the basement level of Building 3, West Wing to the basement level of
Building 46, Bakery. Currently the passage way at Building 46 is blocked off preventing access to the
Bakery.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 95 feet long and runs between buildings 3 and 46. Building 3 is at the north end
of the tunnel and building 46 is at the south end. The tunnel lining is composed of brick, stone
masonry, and timber and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of
inspection include steam, water, electrical and communication (telephone). Minor problems at
this time include deteriorated utilities and minor debris on floor.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace electric lines, 95 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 95 LF.

Page 2 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.6 Minor debris on floor.


1. LINING G 402.1,2,3 Moderate corrosion on utility pipes
2. PORTALS G 402.6 Corroded wires with kinked and sagging sections.
3. FLOOR G
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER (Debris) F
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (Telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: Looking north from south portal

Photo 4: Looking south toward south portal

Page 5 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3-46
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: Looking north toward north portal;


Note minor debris on floor

Photo 6: Blocked access way to Building 46

Page 6 of 6
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 4 & 6

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick, Stone Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 305 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 4 Entry Through Building 1
End Building 6
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 4, East Wing to the basement level of Building 6, Pine.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 305 feet long and runs between Buildings 4 and 6. Building 6 is at the east end
of the tunnel and Building 4 is at the west end. The tunnel lining is composed of brick and
stone rubble and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include light debris accumulation and deteriorated utilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 305 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 305 LF.

Page 2 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.6 Minor debris on floor in areas throughout.


1. LINING G 402.1,2,3 Moderate to heavy corrosion on pipes and conduits. Some
2. PORTALS G pipes and conduits are unsupported and hanging from
3. FLOOR G ceiling.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.6 Telephone lines are loose from ceiling and hanging in
5. VENTILATION G areas.
6. OTHER (debris) F
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 7
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (Telephone) F
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal

Photo 2: West portal

Page 4 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: General view looking west from east portal; Note hanging wiring

Photo 4: General view looking west; Note debris on floor,


hanging wiring, and corrosion on pipes

Page 5 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: General view looking west

Photo 6: Debris on floor; Note hanging conduits

Page 6 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4-6
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 7: Corrosion on piping and conduits

Photo 8: Hanging pipe near west end; Note corrosion on piping and conduits

Page 7 of 7
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 6 & 8

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 6.6 FT


Total Length 110.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 6 Entry Through Building 8
End Building 8
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 6, Pine to the basement level of Building 8, Willow.
Currently access is permitted through the stairwell in Building 8; however, the original hallway that the
rails entered at Building 8 has been closed with masonry block.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 110 feet long and runs between Buildings 6 and 8. Building 8 is at the east end
of the tunnel and Building 6 is at the west end. The tunnel lining is composed of brick, timber,
and concrete and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include debris on floor and deteriorated utilities unsupported in areas.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 110 LF.
3. Replace electric lines, 110 LF.

Page 2 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.6 Minor to moderate debris scattered on floor.


1. LINING G 402.1 Steam pipes are wrapped with exposed sections showing
2. PORTALS G signs of moderate corrosion.
3. FLOOR G 402.2,3 Heavy corrosion on water pipes and electrical conduits.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.6 Phone wires loose from ceiling with loss of coating.
5. VENTILATION G 402.1,2,3,6 Utilities are loose and unsupported in areas.
6. OTHER (Debris) F
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal; Note blocked off access way

Photo 2: West portal; Note hanging and unsupported utilities

Page 4 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: Looking west from east portal;


Note minor debris and dampness on floor

Photo 4: Looking east; Note debris and sagging cable

Page 5 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Looking west toward west portal; Note debris and unsupported utilities

Photo 6: Looking south at access to Building 28

Page 6 of 6
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 6 & 28

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 6.5 FT


Total Length 120.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 6 Entry Through Building 28
End Building 28
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 6, Pine to the basement level of Building 28, Linden.
Currently access is permitted through the stairwell in Building 28.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 120 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between Buildings 6 and 28. Building 28
is at the south end of the tunnel and Building 6 is at the north end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor problems at this
time include debris on the floor and deteriorated utilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 120 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 120 LF.

Page 2 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.2 Separated bricks along arch ring on west side of south
1. LINING G portal.
2. PORTALS F 59.6, Minor to heavy debris on floor. Water utility on floor.
3. FLOOR G 402.2
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.2,3,6 Moderate to heavy corrosion on pipes and conduits.
5. VENTILATION G Sections of electrical and phone wiring hanging from
6. OTHER (debris) F ceiling.
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM N
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: Looking north at south portal from Building 28

Photo 4: General view of lining, looking north from south portal

Page 5 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Deteriorated mortar joints on west wall of south portal, looking north

Photo 6: Deteriorated mortar joints on west wall of south portal, looking south

Page 6 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 7: Missing bricks at vault connecting to Building 6

Photo 8: Debris on floor near entrance to Building 6

Page 7 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 6-28
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 9: Corrosion on conduits; Note damaged light fixture

Photo 10: Hanging telephone and electric wires at north end of arch;
Note corrosion on conduit

Page 8 of 8
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL UNDER BUILDING 8

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 80.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 8 Entry Through Building 8
End Building 8
Tunnel previously connected to the basement level of Building 6, Pine to the basement level of
Building 8, Willow. Currently, a masonry block wall seals off the direct connection to Tunnel 6-8.
Now Tunnel 8-8 primarily services the basement of building 8.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 80 feet long and runs below Building 8. Building 6 is to the west of the tunnel
below Building 8. The tunnel lining is composed of brick, masonry block, concrete, and
timber and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection include
water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor problems at this
time include debris on the floor and deteriorated utilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 2 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 80 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 80 LF.

Page 2 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.6 Minor to moderate debris on floor.


1. LINING G 402.1,2,3 Moderate corrosion on pipes and conduits.
2. PORTALS G 402.6 Phone wiring hanging in areas.
3. FLOOR G
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER (debris) F
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal

Photo 2: West portal, east side

Page 4 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: General view of lining, looking east

Photo 4: East end of rails; Note debris on floor and hanging telephone wire

Page 5 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8-8
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Debris on floor, looking east from west portal

Photo 6: Damage light fixture; Note corrosion on pipe and conduits

Page 6 of 6
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 25 & 26

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 25-26
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length N/A Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 25 Entry Through Building N/A
End Building 26
Tunnel previously connected the basement level of Building 25, Allison A to the basement level of
Building 26, Allison B. Currently a masonry block wall prevents access in the basement of Building
25, while the stairwell is bolted shut inside Building 26. No other entries were found.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 25-26
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel runs between Buildings 25 and 26. Building 25 is at the east end of the tunnel and
Building 26 is at the west end. The tunnel could not be accessed due to a bolted shut door at
Building 26 and a blocked in doorway at Building 25.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
None.

Page 2 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 25-26
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL N 59, 402 Could not access tunnel due to blocked in and bolted
1. LINING N entrances.
2. PORTALS N
3. FLOOR N
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE N
5. VENTILATION N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES N
1. STEAM N
2. WATER N
3. ELECTRICAL N
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 4
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 25-26
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal; Note blocked in entrance

Photo 2: West portal; Note bolted shut door

Page 4 of 4
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 28 & 29

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 6.4 FT *


Total Length 65.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 5.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 28 Entry Through Building 28
End Building 29
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 28, Linden to the basement level of Building 29, Holly.
Currently, access is permitted through the stairwell in Building 28.
* 4.75 FT vertical clearance below pipe across tunnel near south portal

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 65 feet long by 5 feet wide and runs between Buildings 28 and 29. Building 28
is at the north end of the tunnel and Building 29 is at the south end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include deteriorated mortar at both portals and deteriorated utilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace electric lines, 65 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 65 LF.

Page 2 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor loss of mortar in several areas throughout. Minor
1. LINING F water seepage through west wall near north and south
2. PORTALS F portals.
3. FLOOR G 59.2 Moderate loss of mortar around top of arch ring at north
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G and south portals.
5. VENTILATION G 59.3 Piping and minor debris on floor.
6. OTHER N 402.1,2,3,6 Moderate corrosion on pipes and conduits. Exposed
7. OTHER N wiring on conduit at south portal. Sagging and corroded
8. OTHER N wiring in areas.

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: Looking north from Building 29

Photo 4: General view of lining, looking toward north portal;


Note water seepage on west wall

Page 5 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Water seepage through west wall below pipe near south portal;
Note sagging electric line and corrosion on conduits

Photo 6: Deteriorated mortar between bricks around top of arch, north portal;
Note corrosion on conduits

Page 6 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 7: Deteriorated mortar between bricks around top of arch, south portal

Photo 8: Corrosion on conduits at south portal; Note exposed wires

Page 7 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 28-29
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 9: Corrosion on conduits

Photo 10: Debris and piping on floor, looking north from south portal

Page 8 of 8
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 29 & 30

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/13/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 6.5 FT


Total Length 55.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT * Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 29 Entry Through Building 30
End Building 30
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 29, Holly to the basement level of Building 30, The
Detached Nurses Home. Currently access is permitted through the stairwell in Building 30.
* width limited to 4 FT at south portal and 5 FT at north portal

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 55 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between Buildings 29 and 30. Building 29
is at the north end of the tunnel and Building 30 is at the south end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include deteriorated utilities, debris on the floor, and a tripping hazard
due to a concrete cap over a utility across the floor.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace electric lines, 55 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 55 LF.
3. Remove debris from floor, 2 CY.

Page 2 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.3 Floor is covered with dirt and debris. Floor is out of
1. LINING G level in some areas. Utility concrete cap passing across
2. PORTALS G tunnel floor creates a tripping hazard.
3. FLOOR F 402.1,2,3,6 Moderate to heavy corrosion on pipes and conduits.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G Sagging wires in several locations.
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal; Note utility concrete cap across floor

Page 4 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 3: Debris on floor and corroded pipe along west wall;


Note utility concrete cap across floor

Photo 4: Corrosion on pipe and conduits along ceiling;


Note corrosion on pipe crossing below conduits near south portal

Page 5 of 6
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 29-30
INSPECTION DATE: 12/13/05

Photo 5: Open junction box on conduit at north portal

Photo 6: Damaged light fixture on east wall

Page 6 of 6
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 31 & 32

WEST PORTAL

EAST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/12/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 7.0 FT


Total Length 60.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 31 Entry Through Building 31
End Building 32
Tunnel previously connected the basement level of Building 31, Atkins Hall and the basement level of
Building 32, Relief. Currently, the stairwell outside of Building 44 is bricked off eliminating access.
Access is gained from Building 31.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 60 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between Building 31 and Building 32.
Building 32 is at the east end of the tunnel and building 31 is at the west end. The tunnel lining
is composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of
inspection include water, steam, and electric; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include deteriorated mortar joints in lining, busted bricks at north portal
for routing pipes, vertical crack at south portal, and corrosion of utility pipes and conduits.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace electrical lines, 60 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduit and wiring, 60 LF.

Page 2 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor to moderate deterioration of brick lining mortar


1. LINING F joints.
2. PORTALS F 59.2 Vertical crack through bricks on east side of south portal.
3. FLOOR G Busted bricks for water pipes routing through north portal.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.1,2 Steam and water pipes have moderate to heavy corrosion.
5. VENTILATION G Steam pipe is supported by timber shoring at south portal.
6. OTHER N 402.3 Electrical and lighting conduits have moderate to heavy
7. OTHER N corrosion.
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: West portal in basement of Building 31, Atkins Hall

Photo 2: East portal near Building 32, Relief

Page 4 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 3: General view looking east from west portal

Photo 4: General view looking west toward east portal

Page 5 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 5: Vertical crack in bricks on east side of south portal

Photo 6: Busted bricks for routing water pipes through north portal

Page 6 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 7: Corrosion on steam and water pipes at west portal;


Note timber support below steam pipe

Photo 8: Typical corrosion on lighting conduit

Page 7 of 7
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 31 & 33

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/12/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-33
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 7.0 FT


Total Length 75.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 31 Entry Through Building 31
End Building 33
Tunnel connects between tunnel 31-44 and the basement level of Building 33, The Detached Dining
Hall. Currently the stairwell outside of Building 44 is bricked off eliminating access. Access is also
blocked into Building 33.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-33
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 75 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between tunnel 31-44 and Building 33.
Tunnel 31-44 is at the north end of the tunnel and Building 33 is at the south end. The tunnel
lining is composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of
inspection include water, steam, and electric; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include deteriorated mortar joints in the lining, chipped bricks at the
north portal, and deteriorated utilities throughout.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace electrical lines, 75 LF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 75 LF.

Page 2 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-33
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor deterioration of mortar joints throughout.


1. LINING F 59.2 Chipped bricks along edge of north portal due to routing of
2. PORTALS F steam pipe. South portal is closed with doorways nailed
3. FLOOR G shut.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.1,2 Moderate corrosion of steam and water lines.
5. VENTILATION G 402.3 Electrical and lighting wires are draped along walls.
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-33
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal; Note chipped bricks

Photo 2: South portal; Note downed and sagging electrical lines

Page 4 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-33
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 3: Downed wiring at north end of tunnel, junction with tunnel 31-44

Photo 4: Corrosion on steam and water pipes, north portal

Page 5 of 5
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 31 & 38

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/12/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 7.0 FT


Total Length 640.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building T-31-44 Entry Through Building 31
End Building 38
Tunnel connects between Tunnel 31-44 and an intersection with three steam pipe chases, south of the
basement level of Building 38, Hagen Hall. Currently, the stairwell outside of Building 44 is bricked
off eliminating access. There is also an old elevator shaft from the tunnel to Building 34.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 640 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between tunnel 31-44 at the north end and
building 38 at the south end. The tunnel lining is composed of brick and is in fair condition.
Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection include water, steam, and electric; none of
which were functioning. Minor problems at this time include minor deterioration of the brick
lining mortar joints, corrosion of the utility pipes, deteriorated lighting conduits and wiring,
downed electric lines, and scattered debris on the floor.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 20 CY.
2. Replace electric lines, 640 LF.
3. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 640 LF.
4. Repair water leak through lining near south end, Lump Sum.

Page 2 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor mortar deterioration throughout brick lining with
1. LINING F chipped or missing bricks in several locations.
2. PORTALS F 59.3 Moderate to heavy debris scattered along the floor.
3. FLOOR F 59.4 Shallow ponding water at south end near large steam pipes,
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G but water appears to be draining out of tunnel.
5. VENTILATION G 402.1,2 Light to moderate corrosion on steam and water pipe lines.
6. OTHER N Sections of the water lines are sagging due to lack of
7. OTHER N support or wire hangers.
8. OTHER N 402.3 Electric lines are sagging and down in many areas along the
west wall. The lighting conduit along the ceiling has heavy
corrosion throughout with exposed wiring.
401. ACCESS ROOM N
1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North Portal

Photo 2: South Portal

Page 4 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 3: General view looking north from Building 34; Note downed electric lines

Photo 4: Typical deteriorated mortar joints in lining; Note chipped and missing ceiling brick

Page 5 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 5: Chipped bricks on ceiling around vent hole

Photo 6: General view of elevator shaft to Building 34, east side

Page 6 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 7: General view of storage room across from elevator to Building 34, west side

Photo 8: General view, looking south from Building 34

Page 7 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 9: Damaged timber gate, 20’ south of north portal

Photo 10: Typical debris on floor, looking north from Building 34

Page 8 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 11: Water running and draining along floor near south end

Photo 12: Vent to tunnel, Building 34 in background

Page 9 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 13: Vent to tunnel near Building 34

Photo 14: Utility tunnel from east wall near Building 34 to Building 36;
Note corrosion on steam and water lines

Page 10 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 15: Rusted utility pipes and downed electric lines adjacent to
tunnel to Building 36; Note debris on floor

Photo 16: Water pipe hanging by wire from rusted pipe; Note sag in water pipe

Page 11 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 17: Moderate rust on pipe; Note water line suspended by wire

Photo 18: Steam pipe over north portal

Page 12 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 19: General view of rusted valves and piping, north of tunnel to Building 36

Photo 20: Rusted valve and piping at Building 38

Page 13 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 21: Disconnected 4” diameter copper pipe

Photo 22: Corrosion on steam pipes at south end

Page 14 of 15
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-38
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 23: Heavy corrosion on lighting conduit; Note exposed wiring at light fixture

Photo 24: General view of downed lighting

Page 15 of 15
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 31 & 44

EAST PORTAL

WEST PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/12/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 7.0 FT


Total Length 405.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 6.0 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 31 Entry Through Building 31
End Building 44
Tunnel previously connected the basement level of Building 31, Atkins Hall to the basement level of
Building 44, The Old Storeroom. Currently the stairwell outside of Building 44 is bricked off
eliminating access. Tunnel is accessed from Building 31.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 405 feet long by 6 feet wide and runs between buildings 31 and 44. Building 31
is at the east end of the tunnel and building 44 is at the west end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and is in fair condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time of inspection
include water, steam, and electric; none of which were functioning. Minor problems at this
time include minor deterioration of the brick lining mortar joints, deteriorated floor at the west
end, corrosion of the utility pipes, deteriorated lighting conduits and wiring, sagging electric
and telephone lines, and minor debris on the floor.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Repair undermined brick floor at west end of tunnel, 50 SF.
2. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 405 LF.
3. Repair water leak through north wall, Lump Sum.
4. Remove debris from floor, 5 CY.

Page 2 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor deterioration of mortar joints in brick lining.


1. LINING F 59.2 Chipped bricks at portals due to routing of pipes.
2. PORTALS F 59.3 Moderate erosion and undermining of brick floor at west
3. FLOOR F end (corner below Building 44). Minor debris on floor.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 59.4 Water draining through north wall near mid-length of
5. VENTILATION G tunnel and draining out through floor.
6. OTHER N 402.1,2 Steam and water utilities have moderate to heavy corrosion.
7. OTHER N 402.3,6 Electrical lines for lighting and telephone cables are
8. OTHER N sagging. Lighting conduit has moderate corrosion.

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. TELEPHONE P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: East portal at basement of Building 31, Atkins Hall

Photo 2: West portal at basement of Building 44, Old Storeroom;


Note blocked stairwell to Building 44

Page 4 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 3: General view looking east from elbow below Building 44;
Note debris on floor and corrosion on pipes

Photo 4: General view near west end; Note sagging cables

Page 5 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 5: General view of arched ceiling near west end of tunnel

Photo 6: Detail view of arched ceiling near west end of tunnel

Page 6 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 7: Water entering north wall through galvanized pipe,


west of tunnel 31-38 north portal

Photo 8: Typical support for telephone cable, south wall

Page 7 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 31-44
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 9: General view looking west toward east portal in basement of Building 31, Atkins Hall

Photo 10: Blocked stairwell to west end of tunnel

Page 8 of 8
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL UNDER BUILDING 32

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/12/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 32-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height N/A


Total Length 200 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width N/A Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 32 Entry Through Building 31
End Building 32
Tunnel consists of basement rooms below Building 32, Relief.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 32-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 200 feet long and consists of connected rooms beneath Building 32. Building 32
is above the tunnel and runs from north to south. The walls are composed of brick and are in
fair condition. Utilities within the rooms at the time of inspection include water, steam, and
electric; none of which were functioning. Some of the track system has been concreted over.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Remove debris from floor, 1 CY.

Page 2 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 32-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.3 Remnants of tile flooring covering sections of concreted


1. LINING G over track bed. Minor debris on floor.
2. PORTALS G
3. FLOOR G
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 7
1. STEAM G
2. WATER G
3. ELECTRICAL G
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 32-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South Portal

Page 4 of 5
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 32-32
INSPECTION DATE: 12/12/05

Photo 3: General view looking north

Photo 4: Remnants of tile floor covering track bed

Page 5 of 5
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 72 & 73

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick,concrete Tunnel Height 6.3 FT *


Total Length 275.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 5.4 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 72 Entry Through Building 73
End Building 73
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 72, M Building to the basement level of Building 73, C
Building. Currently the stairwell inside of Building 72 is sealed off eliminating street access.
* 5.1 FT vertical clearance below encased pipe near south portal

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 275 feet long by 5.4 feet wide and runs between Buildings 72 and 73. Building
72 is at the south end of the tunnel and Building 73 is at the north end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and concrete and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time
of inspection include water, steam, and electric; none of which were functioning. Minor
problems at this time include several cracks on walls and ceiling, undermined area of floor near
north end, and deteriorated utilities.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Repair electrical conduit at kink in tunnel, 2 LF.
2. Repair undermined area of floor, 50 SF.

Page 2 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 6 59.1 Minor vertical cracks on walls and transverse cracks on
1. LINING G ceiling.
2. PORTALS G 59.3 Undermined area of floor near north end.
3. FLOOR F 402.1,2 Moderate rust on pipes.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G 402.3 Total section loss on conduit at kink in tunnel (about 140 ft
5. VENTILATION G from south end). Minor corrosion along conduits. Old
6. OTHER N conduits with exposed open junction boxes exist in wall.
7. OTHER N 402.6 Phone wires are cut.
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL F
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. OTHER (telephone) P
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal, south side

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: Sealed access doorway at stairway into Building 72

Photo 4: Vertical Cracking on walls and transverse cracking on ceiling

Page 5 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: Corrosion on utility pipes

Photo 6: Deteriorated conduit with total section loss; Note exposed wires

Page 6 of 7
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 72-73
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 7: Open junction boxes in wall for old electrical conduits

Photo 8: Corrosion on unwrapped portion of pipe

Page 7 of 7
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 73 & 74

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 9.3 FT


Total Length 315.0 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 8.2 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 73 Entry Through Building 74
End Building 74
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 73, C Building to the basement level of Building 74,
The Administration Building.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 315 feet long by 8.2 feet wide and runs between buildings 73 and 74. Building
73 is at the south end of the tunnel and Building 74 is at the north end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and concrete and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time
of inspection include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning.
Minor problems at this time include corrosion of the utility pipes and conduits.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace lighting conduits and wiring, 315 LF.
2. Replace electric lines, 315 LF.

Page 2 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 59.1 Several damp areas on brick lining.


1. LINING G 402.1,2,3 Moderate to heavy corrosion on steam pipes, water pipes,
2. PORTALS G and electrical conduits. Several light fixtures are
3. FLOOR G damaged.
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM P
2. WATER P
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. TELEPHONE G
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: General view of brick lining, looking south toward Building 73

Photo 4: Looking north toward Building 74; Note damp areas along brick lining

Page 5 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: Looking south from south portal; Note hanging door

Photo 6: General view of stairway at Building 73

Page 6 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 7: General view of stairway at Building 74

Photo 8: General view of utility pipes, looking north

Page 7 of 8
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 73-74
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 9: Corrosion on piping at south portal

Photo 10: Damaged light fixture; Note corrosion on conduit

Page 8 of 8
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT

ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL – WEST CAMPUS


WASHINGTON, D.C.
TUNNEL BETWEEN BUILDINGS 74 & 75

NORTH PORTAL

SOUTH PORTAL

Report Prepared by:


Burgess & Niple, Inc.
4160 Pleasant Valley Road
Chantilly, VA 20151

Inspection Date: 12/14/05


FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

Lining Material Brick Tunnel Height 9.2 FT


Total Length 300 FT Year Constructed 1900 (est.)
Springline Width 8.2 FT Year Reconstructed
Begin Building 74 Entry Through Building 74
End Building 75
Tunnel connects the basement level of Building 74, The Administration Building to the basement level
of Building 75, B Building.

LOCATION MAP

INSPECTION TEAM: T. Suthers, J. Wolfe (Burgess & Niple, Inc.)

Page 1 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This tunnel is 300 feet long by 8.2 feet wide and runs between buildings 74 and 75. Building
74 is at the south end of the tunnel and Building 75 is at the north end. The tunnel lining is
composed of brick and concrete and is in good condition. Utilities within the tunnel at the time
of inspection include water, steam, electric, and telephone; none of which were functioning.
Minor problems at this time include corrosion of the water pipes and lighting conduits and
downed electrical lines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Critical Repairs:
None.

Priority Repairs:
None.

Routine Repairs:
1. Replace lighting conduit and wiring, 300 LF.

Page 2 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
CONDITION RATING CODES
N NOT APPLICABLE 2 CRITICAL CONDITION – advanced deterioration
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION of primary structural elements. Failure cracks in
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION – no problems steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or
noted. scour may have removed substructure support.
7 GOOD CONDITION – some minor problems. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION – structural close the structure until corrective action can be
elements show some minor deterioration. taken.
5 FAIR CONDITION – all primary structural 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION – major
elements are sound but may have minor section deterioration or section loss present in critical
loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. structural components or obvious vertical or
4 POOR CONDITION – advanced section loss, horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
deterioration, spalling, or scour. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action
3 SERIOUS CONDITION – loss of section, may return structure to light service.
deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously 0 FAILED CONDITION – out of service; beyond
affected primary structural components. Local corrective action.
failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or
shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS


G = GOOD (CODES 7 – 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 – 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 – 4)

59. TUNNEL 7 402.2 Minor corrosion of water pipes.


1. LINING G 402.3 Lighting conduits have minor to moderate corrosion and are
2. PORTALS G hanging and laying on floor in areas.
3. FLOOR G
4. DRAINS & DRAINAGE G
5. VENTILATION G
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

401. ACCESS ROOM N


1. WALL N
2. CEILING N
3. FLOOR N
4. STAIRWAY N
5. OTHER N
6. OTHER N
7. OTHER N

402. UTILITIES 4
1. STEAM G
2. WATER F
3. ELECTRICAL P
4. GAS N
5. FIBER OPTIC N
6. TELEPHONE G
7. OTHER N
8. OTHER N

Page 3 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05
PHOTOS

Photo 1: North portal

Photo 2: South portal

Page 4 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 3: Looking south toward Building 74; Note corrosion on pipes

Photo 4: Looking north toward Building 75; Note corrosion on pipes

Page 5 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 5: Looking north toward Building 75; Note corrosion on pipes

Photo 6: General view of doorway at Building 75

Page 6 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 7: General view of stairway at Building 74

Photo 8: General view of brick lining

Page 7 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 9: General view of brick lining at south portal

Photo 10: Looking south toward Building 74; Note downed lighting conduit
and reduced vertical clearance due to pipes

Page 8 of 9
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 74-75
INSPECTION DATE: 12/14/05

Photo 11: Downed light and conduit

Photo 12: Damaged light fixture

Page 9 of 9

Anda mungkin juga menyukai