LTE Throughput Troubleshooting Guidleline

LTE THROUGHPUT TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDELINE
1. How to use this Guideline ........................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Ask yourself and the customer .................................................................................................................................... 3
3. Throughput Considerations ......................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1. Data Rate .................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.2. HARQ based outer-loop ............................................................................................................................. 4
4. Isolation and Troubleshooting ..................................................................................................................................... 4
4.1. Between the Ue and eNodeB: .................................................................................................................... 4
4.2. Between eNodeB and MPG: ....................................................................................................................... 4
5. Basic Health Checks ................................................................................................................................................... 5
6. General Checks outside of the node ........................................................................................................................... 5
6.1. Traceroute from PC attached to Ue to media-server .................................................................................. 5
6.2. CPRI cables ................................................................................................................................................ 5
6.3. Ue and RF conditions ................................................................................................................................. 6
6.4. IP Settings................................................................................................................................................... 6
6.5. General Checks inside eNodeB: ................................................................................................................. 7
6.6.1. Check MAC and RLC Settings: .................................................................................................................. 7
6.6. Case specific trouble shooting and traces in eNodeB ................................................................................ 8
6.6.1. Traces Summary DL: .................................................................................................................................. 8
6.6.2. Trace Validation DL: ................................................................................................................................... 8
6.6.3. Traces Summary UL: .................................................................................................................................. 8
6.6.3.1. Traces to see DTX, TA, RxPower PRB allocation RankIndication (RI) : ............................................... 8
6.6.3.2. Trace UL grant:...................................................................................................................................... 9
6.6.3.3. The trace below shows if there is enough data in the buffer to be scheduled:...................................... 9
6.6.3.4. The trace below shows the reasons for packets discards by eNB: ....................................................... 9
6.6.3.5. RxPower at eNB (too high or too low?): ................................................................................................ 9
6.6.3.6. GINR on DL: ........................................................................................................................................ 10
6.6.3.7. NACKs received from UE: ................................................................................................................... 10
6.6.3.8. UL Scheduler Checks: ......................................................................................................................... 12
6.6.3.9. Other Checks:...................................................................................................................................... 12
6.6.3.9.1. CRC errors detected by UL L1 ....................................................................................................... 12
6.6.3.9.2. The following pmCounters may be used to identify a low data rate from core to eNB: ................. 13
6.6.4. Troubleshooting on MPG (2010B CP04): ................................................................................................. 14
References........................................................................................................................................................................... 15
1. PLM LTE Wiki Page .................................................................................................................................................. 15
2. Vzn LTE-SAE Throughput Troubleshooting: ............................................................................................................. 15
Page 1 4/3/2017
1. How to use this Guideline
Slow
Throughput
issue reported
How Common Yes Isolate and

One Multiple troublshoot
many point of
eNodeB eNodeBs equipment
eNodeBs failure?
No
No Subs All
affected eNodeBs
?
No Subs Is this Yes Engage other

Many or Multiple considered Core Groups
affected
All an Outage?
?
No
Check
eNodeB One
for issues
Implement
troublshooting
Check the
guideline
Ue config
or laptop
Figure 1: Troubleshooting Flow Chart
Page 2 4/3/2017
Ask yourself and the customer

1. Is the issue happening with 1 Ue or multiple Ue’s?
2. If multiple Ue’s is it the same vendor/model/rev of Ue?
3. Is the issue happening at 1 enodeB, several enodeB’s or all enodeB’s? (traceroute from SGW S1-U context to
enodeB S1 interface IP can help determine what network devices are common)
4. What is the observed download/upload speeds and what is expected?
5. How is download/upload speeds determined? (ftp, speed test, other)
6. When was the last time the throughput was observed to be ok?
7. What has changed since the last time throughput was observed to be ok?
8. Does the issue occur during certain times of day (i.e. busy hour)
9. Does the issue occur during certain times of the week (i.e. During local event)
2. Throughput Considerations
The UE estimates SINR (Signal to Interference Noise Ratio) based on the PSD (Power Spectral Density) of the downlink
Reference Signals (RS) and PSD offset between Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) and RS. The SINR is
converted to Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and reported to the RBS in the Channel Feedback Report (CFR). The CQI
indicates the radio quality, and is used by the link adaptation function to select the transport format matching the channel
conditions. This leads to improved radio resource use.
CFRs contain CQI, and Rank Indicator (RI). RI is used only when a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) channel is
present. CFRs are transmitted when the RBS triggers one over the Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) based on
downlink data activity and the age of the earlier received CFR.
The RBS performs an adaptive adjustment of the SINR derived from CQI to compensate for errors and mismatches, and
fulfills the targeted operating point.
Mapping of CQI to MCS (Modulation Coding Schemes) is performed by DL Link Adaptation, Included are guiding tables
as defined in 3GPP (36213-920).
Since UE will report lower CQI values when using MIMO as opposed to SIMO in same RF environment (SINR), UE will
typically use lower Modulation/MCS. This is due to that the UE will take the inter-stream interference into account when
reporting CQI and for SIMO transmission no such interference will exist and the CQI will typically be higher. For example
when the UE is configured in SIMO it will report CQI 15 but when it is configured in MIMO it will report CQI 10.
Note, further fine tuning of MCS’s is performed with HARQ based Outer Loop Link Adaptation (maintain a certain Block
Error Rate).
2.1. Data Rate

The transport format for the transmission, and the required set of PRB (Physical Resource Block) resources out of the
candidate set, are determined based on the channel measurements provided by the UE in CQI reports and the available
number of bits. Link adaptation will use the smallest amount of PRBs that can empty the buffer. If the source (SGW and
northbound all the way up to the server) is not able to keep the DL RLC buffers full, primarily the transmission bandwidth
(number of PRBs) will be decreased and not the MCS.
Most common reason for not keeping up data rates is:
 TCP and UDP configuration in client and server.
 IP configuration in the network, like package size, fragmentation, etc.
 Transport network problems like routing, lack of bandwidth
Page 3 4/3/2017
2.2. HARQ based outer-loop

The HARQ outer-loop will adjust the CQI, based on HARQ ACK and NACK, to Link Adaptation in order to maintain same
BLER after first transmission. For example if UE is reporting to good CQI when running the MIMO this feature will see this
is too many NACK’s which will trigger decrease of CQI. Therefore BLER should be same for SIMO and MIMO. Change
(decreases) is in the Transport Block Size (TBS).
3. Isolation and Troubleshooting

As packets travel from the Ue towards the MPG and there are more than one device in common in the path. Isolation of
the problem can help to quickly find the problematic device. There are several areas where we can observe low
throughput in the EPS network:
1. Between Ue and enodeB
2. Between enodeB MPG
3. Between MPG and Internet
Note: Please note that MME is handling the signaling part of the network and does not have direct contribution to
throughput.
3.1. Between the Ue and enodeB:

This segment of the network is the air interface between the mobile and the enodeB. Various tools can be used at the Ue
to capture the messaging and RF conditions between the Ue and the enodeB. If these tools are not available a good
place to start is with a Wireshark sniffer capture on the laptop connected to the Ue. One of the tools is LLDM with LG
phone. The tool to decode the LLDM logs can be downloaded from:
\\erinas1.lmc.ericsson.se\LMCY\yr\Integration\LTE\MPCS\Mops and Workshops\UE
3.2. Between enodeB and MPG:

This segment of the network is made up of routers and switches and may use third party transport products to carry the
traffic. We can ping and traceroute on the enodeB and MPG to help isolate the devices in this segment. If a sniffer
capture is possible that will also help. A sniffer capture at the enodeB and at the MPG is ideal.
Whether or not a sniffer capture is available, use the steps below to troubleshoot this segment of the network and help
determine the problematic device:
1. Traceroute from the SGW VRF-S1-U context to the enodeB S1 interface IP
2. From the SGW VRF-S1-U context ping the S1 interface IP of the enodeB
3. Check for delay on the ping response.
4. If the delay is large, backup 1 hop in the traceroute list and ping again. Keep doing this until the ping response
time is ok. This will isolate the link that is introducing the delay.
5. Ping with different size packets see how large the packet can be before it fails. The MTU setting in the network
is 1500 so a ping of 1470 should work fine.
6. If a large packet ping does not work, there may be MTU size issues.
7. Determine the maximum size packet that can be used to ping the enodeB S1 interface.
8. From the traceroute list back up 1 hop and see if you can ping with larger size packets.
9. Keep backing up through the network to see where the pings start to succeed, this will isolate the device with
the incorrect MTU setting.
If we perform a packet capture on this network segment below is the list of areas we need to monitor and we should ask
for PCAP format of the packet capture which can be analyzed by Wireshark:
1. At Ue
2. S1/X2 on enodeB
3. S1-U on SGW
4. S5/S8 on SGW
5. Any network device in the path
6. S1-MME on the MME (optional*)
7. S11 on the MME (optional*)
Page 4 4/3/2017
8. S11 on SGW (optional*)

Note: The items marked optional above are signaling interfaces and not directly involved in user payload. It may be
necessary to sniff on these interfaces if there are issues with QOS or other signaling that is not working properly.
4. Basic Health Checks

1. Check MME for alarms
#gsh list_alarms
2. Check SGW for alarms
#show system alarms
3. Check SGW S1 and S5/S8 ports/interfaces/connections for errors or dropped packets
#show port counters detail (from appropriate context)
#show ip interface all-context
4. Check SGW eps control packet counters
#show eps statistics control sgw
5. Check SGW eps traffic packet counters
#show eps statistics traffic sgw
6. Check the SGW to ensure the Ue has the correct bearers and QCI
#show eps ue imsi <IMSI> d
7. Check enodeB for alarms
>ala
8. Check the S1-MME interfaces on the enodeB
>st mme
9. Check enodeB S1 interface for dropped packets
>EtHostMo_getPmCounters -h 1 -t 1
10. Check the MME to ensure the Ue has the correct bearer’s setup with the correct QCI and it matches the SGW.
#gsh get_subscriber -imsi <IMSI> -dl 2
11. Check the mobility logs and isp logs on the MME
# /tmp/DPE_COMMONLOG/isp.log
# /tmp/OMS_LOGS/mobility_event_log/ready/
5. General Checks outside of the node

5.1. Traceroute from PC attached to Ue to media-server
1. Attach Ue
2. Perform a traceroute from PC attached to Ue to media-server, e.g. FTP-server, HTTP-server where throughput
is suspected to be bad:
In a Windows command prompt:
tracert -d 10.74.3.17
3. When media-server is located close to EPC core - Round-Trip-Time is around 30-40 milliseconds.
5.2. CPRI cables

Check that CPRI (Common Public Radio Interface) cables are correctly connected (not crossed between sectors). Effect
of crossing cables can be transmitting of incorrect Physical Cell Identity (PCI). Correct mounting of CPRI cables:
Page 5 4/3/2017
Figure 2 CPRI Connections
5.3. Ue and RF conditions

Requirements for MTU size and TCP Window size settings at laptop
1. MTU size: 1360
2. TCP Window size: 512 Kb
See document “Characteristics Requirements for LTE Backhaul” (5/100 56-HSC 105 50/1 Uen F) in CPI for additional
details.
Optimal RF conditions:
1. RSSI/RSRP: minimum -90 dBm (typical, but SINR is more relevant)
2. SNR: maximum DL 15M (if its MIMO: SINR around 8, For Tx div. around 10); UL 7M (it depends on UL SINR,
but approx around 5db DL)
3. CQI: minimum 7 (minimum required for 16QAM)
4. Rank Information: We need to make sure the terminal is in MIMO (no TXD).
This information can be obtained by having LLDM logs from LG phone under the coverage of the site. The Tool can be
downloaded from this link to decode the LLDM logs:
\\erinas1.lmc.ericsson.se\LMCY\yr\Integration\LTE\MPCS\Mops and Workshops\UE
5.4. IP Settings
1. Are there any limitations on the FTP Server?
2. Receiving Window Settings
3. MTU Size Settings: 1360
Page 6 4/3/2017
5.5. General Checks inside enodeB:

6.6.1. Check MAC and RLC Settings:
O52A7X> get MACConfiguration|DataRadioBearer
111102-11:47:52 172.26.132.57 8.0y ERBS_NODE_MODEL_B_1_53_COMPLETE

stopfile=/tmp/20370
=================================================================================
================================
681
ENodeBFunction=1,RadioBearerTable=default,DataRadioBearer=1
=================================================================================
================================
DataRadioBearerId 1
dlMaxRetxThreshold 8
dlPollPDU 4
headerCompression 0 (NULL)
pelr 1
rlcMode 0 (AM)
tPollRetransmitDl 50
tPollRetransmitUl 50
tReorderingDl 35
tReorderingUl 35
tStatusProhibitDl 25
tStatusProhibitUl 25
ulMaxRetxThreshold 8
ulPollPDU 4
ENodeBFunction=1,RadioBearerTable=default,MACConfiguration=1
=================================================================================
================================
MACConfigurationId 1
dlMaxHARQTx 4
dlPathlossChange 3
tPeriodicBSRTimer 5
tPeriodicPHRTimer 200
tProhibitPHRTimer 200
tTimeAlignmentTimer 5120
ulMaxHARQTx 4
=================================================================================
================================
Total: 2 Mos
In the printout above check

 SignalingRadioBearer
Page 7 4/3/2017
dlMaxRetxThreshold and ulMaxRetxThreshold - Maximum number of RLC re-transmissions in DL

 MACConfiguration
dlMaxHARQTx and ulMaxHARQTx - If set 1 then HARQ disabled.
5.6. Case specific trouble shooting and traces in enodeB

- Are there enough data in the buffer to be scheduled?
- Is data being discarded by eNB?
- What is the received power at eNB?
- What is the GINR (Gain to interface and noise ratio) on the DL?
- Are there a lot of NACK’s received from the UE?
Traces which can be activated to answer above questions:
6.6.1. Traces Summary DL:
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace4 UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER

lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlPdcpPeFt_DISCARD <-- PDCP discards
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlRlcPeFt_DISCARD <-- RLC discards
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlRlcPeFt_RETRANSM
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlL1* <-- Problems on L1, CRC errors, etc
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace1 UpcDlMac* <-- TRAFFIC_ABNORMAL on MAC (scheduler)
mtd peek -ta dlRlcPeBl -si UP_DLRLCPE_FI_STATUS_FOR_DL_TRAFFIC_IND <-- peek on
the RLC status reports DL
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace4 UpcDlMacCeBl_Fl1Trans
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlL1PeFt_DEADLINE_MISSED
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlMacPeFt_DEADLINE_MISSED
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlRlcPeFt_DEADLINE_MISSED
mtd peek -ta ulMacPeBl -signal UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_L1_MEAS2_DL_IND -pe 2 -rep 65535
mtd peek -ta dlMacPeBl -si UP_DLMACPE_CI_DL_UE_CANDIDATES_IND -di 1 -rep 65535
6.6.2. Trace Validation DL:
From a DL UPC perspective, the validatorFO is the software entity that orders the SE's for transmission based on weight.
In a HARQ config, the order would be SI - retx - newtx. The following traces can be used to verify the validatorFO
behaviour/decision making.
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlRrcCPeBl_Ieic
lhsh gcpu01024 te e all UpcDlMacCeFt_UE
lhsh gcpu01024 te e all UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_VALIDATION
6.6.3. Traces Summary UL:

5.6.3.1. Traces to see DTX, TA, RxPower PRB allocation RankIndication (RI) :
lhsh gcpu00256 te e bus_send UpUlL1PeBlMaster_Ieis
lhsh gcpu00256 te e all UpUlPdcpPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00256 te e all UpUlRlcPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00256 te e trace1 UpUlMacPeFt_DEADLINE_MISSED
lhsh gcpu00256 te e trace1 UpUl*
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace5 bus_send trace1 UpcUlMacCeFt_UL_SCHEDULER
mtd peek -ta ulMacCeBl -si UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_UE_ALLOC_IND -di OUTGOING
Page 8 4/3/2017
mtd peek -ta dlMacPeBl -si UP_DLMACPE_CI_UL_HARQ_ALLOC_IND -di 1

mtd peek -ta ulMacCeBl -si UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_MAC_CTRL_INFO_IND -di 3
mtd peek -ta ulMacPeBl -signal UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_L1_MEAS2_UL_IND -pe 2 -rep 65535
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace1 UpcUlMac*
mtd peek -ta dlRlcPeBl -si UP_DLRLCPE_FI_STATUS_FOR_UL_TRAFFIC_IND
5.6.3.2. Trace UL grant:
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace5 trace6 UpcUlMacCeFt_UL_SCHEDULER
5.6.3.3. The trace below shows if there is enough data in the buffer to be scheduled:
Example trace output
1970-01-05 13:51:50.776] 0x5326278f /UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER LEVEL2 cellId=2
subframeNr=8 : Assigned SE PQ: rnti=284 bbUeRef=33554656 PQ(lcid=1
assignableBits=0 minPduSize=56)
[1970-01-05 13:51:50.776] 0x53262806 /UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER LEVEL2 cellId=2
[1970-01-05 13:51:50.776] 0x5326287d /UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER LEVEL2 cellId=2
Note:
lcid=1, lcid=2 are signaling data
lcid=3 is the actual data in the buffer
5.6.3.4. The trace below shows the reasons for packets discards by eNB:
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlRlcPeFt_DISCARD
[1970-01-02 04:12:06.596] 0xe7067317=(bfn:3696, sfn:624, sf:6.87, bf:49)
/UpDlRlcPeFt_DISCARD TRAFFIC_ABNORMAL Received DL_DATA_IND. Free CM 0 bytes is
below threshold 300 bytes. Discarding msg. payloadLength=698 bytes incl GTP-U
header
5.6.3.5. RxPower at eNB (too high or too low?):
lhsh gcpu00256 te e bus_send UpUlL1PeBlMaster_Ieis
Example Trace Output (shows -69.5 dBm):
UpUlMacPeCiUlL1Meas2UlIndS {
sigNo = 430
header {
cellId = 12
sfn = 537
subFrameNo = 9
nrOfPuschReports = 1
nrOfPucchSrReports = 0
totalNrOfReports = 1
reportList[0] {
Page 9 4/3/2017
puschReport {
meas2DlUlReportType = 2
padding0 = 0
bbUeRef = 201326912
isDtx { isDtx = 0, padding0 = 0 }
rxPower { prbListStart = 1, prbListEnd = 4, rxPowerReport = -695, padding0 =

2908, sinr = 1078027011 }
pucchSrReport {
padding0 = 0
bbUeRef = 201326912
5.6.3.6. GINR on DL:

Example Trace Output:
[1970-01-05 13:51:50.772] 0x532445ec /UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER LEVEL2 cellId=2
subframeNr=6 : Assigned SE: rnti=284 seSesDataS(seWeight=15695394 nrOfPqs=5
pqWeight={0 0 0 15695394 0} dciFormat=6 timingAlignmentBits=0 tacOctet=65535
nrofCce=8 startCceIdx=16 dlGinrOuterLoopAdj=SQ8_15(0xfff612f0))
Note: A high negative value for dlGinrOuterLoopAdj means that the outer loop adjustment has reduced the output. This
will lead to SINR used for calculating the MCS to be always 0. A high negative value for dlGinrOuterLoopAdj could be due
to a lot of NACK’s received from the UE on DL transmissions.
5.6.3.7. NACK’s received from UE:

UpUlMacPeCiUlL1Meas2DlIndS {
sigNo = 429
header {
cellId = 12
sfn = 537
subFrameNo = 8
nrOfPucchReports = 1
Page 10 4/3/2017
reportList[0] {
puschReport {
padding0 = 0
bbUeRef = 201326912
dlHarqInfo { dlHarqValid = 1, detectedHarqIndication = 0, dlHarqProcessId =

2, nrOfTb = 2, swapFlag = 0, padding0 = 0 }
timingAdvanceError { timingAdvanceError = 0, padding0 = 0 }
cfrPusch { ElibBbBaseCfrInfoS cfrInfo { ri = 7, cfrLength = 118, cfrFormat =

1, cfrValid = 0, cfrExpected = 1, cfrCrcFlag = 0, padding0 = 0 }, cfr[] = [0, 0,
0, 0] as hex: [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00] }
pucchReport {
padding0 = 0
bbUeRef = 201326912
dlHarqInfo { dlHarqValid = 1, detectedHarqIndication = 0, dlHarqProcessId =

2, nrOfTb = 2, swapFlag = 0, padding0 = 0 }
rxPower { prbListStart = 0, prbListEnd = 0, rxPowerReport = -630, padding0 =

0, sinr = 0 }
timingAdvanceError { timingAdvanceError = 0, padding0 = 0 }
cfrPucch { ElibBbBaseCfrInfoS cfrInfo { ri = 0, cfrLength = 0, cfrFormat =

0, cfrValid = 0, cfrExpected = 0, cfrCrcFlag = 0, padding0 = 0 }, cfr[] = [0, 0]
as hex: [00 00 00 00] }
Note: Check which report (pucch or pusch) is valid:

nrOfPucchReports = 1
The above print outs shows pucch report is valid.
Check if dlHarq is valid:
Page 11 4/3/2017
dlHarqValid = 1
If dlHarqValid is valid, check detectedHarqIndication:

detectedHarqIndication = 4 DTX
Two codewords (1 cw/2 cw):

detectedHarqIndication = 0 NACK/NACK
detectedHarqIndication = 1 NACK/ACK
detectedHarqIndication = 2 ACK/NACK
detectedHarqIndication = 3 ACK/ACK
One codeword:
detectedHarqIndication = 0 NACK
detectedHarqIndication = 1 ACK
5.6.3.8. UL Scheduler Checks:
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace3 trace4 trace5 trace6 trace7 UpcUlMacCeFt_UL_SCHEDULER
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace1 trace3 trace4 trace7 trace9 UpcUlMacCeFt_UL_VALIDATION
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace3 trace4 trace5 UpcUlMacCeFt_UL_LINKADAPTATION
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace5 UpcUlMacCeBl_SseSession
lhsh gcpu00256 te e all UpUlPdcpPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00256 te e all UpUlRlcPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlPdcpPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlRlcPeFt_DISCARD
lhsh gcpu00768 te e all UpDlRlcPeFt_RETRANSM
lhsh gcpu00768 te e trace1 UpDlL1*
lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace1 UpcDlMacCeBl
mtd peek -ta ulMacPeBl -signal LPP_UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_L1_MEAS2_DL_IND -pe 2 -rep
65535
mtd peek -ta ulMacPeBl -signal LPP_UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_UE_ALLOC_IND -pe 1 -rep 65535
mtd peek -ta ulMacPeBl -signal LPP_UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_L1_MEAS2_UL_IND -pe 2 -rep
65535
mtd peek -tar ulMacPeBl -sig LPP_UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_MAC_CTRL_INFO_IND -dir 1
Note! HiCap tracing needed
5.6.3.9. Other Checks:
5.6.3.9.1. CRC errors detected by UL L1

lhsh gcpu00256 te e trace1 UpUl*
[xxxx-xx-xx xx:xx:xx.xxx] 0x2ff06c39=(bfn:767, sfn:767, sf:0.40, bf:195)
ULMA1/UpUlMacPeBl_Smac TRAFFIC_ABNORMAL DEMUX: cellId=7 bbUeRef=0x70000c0
systemFrameNr=766 subframeNr=9: Demux result :MAC PDU received with TB CRC error.
TB CRC is equal to 0xe00130, expected = 0xa1915. PDU length=15 bytes (without
CRC)
mtd peek -ta ulMacCeBl -si UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_MAC_CTRL_INFO_IND -di 3
harqInfo = 1 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemHarqFeedbackAck) is the interesting
part
Page 12 4/3/2017
[xxxx-xx-xx xx:xx:xx.xxx] 0x82f7f969=(bfn:2095, sfn:47, sf:8.47, bf:150)

ULMA0/UpcUlMacCeBl_Imtdi BIN_REC : UP_ULMACPE_CI_UL_MAC_CTRL_INFO_IND (432) <=
UNKNOWN (sessionRef=0xfffff f) UpUlMacPeCiUlMacCtrlInfoIndS {
sigNo = 432
header {
cellId = 7
sfn = 47
subFrameNo = 7
}
payloadSize = 17
nrOfUeUlMacCtrlInfo = 1
ueUlMacCtrlInfo[0] {
header {
sessionRef = 117440512
harqInfo = 1 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemHarqFeedbackAck)
isDtx = 0
prbListStart = 1
prbListEnd = 2
ulHarqProcessId = 5
nrOfSduInfos = 0
nrOfMacCtrlElements = 1
size = 17
}
dummyNrOfSduInfos = 0
dummyNrOfMacCtrlElements = 0
macCtrlElementList[0] {
type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr)
powerHeadroomReport { type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr),
powerHeadroom = 0 }
cRnti { type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr), crnti = 0 }
truncatedBSR { type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr), bufferSize
= 0 }
shortBSR { type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr), bufferSize = 0
}
longBSR { type = 7 (UpUpCommonMacCommonMacCtrlElemLongBsr), bufferSizeNr1Nr2
= 0, bufferSizeNr3Nr4 = 0 }
}
}
5.6.3.9.2. The following pmCounters may be used to identify a low data rate from core to eNB:
pmIfInOctetsLink1Hi [GigaBitEthernet]
pmIfInOctetsLink1Lo [GigaBitEthernet]
Page 13 4/3/2017
By sampling them at, e.g. 10 sec intervals, and calculating the difference the low input can be identified. In such cases the
operator must be notified that its transport network needs corrections. For more details please see PRIMUS solution
SCS1100666:
[http://e-support.ericsson.se/reader_iview/ui/eserver.asp?ID=SCS1100666].
6.6.4. Troubleshooting on MPG (2010B CP04):
 Check MPG for alarms :

> #show system alarms
Display alarms on the system.
 Check S1 interface (enodeB and MME/MPG) and S5/S8 (SGW/PGW) ports/interfaces/connections for errors or
dropped packets:
> #show interfaces
> #show interfaces terse:
Display summary information about interfaces.
> #show interfaces gc-fpc/pic/port <brief | detail | extensive >
none—Display information about all interfaces.
gc-fpc/pic/port—Name of a GGSN-C interface.
brief—(Optional) Display brief interface information.
detail—(Optional) Display detailed interface information.
extensive—(Optional) Display very detailed interface information.
Similarly, this command can be used to check details on GGSN-U interface.
The application alarms can only be reached by Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
> #show snmp mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.10923.1.1.1
Display the value of all objects of the entire GGSN MIB by using the above command.
> #show snmp mib get 1.3.6.1.4.1.10923.1.1.1.1.1.3.2.0
Display the total number of active PDP contexts by using the above command.
#show snmp mib walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.10923.1.1.1.1.1.5
Display the statistics for all APN’s, including the indices used for identifying particular APN’s by using the above
command.
#show snmp mib get 1.3.6.1.4.1.10923.1.1.1.1.1.5.1.3.1
Display the number of active PDP contexts of the particular APN with index 1 by using the above command.
 Tracing operations provide more detailed information about the operation of the GGSN, its routing-protocols, and
services. It is used as a troubleshooting tool rather than as a tool for continuous information collection
Tracing can be configured to collect general routing information, interface, protocol, or service specific information.
All trace files are created in /var/log unless otherwise specified.

The symptoms of a problem in the network are usually quite obvious, such as the failure to reach a remote host.
Solution: To identify the symptoms of a problem on the network, start at one end of network and follow the routes to the
other end, entering all or one of the following
user@host> ping (ip-address | host-name)
user@host> show route (ip-address | host-name)
user@host> traceroute (ip-address | host-name)
Page 14 4/3/2017
References :
1. PLM LTE Wiki Page
http://lte-plm.rnd.ki.sw.ericsson.se/lte_trsh_wiki/L12A/index.php?n=UseCases.UserThroughputDegraded
2. Vzn LTE-SAE Throughput Troubleshooting
LTE-SAE Slow
Throughput_Rev_0.1
Page 15 4/3/2017

LTE Throughput Troubleshooting Guidleline

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

LTE Throughput Troubleshooting Guidleline

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

LTE THROUGHPUT TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDELINE

1. How to use this Guideline ........................................................................................................................................... 2

1. How to use this Guideline

How Common Yes Isolate and

No Subs Is this Yes Engage other

Figure 1: Troubleshooting Flow Chart

Ask yourself and the customer

2.1. Data Rate

2.2. HARQ based outer-loop

3. Isolation and Troubleshooting

3.1. Between the Ue and enodeB:

3.2. Between enodeB and MPG:

8. S11 on SGW (optional*)

4. Basic Health Checks

5. General Checks outside of the node

5.2. CPRI cables

Figure 2 CPRI Connections

5.3. Ue and RF conditions

5.5. General Checks inside enodeB:

O52A7X> get MACConfiguration|DataRadioBearer

111102-11:47:52 172.26.132.57 8.0y ERBS_NODE_MODEL_B_1_53_COMPLETE

In the printout above check

dlMaxRetxThreshold and ulMaxRetxThreshold - Maximum number of RLC re-transmissions in DL

5.6. Case specific trouble shooting and traces in enodeB

6.6.1. Traces Summary DL:

lhsh gcpu01024 te e trace4 UpcDlMacCeFt_DL_SCHEDULER

6.6.2. Trace Validation DL:

6.6.3. Traces Summary UL:

mtd peek -ta dlMacPeBl -si UP_DLMACPE_CI_UL_HARQ_ALLOC_IND -di 1

isDtx { isDtx = 0, padding0 = 0 }

rxPower { prbListStart = 1, prbListEnd = 4, rxPowerReport = -695, padding0 =

5.6.3.6. GINR on DL:

Example trace output

isDtx { isDtx = 0, padding0 = 0 }

dlHarqInfo { dlHarqValid = 1, detectedHarqIndication = 0, dlHarqProcessId =

timingAdvanceError { timingAdvanceError = 0, padding0 = 0 }

cfrPusch { ElibBbBaseCfrInfoS cfrInfo { ri = 7, cfrLength = 118, cfrFormat =

isDtx { isDtx = 0, padding0 = 0 }

dlHarqInfo { dlHarqValid = 1, detectedHarqIndication = 0, dlHarqProcessId =

rxPower { prbListStart = 0, prbListEnd = 0, rxPowerReport = -630, padding0 =

timingAdvanceError { timingAdvanceError = 0, padding0 = 0 }

cfrPucch { ElibBbBaseCfrInfoS cfrInfo { ri = 0, cfrLength = 0, cfrFormat =

Note: Check which report (pucch or pusch) is valid:

The above print outs shows pucch report is valid.

Check if dlHarq is valid:

If dlHarqValid is valid, check detectedHarqIndication:

Two codewords (1 cw/2 cw):

5.6.3.9.1. CRC errors detected by UL L1

[xxxx-xx-xx xx:xx:xx.xxx] 0x82f7f969=(bfn:2095, sfn:47, sf:8.47, bf:150)

6.6.4. Troubleshooting on MPG (2010B CP04):

 Check MPG for alarms :

All trace files are created in /var/log unless otherwise specified.

2. Vzn LTE-SAE Throughput Troubleshooting

Anda mungkin juga menyukai