Being a great leader is more than just power and decision making. To be a great leader
we must know our where our strengths and weaknesses are and how to use them to the highest
capability. It is about the process of influencing those around us to better our team and
organization. It is learning how to use your strengths and how to manage your weaknesses to be
a great leader (Santovec, 2012). There are many different approaches to placing value on traits
and skills in leadership. In this paper I will discuss the two techniques I used to determine my
Many different tools are used for assessing leadership traits in organizations to determine
how and where individuals may provide the best service. One of the many tools available, the
Leadership Trait Questionnaire (LTQ), uses an individual’s own perceptions, as well as,
followers’ perceptions, to determine where their strengths and weaknesses measure on the trait
approach scale (Northouse, 2019). I completed the LTQ available in Peter Northouse’s textbook,
Leadership: Theory and Practice (2019), and asked five peers to complete one on me for
comparison. This questionnaire gives the opportunity to compare how you view your traits
compared to how your peers or followers view them. The results of my LTQ are listed below.
Self Peers
1. 5 3.7
2. 4 4.7
3. 5 4.7
4. 4 3.7
5. 3 4
6. 5 3.7
7. 5 5
8. 5 4.7
9. 4 4.3
LEADERSHIP INSTRUMENT Solomon 3
10. 5 4.7
11. 4 2.3
12. 5 5
13. 5 4
14. 5 4.3
While the LTQ is helpful in determining where an individual can be most beneficial to
an organization based off their current traits, a skills inventory questionnaire is useful in
understanding where an individual’s strengths and weaknesses are in regards to their leadership
skills. The difference in the two is the results from the LTQ can only validate how an individual
can be of best service based off only the traits they already possess and the skills inventory
weaknesses and focus on strengths. I completed the skills inventory available in Northouse’s
Score
1. 3
2. 5
3. 4
4. 2
5. 3
6. 5
7. 4
8. 4
9. 5
10. 3
11. 4
12. 5
13. 4
14. 4
15. 4
16. 5
17. 5
18. 5
Technical Skill 21
Human Skill 25
Conceptual Skill 28
LEADERSHIP INSTRUMENT Solomon 4
Scoring Interpretation:
The findings from the trait’s questionnaire was very eye-opening. I found that I rated
myself higher on 9 out of 14 questions and only rated myself lower on 3 of the 14 questions. This
implies a strength and weakness I believe. It’s a strength because it shows I have a high level of
self-confidence in my abilities as a leader, however, the weakness shows in the concept that I
may not realize where my actual weaknesses lie. It is crucial to be able to determine where an
individual's own weaknesses are as well as their strengths. A great leader should be able to focus
Findings from the skills inventory were fairly accurate to what I perceive of my skills
level already. It revealed that my conceptual skills were the highest of the three types of
leadership skills. It also rated my human skills at a high level and my technical skills at the top
end of the moderate level. These results imply that my skills level would allow me to best serve
in top management levels as opposed to middle or supervisory levels. My weakness falls within
technical skills, which supervisory and middle management require a high level for successful
leaders. My strengths of human and conceptual skills are required for successful top management
leaders.
Alternatives
Mary Lou Santovec states in her article, “Team Leaders Use Their Strengths, Manage
Their Weaknesses” (2012), “Great leaders spend time improving what they do best. They’re not
LEADERSHIP INSTRUMENT Solomon 5
interested in becoming well rounded.” This does not mean they are not concerned with
improving and being a great leader but rather that a great leader knows where their strengths are
and how to overcome their weaknesses effectively. One key alternative to improve your team as
a leader, in spite of your weaknesses, is to hire followers who excel in your areas of weakness. It
is important to remember when building your team of followers, to include all different strengths
and skills within the group for the overall success of the team.
Implementation
To build a successful team around me, as a leader, I should look to hire those individuals
who may excel in their technical skills. These individuals would make great lower and middle
level managers to help with the functional management of my team. Some of the traits I ranked
lower in, by myself and my peers, were my persistence and conscientiousness. I find that some
of my weakness lies in not being as organized and being easily distracted from my immediate
goals or tasks. Hiring an individual or individuals that excel in this area can help to organize
Training is a great way to improve leadership skills as opposed to the traits that we
possess (Santovec, 2012). Our traits are something that makes us who we are and knowing those
traits that are stronger in each of us will help in building a great team and organization. While it
is most beneficial to have members of a team and organization that has various trait strengths,
undergoing training to improve our skills and acquiring guidance from those that have higher
References
Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (Eighth ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Santovec, M. L. (2012). Team Leaders Use Their Strengths, Manage Their Weaknesses. Women
in Higher Education,21(12), 27-28. doi:10.1002/whe.10404