Prepared for:
Dr. Nurul Sakina Binti Mokhtar Azizi
Prepared by:
Nur Millatina Binti Ridzuan (127197)
Nur Syahirah Binti Ali (128126)
Farah Anis Binti Asrudin (128026)
Nur Izny Binti Muhamad Fisol (135384)
Submission Date
13rd April 2018
Table of Content
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Risk Categorise
2.1 Environmental Risk
2.1.1 Risk of Land Degradation
2.1.2 Risk of Water Pollution
2.1.3 Risk to Flora and Fauna
2.1.4 Risk of Air Pollution
2.1.5 Risk from Noise and Vibration
2.2 Management Risk
2.2.1 Executive Risk
2.2.2 Project Management Risk
2.2.3 Schedule Risk
2.3 Design Risk
2.3.1 Infeasible
2.3.2 Lacks Flexibility
2.3.3 Fails Peer Review
2.3.4 Not Fit For Purpose
2.3.5 Fails to Pass Governance Processes
2.4 Safety and Health Risk
2.4.1 Working at height
2.4.2 Moving objects
2.4.3 Slips, trips and falls
2.4.4 Noise
2.4.5 Hand arm vibration syndrome
2.4.6 Collapse
2.4.7 Air Borne
2.4.8 Electricity
3.0 References
1.0 Introduction
All projects encounter risks. If a potential risk of the project is not identified early,
then the project will be at a high risk to complete as per schedule, within budget and to meet
the expected quality. Managing risks in construction projects has been recognised as a very
significant management process in order to achieve the project objectives in terms of time,
cost, quality, safety and environmental sustainability.
A key executive leaves the company, the resulting disruption becomes a project issue.
A change in management is needed, thus information and data need to be clearly
defined again to the new recruit to avoid miscommunication.
The project team fails to get authority approval to proceed with projects. Project will
not initiate based on the planned timeline unless it receives confirmation from
authority.
In the early stage, the Work Programme has been developed for activities
management. As the work on site starts, the priority on activities start shifting thus,
amendment on sequence of activities has to keep on record. Any disruption on
activities will affect the flow of the project.
2. Project key success criteria not clearly defined to verify the successful completion of
each project phase.
Project Manager has not clearly explained the key criteria of activities to project team
which may lead to priority is not placed on the important activities.
3. Projects within the program often need the same resources at the same time
Some activities rely on other activities for supply of resources. Any inadequate supply
of resources will affect the performance of the activities.
The period of construction is shorten than planned to start marketing demo, trade
show, or other mandate with little consideration of project team estimates.
Schedule is not realistic, only cater for the "best case". Next, some important task are
missing from the schedule. The project team only realises the mistake during
construction. This may lead to cost overrun and schedule overrun. There is also a case
in which a delay in one task causes cascading delays in dependent tasks. If a
professional lacking of experience develops the plan of work, he may not recognized
unfamiliar areas which take more time than expected to design and implement.
2.3 Design Risk
It is difficult to pass government strict policies and regulation maybe in terms of plan
of their architectural or technology processes It is especially when the project
involved is to construct hospital, school, and other infrastructure that require certain
approval and specification as that kind of building should have great protection from
germs, fire and so on.
The designer can be wild sometimes, their ideas can be unacceptable to be build in
reality even it is excessively costly to be build. The design should support the
requirements and the main function of the building. It can be infeasible if the design
does not comply with the constraint functions and it can be infeasible for an entire
design space or region of interest.
Designer should provide the best quality of design as a poor design will require a lot
of changes request and its difficult to be done as it can be very costly. A visual design
should not has a confusing and unattractive layout as it can increase the possibility to
face client rejection. It is also proven that there is a correlation between design
changes and cost as a study conducted by Cox et al. (1999) revealed in their research
that design changes often have a major impact on the client objectives in construction
projects where the cost associated with post contract award design changes typically
amount about 5% to 8% of the contract value
The feasibility study should be precisely and accurately be done. The project purpose
need to fit the purpose and the priority of project needs can be identified to avoid low
quality design produced by designers as it will require design changes in the future
and will affect the quality, time and cost of the project.
2.3.5 Design fails peer review
It is important to have peers and architectural experts to review the design produced to
make sure opinion and recommendation can be made by them before any ideas been
finalised. The reviews will reveal the level of project review to be carried out and
report what will be undertaken by the project team. Describe how plans and
specifications will be reviewed, at what stages (for example 33%, 66%, 99%), and
members of the design review team.
2.4 Safety and Health Risk
The construction industry accident fatality rate positions at twice that of other sectors.
Construction sites are therefore challenging places from a health and safety angle and almost
every possible hazard exists within this constantly changing working environment.
2.4.4 Noise
Noise is a major hazard on site. Excessive noise causes over a period can cause long term
hearing problems and can be a dangerous interruption, the cause of accidents.
2.4.8 Electricity
The most average workers electrocuted in construction industry are during refurbishment
work on commercial and domestic buildings. Besides that, people that conduct working
near overhead power lines and cables more expose to risk.
References
J. Yap, H.A. Rahman, W.Chen. (2015). Impacts of Design Changes on Construction Project
Performance : Insights from a Literature Review. 14th Management in Construction
Research Association (MiCRA 2015) Conference and Annual Meeting, Kuala Lumpur.
Norulaini, N., Ab, N., & Esa, N. (2014). Sustainable Living with Environmental Risks,
Managing Construction Development Risk to the Environment, 193-196.
William, Terry. (1995). The Effect of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs. Journal
of The Operational Research Society, Volume 46 (Issue 7)
Rawi, R. M. (n.d.) Project Risk Identification For New Project Manager. Retrieved 12 April
2018, available from https://www.projecttimes.com/articles/project-risk-identification-
for-new-project-manager.html