Past
But the past ability to perform a particular action on one occasion is expressed with was/were
able to:
Although the current was strong, I was able to swim to the other bank. (I managed to swim
to the other bank)
In the sentence above could is not possible. However, this rule is relaxed in the negative and
with verbs of the senses:
Be able to is used to express past ability when could is grammatically not possible:
Will and should + infinitive are used to express assumptions with reference to present and
future time. Assumptions with will are more probable:
Past
Will, should and ought to + perfect infinitive are used to express assumptions about past
events:
Can, could, might and should/shouldn't + infinitive are used to express criticism or
disapproval with reference to present or future time:
Past
Could, might and should/shouldn't + perfect infinitive are used to express criticism or
disapproval with reference to past time:
Present
Must, can't and couldn't + infinitive are used to express deductions about present events:
That child is really talented. His parents must be proud of him.
It's only 10 o'clock. He can't/couldn't be at home.
Past
Must, can't and couldn't + perfect infinitive are used to express deductions about past events:
Present
Tom would do something like that, wouldn't he? It's so typical of him!
Will is used to emphasise the characteristics of a person rather than describing the person
himself or herself:
A friend will always help you. (this is one of the characteristics of a friend)
Past
USED TO
Used to refers to past habits and states which were true in the past but are not true any more. It
can be used with both action verbs and state verbs:
Used to + infinitive should not be confused with be/get used to + gerund (verb-ing):
She used to live alone in a small apartment. (it was true in the past, but not any more)
She was used to living alone in a small apartment. (she was accustomed to it)
She got used to living alone in a small apartment. (she became accustomed to it)
WOULD
Would describes repeated past actions but not states. It can only be used with action verbs:
From time to time, he would call her to ask if she wanted to meet for lunch.
USED TO or WOULD?
With action verbs, often either used to or would is possible:
Be going to is used to express future intentions that, at the moment of speaking, have already
been decided:
The future simple tense is used to express future intentions that are decided at the time of
speaking (spontaneous offers, promises and decisions):
In the first person, shall can be used instead of will to announce intentions. Shall is more
formal than will:
Must refers to obligations which come from the speaker and may be directed at the speaker or
the listener:
Have to expresses external obligations, which come from outside of the speaker. These may
be rules and regulations imposed by an external authority:
Absence of obligation is expressed with the negative form of have to, not with mustn't.
Mustn't is used to express that it is necessary not to do something:
I don't have to get up early tomorrow. It's a holiday. (I can get up late.)
You mustn't tell anyone. It's a secret. (Don't tell anyone.)
Have got to has the same meaning as have to, but it is more common in informal, spoken
language. The affirmative, negative and interrogative forms of have to and have got to are:
Past
Must has no past form. Instead, we use had to to express past obligations:
Need as a modal verb also occurs in interrogative sentences, but this use is much more
formal:
Past
The past tense of the main verb need to is needed to:
The negative form didn't need + to-infinitive normally refers to actions which were
unnecessary and were not performed:
We didn't need to buy any milk. We had plenty at home. (we didn't have to buy any
milk, and we didn't buy any)
Need as a modal does not have a past tense form. Needn't + perfect bare infinitive
(have + past participle), however, is used for actions which were performed but were
unnecessary:
We needn't have bought any milk. We still have plenty at home. (we bought some
milk, but it wasn't necessary)
Should and ought to + infinitive express obligation and duty. Should is used when we offer a
subjective opinion, while ought to has a more general and more objective meaning:
Past
Should and ought to + perfect infinitive express that an action which was desirable was not
performed:
Shall is used to express formal rules and regulations or commands in an archaic style:
Can and may are used to give permission. May is more formal and less common in everyday
contexts:
The negative forms cannot/can't, mustn't and may not (more formal) are used to express
prohibitions:
Can, could and may are used to ask for permission. Can is the most direct of the three, could
is more formal and tentative, and may is the most formal:
Might, which has a more tentative meaning, is very formal and is rarely used:
When we talk about permission but we are not actually giving, refusing or asking for it, we
can use can/can't or be allowed to:
But when we talk about a particular action which was permitted and performed, we use
was/were allowed to:
May and might + infinitive are used to express present or future possibility. May expresses a
greater degree of certainty:
You should ask him. He may/might know Susan's telephone number. (Perhaps he knows her
number.)
I may/might see you later. (Perhaps I will see you later.)
You should introduce yourself; he may/might not remember you. (Perhaps she doesn't/won't
remember you.)
May and might are usually not used to introduce a question. Instead, we can use Do you
think? or be likely to/that:
Could can be used instead of may and might with the verb be:
The food is delicious, and the staff couldn't be more polite. (they are very polite)
Except for this use, couldn't expresses negative deduction, not possibility:
It's only 10 o'clock. He couldn't be at home. (He is usually at work at this time of the day.)
Past
May, might and could + perfect infinitive express uncertainty with reference to past actions:
We haven't heard from him for ten years. He may/might/could have died. (Perhaps he has
died, but we don't know.)
But when we want to say that something was possible but did not happen, we use might or
could:
He was very careless when crossing the road. He might/could have died. (He didn't die.)
I could have caught the bus if I had hurried. (I didn't hurry, so I didn't catch the bus.)
It was a great year, and I couldn't have been happier. (I was very happy)
May/might not + perfect infinitive is used for uncertainty, but could not + perfect infinitive
(except for the case above) expresses deduction:
I had better call Anne. She may/might not have read my e-mail. (uncertainty)
It couldn't have been John you saw this morning. He is away on holiday. (deduction)
Be going to is used to predict future events that are very near (and can be seen) or seem sure
to happen. Such predictions are based on present evidence:
The future simple is used to make predictions that are based on personal judgement, opinion
or intuition, and not on present evidence. Whether or not the event will happen is not certain.
Such predictions are often introduced by I think / I don't think:
In the first person, shall can be used instead of will in formal styles:
The future simple is also used to make general predictions about facts that are always true or
events that always happen:
May/might as well is often used in everyday conversation to suggest something when you
can't think of anything better to do:
Present
Past
I took the phone back to the shop, but they wouldn't give me a replacement.
Try as I might, the door wouldn't open.