A86636-2 Condition 22 - Pressure Test Plan - A5V2R7

Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Order XO-E101-001-2017
Line 10 Westover Segment Replacement Program Condition 22 - Pressure Testing Program
Filed October 6, 2017
Hydrostatic Test Report
CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014
Westover Segment Replacement (Line 10)
DETAILED DESIGN - PIPELINE
Prepared for:
Enbridge Pipelines Inc.
Edmonton, AB
AFE Number: 1442022A90

Document Number: 680046-PL-RPT-0014
CH2M Project Number: 680046
Issued For Revision Date By Checked Approved Client Notes
Review A Dec 13, 2016 ATK DP/NA CS
Construction 0 April 12, 2017 DP CW/NA CS
Construction 1 July 13, 2017 DP NA CS c/l v3.2
Construction 2 Oct 3, 2017 NA CS CS
PAGE 1 OF 12
© 2017 CH2M HILL ALWAYS REFER TO CH2M HILL VO SITE FOR CURRENT VERSION
Page 1 of 20
Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Order XO-E101-001-2017
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3
2. Design Philosophy .................................................................................................................... 3
3. Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 3
4. Design Input / Basis .................................................................................................................. 4
5. Testing Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 6
5.1 Mainline...................................................................................................................................6
5.2 Horizontal Direction Drill (HDD) Segment Pre-Test ................................................................6
5.3 Mainline Fabricated Assemblies .............................................................................................7
5.4 Station Piping ..........................................................................................................................8
5.5 Mainline Concrete Coated Sections ........................................................................................8
6. Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Plan Development ........................................................................ 8
6.1 Mainline Hydrostatic Test Contractor Requirements .............................................................8
6.2 Installation Strategy and Test Section Selection .....................................................................8
6.3 Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Pressure Calculations ...............................................................8
6.4 Hydrostatic Test Heads ...........................................................................................................9
6.5 Valve Section Pipe, Final Tie-in Pipe and Security Pipe ...........................................................9
6.6 Test Media Sourcing and Disposal ..........................................................................................9
6.6.1 Mainline Test Water................................................................................................ 10
6.6.2 Pre-Test Water ........................................................................................................ 10
7. Hydrostatic Test Acceptance and Documentation .................................................................... 10
8. Post-Hydrostatic Test Activities ............................................................................................... 10
8.1 De-Watering ......................................................................................................................... 10
8.2 Drying ................................................................................................................................... 11
8.3 Corrosion Inhibitor/Biocide .................................................................................................. 11
9. Safety and Protection of Property and the Environment .......................................................... 11
Appendixes ........................................................................................................................................ 12
Appendix 1 – V3.2 Westover Segment Replacement Pipeline Hydrotest Schematics ..................... 12
Appendix 2 – 680046-PL-CAL-0008 Hydrostatic Test Calculations ................................................... 12
PAGE 2 OF 12
Page 2 of 20
1. Introduction
Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (Enbridge) is currently undertaking detailed design activities on the Westover
Segment Replacement Project (the Project). The Project includes 35 km of NPS 20 pipeline for the
transport of low vapour pressure (LVP) product between Enbridge’s existing Westover Terminal and
Nanticoke Junction. The Project also includes the installation of four mainline block valve (MLBV) sites.
This report describes the Project’s hydrostatic testing plan. This report establishes Intended Maximum
Operating Pressure (Intended MOP) and associated qualifications pressures along the length of the
pipeline in accordance with CSA, NEB, and Enbridge requirements with supporting calculations and a
proposed Hydrostatic Test Diagram. Target test pressures are calculated to ensure the Project receives
regulatory approval to operate at the Intended MOP. Test media sources, filling, dewatering, and disposal
locations are also discussed.
2. Design Philosophy
The following standards, specifications, and reports were used in designing the hydrostatic testing plan for
the Project:
• CSA-Z662-15, Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems;

• Enbridge Construction Specification PCS-005 (2015), Pipeline Hydrostatic Testing;
• Enbridge Construction Specification FCS-014 (2016), Pressure Testing – Facility Piping;
• Enbridge Engineering Standard D06-101 (2015), Piping Design and Construction Mainline;
• Enbridge Engineering Standard D06-103 (2016), Crossing Design, Mainline;
• Technical Specification Deviation Record TSDR-127 (2017), MLBV assemblies test pressure
• National Energy Board Act, Current to October 26, 2016;
• National Energy Board Onshore Pipeline Regulations, Current to October 26, 2016; and
• Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Fisheries Act, Current to October 26, 2016.
3. Definitions
A brief review of terminology used in this report is provided below for clarity.
Qualification Pressure (QP): As defined in CSA Z662-15, Section 8.7.6.4, in reference to the point specific
profile, the minimum pressure achieved over the duration of the strength test at each point in the test
section.
Maximum Operating Pressure (MOP): As defined in CSA Z662-15, the maximum pressure at which the
pipe is qualified to be operated, established through hydrostatic testing as the lesser of the qualification
pressure divided by 1.25 and the Design Pressure.
PAGE 3 OF 12
Page 3 of 20
Design Pressure / Intended MOP: As defined within CSA Z662-15, Section 4.2.1.1. The pressure which
Enbridge intends to submit for regulatory licensing as the MOP for a segment of pipeline. For the Project,
the Intended MOP is a point specific pressure along the pipeline route set by a discharge pressure of 9,930
kPa at Westover Terminal.
Theoretical Design Pressure: The limiting pressure for a segment of pipeline as calculated according to
CSA Z662-15, Section 4.3.5.1 to which that segment can be operated. Note that the Design Pressure can be
set to be less than the Theoretical Design Pressure by the designer.
Maximum Test Pressure: The upper limit on the test pressure range for a segment of pipeline, established
to safely set the boundary on stress imposed on the pipe and limit the potential for damage.
Minimum Test Pressure: The lower limit of the test pressure range for a segment of pipeline, established
to impose sufficient stress on the pipe to adequately prove the integrity of the segment.
Target Test Pressure: The target hydrostatic testing pressures along a test section, within the maximum
and minimum bounds as defined above.
Critical Low Point: The point on a pipe section that will produce the highest hoop stress, taking into
account elevation, diameter, wall thickness, and SMYS of the pipe.
4. Design Input / Basis
This report was developed to establish, for regulatory licensing, the hydrostatic test plan for the Project
pipeline in consideration of the Project design parameters and applicable specifications and standards. The
input parameters for this report are listed below in Table 1.
Table 1: Input Parameters for the Hydrostatic Testing Report

Variable Value Data Source Other/Comments
Outside Diameter of Pipe (mm) 508 Design Basis
Memorandum
Pipe Grade (MPa) 483 Design Basis
Memorandum
Design Temperature (°C) 65 Design Basis
Memorandum
Minimum Restraint Temperature -5 Design Basis
(°C) Memorandum
Discharge Pressure at Westover 9,930 Design Basis
Terminal (kPa) Memorandum
Design Factor, F 0.8 Clause 4.3.6, CSA Z662‐15
PAGE 4 OF 12
Page 4 of 20
Variable Value Data Source Other/Comments

Location Factor, L 1.0 Clause 4.3.7, CSA Z662‐15 Product is LVP
(Table 4.2)
Joint Factor, J 1.0 Clause 4.3.8, CSA Z662‐15 ERW pipe
(Table 4.3)
Temperature Factor, T 1.0 Clause 4.3.9, CSA Z662‐15 Design temperature is less than
(Table 4.4) 120°C
Mainline Pipe Wall Thickness (WT) 7.23 Wall Thickness Design Mainline Pipe WT to be used in
(mm) Report all mainline calculations for
most conservative results.
HDD and Valve Assembly Heavy 11.13 Wall Thickness Design
Wall Pipe WT (mm) Report
Elevation Profile - Version 3.2 Centerline
Profile
Flange Rating PN150 Design Basis Tie-in spool at Nanticoke
Memorandum Junction is PN100
Density of Test Media (kg/m3) 1000 Density of water
Minimum Strength Test % SMYS 100% SMYS PCS-005 – 10.1.2/10.1.3
(at highest point in test section)
Target Strength Test % SMYS 107% SMYS PCS-005 – 10.1.2/10.1.3
(at critical low point in test section)
Maximum Strength Test % SMYS 110% SMYS Clause 8.7.4.2, CSA Z662-
15
Enbridge provided CH2M with the elevation profile for Version 3.2 of the Project centerline. The profile
was used to develop a zero flow Intended MOP profile based on changes in elevation along the route,
using a discharge pressure of 9,930 kPa at Westover Terminal and a conservative fluid density of 1000
kg/m3. This scenario was chosen to ensure all points in the pipeline were qualified to a pressure greater
than they would experience in the highest pressure scenario, which is a full lock-in scenario.
The Intended MOP profile and the pipeline parameters were then used to calculate Minimum, Maximum,
and Target Test Pressures for each test section, based on ensuring the hydrostatic test achieved
qualification pressures high enough for the Project to meet regulatory requirements for approval to
operate at the Intended MOP and to meet the requirements of CSA Z662-15.
The following sections discuss the Project specific details and requirements for this report.
PAGE 5 OF 12
Page 5 of 20
5. Testing Criteria
5.1 Mainline
The mainline hydrostatic strength and leak tests shall meet the requirements of CSA Z662-15, Enbridge
Specification PCS-005, and all other documents referenced in Section 2. Where conflicts exist between
documents, the more stringent requirement shall take precedence. A summary of the testing criteria for a
mainline test section is shown below in Table 2.
Table 2: PCS-005 Mainline Testing Criteria

Strength Test Leak Test
Minimum Test Maximum Test Minimum Minimum Test Maximum Test Minimum
Pressure Pressure Duration Pressure Pressure Duration
Lesser of: Lesser of: 4.25 hrs 110% of the Lesser of the 4.25 hrs
• Pressure • Pressure Intended MOP qualification
corresponding corresponding at the highest pressure and
to a pipe to a pipe point the pressure
stress of stress of 110% corresponding
100% SMYS SMYS to 100% SMYS
• 150% of the • Pressure that
rating of any produces a
valve or deviation of
flange 0.2% from
• 125% of the straight line
intended proportionality
MOP at the on a pressure-
highest point volume (PV)
plot
• 156% of the
lowest rating
of any valve
or flange
Target Test Pressures for the project are selected between Minimum and Maximum Test Pressures to give
an upper and lower test window in the field.
The V3.2 mainline testing requirements are provided for the Contractor on the Pipeline Hydrotest
Schematic drawings provided with the Pipeline Construction package.
5.2 Horizontal Direction Drill (HDD) Segment Pre-Test
The drag sections for the Project’s two HDDs will be hydrostatically pre-tested above-ground as required
by Enbridge Standard D06-103. The pre-test shall be conducted as follows:
PAGE 6 OF 12
Page 6 of 20
a. The decision has been made to set the Minimum Strength Test Pressure for the pre-test to the
Maximum Test Pressure the pipe will experience during the mainline test for the corresponding
mainline test section. The Minimum Strength Test pressure for the pre-test shall correspond to
110% SMYS of the mainline pipe (maximum mainline test pressure), plus the maximum static head
between the critical low point and the HDD low points. The Maximum Strength Test pressure for the
pre-test shall correspond to 80% SMYS of the HDD pipe, for safety of site personnel.
b. Care must be taken to adequately support and restrain the pipe during the test to ensure it is not
strained beyond acceptable limits.
c. The pipe will be fully exposed, therefore the strength test duration shall be a minimum of one hour.
d. Following the strength test, a visual leak test shall be performed to verify there are no leaks.
e. The pre-test shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of CSA Z662-15 and PCS-005.
A summary of the HDD details is shown below in Table 3.
Table 3: HDD Pre-Test Details

Minimum Pre-test Maximum Pre-test Section
Location
HDD Name Strength Pressure Strength Pressure Length (m)
(KP)
(kPa) * (kPa) *
Westover 0+233 15,200 16,900 701.84
Copetown Woods 8+091 15,200 16,900 870.20
* Pressures Rounded to nearest 100 kPa
The HDD pre-testing requirements are provided for the Contractor on the HDD Construction Notes
drawings provided with the Pipeline Construction package.
5.3 Mainline Fabricated Assemblies
Mainline fabricated assemblies such as MLBV and the sending trap assemblies will be tested in the shop.
Assemblies shall not be tested with the mainline test and shall be cut-in to the line after drying is
complete.
Test pressures shall comply with the requirements of CSA Z662-15, Enbridge Specifications FCS-014, and
TSDR-127-2017.
The Maximum Test Pressure shall be limited to a pressure corresponding to 80% SMYS of the 11.13 mm
heavy wall pipe for personnel safety during the shop test. The Target Test Pressure shall be the Minimum
Test Pressure plus a 500 kPa buffer with the exception of the PN100 tie-in spool at Nanticoke which will be
tested in accordance with the test pressure requirements for a PN100 assembly.
The shop testing requirements are provided for the Fabricator on the Piping Isometric drawings provided
with the MLBV Fabrication package, and Barrel and Westover General fabrication packages.
PAGE 7 OF 12
Page 7 of 20
Hydrotest records for the Mainline fabricated assemblies form a part of the final hydrotest documentation
for the Project.
5.4 Station Piping
All station piping shall be hydrostatically tested the requirements per Enbridge Specification FCS-014 by
the facility’s piping contractor.
The testing requirements are provided for the Contractor on the Piping Isometric drawings provided with
the Westover General package.
5.5 Mainline Concrete Coated Sections
If any sections of pipe are coated with continuous concrete coating (CCC), they shall be pre-tested prior to
installation; however, at this time, the Project has no sections with CCC.
6. Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Plan Development
6.1 Mainline Hydrostatic Test Contractor Requirements
The hydrostatic test contractor shall prepare a detailed hydrostatic test plan in accordance with this
document, CSA Z662-15, PCS-005 and the EPP, using the as-built profile for reference, for approval by
Enbridge prior to testing.
6.2 Installation Strategy and Test Section Selection
The Project will be constructed in one spread from Westover Terminal to Nanticoke Junction. The water
source location requires the pipeline to be tested in two test sections with the test break at KP 19+200.
The Project’s MLBV assemblies will be cut-in after the pressure test is complete and therefore do not
affect the test section selection.
6.3 Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Pressure Calculations
The point specific Intended MOP was established along the pipeline utilizing the Version 3.2 elevation
profile and a discharge pressure of 9,930 kPa at the Westover Terminal (KP 0+000). The low-point
intended MOP for the pipeline is 10, 383 kPa south of Book Rd West (~KP 20+029); refer to the hydrotest
schematics in the appendix for site specific intended MOP profile.
In addition to the requirements detailed in section 5.1 the following project decisions by Enbridge are
applied to the mainline test pressure selection: the Minimum Strength Test Pressure shall be the pressure
corresponding to 100% SMYS at the high point in the test section; the Target Strength Test Pressure shall
be the pressure corresponding to 107% SMYS at the critical low point in the test section.
PAGE 8 OF 12
Page 8 of 20
Using the elevation profile, point-specific Minimum, Maximum, and Target Strength Test Pressures along
each test section were set. Point-specific checks were then carried out to ensure the point-specific
minimum test pressure was greater than 125% of the Intended MOP. This confirmed the strength tests will
serve to set a Qualification Pressure that will establish a satisfactory point specific MOP.
The maximum leak test pressure at the critical low point of the test section is set at the lesser of a pressure
corresponding to 100% SMYS and the qualification Pressure. The Target Leak Test Pressure is set at 110%
of the intended MOP (Minimum Leak Test Pressure) at the high point of the test section plus a 250 kPa
buffer. Point specific Target Leak Test Pressures are then established according to the elevation profile.
Test section details are as shown on the Pipeline Hydrotest Schematic drawings provided in Appendix 1.
Refer to calculation sheet PL-CAL-0008 provided in Appendix 2 for detailed calculations of all pressures.
6.4 Hydrostatic Test Heads
The Project will require at least four test heads to complete the hydrostatic test plan as detailed in this
document. In accordance with CSA Z662-15, all components of the test head assemblies must have a
pressure rating such that at the expected test pressures for the maximum hoop stress does not exceed
75% SMYS of any component. Test heads shall be installed with at least one joint (4 m minimum) of 11.13
mm heavy wall pipe between the test head and the mainline pipe to result in a hoop stress of no more
than 90% SMYS of the exposed pipe during testing.
6.5 Valve Section Pipe, Final Tie-in Pipe and Security Pipe
Pipe used for final tie-in sections must be tested in accordance with the Project testing requirements. The
Project is designed with segments of 11.13 mm heavy wall pipe to be installed through the MLBV sites and
tested with the mainline. Tested sections removed at the MLBV sites for MLBV assembly install and cut-
back sections from the pre-tested HDD segments at the tie-ins to the HDDs are sources of tested pipe to
be used for final tie-ins.
The Project includes a requirement for a specified amount of Security Pipe. The Contractor will be
responsible to include sufficient pipe in the mainline tests and HDD pre-tests to provide the required
amount of Security Pipe.
6.6 Test Media Sourcing and Disposal
The test media for all project pressure testing will be fresh water. Additives shall not be used due to
disposal restrictions. Gas testing is not accepted. The hydrostatic test contractor shall determine if
additional equipment is required to establish a stable test temperature.
PAGE 9 OF 12
Page 9 of 20
6.6.1 Mainline Test Water
Water used for the mainline test will be sourced from the City of Hamilton and stored at approximately KP
19+200 in a large portable tank (proposed volume is 79 cubic meters). This will be the location of the
pumps and testing equipment. The test media can be transferred between the test sections and
discharged to the tank from this location. The used test media will be discharged to the city sewer at a
maximum rate of 67L/s per acceptable to the city. Final water source and discharge locations will be
finalized by Enbridge prior to construction activities. City water from Hamilton shall be withdrawn, stored
and disposed of per the water fill and discharge plan in accordance with the permit from the City of
Hamilton.
6.6.2 Pre-Test Water
Water used for the pre-testing of the two HDD drag sections will be taken from the City of Hamilton. The
water for each pre-test will then be transported in a tank truck to the HDD locations. Once pre-testing is
complete, the water will be transported by tank truck and disposed of at an appropriate facility.
7. Hydrostatic Test Acceptance and Documentation
Acceptance criteria for each test will be as described in CSA Z662-15 and Enbridge Specification PCS-005.
Mainline and HDD pre-test hydrostatic test records and documentation in accordance with CSA-Z662-15
must be prepared to provide evidence the piping has been qualified for service and in a manner
satisfactory for submission to the appropriate regulatory body. Documentation shall include calibration
and certification documentation for of instruments used during the hydrostatic test.
The Contractor shall maintain a Pressure-Volume (PV) plot for the pressure tests in accordance with CSA
Z662-15 and PSC-005.
8. Post-Hydrostatic Test Activities

8.1 De-Watering
De-watering shall be completed as soon as possible following the hydrostatic test, in accordance with PCS-
005 Section 15, CSA Z662-15 and all applicable disposal agreements.
When testing of Section 1 is complete, test water will be transferred to Section 2 via a tank stored in
temporary workspace (TWS) at KP 19+200. When testing of Section 2 is complete, the pipeline will be de-
watered and the test water will be disposed of as described above.
PAGE 10 OF 12
Page 10 of 20
8.2 Drying
Once the pipeline is de-watered, it will be dried using foam pigs in accordance with PCS-005 Section 16
and CSA Z662-15. The Contractor shall complete foam pig runs until the Inspector is satisfied that the line
is dry.
8.3 Corrosion Inhibitor/Biocide
Corrosion inhibitor shall be applied to the pipeline in accordance with PCS-005 Section 17, as soon as
possible after drying is complete. The corrosion inhibitor and biocide shall be applied in three steps:
1. De-watering as per Section 8.1 and drying as per Section 8.2.

2. Rinsing the pipeline with a batch inhibitor between two purge pigs
3. Final drying as per PCS-005 Section 16b
For more details on the corrosion inhibitor and biocide application, refer to Enbridge’s Corrosion Inhibitor
and Biocide Scope of Works.
9. Safety and Protection of Property and the Environment
Hydrostatic testing will be done in accordance with the safety requirements as outlined in CSA-Z662-15,
Enbridge construction procedures and safety manuals, and a Project specific hydrostatic testing procedure
to be developed by the Contractor.
Although the test media is water and the majority of the pipeline is Class 1 indicating sparse population,
there is some inherent risk to public safety during hydrostatic testing activities. Adequate signage, patrols,
and barricades will be in place to restrict public access to the ROW in areas close to populated
municipalities and Class 2 and 3 designated areas, as per section 10 in PCS-005.
Adherence to the media sourcing and disposal requirements and regulations set by the government of
Ontario and the City of Hamilton will mitigate environmental risk from hydrostatic testing activities.
Although the test media is water, the Contractor’s hydrostatic testing procedure shall contain a detailed
plan for spill control and cleanup inclusive of remediation.
As per the Construction Alignment Sheets, a joint of heavy-wall pipe shall be installed at the beginning and
end of each test section (including pre-test sections).
The Contractor shall prepare a spill contingency plan to deal with water release in the event of a test
failure. This plan will be in accordance with Enbridge’s Pipeline Environmental Protection Plan (EPP).
PAGE 11 OF 12
Page 11 of 20
Appendixes
Appendix 1 – V3.2 Westover Segment Replacement Pipeline Hydrotest Schematics

Appendix 2 – 680046-PL-CAL-0008 Hydrostatic Test Calculations
PAGE 12 OF 12
Page 12 of 20
Appendix 1 – V3.2 Westover Segment Replacement Pipeline Hydrotest Schematics

• D-10-5.73-HS001-1-400LWP
• D-10-5.73-HS002-1-400LWP
Page 13 of 20

ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC.

10201 JASPER AVENUE
EDMONTON ALBERTA CANADA
Page 14 of 20

ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC.

10201 JASPER AVENUE
EDMONTON ALBERTA CANADA
Page 15 of 20
Appendix 2 – 680046-PL-CAL-0008 Hydrostatic Test Calculations
Page 16 of 20
JOB NO.: 680046

CALCULATION COVER SHEET CALC NO.: PL-CAL-0008
DATE: 7/7/2017
JOB NAME: Line 10 - Westover Segment Replacement Project COMPUTED BY: DP
SUBJECT: Hydro Test Pressure Profile CHECKED BY: NA
DOC. NO. 680046-PL-CAL-0008
REVISION HISTORY:
Rev. No. Date By Approved Notes
A 12/13/16 ATK CS
0 03/21/17 DP CS C/L V3.1
1 07/07/17 DP CS C/L V3.2
OBJECTIVE:
Determine the minimum and maximum strength and leak test pressures at the start, low, high, and end
points of a test section. As well, to determine the target test pressures at those points.
METHOD:
Excel Calculation Sheet based on CSA Z662-15 and Enbridge Specifications
REFERENCES:
CSA Z662-15 Oil and gas pipeline systems
INPUT / ASSUMPTIONS:
Pipe Dia: NPS 20 (508mm), Pipe Cl./Gr.: ERW / X70 (483MPa), Pipe WT: 7.23 mm
Pressures: 9,930 kPa discharge at Westover Station- Centerline Version 3.2
Test medium will be water (1,000 kg/m3 density)
Please refer to calculation sheets for balance of input parameters
RESULTS:
Refer to calculation sheets for test section specific pressures
`
OWNER:
CH2M HILL Energy Canada Ltd. Discipline: PL
680046-PL-CAL-0008.xlsx (C) CH2M HILL 2013

Page 17 of 20
JOB NO.: 680046
CALC NO.: PL-CAL-0008-1
DATE: 7-Jul-17
JOB NAME Line 10 - Westover Segment Replacement Project COMPUTED BY: DP

SUBJECT Hydro Test Pressure Profile CHECKED BY: NA
TEST SECTION 1
TEST SECTION CHARACTERISTICS DESIGN FACTORS

PARAMETER DESCRIPTION PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
Pipeline Name Line 10 OVERALL DESIGN FACTOR 0.8 (FxLxJxT)

Nominal Pipe Size 20 General Design Factor, F 0.8
Nominal Pipe Diameter, D 508 mm Location Factor, L 1
Wall Thickness 7.23 mm Joint Factor, J 1
Material Standard 900 ANSI Temperature Factor, T 1
9930 kPa
Westover Discharge Pressure
TEST FLUID PROPERTIES
SMYS, S 483 MPa PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
Test Section Length 19 km
Aim Pressure Tolerance 250 kPa Test Fluid Water
Test Fluid Density 1000 kg/m3
Location Class 1, 2, 3
Category ( I, II, or III) I
Service LVP
Station Elevation Intended MOP
km m kPa
Section Start 260.412 9,930
Critical Low Point 18.521 215.579 10,370
Critical High Point 0.922 262.522 9,909
Section End 19.195 219.076 10,336
HYDROTEST DESIGN LIMITS
(Section 4.3) - Pressure Design Wall Thickness
2 St
P=
D
OD Section Volume Pressure At Pressure At

OWNER: PIPE SIZE mm m3 100% SMYS kPa 107% SMYS kPa 110% SMYS kPa
NPS 20 508.0 3673 13748 14711 15123
Strength Test Pressure Design - Minimum 4.25 Hours
Profile Data
Elevations Minimum Pressure Maximum Pressure
m kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP
Section Start (Test Point) 260.412 13770 100% 139% 14683 107% 148%
Critical Low Point 215.579 14210 103% 137% 15123 110% 146%
High Point 262.522 13749 100% 139% 14662 107% 148%
Section End 219.076 14176 103% 137% 15088 110% 146%
Target Strength Test Pressure Determination

Elevations lowpoint Target 107%
m kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP
Section Start 260.412 14271 104% 144%
Critical Low Point 215.579 14711 107% 142%
High Point 262.522 14251 104% 144%
Section End 219.076 14677 107% 142%
Leak Test Pressure Design - Minimum 4.25 Hours
Profile Data
m kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP
Section Start (Test Point) 260.412 10921 79% 110% 13308 97% 134%
High Point 262.522 10900 79% 110% 13287 97% 134%
Section End 219.076 11326 82% 110% 13713 100% 133%
Target Leak Test Pressure Determination

Elevations Tolerance + 250 kPa
m kPa %SMYS %Intended MOP
Section Start (Test Point) 260.412 11171 81% 112%
High Point 262.522 11150 81% 113%
Section End 219.076 11576 84% 112%
Page 18 of 20
JOB NO.: 680046
DATE: 7-Jul-17
JOB NAME Line 10 - Westover Segment Replacement Project COMPUTED BY: DP

SUBJECT Hydro Test Pressure Profile CHECKED BY: NA
TEST SECTION 2
TEST SECTION CHARACTERISTICS DESIGN FACTORS

Pipeline Name Line 10 OVERALL DESIGN FACTOR 0.8 (FxLxJxT)

Nominal Pipe Size 20 General Design Factor, F 0.8
Nominal Pipe Diameter, D 508 mm Location Factor, L 1
Wall Thickness 7.23 mm Joint Factor, J 1
Material Standard 900 ANSI Temperature Factor, T 1
Intended Maximum Operating Pressure 9930 kPa

(MOP), P TEST FLUID PROPERTIES
SMYS, S 483 MPa PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
Test Section Length 16.0 km
Aim Pressure Tolerance 250 kPa Test Fluid Water
Test Fluid Density 1000 kg/m3
Service LVP
Station Elevation ntended MOP
km m kPa
Section Start 19.195 219.08 10,336
Critical Low Point 20.029 214.27 10,383
Critical High Point 32.298 229.54 10,233
Section End 35.150 221.44 10,312
2 St
P=
D
OD Section Volume Pressure At Pressure At

OWNER: PIPE SIZE mm m3 100% SMYS kPa 107% SMYS kPa 110% SMYS kPa
NPS 20 508.0 3053 13748 14711 15123
Strength Test Pressure Design - Minimum 4.25 Hours
Profile Data
m kPa %SMYS %MOP kPa %SMYS %MOP
Section Start (Test P 219.076 13852 101% 134% 15075 110% 146%
High Point 229.535 13749 100% 134% 14973 109% 146%
Section End 221.436 13829 101% 134% 15052 109% 146%
Target Strength Test Pressure Determination

Elevations lowpoint Target 107%
m kPa %SMYS %MOP
Section Start 219.076 14664 107% 142%
High Point 229.535 14562 106% 142%
Section End 221.436 14641 106% 142%
Leak Test Pressure Design - Minimum 4.25 Hours
Profile Data
m kPa %SMYS %MOP kPa %SMYS %MOP
Section Start (Test P 219.076 11359 83% 110% 13700 100% 133%
High Point 229.535 11256 82% 110% 13598 99% 133%
Section End 221.436 11336 82% 110% 13677 99% 133%
Target Leak Test Pressure Determination

Elevations Tolerance + 250 kPa
m kPa %SMYS %MOP
Section Start (Test Point) 219.076 11609 84% 112%
High Point 229.535 11506 84% 112%
Section End 221.436 11586 84% 112%
Page 19 of 20
JOB NO.: 680046
DATE: 7-Jul-17
JOB NAME Line 10 - Westover Segment Replacement Project COMPUTED BY: NA

SUBJECT Hydro Test Pressure Profile CHECKED BY: CS
TEST SECTION HDD Pretest
TEST SECTION CHARACTERISTICS

Pipeline Name Line 10 HDD Low Point (Sheffield Rockton) 236.9 m

Nominal Pipe Size 20 HDD Low point (Copetown) 215.2 m
Nominal Pipe Diameter, D 508 mm Test Section 1 Critical Low 215.6 m
Wall Thickness (line pipe) 7.23 mm Test Section 2 Critical Low 214.3 m
Wall Thickness (HDD pipe) 11.13
Material Standard 900 ANSI
Intended Maximum Operating Pressure 9930 kPa Test Fluid Water

(MOP), P Test Fluid Density 1000 kg/m 3
SMYS, S 483 MPa
Aim Pressure Tolerance 250 kPa
Service LVP
2 St
P=
D
Sheffield HDD - Location: Test

Section 1 Static Head Between Mainline low and HDD
110% SMYS of line pipe Minimum Pre-Test Pressure Maximum Pre-Test Pressure
low
OD Pressure At Elevation Difference Static Head Pressure At

PIPE SIZE mm 110% SMYS* -21 m 0** kPa 110% Pressure + Static Head 80% SMYS***
** Negative static head not additive to
NPS 508.0 15123 kPa 15123 kPa 16932 kPa
minimum test pressure
*Calculated for Line pipe ***Calculated for HDD pipe
Copetown HDD - Location:

Test Section 1 Static Head Between Mainline low and HDD
110% SMYS of line pipe Minimum Pre-Test Pressure Maximum Pre-Test Pressure
low
OD Pressure At Elevation Difference Static Head Pressure At

PIPE SIZE mm 110% SMYS* 0.4 m 3.7 kPa 110% Pressure + Static Head 80% SMYS**
NPS 20 508.0 15123 kPa 15127 kPa 16932 kPa
*Calculated for Line pipe **Calculated for HDD pipe
Page 20 of 20

A86636-2 Condition 22 - Pressure Test Plan - A5V2R7

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

A86636-2 Condition 22 - Pressure Test Plan - A5V2R7

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Enbridge Pipelines Inc.

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Westover Segment Replacement (Line 10)

DETAILED DESIGN - PIPELINE

AFE Number: 1442022A90

Issued For Revision Date By Checked Approved Client Notes

Review A Dec 13, 2016 ATK DP/NA CS

Construction 0 April 12, 2017 DP CW/NA CS

Construction 1 July 13, 2017 DP NA CS c/l v3.2

Construction 2 Oct 3, 2017 NA CS CS

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

• CSA-Z662-15, Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems;

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

4. Design Input / Basis

Table 1: Input Parameters for the Hydrostatic Testing Report

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Variable Value Data Source Other/Comments

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Table 2: PCS-005 Mainline Testing Criteria

5.2 Horizontal Direction Drill (HDD) Segment Pre-Test

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

A summary of the HDD details is shown below in Table 3.

Table 3: HDD Pre-Test Details

5.3 Mainline Fabricated Assemblies

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

5.4 Station Piping

5.5 Mainline Concrete Coated Sections

6. Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Plan Development

6.1 Mainline Hydrostatic Test Contractor Requirements

6.2 Installation Strategy and Test Section Selection

6.3 Mainline Hydrostatic Testing Pressure Calculations

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

6.4 Hydrostatic Test Heads

6.6 Test Media Sourcing and Disposal

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

6.6.1 Mainline Test Water

6.6.2 Pre-Test Water

7. Hydrostatic Test Acceptance and Documentation

8. Post-Hydrostatic Test Activities

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

8.3 Corrosion Inhibitor/Biocide

1. De-watering as per Section 8.1 and drying as per Section 8.2.

9. Safety and Protection of Property and the Environment

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Appendix 1 – V3.2 Westover Segment Replacement Pipeline Hydrotest Schematics

Hydrostatic Test Report

CH2M Project Document No. 680046-PL-RPT-0014

Appendix 1 – V3.2 Westover Segment Replacement Pipeline Hydrotest Schematics

ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC.

ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC.

Hydrostatic Test Report