The writing process relies on receiving rigorous candid feedback from outside readers. Whether critiquing
a colleague’s writing or your own writing, thoroughly interrogate the document, rather than simply
checking for spelling and grammar errors. Developing critical evaluation skills takes practice. The
following tips should guide your evaluation process of technical scholarly writing.
General Advice:
As you critique, it is imperative to look for things that could be unclear or appear awkward to an
outside reader.
Do not make any assumptions about what the author “meant to say,” but instead let the words
“speak for themselves.”
Identify all the possible things that could be problematic.
Information/Facts:
Are there too many quoted passages (resulting in a collage of quotes)?
Is summarized information clearly and carefully explained?
What is the significance of the information presented?
o Why is it significant? How is it significant?
o Is it clear that the information is significant?
What is the relevance of the information presented?
o Why is it relevant? How is it relevant?
o Is it clear that the information is relevant?
Evidence:
Are all assertions or claims supported with detailed, specific evidence?
Or, does the author offer an opinion without evidence to support their claim?
Grammar
Use active verbs
Maintain subject/verb agreement
Maintain verb tense consistency throughout the document
Avoid passive voice.
Avoid first person: I, we
1
Avoid sentence constructions such as: “One can see . . . ” or “As you can see . . .”
Avoid run-on sentences
Avoid sentence fragments
Awkward sentence structure (How can this sentence be restructured and reworded to be more
clear or precise for an outside reader?)
Awkward phrase structure (How can this phrase be restructured and reworded to be more clear or
precise for an outside reader?)