1 Cannabinoid 1
1.1 Cannabinoid receptors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Cannabinoid receptor type 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.2 Cannabinoid receptor type 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Phytocannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2.1 Cannabis-derived cannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2.2 Cannabinoids from other plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.3 Cannabis plant profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2.4 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.5 Separation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.6 Natural occurrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.7 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Endocannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.1 Types of endocannabinoid ligands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.2 Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Synthetic cannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Table of natural cannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.6 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.7 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.8 Further reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.9 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.9.1 Cannabinoid information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.9.2 Cannabinoid research organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2 Entourage effect 11
2.1 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3 Synthetic cannabis 12
3.1 Misnomer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2 Ingredients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2.1 Artificial cannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.3 Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
i
ii CONTENTS
4 4-HTMPIPO 21
4.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5 5F-PB-22 22
5.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6 A-40174 23
6.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
6.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 A-41988 24
7.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8 A-796,260 25
8.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
8.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
9 A-834,735 26
9.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
9.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
10 A-836,339 27
10.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
11 AB-001 28
11.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
11.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
12 AB-005 29
12.1 Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
CONTENTS iii
13 AB-CHMINACA 30
13.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
14 AB-FUBINACA 31
14.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
14.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
15 AB-PINACA 32
15.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
15.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
16 Abnormal cannabidiol 33
16.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
16.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
17 ADB-FUBINACA 35
17.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
17.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
18 ADB-PINACA 36
18.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
18.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
19 ADBICA 37
19.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
19.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
20 Ajulemic acid 38
20.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
21 AM-087 39
21.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
21.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
22 AM-1220 40
22.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
22.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
23 AM-1221 41
23.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
23.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
24 AM-1235 42
iv CONTENTS
24.1 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
24.1.1 Pharmacodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
24.1.2 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
24.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
24.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
25 AM-1241 43
25.1 Effects in bone cancer model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
25.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
25.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
26 AM-1248 45
26.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
26.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
27 AM-1714 46
27.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
27.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
28 AM-2201 47
28.1 Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
28.2 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
28.2.1 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
28.3 Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
28.4 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
28.5 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
29 AM-2232 48
29.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
29.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
30 AM-2233 49
30.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
30.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
31 AM-2389 50
31.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
31.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
32 AM-4030 51
32.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
32.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
33 AM-411 52
33.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
CONTENTS v
33.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
34 AM-630 53
34.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
34.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
35 AM-6545 54
35.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
35.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
36 AM-679 (cannabinoid) 55
36.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
36.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
37 AM-694 56
37.1 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
37.1.1 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
37.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
37.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
38 AM-855 57
38.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
39 AM-905 58
39.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
40 AM-906 59
40.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
40.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
41 AM-919 60
41.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
41.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
42 AM-938 61
42.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
42.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
43 AM404 62
43.1 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
43.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
43.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
44 AMG-1 63
44.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
vi CONTENTS
45 AMG-3 64
45.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
46 AMG-36 65
46.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
47 AMG-41 66
47.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
48 APINACA 67
48.1 Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
48.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
48.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
49 AR-231,453 68
49.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
49.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
50 Arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide 69
50.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
51 Arachidonylcyclopropylamide 70
51.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
52 N-Arachidonylglycine 71
52.1 Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
52.2 Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
52.2.1 Effects on the nervous system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
52.2.2 Effects on the immune system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
52.2.3 Cell migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
52.2.4 Other targets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
52.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
53 AZ-11713908 74
53.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
53.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
54 BAY 38-7271 75
54.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
55 BAY 59-3074 76
55.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
56 BML-190 77
56.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
CONTENTS vii
57 (C6)-CP 47,497 78
57.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
58 (C9)-CP 47,497 79
58.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
59 Canbisol 80
59.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
59.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
60 Cannabichromene 81
60.1 Medical uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
60.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
61 Cannabicyclohexanol 82
61.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
61.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
62 Cannabicyclol 83
62.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
62.2 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
63 Cannabidiol 84
63.1 Clinical applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
63.1.1 Antimicrobial actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
63.1.2 Neurological effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
63.1.3 Psychotropic effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
63.1.4 Dravet syndrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.2 CBD-enhanced cannabis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.3 Industrial hemp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.4 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.4.1 Pharmacodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.4.2 Pharmacokinetic interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.4.3 Pharmaceutical preparations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.5 Isomerism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
63.6 Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
63.6.1 Biosynthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
63.7 Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
63.8 US patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
63.9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
63.10External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
64 Cannabidivarin 90
64.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
viii CONTENTS
64.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
64.3 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
65 Cannabigerol 91
65.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
65.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
66 Cannabinoidergic 92
66.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
66.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
67 Cannabinol 93
67.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
67.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
67.3 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
68 Cannabivarin 94
68.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
68.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
68.3 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
69 Caryophyllene 95
69.1 Natural sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
69.2 Compendial status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
69.3 Notes and references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
70 CB-13 98
70.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
70.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
71 CBS-0550 99
71.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
71.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
72 CP 47,497 100
72.1 Homologue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2 Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.1 Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.2 France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.3 Latvia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.4 Lithuania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.5 Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.6 Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
72.2.7 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
CONTENTS ix
73 CP 55,244 102
73.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
73.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
74 CP 55,940 103
74.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
74.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
75 Dexanabinol 104
75.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
76 Dimethylheptylpyran 105
76.1 Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
76.2 Investigation as non-lethal incapacitating agent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
76.3 Isomerism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
76.4 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
77 Docosatetraenoylethanolamide 107
77.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
78 Drinabant 108
78.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
78.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
79 EAM-2201 109
79.1 Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
79.2 Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
79.3 Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
79.4 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
83 GW-405,833 121
83.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
84 GW-842,166X 122
84.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
85 Hemopressin 123
85.1 Role in diet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
85.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
85.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
86 HU-210 124
86.1 Recreational use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.2 Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.2.1 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.2.2 New Zealand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.3 Other HU Cannabinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.4 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
86.5 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
86.6 External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
87 HU-243 126
87.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
CONTENTS xi
88 HU-308 127
88.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
88.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
89 HU-331 128
89.1 Mechanism of action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
89.2 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
89.3 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
90 11-Hydroxy-THC 130
90.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
91 9-nor-9β-Hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol 131
91.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
91.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
92 Ibipinabant 132
92.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
92.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
93 IDFP 133
93.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
93.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
94 2-Isopropyl-5-methyl-1-(2,6-dihydroxy-4-nonylphenyl)cyclohex-1-ene 134
94.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
96 JTE-907 136
96.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
96.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
97 JWH-015 137
97.1 Metabolism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
97.2 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
98 JWH-051 138
98.1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
99 JWH-057 139
99.1 See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
xii CONTENTS
100JWH-120 140
100.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
100.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
101JWH-122 141
101.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
101.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
102JWH-133 142
102.1Legal Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
102.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
102.3External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
103JWH-148 143
103.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
103.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
104JWH-149 144
104.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
104.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
105JWH-161 145
105.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
106JWH-176 146
106.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
106.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
107JWH-359 147
107.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
108JZL184 148
108.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
108.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
109JZL195 149
109.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
109.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
110KM-233 150
110.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
110.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
111L-759,633 151
CONTENTS xiii
112L-759,656 152
112.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
112.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
113LASSBio-881 153
113.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
115Leelamine 155
115.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
115.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
116Levonantradol 156
116.1Pharmacodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
116.2Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
116.3Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
116.4Side effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
116.5See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
116.6Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
116.7References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
119LY-2183240 164
119.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
119.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
120LY-320,135 165
120.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
121MAM-2201 166
121.1Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
xiv CONTENTS
122MDA-19 167
122.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
122.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
123Menabitan 168
123.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
123.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
124Methanandamide 169
124.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
125MK-9470 170
125.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
126N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-methoxyindole-3-carboxamide 171
126.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
126.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
126.3Further reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
127Nabazenil 173
127.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
128Nabilone 174
128.1Medical uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
128.2Adverse effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
128.3See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
128.4References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
129Nabitan 176
129.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
130Nabiximols 177
130.1Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
130.2Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
130.3Side effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
130.4Controversy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
130.5See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
130.6References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
130.7External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
131Naboctate 180
131.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
CONTENTS xv
132NESS-0327 181
132.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
132.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
133NESS-040C5 182
133.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
133.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
134NMP-7 183
134.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
135Nonabine 184
135.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
13611-nor-9-Carboxy-THC 185
136.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
137O-1057 187
137.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
137.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
138O-1125 188
138.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
139O-1238 189
139.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
140O-1269 190
140.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
141O-1602 191
141.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
141.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
142O-1812 192
142.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
142.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
143O-1871 193
143.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
143.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
144O-1918 194
144.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
144.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
xvi CONTENTS
145O-2050 195
145.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
145.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
146O-2113 196
146.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
146.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
147O-2372 197
147.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
147.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
148O-2545 198
148.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
148.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
149O-2694 199
149.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
149.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
150O-774 200
150.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
150.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
151O-806 201
151.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
152O-823 202
152.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
156Otenabant 206
156.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
156.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
157Parahexyl 207
CONTENTS xvii
157.1Isomerism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
157.2See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
157.3References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
158UR-144 208
158.1Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
158.2History of use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
158.3Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
158.4See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
158.5References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
158.6Further reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
159Perrottetinene 210
159.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
160PF-03550096 211
160.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
160.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
161PF-514273 212
161.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
162PipISB 213
162.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
163Pirnabine 214
163.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
164PSB-SB-1202 215
164.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
164.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
165PSB-SB-487 216
165.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
165.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
166QUCHIC 217
166.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
166.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
167QUPIC 218
167.1Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
167.2Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
167.3See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
167.4References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
xviii CONTENTS
168Rimonabant 219
168.1History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
168.2Uses/potential uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
168.2.1 Obesity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
168.2.2 Smoking cessation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.2.3 Addiction behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.2.4 Short-term memory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.2.5 Blockage of cannabis effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.3Other effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.4Negative side effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.5Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.6Brand names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
168.7References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
169Rosonabant 222
169.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
169.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
170S-444,823 223
170.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
170.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
171SDB-001 224
171.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
171.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
172SDB-006 225
172.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
172.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
173SER-601 226
173.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
173.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
174Serinolamide A 227
174.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
174.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
175SR-144,528 228
175.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
175.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
176Stearoylethanolamide 229
176.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229
CONTENTS xix
178Surinabant 231
178.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
178.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
179Taranabant 232
179.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
179.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
180Tedalinab 233
180.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
180.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
182Tetrahydrocannabinol 235
182.1Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
182.1.1 Appetite and taste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
182.2Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
182.2.1 Discovery and structure identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
182.2.2 Isomerism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
182.3Medical uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
182.3.1 Multiple sclerosis symptoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.3.2 Neurodegenerative disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.3.3 Other neurological disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.3.4 Other studies in humans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.4Adverse effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.4.1 Acute toxicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
182.4.2 Cognitive effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
182.4.3 Impact on psychosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
182.4.4 Other potential long-term effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
182.4.5 Interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
182.5Mechanism of action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
182.5.1 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
182.6Biosynthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
182.7Chemical synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
182.8Marinol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
182.8.1 Comparisons with medical marijuana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
xx CONTENTS
183Tetrahydrocannabinol-C4 246
183.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
183.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
185Tetrahydrocannabivarin 249
185.1Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
185.2Biosynthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
185.3See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
185.4References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
185.5External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
186THC-O-acetate 250
186.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
187THC-O-phosphate 251
187.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
188Tinabinol 252
188.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
188.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
189URB602 253
189.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
190URB754 254
190.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
191VCHSR 255
191.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
192VDM-11 256
192.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
192.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
193.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
197AM251 263
197.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
197.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
198Aminoalkylindole 264
198.1Legality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
198.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
198.3External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
199Cannabipiperidiethanone 265
199.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
199.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
200JWH-193 266
200.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
200.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
201JWH-198 267
201.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
201.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
202JWH-200 268
202.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
202.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
203Pravadoline 269
203.1Animal studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
xxii CONTENTS
204RCS-4 270
204.1Legality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
204.2See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
204.3References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
205Anandamide 271
205.1History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
205.2Physiological functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
205.3Synthesis and degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
205.4Medical benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
205.5See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
205.6References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
205.7External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
2072-Arachidonoylglycerol 275
207.1Occurrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.2Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.3Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.4Biosynthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.5See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.6References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
207.6.1 Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
207.6.2 General references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
209Oleamide 279
209.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
209.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
CONTENTS xxiii
210RVD-Hpα 280
210.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
211Virodhamine 281
211.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
211.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
212HU-320 282
212.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
212.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
213HU-336 283
213.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
213.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
214HU-345 284
214.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
214.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
217JWH-007 287
217.1Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
217.2See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
217.3References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
218Naphthoylindole 288
218.1History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
218.2Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
218.2.1 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
218.3Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
218.4Detection in biological fluids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
218.5Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
218.6Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
218.7See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
xxiv CONTENTS
218.8References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
218.9External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
219JWH-019 292
219.1Legal Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.1.1 Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.1.2 Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.1.3 UK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.1.4 USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.2See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
219.3References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
220JWH-030 293
220.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
220.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
221JWH-047 294
221.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
221.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
222JWH-048 295
222.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
222.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
223JWH-073 296
223.1Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
223.2Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
223.3Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
223.3.1 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
223.3.2 Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
223.3.3 New Zealand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
223.4See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
223.5References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
224JWH-081 298
224.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
224.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
225JWH-098 299
225.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
225.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
226JWH-116 300
226.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
CONTENTS xxv
226.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
227JWH-147 301
227.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
227.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
228JWH-164 302
228.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
229Phenylacetylindole 303
229.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
230JWH-175 304
230.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
230.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
231JWH-184 305
231.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
231.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
232JWH-185 306
232.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
232.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
233JWH-196 307
233.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
233.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
234JWH-203 308
234.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
234.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
235JWH-210 309
235.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
235.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
236JWH-249 310
236.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
236.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
237JWH-250 311
237.1History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
237.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
238JWH-251 312
238.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
xxvi CONTENTS
239JWH-302 313
239.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
240JWH-307 314
240.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
240.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
241JWH-398 315
241.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
241.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
242JWH-424 316
242.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
242.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
243Naphthoylindole 317
243.1History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
243.2Pharmacology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
243.2.1 Pharmacokinetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
243.3Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
243.4Detection in biological fluids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
243.5Legal status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
243.6Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
243.7See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
243.8References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
243.9External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
244Phenylacetylindole 321
244.1References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
245RCS-8 322
245.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
245.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
249PSN-375,963 326
249.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
249.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
250PSN-632,408 327
250.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
250.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
252TM-38837 329
252.1See also . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
252.2References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
252.3External links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
252.4Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
252.4.1 Text . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
252.4.2 Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
252.4.3 Content license . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
Chapter 1
Cannabinoid
Cannabinoids are a class of diverse chemical com- including the hippocampus.[1] They are also found in the
pounds that act on cannabinoid receptors on cells that cerebellum and in both male and female reproductive sys-
repress neurotransmitter release in the brain. These tems. CB1 receptors are absent in the medulla oblongata,
receptor proteins include the endocannabinoids (pro- the part of the brain stem responsible for respiratory and
duced naturally in the body by humans and animals),[1] cardiovascular functions. Thus, there is not the risk of
the phytocannabinoids (found in cannabis and some respiratory or cardiovascular failure that can be produced
other plants), and synthetic cannabinoids (manufac- by some drugs. CB1 receptors appear to be responsible
tured chemically). The most notable cannabinoid is for the euphoric and anticonvulsive effects of cannabis.
the phytocannabinoid ∆9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC),
the primary psychoactive compound of cannabis.[2][3]
Cannabidiol (CBD) is another major constituent of the 1.1.2 Cannabinoid receptor type 2
plant, representing up to 40% in extracts of the plant
resin.[4] There are at least 85 different cannabinoids iso- Main article: Cannabinoid receptor type 2
lated from cannabis, exhibiting varied effects.[5]
Synthetic cannabinoids encompass a variety of dis- CB2 receptors are predominantly found in the immune
tinct chemical classes: the classical cannabinoids struc- system, or immune-derived cells[8] with the greatest den-
turally related to THC, the nonclassical cannabinoids sity in the spleen. While found only in the peripheral
(cannabimimetics) including the aminoalkylindoles, 1,5- nervous system, a report does indicate that CB2 is ex-
diarylpyrazoles, quinolines, and arylsulfonamides, as well pressed by a subpopulation of microglia in the human
as eicosanoids related to the endocannabinoids.[2] cerebellum.[9] CB2 receptors appear to be responsible for
the anti-inflammatory and possibly other therapeutic ef-
fects of cannabis.[8]
1.1 Cannabinoid receptors
Before the 1980s, it was often speculated that cannabi- 1.2 Phytocannabinoids
noids produced their physiological and behavioral effects
via nonspecific interaction with cell membranes, instead
1.2.1 Cannabis-derived cannabinoids
of interacting with specific membrane-bound receptors.
The discovery of the first cannabinoid receptors in the
The classical cannabinoids are concentrated in a vis-
1980s helped to resolve this debate. These receptors are
cous resin produced in structures known as glandular
common in animals, and have been found in mammals,
trichomes. At least 85 different cannabinoids have been
birds, fish, and reptiles. At present, there are two known
isolated from the Cannabis plant[5] To the right, the main
types of cannabinoid receptors, termed CB1 and CB2 ,[1]
classes of cannabinoids from Cannabis are shown. The
with mounting evidence of more.[6] The human brain has
best studied cannabinoids include tetrahydrocannabinol
more cannabinoid receptors than any other G protein-
(THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN).
coupled receptor (GPCR) type.[7]
Types
1.1.1 Cannabinoid receptor type 1
All classes derive from cannabigerol-type compounds and
Main article: Cannabinoid receptor type 1 differ mainly in the way this precursor is cyclized.[10] The
classical cannabinoids are derived from their respective
CB1 receptors are found primarily in the brain, more 2-carboxylic acids (2-COOH) by decarboxylation (cat-
specifically in the basal ganglia and in the limbic system, alyzed by heat, light, or alkaline conditions).[11]
1
2 CHAPTER 1. CANNABINOID
The bracts surrounding a cluster of Cannabis sativa flowers are Cannabidiol Main article: Cannabidiol
coated with cannabinoid-laden trichomes
• CBGV (Cannabigerovarin)
Cannabinol Main article: Cannabinol
• CBGM (Cannabigerol Monomethyl Ether)
1.2. PHYTOCANNABINOIDS 3
Cannabinol (CBN) is the primary product of THC degra- There is potential for confusion because there are dif-
dation, and there is usually little of it in a fresh plant. CBN ferent numbering systems used to describe the position
content increases as THC degrades in storage, and with of this double bond. Under the dibenzopyran number-
exposure to light and air. It is only mildly psychoactive. ing system widely used today, the major form of THC
Its affinity to the CB2 receptor is higher than for the CB1 is called Δ9 -THC, while the minor form is called Δ8 -
receptor.[30] THC. Under the alternate terpene numbering system,
these same compounds are called Δ1 -THC and Δ6 -THC,
respectively.
Cannabigerol Main article: Cannabigerol
recreational purposes are usually bred for high THC con- 1.2.6 Natural occurrence
tent or for a specific chemical balance.
Quantitative analysis of a plant’s cannabinoid profile is of- Main article: Medical_cannabis § Difference between
ten determined by gas chromatography (GC), or more re- C. indica and C. sativa
liably by gas chromatography combined with mass spec-
trometry (GC/MS). Liquid chromatography (LC) tech- Cannabis indica may have a CBD:THC ratio 4–5 times
niques are also possible, and, unlike GC methods, can that of Cannabis sativa.
differentiate between the acid and neutral forms of the
cannabinoids. There have been systematic attempts to
monitor the cannabinoid profile of cannabis over time, 1.2.7 History
but their accuracy is impeded by the illegal status of the
plant in many countries. Cannabinoids were first discovered in the 1940s, when
CBD and CBN were identified. The structure of THC
was first determined in 1964.
Due to molecular similarity and ease of synthetic con-
1.2.4 Pharmacology version, CBD was originally believed to be a natural pre-
cursor to THC. However, it is now known that CBD and
THC are produced independently in the cannabis plant
Cannabinoids can be administered by smoking, vaporiz-
from the precursor CBG.
ing, oral ingestion, transdermal patch, intravenous injec-
tion, sublingual absorption, or rectal suppository. Once in
the body, most cannabinoids are metabolized in the liver,
especially by cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidases, 1.3 Endocannabinoids
mainly CYP 2C9. Thus supplementing with CYP 2C9
inhibitors leads to extended intoxication. For more details on the roles and regulation of the endo-
Some is also stored in fat in addition to being metabo- cannabinoids, see Endocannabinoid system.
lized in the liver. Δ9 -THC is metabolized to 11-hydroxy- Endocannabinoids are substances produced from within
Δ9 -THC, which is then metabolized to 9-carboxy-THC.
Some cannabis metabolites can be detected in the body
several weeks after administration. These metabolites
are the chemicals recognized by common antibody-based
“drug tests"; in the case of THC or others, these loads
do not represent intoxication (compare to ethanol breath
tests that measure instantaneous blood alcohol levels), but
an integration of past consumption over an approximately
month-long window. This is because they are fat-soluble,
lipophilic molecules that accumulate in fatty tissues.[44]
Cannabinoids can be separated from the plant by the body that activate cannabinoid receptors. After the
extraction with organic solvents. Hydrocarbons and discovery of the first cannabinoid receptor in 1988, sci-
alcohols are often used as solvents. However, these sol- entists began searching for an endogenous ligand for the
vents are flammable and many are toxic. Butane may be receptor.
used, which evaporates extremely quickly. Supercritical
solvent extraction with carbon dioxide is an alternative
technique. Although this process requires high pressures
1.3.1 Types of endocannabinoid ligands
(73 atmospheres or more), there is minimal risk of fire
Arachidonoylethanolamine (Anandamide or AEA)
or toxicity, solvent removal is simple and efficient, and
extract quality can be well controlled. Once extracted,
cannabinoid blends can be separated into individual com- Main article: Arachidonoylethanolamine
ponents using wiped film vacuum distillation or other
distillation techniques. However, to produce high-purity In 1992, in Raphael Mechoulam's lab, the first such com-
cannabinoids, chemical synthesis or semisynthesis is gen- pound was identified as arachidonoyl ethanolamine and
erally required. named anandamide, a name derived from the Sanskrit
1.3. ENDOCANNABINOIDS 5
word for bliss and -amide. Anandamide is derived from N-Arachidonoyl dopamine (NADA)
arachidonic acid. It has a pharmacology similar to THC,
although its chemical structure is different. Anandamide Main article: N-Arachidonoyl dopamine
binds to the central (CB1 ) and, to a lesser extent, pe-
ripheral (CB2 ) cannabinoid receptors, where it acts as a
partial agonist. Anandamide is about as potent as THC Discovered in 2000, NADA preferentially binds to the
at the CB1 receptor.[45] Anandamide is found in nearly CB1 receptor.[54] Like anandamide, NADA is also an
all tissues in a wide range of animals.[46] Anandamide agonist for the vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (TRPV1), a
has also been found in plants, including small amounts member of the vanilloid receptor family.[55][56]
in chocolate.[47]
Two analogs of anandamide, 7,10,13,16-
docosatetraenoylethanolamide and homo-γ- Virodhamine (OAE)
linolenoylethanolamine, have similar pharmacology.
All of these are members of a family of signalling
Main article: Virodhamine
lipids called N-acylethanolamines, which also includes
the noncannabimimetic palmitoylethanolamide and
oleoylethanolamide, which possess anti-inflammatory A fifth endocannabinoid, virodhamine, or O-
and orexigenic effects, respectively. Many N- arachidonoyl-ethanolamine (OAE), was discovered
acylethanolamines have also been identified in plant in June 2002. Although it is a full agonist at CB2 and
seeds[48] and in molluscs.[49] a partial agonist at CB1 , it behaves as a CB1 antag-
onist in vivo. In rats, virodhamine was found to be
present at comparable or slightly lower concentrations
than anandamide in the brain, but 2- to 9-fold higher
2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) concentrations peripherally.[57]
Lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI)
Another endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, binds
to both the CB1 and CB2 receptors with similar affin-
ity, acting as a full agonist at both.[45] 2-AG is present Recent evidence has highlighted lysophosphatidylinositol
at significantly higher concentrations in the brain than as the endogenous ligand to novel endocannabinoid re-
anandamide,[50] and there is some controversy over ceptor GPR55, making it a strong contender as the sixth
whether 2-AG rather than anandamide is chiefly respon- endocannabinoid.[58]
sible for endocannabinoid signalling in vivo.[1] In partic-
ular, one in vitro study suggests that 2-AG is capable of
stimulating higher G-protein activation than anandamide,
although the physiological implications of this finding are 1.3.2 Function
not yet known.[51]
Endocannabinoids serve as intercellular 'lipid messen-
gers', signaling molecules that are released from one
cell and activating the cannabinoid receptors present on
2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether (noladin ether) other nearby cells. Although in this intercellular signal-
ing role they are similar to the well-known monoamine
Main article: 2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine and dopamine,
endocannabinoids differ in numerous ways from them.
In 2001, a third, ether-type endocannabinoid, 2- For instance, they are used in retrograde signaling be-
arachidonyl glyceryl ether (noladin ether), was isolated tween neurons. Furthermore, endocannabinoids are
from porcine brain.[52] Prior to this discovery, it had been lipophilic molecules that are not very soluble in water.
synthesized as a stable analog of 2-AG; indeed, some con- They are not stored in vesicles, and exist as integral con-
troversy remains over its classification as an endocannabi- stituents of the membrane bilayers that make up cells.
noid, as another group failed to detect the substance at They are believed to be synthesized 'on-demand' rather
“any appreciable amount” in the brains of several differ- than made and stored for later use. The mechanisms
ent mammalian species.[53] It binds to the CB1 cannabi- and enzymes underlying the biosynthesis of endocannabi-
noid receptor (Kᵢ = 21.2 nmol/L) and causes sedation, hy- noids remain elusive and continue to be an area of active
pothermia, intestinal immobility, and mild antinocicep- research.
tion in mice. It binds primarily to the CB1 receptor, and The endocannabinoid 2-AG has been found in bovine and
only weakly to the CB2 receptor.[45] human maternal milk.[59]
6 CHAPTER 1. CANNABINOID
Range • JWH-073
[8] Pacher, P.; Mechoulam, R. (2011). “Is lipid signal- [19] Russo, Ethan B.; Burnett, Andrea; Hall, Brian; Parker,
ing through cannabinoid 2 receptors part of a protec- Keith K. (2005). “Agonistic Properties of Cannabid-
tive system?". Progress in Lipid Research 50 (2): 193– iol at 5-HT1a Receptors”. Neurochemical Research 30
211. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2011.01.001. PMC 3062638. (8): 1037–43. doi:10.1007/s11064-005-6978-1. PMID
PMID 21295074. 16258853.
[9] Núñez, Estefanía; Benito, Cristina; Pazos, M. Ruth; Bar- [20] Zanelati, TV; Biojone, C; Moreira, FA; Guimarães,
bachano, Antonio; Fajardo, Otto; González, Sara; Tolón, FS; Joca, SRL (2010). “Antidepressant-like effects of
Rosa M.; Romero, Julián (2004). “Cannabinoid CB2 cannabidiol in mice: Possible involvement of 5-HT1A
receptors are expressed by perivascular microglial cells receptors”. British Journal of Pharmacology 159 (1):
in the human brain: An immunohistochemical study”. 122–8. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00521.x. PMC
Synapse 53 (4): 208–13. doi:10.1002/syn.20050. PMID 2823358. PMID 20002102.
15266552.
[21] Resstel, Leonardo B.M.; Tavares, Rodrigo F.; Lisboa,
[10] Zenk, H. (2001). “Biosynthesis of cannabi- Sabrina F.S.; Joca, Sâmia R.L.; Corrêa, Fernando M.A.;
noids”. Eur. J. Biochem 268 (6): 1596–1604. Guimarães, Francisco S. (2009). “5-HT1Areceptors are
8 CHAPTER 1. CANNABINOID
involved in the cannabidiol-induced attenuation of be- [31] Cascio, MG; Gauson, LA; Stevenson, LA; Ross, RA;
havioural and cardiovascular responses to acute restraint Pertwee, RG (2010). “Evidence that the plant cannabi-
stress in rats”. British Journal of Pharmacology 156 (1): noid cannabigerol is a highly potent α2-adrenoceptor ag-
181–8. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00046.x. PMC onist and moderately potent 5HT1A receptor antago-
2697769. PMID 19133999. nist”. British Journal of Pharmacology 159 (1): 129–41.
doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00515.x. PMC 2823359.
[22] Campos, Alline Cristina; Guimarães, Francisco Sil- PMID 20002104.
veira (2008). “Involvement of 5HT1A receptors in the
anxiolytic-like effects of cannabidiol injected into the dor- [32] Baker, PB; Gough, TA; Taylor, BJ (1980). “Illicitly im-
solateral periaqueductal gray of rats”. Psychopharmacol- ported Cannabis products: Some physical and chemical
ogy 199 (2): 223–30. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1168-x. features indicative of their origin”. Bulletin on narcotics
PMID 18446323. 32 (2): 31–40. PMID 6907024.
[23] Mishima, K.; Khoutorova, K.; Zhao, K.; Vigdorchik, [33] Hillig, K. W.; Mahlberg, P. G. (2004). “A chemo-
T.; Belayev, N.; Busto, K.; Magal, M.; Gins- taxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis
berg, MD (2005). “Cannabidiol Prevents Cerebral (Cannabaceae)". American Journal of Botany 91 (6):
Infarction Via a Serotonergic 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A 966–75. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.6.966. PMID 21653452.
Receptor-Dependent Mechanism”. Stroke 36 (5): 1071–
6. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000163083.59201.34. PMID [34] Thomas, Adèle; Stevenson, Lesley A; Wease, Kerrie N;
15845890. Price, Martin R; Baillie, Gemma; Ross, Ruth A; Per-
twee, Roger G (2005). “Evidence that the plant cannabi-
[24] Hayakawa, Kazuhide; Mishima, Kenichi; Nozako, noid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin is a cannabinoid CB1and
Masanori; Ogata, Ayumi; Hazekawa, Mai; Liu, CB2receptor antagonist”. British Journal of Pharmacol-
An-Xin; Fujioka, Masayuki; Abe, Kohji; Hasebe, ogy 146 (7): 917–26. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706414. PMC
Nobuyoshi; Egashira, Nobuaki; Iwasaki, Katsunori; 1751228. PMID 16205722.
Fujiwara, Michihiro (2007). “Repeated treatment
[35] Merkus, Frans W. H. M. (1971). “Cannabivarin
with cannabidiol but not Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
and Tetrahydrocannabivarin, Two New Con-
has a neuroprotective effect without the development
stituents of Hashish”. Nature 232 (5312): 579–80.
of tolerance”. Neuropharmacology 52 (4): 1079–
doi:10.1038/232579a0. PMID 4937510.
87. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.11.005. PMID
17320118. [36] Bauer, Rudolf; Salo-Ahen, Karin; Bauer, Outi
(2008). “CB Receptor Ligands from Plants”. Cur-
[25] Leweke, F M; Piomelli, D; Pahlisch, F; Muhl, D; Gerth,
rent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 8 (3): 173–86.
C W; Hoyer, C; Klosterkötter, J; Hellmich, M; Koethe, D
doi:10.2174/156802608783498023. PMID 18289087.
(2012). “Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and
alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia”. Trans- [37] Bauer, R.; Remiger, P. (2007). “TLC and HPLC Anal-
lational Psychiatry 2 (3): e94–. doi:10.1038/tp.2012.15. ysis of Alkamides inEchinaceaDrugs1,2”. Planta Med-
PMC 3316151. PMID 22832859. ica 55 (4): 367–71. doi:10.1055/s-2006-962030. PMID
17262436.
[26] “Pot compound seen as tool against cancer”. SFGate.
[38] Raduner, S; Majewska, A; Chen, J; Xie, X; Hamon, J;
[27] McAllister, S. D.; Christian, R. T.; Horowitz, M. P.; Faller, B; Altmann, K; Gertsch, J (2006). “Alkylamides
Garcia, A.; Desprez, P.-Y. (2007). “Cannabidiol as a from Echinacea Are a New Class of Cannabinomimetics:
novel inhibitor of Id-1 gene expression in aggressive breast CANNABINOID TYPE 2 RECEPTOR-DEPENDENT
cancer cells”. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 6 (11): AND -INDEPENDENT IMMUNOMODULA-
2921–7. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0371. PMID TORY EFFECTS” (PDF). J. Biol. Chem. 281 (20):
18025276. 14192–14206. doi:10.1074/jbc.M601074200. PMID
16547349.
[28] Ligresti, A.; Moriello, AS; Starowicz, K; Matias, I;
Pisanti, S; De Petrocellis, L; Laezza, C; Portella, G; [39] Perry, Nigel; Van Klink, John; Burgess, Elaine; Par-
Bifulco, M; Di Marzo, V (2006). “Antitumor Activ- menter, Graeme (2007). “Alkamide Levels inEchinacea
ity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect purpurea: A Rapid Analytical Method Revealing Differ-
of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma”. Jour- ences among Roots, Rhizomes, Stems, Leaves and Flow-
nal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 318 ers”. Planta Medica 63 (1): 58–62. doi:10.1055/s-2006-
(3): 1375–87. doi:10.1124/jpet.106.105247. PMID 957605. PMID 17252329.
16728591.
[40] He, X; Lin, L; Bernart, MW; Lian, L (1998). “Analysis
[29] “Marijuana Compound Fights Cancer; Human Trials of alkamides in roots and achenes of Echinacea purpurea
Next”. NBC Bay Area. by liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrome-
try”. Journal of Chromatography A 815 (2): 205–11.
[30] Mahadevan, Anu; Siegel, Craig; Martin, Billy R.; Abood, doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00447-6.
Mary E.; Beletskaya, Irina; Razdan, Raj K. (2000).
“Novel Cannabinol Probes for CB1 and CB2 Cannabi- [41] Ligresti, A.; Villano, R.; Allarà, M.; Ujváry, I. N.; Di
noid Receptors”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 43 (20): Marzo, V. (2012). “Kavalactones and the endocannabi-
3778–85. doi:10.1021/jm0001572. PMID 11020293. noid system: The plant-derived yangonin is a novel CB1
1.8. FURTHER READING 9
receptor ligand”. Pharmacological Research 66 (2): 163– [52] Hanuš, Lumír; Abu-Lafi, Saleh; Fride, Ester; Breuer,
169. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.04.003. PMID 22525682. Aviva; Vogel, Zvi; Shalev, Deborah E.; Kustanovich,
Irina; Mechoulam, Raphael (2001). “2-Arachidonyl glyc-
[42] Korte, G.; Dreiseitel, A.; Schreier, P.; Oehme, A.;
eryl ether, an endogenous agonist of the cannabinoid CB1
Locher, S.; Geiger, S.; Heilmann, J.; Sand, P.G.
receptor”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci-
(2010). “Tea catechins’ affinity for human cannabi-
ences 98 (7): 3662–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.061029898.
noid receptors”. Phytomedicine 17 (1): 19–22.
PMC 31108. PMID 11259648.
doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2009.10.001. PMID 19897346.
[53] Oka, Saori; Tsuchie, Akiko; Tokumura, Akira; Mu-
[43] Gertsch, J; Leonti, M; Raduner, S; Racz, I; Chen, J;
ramatsu, Mayumi; Suhara, Yoshitomo; Takayama, Hi-
Xie, X; Altmann, K; Karsak, M; Zimmer, A (2008).
roaki; Waku, Keizo; Sugiura, Takayuki (2003). “Ether-
“Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid”. PNAS 105
linked analogue of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (noladin ether)
(26): 9099–9104. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803601105. PMC
was not detected in the brains of various mammalian
2449371. PMID 18574142.
species”. Journal of Neurochemistry 85 (6): 1374–
[44] Ashton CH (February 2001). “Pharmacology and effects 81. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01804.x. PMID
of cannabis: a brief review”. Br J Psychiatry 178 (2): 12787057.
101–106. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.101. PMID 11157422.
“Because they are extremely lipid soluble, cannabinoids [54] Bisogno, Tiziana; Melck, Dominique; Bobrov, Mikhail
accumulate in fatty tissues, reaching peak concentrations Yu.; Gretskaya, Natalia M.; Bezuglov, Vladimir V.;
in 4-5 days. They are then slowly released back into other De Petrocellis, Luciano; Di Marzo, Vincenzo (2000).
body compartments, including the brain. They are then “N-acyl-dopamines: Novel synthetic CB1 cannabinoid-
slowly released back into other body compartments, in- receptor ligands and inhibitors of anandamide inactiva-
cluding the brain. Because of the sequestration in fat, the tion with cannabimimetic activity in vitro and in vivo”.
tissue elimination half-life of THC is about 7 days, and Biochemical Journal 351 (3): 817–24. doi:10.1042/0264-
complete elimination of a single dose may take up to 30 6021:3510817. PMC 1221424. PMID 11042139.
days.” [55] Bisogno, T; Ligresti, A; Dimarzo, V (2005). “The en-
[45] Grotenhermen, Franjo (2005). “Cannabinoids”. Current docannabinoid signalling system: Biochemical aspects”.
Drug Target -CNS & Neurological Disorders 4 (5): 507. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 81 (2): 224–
doi:10.2174/156800705774322111. 38. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.027. PMID 15935454.
[46] Martin, B.R.; Mechoulam, R.; Razdan, R.K. (1999). [56] Ralevic, Vera (2003). “Cannabinoid modulation of
“Discovery and characterization of endogenous cannabi- peripheral autonomic and sensory neurotransmission”.
noids”. Life Sciences 65 (6–7): 573. doi:10.1016/S0024- European Journal of Pharmacology 472 (1–2): 1–21.
3205(99)00281-7. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01813-2. PMID 12860468.
[47] Di Tomaso, Emmanuelle; Beltramo, Massimiliano; Pi- [57] Porter, A. C.; Sauer, JM; Knierman, MD; Becker, GW;
omelli, Daniele (1996). “Brain cannabinoids in choco- Berna, MJ; Bao, J; Nomikos, GG; Carter, P; Bymaster,
late”. Nature 382 (6593): 677–8. doi:10.1038/382677a0. FP; Leese, AB; Felder, CC (2002). “Characterization
PMID 8751435. of a Novel Endocannabinoid, Virodhamine, with Antag-
onist Activity at the CB1 Receptor”. Journal of Pharma-
[48] Chapman, K. D.; Venables, B; Markovic, R; Blair Jr, RW;
cology and Experimental Therapeutics 301 (3): 1020–4.
Bettinger, C (1999). “N-Acylethanolamines in Seeds.
doi:10.1124/jpet.301.3.1020. PMID 12023533.
Quantification of Molecular Species and Their Degrada-
tion upon Imbibition”. Plant Physiology 120 (4): 1157– [58] Piñeiro, Roberto; Falasca, Marco (2012). “Lysophos-
64. doi:10.1104/pp.120.4.1157. PMC 59349. PMID phatidylinositol signalling: New wine from an old bot-
10444099. tle”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molec-
[49] Sepe, Nunzio; De Petrocellis, Luciano; Montanaro, ular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1821 (4): 694–705.
Francesca; Cimino, Guido; Di Marzo, Vincenzo (1998). doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.01.009. PMID 22285325.
“Bioactive long chain N-acylethanolamines in five species [59] Fride, E; Bregman, T; Kirkham, TC (2005). “Endo-
of edible bivalve molluscs”. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta cannabinoids and food intake: Newborn suckling and ap-
(BBA) – Lipids and Lipid Metabolism 1389 (2): 101–11. petite regulation in adulthood”. Experimental biology and
doi:10.1016/S0005-2760(97)00132-X. PMID 9461251. medicine 230 (4): 225–34. PMID 15792943.
[50] Piomelli, Daniele; Schweitzer, Nephi; Piomelli, Paul
[60] “More medicinal uses for marijuana”. Marijuana.org.
(1997). “A second endogenous cannabinoid that modu-
October 18, 2005. Archived from the original on 2005-
lates long-term potentiation”. Nature 388 (6644): 773–8.
12-21. Retrieved 2014-01-15.
doi:10.1038/42015. PMID 9285589.
[51] Savinainen, Juha R; Järvinen, Tomi; Laine, Krista; Laiti-
nen, Jarmo T (2001). “Despite substantial degradation, 2-
arachidonoylglycerol is a potent full efficacy agonist medi-
1.8 Further reading
ating CB1receptor-dependent G-protein activation in rat
cerebellar membranes”. British Journal of Pharmacol- • De Meijer, EP; Bagatta, M; Carboni, A; Crucitti, P;
ogy 134 (3): 664–72. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704297. PMC Moliterni, VM; Ranalli, P et al. (2003). “The inher-
1572991. PMID 11588122. itance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L”.
10 CHAPTER 1. CANNABINOID
Genetics 163 (1): 335–46. PMC 1462421. PMID • Racz, I.; Nadal, X.; Alferink, J.; Baños, J. E.;
12586720. Rehnelt, J.; Martín, M. et al. (2008). “Crucial Role
of CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor in the Regulation
• Devane, W.; Hanus, L; Breuer, A; Pertwee, R.; of Central Immune Responses during Neuropathic
Stevenson, L.; Griffin, G et al. (1992). “Isolation Pain”. Journal of Neuroscience 28 (46): 12125–35.
and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3400-08.2008. PMC
cannabinoid receptor”. Science 258 (5090): 1946– 3844839. PMID 19005077.
9. doi:10.1126/science.1470919. PMID 1470919.
• Turner, C. E.; Mole, M. L.; Hanus, L.; Elsohly, H.
• Elsohly, Mahmoud A.; Slade, Desmond (2005). N. (1981). “Constituents of Cannabis sativa. XIX.
“Chemical constituents of marijuana: The com- Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Cannabiglen-
plex mixture of natural cannabinoids”. Life Sciences dol, A Novel Cannabinoid from an Indian Vari-
78 (5): 539–48. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.011. ant”. Journal of Natural Products 44 (1): 27–33.
PMID 16199061. doi:10.1021/np50013a005.
• Hanus, Lumir; Gopher, Asher; Almog, Shlomo;
Mechoulam, Raphael (1993). “Two new un-
saturated fatty acid ethanolamides in brain 1.9 External links
that bind to the cannabinoid receptor”. Jour-
nal of Medicinal Chemistry 36 (20): 3032–4. 1.9.1 Cannabinoid information
doi:10.1021/jm00072a026. PMID 8411021.
• Hanus, L (1987). “Biogenesis of cannabinoid sub- • Bela Szabo: Pharmacology of Cannabinoid Recep-
stances in the plant”. Acta Universitatis Palackianae tors BIOTREND Reviews No. 02, February 2008
Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae 116: 47–53. PMID • Marijuana and Medicine – Assessing the Science
2962461. Base (Institute of Medicine) – 1999 at National
• Hanuš, L.; Krejčí, Z. (1975). “Isolation of two Academies Press
new cannabinoid acids from Cannabis sativa L. of • House of Lords Report – Cannabis (United King-
Czechoslovak origin”. Acta Univ. Olomuc., Fac. dom) – 1998 at Parliament of the United Kingdom
Med 74: 161–166.
• Cannabis: A Health Perspective and Research
• Hanuš, L.; Krejčí, Z.; Hruban, L. (1975). “Isola- Agenda – 1997 at World Health Organization
tion of cannabidiolic acid from Turkish variety of
cannabis cultivated for fibre”. Acta Univ. Olomuc., • Chemical Ecology of Cannabis (J. Intl. Hemp Assn.
Fac. Med 74: 167–172. - 1994)
• Köfalvi, Attila, ed. (2008). “Cannabinoids and • THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) accumulation in glands
the Brain”. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74349-3. ISBN of Cannabis (Cannabaceae)
978-0-387-74348-6.
• Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new thera-
• Mechoulam, Raphael; Ben-Shabat, Shimon; Hanus, peutic opportunities from an ancient herb
Lumir; Ligumsky, Moshe; Kaminski, Norbert E.;
Schatz, Anthony R. et al. (1995). “Identifica-
tion of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present 1.9.2 Cannabinoid research organizations
in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid recep-
tors”. Biochemical Pharmacology 50 (1): 83– • International Cannabinoid Research Society
90. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(95)00109-D. PMID • The Canadian Consortium for the Investigation of
7605349. Cannabinoids
• Nicoll, Roger A.; Alger, Bradley E. (2004). “The • Therapeutic Potential in Spotlight at Cannabinoid
Brain’s Own Marijuana”. Scientific American 291 Researchers’ Meeting at California Cannabis Re-
(6): 68–75. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1204- search Medical Group
68. PMID 15597982.
• Racz, I.; Nadal, X.; Alferink, J.; Baños, J. E.;
Rehnelt, J.; Martín, M. et al. (2008). “Interferon-
is a Critical Modulator of CB2 Cannabinoid
Receptor Signaling during Neuropathic Pain”.
Journal of Neuroscience 28 (46): 12136–45.
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3402-08.2008. PMC
3844840. PMID 19005078.
Chapter 2
Entourage effect
2.2 References
[1] Lee, Martin A. (Sep 13, 2013). Smoke Signals: A Social
History of Marijuana-Medical, Recreational and Scientific.
Scribner. p. 465. ISBN 978-1439102619.
[2] Ben-Shabat, Shimon (July 17, 1998). “An entourage
effect: inactive endogenous fatty acid glycerol esters
enhance 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol cannabinoid activity”.
European Journal of Pharmacology 353 (1): 23–31.
doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00392-6.
[3] Andersson, Karl-Erik (Feb 4, 2011). Urinary Tract.
eBook: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 438.
[4] Newnes (March 5, 2010). Comprehensive Natural Prod-
ucts II: Chemistry and Biology:. eBook: Google. p. 220.
[5] Guy, Geoffrey William (July 1, 2004). The Medicinal
Uses of Cannabis and Cannabinoids (1st ed.). Pharma-
ceutical Press. p. 114. ISBN 978-0853695172.
[6] Castle, David (May 27, 2004). Marijuana and Madness:
Psychiatry and Neurobiology. eBook: Google. p. 8.
[7] Russo, Ethan B (Aug 2011). “Taming THC: poten-
tial cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid en-
tourage effects”. Br J Pharmacol 163 (7): 1344–1364.
doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x.
[8] Gardner, Fred (2011). “Terpenoids, 'minor' cannabi-
noids contribute to 'entourage effect' of Cannabis-based
medicines”. The Journal of Cannavis in Clinical Practice:
1.
11
Chapter 3
Synthetic cannabis
12
3.3. SAFETY 13
These more severe adverse effects in contrast to use of 3.5 Legal status
marijuana are believed to stem from the fact that many
of the synthetic cannabinoids are full agonists to the
3.5.1 Europe
cannabinoid receptors, CB1R and CB2R, compared to
THC which is only a partial agonist and thus not able
Austria The Austrian Ministry of Health announced on
to saturate and activate all of the receptor population no
[48] December 18, 2008 that Spice would be controlled
matter of dose and resulting concentration. It has also
under Paragraph 78 of their drug law on the grounds
been seen that phase 1 metabolism of JWH-018 results
that it contains an active substance that affects the
in at least nine monohydroxylated metabolites and with
functions of the body, and the legality of JWH-018
at least three of the metabolites shown to have full ago-
is under review.[55][56][57]
nistic effect on CB1R which compared to metabolism of
THC only results in one psychoactive monohydroxylated Germany JWH-018, CP 47,497 and the C6, C8 and C9
metabolite. This may further explain the increased toxi- homologues of CP 47,497 are illegal in Germany
city of synthetic cannabinoids compared to THC.[45] since January 22, 2009.[14][58]
Professor John W. Huffman, who first synthesised many
of the cannabinoids used in synthetic cannabis, is quoted Finland Spice blends are classified as a medicine in Fin-
as saying, “People who use it are idiots.”[36] “You don't land, and, therefore, it is illegal to order them with-
know what it’s going to do to you.”[49] A user who con- out a prescription. In practice, it is not possible to
sumed 3 g of Spice Gold every day for several months get a prescription.
showed withdrawal symptoms, similar to those associ-
ated with withdrawing from the use of narcotics. Doc- France JWH-018, CP 47,497 (and its homologues) and
tors treating the user also noted that his use of the HU-210 were all made illegal in France on February
product showed signs associated with addiction. [50]
One 24, 2009.[59]
case has been reported wherein a user, who had previ-
ously suffered from cannabis-induced recurrent psychotic Ireland From June 2010, JWH-018, along [60]
with a variety
episodes, suffered reactivation of his symptoms after of other designer drugs, is illegal.
using Spice. Psychiatrists treating him have suggested
Latvia JWH-018, JWH-073, CP 47,497 (and its homo-
that the lack of an antipsychotic chemical, similar to
logues) and HU-210 are all banned in Latvia as well
cannabidiol found in natural cannabis, may make syn-
as leonotis leonurus.[61]
thetic cannabis more likely to induce psychosis than nat-
ural cannabis.[51] Poland JWH-018 and many of the herbs mentioned on
Studies are currently available which suggest an asso- the ingredient lists of Spice and similar prepara-
ciation between synthetic cannabinoids and psychosis. tions were made illegal in May 2009. The bill was
Physicians should be aware that the use of synthetic passed by Polish Sejm,[62][63] Polish Senat[64] and
cannabinoids can be associated with psychosis and in- was signed by the President.[65]
vestigate possible use of synthetic cannabinoids in pa-
tients with inexplicable psychotic symptoms. In contrast Romania Spice was made illegal in Romania on Febru-
to most other recreational drugs, the dramatic psychotic ary 15, 2010.[66]
state induced by use of synthetic cannabinoids has been
reported in multiple cases to persist for several weeks, Russia On April 9, 2009, the Chief Medical Officer of
and in one case for seven months, after complete cessa- the Russian Federation issued a resolution on re-
[52]
tion of drug use. Individuals with risk factors for psy- inforcing control over the sales of smoking blends.
chotic disorders should be counseled against using syn- These blends, marketed under the trade names AM-
thetic cannabinoids. [53] HI-CO, Dream, Spice (Gold, Diamond), Zoom, Ex-
ses, Yucatán Fire and others, have been declared
to contain Salvia divinorum, Hawaiian Wood Rose,
and Blue Lotus, and are prohibited to be sold. These
substances have been found to have “psychotropic,
3.4 Drug testing narcotic effects, contain poisonous components and
represent potential threat for humans”. The resolu-
Spice does not cause a positive drug test for cannabis tion does not mention JWH-018 or other synthetic
or other illegal drugs using GC-MS-screening with cannabinoids.[67] On January 14, 2010, the Russian
library search, multi-target screening by LC-MS/MS, government issued a statement including 23 syn-
or immunological screening procedures.[22][50] A study thetic cannabinoids found in smoking blends Hawai-
has been conducted into the detection of metabolites of ian Rose and Blue Lotus on the list of prohibited
JWH-018 in urine; the metabolites are mainly conjugates narcotic and psychotropic substances. Thus, all of
with glucuronic acid and can be reliably detected by GC– these plants and compounds are now illegal in the
MS/MS and LC–MS/MS.[54] Russian Federation.[68]
3.5. LEGAL STATUS 15
Slovakia Spice is legal in Slovakia. The National Anti- passed on September 18, 2013 that bans entire fam-
Drug Unit is considering adding it to the list of con- ilies of synthetic drugs instead of only banning exist-
trolled substances.[69] The latest anti-drug law ver- ing compounds that have been identified.[82][83] The
sion (468/2009) valid since January 2010 still does introduction of this law makes NSW the first state
not mention active compounds of Spice.[70] in Australia to completely ban substances with psy-
choactive properties.[83]
Sweden CP 47,497-C6, CP 47,497-C7, CP 47,497-C8,
CP 47,497-C9, JWH-018, JWH-073 and HU-210
were all made illegal in Sweden on September 15, New Zealand Spice is illegal in New Zealand,[84]
it is clas-
2009. The bill was accepted on July 30, 2009 and sified as a Class C controlled drug. The New
was put in effect on September 15, 2009.[71] Zealand Parliament passed a law in July 2013 ban-
ning the sale of legal highs in dairies and supermar-
Switzerland Spice has been banned in Switzerland.[72] kets, but allowing some “low risk” drugs to continue
to be sold through speciality licensed shops.[85] Syn-
Turkey Spice a.k.a Bonzai added to the list of drugs thetic cannabinoids, as well as all other 'legal highs’
and psychotropic substances in 07.01.2011 by the were outlawed at midnight on 7 May 2014, after a
law which numbered as 2011/1310 B.K.K. (Febru- law was passed a week prior by the New Zealand
ary 13, 2011 and the Official Gazette No. 27845) government.[86]
[73]
3.5.2 South America Spice and specific forms of JWHxxx are not specifically
prohibited in Canada, but synthetic cannabis is listed as a
Chile The Chilean Ministry of Health on April 24, schedule II drug.[87][88] Health Canada is debating on the
2009 declared the sale of synthetic cannabis to be subject.[89][90]
illegal.[75]
United States
3.5.3 Asia
See also: JWH-018 § United States
South Korea South Korea officially added JWH-018,
CP 47,497 and HU-210 to the controlled substance The case of David Mitchell Rozga, an American teenager
list on July 1, 2009, effectively making these chem- from Indianola, Iowa, United States, brought interna-
icals illegal.[76] tional attention to K2. Rozga shot himself in the head
Japan Japan has banned JWH-018, CP 47, 497, and ho- with a family owned hunting rifle in an apparent suicide
mologues, and HU-210 since October 2009 in June 6, 2010. After news of Rozga’s death, it was re-
ported by friends that they had smoked K2 with Rozga
United Arab Emirates The United Arab Emirates had approximately one hour before his death. The nature of
stated that Spice was an illegal substance and posses- his death and reports from numerous family members,
sion or intent to sell would be a jailable offense.[77] had led investigators to believe that it was likely Rozga
was under the influence of a mind-altering substance, at
the time of his death. The death of Rozga has been used
3.5.4 Australasia as a face of political lobbying against the continuation of
K2, and other legal synthetic drugs, such as bath salts.[91]
Australia On June 17, 2011, the Western Australian
government banned all of the synthetic cannabi- Following the incident, an act to ban the use and distribu-
noids found in already existing products, including tion of the drug was proposed by the US Senator Chuck
brands such as Kronic, Kalma, Voodoo, Kaos, and Grassley of Iowa as the David Mitchell Rozga Act. It was
Mango Kush. Western Australia was the first state approved into [92] legislation by the United States Congress
in Australia to prohibit the sale of certain synthetic in June 2011. On July 10, 2012, President Barack
cannabinoids. [78][79]
On June 18, 2013, an interim Obama signed the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act
ban made a large list of product brands and synthetic of 2012 into law. It banned synthetic compounds com-
substances illegal to sell anywhere in Australia. [80] monly found in synthetic marijuana, placing them under
This ban lapsed on October 13, 2013, and a per- Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act.[7]
manent ban has not been imposed.[81] Synthetic Prior to that, some compounds within synthetic cannabis
cannabis remains illegal in NSW, where a bill was (HU-210) were scheduled in the USA under federal law,
16 CHAPTER 3. SYNTHETIC CANNABIS
[6] Citing Imminent Hazard to Public Safety, DEA Tem- [23] Emanuel, C. E. J.; Ellison, B.; Banks, C. E. (2010).
porarily Places Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I “Spice up your life: screening the illegal components of
‘Spice’ herbal products”. Analytical Methods 2 (6): 614.
[7] Vashi, Sonam (September 26, 2012). K2 Trend Not Slow- doi:10.1039/c0ay00200c.
ing Down WebMD Medical News via KOKI-TV
[24] Stafford, Ned. Synthetic Cannabis Mimic Found in
[8] http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/03/30/ Herbal Incense. Royal Society of Chemistry: Chemistry
149679528/new-york-bans-synthetic-marijuana World. January 15, 2009. Accessed: June 17, 2010
[9] www.emed-journal.com Lapoint J, Nelson LS. Synthetic [25] Kikura-Hanajiri, R.; Uchiyama, N.; Goda, Y. (2011).
Cannabinoids: The Newest, Almost Illicit Drug of Abuse. “Survey of current trends in the abuse of psychotropic
Emergency Medicine 2011;43(2):26-28 substances and plants in Japan”. Legal Medicine 13 (3):
109–115. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.02.003. PMID
[10] Cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids, and psychosis risk: 21377397.
What the evidence says
[26] Uchiyama, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-Hanajiri, R.;
[11] Synthetic Cannabis May Pose an Even Greater Psychosis Goda, Y. (2012). “URB-754: A new class of de-
Risk signer drug and 12 synthetic cannabinoids detected in il-
legal products”. Forensic Science International 227 (1–
[12] 19, 2009.19/ Hauptwirkstoff von “Spice Girl” identi-
3): 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.047. PMID
fiziert. W was here. January 19, 2009 (German)
23063179.
[13] “Modedroge “Spice” ist verboten!" (in German).
[27] Uchiyama, N.; Matsuda, S.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-
Bmg.bund.de. March 10, 2009. Retrieved August 24,
Hanajiri, R.; Goda, Y. (2013). “Two new-type
2010.
cannabimimetic quinolinyl carboxylates, QUPIC and
[14] BGBl I Nr. 3 vom January 21, 2009, 22. BtMÄndV vom QUCHIC, two new cannabimimetic carboxamide deriva-
19. Jan 2009, S. 49–50. tives, ADB-FUBINACA and ADBICA, and five synthetic
cannabinoids detected with a thiophene derivative α-PVT
[15] Uchiyama N, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Ogata J, Goda and an opioid receptor agonist AH-7921 identified in ille-
Y (May 2010). “Chemical analysis of synthetic gal products”. Forensic Toxicology. doi:10.1007/s11419-
cannabinoids as designer drugs in herbal products”. 013-0182-9.
Forensic Science International 198 (1–3): 31–8.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.004. PMID 20117892. [28] Whitworth, Chris (July 7, 2011). “Kronic ingredients
secret to stop industry 'cowboys’". 3 News. Retrieved
[16] “Gefährlicher Kick mit Spice (German)". Fr-online.de. November 16, 2011.
Retrieved August 24, 2010.
[29] 'Herbal High' synthetic Cannabinoid composition, re-
[17] “Erstmals Bestandteile der Modedroge “Spice” leased by ESR July 2011. (PDF) . Retrieved on August
nachgewiesen (German)". Haz.de. Retrieved Au- 7, 2011.
gust 24, 2010.
[30] Temporary Class Drug Notices. New Zealand Ministry of
[18] “Spice enthält chemischen Wirkstoff (German)". Health
Badische-zeitung.de. Retrieved August 24, 2010. [31] Conviction for sale of herbal smoking material contain-
[19] Schifano, F.; Corazza, O.; Deluca, P.; Davey, Z.; Di Furia, ing a prescription medicine. MedSafe Media release, 28
L.; Farre', M.; Flesland, L.; Mannonen, M.; Pagani, S.; March 2013
Peltoniemi, T.; Pezzolesi, C.; Scherbaum, N.; Siemann, [32] Aung, M. M.; Griffin, G.; Huffman, J. W.; Wu, M. J.;
H.; Skutle, A.; Torrens, M.; Van Der Kreeft, P. (2009). Keel, C.; Yang, B.; Showalter, V. M.; Abood, M. E.; Mar-
“Psychoactive drug or mystical incense? Overview of the tin, B. R. (2000). “Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length
online available information on Spice products”. Interna- of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB1 and CB2 receptor
tional Journal of Culture and Mental Health 2 (2): 137. binding”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 60 (2): 133–140.
doi:10.1080/17542860903350888. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00152-0. PMID 10940540.
[20] “Spice” – Plant material(s) laced with synthetic cannabi- [33] Devane, W. A., et al. (1992). “A novel probe for the
noids or cannabinoid mimicking compounds (U.S. Drug cannabinoid receptor”. Journal of Medical Chemistry 35
Enforcement Administration) (11): 2065–2069. doi:10.1021/jm00089a018. PMID
1317925.
[21] Lindigkeit, Rainer; Boehme, A; Eiserloh, I; Luebbecke,
M; Wiggermann, M; Ernst, L; Beuerle, T (Octo- [34] Compton, D.; Johnson, M.; Melvin, L.; Martin, B. (1992).
ber 30, 2009). “Spice: A never-ending story?". “Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabi-
Forensic Science International 191 (1): 58–63. noid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents”.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.008. PMID 19589652. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Thera-
peutics 260 (1): 201–209. PMID 1309872.
[22] Auwärter, V., et al. (2009). "'Spice' and other herbal
blends: harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs?". [35] WO patent 200128557, Makriyannis A, Deng H,
Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS 44 (5): 832–837. “Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted June 7,
doi:10.1002/jms.1558. PMID 19189348. Free version 2001
18 CHAPTER 3. SYNTHETIC CANNABIS
[36] “Fake pot that acts real stymies law enforcement”. As- [49] “Fake Weed, Real Drug: K2 Causing Hallucinations in
sociated Press. February 17, 2010. Retrieved April 21, Teens”. LiveScience. Retrieved November 24, 2010.
2010.
[50] Zimmermann, U., et al. (2009). “Withdrawal phe-
[37] Mir, A; Obafemi, A; Young, A; Kane, C (December nomena and dependence syndrome after the consumption
2011). “Myocardial infarction associated with use of the of “spice gold"". Deutsches Arzteblatt international 106
synthetic cannabinoid k2.”. Pediatrics 128 (6): e1622–7. (27): 464–467. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0464. PMC
doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3823. PMID 22065271. 2719097. PMID 19652769.
[38] Schneir, AB; Baumbacher, T (December 13, 2011). [51] Müller, H.; Sperling, W.; Köhrmann, M.; Huttner,
“Convulsions Associated with the Use of a Synthetic H.; Kornhuber, J.; Maler, J. (2010). “The syn-
Cannabinoid Product.”. Journal of Medical Toxicology thetic cannabinoid Spice as a trigger for an acute
8 (1): 62–4. doi:10.1007/s13181-011-0182-2. PMID exacerbation of cannabis induced recurrent psychotic
22160733. episodes”. Schizophrenia research 118 (1–3): 309–310.
doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.001. PMID 20056392.
[39] Jeanna Bryner (March 3, 2010). “Fake Weed, Real Drug:
K2 Causing hallucinations in Teens”. LiveScience. Re- [52] Hurst, D; Loeffler, G; McLay, R (October 2011). “Psy-
trieved April 21, 2010. chosis associated with synthetic cannabinoid agonists:
a case series.”. The American Journal of Psychiatry
[40] Vardakou, I; Pistos, C; Spiliopoulou, Ch (2010). “Spice 168 (10): 1119. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010176.
drugs as a new trend: Mode of action, identification PMID 21969050.
and legislation”. Toxicology Letters 197 (3): 157–62.
doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.06.002. PMID 20566335. [53] Every-Palmer, S (September 1, 2011). “Synthetic
cannabinoid JWH-018 and psychosis: an explorative
[41] Auwärter, V., et al. (2009). "'Spice' and other herbal
study.”. Drug and alcohol dependence 117 (2-3):
blends: harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs?".
152–7. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.012. PMID
Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS 44 (5): 832–837.
21316162.
doi:10.1002/jms.1558. PMID 19189348.
[54] Sobolevsky, T.; Prasolov, I.; Rodchenkov, G.
[42] Every-Palmer, S (2010). “Warning: Legal syn-
(2010). “Detection of JWH-018 metabolites
thetic cannabinoid-receptor agonists such as JWH-018
in smoking mixture post-administration urine”.
may precipitate psychosis in vulnerable individuals”.
Forensic Science International 200 (1–3): 141–147.
Addiction 105 (10): 1859–60. doi:10.1111/j.1360-
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.003. PMID 20430547.
0443.2010.03119.x. PMID 20840203.
[55] “Kräutermischung “Spice": Gesundheitsministerium
[43] Müller, H.; Sperling, W.; Köhrmann, M.; Huttner,
stoppt Handel, December 18, 2008”. Derstandard.at.
H.; Kornhuber, J.; Maler, J. (2010). “The syn-
December 19, 2008. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
thetic cannabinoid Spice as a trigger for an acute
exacerbation of cannabis induced recurrent psychotic [56] (AFP) (December 18, 2008). “Austria bans herbal in-
episodes”. Schizophrenia research 118 (1–3): 309–310. cense 'Spice'". Google. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.001. PMID 20056392.
[57] “Gesundheitsministerium setzt Maßnahme zum Verbot
[44] “Legal highs linked to psychosis”. New Zealand Herald. von “Spice"". Bmgfj.gv.at. December 18, 2008. Re-
Apr 5, 2014. trieved June 19, 2010.
[45] Brents, L. K.; Reichard, E. E.; Zimmerman, S. M.; [58] “Betäubungsmittelrecht: Modedroge Spice wird per Eil-
Moran, J. H.; Fantegrossi, W. E.; Prather, P. L. (2011). verordnung verboten”. Der Spiegel. Retrieved June 19,
“Phase I hydroxylated metabolites of the K2 synthetic 2010.
cannabinoid JWH-018 retain in vitro and in vivo cannabi-
noid 1 receptor affinity and activity”. PLoS ONE 6 [59] “Arrêté du 24 février 2009 modifiant l’arrêté du 22 février
(7): e21917. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021917. PMC 1990 fixant la liste des substances classées comme stupé-
3130777. PMID 21755008. fiants”. Journal Officiel De La République Française.
February 27, 2009. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
[46] Coffman, K. (6 September 2013). “Colorado probes three
deaths possibly linked to synthetic marijuana”. Reuters [60] “Move on head shops 'not enough' – The Irish Times —
(Denver). Retrieved 30 January 2014. Wed, Mar 3, 2010”. The Irish Times. March 3, 2010.
Retrieved August 24, 2010.
[47] Taylor, V. (14 September 2013). “Teen makes miraculous
progress nine months after synthetic marijuana nearly kills [61] “Noteikumi par Latvijā kontrolējamajām narkotiskajām
her”. NY Daily News. Retrieved 30 January 2014. vielām, psihotropajām vielām un prekursoriem” (in Lat-
vian). likumi.lv. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
[48] Fantegrossi, W. E.; Moran, J. H.; Radominska-Pandya,
A; Prather, P. L. (2014). “Distinct pharmacology and [62] http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki6ka.nsf/wgdruku/1547
metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to
Δ9 -THC: Mechanism underlying greater toxicity?". Life [63] mm, PAP (February 12, 2009). “Sejm za delegalizacją
Sciences 97 (1): 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2013.09.017. 'dopalaczy'". Wiadomosci.gazeta.pl. Retrieved June 19,
PMID 24084047. 2010.
3.7. REFERENCES 19
[64] “Senat poparł ustawę zakazującą handlu “dopalaczami” – [82] “NSW law to ban synthetic drugs passed”. September 18,
Wiadomości — WP.PL”. Wiadomosci.wp.pl. Retrieved 2013. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
June 19, 2010.
[83] Coultan, Mark (September 10, 2013). “NSW law to ban
[65] http://www.prezydent.pl/x.node?id=26543130 synthetic drugs to stop 'legal highs’". The Australian. Re-
trieved October 28, 2013.
[66] “OUG 6/2010 pentru modificarea si completarea Legii nr.
143/2000 privind prevenirea si combaterea traficului si [84] “Cannabis substitute “Spice” now illegal”. TVNZ. April
consumului ilicit de droguri si pentru completarea Legii 1, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2011.
nr. 339/2005 privind regimul juridic al plantelor, substan-
telor si preparatelor stupefiante si psihotrope. Ordonanta [85] Heather, Ben (October 6, 2013). “Kronic king gets the
de urgenta nr. 6/2010”. Dreptonline.ro. August 3, 2000. green light”. Retrieved October 28, 2013.
Retrieved June 19, 2010.
[86] “Legal highs banned from midnight”. May 7, 2014. Re-
[67] "О запрещении реализации продукции с содержанием trieved May 8, 2014.
шалфея предсказателей, гавайской розы и голубого
лотоса". Rospotrebnadzor.ru. Retrieved June 19, 2010. [87] “Controlled Drugs and Substances Act”.
Laws.justice.gc.ca. November 15, 2010. Retrieved
[68] "Постановление от 31 декабря 2009 г. № 1186 November 24, 2010.
О внесении изменений в некоторые постановления
Правительства Российской Федерации по вопросам, [88] “Consolidated Index of Drugs and Substances”. Iso-
связанным с оборотом наркотических средств". Gov- merdesign.com. April 24, 2010. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
ernment.ru. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
[89] “Ian Bussières : Le spice: la capitale craque pour les
[69] “Po ketamíne by sa mala zakázať bylinná zmes Spice”. “herbes magiques” | Société". Cyberpresse.ca. Retrieved
SME.sk. Retrieved June 19, 2010. June 19, 2010.
[73] “Sentetik Cannabinoid (Bonzai)". www. [93] “HU-210”. USDOJ.gov. Retrieved September 16, 2010.
uyusturucumaddeler.com. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
[94] Cook, Morgan (February 28, 2011). “Synthetic marijuana
[74] Portal, Gaetan (December 23, 2009). "'Legal high' drugs illegal as of Tuesday”. North County Times (San Diego).
banned in UK”. BBC News. Retrieved May 23, 2010. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
[77] Dubai Customs foil 126 attempts to smuggle narcotic [97] Donna Leinwand (May 24, 2010). 24, 2010-k2_N.htm
“Places race to outlaw K2 'Spice' drug”. USA Today. Re-
[78] Jerga, Josh (June 13, 2011). “Fake cannabis to be out- trieved July 26, 2010.
lawed in WA”. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved
June 15, 2011. [98] Meserve, Jeanne (February 28, 2011). “DEA imposes
“emergency” ban to control synthetic marijuana”. CNN.
[79] O'Brien, Amanda (April 11, 2011). “Miners working high Retrieved March 1, 2011.
on synthetic grass”. The Australian. Retrieved April 17,
2011. [99] Ben Paynter: The Big Business of Synthetic Highs,
Bloomerg Businessweek June, 2011
[80] Bradbury, David (June 18, 2013). “Competition and Con-
sumer Act 2010 - Consumer Protection Notice No. 3 of [100] The Associated Press. How major issues fared in Kansas
2013 - Imposition of Interim Ban on Certain Consumer Legislature. CNBC. May 23, 2010. Accessed: May 23,
Goods Containing Synthetic Drug Substances”. Retrieved 2010
October 28, 2013.
[101] Simmons, Andria (May 24, 2010). “Governor signs bill
[81] “Synthetic drug substances - national interim ban”. to outlaw synthetic marijuana”. ajc.com. Retrieved June
ACCC. Retrieved October 28, 2013. 19, 2010.
20 CHAPTER 3. SYNTHETIC CANNABIS
[102] May 20, 2010 (May 20, 2010). “Alabama Coalition Gets [120] Meserve, Jeanne (February 28, 2011). “DEA imposes
Salvia and K2 Banned in Their State”. CADCA. Re- “emergency” ban to control synthetic marijuana”. CNN.
trieved August 24, 2010. Retrieved March 1, 2011.
[103] Haas, Brian. 'K2', 'K3' synthetic drugs are illegal in TN [121] Schlabach, Mark (October 20, 2011). “Sources: LSU
starting July 1. The Tennessean. May 30, 2010. Ac- players had positive tests”. ESPN.com. Retrieved Novem-
cessed: June 17, 2010 ber 4, 2011.
[104] Gay, Malcolm. (2010-07-10) Synthetic Marijuana Spurs [122] Spice Report Psychonaut Web Mapping Research Project
State Bans. New York Times. Retrieved on August 7,
2011. [123] “The story of Spice”. Financial Times. February 13,
2009. Retrieved September 19, 2010.
[105] Iowa Code § 124.204(4)(u) (defining a Schedule I con-
trolled substance to include “synthetic equivalents of the [124] Winstock, A.; Mitcheson, L.; Deluca, P.; Davey, Z.;
substances contained in the Cannabis plant, or in the Corazza, O.; Schifano, F. (2010). “Mephedrone, new
resinous extractives of such plant, and synthetic sub- kid for the chop?". Addiction (Abingdon, England) 106
stances, derivatives, and their isomers with similar chem- (1): 154–161. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03130.x.
ical structure and pharmacological activity to those sub- PMID 20735367.
stances contained in the plant....”)
[125] K2 – Spice via Partnership at Drugfree.org
[106] Gavin Lesnick (July 2, 2010). “Beebe signs emer-
gency ban on K2”. Arkansas Online (Arkansas Democrat
Gazette). Retrieved July 26, 2010. 3.8 External links
[107] “Synthetic Cannabis — Controlled Substance Informa-
tion”. Retrieved October 16, 2010. • Erowid
[108] Daniel Martynowicz. “Illinois Bans Synthetic Cannabi- • Synthetic cannabinoid profile European Monitoring
noids”. Retrieved September 14, 2010. Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
[109] http://www.michigan.gov/lara/0,4601,7-154-10573_
11472-280858--,00.html
[111] http://www.in.gov/attorneygeneral/2974.htm
4-HTMPIPO
• UR-144
• XLR-11
4.2 References
[1] Kavanagh, P.; Grigoryev, A.; Savchuk, S.; Mikhura, I.;
Formanovsky, A. (2013). “UR-144 in products soldviathe
Internet: Identification of related compounds and charac-
terization of pyrolysis products”. Drug Testing and Anal-
ysis: n/a. doi:10.1002/dta.1456.
21
Chapter 5
5F-PB-22
• QUCHIC
• QUPIC
• SDB-001
5.2 References
[1] 5F-PB-22 page on Forendex
22
Chapter 6
A-40174
6.2 References
[1] Reggio, Patricia H., ed. (2009). “The Cannabinoid Re-
ceptors”. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-503-9. ISBN 978-1-
58829-712-9.
23
Chapter 7
A-41988
7.2 References
[1] Winn, M.; Arendsen, D.; Dodge, P.; Dren, A.; Dun-
nigan, D.; Hallas, R.; Hwang, K.; Kyncl, J.; Lee,
Y. H.; Plotnikoff, N.; Young, P.; Zaugg, H. (1976).
“Drugs derived from cannabinoids. 5. Delta6a,10a-
Tetrahydrocannabinol and heterocyclic analogs containing
aromatic side chains”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
19 (4): 461–471. doi:10.1021/jm00226a003. PMID
817021.
24
Chapter 8
A-796,260
• A-836,339
• JWH-200
• UR-144
• XLR-11
8.2 References
[1] Frost, J. M., et al. (2010). “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl Ketones:
Effects of N1 Substituted Indole Side Chain Variations on
CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Activity”. Journal of Medic-
inal Chemistry 53 (1): 295. doi:10.1021/jm901214q.
PMID 19921781.
[2] Yao BB, et al. (January 2008). “In vitro and in vivo char-
acterization of A-796260: a selective cannabinoid CB2
receptor agonist exhibiting analgesic activity in rodent
pain models”. British Journal of Pharmacology 153 (2):
390–401. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707568. PMC 2219533.
PMID 17994110.
25
Chapter 9
A-834,735
A-834,735 is a drug developed by Abbott Laborato- [3] Chin CL, et al. (January 2008). “Differential effects of
ries that acts as a potent cannabinoid receptor full cannabinoid receptor agonists on regional brain activity
agonist at both the CB1 and CB2 receptors, with using pharmacological MRI”. British Journal of Phar-
a Kᵢ of 12nM at CB1 and 0.21nM at CB2 . Re- macology 153 (2): 367–79. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707506.
placing the aromatic 3-benzoyl or 3-naphthoyl group PMC 2219521. PMID 17965748.
found in most indole derived cannabinoids, with the 3- [4] Frost, J. M., et al. (2008). “Indol-3-yl-
tetramethylcyclopropylmethanone group of A-834,735 tetramethylcyclopropyl Ketones: Effects of Indole
and related compounds, imparts significant selectivity for Ring Substitution on CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Ac-
CB2 , with most compounds from this group found to be tivity”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 51 (6): 1904.
highly selective CB2 agonists with little affinity for CB1 . doi:10.1021/jm7011613. PMID 18311894.
However low nanomolar CB1 binding affinity is retained
[5] Frost, J. M., et al. (2010). “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl Ketones:
with certain heterocyclic 1-position substituents such as Effects of N1 Substituted Indole Side Chain Variations on
(N-methylpiperidin-2-yl)methyl (cf. AM-1220, AM- CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Activity”. Journal of Medic-
1248), or the (tetrahydropyran-4-yl)methyl substituent of inal Chemistry 53 (1): 295. doi:10.1021/jm901214q.
A-834,735, resulting in compounds that still show signif- PMID 19921781.
icant affinity and efficacy at both receptors despite being
CB2 selective overall.[1][2][3][4][5]
• AB-001
• JTE 7-31
• UR-144
• XLR-11
9.2 References
[1] Dart M, et al. (2006). 1-Alkyl-3-keto-indoles: identi-
fication and in vitro characterization of a series of po-
tent cannabinoid ligands. In 2006 Symposium on the
Cannabinoids. International Cannabinoid Research Soci-
ety: Burlington, VT.
26
Chapter 10
A-836,339
10.1 References
[1] McGaraughty, S., et al. (2009). “A CB(2) receptor ago-
nist, A-836339, modulates wide dynamic range neuronal
activity in neuropathic rats: contributions of spinal and pe-
ripheral CB(2) receptors”. Neuroscience 158 (4): 1652–
1661. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.015. PMID
19063946.
27
Chapter 11
AB-001
• RCS-4
• RCS-8
• SDB-001
• N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
• (1-Pentylindol-3-yl)-(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone
11.2 References
[1] Jankovics, P. T.; Váradi, A. S.; Tölgyesi, L. S.; Lohner,
S.; Németh-Palotás, J. L.; Balla, J. Z. (2012). “Detection
28
Chapter 12
AB-005
• AM-1248
• AM-1220
• JWH-018
• UR-144
• XLR-11
12.3 References
[1] Frost, J. M., et al. (2010). “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl Ketones:
Effects of N1 Substituted Indole Side Chain Variations on
CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Activity”. Journal of Medic-
inal Chemistry 53 (1): 295. doi:10.1021/jm901214q.
PMID 19921781.
29
Chapter 13
AB-CHMINACA
13.1 References
[1] AB-CHMINACA, Cayman Chemicals
30
Chapter 14
AB-FUBINACA
AB-FUBINACA is a drug that acts as a potent agonist [3] Behonick, G; Shanks, K. G.; Firchau, D. J.; Mathur, G;
for the cannabinoid receptors, with Kᵢ values of 0.9nM Lynch, C. F.; Nashelsky, M; Jaskierny, D. J.; Meroueh, C
at CB1 and 23.2nM at CB2 . It was originally developed (2014). “Four Postmortem Case Reports with Quantita-
by Pfizer in 2009 as an analgesic medication,[1] but was tive Detection of the Synthetic Cannabinoid, 5F-PB-22”.
never pursued for human use. Subsequently in 2012, this Journal of analytical toxicology. doi:10.1093/jat/bku048.
PMID 24876364.
compound was discovered as an ingredient in synthetic
cannabis blends in Japan,[2] along with a related com-
pound AB-PINACA which had not previously been re-
ported.
In January 2014, AB-FUBINACA was designated as a
Schedule I controlled substance in the United States.[3]
• ADB-FUBINACA
• ADBICA
• APICA
• APINACA
• Benzydamine
• NESS-040C5
• PF-03550096
14.2 References
[1] Buchler IP et al, INDAZOLE DERIVATIVES. WO
2009/106982
31
Chapter 15
AB-PINACA
• APINACA
• PF-03550096
15.2 References
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Matsuda, S.; Wakana, D.; Kikura-
Hanajiri, R.; Goda, Y. (2012). “New cannabimimetic
indazole derivatives, N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-
2-yl)−1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AB-
PINACA) and N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-
yl)−1-(4-fluorobenzyl)−1H-indazole-3-carboxamide
(AB-FUBINACA) identified as designer drugs in
illegal products”. Forensic Toxicology 31: 93.
doi:10.1007/s11419-012-0171-4.
32
Chapter 16
Abnormal cannabidiol
Abnormal cannabidiol (abn-cbd) is a synthetic the putative abnormal cannabidiol receptor”. BMC Neu-
regioisomer of cannabidiol, which unlike most other roscience 11: 44. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-44. PMC
cannabinoids produces vasodilator effects, lowers blood 2865488. PMID 20346144.
pressure, and induces cell migration, cell proliferation
[3] Jarai, Z. (1999). “Cannabinoid-induced mesenteric
and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vasodilation through an endothelial site distinct from
microglia, but without producing any psychoactive CB1 or CB2 receptors”. Proceedings of the Na-
effects.[1][2] It has been shown that the actions of abnor- tional Academy of Sciences 96 (24): 14136–14141.
mal cannabidiol are mediated through a site separate doi:10.1073/pnas.96.24.14136. PMC 24203. PMID
from the CB1 and CB2 receptors,[2][3] which responds 10570211.
to abnormal cannabidiol, O-1602, and the endogenous
ligands: anandamide (AEA), N-arachidonoyl glycine [4] Walter, L; Franklin, A; Witting, A; Wade, C; Xie, Y;
(NAGly) and N-arachidonoyl L-serine.[2][4][5][6] Multiple Kunos, G; MacKie, K; Stella, N (2003). “Nonpsy-
chotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell
lines of evidence support the proposed identification
migration”. Journal of Neuroscience 23 (4): 1398–1405.
of this novel target in microglia as the previously PMID 12598628.
“orphan” receptor GPR18.[2] Another possible tar-
get of abnormal cannabidiol is GPR55, which has [5] Offertáler, L; Mo, FM; Bátkai, S; Liu, J; Begg, M; Razdan,
also received much attention as a putative cannabinoid RK; Martin, BR; Bukoski, RD; Kunos, G (2003). “Selec-
receptor,[7][8] although a growing body of evidence points tive ligands and cellular effectors of a G protein-coupled
to lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) as the endogenous lig- endothelial cannabinoid receptor”. Molecular Pharmacol-
and for GPR55.[9][10] Further research suggests there are ogy 63 (3): 699–705. doi:10.1124/mol.63.3.699. PMID
yet more additional cannabinoid receptors.[11][12][13][14] 12606780.
[2] McHugh D, Hu SS, Rimmerman N, Juknat A, Vogil [9] Kapur, A; Zhao, P; Sharir, H; Bai, Y; Caron, MG; Barak,
Z, Walker JM, Bradshaw HB (March 2010). “N- LS; Abood, ME (2009). “Atypical Responsiveness of the
arachidonoyl glycine, an abundant endogenous lipid, po- Orphan Receptor GPR55 to Cannabinoid Ligands”. The
tently drives directed cellular migration through GPR18, Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 (43): 29817–29827.
33
34 CHAPTER 16. ABNORMAL CANNABIDIOL
[12] Johns, D. G.; Behm, D. J.; Walker, D. J.; Ao, Z.; Sha-
pland, E. M.; Daniels, D. A.; Riddick, M.; Dowell, S.;
Staton, P. C.; Green, P.; Shabon, U.; Bao, W.; Aiyar, N.;
Yue, T. -L.; Brown, A. J.; Morrison, A. D.; Douglas, S.
A. (2009). “The novel endocannabinoid receptor GPR55
is activated by atypical cannabinoids but does not medi-
ate their vasodilator effects”. British Journal of Pharma-
cology 152 (5): 825–831. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707419.
PMC 2190033. PMID 17704827.
ADB-FUBINACA
• ADBICA
• APINACA
• PF-03550096
• SDB-001
• STS-135
17.2 References
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Matsuda, S.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-
Hanajiri, R.; Goda, Y. (2013). “Two new-type
cannabimimetic quinolinyl carboxylates, QUPIC and
QUCHIC, two new cannabimimetic carboxamide deriva-
tives, ADB-FUBINACA and ADBICA, and five synthetic
cannabinoids detected with a thiophene derivative α-PVT
and an opioid receptor agonist AH-7921 identified in ille-
gal products”. Forensic Toxicology. doi:10.1007/s11419-
013-0182-9.
35
Chapter 18
ADB-PINACA
• ADB-FUBINACA
18.2 References
[1] “ADB-PINACA”. Forendex.
36
Chapter 19
ADBICA
• APINACA
• PF-03550096
• SDB-001
• STS-135
19.2 References
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Matsuda, S.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-
Hanajiri, R.; Goda, Y. (2013). “Two new-type
cannabimimetic quinolinyl carboxylates, QUPIC and
QUCHIC, two new cannabimimetic carboxamide deriva-
tives, ADB-FUBINACA and ADBICA, and five synthetic
cannabinoids detected with a thiophene derivative α-PVT
and an opioid receptor agonist AH-7921 identified in ille-
gal products”. Forensic Toxicology. doi:10.1007/s11419-
013-0182-9.
37
Chapter 20
Ajulemic acid
Ajulemic acid (AB-III-56, HU-239, IP-751, CPL 7075, nal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 320
CT-3, Resunab) is a synthetic cannabinoid derivative of (2): 678–686. doi:10.1124/jpet.106.111625. PMC
the non-psychoactive THC metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy- 2633725. PMID 17105826.
THC that shows useful analgesic and anti-inflammatory
[5] Sumariwalla, P.; Gallily, R.; Tchilibon, S.; Fride, E.;
effects without causing a subjective “high”.[1] It is be- Mechoulam, R.; Feldmann, M. (2004). “A novel syn-
ing developed for the treatment of neuropathic pain and thetic, nonpsychoactive cannabinoid acid (HU-320) with
inflammatory conditions such as arthritis.[2] It does not antiinflammatory properties in murine collagen-induced
however share the anti-emetic effects of other cannabi- arthritis”. Arthritis and rheumatism 50 (3): 985–998.
noids but may be useful for treating pain and chronic doi:10.1002/art.20050. PMID 15022343.
inflammatory conditions where nausea is not present.[3]
[6] Sumariwalla, P.F., et al. (2004). “Reply”. Arthritis &
Side effects include dry mouth, tiredness and dizziness.
Rheumatism 50 (12): 4079. doi:10.1002/art.20806.
The mechanism of action has not yet been fully estab-
lished, but ajulemic acid may activate the CB2 recep-
tor in the periphery leading to production of resolving
eicosanoids. Studies in animals at doses up to 40 mg/kg
show minimal psychoactivity of ajulemic acid, compa-
rable to that produced by tetrahydrocannabinol,.[4] Like-
wise, there was no difference between ajulemic acid and
placebo on the “cannabimimetic” assay when used in hu-
mans at therapeutic doses.[5][6] A new highly purified
composition of ajulemic acid named Resunab is being de-
veloped by Corbus Pharmaceuticals (formerly JB Ther-
apeutics)for the treatment of orphan life-threatening in-
flammatory diseases.
20.1 References
[1] Burstein, S.; Karst, M.; Schneider, U.; Zurier, R. (2004).
“Ajulemic acid: A novel cannabinoid produces analge-
sia without a “high"". Life Sciences 75 (12): 1513–1522.
doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2004.04.010. PMID 15240185.
38
Chapter 21
AM-087
21.2 References
[1] Charalambous A, et al. Pharmacological evaluation
of halogenated delta 8-THC analogs. Pharmacology,
Biochemistry and Behaviour. 1991 Nov;40(3):509-12.
PMID 1666915
39
Chapter 22
AM-1220
Related 1-(N-methylpyrrolidin-2-ylmethyl) and 1-(N- [7] Head Shop ‘Legal Highs’ Active Constituents Identifica-
methylmorpholin-3-ylmethyl) derivatives tion Chart (July - August 2010)
40
Chapter 23
AM-1221
• AM-1235
• AM-2233
• UR-144
• N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
23.2 References
[1] WO patent 200128557, Makriyannis A, Deng H,
“Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2001-06-
07
41
Chapter 24
AM-1235
24.1.2 Pharmacokinetics
• AM-2389
• O-1812
42
Chapter 25
AM-1241
43
44 CHAPTER 25. AM-1241
AM-1248
AM-1248 is a drug that acts as a moderately potent [4] Jankovics P, et al. (August 2011). “Detection and
agonist for both the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 , identification of the new potential synthetic cannabi-
but with some dispute between sources over its exact noids 1-pentyl-3-(2-iodobenzoyl)indole and 1-pentyl-3-
potency and selectivity. Replacing the 3-(1-naphthoyl) (1-adamantoyl)indole in seized bulk powders in Hun-
group found in many indole derived cannabinoid ligands, gary”. Forensic Science International 214 (1-3): 27–32.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.011. PMID 21813254.
with an adamantoyl group, generally confers significant
CB2 selectivity,[1] but reasonable CB1 affinity and selec-
tivity is retained when an N-methylpiperidin-2-ylmethyl
substitution is used at the indole 1-position.[2][3] The
related compound 1-pentyl-3-(1-adamantoyl)indole was
identified as having been sold as a cannabinoid designer
drug in Hungary in 2011, along with another synthetic
cannabinoid AM-679.[4]
• A-834,735
• AB-001
• AM-411
• AM-1220
• AM-2233
• Cannabipiperidiethanone
26.2 References
[1] Frost, J. M., et al. (2010). “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl Ketones:
Effects of N1 Substituted Indole Side Chain Variations on
CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor Activity”. Journal of Medic-
inal Chemistry 53 (1): 295. doi:10.1021/jm901214q.
PMID 19921781.
45
Chapter 27
AM-1714
27.2 References
[1] Khanolkar AD, Lu D, Ibrahim M, Duclos RI Jr, Thakur
GA, Malan TP Jr, Porreca F, Veerappan V, Tian X,
George C, Parrish DA, Papahatjis DP, Makriyannis A.
Cannabilactones: a novel class of CB2 selective agonists
with peripheral analgesic activity. Journal of Medici-
nal Chemistry. 2007 Dec 27;50(26):6493-500. PMID
18038967
46
Chapter 28
AM-2201
47
Chapter 29
AM-2232
AM-2232 (1-(4-cyanobutyl)−3-(naphthalen-1-
oyl)indole) is a drug that acts as a potent but unselective
agonist for the cannabinoid receptors, with a Kᵢ of
0.28nM at CB1 and 1.48nM at CB2 .[1]
• O-1812
29.2 References
[1] US patent 7241799, Makriyannis A, Deng H,
“Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2007-
07-10
48
Chapter 30
AM-2233
AM-2233 is a drug that acts as a highly potent full ago- [5] Dhawan, J.; Deng, H.; Gatley, S. J.; Makriyannis, A.;
nist for the cannabinoid receptors, with a Kᵢ of 1.8nM at Akinfeleye, T.; Bruneus, M.; Dimaio, A. A.; Gif-
CB1 and 2.2nM at CB2 as the active (R) enantiomer.[1] It ford, A. N. (2006). “Evaluation of the in vivo re-
was developed as a selective radioligand for the cannabi- ceptor occupancy for the behavioral effects of cannabi-
noid receptors and has been used as its 131 I derivative noids using a radiolabeled cannabinoid receptor ago-
nist, R-[125/131I]AM2233”. Synapse 60 (2): 93–101.
for mapping the distribution of the CB1 receptor in the
doi:10.1002/syn.20277. PMID 16715483.
brain.[2][3][4][5][6][7] AM-2233 was found to fully substi-
tute for THC in rats, with a potency lower than that of [6] Leung K (Dec 12, 2006). “R-2-[131I]Iodophenyl-
JWH-018 but higher than WIN 55,212-2.[8] (1-(1-methylpiperidin-2-ylmethyl)−1H-indol-3-
yl)methanone”. Molecular Imaging and Contrast
Agent Database (MICAD) [Internet]. PMID 20641836.
30.1 See also [7] Pei, Y., et al. (2008). “Ligand-Binding Architecture
of Human CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor: Evidence for
• AM-679 Receptor Subtype-Specific Binding Motif and Model-
ing GPCR Activation”. Chemistry & Biology 15: 1207.
• AM-694 doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.011.
• AM-1220 [8] Järbe TU, Deng H, Vadivel SK, Makriyannis A (Septem-
ber 2011). “Cannabinergic aminoalkylindoles, includ-
• AM-1221
ing AM678=JWH018 found in 'Spice', examined us-
• AM-1241 ing drug (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol) discrimination for
rats”. Behavioural Pharmacology 22 (5-6): 498–507.
• Cannabipiperidiethanone doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e328349fbd5. PMC 3212432.
PMID 21836461.
30.2 References
[1] Hongfeng Deng (2000). Design and synthesis of selec-
tive cannabinoid receptor ligands: Aminoalkylindole and
other heterocyclic analogs (PhD Dissertation). University
of Connecticut.
[2] Deng H, et al. (October 2005). “Potent cannabinergic in-
dole analogues as radioiodinatable brain imaging agents
for the CB1 cannabinoid receptor”. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry 48 (20): 6386–92. doi:10.1021/jm050135l.
PMID 16190764.
[3] Hanuš, L. R. O.; Mechoulam, R. (2005). “Cannabi-
noid chemistry: an overview”. “Cannabinoids as Ther-
apeutics”. Milestones in Drug Therapy MDT. p. 23.
doi:10.1007/3-7643-7358-X_2. ISBN 3-7643-7055-6.
[4] Shen CP, et al. (February 2006). “F200A substitution
in the third transmembrane helix of human cannabinoid
CB1 receptor converts AM2233 from receptor agonist to
inverse agonist”. European Journal of Pharmacology 531
(1–3): 41–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.026. PMID
16438957.
49
Chapter 31
AM-2389
• AMG-36
• AMG-41
31.2 References
[1] Nikas SP, et al. Novel 1',1'-chain substituted hexahy-
drocannabinols: 9β-hydroxy-3-(1-hexyl-cyclobut-1-yl)-
hexahydrocannabinol (AM2389) a highly potent cannabi-
noid receptor 1 (CB1) agonist. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 2010 Oct 14;53(19):6996-7010. PMID
20925434
50
Chapter 32
AM-4030
AM-4030 is an analgesic drug which is a cannabinoid re- novel chiral cannabinoid receptor ligand. Journal of Bio-
ceptor agonist. It is a derivative of HU-210 which has chemical and Biophysical Methods. 2002 Dec 31;54(1-
been substituted with a 6β-((E)−3-hydroxyprop-1-enyl) 3):415-22. PMID 12543516
group. This adds a “southern” aliphatic hydroxyl group
to the molecule as seen in the CP-series of nonclassical
cannabinoid drugs, and so AM-4030 represents a hybrid
structure between the classical and nonclassical cannabi-
noid families,[1] with the 6-hydroxyalkyl chain rigidified
with a double bond with defined stereochemistry. This
gives AM-4030 a greater degree of selectivity, so while
it is still a potent agonist at both CB1 and CB2 , it is rea-
sonably selective for CB1 , with a Kᵢ of 0.7nM at CB1 and
8.6nM at CB2 , a selectivity of around 12x.[2][3] Resolu-
tion of the enantiomers of AM-4030 yields an even more
potent compound, although with less selectivity, with the
(-) enantiomer AM-4030a having a Kᵢ of 0.6nM at CB1
and 1.1nM at CB2 .[4]
32.2 References
[1] Roger Pertwee. Cannabinoids. Handbook of Experimen-
tal Pharmacology Volume 168, p 269. Springer. ISBN
3-540-22565-X
51
Chapter 33
AM-411
• AM-1248
• KM-233
33.2 References
[1] Lu D, et al. Adamantyl cannabinoids: a novel class of
cannabinergic ligands. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
2005 Jul 14;48(14):4576-85. PMID 15999995
52
Chapter 34
AM-630
53
Chapter 35
AM-6545
AM-6545 is a drug which acts as a peripherally selec- Makriyannis A, Sharkey KA. A novel peripherally re-
tive silent antagonist for the CB1 receptor, and was de- stricted cannabinoid receptor antagonist, AM6545, re-
veloped for the treatment of obesity. Other cannabinoid duces food intake and body weight, but does not cause
antagonists such as rimonabant have been marketed for malaise, in rodents. British Journal of Pharmacology.
this application, but have subsequently been withdrawn 2010 Oct;161(3):629-42. PMID 20880401
from sale because of centrally mediated side effects such [4] Järbe TU, LeMay BJ, Vemuri VK, Vadivel SK, Zvonok
as depression and nausea. Because AM-6545 does not A, Makriyannis A. Central mediation and differential
cross the blood–brain barrier to any significant extent, it blockade by cannabinergics of the discriminative stimu-
does not produce these kinds of side effects, but has still lus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist
been shown to effectively reduce appetite and food con- rimonabant in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 2011
sumption in animal studies.[1][2][3][4] Aug;216(3):355-65. PMID 21369753
35.2 References
[1] Tam, J.; Vemuri, V. K.; Liu, J.; Bátkai, S. N.; Mukhopad-
hyay, B.; Godlewski, G.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Ohnuma, S.;
Ambudkar, S. V.; Pickel, J.; Makriyannis, A.; Kunos, G.
(2010). “Peripheral CB1 cannabinoid receptor blockade
improves cardiometabolic risk in mouse models of obe-
sity”. Journal of Clinical Investigation 120 (8): 2953–
2966. doi:10.1172/JCI42551. PMC 2912197. PMID
20664173. PMID 20664173
54
Chapter 36
AM-679 (cannabinoid)
• AM-694
• AM-2233
36.2 References
[1] WO patent 200128557, Makriyannis A, Deng H,
“Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2001-06-
07
55
Chapter 37
AM-694
37.1.1 Pharmacokinetics
• AM-679
• AM-2201
• AM-2233
56
Chapter 38
AM-855
38.1 References
[1] Khanolkara, Atmaram D.; Dai Lua, Pusheng Fana, Xi-
aoyu Tiana and Alexandros Makriyannis (August 1999).
“Novel conformationally restricted tetracyclic analogs
of Δ8 -tetrahydrocannabinol”. Bioorganic & Medicinal
Chemistry Letters 9 (15): 2119–24. doi:10.1016/S0960-
894X(99)00355-8. PMID 10465529.
57
Chapter 39
AM-905
39.1 References
[1] Papahatjis DP, Kourouli T, Abadji V, Goutopoulos
A, Makriyannis A. Pharmacophoric requirements for
cannabinoid side chains: multiple bond and C1'-
substituted delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinols. Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry. 1998 Mar 26;41(7):1195-200.
PMID 9544219
58
Chapter 40
AM-906
40.2 References
[1] Papahatjis DP, et al. Pharmacophoric requirements
for cannabinoid side chains: multiple bond and C1'-
substituted delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinols. Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry. 1998 Mar 26;41(7):1195-200.
PMID 9544219
59
Chapter 41
AM-919
41.2 References
[1] Roger Pertwee. Cannabinoids. Handbook of Experimen-
tal Pharmacology Volume 168, p 269. Springer. ISBN
3-540-22565-X
60
Chapter 42
AM-938
42.2 References
[1] Roger Pertwee. Cannabinoids. Handbook of Experimen-
tal Pharmacology Volume 168, p 269. Springer. ISBN
3-540-22565-X
61
Chapter 43
AM404
43.3 References
[1] Rogosch T, Sinning C, Podlewski A, Watzer B, Schlos-
burg J, Lichtman AH, Cascio MG, Bisogno T, Di Marzo
V, Nüsing R, Imming P (January 2012). “Novel bioac-
tive metabolites of dipyrone (metamizol)". Bioorg. Med.
62
Chapter 44
AMG-1
44.1 References
[1] Papahatjis DP, Nikas SP, Kourouli T, Chari R, Xu
W, Pertwee RG, Makriyannis A. Pharmacophoric re-
quirements for the cannabinoid side chain. Probing the
cannabinoid receptor subsite at C1'. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 2003 Jul 17;46(15):3221-9. PMID 12852753
63
Chapter 45
AMG-3
45.1 References
[1] Mavromoustakos T, Theodoropoulou E, Zervou M,
Kourouli T, Papahatjis D. Structure elucidation and
conformational properties of synthetic cannabinoids (-
)−2-(6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-6,6,9-trimethyl-1-hydroxy-
6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyranyl)−2-hexyl-1,3-dithiolane and
its methylated analog. Journal of Pharmaceutical and
Biomedical Analysis. 1999 Jan;18(6):947-56. PMID
9925329
[2] Papahatjis DP, Kourouli T, Abadji V, Goutopoulos
A, Makriyannis A. Pharmacophoric requirements for
cannabinoid side chains: multiple bond and C1'-
substituted delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinols. Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry. 1998 Mar 26;41(7):1195-200.
PMID 9544219
[3] Papahatjis DP, Nikas SP, Kourouli T, Chari R, Xu
W, Pertwee RG, Makriyannis A. Pharmacophoric re-
quirements for the cannabinoid side chain. Probing the
cannabinoid receptor subsite at C1'. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 2003 Jul 17;46(15):3221-9. PMID 12852753
[4] Durdagi S, Papadopoulos MG, Papahatjis DP, Mavro-
moustakos T. Combined 3D QSAR and molecular dock-
ing studies to reveal novel cannabinoid ligands with opti-
mum binding activity. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chem-
istry Letters. 2007 Dec 15;17(24):6754-63. PMID
17980589
[5] Antoniou K, Galanopoulos A, Vlachou S, Kourouli T,
Nahmias V, Thermos K, Panagis G, Daifoti Z, Marselos
M, Papahatjis D, Spyraki C. Behavioral pharmacological
properties of a novel cannabinoid 1',1'-dithiolane delta8-
THC analog, AMG-3. Behavioural Pharmacology. 2005
Sep;16(5-6):499-510. PMID 16148456
64
Chapter 46
AMG-36
46.1 References
[1] Papahatjis DP, et al. Pharmacophoric requirements for
the cannabinoid side chain. Probing the cannabinoid re-
ceptor subsite at C1'. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
2003 Jul 17;46(15):3221-9. PMID 12852753
65
Chapter 47
AMG-41
47.1 References
[1] Papahatjis DP, Nikas SP, Andreou T, Makriyan-
nis A. Novel 1',1'-chain substituted Delta(8)-
tetrahydrocannabinols. Bioorganic and Medicinal
Chemistry Letters. 2002 Dec 16;12(24):3583-6. PMID
12443781
66
Chapter 48
APINACA
This article is about the synthetic cannabinoid drug. For 48.3 References
the Japanese girl group, see AKB48.
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-Hanajiri, R.;
Goda, Y. (2012). “URB-754: A new class of de-
AKB48 (APINACA, N-(1-adamantyl)−1-pentyl-1H-
signer drug and 12 synthetic cannabinoids detected in il-
indazole-3-carboxamide) is a drug that acts as a rea-
legal products”. Forensic Science International 227 (1–
sonably potent agonist for the cannabinoid receptors,[1] 3): 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.047. PMID
with a Kᵢ of 304.5nM and a EC50 of 585nM at CB1 . 23063179.
It had never previously been reported in the scientific
or patent literature, and was first identified by labo- [2] Uchiyama, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-Hanajiri,
ratories in Japan in March 2012 as an ingredient in R.; Goda, Y. (2012). “Identification of two new-
synthetic cannabis smoking blends, along with a related type synthetic cannabinoids, N-(1-adamantyl)−1-
pentyl-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (APICA) and N-(1-
compound APICA.[2] Structurally it closely resembles
adamantyl)−1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AP-
cannabinoid compounds from patent WO 2003/035005
INACA), and detection of five synthetic cannabinoids,
but with a simple pentyl chain on the indazole 1-position, AM-1220, AM-2233, AM-1241, CB-13 (CRA-13), and
and AKB48 falls within the claims of this patent despite AM-1248, as designer drugs in illegal products”. Forensic
not being disclosed as an example. AKB48 was made il- Toxicology 30 (2): 114. doi:10.1007/s11419-012-0136-
legal in Japan in 2012,[3] and was banned as a temporary 7.
class drug in New Zealand from 13 July 2012.[4] It has
been banned in Latvia since 14 November 2013. The [3] “Designation of “Shitei Yakubutsu” (designated sub-
stances) based on the provision of the Pharmaceutical Af-
DEA announced its intent to schedule 16 May 2013. [5]
fairs Law (1960, Law No.145)" (PDF).
[5] url=http://www.justice.gov/dea/divisions/hq/2013/
A forensic standard of AKB48 is available, and the com- hq051613.shtml
pound has been posted on the Forendex website of poten-
tial drugs of abuse.[6] [6] http://forendex.southernforensic.org/index.php/detail/
index/1221
67
Chapter 49
AR-231,453
• PSN-632,408
49.2 References
[1] Semple G, Fioravanti B, Pereira G, Calderon I, Uy J, Choi
K, Xiong Y, Ren A, Morgan M, Dave V, Thomsen W, Un-
ett DJ, Xing C, Bossie S, Carroll C, Chu ZL, Grottick AJ,
Hauser EK, Leonard J, Jones RM. (2008). “Discovery of
the first potent and orally efficacious agonist of the orphan
G-protein coupled receptor 119.”. J Med Chem. 51 (17):
5172–5175. doi:10.1021/jm8006867. PMID 18698756.
68
Chapter 50
Arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide
50.1 References
[1] Hillard, CJ; Manna, S; Greenberg, MJ; Dicamelli, R;
Ross, RA; Stevenson, LA; Murphy, V; Pertwee, RG;
Campbell, WB (1999). “Synthesis and characterization
of potent and selective agonists of the neuronal cannabi-
noid receptor (CB1)". The Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics 289 (3): 1427–33. PMID
10336536.
69
Chapter 51
Arachidonylcyclopropylamide
51.1 References
[1] Hillard, CJ, et al. (1999). “Synthesis and characteri-
zation of potent and selective agonists of the neuronal
cannabinoid receptor (CB1)". The Journal of Pharma-
cology and Experimental Therapeutics 289 (3): 1427–33.
PMID 10336536.
70
Chapter 52
N-Arachidonylglycine
N-Arachidonylglycine (NAGly) is a carboxylic analog models, reducing mechanical allodynia and thermal hy-
of the endocannabinoid anandamide.[1] Since it was first peralgesia induced by intraplantar injection of Fruend’s
synthesized in 1996,[2] NAGly has been a primary fo- complete adjuvant.[11] Similar mechanical allydonia in-
cus of the relatively contemporary field of lipidomics duced by partial ligation of the sciatic nerve was also re-
due to its wide range of signaling targets in the brain, duced by NaGly.[12] Other arachidonic acid-amino acid
the immune system and throughout various other bod- conjugates did not have the same effects and the actions
ily systems. In combination with 2‐arachidonoyl glyc- of NaGly were not affected by cannabinoid receptor ago-
erol (2‐AG), NAGly has enabled the identification of a nists in either study, suggesting a novel non-cannabinoid
family of lipids often referred to as endocannabinoids.[3] receptor mediated approach to alleviate inflammatory
Recently, NAGly has been found to bind to G-protein pain.[11][12]
coupled receptor 18 (GPR18), the putative abnormal NaGly was shown to be endogenous ligand for the G-
cannabidiol receptor.[4][5] NaGly is found throughout the protein couple receptor GPR92 along with farnesyl py-
body and research on its explicit functions is on going. rophosphate.[13] In the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), where
GPR92 was found to be localized NaGly increased intra-
cellular calcium levels in DRG neurons, indicating a role
52.1 Synthesis of NaGly in the sensory nervous system through the acti-
vation of GPR92.[13]
The exact biosynthesis of NaGly is not completely un-
derstood, but there are two proposed pathways found
in vitro for its biosynthesis: 1) enzymatically regulated 52.2.2 Effects on the immune system
conjugation of arachidonic acid and glycine and 2) the
oxidative metabolism of the endogenous cannabinoid NAGly has been the focus of research on the immune sys-
anandamide.[6][7] In the first pathway, Cytochrome c cat- tem because of its antinociceptive effects and inhibitory
alyzes the in vitro synthesis of NaGly from arachidonoyl action on components of the immune system. Specif-
coenzyme A and glycine in the presence of hydrogen ically, it significantly inhibited TNFα and IFNγ pro-
peroxide.[8] In the second pathway, alcohol dehydro- duction, and it shows potential as a therapeutic treat-
genase catalyzes the oxidation of anandamide into N- ment for chronic inflammation.[14] Moreover, NAGly has
arachidonoyl glycine.[9] been shown to act as a substrate for cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2), the enzyme primarily known for producing
prostaglandins associated with increases in inflammation
and hyperalgesia. In many mammalian tissues that ex-
52.2 Research press COX-2, significant levels of NAGly are naturally
present, and in these tissues COX-2 selectively metabo-
52.2.1 Effects on the nervous system lizes NAGly prostaglandin (PG) H2 glycine and HETE-
Gly.[15]
NAGly has been hypothesized to have a neurophysio-
logical function of pain suppression, supported by ev-
idence that it suppresses formalin-induced pain behav- 52.2.3 Cell migration
ior in rats.[10] In particular, peripherally administered
NAGly inhibited phase 2 pain behavior, suggesting ei- NAGly has been hypothesized to induce cell migra-
ther a direct suppresion of nociceptive afferents on the tion in BV-2 microglia cells.[4] The same research
nerve or an indirect modulation of the afferents’ inter- suggests that this migration occurs through GPR18.
stitial environment.[10] In either case, these findings hold This was verified using GPR18 transfected HEK-293
promise for NAGly as a means of mitigating postopera- cells. The same migration wasn't witnessed using non-
tive or chronic pain. NAGly is also effective in acute pain transfected and GPR55 transfected HEK-293.[4] Addi-
71
72 CHAPTER 52. N-ARACHIDONYLGLYCINE
tionally, tetrahydrocannabinol and NaGly are full agonists ligand for orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR18.”.
at the GPR18 receptors and induce migration in human Biochemical and biophysical research communications 347
endometrial HEC-1B cells.[16] Understanding functions (3): 827–32. PMID 16844083.
of NaGly in such structures provides a promising future
[6] Bradshaw, Heather B; Rimmerman, Neta; Hu, Sherry;
in helping treat diseases such as endometriosis. Benton, Valery M; Stuart, Jordyn M; Masuda, Kim; Cra-
vatt, Benjamin F; O'Dell, David K; Walker, J Michael (1
January 2009). “The endocannabinoid anandamide is a
52.2.4 Other targets precursor for the signaling lipid N-arachidonoyl glycine
by two distinct pathways”. BMC Biochemistry 10 (1): 14.
Insulin secretion doi:10.1186/1471-2091-10-14.
NaGly was identified as a novel insulin secretagogue and [7] Aneetha, Halikhedkar; O’Dell, David K.; Tan, Bo;
was shown to increase intracellular calcium concentra- Walker, J. Michael; Hurley, Thomas D. (1 January
2009). “Alcohol dehydrogenase-catalyzed in vitro ox-
tion through stimulation of voltage dependent calcium
idation of anandamide to N-arachidonoyl glycine, a
channels.[17] Additionally, this action was dependent on lipid mediator: Synthesis of N-acyl glycinals”. Bioor-
extracellular glucose level.[17] ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 19 (1): 237–241.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.10.087.
Additional biochemical interactions [8] McCue, JM; Driscoll, WJ; Mueller, GP (Jan 11, 2008).
“Cytochrome c catalyzes the in vitro synthesis of arachi-
NaGly has been shown to inhibit the glycine transporter donoyl glycine.”. Biochemical and biophysical research
GLYT2a in a non-competitive fashion with arachidonic communications 365 (2): 322–7. PMID 17986381.
acids and secondary messenger systems of GLYT2a, sug-
[9] Aneetha, H; O'Dell, DK; Tan, B; Walker, JM; Hurley,
gesting a novel recognition site for the N-arachodnoyl TD (Jan 1, 2009). “Alcohol dehydrogenase-catalyzed in
amino acids, especially because other conjugated amino vitro oxidation of anandamide to N-arachidonoyl glycine,
acids had similar effects.[18] a lipid mediator: synthesis of N-acyl glycinals.”. Bioor-
ganic & medicinal chemistry letters 19 (1): 237–41. PMID
19013794.
52.3 References [10] Huang, Susan M.; Bisogno, T., Petros, T.J., Chang, S.Y.,
Zavitsanos, P.A., Zipkin, R.E., Sivakumar, R., Coop, A.,
[1] Burstein, Sumner; Huang, S.M.; Petros, T.J.; Ros- Maeda, D.Y., De Petrocellis, L., Burstein, S., Di Marzo,
setti, R.G.; Walker, J.M.; Zurier, R.B. (30 April V., Walker, J.M. (November 16, 2001). “Identification
2002). “Regulation of anandamide tissue levels by of a New Class of Molecules, the Arachidonyl Amino
N-arachidonylglycine”. Biochemical Pharmacology 64 Acids, and Characterization of One Member That Inhibits
(7): 1147–1150. doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(02)01301-1. Pain”. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276 (46):
PMID 12234618. 42639–42644. doi:10.1074/jbc.M107351200. PMID
11518719.
[2] Sheskin, Tzviel; Hanus, L.; Slager, J.; Vogel, Z.;
Mechoulam, R. (1997). “Structural Requirements for [11] Succar, Rebecca; Mitchell, Vanessa A; Vaughan, Christo-
Binding of Anandamide-Type Compounds to the Brain pher W (August 2007). “Actions of N-arachidonyl-
Cannabinoid Receptor”. Journal of Medicinal Chem- glycine in a rat inflammatory pain model”. Molecular Pain
istry 40 (5): 659–667. doi:10.1021/jm960752x. PMID 3 (1): 24. doi:10.1186/1744-8069-3-24.
9057852.
[12] Vuong, Leeza A.Q.; Mitchell, Vanessa A.; Vaughan,
[3] Bradshaw, Heather; Rimmerman, N.; Hu, S.J.; Burstein, Christopher W. (1 January 2008). “Actions of
S.; Walker, J.M. (2009). “Novel Endogenous N-Acyl N-arachidonyl-glycine in a rat neuropathic pain
Glycines: Identification and Characterization”. Vi- model”. Neuropharmacology 54 (1): 189–193.
tamins and Hormones. Vitamins & Hormones 81: doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.05.004.
191–205. doi:10.1016/S0083-6729(09)81008-X. ISBN
9780123747822. PMID 19647113. [13] Oh, D. Y.; Yoon, J. M.; Moon, M. J.; Hwang, J.-
I.; Choe, H.; Lee, J. Y.; Kim, J. I.; Kim, S.; Rhim,
[4] McHugh, Douglas; Hu, Sherry SJ; Rimmerman, Neta; H.; O'Dell, D. K.; Walker, J. M.; Na, H. S.; Lee,
Juknat, Ana; Vogel, Zvi; Walker, J Michael; Bradshaw, M. G.; Kwon, H. B.; Kim, K.; Seong, J. Y. (22 May
Heather B (1 January 2010). “N-arachidonoyl glycine, 2008). “Identification of Farnesyl Pyrophosphate and N-
an abundant endogenous lipid, potently drives directed Arachidonylglycine as Endogenous Ligands for GPR92”.
cellular migration through GPR18, the putative abnor- Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 (30): 21054–21064.
mal cannabidiol receptor”. BMC Neuroscience 11 (1): 44. doi:10.1074/jbc.M708908200.
doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-44.
[14] Ferrante, A; Poulos A; Pitt M; Easton C; Sleigh M; Rath-
[5] Kohno, M; Hasegawa, H; Inoue, A; Muraoka, M; jen D; Widmer F. “Methods of Treating Immunopatholo-
Miyazaki, T; Oka, K; Yasukawa, M (Sep 1, 2006). gies Using Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids”. United States
“Identification of N-arachidonylglycine as the endogenous patent publication WO 97/38688.
52.3. REFERENCES 73
AZ-11713908
AZ-11713908 is a drug developed by AstraZeneca which [5] WO patent 2004/108712, LIU Z, PAGÈ D, WALPOLE
is a peripherally selective cannabinoid agonist, acting as C, YANG H, “BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES,
a potent agonist at the CB1 receptor and a partial ag- COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THEM, PREPARA-
onist at CB2 . It has poor blood–brain barrier penetra- TION THEREOF AND USES THEREOF”, granted
tion, and so while it is an effective analgesic in animal 16.12.2004
tests, it produces only peripheral effects at low doses,
with much weaker symptoms of central effects compared
to other cannabinoid drugs such as WIN 55,212-2.[1] A
large number of related benzimidazole derived cannabi-
noid ligands are known.[2][3][4][5]
53.2 References
[1] Yu XH, Cao CQ, Martino G, Puma C, Morinville A, St-
Onge S, Lessard E, Perkins MN, Laird JM (November
2010). “A peripherally restricted cannabinoid receptor
agonist produces robust anti-nociceptive effects in rodent
models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain”. Pain 151
(2): 337–44. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.019. PMID
20696525.
[2] Verbist BM, De Cleyn MA, Surkyn M, Fraiponts
E, Aerssens J, Nijsen MJ, Gijsen HJ (April 2008).
“5-Sulfonyl-benzimidazoles as selective CB2 agonists”.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 18 (8): 2574–9.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.03.048. PMID 18394887.
[3] Pagé D, Balaux E, Boisvert L, Liu Z, Milburn C, Tremblay
M, Wei Z, Woo S, Luo X, Cheng YX, Yang H, Srivastava
S, Zhou F, Brown W, Tomaszewski M, Walpole C, Hodzic
L, St-Onge S, Godbout C, Salois D, Payza K, Payza K
(July 2008). “Novel benzimidazole derivatives as selective
CB2 agonists”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
18 (13): 3695–700. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.073.
PMID 18522867.
[4] WO patent 2004/108688, LIU Z, PAGÈ D, WALPOLE
C, YANG H, “BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES,
COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THEM, PREPARA-
TION THEREOF AND USES THEREOF”, granted
16.12.2004
74
Chapter 54
BAY 38-7271
54.1 References
[1] Mauler F, Horváth E, De Vry J, Jäger R, Schwarz T, Sand-
mann S, Weinz C, Heinig R, Böttcher M. BAY 38-7271:
a novel highly selective and highly potent cannabinoid re-
ceptor agonist for the treatment of traumatic brain injury.
CNS Drug Reviews. 2003 Winter;9(4):343-58. PMID
14647528
[5] Pipeline
75
Chapter 55
BAY 59-3074
55.1 References
[1] De Vry J, Denzer D, Reissmueller E, Eijckenboom
M, Heil M, Meier H, Mauler F. 3-[2-cyano-3-
(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]phenyl-4,4,4-trifluoro-1-
butanesulfonate (BAY 59-3074): a novel cannabinoid
Cb1/Cb2 receptor partial agonist with antihyperalgesic
and antiallodynic effects. Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics. 2004 Aug;310(2):620-32.
PMID 15140913
76
Chapter 56
BML-190
56.1 References
[1] New, DC; Wong, YH (2003). “BML-190 and AM251
act as inverse agonists at the human cannabinoid CB2
receptor: signalling via cAMP and inositol phosphates”.
FEBS Letters 536 (1–3): 157–60. doi:10.1016/S0014-
5793(03)00048-6. PMID 12586356.
77
Chapter 57
(C6)-CP 47,497
• (C9)-CP 47,497
78
Chapter 58
(C9)-CP 47,497
• (C6)-CP 47,497
• (C7)-CP 47,497 (CP 47,497 itself)
• (C8)-CP 47,497
79
Chapter 59
Canbisol
• HU-243
• Nabilone
59.2 References
[1] Rhee MH, et al. (September 1997). “Cannabinol deriva-
tives: binding to cannabinoid receptors and inhibition of
adenylylcyclase”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 40 (20):
3228–33. doi:10.1021/jm970126f. PMID 9379442.
80
Chapter 60
Cannabichromene
Cannabichromene (abbreviated as CBC) is a cannabi- [3] Shinjyo, Noriko; Di Marzo, Vincenzo (2013). “The ef-
noid found in the cannabis plant. It bears struc- fect of cannabichromene on adult neural stem/progenitor
tural similarity to the other natural cannabinoids, in- cells”. Neurochemistry International 63 (5): 432–7.
cluding tetrahydrocannabinol, tetrahydrocannabivarin, doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2013.08.002. PMID 23941747.
cannabidiol, and cannabinol, among others. Evidence has
suggested that it may play a role in the anti-inflammatory
and anti-viral effects of cannabis, and may contribute to
the overall analgesic effects of medical cannabis. How-
ever, more research into the compound may be needed
before any definite medical effects can be verified.[1]
CBC has two stereoisomers. It is not scheduled by the
Convention on Psychotropic Substances. CBC is non-
psychotropic.[2]
60.2 References
[1] Gaoni, Y.; Mechoulam, R. (1966). “Cannabichromene, a
new active principle in hashish”. Chemical Communica-
tions 1: 20–1. doi:10.1039/C19660000020.
81
Chapter 61
Cannabicyclohexanol
• (C6)-CP 47,497
• (C9)-CP 47,497
• O-1871
61.2 References
[1] Cook, Morgan (2011-02-28). “Synthetic marijuana ille-
gal as of Tuesday”. North County Times (San Diego). Re-
trieved 2011-02-28.
82
Chapter 62
Cannabicyclol
• Cannabis
• Medical marijuana
• http://www.wiley-vch.de/stmdata/pdf/
CompoundList.pdf
• http://www.a1b2c3.com/drugs/mj028.htm
83
Chapter 63
Cannabidiol
Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of at least 85 active A 2010 study found that strains of cannabis contain-
cannabinoids identified in cannabis.[4] It is a major ing higher concentrations of cannabidiol did not produce
phytocannabinoid, accounting for up to 40% of the short-term memory impairment vs. strains with simi-
plant’s extract.[5] CBD is considered to have a wider lar concentrations of THC, but lower concentrations of
scope of medical applications than tetrahydrocannabinol CBD. The researchers attributed this attenuation of mem-
(THC).[5] An orally-administered liquid containing CBD ory effects to CBD’s role as a CB1 antagonist. Transder-
has received orphan drug status in the US, for use as a mal CBD is neuroprotective in animals.[8]
treatment for dravet syndrome, under the brand name Cannabidiol’s strong antioxidant properties have been
Epidiolex.[6] shown to play a role in the compound’s neuroprotective
and anti-ischemic effects.[9]
84
63.4. PHARMACOLOGY 85
anxiogenic effects.[17] Those results have been contested cannabionoid profile consistently around 1% cannabidiol
by,[18] and contradict [19] whose experimentation cover (CBD) with THC less than 0.1%.[32]
the same duration. Extraction can be done with olive oil, ethanol, or CO2,
Cannabidiol has demonstrated antidepressant-like effects and other nonpolar to semipolar solvents.
in animal models of depression.[20][21][22]
Hemp world production is around 30000 tonnes per year.
Cannabidiol numbering
63.8 US patent
See also: Tetrahydrocannabinol#Isomerism, Abnormal
cannabidiol. In October 2003, U.S. patent #6630507 entitled
“Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants” was
assigned to “The United States Of America As Repre-
sented By The Department Of Health And Human Ser-
63.6 Chemistry vices.” The patent was filed in April 1999 and listed as the
inventors: Aidan J. Hampson, Julius Axelrod, and Maur-
Cannabidiol is insoluble in water but soluble in organic izio Grimaldi, who all held positions at the National Insti-
solvents, such as pentane. At room temperature it is a tute of Mental Health (NIMH) in Bethesda, MD, which is
colorless crystalline solid.[48] In strongly basic medium part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an agency
and the presence of air it is oxidized to a quinone.[49] Un- of the United States Department of Health and Human
der acidic conditions it cyclizes to THC.[50] The synthesis Services (HHS). The patent mentions cannabidiol’s abil-
of cannabidiol has been accomplished by several research ity as an antiepileptic, to lower intraocular pressure in the
groups.[51][52][53] treatment of glaucoma, lack of toxicity or serious side ef-
fects in large acute doses, its neuroprotectant properties,
its ability to prevent neurotoxicity mediated by NMDA,
63.6.1 Biosynthesis AMPA, or kainate receptors; its ability to attenuate glu-
tamate toxicity, its ability to protect against cellular dam-
Cannabis produces CBD-carboxylic acid through the age, its ability to protect brains from ischemic damage,
same metabolic pathway as THC, until the last step, its anxiolytic effect, and its superior antioxidant activity
where CBDA synthase performs catalysis instead of which can be used in the prophylaxis and treatment of
THCA synthase.[54] oxidation associated diseases.[62]
On November 17, 2011, the Federal Register published
that the National Institutes of Health of the United States
63.7 Legal status Department of Health and Human Services was “contem-
plating the grant of an exclusive patent license to practice
the invention embodied in U.S. Patent 6,630,507” to the
Cannabidiol is not scheduled by the Convention on Psy- company KannaLife based in New York, for the devel-
chotropic Substances. opment and sale of cannabinoid and cannabidiol based
Cannabidiol is a Schedule II drug in Canada.[55] therapeutics for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
Cannabidiol’s legal status in the United States: in humans.[63][64][65]
While the DEA Drug Schedule classifies THC (Tetrahy- On July 9, 2012 — KannaLife Sciences, Inc. (“Kan-
drocannabinols) and marijuana as Schedule I, cannabidiol naLife”) Signed an Exclusive License Agreement With
is not found on the list.[56] Other synthetic cannabinoids National Institutes of Health – Office of Technology
such as JWH-019,073,081,122,200,203,250,398 are also Transfer (“NIH-OTT”) aka the United States Federal
listed in Schedule I, but cannabidiol is absent.[56] Government for the Commercialization of U.S. Patent
6,630,507, “Cannabinoids as Antioxidants and Neuro-
Marijuana is defined by 21 U.S.C. §802(16), which is part protectants” (the “’507 Patent”).
of the Controlled Substances Act. The mature stalks and
seeds of the Cannabis sativa L. plant, as well as prod- http://www.kannalife.com/
ucts derived from the mature stalks and seeds are ex- kannalife-sciences-inc-signs-exclusive-license-agreement-with-national-in
plicitly exempt from classification as marijuana.[57][58][59] On March 31, 2014 KannaLife Sciences, Inc.
Under this exception, what are known as industrial hemp- (“KannaLife”) and Kannaway LLC (“Kannaway”, a
finished products are legally imported into the United multi-level marketing program similar to Amway),
States each year.[60] Hemp finished products, including have entered into a five year sales, marketing
63.9. REFERENCES 87
and product development agreement (the “Agree- [10] Zuardi AW, Crippa JA, Hallak JE, Moreira FA,
ment”). - See more at: http://globenewswire.com/ Guimarães FS (April 2006). “Cannabidiol, a Cannabis
news-release/2014/03/31/622898/10074649/en/ sativa constituent, as an antipsychotic drug”. Braz. J. Med.
Biol. Res. (Review) 39 (4): 421–9. doi:10.1590/S0100-
KannaLife-Sciences-Inc-and-Kannaway-LLC-Sign-Long-Term-Sales-Marketing-and-Product-Development-Agreement.
html#sthash.pnvD6OXs.dpuf 879X2006000400001. PMID 16612464.
63.9 References [12] Leweke, FM; Piomelli D, Pahlisch F, Muhl D, Gerth CW,
Hoyer C, Klosterkötter J, Hellmich M and Koethe D.
(2012). “Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and
[1] Mechoulam R, Parker LA, Gallily R (November 2002). alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia”. Trans-
“Cannabidiol: an overview of some pharmacological lational Psychiatry 2 (3): e94–. doi:10.1038/tp.2012.15.
aspects”. J Clin Pharmacol (Review) 42 (11 Suppl): PMC 3316151. PMID 22832859.
11S–19S. doi:10.1177/0091270002238789. PMID
12412831. [13] José Alexandre de Souza Crippa, Antonio Waldo Zuardi,
Griselda E J Garrido, Lauro Wichert-Ana, Ricardo
[2] Scuderi C, Filippis DD, Iuvone T, Blasio A, Steardo Guarnieri, Lucas Ferrari, Paulo M Azevedo-Marques,
A, Esposito G (May 2009). “Cannabidiol in medicine: Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak, Philip K McGuire
a review of its therapeutic potential in CNS disor- and Geraldo Filho Busatto (October 2003). “Effects
ders”. Phytother Res (Review) 23 (5): 597–602. of Cannabidiol (CBD) on Regional Cerebral Blood
doi:10.1002/ptr.2625. PMID 18844286. Flow”. Neuropsychopharmacology 29 (2): 417–426.
doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300340. PMID 14583744.
[3] McPartland JM, Russo EB (2001). “Cannabis and
cannabis extracts: greater than the sum of their parts?". [14] Daniel Thomas Malone, Dennis Jongejana and David
Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics 1 (3/4): 103–132. Alan Taylora (August 2009). “Cannabidiol reverses
doi:10.1300/J175v01n03_08. the reduction in social interaction produced by low
dose Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in rats”. Pharma-
[4] Borgelt LM, Franson KL, Nussbaum AM, Wang GS cology Biochemistry and Behavior 93 (2): 91–96.
(February 2013). “The pharmacologic and clinical effects doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.010. PMID 19393686.
of medical cannabis”. Pharmacotherapy (Review) 33 (2):
195–209. doi:10.1002/phar.1187. PMID 23386598. [15] Mateus M Bergamaschi, Regina Helena Costa Queiroz,
Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas, Danielle Chaves Gomes
[5] Campos AC, Moreira FA, Gomes FV, Del Bel EA, de Oliveira, Bruno Spinosa De Martinis, Flávio Kapczin-
Guimarães FS (December 2012). “Multiple mechanisms ski, João Quevedo, Rafael Roesler, Nadja Schröder, Anto-
involved in the large-spectrum therapeutic potential of nio E Nardi, Rocio Martín-Santos, Jaime Eduardo Cecílio
cannabidiol in psychiatric disorders”. Philos. Trans. R. (May 2011). “Cannabidiol Reduces the Anxiety Induced
Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. (Review) 367 (1607): 3364– by Simulated Public Speaking in Treatment-Naïve So-
78. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0389. PMC 3481531. PMID cial Phobia Patients”. Neuropsychopharmacology 36 (6):
23108553. 1219–1226. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.6. PMC 3079847.
PMID 21307846.
[6] Wilner, AN (25 March 2014). “Marijuana for Epilepsy:
Weighing the Evidence”. Medscape Neurology. WebMD. [16] Crippa JA, Derenusson GN, Ferrari TB, Wichert-Ana L,
Retrieved 2 April 2014. Duran FL, Martin-Santos R, Simões MV, Bhattacharyya
S, Fusar-Poli P, Atakan Z, Santos Filho A, Freitas-Ferrari
[7] Russo EB (August 2011). “Taming THC: potential MC, McGuire PK, Zuardi AW, Busatto GF, Hallak JE.
cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid en- (January 2011). “Neural basis of anxiolytic effects of
tourage effects”. Br. J. Pharmacol. (Review) 163 cannabidiol (CBD) in generalized social anxiety disor-
(7): 1344–64. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x. der: a preliminary report”. J Psychopharmacol. 25
PMC 3165946. PMID 21749363. (1): 121–130. doi:10.1177/0269881110379283. PMID
20829306.
[8] Liput, D. J.; Hammell, D. C.; Stinchcomb, A. L.;
Nixon, K (2013). “Transdermal delivery of cannabid- [17] ElBatsh, MM; Assareh, N; Marsden, CA; Kendall,
iol attenuates binge alcohol-induced neurodegeneration DA (May 2012). “Anxiogenic-like effects of chronic
in a rodent model of an alcohol use disorder”. Phar- cannabidiol administration in rats”. Psychopharmacol-
macology Biochemistry and Behavior 111: 120–7. ogy 221 (2): 239–247. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2566-z.
doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2013.08.013. PMID 24012796. PMID 22083592.
[9] Mechoulam R, Peters M, Murillo-Rodriguez E, Hanus [18] Gururajan, A (2012). “Comment on: “Anxiogenic-like
LO (August 2007). “Cannabidiol--recent advances”. effects of chronic cannabidiol administration in rats” (El-
Chem. Biodivers. (Review) 4 (8): 1678–92. batsh MM, Assareh N, Marsden CA, Kendall DA, Psy-
doi:10.1002/cbdv.200790147. PMID 17712814. chopharmacology 2012)". Psychopharmacology 222 (4):
88 CHAPTER 63. CANNABIDIOL
725–6; author reply 727. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2780- [32] Fournier, G.; Beherec, O.; Bertucelli, S. (2003). “Intérêt
3. PMID 22760485. du rapport Δ−9-THC / CBD dans le contrôle des cultures
de chanvre industriel”. Annales de Toxicologie Analytique
[19] Réus, Gislaine Z. (2011). “Administration of cannabid- 15 (4): 250. doi:10.1051/ata/2003003.
iol and imipramine induces antidepressant-like effects in
the forced swimming test and increases brain-derived neu- [33] Hayakawa, K.; Mishima, K.; Hazekawa, M.; Sano, K.;
rotrophic factor levels in the rat amygdala”. Acta Neu- Irie, K.; Orito, K.; Egawa, T.; Kitamura, Y.; Uchida,
ropsychiatrica 23 (5): 241–248. doi:10.1111/j.1601- N.; Nishimura, R.; Egashira, N.; Iwasaki, K.; Fuji-
5215.2011.00579.x. wara, M. (2008). “Cannabidiol potentiates pharmacolog-
ical effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol via CB1 receptor-
[20] Zanelati, T; Biojone, C; Moreira, F; Guimarães, F; Joca, S dependent mechanism”. Brain Research 1188: 157–164.
(January 2010). “Antidepressant-like effects of cannabid- doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.090. PMID 18021759.
iol in mice: possible involvement of 5-HT1A recep-
tors”. British Journal of Pharmacology 159 (1): 122–8. [34] Pertwee, R. G. (2008). “The diverse CB1 and
doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00521.x. PMC 2823358. CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabi-
PMID 20002102. noids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and Δ9-
tetrahydrocannabivarin”. British Journal of Pharmacol-
[21] Réus, GZ; Stringari, RB; Ribeiro, KF; Luft, T; Abelaira, ogy 153 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707442.
HM; Fries, GR; Aguiar, BW; Kapczinski, F; Hallak, JE; PMC 2219532. PMID 17828291.
Zuardi, AW; Crippa JA; Quevedo, J (October 2011).
“Administration of cannabidiol and imipramine induces [35] Ryberg E, Larsson N, Sjögren S, et al. (2007). “The
antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming test orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid recep-
and increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in tor”. British Journal of Pharmacology 152 (7): 1092–
the rat amygdala”. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 23 (5): 241– 101. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707460. PMC 2095107. PMID
248. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5215.2011.00579.x. 17876302.
[22] El-Alfy, AT; Ivey, K; Robinson, K; Ahmed, S; Radwan, [36] Russo EB, Burnett A, Hall B, Parker KK (August
M; Slade, D; Khan, I; ElSohly, M; Ross, S (June 2010). 2005). “Agonistic properties of cannabidiol at 5-HT1a
“Antidepressant-like effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol receptors”. Neurochemical Research 30 (8): 1037–43.
and other cannabinoids isolated from Cannabis sativa L”. doi:10.1007/s11064-005-6978-1. PMID 16258853.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 95 (4): 434–
442. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2010.03.004. PMC 2866040. [37] Resstel LB, Tavares RF, Lisboa SF, Joca SR, Corrêa FM,
PMID 20332000. Guimarães FS (January 2009). “5-HT1A receptors are
involved in the cannabidiol-induced attenuation of be-
[23] http://www.dravetfoundation.org/dravet-syndrome/ havioural and cardiovascular responses to acute restraint
what-is-dravet-syndrome#sthash.jAC0bZ89.dpuf What stress in rats”. British Journal of Pharmacology 156 (1):
is Dravet Syndrome? 181–8. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00046.x. PMC
2697769. PMID 19133999.
[24] Melville, Nancy A. (14 Aug 2013), Seizure Disorders En-
ter Medical Marijuana Debate, Medscape Medical News., [38] Campos AC, Guimarães FS (August 2008). “Involve-
retrieved 2014-01-14 ment of 5HT1A receptors in the anxiolytic-like effects
of cannabidiol injected into the dorsolateral periaqueduc-
[25] Gloss D, Vickrey B (13 June 2012). “Cannabinoids tal gray of rats”. Psychopharmacology 199 (2): 223–30.
for epilepsy”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Review) doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1168-x. PMID 18446323.
6: CD009270. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009270.pub2.
PMID 22696383. [39] Mishima K, Hayakawa K, Abe K, et al. (May 2005).
“Cannabidiol prevents cerebral infarction via a seroton-
[26] Romney, Lee (13 September 2012). “On the frontier of
ergic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor-dependent mech-
medical pot to treat boy’s epilepsy”. Los Angeles Times.
anism”. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 36 (5):
1077–82. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000163083.59201.34.
[27] Good, Alastair (26 October 2010). “Growing marijuana
PMID 15845890.
that won't get you high”. The Daily Telegraph (London).
[28] Sidner, Sara (8 November 2012). “Medical marijuana [40] Hayakawa K, Mishima K, Nozako M, et al. (March 2007).
without the high” (video). CNN. “An Israeli company has “Repeated treatment with cannabidiol but not Delta9-
cultivated a new type of medical marijuana.” tetrahydrocannabinol has a neuroprotective effect without
the development of tolerance”. Neuropharmacology 52
[29] Solon, Olivia (5 July 2012). “Medical Marijuana Without (4): 1079–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.11.005.
the High”. Wired.com PMID 17320118.
[30] Lubell, Maayan (3 July 2012). “What a drag, Israeli firm [41] Kathmann, Markus; Flau, Karsten; Redmer, Agnes; Trän-
grows 'highless’ marijuana”. Reuters. Retrieved 31 Jan kle, Christian; Schlicker, Eberhard (2006). “Cannabid-
2014. iol is an allosteric modulator at mu- and delta-opioid re-
ceptors”. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacol-
[31] Cohen, Ytzchak (11 September 2014). “Cannabis plant ogy 372 (5): 354–361. doi:10.1007/s00210-006-0033-x.
named 'avidekel'". USPTO. Retrieved 7 October 2014. PMID 16489449.
63.10. EXTERNAL LINKS 89
[42] Bornheim, LM; Kim, KY; Li, J; Perotti, BY; Benet, LZ [55] Controlled Drugs and Substances Act - Schedule II
(August 1995). “Effect of cannabidiol pretreatment on
the kinetics of tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites in mouse [56] CSA Schedule, List of drugs by schedule.
brain”. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 23 (8): 825–
[57] Definition of marijuana under the Controlled Substances
831. PMID 7493549.
Act.
[43] Klein, C; Karanges, E; Spiro, A; Wong, A; Spencer, J; [58] Title 21 US Code Controlled Substances Act, text of the
Huynh, T; Gunasekaran, N; Karl, T; Long, LE; Huang, CSA.
XF; Liu, K; Arnold, JC; McGregor, IS (November
2011). “Cannabidiol potentiates Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol [59] Hemp Industries Assn., v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 9th
(THC) behavioural effects and alters THC pharmacoki- Circuit Court of Appeals case involving industrial hemp.
netics during acute and chronic treatment in adoles-
cent rats”. Psychopharmacology 218 (2): 443–457. [60] Hemp, Many definitions of common terms associated with
doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2342-0. PMID 21667074. hemp, including the history of hemp use.
[44] Hunt, CA; Jones, RT; Herning, RI; Bachman, J (June [61] Cannabidiol: The side of marijuana you don't know
1981). “Evidence that Cannabidiol Does Not Signifi-
[62] US patent 6630507, Hampson, Aidan J.; Axelrod, Julius;
cantly Alter the Pharmacokinetics of Tetrahydrocannabi-
Grimaldi, Maurizio, “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and
nol in Man”. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biophar-
neuroprotectants”, issued 2003-10-07
maceutics 9 (3): 245–260. doi:10.1007/BF01059266.
PMID 6270295. [63] “Federal Register | Prospective Grant of Exclusive Li-
cense: Development of Cannabinoid(s) and Cannabid-
[45] United States Adopted Names Council: Statement on a iol(s) Based Therapeutics To Treat Hepatic Encephalopa-
nonproprietary name thy in Humans”. Federalregister.gov. November 17,
2011. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
[46] “Fact Sheet — Sativex”. Health Canada. Retrieved 16
May 2013. [64] “KannaLife Sciences, Inc. Signs Exclusive License
Agreement With National Institutes Of Health Office Of
[47] GWPharma- Welcome
Technology Transfer (NIH-OTT)". thestreet.com. Re-
[48] Jones PG, Falvello L, Kennard O, Sheldrick GM Me- trieved 2012-07-09.
choulam R (1977). “Cannabidiol”. Acta Cryst. B33 (10): [65] “KannaLife in R&D Collaboration for Cannabinoid-
3211–3214. doi:10.1107/S0567740877010577. Based Drugs”. Genengnews.com. Retrieved 2013-04-04.
[49] Mechoulam R, Ben-Zvi Z (1968). “Hashish—XIII On the
nature of the beam test”. Tetrahedron 24 (16): 5615–
5624. doi:10.1016/0040-4020(68)88159-1. PMID 63.10 External links
5732891.
[50] Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R (1966). “Hashish—VII The • Project CBD Non-profit educational service dedi-
isomerization of cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinols”. cated to promoting and publicizing research into the
Tetrahedron 22 (4): 1481–1488. doi:10.1016/S0040- medical utility of cannabidiol.
4020(01)99446-3.
[54] Marks, M.; Tian, L.; Wenger, J.; Omburo, S.; Soto-
Fuentes, W.; He, J.; Gang, D.; Weiblen, G.; Dixon,
R. (2009). “Identification of candidate genes affect-
ing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol biosynthesis in Cannabis
sativa”. Journal of Experimental Botany 60 (13): 3715–
3726. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp210. PMC 2736886. PMID
19581347.
Chapter 64
Cannabidivarin
• Cannabis
• Medical marijuana
64.2 References
[1] Turner, C.E., P. C. Cheng, G.S. Lewis, M.H.Russell and
G.K. Sharma. 1979. Constituents of Cannabis sativa XV:
Botanical and chemical profile of Indian variants. Planta
medica 37(3): 217-225.
90
Chapter 65
Cannabigerol
65.2 References
[1] Cascio MG, Gauson LA, Stevenson LA, Ross RA, Per-
twee R (December 2009). “Evidence that the plant
cannabinoid cannabigerol is a highly potent alpha(2)-
adrenoceptor agonist and moderately potent 5HT recep-
tor antagonist”. British Journal of Pharmacology 159
(1): 129–141. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00515.x.
PMC 2823359. PMID 20002104.
[2] Colasanti, B. (1990). “A comparison of the ocular
and central effects of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and
cannabigerol”. Journal of ocular pharmacology 6 (4):
259–269. doi:10.1089/jop.1990.6.259. PMID 1965836.
[3] Colasanti, B.; Craig, C.; Allara, R. (1984). “Intraocu-
lar pressure, ocular toxicity and neurotoxicity after ad-
ministration of cannabinol or cannabigerol”. Experimen-
tal eye research 39 (3): 251–259. doi:10.1016/0014-
4835(84)90013-7. PMID 6499952.
91
Chapter 66
Cannabinoidergic
• Cholinergic
• GABAergic
• Glutamatergic
• Glycinergic
• Histaminergic
• Monoaminergic
• Opioidergic
66.2 References
[1] Palmer, SL; Thakur GA; Makriyannis A (December
31, 2002). “Cannabinergic ligands”. Chemistry and
physics of lipids 121 (1-2): 3–19. doi:10.1016/s0009-
3084(02)00143-3. PMID 12505686.
92
Chapter 67
Cannabinol
Not to be confused with Cannabidiol. [8] Petitet F, Jeantaud B, Reibaud M, Imperato A, Dubroeucq
MC (1998). “Complex pharmacology of natural cannabi-
noids: evidence for partial agonist activity of delta9-
Cannabinol (CBN) is a weak psychoactive cannabinoid tetrahydrocannabinol and antagonist activity of cannabid-
found only in trace amounts in Cannabis sativa iol on rat brain cannabinoid receptors”. Life Sciences
and Cannabis indica.[5] It is mostly a metabolite of 63 (1): PL1–6. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00238-0.
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).[6] CBN acts as a weak PMID 9667767.
agonist of CB1 receptors but has a higher affinity to
CB2 receptors, with lower affinities in comparison to
THC.[7][8] Because of its somewhat selective CB2 ago- 67.3 External links
nism, it is used experimentally as an immunosuppressant.
In contrast to tetrahydrocannabinol, it has no double • Erowid Compounds found in Cannabis sativa
bond isomers nor stereoisomers. It is not scheduled by
Convention on Psychotropic Substances.
67.2 References
[1] Cannabinol in the ChemIDplus database.
93
Chapter 68
Cannabivarin
68.1 References
[1] Keith Bailey, Denise Gagné (October 1975). “Distinction
of synthetic cannabidiol, cannabichromene, and cannabi-
varin by GLC using on-column methylation”. Jour-
nal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 64 (10): 1719–1720.
doi:10.1002/jps.2600641033.
• Medical marijuana
94
Chapter 69
Caryophyllene
The first total synthesis of caryophyllene in 1964 by E.J. • Cananga odorata [3.1%−10.7%][28]
Corey was considered one of the classic demonstrations
of the possibilities of synthetic organic chemistry at the • Copaiba oil (Copaifera spp.) [29][30][31][32]
time.[9]
Caryophyllene oxide is the component responsible for
cannabis identification by drug-sniffing dogs[10][11] 69.2 Compendial status
• Food Chemical Codex [33], [34]
69.1 Natural sources
The approximate quantity of caryophyllene in the 69.3 Notes and references
essential oil of each source is given in square brackets
([ ]): [1] Ghelardini C, Galeotti N, Di Cesare Mannelli L, Maz-
zanti G, Bartolini A (2001). “Local anaesthetic ac-
tivity of beta-caryophyllene”. Farmaco 56 (5–7):
• Cannabis, hemp, marijuana (Cannabis sativa)[2] 387–9. doi:10.1016/S0014-827X(01)01092-8. PMID
[3.8–37.5% of cannabis flower essential oil][12] 11482764.
95
96 CHAPTER 69. CARYOPHYLLENE
[2] Gertsch J, Leonti M, Raduner S, et al. (July 2008). [13] Singh G, Marimuthu P, de Heluani CS, Catalan CA (Jan-
“Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid”. Pro- uary 2006). “Antioxidant and biocidal activities of Carum
ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of nigrum (seed) essential oil, oleoresin, and their selected
the United States of America 105 (26): 9099–104. components”. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (1): 174–81.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0803601105. PMC 2449371. PMID doi:10.1021/jf0518610. PMID 16390196.
18574142.
[14] Alma, M. Hakkı; Ertaş, Murat; Nitz, Siegfrie; Koll-
[3] Ormeño E, Baldy V, Ballini C, Fernandez C (Septem- mannsberger, Hubert (May 2007). Lucia, Lucian A.;
ber 2008). “Production and diversity of volatile ter- Hubbe, Martin A., eds. “Chemical composition and con-
penes from plants on calcareous and siliceous soils: ef- tent of essential oil from the bud of cultivated Turk-
fect of soil nutrients”. J. Chem. Ecol. 34 (9): 1219–29. ish clove” (PDF). BioResources (Raleigh, North Carolina,
doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9515-2. PMID 18670820. USA: North Carolina State University) 2 (2): 265–269.
ISSN 1930-2126. Retrieved September 6, 2010. “The re-
[4] Glenn Tinseth, “Hop Aroma and Flavor”, Jan- sults showed that the essential oils mainly contained about
uary/February 1993, Brewing Techniques. [...] 3.56% β-Caryophyllene”
<http://realbeer.com/hops/aroma.html> Accessed
July 21, 2010. [15] Clove Essential Oil
[5] Katsuyama S., Mizoguchi H., Kuwahata H., et al. [16] Wang G, Tian L, Aziz N, et al. (November
(2013). “Involvement of peripheral cannabinoid and 2008). “Terpene Biosynthesis in Glandular Tri-
opioid receptors in β-caryophyllene-induced antinocicep- chomes of Hop”. Plant Physiol. 148 (3): 1254–66.
tion”. European journal of pain 17 (5): 664–675. doi:10.1104/pp.108.125187. PMC 2577278. PMID
doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00242.x. 18775972.
[6] Guimarães-Santos, Adriano (2012). “Copaiba Oil- [17] Bernotienë, Genovaitë; Nivinskienë, Ona; Butkienë, Rita;
Resin Treatment Is Neuroprotective and Reduces Neu- Mockutë, Danutë (2004). “Chemical composition of es-
trophil Recruitment and Microglia Activation after sential oils of hops (Humulus lupulus L.) growing wild in
Motor Cortex Excitotoxic Injury”. Evidence-Based Auk taitija”. Chemija. 2 (Vilnius, Lithuania: Lithuanian
Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012: 1–9. Academy of Sciences) 4: 31–36. ISSN 0235-7216. Re-
doi:10.1155/2012/918174. PMC 3291111. trieved September 6, 2010.
[7] Bahi Amine, Al Mansouri Shamma, Al Memari Elyazia, [18] Zheljazkov VD, Cantrell CL, Tekwani B, Khan SI (Jan-
Al Ameri Mouza, Nurulain Syed M., Ojha Shreesh. uary 2008). “Content, composition, and bioactivity of
(2014). "β-Caryophyllene, a CB2 receptor agonist pro- the essential oils of three basil genotypes as a function
duces multiple behavioral changes relevant to anxiety and of harvesting”. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56 (2): 380–5.
depression in mice.”. Physiology & behavior 135: 119– doi:10.1021/jf0725629. PMID 18095647.
124. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.06.003.
[19] Silva, Maria Goretti de Vasconcelos; Matos, Francisco
[8] Al Mansouri Shamma, Ojha Shreesh, Al Maamari José de Abreu; Lopes, Paulo Roberto Oliveira; Silva,
Elyazia, Al Ameri Mouza, Nurulain Syed M., Bahi Fábio Oliveira; Holanda, Márcio Tavares (August 2,
Amine. (2014). “The cannabinoid receptor 2 ag- 2004). Cragg, Gordon M.; Bolzani, Vanderlan S.; Rao,
onist, β-caryophyllene, reduced voluntary alcohol in- G. S. R. Subba, eds. “Composition of essential oils
take and attenuated ethanol-induced place preference from three Ocimum species obtained by steam and mi-
and sensitivity in mice.”. Pharmacology, biochem- crowave distillation and supercritical CO2 extraction”
istry, and behavior. 2014;124C:260-268 124: 260–268. (PDF). Arkivoc (ARKAT USA, Inc.) 2004 (vi): 66–71.
doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2014.06.025. doi:10.3998/ark.5550190.0005.609. ISSN 1424-6376.
Retrieved September 6, 2010.
[9] Corey EJ, Mitra RB, Uda H (1964). “Total Synthe-
sis of d,l-Caryophyllene and d,l-Isocaryophyllene”. Jour- [20] Harvala C, Menounos P, Argyriadou N (February 1987).
nal of the American Chemical Society 86 (3): 485–492. “Essential Oil from Origanum dictamnus”. Planta Med.
doi:10.1021/ja01057a040. 53 (1): 107–9. doi:10.1055/s-2006-962640. PMID
17268981.
[10] Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and
phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects Ethan [21] Calvo-Irabien, L. M.; Yam-Puc, J. A.; Dzib, G.;
B Russo. Br J Pharmacol. 2011 August; 163(7): Escalante-Erosa, F.; Peña-Rodriguez, L. M. (July
1344–1364. 2009). “Effect of Postharvest Drying on the Compo-
sition of Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens) Essen-
[11] Stahl E, Kunde R. Die Leitsubstanzen der Haschisch- tial Oil”. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants
Suchhunde. Kriminalistik: Z Gesamte Kriminal Wiss (London, UK: Taylor & Francis) 15 (3): 281–287.
Prax. 1973;27:385–389. doi:10.1080/10496470903379001. ISSN 1540-3580.
[12] Mediavilla, Vito; Simon Steinemann. “Essential oil of [22] The essential oil of Origanum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare
Cannabis sativa L. strains”. International Hemp Associa- growing wild in vilnius district (Lithuania) Phytochem-
tion. Retrieved 11 July 2008. istry. 2001 May;57(1):65-9.
69.3. NOTES AND REFERENCES 97
[31] http://staff.najah.edu/sites/default/files/Within_plant_
distribution_and_emission_of_sesquiterpenes_from_
Copaifera_officinalis.pdf
[32] http://www.rain-tree.com/copaiba.htm
CB-13
• AZ-11713908
70.2 References
[1] Cluny, N. L.; Keenan, C. M.; Duncan, M.; Fox, A.;
Lutz, B.; Sharkey, K. A. (2010). “Naphthalen-1-yl-
(4-pentyloxynaphthalen-1-yl)methanone (SAB378), a Pe-
ripherally Restricted Cannabinoid CB1/CB2 Receptor
Agonist, Inhibits Gastrointestinal Motility but Has No Ef-
fect on Experimental Colitis in Mice”. Journal of Phar-
macology and Experimental Therapeutics 334 (3): 973.
doi:10.1124/jpet.110.169946. PMID 20571060.
98
Chapter 71
CBS-0550
71.2 References
[1] Ohta H, et al. Imine derivatives as new potent and selec-
tive CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonists with an analgesic
action. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2008 Feb
1;16(3):1111-24. PMID 18006322
99
Chapter 72
CP 47,497
72.2.6 Romania
100
72.4. REFERENCES 101
[18] https://federalregister.gov/a/2011-4428
[2] Shim JY, Welsh WJ, Howlett AC. Homology model of
the CB1 cannabinoid receptor: sites critical for non-
classical cannabinoid agonist interaction. Biopolymers.
2003;71(2):169-89. PMID 12767117
[8] Compton DR, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Martin BR. Phar-
macological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid
analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents. Journal
of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1992
Jan;260(1):201-9. PMID 1309872
CP 55,244
73.2 References
[1] Griffin G, Wray EJ, Martin BR, Abood ME. Cannabinoid
agonists and antagonists discriminated by receptor bind-
ing in rat cerebellum. British Journal of Pharmacology.
1999 Oct;128(3):684-8. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702806
PMID 10516649
102
Chapter 74
CP 55,940
CP 55,940 is a cannabinoid which mimics the effects of of binding sites for [3 H]-SR 141716A, a selective brain
naturally occurring THC (one of the psychoactive com- (CB1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist, in rodent brain”.
pounds found in cannabis). CP 55,940 was created by Life Sciences 58 (15): 1239–1247. doi:10.1016/0024-
Pfizer in 1974 but was never marketed. It is currently 3205(96)00085-9. PMID 8614277.
used to study the endocannabinoid system. Some effects [3] Kapur, A.; Zhao, P.; Sharir, H.; Bai, Y.; Caron, M. G.;
that have been noted are a greatly decreased rates of lever Barak, L. S.; Abood, M. E. (2009). “Atypical respon-
pressing in exposed mice, and a greater reaction to opi- siveness of the orphan receptor GPR55 to cannabinoid
ates in exposed mice. ligands”. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 (43):
29817–29827. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.050187. PMC
A study found that CP 55,940 can upregulate 5-HT2A
2785612. PMID 19723626.
receptors in mice.[1]
CP 55,940 is 45 times more potent than Δ9 -THC, and [4] Velez-Pardo, C.; Jimenez-Del-Rio, M.; Lores-Arnaiz, S.;
Bustamante, J. (2010). “Protective effects of the syn-
fully antagonized by rimonabant (SR141716A).[2]
thetic cannabinoids CP55,940 and JWH-015 on rat brain
CP 55,940 is considered a full agonist at both CB1 and mitochondria upon paraquat exposure”. Neurochemical
CB2 receptors and has Kᵢ values of 0.58nM and 0.68nM Research 35 (9): 1323–1332. doi:10.1007/s11064-010-
respectively, but is an antagonist at GPR55, the putative 0188-1. PMID 20514518.
“CB3 " receptor.[3] [5] Zhuang, S. Y.; Bridges, D.; Grigorenko, E.; Mc-
CP 55,940 showed protective effects on rat brain mito- Cloud, S.; Boon, A.; Hampson, R. E.; Deadwyler, S.
chondria upon paraquat exposure.[4] A. (2005). “Cannabinoids produce neuroprotection by
reducing intracellular calcium release from ryanodine-
It also showed neuroprotective effects by reducing intra- sensitive stores”. Neuropharmacology 48 (8): 1086–
cellular calcium release and reducing hippocampal cell 1096. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.01.005. PMID
death in cultured neurons subjected to high levels of 15910885.
NMDA.[5]
[6] Tomiyama, K.; Funada, M. (2011). “Cytotoxicity of syn-
CP 55,940 induced cell death in NG 108-15 Mouse neu- thetic cannabinoids found in 'Spice' products: The role
roblastoma x Rat glioma hybrid brain cancer (genetically of cannabinoid receptors and the caspase cascade in the
engineered mouse x rat brain cancer) cells.[6][7] NG 108-15 cell line”. Toxicology Letters 207 (1): 12–17.
doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.021. PMID 21907772.
• CP 47,497
74.2 References
[1] Franklin, J. M.; Carrasco, G. A. (2013). “Cannabi-
noid receptor agonists upregulate and enhance serotonin
2A (5-HT₂A) receptor activity via ERK1/2 signaling”.
Synapse 67 (3): 145–159. doi:10.1002/syn.21626. PMID
23151877.
103
Chapter 75
Dexanabinol
Dexanabinol (HU-211 or ETS2101[1] ) is a synthetic [8] University of California, San Diego "Synthetic Cannabi-
cannabinoid derivative that is the “unnatural” enantiomer noid May Be Used as Brain Cancer Treatment". (28
of the potent cannabinoid agonist HU-210.[2] Unlike September 2012) Laboratory Equipment. Retrieved 28
other cannabinoid derivatives, HU-211 does not act as a September 2012.
cannabinoid receptor agonist, but instead has NMDA an-
tagonist effects.[3] It therefore does not produce cannabis-
like effects, but is anticonvulsant and neuroprotective,
and is widely used in scientific research as well as cur-
rently being studied for practical applications such as
treatment of head injury or stroke or cancer.[4][5][6] It was
shown to be safe in clinical trials[7] and is currently under-
going Phase I trials for the treatment of brain cancer.[8]
75.1 References
[1] e-therapeutics Clinical Development Pipeline
104
Chapter 76
Dimethylheptylpyran
Dimethylheptylpyran (DMHP, 3-(1,2- ducing the active metabolite 11-hydroxy-DMHP, but the
dimethylheptyl)-Δ6a,10a -THC, 1,2-dimethylheptyl- lipophilicity of DMHP is even higher than that of THC
Δ3 THC, A-40824, EA-1476) is a synthetic analogue of itself, giving it a long duration of action and an ex-
THC, which was invented in 1949 during attempts to tended half-life in the body of between 20–39 hours, with
elucidate the structure of Δ9 -THC, the active component the half-life of the 11-hydroxy-DMHP metabolite being
of cannabis.[1] DMHP is a pale yellow, viscous oil which longer than 48 hours.
is insoluble in water, but dissolves in alcohol or non-polar Cannabinoids as a class are generally safe compounds
solvents.
with a large safety margin, making potent cannabi-
noid drugs ideal as potential non-lethal incapacitating
agents. DMHP and its esters produce sedation and
76.1 Effects mild hallucinogenic effects similar to large doses of
THC, but in addition to this they also cause pronounced
DMHP is similar in structure to THC, differing only in hypotension (low blood pressure) which occurs at doses
the position of one double bond, and the replacement of well below the hallucinogenic dose, and can lead to severe
the 3-pentyl chain with a 3-(1,2-dimethylheptyl) chain.[2] dizziness, fainting, ataxia and muscle weakness, sufficient
It produces similar activity to THC, such as sedative ef- to make it difficult to stand upright or carry out any kind
fects, but is considerably more potent,[3] especially having of vigorous physical activity (an effect known colloqui-
much stronger analgesic and anticonvulsant effects than ally as “couch lock”). The acute toxicity of DMHP was
THC, although comparatively weaker psychological ef- found to be low in both human and animal studies, with
fects. It is thought to act as a CB1 agonist, in a similar the ratio of ED50 to LD50 (Therapeutic Index) in animals
manner to other cannabinoid derivatives.[4] being around 2000x, with death ultimately resulting from
a combination of hypotension and hypothermia and pre-
ventable with supportive treatment.
76.2 Investigation as non-lethal in- The combination of strong incapacitating effects and a
capacitating agent favourable safety margin led the Edgewood Arsenal team
to conclude that DMHP and its derivatives, especially
the O-acetyl ester of the most active isomer, EA-2233-2,
DMHP and its O-acetate ester were extensively inves- were among the more promising non-lethal incapacitating
tigated by the US military chemical weapons program agents to come out of their research program. However
in the Edgewood Arsenal experiments, as possible non- they were disadvantaged by producing severe hypoten-
lethal incapacitating agents.[5] sion at incapacitating doses, and were not as effective as
DMHP has three stereocenters and consequently has the more widely publicised anticholinergic agents such
eight possible stereoisomers, which differ considerably as 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate which had also already been
in potency. The racemic mix of all eight isomers of weaponised.[6] Funding for continued development was
the O-acetyl ester was given the code number EA-2233, ultimately not approved, and the cannabinoid research
with the eight individual isomers numbered EA-2233-1 program was indefinitely suspended along with the rest
through EA-2233-8. The most potent isomer was EA- of the Edgewood Arsenal experiments in the late 1970s,
2233-2, with an active dose range in humans of 0.5–2.8 in accordance with the US commitment to cease research
μg/kg (i.e. ~35–200 μg for a 70 kg adult). Active doses into chemical weapons under disarmament treaties.
varied markedly between individuals, but when the dose
of EA-2233 was taken up to 1–2 mg, all volunteers were
considered to be incapable of performing military duties,
with the effects lasting as long as 2–3 days.
DMHP is metabolised in a similar manner to THC, pro-
105
106 CHAPTER 76. DIMETHYLHEPTYLPYRAN
76.3 Isomerism
Note that 6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-1-ol is the same as 6H-
benzo[c]chromen-1-ol.
See also: Tetrahydrocannabinol § Isomerism
76.4 References
[1] Adams R, Harfenist M, Loewe S (1949). Jour-
nal of the American Chemical Society 71 (5): 1624.
doi:10.1021/ja01173a023.
Docosatetraenoylethanolamide
77.1 References
[1] Hanus, L., Gopher, A., Almog, S., et al. (1993). “Two
new unsaturated fatty acid ethanolamides in brain that
bind to the cannabinoid receptor”. J Med Chem 36
(20): 3032–3034. doi:10.1021/jm00072a026. PMID
8411021.
107
Chapter 78
Drinabant
Drinabant (INN; AVE-1625) is a drug that acts as a receptor 1 antagonists as anti-obesity agents”. Cur-
selective CB1 receptor antagonist, which was under in- rent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 9 (6): 482–503.
vestigation varyingly by Sanofi-Aventis as a treatment for doi:10.2174/156802609788897844. PMID 19689362.
obesity, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s
disease, and nicotine dependence.[1][2][3] Though initially
studied as a potential treatment for a variety of differ-
ent medical conditions, Sanofi-Aventis eventually nar-
rowed down the therapeutic indications of the compound
to just appetite suppression. Drinabant reached phase IIb
clinical trials for this purpose in the treatment of obe-
sity but was shortly thereafter discontinued,[4] likely due
to the observation of severe psychiatric side effects in-
cluding anxiety, depression, and thoughts of suicide in
patients treated with the now-withdrawn rimonabant, an-
other CB1 antagonist that was also under development by
Sanofi-Aventis.[5]
78.2 References
[1] Lange JH, Kruse CG (2008). “Cannabinoid CB1 re-
ceptor antagonists in therapeutic and structural perspec-
tives”. Chemical Record (New York, N.Y.) 8 (3): 156–68.
doi:10.1002/tcr.20147. PMID 18563799.
[5] Lee HK, Choi EB, Pak CS (2009). “The current sta-
tus and future perspectives of studies of cannabinoid
108
Chapter 79
EAM-2201
79.3 Detection
A forensic standard of EAM-2201 is available and com-
monly used in mass spectrometry, and the compound has
been cited on the Forendex website of potential drugs of
abuse.[4][5]
109
Chapter 80
Endocannabinoid reuptake inhibitors (eCBRIs), also docannabinoid system using VDM-11 and AA-5-HT re-
called cannabinoid reuptake inhibitors (CBRIs), are duced the ultimate size of the tumors in the treated rats.
drugs which limit or completely stop the reabsorption These findings suggest that the use of cannabinoids and/or
of endocannabinoid neurotransmitters into their corre- eCBR inhibitors could be used to effectively treat tumors
sponding pre-synaptic neurons. and/or cancer, which only adds to the controversy around
cannabinoids and the cannabis plant as medicine.
As one might expect, combining a cannabinoid receptor
80.1 Etymology antagonist with an eCBRI reverses the effects of the re-
uptake inhibitor, and therefore could hinder treatment.
There are several parts to the phrase endocannabinoid Cannabinoid receptor antagonists aren't something com-
reuptake inhibitor. First, a reuptake inhibitor is a sub- mon, so normally this isn't something to worry about. But
stance that prevents its respective neurotransmitters from if smoked cannabis or cannabis extract is to be used as
being reabsorbed into the pre-sypnatic neurones, which a treatment, it would be necessary to cultivate varieties
makes them continually recycle themselves, thus creating with little to no amounts of these compounds, as they are
a large increase in neurotransmission. Next, a cannabi- found in low concentrations in most varieties. One exam-
noid is simply a class of closely related substances such as ple of these antagonist compounds which is found in the
Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol. 'Endo' is a pre- cannabis plant is THCV (tetrahydrocannabivarin).
fix used to describe a cannabinoid that is naturally found
within an animal. In retrospect, an endocannabinoid re-
uptake inhibitor is a substance that when ingested by an 80.4 Examples of eCBRIs
animal prevents reuptake of its endogenous cannabinoids.
Endocannabinoid uptake inhibitors that bind to fatty acid
binding protons (FABPs) have been described. • AM404
• O-2093
• Endocannabinoid system
80.3 Use in medicine
• Reuptake inhibitor
Other than toxicity research and recreational use, eCBRIs
could have some potential in fighting tumors and pos- • Cannabinoid receptor antagonist
sibly cancer. A study done in 2004 on rats with thy-
roid tumors showed that reuptake inhibition of the en- • Endocannabinoid transporters
110
80.6. REFERENCES 111
80.6 References
1. http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/full/18/13/1606
2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16770320
3. PLOS ONE
Chapter 81
Endocannabinoid system
The endocannabinoid system is a group of neuromod- that cannabinoids will have in modulating specific aspects
ulatory lipids and their receptors in the brain that are in-
of behavior related to the site of expression. For example,
volved in a variety of physiological processes includingin rodents, the highest concentration of cannabinoid bind-
appetite, pain-sensation, mood, and memory; it mediates ing sites are in the basal ganglia and cerebellum, regions
the psychoactive effects of cannabis and, broadly speak- of the brain involved in the initiation and coordination of
ing, includes: movement.[10] In humans, cannabinoid receptors exist in
much lower concentration in these regions, which helps
• The endogenous arachidonate-based lipids, explain why cannabinoids possess a greater efficacy in al-
anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamide, AEA) tering rodent motor movements than they do in humans.
and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG); these are A recent analysis of cannabinoid binding in CB1 and
known as "endocannabinoids" and are physio- CB2 receptor knockout-mice found cannabinoid respon-
logical ligands for the cannabinoid receptors. siveness even when these receptors were not being ex-
Endocannabinoids are all eicosanoids.[1] pressed, indicating that an additional binding receptor
may be present in the brain.[10] Binding has been demon-
• The enzymes that synthesize and degrade the endo- strated by 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) on the TRPV1
cannabinoids, such as fatty acid amide hydrolase or receptor suggesting that this receptor may be a candidate
monoacylglycerol lipase. for the established response.[11]
• The cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 , two G
protein-coupled receptors that are located in the
central and peripheral nervous systems. 81.1.2 Endocannabinoid synthesis, re-
lease, and degradation
The endocannabinoid system has been studied using ge-
netic and pharmacological methods. These studies have During neurotransmission, the pre-synaptic neuron re-
revealed that cannabinoids act as neuromodulators[2][3][4] leases neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft which bind
for a variety of physiological processes, including motor to cognate receptors expressed on the post-synaptic neu-
learning,[5] synaptic plasticity,[6] appetite,[7] and pain ron. Based upon the interaction between the transmitter
sensation.[8] and receptor, neurotransmitters may trigger a variety of
effects in the post-synaptic cell, such as excitation, in-
hibition, or the initiation of second messenger cascades.
Based on the cell, these effects may result in the on-
81.1 Basic overview site synthesis of endogenous cannabinoids anandamide
or 2-AG by a process that is not entirely clear, but re-
81.1.1 Expression of receptors sults from an elevation in intracellular calcium.[9] Expres-
sion appears to be exclusive, so that both types of endo-
For a more thorough description on receptor localization, cannabinoids are not co-synthesized. This exclusion is
see Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1 ) and Cannabinoid based on synthesis-specific channel activation: a recent
receptor type 2 (CB2 ). study found that in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis,
calcium entry through voltage-sensitive calcium channels
Cannabinoid binding sites exist throughout the central produced an L-type current resulting in 2-AG produc-
and peripheral nervous systems. The two most rele- tion, while activation of mGluR1/5 receptors triggered
vant receptors for cannabinoids are the CB1 and CB2 re- the synthesis of anandamide.[11]
ceptors, which are expressed predominantly in the brain Evidence suggests that the depolarization-induced influx
and immune system respectively.[9] Density of expression of calcium into the post-synaptic neuron causes the ac-
varies based on species and correlates with the efficacy tivation of an enzyme called transacylase. This enzyme
112
81.1. BASIC OVERVIEW 113
is suggested to catalyze the first step of endocannabinoid but also the PI3/PKB and MEK/ERK pathway (Galve-
biosynthesis by converting phosphatidylethanolamine, Roperh et al., 2002; Davis et al., 2005; Jones et al.,
a membrane-resident phospholipid, into N-acyl- 2005; Graham et al., 2006). Results from rat hip-
phosphatidylethanolamine (NAPE). Experiments pocampal gene chip data after acute administration of
have shown that phospholipase D cleaves NAPE to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) showed an increase in the
yield anandamide.[12][13] In NAPE-phospholipase D expression of transcripts encoding myelin basic protein,
(NAPEPLD)-knockout mice, cleavage of NAPE is re- endoplasmic proteins, cytochrome oxidase, and two cell
duced in low calcium concentrations, but not abolished, adhesion molecules: NCAM, and SC1; decreases in ex-
suggesting multiple, distinct pathways are involved in pression were seen in both calmodulin and ribosomal
anandamide synthesis.[14] The synthesis of 2-AG is less RNAs (Kittler et al., 2000). In addition, CB1 activation
established and warrants further research. has been demonstrated to increase the activity of tran-
Once released into the extracellular space by a puta- scription factors like c-Fos and Krox-24 (Graham et al.,
2006).
tive endocannabinoid transporter, messengers are vul-
nerable to glial cell inactivation. Endocannabinoids are
taken up by a transporter on the glial cell and degraded
by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), which cleaves 81.1.4 Binding and neuronal excitability
anandamide into arachidonic acid and ethanolamine or
monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), and 2-AG into arachi- The molecular mechanisms of CB1 -mediated changes
donic acid and glycerol.[15] While arachidonic acid is a to the membrane voltage have also been studied in de-
substrate for leukotriene and prostaglandin synthesis, it tail. CB1 agonists reduce calcium influx by blocking
is unclear whether this degradative byproduct has novel the activity of voltage-dependent
[19][20]
N-, P/Q- and L-type
functions in the central nervous system. [16][17]
Emerging calcium channels. In addition to acting on cal-
data in the field also points to FAAH being expressed cium channels, activation of Gi/o and Gs, the two most
in postsynaptic neurons complementary to presynaptic commonly coupled G-proteins to cannabinoid receptors,
neurons expressing cannabinoid receptors, supporting the has been shown to modulate potassium channel activity.
conclusion that it is major contributor to the clearance Recent studies have found that CB 1 activation specif-
and inactivation of anandamide and 2-AG after endo- ically facilitates GIRK, a potassium channel belonging
[20]
cannabinoid reuptake.[10] A neuropharmacological study to the Kir3 family. Both Guo & Ikeda and Binzen et
demonstrated that an inhibitor of FAAH (URB597) se- al. performed a series of immunohistochemistry exper-
lectively increases anandamide levels in the brain of ro- iments that demonstrated CB1 co-localized with GIRK
dents and primates. Such approaches could lead to the and Kv1.4 potassium channels, suggesting that these two
[21]
development of new drugs with analgesic, anxiolytic-like may interact in physiological contexts.
and antidepressant-like effects, which are not accompa- In the central nervous system, CB1 receptors influence
nied by overt signs of abuse liability.[18] neuronal excitability, reducing the incoming synaptic
[22]
Notably, a series of recent studies have found that the input. This mechanism, known as presynaptic inhi-
expression of endocannabinoids does not correlate with bition, occurs when a postsynaptic neuron releases en-
the distribution of cannabinoid receptors in the brain, docannabinoids in retrograde transmission, which then
suggesting that these molecules may also be interact- bind to cannabinoid receptors on the presynaptic termi-
ing with other receptors or be involved with other cell nal. CB 1 receptors then reduce the amount of neurotrans-
processes. [10] mitter released, so that subsequent excitation in the presy-
naptic neuron results in diminished effects on the postsy-
naptic neuron. It is likely that presynaptic inhibition uses
81.1.3 Binding and intracellular effects many of the same ion channel mechanisms listed above,
although recent evidence has shown that CB1 receptors
Cannabinoid receptors are G-protein coupled receptors can also regulate neurotransmitter release by a non-ion
located on the pre-synaptic membrane. While there have channel mechanism, i.e. through Gi/o-mediated inhibi-
been some papers that have linked concurrent stimula- tion of adenylyl cyclase and Protein Kinase A.[23] Still,
tion of dopamine and CB1 receptors to an acute rise in direct effects of CB1 receptors on membrane excitabil-
cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, it ity have been reported, and strongly impact the firing of
is generally accepted that CB1 activation via cannabi- cortical neurons[24] In a series of behavioral experiments,
noids causes a decrease in cAMP concentration by inhi- Palazzo et al. demonstrated that NMDA, an ionotropic
bition of adenylyl cyclase and a rise in the concentration glutamate receptor, and the metabotropic glutamate re-
of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase).[1][10] ceptors (mGluRs) work in concert with CB1 to induce
The relative potency of different cannabinoids in inhi- analgesia in mice, although the mechanism underlying
bition of adenylyl cyclase correlates with their varying this effect is unclear. Together, these findings suggest that
efficacy in behavioral assays. This inhibition of cAMP CB1 influences neuronal excitability by a variety of mech-
is followed by phosphorylation and subsequent activa- anisms, and these effects are relevant to perception and
tion of not only a suite of MAP kinases (p38/p42/p44), behavior.
114 CHAPTER 81. ENDOCANNABINOID SYSTEM
81.2 Functions of the endocannabi- ilar post-synaptic receptor dependencies were found in
the striatum, but here both effects relied on presynaptic
noid system CB1 receptors.[11] These findings provide the brain a di-
rect mechanism to selectively inhibit neuronal excitabil-
81.2.1 Memory ity over variable time scales. By selectively internalizing
different receptors, the brain may limit the production of
Mice treated with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) show sup- specific endocannabinoids to favor a time scale in accor-
pression of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus, a dance with its needs.
process that is essential for the formation and storage of
long-term memory.[25] These results concur with anec-
dotal evidence suggesting that smoking Cannabis impairs
short-term memory.[26] Consistent with this finding, mice
without the CB1 receptor show enhanced memory and 81.2.2 Appetite
long-term potentiation indicating that the endocannabi-
noid system may play a pivotal role in the extinction of old Evidence for the role of the endocannabinoid system in
memories. In contrast, a recent study found that the high- food-seeking behavior comes from a variety of cannabi-
dose treatment of rats with the synthetic cannabinoid HU- noid studies. Emerging data suggests that THC acts via
210 over several weeks resulted in stimulation of neural CB1 receptors in the hypothalamic nuclei to directly in-
growth in the rats’ hippocampus region, a part of the lim- crease appetite.[30] It is thought that hypothalamic neu-
bic system playing a part in the formation of declarative rons tonically produce endocannabinoids that work to
and spatial memories.[27] Taken together, these findings tightly regulate hunger. The amount of endocannabi-
suggest that the effects of endocannabinoids on memory noids produced is inversely correlated with the amount of
are dependent on what type of neurons are being targeted leptin in the blood.[31] For example, mice without leptin
(excitatory vs. inhibitory) and the location of these net- not only become massively obese but express abnormally
works in the brain. high levels of hypothalamic endocannabinoids as a com-
pensatory mechanism.[7] Similarly, when these mice were
treated with an endocannabinoid inverse agonists, such as
Role in hippocampal neurogenesis
rimonabant, food intake was reduced.[7] When the CB1
receptor is knocked-out in mice, these animals tend to
In the adult brain, the endocannabinoid system facilitates
be leaner and less hungry than wild-type mice. A related
the neurogenesis of hippocampal granule cells.[27][28] In
study examined the effect of THC on the hedonic (plea-
the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus, multipotent
sure) value of food and found enhanced dopamine release
neural progenitors (NP) give rise to daughter cells that,
in the nucleus accumbens and increased pleasure-related
over the course of several weeks, mature into granule
behavior after administration of a sucrose solution.[32]
cells whose axons project to and synapse onto dendrites
A related study found that endocannabinoids affect taste
on the CA3 region.[29] NPs in the hippocampus have been
perception in taste cells[33] In taste cells, endocannabi-
shown to possess fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and
noids were shown to selectively enhance the strength of
express CB1 and utilize 2-AG.[28] Intriguingly, CB1 ac-
neural signaling for sweet tastes, whereas leptin decreased
tivation by endogenous or exogenous cannabinoids pro-
the strength of this same response. While there is need
mote NP proliferation and differentiation; this activation
for more research, these results suggest that cannabinoid
is absent in CB1 knockouts and abolished in the presence
activity in the hypothalamus and nucleus accumbens is
of antagonist.[27][28]
related to appetitive, food-seeking behavior.[30]
While the secretion of glucocorticoids in response to Evidence suggests that endocannabinoids may function as
stressful stimuli is an adaptive response necessary for both neuromodulators and immunomodulators in the im-
an organism to respond appropriately to a stressor, per- mune system. Here, they seem to serve an autoprotec-
sistent secretion may be harmful. The endocannabi- tive role to ameliorate muscle spasms, inflammation, and
noid system has been implicated in the habituation of other symptoms of multiple sclerosis and skeletal mus-
the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) to re- cle spasms.[1] Functionally, the activation of cannabinoid
peated exposure to restraint stress. Studies have demon- receptors has been demonstrated to play a role in the
strated differential synthesis of anandamide and 2-AG activation of GTPases in macrophages, neutrophils, and
during tonic stress. A decrease of anandamide was found BM cells. These receptors have also been implicated in
along the axis that contributed to basal hypersecretion the proper migration of B cells into the marginal zone
of corticosterone; in contrast, an increase of 2-AG was (MZ) and the regulation of healthy IgM levels.[37] Inter-
found in the amygdala after repeated stress, which was estingly, some disorders seem to trigger an upregulation
negatively correlated to magnitude of the corticosterone of cannabinoid receptors selectively in cells or tissues re-
response. All effects were abolished by the CB1 antago- lated to symptom relief and inhibition of disease progres-
nist AM251, supporting the conclusion that these effects sion, such as in that rodent neuropathic pain model, where
were cannabinoid-receptor dependent.[35] These findings receptors are increased in the spinal cord microglia, dor-
show that anandamide and 2-AG divergently regulate the sal root ganglion, and thalmic neurons.[9]
HPA axis response to stress: while habituation of the
stress-induced HPA axis via 2-AG prevents excessive se-
cretion of glucocorticoids to non-threatening stimuli, the
increase of basal corticosterone secretion resulting from
decreased anandamide allows for a facilitated response of Multiple sclerosis
the HPA axis to novel stimuli.
Rev. 83 (3): 1017–66. doi:10.1152/physrev.00004.2003 [34] Bellocchio L, Cervino C, Pasquali R, Pagotto U (June
(inactive 2010-07-25). PMID 12843414. 2008). “The endocannabinoid system and energy
metabolism”. J. Neuroendocrinol. 20 (6): 850–
[23] Chevaleyre V, Heifets BD, Kaeser PS, Südhof TC, Pur- 7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01728.x. PMID
pura DP, Castillo PE (2007). “ENDOCANNABINOID- 18601709.
MEDIATED LONG-TERM PLASTICITY REQUIRES
cAMP/PKA SIGNALING AND RIM1α". Neuron 54 [35] Hill MN, McLaughlin RJ, Bingham B, et al. (May
(5): 801–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.020. PMC 2010). “Endogenous cannabinoid signaling is essential
2001295. PMID 17553427. for stress adaptation”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
107 (20): 9406–11. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.9406H.
[24] Bacci A, Huguenard JR, Prince DA (2004). “Long- doi:10.1073/pnas.0914661107. PMC 2889099. PMID
lasting self-inhibition of neocortical interneurons 20439721.
mediated by endocannabinoids”. Nature 431
(7006): 312–6. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..312B. [36] Häring M, Kaiser N, Monory K, Lutz B (2011).
doi:10.1038/nature02913. PMID 15372034. Burgess, Harold A, ed. “Circuit specific func-
tions of cannabinoid CB1 receptor in the balance
[25] Hampson RE, Deadwyler SA (1999). “Cannabinoids, of investigatory drive and exploration”. PLoS ONE
hippocampal function and memory”. Life Sci. 65 (6–7): 6 (11): e26617. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...626617H.
715–23. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00294-5. PMID doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026617. PMC 3206034.
10462072. PMID 22069458.
[26] Pertwee RG (2001). “Cannabinoid receptors and pain”. [37] Basu S, Ray A, Dittel BN (December 2011).
Prog. Neurobiol. 63 (5): 569–611. doi:10.1016/S0301- “Cannabinoid receptor 2 is critical for the homing
0082(00)00031-9. PMID 11164622. and retention of marginal zone B lineage cells and for
efficient T-independent immune responses”. J. Immunol.
[27] Jiang W, Zhang Y, Xiao L et al. (2005). “Cannabinoids
187 (11): 5720–32. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102195.
promote embryonic and adult hippocampus neuroge-
PMC 3226756. PMID 22048769.
nesis and produce anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like
effects”. J. Clin. Invest. 115 (11): 3104–
[38] Baker D, Pryce G, Croxford JL et al. (2000).
16. doi:10.1172/JCI25509. PMC 1253627. PMID
“Cannabinoids control spasticity and tremor in a mul-
16224541.
tiple sclerosis model”. Nature 404 (6773): 84–7.
doi:10.1038/35003583. PMID 10716447.
[28] Aguado T, Monory K, Palazuelos J et al. (2005). “The
endocannabinoid system drives neural progenitor prolif-
[39] Baker D, Pryce G, Croxford JL et al. (2001). “En-
eration”. FASEB J. 19 (12): 1704–6. doi:10.1096/fj.05-
docannabinoids control spasticity in a multiple sclerosis
3995fje. PMID 16037095.
model”. FASEB J. 15 (2): 300–2. doi:10.1096/fj.00-
[29] Christie BR, Cameron HA (2006). “Neurogenesis in the 0399fje. PMID 11156943.
adult hippocampus”. Hippocampus 16 (3): 199–207.
doi:10.1002/hipo.20151. PMID 16411231. [40] Cabranes A, Pryce G, Baker D, Fernández-Ruiz J (Au-
gust 2006). “Changes in CB1 receptors in motor-related
[30] Kirkham TC, Tucci SA (2006). “Endocannabinoids brain structures of chronic relapsing experimental allergic
in appetite control and the treatment of obesity”. encephalomyelitis mice”. Brain Res. 1107 (1): 199–205.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5 (3): 272–92. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.001. PMID 16822488.
doi:10.2174/187152706777452272. PMID 16787229.
[41] Carrier EJ, Kearn CS, Barkmeier AJ, et al. (April 2004).
[31] Di Marzo V, Sepe N, De Petrocellis L, et al. (De- “Cultured rat microglial cells synthesize the endocannabi-
cember 1998). “Trick or treat from food en- noid 2-arachidonylglycerol, which increases proliferation
docannabinoids?". Nature 396 (6712): 636–7. via a CB2 receptor-dependent mechanism”. Mol. Phar-
Bibcode:1998Natur.396..636D. doi:10.1038/25267. macol. 65 (4): 999–1007. doi:10.1124/mol.65.4.999.
PMID 9872309. PMID 15044630.
[32] De Luca MA, Solinas M, Bimpisidis Z, Goldberg [42] Maccarrone M, Valensise H, Bari M, Lazzarin N, Ro-
SR, Di Chiara G (July 2012). “Cannabinoid facil- manini C, Finazzi-Agrò A (2000). “Relation between
itation of behavioral and biochemical hedonic taste decreased anandamide hydrolase concentrations in hu-
responses”. Neuropharmacology 63 (1): 161–8. man lymphocytes and miscarriage”. Lancet 355 (9212):
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.10.018. PMC 3705914. 1326–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02115-2. PMID
PMID 22063718. 10776746.
[33] Yoshida R, Ohkuri T, Jyotaki M, et al. (Jan- [43] Das SK, Paria BC, Chakraborty I, Dey SK (1995).
uary 2010). “Endocannabinoids selectively enhance “Cannabinoid ligand-receptor signaling in the mouse
sweet taste”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. uterus”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
107 (2): 935–9. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107..935Y. 92 (10): 4332–6. Bibcode:1995PNAS...92.4332D.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0912048107. JSTOR 40535875. PMC doi:10.1073/pnas.92.10.4332. PMC 41938. PMID
2818929. PMID 20080779. 7753807.
81.5. FURTHER READING 119
[44] Paria BC, Das SK, Dey SK (1995). “The preimplan- [55] Niyuhire F, Varvel SA, Martin BR, Lichtman AH (2007).
tation mouse embryo is a target for cannabinoid ligand- “Exposure to marijuana smoke impairs memory retrieval
receptor signaling”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. in mice”. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 322 (3): 1067–75.
92 (21): 9460–4. Bibcode:1995PNAS...92.9460P. doi:10.1124/jpet.107.119594. PMID 17586723.
doi:10.1073/pnas.92.21.9460. PMC 40821. PMID
7568154. [56] Parmentier R, Ohtsu H, Djebbara-Hannas Z, Valatx JL,
Watanabe T, Lin JS (September 2002). “Anatomical,
[45] Keppel Hesselink, J.M. (2002). “New Targets in physiological, and pharmacological characteristics of his-
Pain, Non-Neuronal Cells, and the Role of Palmi- tidine decarboxylase knock-out mice: evidence for the
toylethanolamide”. The Open Pain Journal (Germany) 5: role of brain histamine in behavioral and sleep-wake con-
12–23. doi:10.2174/1876386301205010012. Retrieved trol”. J. Neurosci. 22 (17): 7695–711. PMID 12196593.
2014-01-15.
[57] Marsicano G, Goodenough S, Monory K, et al.
[46] Colloca, Luana (2013-08-28). Placebo and Pain: From (October 2003). “CB1 cannabinoid receptors and
Bench to Bedside (1st ed.). Elsevier Science. pp. 11–12. on-demand defense against excitotoxicity”. Science
ISBN 9780123979315. 302 (5642): 84–8. Bibcode:2003Sci...302...84M.
doi:10.1126/science.1088208. PMID 14526074.
[47] Ross RA (November 2003). “Anandamide and vanilloid
TRPV1 receptors”. Br. J. Pharmacol. 140 (5): 790–
801. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705467. PMC 1574087. PMID
14517174. 81.5 Further reading
[48] Huang SM, Bisogno T, Trevisani M, et al. (June
2002). “An endogenous capsaicin-like substance with • Neumeister A, Normandin MD, Pietrzak RH, et
high potency at recombinant and native vanilloid VR1 al. (2013). “Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 re-
receptors”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. ceptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder:
99 (12): 8400–5. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.8400H. A positron emission tomography study”. Molecu-
doi:10.1073/pnas.122196999. PMC 123079. PMID lar Psychiatry. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.61. Lay sum-
12060783. mary – ScienceDaily (May 14, 2013).
[49] Murillo-Rodríguez E, Sánchez-Alavez M, Navarro L, • Földy C, Malenka RC, Südhof TC (May
Martínez-González D, Drucker-Colín R, Prospéro-García 2013). “Autism-associated neuroligin-3 mu-
O (November 1998). “Anandamide modulates sleep tations commonly disrupt tonic endocannabi-
and memory in rats”. Brain Res. 812 (1–2): 270–4.
noid signaling”. Neuron 78 (3): 498–509.
doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00969-X. PMID 9813364.
doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.036. PMC
[50] Santucci V, Storme JJ, Soubrié P, Le Fur G (1996). 3663050. PMID 23583622. Lay summary –
“Arousal-enhancing properties of the CB1 cannabinoid ScienceDaily (April 11, 2013).
receptor antagonist SR 141716A in rats as assessed by
electroencephalographic spectral and sleep-waking cycle • Puighermanal E, Marsicano G, Busquets-Garcia
analysis”. Life Sci. 58 (6): PL103–10. doi:10.1016/0024- A, Lutz B, Maldonado R, Ozaita A (September
3205(95)02319-4. PMID 8569415. 2009). “Cannabinoid modulation of hippocam-
pal long-term memory is mediated by mTOR sig-
[51] Wang L, Yang T, Qian W, Hou X (January 2011). “The
role of endocannabinoids in visceral hyposensitivity in-
naling”. Nat. Neurosci. 12 (9): 1152–8.
duced by rapid eye movement sleep deprivation in rats: doi:10.1038/nn.2369. PMID 19648913. Lay sum-
regional differences”. Int. J. Mol. Med. 27 (1): 119–26. mary – ScienceDaily (August 4, 2009).
doi:10.3892/ijmm.2010.547. PMID 21057766.
• Niehaus JL, Liu Y, Wallis KT, et al. (December
[52] Murillo-Rodriguez E, Désarnaud F, Prospéro-García 2007). “CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity is mod-
O (May 2006). “Diurnal variation of arachi- ulated by the cannabinoid receptor interacting pro-
donoylethanolamine, palmitoylethanolamide and tein CRIP 1a”. Mol. Pharmacol. 72 (6): 1557–
oleoylethanolamide in the brain of the rat”. Life Sci. 66. doi:10.1124/mol.107.039263. PMC 2644445.
79 (1): 30–7. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.028. PMID PMID 17895407. Lay summary – ScienceDaily
16434061. (November 30, 2007).
[53] Ravinet Trillou C, Delgorge C, Menet C, Arnone M,
Soubrié P (2004). “CB1 cannabinoid receptor knock-
out in mice leads to leanness, resistance to diet-induced 81.6 External links
obesity and enhanced leptin sensitivity”. Int. J.
Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 28 (4): 640–8.
doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802583. PMID 14770190. • Homepage of the ICRS - The International Cannabi-
noid Research Society
[54] Varvel SA, Lichtman AH (2002). “Evaluation of CB1
receptor knockout mice in the Morris water maze”. • Homepage of the ECSN - The Endocannabinoid
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 301 (3): 915–24. System Network
doi:10.1124/jpet.301.3.915. PMID 12023519.
Chapter 82
Endocannabinoid transporters
Most neurotransmitters are water-soluble and require Uptake Is Consistent with Rate-limited Diffusion and Is
transmembrane proteins to transport them across the Regulated by the Degree of Its Hydrolysis by Fatty Acid
cell membrane. The endocannabinoids (anandamide, Amide Hydrolase”. The Journal of Biological Chemistry
AEA, and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, 2-AG) on the other 281 (14): 9066–9075. doi:10.1074/jbc.M509721200.
hand, are non-charged lipids that readily cross lipid PMID 16461355.
membranes.[1][2][3][4][5] However, since the endocannabi- [4] Sandberg, A.; Fowler, C.J. (2005). “Measurement
noids are water immiscible, protein transporters have of saturable and non-saturable components of anan-
been described that act as carriers to solubilize and damide uptake into P19 embryonic carcinoma cells
transport the endocannabinoids through the aqueous in the presence of fatty acid-free bovine serum albu-
cytoplasm. These include the heat shock proteins min.”. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 134 (2): 131–
(Hsp70s) and fatty acid binding proteins for anandamide 139. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.12.010. PMID
(FABPs).[6][7] FABP inhibitors attenuate the breakdown 15784231.
of anandamide by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydro- [5] Di Pasquale, E.; Chahinian, H.; Sanchez, P.; Fantini, J.
lase (FAAH) in cell culture.[6] One of these inhibitors (2009). “The Insertion and Transport of Anandamide
(SB-FI-26), isolated from a virtual library of a million in Synthetic Lipid Membranes Are Both Cholesterol-
compounds, belongs to a class of compounds (named Dependent” [Translated title]. PLoS ONE 4 (3): e4989.
the “truxilloids’) that act as a anti-nociceptive agent doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004989. PMID 19330032.
with mild anti-inflammatory activity in mice.[8] These
[6] Kaczocha, M.; Glaser, S.T.; Deutsch, D.G. (2009).
truxillic acids and their derivatives have been known to
“Identification of intracellular carriers for the endo-
have anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects in cannabinoid anandamide”. Proceedings of the National
mice[9] and are active components of a Chinese herbal Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106
medicine ((-)-Incarvillateine Incarvillea sinensis) used to (15): 6375–6380. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901515106. PMC
treat rheumatism and pain in human. The blockade of 2669397. PMID 19307565.
anandamide transport may, at least in part, be the mech-
anism through which these compounds exert their anti- [7] Oddi, S.; Fezza, F.; Pasquariello, N.; D'Agostino, A.;
nociceptive effects. Catanzaro, G.; De Simone, C.; Rapino, C.; Finazzi-
Agro, A.; Maccarrone, M. (2009). “Molecular identifi-
cation of albumin and Hsp70 as cytosolic anandamide-
binding proteins”. Chemistry & Biology 16 (6): 624–632.
82.1 References doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.004. PMID 19481477.
[1] Kaczocha, Martin; Lin, Qingqing; Nelson, Lindsay D.; [8] Berger, W.T.; Ralph, B.P.; Kaczocha, M.; Sun, J.; Bal-
McKinney, Michelle K.; Cravatt, Benjamin F.; London, ius, T.E.; Rizzo, R.C.; Haj-Dahmane, S.; Ojima, I.;
Erwin; Deutsch, Deutsch (2012). “Anandamide Exter- Deutsch, D.G. (2012). “Targeting Fatty Acid Binding
nally Added to Lipid Vesicles Containing-Trapped Fatty Protein (FABP) Anandamide Transporters – A Novel
Acid Amide Hydrolase (FAAH) Is Readily Hydrolyzed Strategy for Development of Anti-Inflammatory and
in a Sterol-Modulated Fashion”. ACS Chemical Neuro- Anti-Nociceptive Drugs”. PLoS ONE 12 (7): e50968.
science 3 (5): 364–368. doi:10.1021/cn300001w. PMID doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050968.
22860204. [9] Nakamura, M.; Chi, Y.M.; Yan, W.M.; Nakasugi, Y.;
[2] Bojesen, Inge N.; Hansen, Harald S. (2005). “Membrane Yoshizawa, T.; Irino, N.; Hashimoto, F.; Kinjo, J.; Na-
transport of anandamide through resealed human red hara, T.; Sakurada, S. (1999). “Strong antinociceptive ef-
blood cell membranes”. The Journal of Lipid Research. fect of incarvillateine, a novel monoterpene alkaloid from
46 no. (8): 1652–1659. doi:10.1194/jlr.M400498- Incarvillea sinensis”. Journal of Natural Products 62 (9):
JLR200. 1293–1294. doi:10.1021/np990041c. PMID 10514316.
120
Chapter 83
GW-405,833
GW-405,833 (L-768,242) is a drug that acts as a potent [6] Leichsenring A, Andriske M, Bäcker I, Stichel CC,
and selective partial agonist for the cannabinoid recep- Lübbert H. Analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of
tor subtype CB2 , with an EC50 of 0.65nM and selectivity cannabinoid receptor agonists in a rat model of neuro-
of around 1200x for CB2 over CB1 receptors.[1][2] Ani- pathic pain. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharma-
mal studies have shown it to possess antiinflammatory and cology. 2009 Jan 18. PMID 19152053
anti-hyperalgesic effects at low doses, followed by ataxia
and analgesic effects when the dose is increased.[3][4] Se-
lective CB2 agonist drugs such as GW-405,833 are hoped
to be particularly useful in the treatment of allodynia and
neuropathic pain for which current treatment options are
often inadequate.[5][6]
83.1 References
[1] Huffman JW. The search for selective ligands for the
CB2 receptor. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2000
Sep;6(13):1323-37. doi:10.2174/1381612003399347
PMID 10903395
121
Chapter 84
GW-842,166X
84.1 References
[1] Giblin GM, O'Shaughnessy CT, Naylor A, Mitchell WL,
Eatherton AJ, Slingsby BP, Rawlings DA, Goldsmith P,
Brown AJ, Haslam CP, Clayton NM, Wilson AW, Ches-
sell IP, Wittington AR, Green R (May 2007). “Discovery
of 2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-N-[(tetrahydro-
2H-pyran-4-yl)methyl]−4-(trifluoromethyl)- 5-
pyrimidinecarboxamide, a selective CB2 receptor
agonist for the treatment of inflammatory pain”.
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 50 (11): 2597–600.
doi:10.1021/jm061195+. PMID 17477516.
122
Chapter 85
Hemopressin
• RVD-Hpα
123
Chapter 86
HU-210
124
86.6. EXTERNAL LINKS 125
86.5 References [13] “EMCDDA Action on new drugs briefing paper: Under-
standing the ‘Spice’ phenomenon”.
[1] http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugs_concern/ [14] “Spice Cannabinoid - HU-210”.
spice/spice_hu210.htm
[15] https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/
[2] http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/ synthetic-cannabinoids/what-they-are
orangebook/c_cs_alpha.pdf
HU-243
• Nabilone
87.2 References
[1] Stern, E.; Lambert, D. M. (2007). “Medicinal
Chemistry Endeavors around the Phytocannabi-
noids”. Chemistry & Biodiversity 4 (8): 1707–1728.
doi:10.1002/cbdv.200790149. PMID 17712816.
126
Chapter 88
HU-308
HU-308 is a drug that acts as a cannabinoid agonist. It [5] Rajesh, M., et al. (2007). “CB2-receptor stimula-
is highly selective for the CB2 receptor subtype, with tion attenuates TNF-α-induced human endothelial cell
a selectivity of over 5000x for CB2 vs CB1 .[1] The activation, transendothelial migration of monocytes, and
synthesis and characterization took place in the labora- monocyte-endothelial adhesion”. American journal of
tory of Prof. Mechoulam at the Hebrew University of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 293 (4):
H2210–H2218. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00688.2007. PMC
Jerusalem in the late 1990s. It has analgesic effects,[2]
2229632. PMID 17660390.
promotes proliferation of neural stem cells,[3] and pro-
tects both liver and blood vessel tissues against oxidative
stress via inhibition of TNF-α.[4][5]
88.2 References
[1] Hanus, L., et al. (1999). “HU-308: a specific
agonist for CB(2), a peripheral cannabinoid re-
ceptor”. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 96 (25):
14228–14233. Bibcode:1999PNAS...9614228H.
doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14228. PMC 24419. PMID
10588688.
[2] Labuda, C.; Koblish, M.; Little, P. (2005). “Cannabi-
noid CB2 receptor agonist activity in the hindpaw
incision model of postoperative pain”. European
Journal of Pharmacology 527 (1–3): 172–174.
doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.10.020. PMID 16316653.
[3] Palazuelos, J., et al. (2006). “Non-psychoactive CB2
cannabinoid agonists stimulate neural progenitor prolif-
eration”. The FASEB journal : official publication of the
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
20 (13): 2405–2407. doi:10.1096/fj.06-6164fje. PMID
17015409.
[4] Rajesh, M.; Pan, H.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Batkai, S.; Osei-
Hyiaman, D.; Hasko, G.; Liaudet, L.; Gao, B.; Pacher, P.
(2007). “Pivotal Advance: Cannabinoid-2 receptor ago-
nist HU-308 protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion
injury by attenuating oxidative stress, inflammatory re-
sponse, and apoptosis”. Journal of leukocyte biology
82 (6): 1382–1389. doi:10.1189/jlb.0307180. PMC
2225476. PMID 17652447.
127
Chapter 89
HU-331
HU-331 is a quinone anticarcinogenic drug synthesized by this enzyme.[2] Thus, while doxorubicin and other
from cannabidiol, a cannabinoid in the Cannabis sativa anthraquinones act through many mechanisms such as
plant. It showed a great efficacy against oncogenic hu- apoptosis, abrogation of the cell cycle cell, activation of
man cells. HU-331 does not cause arrest in cell cy- caspases, generation of ROS, inhibition of both topoi-
cle, cell apoptosis or caspase activation. HU-331 in- somerases, activation of intracellular secondary messen-
hibits DNA topoisomerase II even at nanomolar concen- gers, etc. Hu-331 is more active and less toxic, since it
trations, but has shown a negligible effect on the action generates reactive oxygen species in the heart and has a
of DNA topoisomerase I. The cannabinoid quinone HU- specific activity that gives great potential to develop as a
331 is a very specific inhibitor of topoisomerase II, com- new anticancer drug, according to Kogan et al.[2]
pared with most known anticancer quinones.[1] One of
Cannabinoids can act as anticancer compounds killing
the main objectives of these studies is the development several oncogenic cells followed by direct interaction with
of a new quinone derived compound that produces anti- cannabinoid receptors. The growth of glioma is inhibited
neoplastic activity while maintaining low toxicity at ther- by a selective activation of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor
apeutic doses. and endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide inhibit
the proliferation of cells involved in lung cancer. The
reason behind the antitumor effect of HU-331 appears
89.1 Mechanism of action unknown as cannabinoid receptor antagonists do not in-
hibit HU-331, despite being mediated by a cannabinoid
receptor. The HU-331 exerts an antiangiogenic effect ac-
Inhibitors of topoisomerases can act at two different lev- companied by apoptosis of endothelial cells. Although in
els. First inhibiting topoisomerase, which stabilize the some studies. HU-331 has not caused the death of cells
topoisomerase-DNA complex and thus introduce DNA by oncogenic apoptosis. The conclusion that would lead
breaks in the wires that lead to apoptosis, then inhibit- cells to apoptosis based on treatment with the drug did not
ing the catalytic activity of topoisomerase, which hinders increase the proportion of cells containing DNA Lues in
the activity of these enzymes without introducing breaks the sub-G1 phase and have not found the expression of
into the DNA chains. HU-331 seems to be a catalytic caspase-3 in cancer cells.[2]
inhibitor of topoisomerase II, probably by enzymatic lig-
ation to the protein. This molecule does not cause damage
to DNA, but protects cells from damage, natural, or in- 89.2 See also
duced by other inhibitors of topoisomerase II that act as
inhibitors of topoisomerase. Even when 60% of the tar-
get cells are killed by treatment with HU-331, other cells’ • HU-210
nucleic content remains unharmed, with less breakage of • HU-320
DNA chains that control important cellular functions.[2]
• HU-336
Doxorubicin, like other anticancer quinones, was used for
chemotherapy in human cancers for many years. The
mechanism of action of these drugs has been the sub-
ject of considerable controversy since chemotherapeutic 89.3 References
drugs exert their cytotoxic effect on target cells by non-
specific mechanisms. The doxorubicin damages DNA by [1] Kogan N.M. et al. (2007). “HU-331, a novel cannabinoid-
intercalation, the generation of reactive oxygen species based anticancer topoisomerase II inhibitor”. Mol. Can-
cer Ther. 6 (1): 173–183. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-
and inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I and II. This
06-0039. PMID 17237277.
leads to breaking the chains of DNA single and dou-
ble strands. The protein associated with these ruptures [2] Kogan N.M. et al. (2007). “A Cannabinoid Anti-
are the topoisomerase II and DNA damage is catalyzed cancer Quinone, HU-331, Is More Potent and Less Car-
128
89.3. REFERENCES 129
11-Hydroxy-THC
90.1 References
[1] Johnson JR, Jennison TA, Peat MA, Foltz RL (1984).
“Stability of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-
hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC in blood and
plasma”. Journal of analytical toxicology 8 (5): 202–4.
doi:10.1093/jat/8.5.202. PMID 6094914.
130
Chapter 91
9-nor-9β-Hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol
• AM-2389
• HU-243
91.2 References
[1] Johnson MR, et al. Potent Analgetics Derived From 9-
Nor-9β-Hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol. NIDA Research
Monograph 34; 1980. pp 68-74.
131
Chapter 92
Ibipinabant
Ibipinabant (SLV319, BMS-646,256) is a drug used modeling in the homology model”. Journal of Medical
in scientific research which acts as a potent and highly Chemistry 50 (24): 5951–66. doi:10.1021/jm061490u.
selective CB1 antagonist.[1] It has potent anorectic ef- PMID 17979261.
fects in animals,[2] and was researched for the treatment
[5] Srivastava, BK; Soni, R; Joharapurkar, A; Sairam,
of obesity, although CB1 antagonists as a class have KV; Patel, JZ; Goswami, A; Shedage, SA; Kar, SS et
now fallen out of favour as potential anorectics follow- al. (2008). “Bioisosteric replacement of dihydropy-
ing the problems seen with rimonabant, and so ibip- razole of 4S-(-)−3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N'-
inabant is now only used for laboratory research, es- (4-chlorophenyl)-sulfonyl-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-
pecially structure-activity relationship studies into novel pyrazole-1-caboxamidine (SLV-319) a potent CB1
CB1 antagonists.[3][4][5] receptor antagonist by imidazole and oxazole”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 18 (3): 963–8.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.12.036. PMID 18207393.
92.1 See also
• Cannabinoid receptor antagonist
92.2 References
[1] Lange, JH; Coolen, HK; Van Stuivenberg, HH; Dijksman,
JA; Herremans, AH; Ronken, E; Keizer, HG; Tipker, K et
al. (2004). “Synthesis, biological properties, and molecu-
lar modeling investigations of novel 3,4-diarylpyrazolines
as potent and selective CB(1) cannabinoid receptor an-
tagonists”. Journal of Medical Chemistry 47 (3): 627–43.
doi:10.1021/jm031019q. PMID 14736243.
[2] Need, AB; Davis, RJ; Alexander-Chacko, JT; Eastwood,
B; Chernet, E; Phebus, LA; Sindelar, DK; Nomikos, GG
(2006). “The relationship of in vivo central CB1 receptor
occupancy to changes in cortical monoamine release and
feeding elicited by CB1 receptor antagonists in rats”. Psy-
chopharmacology 184 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1007/s00213-
005-0234-x. PMID 16328376.
[3] Lange, JH; Van Stuivenberg, HH; Veerman, W; Wals,
HC; Stork, B; Coolen, HK; McCreary, AC; Adolfs, TJ;
Kruse, CG (2005). “Novel 3,4-diarylpyrazolines as po-
tent cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists with lower
lipophilicity”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Let-
ters 15 (21): 4794–8. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.07.054.
PMID 16140010.
[4] Srivastava, BK; Joharapurkar, A; Raval, S; Patel, JZ; Soni,
R; Raval, P; Gite, A; Goswami, A et al. (2007). “Di-
aryl dihydropyrazole-3-carboxamides with significant in
vivo antiobesity activity related to CB1 receptor antag-
onism: synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular
132
Chapter 93
IDFP
IDFP is an organophosphorus compound related to the brain lysophospholipids, ether lipids and endocannabi-
nerve agent sarin. Like sarin, IDFP is an irreversible noids”. Chemico-Biological Interactions 175 (1–3): 355–
inhibitor for a number of different enzymes that normally 364. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2008.04.008. PMC 2582404.
serve to break down neurotransmitters, however the long PMID 18495101.
alkyl chain of IDFP makes it dramatically weaker as an [3] Ruby, M. A.; Nomura, D. K.; Hudak, C. S. S.;
inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), with an IC50 Mangravite, L. M.; Chiu, S.; Casida, J. E.; Krauss,
of only 6300nM, while it is a potent inhibitor of two R. M. (2008). “Overactive endocannabinoid signal-
enzymes monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), the primary ing impairs apolipoprotein E-mediated clearance of
enzyme responsible for degrading the endocannabinoid triglyceride-rich lipoproteins”. Proceedings of the Na-
2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), and fatty acid amide hy- tional Academy of Sciences 105 (38): 14561–14566.
drolase (FAAH), the primary enzyme that degrades the doi:10.1073/pnas.0807232105. PMC 2567196. PMID
other main endocannabinoid anandamide. The IC50 of 18794527.
IDFP is 0.8nM at MAGL, and 3.0nM at FAAH. Inhibi- [4] Ruby, M. A.; Nomura, D. K.; Hudak, C. S. S.; Bar-
tion of these two enzymes causes markedly increased lev- ber, A.; Casida, J. E.; Krauss, R. M. (2011). Bar-
els of both anandamide and 2-AG in the brain, resulting tolomucci, Alessandro, ed. “Acute Overactive En-
in increased cannabinoid signalling and typical cannabi- docannabinoid Signaling Induces Glucose Intolerance,
noid behavioral effects in animal studies, while its lack of Hepatic Steatosis, and Novel Cannabinoid Receptor 1
potency at AChE means that no cholinergic symptoms are Responsive Genes”. PLoS ONE 6 (11): e26415.
produced.[1][2][3][4] Despite its similar chemical structure doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026415. PMC 3208546.
to the banned nerve agents, the long alkyl chain of IDFP PMID 22073164.
causes it to fall outside the definition of “toxic chemicals” [5] CWC Schedule 1 Part A. Toxic Chemicals
under the Chemical Weapons Convention,[5] and since it
also does not exhibit the potent AChE inhibition of re-
lated organophosphorus compounds, IDFP is not subject
to the same stringent legal controls.
• 4-Nonylphenylboronic acid
93.2 References
[1] Nomura, D. K.; Blankman, J. L.; Simon, G. M.; Fujioka,
K.; Issa, R. S.; Ward, A. M.; Cravatt, B. F.; Casida, J.
E. (2008). “Activation of the endocannabinoid system by
organophosphorus nerve agents”. Nature Chemical Biol-
ogy 4 (6): 373–378. doi:10.1038/nchembio.86. PMC
2597283. PMID 18438404.
133
Chapter 94
2-Isopropyl-5-methyl-1-(2,6-dihydroxy-4-
nonylphenyl)cyclohex-1-ene
2-Isopropyl-5-methyl-1-(2,6-dihydroxy-4-
nonylphenyl)cyclohex-1-ene is an analgesic compound
which is a cannabinoid agonist. It is a ring-opened
cannabinoid derivative, an analogue of cannabidiol.
However, unlike cannabidiol, this compound produces
potent cannabis-like effects in animals, suggesting it acts
as a CB1 agonist.[1]
It can be synthesized by Birch reduction from the nonyl-
analog of cannabidiol.[2]
94.1 References
[1] Razdan, K. (1981). “The Total Synthesis of Cannabi-
noids”. In John Apsimon. The Total Synthesis of Natural
Products. Wiley Interscience. p. 245. ISBN 978-0-471-
05460-3. OCLC 19487018.
134
Chapter 95
JTE 7-31
• MDA-19
• N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
• S-444,823
95.2 References
[1] WO patent 1997/029079, Inaba T, Kaya T, Iwamura
H, “Novel compounds and pharmaceutical use thereof”,
granted 1997-14-08
135
Chapter 96
JTE-907
96.2 References
[1] Iwamura, H, et al. (2001). “In vitro and in vivo phar-
macological characterization of JTE-907, a novel selec-
tive ligand for cannabinoid CB2 receptor”. The Journal
of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 296 (2):
420–5. PMID 11160626.
136
Chapter 97
JWH-015
JWH-015 is a chemical from the naphthoylindole fam- [3] Marriott KS, Huffman JW (2008). “Recent advances in
ily that acts as a subtype-selective cannabinoid agonist. the development of selective ligands for the cannabinoid
Its affinity for CB2 receptors is 13.8 nM, while its affin- CB(2) receptor”. Curr Top Med Chem 8 (3): 187–204.
ity for CB1 is 383 nM, meaning that it binds almost 28x doi:10.2174/156802608783498014. PMID 18289088.
more strongly to CB2 than CB1 [1] However it still dis- [4] Ghosh S, Preet A, Groopman JE, Ganju RK (July
plays some CB1 activity, and in some model systems 2006). “Cannabinoid receptor CB2 modulates the
can be very potent and efficacious at activating CB1 CXCL12/CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis of T lympho-
receptors,[2] and therefore it is not as selective as newer cytes”. Mol. Immunol. 43 (14): 2169–79.
drugs such as JWH-133.[3] It has been shown to possess doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2006.01.005. PMID 16503355.
immunomodulatory effects,[4][5] and CB2 agonists may
[5] Montecucco F, Burger F, Mach F, Steffens S (March
be useful in the treatment of pain and inflammation.[6][7]
2008). “CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist JWH-
It was discovered and named after Dr. John W. Huffman.
015 modulates human monocyte migration through de-
fined intracellular signaling pathways”. Am. J. Phys-
iol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294 (3): H1145–55.
97.1 Metabolism doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01328.2007. PMID 18178718.
137
Chapter 98
JWH-051
98.1 References
[1] Huffman, JW, Yu, S, Showalter, V, Abood, ME, Wiley,
JL, Compton, DR, Martin, BR, Bramblett, RD, Reggio,
PH (1996). “Synthesis and pharmacology of a very potent
cannabinoid lacking a phenolic hydroxyl with high affinity
for the CB2 receptor”. Journal of Medical Chemistry 39
(20): 3875–7. doi:10.1021/jm960394y. PMID 8831752.
138
Chapter 99
JWH-057
• JWH-019
• JWH-073
99.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Yu S, Showalter V, Abood ME, Wiley JL,
Compton DR, Martin BR, Bramblett RD, Reggio PH
(1996). “Synthesis and Pharmacology of a Very Po-
tent Cannabinoid Lacking a Phenolic Hydroxyl with High
Affinity for the CB2 Receptor”. J. Med. Chem. 39 (20):
3875–3877. doi:10.1021/JM960394Y.
139
Chapter 100
JWH-120
• JWH-210
• JWH-398
100.2 References
[1] Huffman, J., et al. (2005). “Structure-activity relation-
ships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabi-
noid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic
effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective
CB(2) receptor agonists.”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
istry 13 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050.
PMID 15582455.
140
Chapter 101
JWH-122
• JWH-398
101.2 References
[1] Huffman, J., et al. (2005). “Structure-activity relation-
ships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabi-
noid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic
effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective
CB(2) receptor agonists.”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
istry 13 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050.
PMID 15582455.
141
Chapter 102
JWH-133
JWH-133 is a potent selective CB2 receptor agonist, with 102.3 External links
a Ki of 3.4nM and selectivity of around 200x for CB2
over CB1 receptors. It was discovered by, and named • JNeurosci.org Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease
after, John W. Huffman. Pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection Me-
JWH-133, alongside WIN 55,212-2 and HU-210, is diated by Blockade of Microglial Activation Also
implicated in preventing the inflammation caused by has been shown to block grown of tumors. More
Amyloid beta proteins involved in Alzheimer’s Disease, clinical studies and trials are needed.
in addition to preventing cognitive impairment and loss of
neuronal markers. This antiinflamatory action is induced
through agonist action at cannabinoid receptors, which
prevents microglial activation that elicits the inflamma-
tion. Additionally, cannabinoids completely abolish neu-
rotoxicity related to microglia activation in rat models.
It may be linked with anti-cancer properties, according to
pre-trial data from a 2010 study in Madrid. [1]
102.2 References
[1] http://www.enewspf.com/index.
php/latest-news/health-and-fitness/
18029-marijuana-compound-halts-breast-cancer-tumor-growth-
[2] http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html
142
Chapter 103
JWH-148
• JWH-193
• JWH-210
• JWH-398
103.2 References
[1] Huffman, J., et al. (2005). “Structure-activity relation-
ships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabi-
noid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic
effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective
CB(2) receptor agonists.”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
istry 13 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050.
PMID 15582455.
143
Chapter 104
JWH-149
• JWH-148
• JWH-193
• JWH-210
• JWH-398
104.2 References
[1] Huffman, J., et al. (2005). “Structure-activity relation-
ships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabi-
noid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic
effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective
CB(2) receptor agonists.”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
istry 13 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050.
PMID 15582455.
144
Chapter 105
JWH-161
105.1 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW (2005). “Recent develop-
ments in the medicinal chemistry of cannabimimetic in-
doles, pyrroles and indenes”. Current Medicinal Chemistry
12 (12): 1395–411. doi:10.2174/0929867054020864.
PMID 15974991.
145
Chapter 106
JWH-176
106.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW. Recent Developments in
the Medicinal Chemistry of Cannabimimetic Indoles,
Pyrroles and Indenes. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2005;
12: 1395-1411.
146
Chapter 107
JWH-359
107.1 References
[1] Huffman, J.; Bushell, S.; Joshi, S.; Wiley, J.; Martin,
B. (2006). “Enantioselective synthesis of 1-methoxy-
and 1-deoxy-2'-methyl-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinols:
new selective ligands for the CB2 receptor”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry 14 (1): 247–262.
doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.08.013. PMID 16165365.
147
Chapter 108
JZL184
108.2 References
[1] Long JZ, Li W, Booker L, Burston JJ, Kinsey SG, Schlos-
burg JE, Pavón FJ, Serrano AM, Selley DE, Parsons LH,
Lichtman AH, Cravatt BF (November 2008). “Selective
blockade of 2-arachidonoylglycerol hydrolysis produces
cannabinoid behavioral effects”. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5
(1): 37–44. doi:10.1038/nchembio.129. PMC 2605181.
PMID 19029917.
148
Chapter 109
JZL195
109.2 References
[1] Long, J. Z.; Nomura, D. K.; Vann, R. E.; Walentiny, D.
M.; Booker, L.; Jin, X.; Burston, J. J.; Sim-Selley, L.
J.; Lichtman, A. H.; Wiley, J. L.; Cravatt, B. F. (2009).
“Dual blockade of FAAH and MAGL identifies behav-
ioral processes regulated by endocannabinoid crosstalk in
vivo”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
106 (48): 20270. doi:10.1073/pnas.0909411106.
149
Chapter 110
KM-233
KM-233 is a drug which is an analogue of Δ8- [5] Krishnamurthy M, Gurley S, Moore BM 2nd. Exploring
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the less active but more sta- the substituent effects on a novel series of C1'-dimethyl-
ble isomer of the active component of Cannabis. km-233 aryl Delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol analogs. Bioorganic
differs from Δ8-THC by the pentyl side chain being re- and Medicinal Chemistry. 2008 Jul 1;16(13):6489-500.
placed by a 1,1-dimethylbenzyl group. It has high bind- PMID 18524604
ing affinity in vitro for both the CB1 and CB2 receptors, [6] Ferreira AM, et al. Quantitative structure-activity re-
with a CB2 affinity of 0.91nM and 13x selectivity over lationship (QSAR) for a series of novel cannabinoid
the CB1 receptor.[1] In animal studies it has been found derivatives using descriptors derived from semi-empirical
to be effective for the treatment of glioma, a form of quantum-chemical calculations. Bioorganic and Medic-
brain tumor.[2] A large number of related analogues are inal Chemistry. 2009 Mar 15;17(6):2598-606. PMID
known where the 1,1-dimethylbenzyl group is substituted 19250829
or replaced by other groups, with a fairly well established [7] Brogi S, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-
structure-activity relationship.[3][4][5][6][7] selectivity relationships analysis guided rational design
of a highly selective ligand for the cannabinoid recep-
tor 2. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2011
110.1 See also Feb;46(2):547-55. PMID 21183257
• AM-411
• AMG-36
110.2 References
[1] Krishnamurthy M, Ferreira AM, Moore BM 2nd. Synthe-
sis and testing of novel phenyl substituted side-chain ana-
logues of classical cannabinoids. Bioorganic and Medic-
inal Chemistry Letters. 2003 Oct 20;13(20):3487-90.
PMID 14505654
150
Chapter 111
L-759,633
• L-768,242
111.2 References
[1] Ross, RA, Brockie, HC, Stevenson, LA, Murphy, VL,
Templeton, F, Makriyannis, A, Pertwee, RG (1999).
“Agonist-inverse agonist characterization at CB1 and
CB2 cannabinoid receptors of L759633, L759656 and
AM630”. British Journal of Pharmacology 126 (3): 665–
72. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702351. PMC 1565857. PMID
10188977.
151
Chapter 112
L-759,656
• L-768,242
112.2 References
[1] Ross, R.; Brockie, H.; Stevenson, L.; Murphy, V.;
Templeton, F.; Makriyannis, A.; Pertwee, R. (1999).
“Agonist-inverse agonist characterization at CB1 and
CB2 cannabinoid receptors of L759633, L759656, and
AM630”. British Journal of Pharmacology 126 (3): 665–
672. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702351. PMC 1565857. PMID
10188977.
152
Chapter 113
LASSBio-881
113.1 References
[1] Duarte CD, Tributino JL, Lacerda DI, Martins MV,
Alexandre-Moreira MS, Dutra F, Bechara EJ, De-Paula
FS, Goulart MO, Ferreira J, Calixto JB, Nunes MP,
Bertho AL, Miranda AL, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CA. Syn-
thesis, pharmacological evaluation and electrochemi-
cal studies of novel 6-nitro-3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl-
N-acylhydrazone derivatives: Discovery of LASSBio-
881, a new ligand of cannabinoid receptors. Bioorganic
and Medicinal Chemistry. 2007 Mar 15;15(6):2421-33.
PMID 17275312
[2] Tributino JL, Santos ML, Mesquita CM, Lima CK, Silva
LL, Maia RC, Duarte CD, Barreiro EJ, Fraga CA, Castro
NG, Miranda AL, Guimaraes MZ. LASSBio-881: an N-
acylhydrazone transient receptor potential vanilloid sub-
family type 1 antagonist orally effective against the hyper-
nociception induced by capsaicin or partial sciatic ligation.
British Journal of Pharmacology. 2010 Apr;159(8):1716-
23. PMID 20401963
153
Chapter 114
LBP-1 (drug)
LBP-1 is a drug originally developed by Organon [5] Ratcliffe P, Adam JM, Baker J, Bursi R, Campbell R,
for the treatment of neuropathic pain,[1][2] and sub- Clark JK, Cottney JE, Deehan M, Easson AM, Ecker D,
sequently further developed by Merck after they ac- Edwards D, Epemolu O, Evans L, Fields R, Francis S,
quired Organon’s patents following their merger with Harradine P, Jeremiah F, Kiyoi T, McArthur D, Morrison
Schering-Plough.[3][4][5] It acts as a potent and selec- A, Passier P, Pick J, Schnabel PG, Schulz J, Steinbrede H,
Walker G, Westwood P, Wishart G, de Haes JU. Design,
tive cannabinoid receptor agonist, with high potency at
synthesis and structure-activity relationships of (indo-3-
both the CB1 and CB2 receptors, but low penetration
yl) heterocyclic derivatives as agonists of the CB1 recep-
of the blood–brain barrier. This makes LBP-1 periph- tor. Discovery of a clinical candidate. Bioorganic and
erally selective, and while it was effective in animal mod- Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011 Apr 15;21(8):2541-6.
els of neuropathic pain and allodynia, it did not produce PMID 21411321
cannabinoid-appropriate responding suggestive of central
effects, at any dose tested.[6] [6] Adam JM, Clark JK, Davies K, Everett K, Fields R,
Francis S, Jeremiah F, Kiyoi T, Maidment M, Morrison
A, Ratcliffe P, Prosser A, Schulz J, Wishart G, Baker
J, Boyce S, Campbell R, Cottney JE, Deehan M, Mar-
114.1 See also tin I. Low brain penetrant CB1 receptor agonists for the
treatment of neuropathic pain. Bioorganic and Medici-
nal Chemistry Letters. 2012 Apr 15;22(8):2932-7. PMID
• Org 28312 22421020
• Org 28611
114.2 References
[1] Julia Adam. Indole Derivatives. Patent WO 2008/101995
[3] Morrison AJ, Adam JM, Baker JA, Campbell RA, Clark
JK, Cottney JE, Deehan M, Easson AM, Fields R, Fran-
cis S, Jeremiah F, Keddie N, Kiyoi T, McArthur DR,
Meyer K, Ratcliffe PD, Schulz J, Wishart G, Yoshiizumi
K. Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships
of indole-3-heterocycles as agonists of the CB1 recep-
tor. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011
Jan 1;21(1):506-9. PMID 21075630
154
Chapter 115
Leelamine
• Resin acid
115.2 References
[1] “Leelamine - Dehydroabietylamine - Cayman Chemical”.
Retrieved May 20, 2013.
155
Chapter 116
Levonantradol
Levonantradol (CP 50,556-1) is a synthetic cannabinoid drug must be dissolved in 5% ethanol, 5% emulphur,
analog of dronabinol (Marinol) developed by Pfizer in the and 90% sterile saline. Synthetic cannabinoids like Lev-
1980s. It is around 30x more potent than THC, and ex- onantradol readily cross the blood-brain barrier because
hibits antiemetic and analgesic effects via activation of they are highly lipophilic and have low molecular weights.
CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors.[1] Levonantradol is Levonantradol’s bioavailability is variable due to the first
not currently used in medicine as dronabinol or nabilone pass metabolism.
are felt to be more useful for most conditions, however it
is widely used in research into the potential therapeutic
applications of cannabinoids.[2][3][4]
116.3 Treatment
Levonantradol has been clinically tested in cancer pa-
116.1 Pharmacodynamics tients for its pain relief and antiemetic benefits. Can-
cer patients that endure chemotherapy often develop in-
Levonantradol is a full CB1 receptor agonist. Cannabi- tense nausea, and Levonantradol has been tested to re-
noid receptors belong to the superfamily of G-protein duce these emetic symptoms. It is often used instead
coupled receptors (GPCRs), and endogenous cannabi- of THC because it has a higher efficacy. Levonantradol
noids naturally activate GPCRs. GPCRs modulate also acts on pain pathways in the central nervous sys-
the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and accumulation of tem, which enables the drug to alleviate pain. Studies
the second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate have shown an absence of emetic side effects within the
(cAMP). The CB1 receptor is the most common GPCR half-life of the Levonantradol administered. Other stud-
in the central nervous system. The activation of CB1 Rs ies suggest that cannabinoid agonists can synergize opioid
decrease calcium conductance and increase potassium anti-nociception. Cannabinoid receptors are located in
conductance in the brain. CB signaling naturally mod- nociceptive pathways, and CBs can promote signal trans-
ulates synaptic transmission and mediates psychoactiv- duction in TRP channels. Although Levonantradol re-
ity, and synthetic cannabinoids mimic these same ac- lieves nociceptive and postoperative pain, decreases nau-
tions. Although the efficacy of Levonantradol is depen- sea, and improves spasticity in addition to being more
dent on the level of GCPR activity, Full agonists like Lev- effective than placebos, it has yet to be approved as le-
onantradol have the ability to activate GPCRs and convert gal medicine. Researchers have concluded that Levo-
Gα into a high affinity state for GTP or low affinity state nantradol is no more effective than Codeine, which is why
for GDP. Previous studies suggest that Levonantradol has they do not recommend expansion into clinical practice.
a higher binding affinity and efficacy than other similar
synthetic cannabinoids (e.g. Δ9 -THC).
116.4 Side effects
116.2 Pharmacokinetics The side effects for Levonantradol include ptosis, seda-
tion, and ataxia in non-human primates. In rodents, the
Although Levonantradol has been extensively tested on symptoms include dysphoria, memory impairment, mo-
animals including cats, rodents, and non-human primates. tor incoordination, reduced concentration, and disorien-
It has also been tested among cancer patient populations tation. Levonantradol also decreases startle response.
in clinical trials. Levonantradol is most commonly ad- In humans, side effects include dry mouth, drowsiness,
ministered intramuscularly (I.M.), however it can also be dizziness, altered perception, mild sedation, and lack of
administered orally. The dosage can range from 0.25 mg- concentration. It can cause an increase in heart rate and
3.0 mg every 2–4 hours, and the half-life is 1–2 hours. In decrease in blood pressure. Euphoric symptoms rarely
order to administer Levonantradol intramuscularly, the occurred in subjects.
156
116.7. REFERENCES 157
116.6 Notes
[1] Little PJ, et al. Pharmacology and stereoselectivity
of structurally novel cannabinoids in mice. Journal
of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 1988;
247:1046–1051.
116.7 References
• Childers, SR (Mar 10, 2006). “Activation of G-
proteins in brain by endogenous and exogenous
cannabinoids.”. The AAPS journal 8 (1): E112–7.
doi:10.1208/aapsj080113. PMC 2751429. PMID
16584117.
• Hosking, R.D.; Zajicek, J.P. (2008). “Therapeutic
potential of cannabis in pain medicine”.
British Journal of Anaesthesia 101 (1): 59–68.
doi:10.1093/bja/aen119.
• McCarthy, LE; Borison, HL (Aug–Sep 1981).
“Antiemetic activity of N-methyllevonantradol and
nabilone in cisplatin-treated cats.”. Journal of
clinical pharmacology 21 (8–9 Suppl): 30S–37S.
doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1981.tb02570.x. PMID
6271834.
• Milewich, L; Gant, NF; Schwarz, BE; Chen, GT;
MacDonald, PC (Mar 15, 1979). “5 alpha-
Reductase activity in human placenta.”. American
journal of obstetrics and gynecology 133 (6): 611–
7. PMID 34324.
Chapter 117
List of AM cannabinoids
158
117.1. SEE ALSO 159
1.2nM at CB1 and 0.3nM at CB2 . It is a derivative of • AM-3102 — an analog of oleoylethanolamide, the
HU-210 and represents a hybrid structure between endogenous agonist for proliferator-activated recep-
the classical and nonclassical cannabinoid families. tor α (PPARα). It also acts as a weak cannabinoid
agonist with Kᵢ values of 33µM at CB1 and 26µM at
• AM-1116 — a dimethylated stereoisomer of anan- CB2 .
damide whose Kᵢ = 7.4nM at CB1 .[2]
• AM-4030 — a potent agonist at both CB1 and CB2 ,
• AM-1172 — an endocannabinoid analog specifi- it is dodecally selective for CB1 , with a Kᵢ of 0.7nM
cally designed to be a potent and selective inhibitor at CB1 and 8.6nM at CB2 . It is a derivative of HU-
of AEA uptake that is resistant to FAAH hydrolysis. 210 and represents a hybrid structure between the
classical and nonclassical cannabinoid families.
• AM-1220 — a potent and selective analgesic CB1
agonist (as racemate) with a Kᵢ of 3.88nM at CB1 • AM-4054 — a potent but slow-onset agonist with
and 73.4nM at CB2 , giving it 19x selectivity for CB1 affinity of 2.2nM and a 40x selectivity for CB1
CB1 . (R) enantiomer has around 1000x higher affin- over CB2 .[18][19]
ity for CB1 than (S) enantiomer.[7][8] • AM-4113 — a CB1 selective neutral antagonist.[20]
• AM-1221 — a potent and selective CB2 agonist with • AM-6545 — a peripherally selective silent antago-
a Kᵢ of 0.28nM at CB2 and 52.3nM at CB1 , giving nist of CB1 receptors.
it a selectivity of almost 187x.
• AM-1710 — a CB2 selective cannabilactone with A more complete list can be found here
54x selectivity over CB1 .[11]
• AM-2233 — (R) enantiomer is potent and se- [4] Hongfeng Deng. Design and synthesis of selective
lective CB1 agonist used in 131 I radiolabelled cannabinoid receptor ligands: Aminoalkylindole and
other heterocyclic analogs. PhD Dissertation, University
form to map distribution of CB1 receptors in
of Connecticut, 2000.
brain.[12][13][14][15][16][17]
[5] WO patent 200128557, Makriyannis A, Deng H,
• AM-2389 — classical cannabinoid derivative with “Cannabimimetic indole derivatives”, granted 2001-06-
26x selectivity for CB1 . 07
160 CHAPTER 117. LIST OF AM CANNABINOIDS
[6] Lu D, Guo J, Duclos RI Jr, Bowman AL, Makriyannis [16] Leung K (Dec 12, 2006). “R-2-[131I]Iodophenyl-
A. Bornyl- and isobornyl-Delta8-tetrahydrocannabinols: a (1-(1-methylpiperidin-2-ylmethyl)−1H-indol-3-
novel class of cannabinergic ligands. Journal of Medic- yl)methanone”. Molecular Imaging and Contrast
inal Chemistry. 2008 Oct 23;51(20):6393-9. PMID Agent Database (MICAD) [Internet]. PMID 20641836.
18826296
[17] Pei, Y., et al. (2008). “Ligand-Binding Architecture
[7] D'ambra, T. (1996). “C-Attached aminoalkylindoles: of Human CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor: Evidence for
potent cannabinoid mimetics”. Bioorganic & Medic- Receptor Subtype-Specific Binding Motif and Model-
inal Chemistry Letters 6: 17–14. doi:10.1016/0960- ing GPCR Activation”. Chemistry & Biology 15: 1207.
894X(95)00560-G. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.10.011.
[10] Poso, A.; Huffman, J. W. (2008). “Targeting the cannabi- [20] Seely KA, Prather PL, James LP, Moran JH. Marijuana-
noid CB2 receptor: modelling and structural determinants based drugs: innovative therapeutics or designer drugs of
of CB2 selective ligands”. British Journal of Pharma- abuse? Molecular Interventions. 2011 Feb;11(1):36-51.
cology 153 (2): 335. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707567. PMC PMID 21441120
2219524. PMID 17982473.
The John W. Huffman research group at Clemson Uni- • JWH-057 — a 1-deoxy analog of Δ8-THC that has
versity synthesized over 450 cannabinoids. Some of those very high affinity for the CB2 receptor, but also has
are: high affinity for the CB1 receptor.[2]
• JWH-007 — an analgesic chemical from the • JWH-073 — an analgesic chemical from the naph-
naphthoylindole family, which acts as a cannabinoid thoylindole family, which acts as a cannabinoid ag-
agonist at both the CB1 receptor and CB2 receptors, onist at both the CB1 and CB2 receptors. It is
with some selectivity for CB2 with a Kᵢ of 2.9nM ± somewhat selective for the CB1 subtype with a Kᵢ
2.6 and 9.5nM ± 4.5 at CB1 .[1] of 8.9nM. It is found in some forms of synthetic
cannabis.
• JWH-015 — a chemical from the naphthoylindole
family, which acts as a subtype-selective cannabi- • JWH-081 — an analgesic chemical from the naph-
noid agonist. Its affinity for CB2 receptors is thoylindole family, which acts as an agonist at both
13.8nM, while its affinity for CB1 is 383nM, mean- the cannabinoid receptors with a Kᵢ of 1.2nM ± 0.03
ing that it binds almost 28x more strongly to CB2 at CB1 [3] and 12.4nM ± 2.2 at the CB2 receptors. It
than CB1 .[1] is fairly selective for the CB1 subtype with approxi-
mately 10x the affinity for CB2 . It is found in some
• JWH-018 — an analgesic chemical from the naph- forms of synthetic cannabis.
thoylindole family, which acts as a full agonist at
both the CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors, with • JWH-098 — a potent and fairly selective CB2 ag-
some selectivity for CB2 with a Kᵢ of 2.9nM ± 2.6 onist with a Kᵢ of 1.9nM ± 0.3 at CB2 and 4.5nM
and 9nM ± 5 at CB1 .[1] It is found in some forms of ± 0.1 at CB1 ,[3] giving it about 2.4x selectivity for
synthetic cannabis. CB2 .
• JWH-019 — an agonist at both CB1 and CB2 re- • JWH-116 — a CB1 ligand with a Kᵢ of 52 ± 5 nM[3]
ceptors, it has 1.77x selectivity for CB2 with a Kᵢ of
5.55nM ± 2 and 9.8nM ± 2 at CB1 . • JWH-120 — a potent and 173-fold selective CB2
agonist with a Kᵢ of 6.1nM ± 0.7, it is the N-propyl
• JWH-030 — an analgesic chemical from the homolog of JWH-122.[2]
naphthoylpyrrole family, it is a partial agonist at CB1
receptors, with a Kᵢ of 87nM, making it roughly half • JWH-122 — a potent and fairly selective CB1 ago-
the potency of THC. nist with a Kᵢ of 0.69nM ± 0.5 at CB1 and 1.2nM ±
1.2 at CB2 . It is found in some forms of synthetic
• JWH-047 — a potent and selective agonist for the cannabis.
CB2 receptor with a Kᵢ of 0.9 nM, and a Kᵢ of 59 ±
3 nM at CB1 , it has a 65x selectivity for CB2 .[1] • JWH-133 — a potent and highly selective CB2 re-
ceptor agonist with a Kᵢ of 3.4nM and selectivity of
• JWH-048 — a potent and selective agonist for the around 200x for CB2 over CB1 receptors.[1]
CB2 receptor with a Kᵢ of 0.49 nM ± 0.1, and a Kᵢ
of 10.7 nM ± 1.0 at CB1 , it has a 22x selectivity for • JWH-139 — 3-(1,1-dimethylpropyl)−6,6,9-
CB2 .[1] trimethyl-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-6H-
benzo[c]chromene[4]
• JWH-051 — an analgesic, it has high affinity for
the CB1 receptor, but is a much stronger agonist for • JWH-147 — an analgesic drug from the naph-
CB2 , with a Kᵢ value of 0.03nM at CB2 vs 1.20nM thoylpyrrole family, which acts as a cannabinoid ag-
at CB1 . It was one of the first CB2 -selective ligands onist at both the CB1 and CB2 receptors. It is some-
developed, although its selectivity for CB2 is modest what selective for the CB2 subtype, with a Kᵢ of
compared to newer compounds such as HU-308. 11.0nM at CB1 vs 7.1nM at CB2 .
161
162 CHAPTER 118. LIST OF JWH CANNABINOIDS
• JWH-234 — a cannabinoid agonist that has 2.2x se- 118.1 See also
lectivity for CB2 with a Kᵢ value of 8.4nM ± 1.8 at
CB2 and 3.8nM ± 0.6 at CB1 . • List of AM cannabinoids
• JWH-249 — CB1 : 8.4nM ± 1.8 CB2 : 20nM ± 2 • List of HU cannabinoids
selectivity for CB1 : 2.38x[6]
• List of CP cannabinoids
• JWH-250 — an analgesic chemical from the pheny-
lacetylindole family, which acts as a cannabinoid ag- • List of miscellaneous designer cannabinoids
onist at both the CB1 and CB2 receptors, with a Kᵢ
of 11nM at CB1 and 33nM at CB2 .[6] It is found in
some forms of synthetic cannabis. 118.2 References
• JWH-251 — (1-pentyl-3-(2-
[1] Huffman, JW, Zengin, G, Wu, MJ, Lu, J, Hynd, G,
methylphenylacetyl)indole) CB1 : 29nM ± 3 Bushell, K, Tartal, C, Hurst, DP, Reggio, PH, Selley, DE,
CB2 : 146nM ± 36 selectivity for CB1 : 5x[6] Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL, Martin, BR (2005). “Structure-
activity relationships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles
• JWH-253 —
at the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric
• JWH-258 — a potent and mildly selective CB1 ag- and electronic effects of naphthoyl substituents. New
onist with a Kᵢ of 4.6nM ± 0.6 and 10.5nM ± 1.3 at highly selective CB(2) receptor agonists”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 13 (1): 89–112.
CB2 .[1]
doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050. PMID 15582455.
• JWH-300 — CB1 : 116nM CB2 : 5.3nM[2] [2] Poso, A.; Huffman, J. W. (2008). “Targeting the cannabi-
noid CB2 receptor: modelling and structural determinants
• JWH-302 — (1-pentyl-3-(3-
of CB2 selective ligands”. British Journal of Pharma-
methoxyphenylacetyl)indole) CB1 : 17nM ± 2
cology 153 (2): 335. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707567. PMC
CB2 : 89nM ± 15 selectivity for CB1 : 5.26x[6] 2219524. PMID 17982473.
• JWH-307 — an analgesic drug from the naph- [3] Huffman, JW, Mabon, R, Wu, MJ, Lu, J, Hart, R, Hurst,
thoylpyrrole family, which acts as a cannabinoid ag- DP, Reggio, PH, Wiley, JL, Martin, BR (2003). “3-
onist at both the CB1 and CB2 receptors. It is some- Indolyl-1-naphthylmethanes: New Cannabimimetic In-
what selective for the CB2 subtype, with a Kᵢ of doles Provide Evidence for Aromatic Stacking Inter-
7.7nM at CB1 vs 3.3nM at CB2 . actions with the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 11 (4): 539–549.
• JWH-336 — CB1 : ~1.2nM CB2 : 36nM[2] doi:10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00451-0. PMID 12538019.
• JWH-350 — a 11-nor-1-methoxy-3-(1',1'- [4] Howlett, A. C.; Barth, F; Bonner, TI; Cabral, G; Casellas,
dimethylheptyl)−9α-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol P; Devane, WA; Felder, CC; Herkenham, M; MacKie, K
with 33-fold selectivity for the CB2 receptor and (2002). “International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII.
high CB2 receptor affinity (Kᵢ=12nM ± 1) has the Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors”. Pharmacolog-
desirable combination of excellent CB2 affinity ical Reviews 54 (2): 161–202. doi:10.1124/pr.54.2.161.
PMID 12037135.
combined with little affinity for the CB1 receptor.[2]
[5] Huffman, J., et al. (2005). “Structure-activity relation-
• JWH-359 — a dibenzopyran “classical” cannabi- ships for 1-alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabi-
noid drug with a Kᵢ of 13.0nM and selectivity of noid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors: steric and electronic
around 220x for CB2 , it is a potent and selective CB2 effects of naphthoyl substituents. New highly selective
receptor agonist. CB(2) receptor agonists.”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
istry 13 (1): 89–112. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.050.
• JWH-387 — 1-pentyl-3-(4-bromo-1- PMID 15582455.
naphthoyl)indole, an analgesic chemical from
the naphthoylindole family, which acts as a potent [6] Huffman, JW, Szklennik, PV, Almond, A, Bushell,
cannabinoid agonist at both receptors with a Kᵢ of K, Selley, DE, He, H, Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL,
1.2nM at CB1 and 1.1nM at CB2 . Martin, BR (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles,
a new class of cannabimimetic indoles”. Bioor-
• JWH-398 — an analgesic chemical from the naph- ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (18): 4110–3.
thoylindole family, which acts as a potent cannabi- doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID 16005223.
noid agonist at both receptors with a Kᵢ of 2.3nM at [7] “The Cannabinoid Receptors”. doi:10.1007/978-1-
CB1 and 2.8nM at CB2 .[7] 59745-503-9. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
• JWH-424 — a potent and moderately selective CB2
agonist with a Kᵢ of 5.44nM at CB2 and 20.9nM at
CB1 .
Chapter 119
LY-2183240
LY-2183240 is a drug which acts both as a po- Simmons RM, Li D, Iyengar S, Felder CC. Identification
tent inhibitor of the reuptake of the endocannabinoid of a high-affinity binding site involved in the transport of
anandamide and as an inhibitor of fatty acid amide hy- endocannabinoids. 2005 Dec; 102(49):17852-7. PMID
drolase (FAAH), the primary enzyme responsible for de- 16314570
grading anandamide. This leads to markedly elevated 2.Jump up ^ Dickason-Chesterfield AK, Kidd SR, Moore
anandamide levels in the brain, and LY-2183240 has SA, Schaus JM, Liu B, Nomikos GG, Felder CC. Phar-
been shown to produce both analgesic and anxiolytic ef- macological characterization of endocannabinoid trans-
fects in animal models.[1][2][3][4] port and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors. Cellu-
lar and Molecular Neurobiology. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4-
6):407-23. PMID 16736384 3.Jump up ^ Alexander
119.1 See also JP, Cravatt BF. The putative endocannabinoid transport
blocker LY2183240 is a potent inhibitor of FAAH and
• PF-04457845 several other brain serine hydrolases. Journal of the
American Chemical Society. 2006 Aug 2;128(30):9699-
• URB-597 704. PMID 16866524 4.Jump up ^ Maione S, Mor-
era E, Marabese I, Ligresti A, Luongo L, Ortar G, Di
Marzo V. Antinociceptive effects of tetrazole inhibitors
119.2 References of endocannabinoid inactivation: cannabinoid and non-
cannabinoid receptor-mediated mechanisms. British
[1] Dickason-Chesterfield AK, Kidd SR, Moore SA, Schaus Journal of Pharmacology. 2008 Nov;155(5):775-82.
JM, Liu B, Nomikos GG, Felder CC. Pharmacological PMID 18660824 5.Jump up ^ Powers MS, Barrenha GD,
characterization of endocannabinoid transport and fatty Mlinac NS, Barker EL, Chester JA. Effects of the novel
acid amide hydrolase inhibitors. Cellular and Molecu- endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor, LY2183240, on fear-
lar Neurobiology. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4-6):407-23. PMID
potentiated startle and alcohol-seeking behaviors in mice
16736384
selectively bred for high alcohol preference. Psychophar-
[2] Alexander JP, Cravatt BF. The putative endocannabi- macology (Berlin). 2010 Dec;212(4):571-83. PMID
noid transport blocker LY2183240 is a potent inhibitor 20838777
of FAAH and several other brain serine hydrolases.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006 Aug
2;128(30):9699-704. PMID 16866524
164
Chapter 120
LY-320,135
120.1 References
[1] Felder CC, Joyce KE, Briley EM, Glass M, Mackie
KP, Fahey KJ, Cullinan GJ, Hunden DC, Johnson DW,
Chaney MO, Koppel GA, Brownstein M. LY320135, a
novel cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, unmasks cou-
pling of the CB1 receptor to stimulation of cAMP ac-
cumulation. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental
Therapeutics. 1998 Jan;284(1):291-7. PMID 9435190
165
Chapter 121
MAM-2201
121.1.1 Pharmacokinetics
Main article: Pharmacokinetic data of JWH-018 is
generally applicable to MAM-2201.
166
Chapter 122
MDA-19
• JWH-019
• JWH-133
• N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
122.2 References
[1] Diaz P, et al. Design and synthesis of a novel series of
N-alkyl isatin acylhydrazone derivatives that act as selec-
tive cannabinoid receptor 2 agonists for the treatment of
neuropathic pain. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2008
Aug 28;51(16):4932-47. PMID 18666769
167
Chapter 123
Menabitan
• Dimethylheptylpyran
123.2 References
[1] Green K, Kim K (February 1977). “Acute dose re-
sponse of intraocular pressure to topical and oral cannabi-
noids”. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental
Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biol-
ogy and Medicine (New York, N.Y.) 154 (2): 228–31.
doi:10.3181/00379727-154-39643. PMID 402656.
168
Chapter 124
Methanandamide
124.1 References
[1] Abadji, V, et al. (1994). "(R)-methanandamide: A
chiral novel anandamide possessing higher potency and
metabolic stability”. Journal of Medical Chemistry 37
(12): 1889–93. doi:10.1021/jm00038a020. PMID
8021930.
169
Chapter 125
MK-9470
125.1 References
[1] Burns HD, Van Laere K, Sanabria-Bohórquez S, Hamill
TG, Bormans G, Eng WS, Gibson R, Ryan C, Con-
nolly B, Patel S, Krause S, Vanko A, Van Hecken A,
Dupont P, De Lepeleire I, Rothenberg P, Stoch SA,
Cote J, Hagmann WK, Jewell JP, Lin LS, Liu P, Goulet
MT, Gottesdiener K, Wagner JA, de Hoon J, Mortel-
mans L, Fong TM, Hargreaves RJ (2007). "[18 F]MK-
9470, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for
in vivo human PET brain imaging of the cannabinoid-
1 receptor”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
104 (23): 9800–5. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.9800B.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0703472104. PMC 1877985. PMID
17535893.
170
Chapter 126
N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
7-methoxy-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)-N-((1S,4R)−1,3,3-
trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)−1H-indole-3-
carboxamide (N-[(S)-fenchyl]−1-[2-(morpholin-4-
yl)ethyl]−7-methoxyindole-3-carboxamide, UR-12,
MN-25) is a drug invented by Bristol-Myers Squibb,[1]
that acts as a reasonably selective agonist of peripheral
cannabinoid receptors.[2] It has moderate affinity for
CB2 receptors with a Kᵢ of 11nM, but 22x lower
affinity for the psychoactive CB1 receptors with a Kᵢ of
245nM. The indole 2-methyl derivative has the ratio of
affinities reversed however, with a Kᵢ of 8nM at CB1
and 29nM at CB2 ,[3][4] which contrasts with the usual
trend of 2-methyl derivatives having increased selectivity
for CB2 (cf. JWH-018 vs JWH-007, JWH-081 vs
JWH-098).[5][6]
Chemically, it is closely related to another indole-3-
carboxamide synthetic cannabinoid, Org 28611, but with
a different cycloalkyl substitution on the carboxam-
ide, and the cyclohexylmethyl group replaced by mor-
pholinylethyl, as in JWH-200 or A-796,260. Early
compounds such as these have subsequently led to the
development of a large number of related indole-3-
carboxamide cannabinoid ligands.[7][8][9][10]
• SR-144,528 [2] Rulin Zhao, et al. Improved procedure for the prepara-
tion of 7-methoxy-2-methyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−1H-
• UR-144 indole-3-carboxylic acid, key intermediate in the synthesis
171
172 CHAPTER 126. N-(S)-FENCHYL-1-(2-MORPHOLINOETHYL)−7-METHOXYINDOLE-3-CARBOXAMIDE
of novel 3-amidoindole and indolopyridone cannabinoid 3. Chin CL, et al. (January 2008). “Differential ef-
ligands. ARKIVOC 2010 (vi):89-95. fects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on regional brain
activity using pharmacological MRI”. British Journal of
[3] Hynes, J., et al. (2002). “C-3 Amido-Indole cannabinoid
receptor modulators”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chem-
Pharmacology 153 (2): 367–79. doi :10.1038/ sj.bjp
istry Letters 12 (17): 2399–402. doi:10.1016/S0960- .0707506. PMC 2219521. PMID 17965748
894X(02)00466-3. PMID 12161142.
Nabazenil
127.1 References
[1] Concise dictionary of pharmacological agents: properties
and synonyms. p188. ISBN 0-7514-0499-3
173
Chapter 128
Nabilone
Main article: Medical cannabis vealed that patients taking cisplatin chemotherapy pre-
ferred metoclopramide, while patients taking carboplatin
chemotherapy preferred nabilone to control nausea and
Nabilone is a synthetic cannabinoid with therapeutic [5]
use as an antiemetic and as an adjunct analgesic for vomiting.
neuropathic pain. It mimics the main chemical com- One study compared the efficacy and tolerability of
pound of cannabis (THC), the active ingredient found in nabilone with that of dihydrocodeine in the treatment of
naturally occurring Cannabis sativa L.[1] neuropathic pain.[6] The authors found that nabilone was
In Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and not as effective as dihydrocodeine in controlling pain, and
Mexico, nabilone is marketed as Cesamet. It was ap- caused a higher incidence of minor adverse drug reactions
proved in 1985 by the U.S. Food and Drug Adminis- than did dihydrocodeine. One critic of the study has sug-
tration (FDA) for treatment of chemotherapy-induced gested that nabilone might be best suited for the treatment
nausea and vomiting (CINV) that has not responded to of patients suffering from central and spasticity-related
conventional antiemetics. Though it was approved by pain, for which there is stronger evidence for the bene-
the FDA in 1985, the drug only began marketing in the fits of cannabinoid therapy; however, these patients made
United States in 2006. In Austria Nabilone is marketed up only a small fraction of the study’s population, and
as Canemes and got its approval for CINV in 2013.[2] the study was not designed to identify subgroups which
might have responded more favorably to treatment than
Although it doesn't have any indication officially (except others.[7]
in Mexico), nabilone is widely used as an adjunct ther-
apy for chronic pain management. Numerous trials and A clinical trial performed in Canada reviewed the use
of nabilone to treat nightmares in individuals suffering
case studies have demonstrated modest effectiveness for
[3]
relieving fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis. [4] from post-traumatic stress syndrome.[8] The study found
that nighttime administration of nabilone reduced the
Nabilone is a racemic mixture consisting of the (S,S) and frequency and/or intensity of nightmares in 34 out of
the (R,R) isomers ("trans"). 47 (72%) of patients, with 28 reporting complete ces-
sation of nightmares.[8] This study is limited to the ex-
tent that there was no placebo control, but warrants fu-
ture investigation into the use of cannabinoid therapy
128.1 Medical uses in the treatment of post-traumatic stress syndrome and
other disorders involving recurrent nightmares. As en-
Nabilone has shown modest effectiveness in relieving docannabinoids play a significant role in regulating long-
fibromyalgia.[3] term depression, perhaps downregulating the CB1 sys-
The main settings that have seen published clinical tem can help remove the highly potentiated, hippocam-
trials of nabilone include movement disorders such pal/amydygalia memories of the fear. At the very least,
as Parkinson’s syndrome, chronic pain, dystonia and CB1 agonists make one less likely to remember a dream,
spasticity neurological disorders, multiple sclerosis, and or even make REM sleep happen without significant in-
the nausea of cancer chemotherapy. Nabilone is also ef- volvement of the limbic system.
fective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,
especially ulcerative colitis. Medical marijuana patients
report that nabilone is more similar in effect to CBD than 128.2 Adverse effects
THC, indicating that it has more of a therapeutic effect
on the body than a “high” effect on the mind. Nabilone can increase, rather than decrease, post-
A study comparing nabilone with metoclopramide, operative pain; in the treatment of fibromyalgia, ad-
conducted before the development of modern 5- verse effects limits the useful dose.[3] Adverse effects of
HT3 antagonist anti-emetics such as ondansetron, re- nabilone include, but are not limited to dizziness/vertigo,
174
128.4. REFERENCES 175
128.4 References
[1] “How to use Cesamet”. Artek LLC. 2008.
Nabitan
129.1 References
[1] Razdan RK. The Total Synthesis of Cannabinoids. Wiley-
Interscience 1980
176
Chapter 130
Nabiximols
130.1 Availability
In June 2010, the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency of the United Kingdom licensed
nabiximols as a prescription-only medicine for the treat-
ment of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis. This regula-
tory authorization represents the world’s first full regula-
Canadian packaging of a case of Sativex vials tory approval for the medicine. The spray is being mar-
keted in the UK by Bayer Schering Pharma. Many MS
Nabiximols (USAN,[1] trade name Sativex) is a patented patients cannot receive nabiximols due to local National
cannabinoid oromucosal mouth spray developed by Health Service (NHS) resistance to its funding.[4][5] but,
the UK company GW Pharmaceuticals for multiple in August 2014, the NHS in Wales agreed to fund Sativex
sclerosis (MS) patients, who can use it to alleviate for people with multiple sclerosis.[6]
neuropathic pain, spasticity, overactive bladder, and other Nabiximols was also approved in Spain for MS spasticity
symptoms.[2] Nabiximols is distinct from all other phar- in the second half of 2010 and was launched in that coun-
maceutically produced cannabinoids currently available try in March 2011. It was approved in the Czech Repub-
because it is a mixture of compounds derived from lic in April 2011, in Germany in May 2011, in Denmark
Cannabis plants, rather than a mono-molecular synthetic in June 2011 and in Sweden in January 2012 to MS pa-
product. The drug is a pharmaceutical product standard- tients who have not responded adequately to other medi-
ised in composition, formulation, and dose, although it is cation for spasticity.[7] It has also been recommended for
still effectively a tincture of the cannabis plant. Its princi- approval in Italy and Austria with formal approvals ex-
pal active cannabinoid components are the cannabinoids: pected in these countries during 2011. In Spain and other
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). European markets (excluding the UK), nabiximols will be
The product is formulated as an oromucosal spray which marketed by Almirall.
is administered by spraying into the mouth. Each spray
delivers a near 1:1 ratio of CBD to THC, with a fixed dose In Canada, nabiximols has been approved by Health
of 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD. Nabiximols is also be- Canada for the treatment of MS spasticity. It has also
ing developed in Phase III trials as a potential treatment to received a licence with conditions (NOC/c) for two addi-
alleviate pain due to cancer. It has also been researched tional uses: as adjunctive treatment for the symptomatic
in various models of peripheral and central neuropathic relief of neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis,[8] and also
pain. for pain due to cancer.[9][10]
In May 2003 GW Pharmaceuticals and Bayer en- Nabiximols is available in a number of countries as an
tered into an exclusive marketing agreement for GW’s unlicensed medicine, which enables doctors to prescribe
cannabis-based medicinal extract product, to be mar- the product to individual patients who they consider may
keted under the brand name Sativex. “Bayer has obtained benefit. The product has been exported from the UK to a
exclusive rights to market Sativex in the UK. In addition, total of 28 countries to date.
Bayer has the option for a limited period of time to nego- In February 2007, GW and Otsuka Pharmaceutical an-
177
178 CHAPTER 130. NABIXIMOLS
[2] http://www.gwpharm.com/SPC.aspx
130.2 Effectiveness
[3] “GW signs Sativex cannabis-based drug deal with Novar-
tis”. The Telegraph. 11 April 2011. Retrieved 12 July
Of the two preliminary Phase III studies investigating the 2012.
treatment of MS patients, one showed a reduction of spas-
ticity of 1.2 points on the 0–10 points rating scale (versus [4] Ryan, Siobhan (4 June 2011). “Sussex MS sufferers call
0.6 points under placebo), the other showed a reduction for drug funding”. Argus (Sussex,UK). Retrieved 8 June
of 1.0 versus 0.8 points. Only the first study reached sta- 2011.
tistical significance. The Phase III approval study con- [5] “Sativex rejected by healthcare provider”. Lincolnshire.
sisted of a run-in phase where the response of individuals 20 June 2011. Retrieved 20 June 2011.
to the drug was determined. The responders (42% of pa-
tients) showed a significant effect in the second, placebo [6] “Wales NHS to offer MS cannabis drug Sativex”. 15 Au-
gust 2014. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
controlled, phase of the trial.[11] A 2009 meta-analysis of
six studies found large variations of effectiveness, with a [7] Sativex (nabiximols), Swedish Medical Products Agency
– statistically non-significant – trend towards a reduction
of spasticity.[12] [8] GW Pharmaceuticals. "Multiple Sclerosis". Accessed 24
July 2011.
[16] http://www.gwpharm.com/GW%20Pharmaceuticals%
20cannabinoid-medicine%20Sativex%20moved%
20to%20Schedule%204%20of%20UK%20Drugs%
20Act.aspx
Naboctate
131.1 References
[1] Concise dictionary of pharmacological agents: properties
and synonyms. p188. ISBN 0-7514-0499-3
180
Chapter 132
NESS-0327
132.2 References
[1] Ruiu S, Pinna GA, Marchese G, Mussinu JM, Saba P,
Tambaro S, Casti P, Vargiu R, Pani L. Synthesis and char-
acterization of NESS 0327: a novel putative antagonist of
the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Journal of Pharmacology
and Experimental Therapeutics. 2003 Jul;306(1):363-70.
PMID 12663689
181
Chapter 133
NESS-040C5
• SR-144,528
133.2 References
[1] Paolo Lazzari et al. Pharmaceutical Compounds. US
Patent 8106218
182
Chapter 134
NMP-7
134.1 References
[1] You H, Gadotti VM, Petrov RR, Zamponi GW, Diaz P.
Functional characterization and analgesic effects of mixed
cannabinoid receptor/T-type channel ligands. Molecular
Pain. 2011 Nov 17;7:89. PMID 22093952
183
Chapter 135
Nonabine
135.1 References
[1] Staquet M, Bron D, Rozencweig M, Kenis Y. Clinical
studies with a THC analog (BRL-4664) in the prevention
of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Journal of Clinical Phar-
macology. 1981 Aug-Sep;21(8-9 Suppl):60S-63S. PMID
7197692
184
Chapter 136
11-nor-9-Carboxy-THC
Not to be confused with Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid. While 11-COOH-THC does not have any psychoac-
tive effects in its own right, it may still have a
11-nor−9-Carboxy-THC, also known as 11-nor−9- role in the analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of
cannabis,[10][11][12] and has also been shown to moderate
carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 11-nor-
9-carboxy-delta-9-THC, 11-COOH-THC, THC- the effects of THC itself which may help explain the dif-
ference in subjective effects seen between occasional and
COOH, and THC-11-oic acid, is the main secondary
metabolite of THC which is formed in the body after regular users of cannabis.[13][14]
Cannabis is consumed.
11-COOH-THC is formed in the body by oxidation of the
active metabolite 11-Hydroxy-THC (also known as 11-
136.1 References
OH-THC) by liver enzymes. It is then metabolized fur-
ther by conjugation with glucuronide,[2] forming a water- [1] http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/55/12/2180
soluble congener which can be more easily excreted by [2] Skopp, G; Pötsch, L (2002). “Stability of 11-nor-delta(9)-
the body.[3] carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol glucuronide in plasma and
11-COOH-THC is not psychoactive itself, but has a long urine assessed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass
spectrometry”. Clinical chemistry 48 (2): 301–6. PMID
half-life in the body of up to several days (or even weeks
11805011.
in very heavy users),[4][5][6] making it the main metabo-
lite tested for when blood or urine testing for cannabis [3] Law, B; Mason, PA; Moffat, AC; King, LJ (1984). “Con-
use. More selective tests are able to distinguish between firmation of cannabis use by the analysis of delta 9-
11-OH-THC and 11-COOH-THC, which can help deter- tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites in blood and urine by
mine how recently cannabis was consumed;[7][8] if only combined HPLC and RIA”. Journal of analytical tox-
11-COOH-THC is present then the cannabis was used icology 8 (1): 19–22. doi:10.1093/jat/8.1.19. PMID
some time ago and any impairment in cognitive ability 6323852.
or motor function will have dissipated, whereas if both [4] Huestis, MA; Mitchell, JM; Cone, EJ (1995). “Detection
11-OH-THC and 11-COOH-THC are present then the times of marijuana metabolites in urine by immunoas-
cannabis was consumed more recently and motor impair- say and GC-MS”. Journal of analytical toxicology 19 (6):
ment may still be present. 443–9. doi:10.1093/jat/19.6.443. PMID 8926739.
Some jurisdictions where cannabis use is decriminalized [5] Pope Jr, HG; Gruber, AJ; Hudson, JI; Huestis,
or permitted under some circumstances use such tests MA; Yurgelun-Todd, D (2001). “Neuropsycho-
when determining whether drivers were legally intoxi- logical performance in long-term cannabis users”.
cated and therefore unfit to drive, with the compara- Archives of General Psychiatry 58 (10): 909–15.
tive levels of THC, 11-OH-THC and 11-COOH-THC doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.10.909. PMID 11576028.
being used to derive a “blood cannabis level” analo-
gous to the blood alcohol level used in prosecuting im- [6] Dietz, L; Glaz-Sandberg, A; Nguyen, H; Skopp,
G; Mikus, G; Aderjan, R (2007). “The urinary
paired drivers.[9] On the other hand in jurisdictions where
disposition of intravenously administered 11-nor-9-
cannabis is completely illegal, any detectable levels of 11-
carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans”.
COOH-THC may be deemed to constitute driving while Therapeutic drug monitoring 29 (3): 368–72.
intoxicated, even though this approach has been criticized doi:10.1097/FTD.0b013e31805ba6fd. PMID 17529896.
as tantamount to prohibition of “driving whilst being a
recent user of cannabis” regardless of the presence or ab- [7] Huestis, MA; Henningfield, JE; Cone, EJ (1992).
sence of any actual impairment that might impact on driv- “Blood cannabinoids. II. Models for the prediction
ing performance. of time of marijuana exposure from plasma concentra-
tions of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-
9-carboxy-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH)".
185
186 CHAPTER 136. 11-NOR-9-CARBOXY-THC
O-1057
• O-1812
• O-2694
137.2 References
[1] Pertwee RG, et al. O-1057, a potent water-soluble
cannabinoid receptor agonist with antinociceptive prop-
erties. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2000
Apr;129(8):1577-84. PMID 10780961
187
Chapter 138
O-1125
O-1125 (3-(1,1-dimethylhexyl-6-
dimethylcarboxamide)-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol) is
a drug which is a cannabinoid derivative. It has analgesic
effects and is used in scientific research. It is a potent
CB1 full agonist with a Ki of 1.16nM.[1]
138.1 References
[1] Griffin G, Wray EJ, Martin BR, Abood ME. Cannabinoid
agonists and antagonists discriminated by receptor bind-
ing in rat cerebellum. British Journal of Pharmacology.
1999 Oct;128(3):684-8. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702806
PMID 10516649
188
Chapter 139
O-1238
139.1 References
[1] Griffin G, Wray EJ, Martin BR, Abood ME. Cannabinoid
agonists and antagonists discriminated by receptor bind-
ing in rat cerebellum. British Journal of Pharmacology.
1999 Oct;128(3):684-8. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702806
PMID 10516649
[2] Griffin G, Wray EJ, Rorrer WK, Crocker PJ, Ryan WJ,
Saha B, Razdan RK, Martin BR, Abood ME. An investi-
gation into the structural determinants of cannabinoid re-
ceptor ligand efficacy. British Journal of Pharmacology.
1999 Apr;126(7):1575-84. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702469
PMID 10323589
189
Chapter 140
O-1269
O-1269 is a drug that is a diarylpyrazole derivative, [5] Wiley, J. L.; Selley, D. E.; Wang, P.; Kottani, R.;
related to potent cannabinoid antagonist drugs such as Gadthula, S.; Mahadeven, A. (2011). “3-Substituted
rimonabant and surinabant. However O-1269 and sev- Pyrazole Analogs of the Cannabinoid Type 1 (CB1) Re-
eral related drugs were unexpectedly found to act as full ceptor Antagonist Rimonabant: Cannabinoid Agonist-
or partial agonists at the cannabinoid receptors rather than Like Effects in Mice via Non-CB1, Non-CB2 Mecha-
nism”. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Thera-
antagonists, and so produce the usual effects expected
peutics 340 (2): 433–444. doi:10.1124/jpet.111.187815.
of cannabinoid agonists in animal tests, such as sedation PMC 3263966. PMID 22085649.
and analgesic effects. The N-heptyl homologue O-1270
and the N-propyl homologue O-1399 also act as cannabi-
noid agonists with similar potency in vivo, despite weaker
binding affinity at cannabinoid receptors compared to the
pentyl homologue O-1269.[1][2][3] Agonist-like and atyp-
ical cannabinoid activity has also been observed with a
number of related compounds.[4][5]
140.1 References
[1] Billy R. Martin, Raj K. Razdan, Anu Mahadevan. Pyra-
zole cannabinoid agonist and antagonists. US Patent
6509367, filed Sep 22, 2001, issued Jan 21, 2003.
[2] Shim JY, Welsh WJ, Cartier E, Edwards JL, Howlett AC.
Molecular interaction of the antagonist N-(piperidin-
1-yl)−5-(4-chlorophenyl)−1- (2,4-dichlorophenyl)−4-
methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide with the CB1
cannabinoid receptor. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
2002 Mar 28;45(7):1447-59. PMID 11906286
190
Chapter 141
O-1602
O-1602 is a synthetic compound most closely related to 17 (8): 1651–1664. doi:10.1002/ibd.21538. PMC
abnormal cannabidiol, and more distantly related in struc- 3116968. PMID 21744421.
ture to cannabinoid drugs such as THC. O-1602 does
[4] Díaz-Arteaga, A.; Vázquez, M. J.; Vazquez-Martínez,
not bind to the classical cannabinoid receptors CB1 or
R.; Pulido, M. R.; Suarez, J.; Velásquez, D. A.; López,
CB2 with any significant affinity, but instead is an ag- M.; Ross, R. A.; De Fonseca, F. R.; Bermudez-Silva,
onist at several other receptors which appear to be re- F. J.; Malagón, M. M.; Diéguez, C.; Nogueiras, R.
lated to the cannabinoid receptors, particularly GPR18 (2012). “The atypical cannabinoid O-1602 stimulates
and GPR55. These previously orphan receptors have food intake and adiposity in rats”. Diabetes, Obesity
been found to be targets for a number of endogenous and and Metabolism 14 (3): 234–243. doi:10.1111/j.1463-
synthetic cannabinoid compounds, and are thought to be 1326.2011.01515.x. PMID 21981246.
responsible for most of the non-CB1 , non-CB2 mediated
[5] Kargl, J.; Haybaeck, J.; Stančić, A.; Andersen, L.;
effects that have become evident in the course of cannabi- Marsche, G.; Heinemann, A.; Schicho, R. (2012). “O-
noid research. O-1602 produces some effects shared with 1602, an atypical cannabinoid, inhibits tumor growth in
classical cannabinoid compounds such as analgesic and colitis-associated colon cancer through multiple mecha-
antiinflammatory effects and appetite stimulation, but it nisms”. Journal of Molecular Medicine 91 (4): 449–58.
does not produce sedation or psychoactive effects, and doi:10.1007/s00109-012-0957-1. PMC 3529923. PMID
has several actions in the gut and brain that are not shared 22965195.
with typical cannabinoid agonists.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
[6] McHugh, D.; Wager-Miller, J.; Page, J.; Bradshaw, H. B.
(2012). “SiRNA knockdown of GPR18 receptors in BV-
2 microglia attenuates N-arachidonoyl glycine-induced
141.1 See also cell migration”. Journal of Molecular Signaling 7 (1): 10.
doi:10.1186/1750-2187-7-10. PMC 3493281. PMID
• Cannabidiol 22834922.
191
Chapter 142
O-1812
O-1812 is an eicosanoid derivative related to anandamide [4] Wiley JL, Smith FL, Razdan RK, Dewey WL (March
that acts as a potent and highly selective agonist for the 2005). “Task specificity of cross-tolerance between
cannabinoid receptor CB1 , with a Kᵢ of 3.4nM at CB1 Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and anandamide analogs in
and 3870nM at CB2 .[1] Unlike most related compounds, mice”. European Journal of Pharmacology 510 (1-
O-1812 is metabolically stable against rapid breakdown 2): 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.01.006. PMID
15740725.
by enzymes, and produces a cannabinoid-like discrim-
inative effect in rats, which is similar but not identical [5] Breivogel CS, et al. (July 2008). “Sensitivity to delta9-
to that produced by cannabinoid drugs of other chemical tetrahydrocannabinol is selectively enhanced in beta-
classes.[2][3][4][5] arrestin2 -/- mice”. Behavioural Pharmacology 19 (4):
298–307. doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e328308f1e6. PMC
2751575. PMID 18622177.
142.1 See also
• AM-1235
• AM-2232
• AM-2389
• Methanandamide
• O-774
• O-1057
142.2 References
[1] Di Marzo V, et al. (February 2001). “Highly se-
lective CB(1) cannabinoid receptor ligands and novel
CB(1)/VR(1) vanilloid receptor “hybrid” ligands”. Bio-
chemical and Biophysical Research Communications 281
(2): 444–51. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4354. PMID
11181068.
192
Chapter 143
O-1871
• Cannabicyclohexanol
143.2 References
[1] Billy R Martin, Raj K Razdan. CANNABINOIDS. Patent
WO 2003/091189
193
Chapter 144
O-1918
O-1918 is a synthetic compound related to cannabidiol, [5] Caldwell, M. D.; Hu, S. S. J.; Viswanathan, S.; Brad-
which is an antagonist at two former orphan receptors shaw, H.; Kelly, M. E.; Straiker, A. (2013). “A
GPR18 and GPR55, that appear to be related to the GPR18-based signaling system regulates IOP in murine
cannabinoid receptors. O-1918 is used in the study of eye”. British Journal of Pharmacology 169 (4): 834–
these receptors, which have been found to be targets for 43. doi:10.1111/bph.12136. PMC 3687663. PMID
23461720.
a number of endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid com-
pounds, and are thought to be responsible for most of the
non-CB1 , non-CB2 mediated effects that have become
evident in the course of cannabinoid research.[1][2][3][4][5]
• O-1602
144.2 References
[1] Offertáler, L.; Mo, F. M.; Bátkai, S.; Liu, J.; Begg,
M.; Razdan, R. K.; Martin, B. R.; Bukoski, R. D.;
Kunos, G. (2003). “Selective ligands and cellular ef-
fectors of a G protein-coupled endothelial cannabinoid
receptor”. Molecular Pharmacology 63 (3): 699–705.
doi:10.1124/mol.63.3.699. PMID 12606780.
194
Chapter 145
O-2050
O-2050 is a drug that is a classical cannabinoid derivative, RE, Razdan RK, Martin BR. Structural and pharmaco-
which acts as a silent antagonist for the CB1 receptor. logical analysis of O-2050, a putative neutral cannabinoid
This gives it an advantage in research over many com- CB(1) receptor antagonist. European Journal of Pharma-
monly used cannabinoid antagonists such as rimonabant, cology. 2011 Jan 25;651(1-3):96-105. PMID 21114999
which at higher doses act as inverse agonists at CB1 as
well as showing off-target effects. However while O-
2050 acts as a silent antagonist in vitro, some tests in vivo
have suggested it may show agonist activity under certain
circumstances.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
145.2 References
[1] Martin B, et al. Agonists and silent antagonists in a series
of cannabinoid sulfonamides. 12th Annual Symposium
on the Cannabinoids, 2002
195
Chapter 146
O-2113
• O-2372
• O-2545
146.2 References
[1] Martin, et al. SULFONAMIDE CANNABINOID AGO-
NISTS AND ANTAGONISTS. US Patent 7279500, Oct
9 2007
196
Chapter 147
O-2372
• O-2545
• O-2694
147.2 References
[1] Martin BR, et al. Pharmacological characteriza-
tion of novel water-soluble cannabinoids. Journal of
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2006
Sep;318(3):1230-9. PMID 16757541
197
Chapter 148
O-2545
• Tropoxane
148.2 References
[1] Martin BR, et al. Pharmacological characteriza-
tion of novel water-soluble cannabinoids. Journal of
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2006
Sep;318(3):1230-9. PMID 16757541
198
Chapter 149
O-2694
• O-2372
149.2 References
[1] Martin BR, et al. Pharmacological characteriza-
tion of novel water-soluble cannabinoids. Journal of
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2006
Sep;318(3):1230-9. PMID 16757541
199
Chapter 150
O-774
• O-1057
• O-1812
150.2 References
[1] Singer M, et al. Potent cyano and carboxam-
ido side-chain analogues of 1', 1'-dimethyl-delta8-
tetrahydrocannabinol. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
1998 Oct 22;41(22):4400-7. PMID 9784115
200
Chapter 151
O-806
151.1 References
[1] Griffin, G.; Wray, E.; Rorrer, W.; Crocker, P.; Ryan, W.;
Saha, B.; Razdan, R.; Martin, B.; Abood, M. (1999). “An
investigation into the structural determinants of cannabi-
noid receptor ligand efficacy”. British Journal of Pharma-
cology 126 (7): 1575–1584. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702469.
PMC 1565939. PMID 10323589.
201
Chapter 152
O-823
152.1 References
[1] Pertwee RG, Fernando SR, Griffin G, Ryan W,
Razdan RK, Compton DR, Martin BR. Agonist-
antagonist characterization of 6'-cyanohex-2'-yne-delta
8-tetrahydrocannabinol in two isolated tissue prepara-
tions. European Journal of Pharmacology. 1996 Nov
14;315(2):195-201. PMID 8960884
[2] Griffin G, Wray EJ, Rorrer WK, Crocker PJ, Ryan WJ,
Saha B, Razdan RK, Martin BR, Abood ME. An investi-
gation into the structural determinants of cannabinoid re-
ceptor ligand efficacy. British Journal of Pharmacology.
1999 Apr;126(7):1575-84. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702469
PMID 10323589
202
Chapter 153
Org 27569
153.1 References
[1] Price MR, Baillie GL, Thomas A, Stevenson LA, Eas-
son M, Goodwin R, McLean A, McIntosh L, Goodwin
G, Walker G, Westwood P, Marrs J, Thomson F, Cowley
P, Christopoulos A, Pertwee RG, Ross RA (November
2005). “Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1
receptor”. Molecular Pharmacology 68 (5): 1484–95.
doi:10.1124/mol.105.016162. PMID 16113085.
203
Chapter 154
Org 28312
154.2 References
[1] Adam, J. M., et al. (2010). “Design, synthesis, and
structure–activity relationships of indole-3-carboxamides
as novel water soluble cannabinoid CB1 receptor ago-
nists”. MedChemComm 1: 54. doi:10.1039/c0md00022a.
204
Chapter 155
Org 28611
155.2 References
[1] Adam, J. M., et al. (2010). “Design, synthesis, and
structure–activity relationships of indole-3-carboxamides
as novel water soluble cannabinoid CB1 receptor ago-
nists”. MedChemComm 1: 54. doi:10.1039/c0md00022a.
205
Chapter 156
Otenabant
156.2 References
[1] Kim, M., et al. (2008), Design, chemical synthe-
sis, and biological evaluation of novel triazolyl ana-
logues of taranabant (MK-0364), a cannabinoid-1 recep-
tor inverse agonist, Tetrahedron 64 (48): 10802–10809,
doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.057
[3] http://www.pfizer.com
206
Chapter 157
Parahexyl
207
Chapter 158
UR-144
UR-144 (TMCP-018, KM-X1, MN-001, YX-17) is a drug screens has been developed by Tulip Biolabs, Inc.
drug invented by Abbott Laboratories,[1] that acts as a se- An Homogeneous Immunoassay that runs on most Clin-
lective full agonist of the peripheral cannabinoid receptor ical Chemistry Analyzers and detects several UR and
CB2 , but with much lower affinity for the psychoactive XLR synthetic cannabinoids has been developed and in-
CB1 receptor. troduced by Immunalysis Inc. Pomona USA.
UR-144 has high affinity for the CB2 receptor with a Kᵢ • AB-001
of 1.8 nM but 83x lower affinity for the CB1 receptor with • AM-1221
a Kᵢ of 150 nM.[2] Although a later study found its CB1
affinity to be much higher than previously expected, with • 4-HTMPIPO
a Kᵢ of 28.9nM and an EC50 of 1295nM. Chemically it • JTE 7-31
is closely related to other 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl
synthetic cannabinoids like A-796,260 and A-834,735 • JWH-018
but with a different substitution on the 1-position of the • N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7-
indole core, in these compounds its 1-pentyl group is re- methoxyindole-3-carboxamide
placed with alkylheterocycles like 1-(2-morpholinoethyl)
and 1-(tetrahydropyran-4-ylmethyl). • XLR-11
208
158.6. FURTHER READING 209
Perrottetinene
159.1 References
[1] Cullmann F, Becker H. Prenylated bibenzyls from the liv-
erwort Radula laxiramea. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung.
1999; 54(3-4): 147-150. ISSN 09395075
210
Chapter 160
PF-03550096
160.2 References
[1] Ando K et al, BENZIMIDAZOLONE DERIVATIVES.
WO 2008/032164
211
Chapter 161
PF-514273
161.1 References
[1] Dow RL, Carpino PA, Hadcock JR, Black SC, Iredale
PA, DaSilva-Jardine P, Schneider SR, Paight ES, Griffith
DA, Scott DO, O'Connor RE, Nduaka CI. Discov-
ery of 2-(2-chlorophenyl)−3-(4-chlorophenyl)−7-
(2,2-difluoropropyl)−6,7-dihydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-
f][1,4]oxazepin-8(5H)-one (PF-514273), a novel,
bicyclic lactam-based cannabinoid-1 receptor antago-
nist for the treatment of obesity. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 2009 May 14;52(9):2652-5. PMID 19351113
212
Chapter 162
PipISB
162.1 References
[1] Donohue, Sean R.; Halldin, Christer; Schou, Mag-
nus; Hong, Jinsoo; Phebus, Lee; Chernet, Eyassu;
Hitchcock, Stephen A.; Gardinier, Kevin M.; Ru-
ley, Kevin M.; Krushinski, Joseph H.; Schaus, John;
Pike, Victor W. (2008). “Radiolabeling of a high
potency cannabinoid subtype-1 receptor inverse ago-
nist, N-(4-fluoro-benzyl)−4-(3-(piperidin-1-yl-indole-1-
sulfonyl)benzamide (PipISB), with carbon-11 or fluorine-
18”. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharma-
ceuticals 51 (3): 146. doi:10.1002/jlcr.1491.
213
Chapter 163
Pirnabine
163.1 References
[1]
214
Chapter 164
PSB-SB-1202
164.2 References
[1] Rempel V, Volz N, Hinz S, Karcz T, Meliciani I,
Nieger M, Wenzel W, Bräse S, Müller CE. 7-Alkyl-3-
benzylcoumarins: a versatile scaffold for the development
of potent and selective cannabinoid receptor agonists and
antagonists. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2012 Sep
27;55(18):7967-77. PMID 22916707
[2] Rempel, V.; Volz, N.; Gläser, F.; Nieger, M.; Bräse,
S.; Müller, C. E. (2013). “Antagonists for the orphan
G protein-coupled receptor GPR55 based on a coumarin
scaffold”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 56 (11):
130516144836005. doi:10.1021/jm4005175. PMID
23679955.
215
Chapter 165
PSB-SB-487
165.2 References
[1] Rempel, V.; Volz, N.; Gläser, F.; Nieger, M.; Bräse,
S.; Müller, C. E. (2013). “Antagonists for the orphan
G protein-coupled receptor GPR55 based on a coumarin
scaffold”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 56 (11):
130516144836005. doi:10.1021/jm4005175. PMID
23679955.
216
Chapter 166
QUCHIC
166.2 References
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Matsuda, S.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-
Hanajiri, R.; Goda, Y. (2013). “Two new-type
cannabimimetic quinolinyl carboxylates, QUPIC and
QUCHIC, two new cannabimimetic carboxamide deriva-
tives, ADB-FUBINACA and ADBICA, and five synthetic
cannabinoids detected with a thiophene derivative α-PVT
and an opioid receptor agonist AH-7921 identified in ille-
gal products”. Forensic Toxicology. doi:10.1007/s11419-
013-0182-9.
[2] Dunne bans further two substances found in K2. Press
Release: New Zealand Government. Tuesday, 30 April
2013
217
Chapter 167
QUPIC
167.2 Legal status [5] “PB-22 and 5F-PB-22”. Drug Enforcement Administra-
tion, Office of Diversion Control.
As of 9 May 2014, PB-22 is no longer legal in New [6] Jeremy Pelzer (April 17, 2014). “Ohio bans two synthetic
Zealand. marijuana drugs sold as “herbal incense"". cleveland.com.
In January 2014, QUPIC was designated as a Schedule I [7] “Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sun-
controlled substance in the United States.[4][5] shine”. Leg.state.fl.us. 1997-05-06. Retrieved 2014-07-
In Ohio, QUPIC is illegal.[6] 12.
• QUCHIC
218
Chapter 168
Rimonabant
Rimonabant (also known as SR141716; trade name the anti-obesity treatment for approval.[2] Subsequently,
Acomplia) is an anorectic antiobesity drug that has been Sanofi-Aventis announced it was suspending the new drug
withdrawn from the market due to potentially serious side application (NDA) for rimonabant, and that it would re-
effects. It was approved for use in Europe and other coun- submit an application at some point in the future.
tries, but never approved in the United States. Rimona- The EU’s approval was not a blanket approval, nor did it
bant is an inverse agonist for the cannabinoid receptor approve Acomplia for nonobesity-related problems, such
CB1.[3] Its main effect is reduction in appetite. as smoking cessation, although off-label use of the drug
was still possible. The approval was, in combination
with diet and exercise, for the treatment of obese patients
(BMI greater than or equal to 30), or overweight patients
168.1 History (BMI greater than 27) with associated risk factors, such
as type 2 diabetes or dyslipidaemia.
See also: Discovery and development of Cannabinoid
In October 2008, the European Medicines Agency's
Receptor 1 Antagonists
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
(CHMP) had determined that the risks of Acomplia out-
Rimonabant was the first selective CB1 receptor blocker weighed its benefits. The Agency subsequently recom-
to be approved for use anywhere in the world. In Europe, mended that the product be suspended from the UK mar-
it was indicated for use in conjunction with diet and ex- ket, and that doctors not prescribe the drug due to the risk
ercise for patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater of serious psychiatric problems, and even suicide. Sanofi-
than 30 kg/m², or patients with a BMI greater than 27 Aventis then suspended sale of the drug.[1][6][7] Approval
kg/m² with associated risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes of the drug was officially withdrawn by the European
or dyslipidaemia. In the UK, it was available beginning Medicines Agency on 16 January 2009.[8]
in July 2006. As of 2008, the drug was available in 56
India has prohibited the manufacture and sale of the
countries.
drug.[9]
On 21 June 2006, the European Commission approved
the sale of rimonabant in the then-25-member European
Union. Pharmaceutical company Sanofi-Aventis, (which
changed its name to Sanofi in 2011) announced the first
country in which Acomplia would be sold was the United
Kingdom as a prescription drug. Sales began in July
2006. Sanofi-Aventis also projected that the drug would 168.2 Uses/potential uses
be sold shortly thereafter in Denmark, Ireland, Germany,
Finland, and Norway. It was expected in Belgium[4] and
Sweden in 2007. Ordinary obesity would, according to 168.2.1 Obesity
official medical recommendations, not be enough to ac-
quire the prescription in Sweden; there would be ad- In a 2006 (2 year) study reported in JAMA, “Compared
ditional requirements concerning abnormal blood lipid with the placebo group, the 20 mg of rimonabant group
levels.[5] produced greater mean (SEM) reductions in weight (−6.3
Rimonabant was submitted to the Food and Drug Admin- [0.2] kg vs −1.6 [0.2] kg; P<.001), waist circumference
istration (FDA) for approval in the United States. How- (−6.1 [0.2] cm vs −2.5 [0.3] cm; P<.001), and level of
ever, in 2007, the FDA’s Endocrine and Metabolic Drugs triglycerides (percentage change, −5.3 [1.2] vs 7.9 [2.0];
Advisory Committee (EMDAC) concluded the French P<.001) and a greater increase in level of high-density
manufacturer Sanofi-Aventis failed to demonstrate the lipoprotein cholesterol (percentage change, 12.6 [0.5] vs
safety of rimonabant and voted against recommending 5.4 [0.7]; P<.001).” [10]
219
220 CHAPTER 168. RIMONABANT
168.5 Preparation
168.2.3 Addiction behaviors
The chemical synthesis of rimonabant is described as
follows:[20]
Rimonabant reduced resumption of cocaine-seeking re-
sponses triggered by two of the three most common trig-
gers of relapse in humans: priming and cues. It may also
reduce ethanol- and opiate-seeking behavior.[12]
[2] “Zimulti Acomplia Report - Diet Drug Acomplia / Zi- [16] Keeney BK, et al. (2008). “Differential response
multi Gets Thumbs Down From FDA Panel”. Acompli- to a selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist
areport.com. 2007-06-13. Retrieved 2010-03-19. (SR141716: rimonabant) in female mice from lines
selectively bred for high voluntary wheel-running
[3] Fong TM, Heymsfield SB (September 2009). behavior”. Behavioural Pharmacology 19 (8): 812–
“Cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists: current 820. doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e32831c3b6b. PMID
understanding of mechanism of action and unan- 19020416.
swered questions”. Int J Obes (Lond) 33 (9): 947–55.
doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.132. PMID 19597516. [17] Aguila S, et al. (2010). “Rimonabant (SR141716) in-
duces metabolism and acquisition of fertilizing ability
[4] Auteur: Femke Gebruers. “Article from the Belgian in human sperm”. Br J Pharmacol 159 (4): 831–41.
newspaper De Standaard”. Standaard.be. Retrieved doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00570.x. PMC 2829209.
2010-03-19. PMID 20067470.
[5] “Article from the Swedish TV station TV 4 website”. [18] “Kassen müssen nicht für “Acomplia” zahlen”. tagess-
Tv4.se. 2008-03-06. Retrieved 2010-03-19. chau.de. 2006-10-17. Retrieved 2007-06-13.
[6] “European Medicines Agency”. Ema.europa.eu/ema/. [19] “Suicide risk fears over diet pill”. BBC News. 15 June
2010-02-15. Retrieved 2010-03-19. 2007. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
[7] “Sanofi-aventis - A diversified healthcare company, fo- [20] Yoshioka, T., et al. (1989). “Studies on hindered
cused on patients’ needs”. En.sanofi-aventis.com. Re- phenols and analogs. 1. Hypolipidemic and hypo-
trieved 2010-03-19. glycemic agents with ability to inhibit lipid peroxida-
tion”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 32 (2): 421.
[8] “Microsoft Word - Zimulti _Rimonabant_ Public State- doi:10.1021/jm00122a022. PMID 2913302.
ment” (PDF). Retrieved 2010-03-19.
Rosonabant
169.2 References
[1] Janero DR, Makriyannis A (March 2009). “Cannabinoid
receptor antagonists: pharmacological opportunities,
clinical experience, and translational prognosis”. Ex-
pert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 14 (1): 43–65.
doi:10.1517/14728210902736568. PMID 19249987.
[4] Lee HK, Choi EB, Pak CS (2009). “The current sta-
tus and future perspectives of studies of cannabinoid
receptor 1 antagonists as anti-obesity agents”. Cur-
rent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 9 (6): 482–503.
doi:10.2174/156802609788897844. PMID 19689362.
222
Chapter 170
S-444,823
170.2 References
[1] Arimura A. Novel Use of Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist.
Patent WO 2005/016351
223
Chapter 171
SDB-001
This article is about the cannabinoid drug. For the South adamantyl)−1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AP-
Korean girl band, see 2NE1. For the metabotropic INACA), and detection of five synthetic cannabinoids,
glutamate receptor antagonist, see APICA (drug). AM-1220, AM-2233, AM-1241, CB-13 (CRA-13), and
AM-1248, as designer drugs in illegal products”. Forensic
Toxicology 30 (2): 114. doi:10.1007/s11419-012-0136-
SDB-001 (2NE1, APICA, N-(1-adamantyl)−1- 7.
pentyl-1H-indole-3-carboxamide) is a drug that acts
as a potent agonist for the cannabinoid receptors. It [2] Uchiyama, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-Hanajiri, R.;
had never previously been reported in the scientific or Goda, Y. (2012). “URB-754: A new class of de-
signer drug and 12 synthetic cannabinoids detected in il-
patent literature, and was first identified by laboratories
legal products”. Forensic Science International 227 (1–
in Japan in March 2012 as an ingredient in synthetic 3): 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.047. PMID
cannabis smoking blends, along with a related compound 23063179.
APINACA (sold as “AKB48”).[1] Structurally it closely
resembles cannabinoid compounds from patent WO [3] Banister, S. D.; Wilkinson, S. M.; Longworth, M.;
2003/035005 but with an indole core instead of indazole, Stuart, J.; Apetz, N.; English, K.; Brooker, L.;
and a simple pentyl chain on the indole 1-position. Goebel, C.; Hibbs, D. E.; Glass, M.; Connor, M.;
Pharmacological testing determined SDB-001 to have McGregor, I. S.; Kassiou, M. (2013). “The syn-
thesis and pharmacological evaluation of adamantane-
an IC50 of 175nM at CB1 , only slightly less potent than
derived indoles: Novel cannabimimetic drugs of abuse”.
JWH-018 which had an IC50 of 169nM, but over four ACS Chemical Neuroscience 4 (7): 130403084729007.
times more tightly binding than AKB48, which had an doi:10.1021/cn400035r.
IC50 of 824nM.[2] The first published synthesis and
pharmacological evaluation of SDB-001 revealed that it
acts as a full agonist at CB1 (EC50 = 34 nM) and CB2
receptors (EC50 = 29 nM).[3] Furthermore, SDB-001
possesses cannabis-like effects in rats, and appears to be
less potent than JWH-018 but more potent than THC.[3]
• QUCHIC
• JWH-018
• SDB-006
• STS-135 (drug)
171.2 References
[1] Uchiyama, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kikura-Hanajiri,
R.; Goda, Y. (2012). “Identification of two new-
type synthetic cannabinoids, N-(1-adamantyl)−1-
pentyl-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (APICA) and N-(1-
224
Chapter 172
SDB-006
• STS-135_(drug)
172.2 References
[1] Banister, S. D.; Wilkinson, S. M.; Longworth, M.;
Stuart, J.; Apetz, N.; English, K.; Brooker, L.;
Goebel, C.; Hibbs, D. E.; Glass, M.; Connor, M.;
McGregor, I. S.; Kassiou, M. (2013). “The syn-
thesis and pharmacological evaluation of adamantane-
derived indoles: Novel cannabimimetic drugs of abuse”.
ACS Chemical Neuroscience 4 (7): 130403084729007.
doi:10.1021/cn400035r.
225
Chapter 173
SER-601
173.2 References
[1] Contartese, A.; Valoti, M.; Corelli, F.; Pasquini, S.; Mug-
naini, C.; Pessina, F.; Aldinucci, C.; Sgaragli, G.; Frosini,
M. (2012). “A novel CB2 agonist, COR167, potently pro-
tects rat brain cortical slices against OGD and reperfu-
sion injury”. Pharmacological Research 66 (6): 555–563.
doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.08.003. PMID 23036353.
226
Chapter 174
Serinolamide A
• Perrottetinene
174.2 References
[1] Gutiérrez, M.; Pereira, A. R.; Debonsi, H. M.; Li-
gresti, A.; Di Marzo, V.; Gerwick, W. H. (2011).
“Cannabinomimetic Lipid from a Marine Cyanobac-
terium”. Journal of Natural Products 74 (10): 2313–
2317. doi:10.1021/np200610t. PMC 3325759. PMID
21999614.
227
Chapter 175
SR-144,528
SR144528 is a drug that acts as a potent and highly se- 747–57. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00126-X. PMID
lective CB2 receptor inverse agonist, with a Kᵢ of 0.6nM 12809695.
at CB2 and 400nM at the related CB1 receptor.[1][2] It
[5] Páldy E, et al. (December 2008). “CB(2) cannabinoid re-
is used in scientific research for investigating the func-
ceptor antagonist SR144528 decreases mu-opioid recep-
tion of the CB2 receptor,[3][4][5] as well as for studying tor expression and activation in mouse brainstem: role
the effects of CB1 receptors in isolation, as few CB1 ag- of CB(2) receptor in pain”. Neurochemistry International
onists that do not also show significant activity as CB2 ag- 53 (6-8): 309–16. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2008.08.005.
onists are available.[6][7][8] It has also been found to be an PMID 18804501.
inhibitor of acyl-coenzymeA:cholesterol acyltransferase,
an effect that appears to be independent from its action [6] Lay L, Angus JA, Wright CE (March 2000). “Pharmaco-
logical characterisation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in
on CB2 receptors.[9]
the rat and mouse”. European Journal of Pharmacology
391 (1-2): 151–61. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00062-
5. PMID 10720647.
175.1 See also [7] Germanò MP, et al. (February 2001). “Cannabinoid
CB1-mediated inhibition of stress-induced gastric ulcers
• NESS-040C5 in rats”. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharma-
cology 363 (2): 241–4. doi:10.1007/s002100000360.
• SR141716 PMID 11218077.
• N-(S)-Fenchyl-1-(2-morpholinoethyl)−7- [8] Abalo R, et al. (June 2010). “The cannabinoid an-
methoxyindole-3-carboxamide tagonist SR144528 enhances the acute effect of WIN
55,212-2 on gastrointestinal motility in the rat”. Neuro-
gastroenterology and Motility : the Official Journal of the
European Gastrointestinal Motility Society 22 (6): 694–
175.2 References e206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01466.x. PMID
20132133.
[1] Rinaldi-Carmona M, et al. (February 1998). “SR
144528, the first potent and selective antagonist of the [9] Thewke D, et al. (April 2009). “AM-251 and SR144528
CB2 cannabinoid receptor”. The Journal of Pharma- are acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors”. Bio-
cology and Experimental Therapeutics 284 (2): 644–50. chemical and Biophysical Research Communications 381
PMID 9454810. (2): 181–6. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.020. PMC
2665256. PMID 19338772.
[2] Portier M, et al. (February 1999). “SR 144528, an an-
tagonist for the peripheral cannabinoid receptor that be-
haves as an inverse agonist”. The Journal of Pharma-
cology and Experimental Therapeutics 288 (2): 582–9.
PMID 9918562.
228
Chapter 176
Stearoylethanolamide
176.1 References
Binding, degradation and apoptotic activity of
stearoylethanolamide in rat C6 glioma cells
229
Chapter 177
STS-135 (drug)
STS-135 (N-(adamantan-1-yl)−1-(5-
fluoropentyl)−1H-indole-3-carboxamide) is a
designer drug offered by online vendors as a
cannabimimetic agent. The structure of STS-135
appears to utilise an understanding of structure-activity
relationships within the indole class of cannabimimetics,
although its design origins are unclear. STS-135 is
the terminally-fluorinated analogue of SDB-001, just
as AM-2201 is the terminally-fluorinated analogue of
JWH-018, and XLR-11 is the terminally-fluorinated ana-
logue of UR-144. No information regarding the in vitro
or in vivo activity of STS-135 has been published, and
only anecdotal reports are known of its pharmacology in
humans or other animals.
177.1 Detection
A forensic standard of STS-135 is available, and the com-
pound has been posted on the Forendex website of poten-
tial drugs of abuse.[1]
• APINACA
• AM-2201
• JWH-018
• SDB-001
177.3 References
[1] Southern Association of Forensic Scientists
230
Chapter 178
Surinabant
Surinabant (SR147778) is a cannabinoid receptor type erties of alcohol in alcohol-preferring sP rats. Alcohol and
1 antagonist developed by Sanofi-Aventis.[1] It is being in- Alcoholism. 2005 Jan-Feb;40(1):46-53. PMID 15582988
vestigated as a potential treatment for nicotine addiction,
[5] Lallemand F, De Witte P. SR147778, a CB1 cannabi-
to assist smoking cessation. It may also be developed
noid receptor antagonist, suppresses ethanol preference
as an anorectic drug to assist with weight loss, how- in chronically alcoholized Wistar rats. Alcohol. 2006
ever there are already several CB1 antagonists or inverse Jul;39(3):125-34. PMID 17127132
agonists on the market or under development for this
application,[2] so surinabant is at present mainly being de- [6] Louis C, Terranova JP, Decobert M, Bizot JC, Francon D,
veloped as an anti-smoking drug,[3] with possible appli- Alonso R, Cohen C, Griebel G. Surinabant, a new CB1 re-
cation in the treatment of other addictive disorders such ceptor antagonist, displays efficacy in animal models of at-
tention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavioural Phar-
as alcoholism.[4][5] Other potential applications such as
macology 2005; 16:S42.
treatment of ADHD have also been proposed.[6]
178.2 References
[1] Rinaldi-Carmona M, Barth F, Congy C, Martinez S,
Oustric D, Pério A, Poncelet M, Maruani J, Arnone
M, Finance O, Soubrié P, Le Fur G. SR147778
[5-(4-bromophenyl)−1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)−4-ethyl-
N-(1-piperidinyl)−1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide], a new
potent and selective antagonist of the CB1 cannabinoid
receptor: biochemical and pharmacological charac-
terization. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental
Therapeutics. 2004 Sep;310(3):905-14. PMID 15131245
231
Chapter 179
Taranabant
Taranabant (codenamed MK-0364) is a cannabinoid to assess the safety and efficacy of the CB1R inverse ag-
receptor type 1 inverse agonist being investigated as onist taranabant in overweight and obese patients with
a potential treatment for obesity due to its anorectic type 2 diabetes”. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 12 (6):
effects.[1][2] It was discovered by Merck & Co. 517–31. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01188.x. PMID
20518807.
In October 2008, Merck has stopped its phase III clinical
trials with the drugs due to high level of central side ef- [6] Proietto J, Rissanen A, Harp JB, Erondu N, Yu Q,
fects, mainly depression and anxiety.[3][4][5][6] Suryawanshi S, Jones ME, Johnson-Levonas AO, Heyms-
field SB, Kaufman KD, Amatruda JM (August 2010). “A
clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of the CB1R
inverse agonist taranabant in obese and overweight pa-
179.1 See also tients: low-dose study”. International Journal of Obe-
sity (2005) 34 (8): 1243–54. doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.38.
PMID 20212496.
• Cannabinoid receptor antagonist
179.2 References
[1] Armstrong HE, Galka A, Lin LS, Lanza TJ Jr, Jewell JP,
Shah SK, et al. “Substituted acyclic sulfonamides as hu-
man cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonists.” Bioorganic
& Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2007 Apr 15;17(8):2184-
7. PMID 17293109. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.087
[2] Fong TM, Guan XM, Marsh DJ, Shen CP, Strib-
ling DS, Rosko KM, et al. “Antiobesity efficacy
of a novel cannabinoid-1 receptor inverse agonist,
N-[(1S,2S)−3-(4-chlorophenyl)−2-(3-cyanophenyl)−1-
methylpropyl]−2-methyl-2-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-
2-yl]oxy]propanamide (MK-0364), in rodents.”
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Thera-
peutics. 2007 Jun;321(3):1013-22. PMID 17327489.
doi:10.1124/jpet.106.118737
232
Chapter 180
Tedalinab
180.2 References
[1] Glenmark’s Molecule for Neuropathic Pain, Osteoarthri-
tis - GRC 10693, Successfully Completes Phase I Trials.
April 13, 2009.
233
Chapter 181
Tetrad test
234
Chapter 182
Tetrahydrocannabinol
“THC” redirects here. For other uses, see THC (disam- the periaqueductal gray.[16] Other effects include relax-
biguation). ation, alteration of visual, auditory, and olfactory senses,
fatigue, and appetite stimulation. THC has marked
antiemetic properties. It may acutely reduce aggression
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or more precisely
9
its main isomer (−)-trans-Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol and increase aggression during withdrawal.[17]
( (6aR,10aR)-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), is the Due to its partial agonistic activity, THC appears to re-
principal psychoactive constituent (or cannabinoid) of sult in greater downregulation of cannabinoid receptors
the cannabis plant. First isolated in 1964 by Israeli than endocannabinoids, further limiting its efficacy over
scientists Raphael Mechoulam and Yechiel Gaoni at the other cannabinoids. While tolerance may limit the maxi-
Weizmann Institute of Science[8][9][10] it is a water-clear mal effects of certain drugs, evidence suggests that toler-
glassy solid when cold, which becomes viscous and ance develops irregularly for different effects with greater
sticky if warmed. A pharmaceutical formulation of resistance for primary over side-effects, and may actu-
(−)-trans-Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol, known by its INN ally serve to enhance the drug’s therapeutic window.[18]
dronabinol, is available by prescription in the U.S. and However, this form of tolerance appears to be irregu-
Canada under the brand name Marinol. An aromatic lar throughout mouse brain areas. THC, as well as other
terpenoid, THC has a very low solubility in water, but cannabinoids that contain a phenol group, possesses mild
good solubility in most organic solvents, specifically antioxidant activity sufficient to protect neurons against
lipids and alcohols.[7] Along with CBD, CBN, CBC, oxidative stress, such as that produced by glutamate-
CBG and other 80 molecules make up the phytocannabi- induced excitotoxicity.[19]
noid family, found in different quantities in Cannabis
Sativa plants.[11]
Like most pharmacologically-active secondary metabo- 182.1.1 Appetite and taste
lites of plants, THC in cannabis is assumed to be involved
in self-defense, perhaps against herbivores.[12] THC also It has long been known that, in humans, cannabis in-
possesses high UV-B (280–315 nm) absorption proper- creases appetite and consumption of food. The mecha-
ties, which, it has been speculated, could protect the plant nism for appetite stimulation in subjects is believed to re-
from harmful UV radiation exposure.[13][14][15] sult from activity in the gastro-hypothalamic axis. CB1
Tetrahydrocannabinol with double bond isomers and their activity in the hunger centers in the hypothalamus in-
stereoisomers is one of only three cannabinoids scheduled creases the palatability of food when levels of a hunger
by Convention on Psychotropic Substances (the other two hormone ghrelin increase prior to consuming a meal.
are dimethylheptylpyran and parahexyl). Cannabis as a After chyme is passed into the duodenum, signaling
plant is scheduled by the Single Convention on Narcotic hormones such as cholecystokinin and leptin are released,
Drugs (Schedule I and IV). causing reduction in gastric emptying and transmission of
satiety signals to the hypothalamus. Cannabinoid activity
is reduced through the satiety signals induced by leptin
release.
182.1 Effects
A study in mice suggested that based on the connec-
tion between palatable food and stimulation of dopamine
See also: Effects of cannabis, Long-term effects of (DA) transmission in the shell of the nucleus accumbens
cannabis and Cannabis in pregnancy (NAc), cannabis may not only stimulate taste, but pos-
sibly the hedonic (pleasure) value of food as well. The
THC has mild to moderate analgesic effects, and cannabis study later demonstrates habitual use of THC lessening
can be used to treat pain by altering transmitter re- this heightened pleasure response, indicating a possible
lease on dorsal root ganglion of the spinal cord and in similarity in humans.[20] The inconsistency between DA
235
236 CHAPTER 182. TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL
182.2 Chemistry
182.2.2 Isomerism
rated as Class I quality.[22] The study found evidence sup- • Epilepsy. Data was considered insufficient to judge
porting the effectiveness of cannabis extracts and THC in the utility of cannabis products in reducing seizure
treating certain symptoms of multiple sclerosis, but found frequency or severity.[22]
insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of
cannabis products in treating several other neurological
diseases.[22] 182.3.4 Other studies in humans
with placebo. Detailed informa- cannabis use is associated with a two-fold increase in the
tion regarding side effects was not risk of psychosis, but that cannabis use is “neither neces-
available from all trials, but nau- sary nor sufficient” to cause psychosis.[41] A French re-
sea, increased weakness, behavioral view from 2009 came to a conclusion that cannabis use,
or mood changes, suicidal ideation, particularly that before age 15, was a factor in the devel-
hallucinations, dizziness, and vaso- opment of schizophrenic disorders.[42]
vagal symptoms, fatigue, and feel- Some studies have suggested that cannabis users have
ings of intoxication were each de- a greater risk of developing psychosis than non-users.
scribed as side effects in at least
This risk is most pronounced in cases with an existing
2 trials. There was a single death risk of psychotic disorder.[43][44] A 2005 paper from the
rated by the investigator as “possi-
Dunedin study suggested an increased risk in the develop-
bly related” to treatment. This per- ment of psychosis linked to polymorphisms in the COMT
son had a seizure followed by aspi-
gene.[45] However, a more recent study cast doubt on the
ration pneumonia. The paper does proposed connection between this gene and the effects of
not describe whether this was one
cannabis on the development of psychosis.[46]
of the patients from the epilepsy
trials.[22] A 2008 German review reported that cannabis was a
causal factor in some cases of schizophrenia and stressed
the need for better education among the public due to in-
182.4.2 Cognitive effects creasingly relaxed access to cannabis.[47]
182.10 See also [7] Garrett ER, Hunt CA (July 1974). “Physicochemi-
cal properties, solubility, and protein binding of Δ9 -
• Anandamide tetrahydrocannabinol”. J. Pharm. Sci. 63 (7): 1056–64.
doi:10.1002/jps.2600630705. PMID 4853640.
• Cannabis (drug)
[8] Gaoni Y, Mechoulam R (1964). “Isolation, structure and
• Psychoactive drug partial synthesis of an active constituent of hashish”. Jour-
nal of the American Chemical Society 86 (8): 1646–1647.
• Cannabinoids doi:10.1021/ja01062a046.
• 11-Hydroxy-THC, metabolite of THC [9] “Interview with the winner of the first ECNP Life-
time Achievement Award: Raphael Mechoulam, Israel”.
• Anandamide, 2-Arachidonoylglycerol, en- February 2007.
dogenous cannabinoid agonists
[10] Geller, Tom (2007). “Cannabinoids: A Secret History”.
• Cannabidiol (CBD), an isomer of THC Chemical Heritage Newsmagazine 25 (2). Archived from
• Cannabinol (CBN), a metabolite of THC the original on 19 June 2008.
• Dimethylheptylpyran [11] Alchimiaweb Blog, Cannabinoids and their medicinal
• Parahexyl properties
• Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, the biosynthetic [12] Pate, David W. (1994). “Chemical ecology of Cannabis”.
precursor for THC Journal of the International Hemp Association 1 (29): 32–
37.
• HU-210, WIN 55,212-2, JWH-133, synthetic
cannabinoid agonists [13] Pate, David W. (1983). “Possible role of ultraviolet ra-
diation in evolution of Cannabis chemotypes”. Economic
• Medical cannabis Botany 37 (4): 396–405. doi:10.1007/BF02904200.
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.10.018. PMC 3705914. [31] Walker JM, Huang SM (August 2002). “Cannabi-
PMID 22063718. noid analgesia”. Pharmacol. Ther. 95 (2): 127–35.
doi:10.1016/S0163-7258(02)00252-8. PMID 12182960.
[21] Mechoulam R (1970). “Marihuana chemistry”. Science "...to date, there are no deaths known to have resulted from
168 (3936): 1159–66. Bibcode:1970Sci...168.1159M. overdose of cannabis. (p. 128)"
doi:10.1126/science.168.3936.1159. PMID 4910003.
[32] Thomas G, Kloner RA, Rezkalla S (January 2014). “Ad-
[22] Koppel BS, Brust JC, Fife T, Bronstein J, Youssof verse cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vas-
S, Gronseth G, Gloss D (April 2014). “System- cular effects of marijuana inhalation: what cardiologists
atic review: Efficacy and safety of medical mari- need to know”. Am. J. Cardiol. 113 (1): 187–90.
juana in selected neurologic disorders: Report of the doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.042. PMID 24176069.
Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American
Academy of Neurology”. Neurology 82 (17): 1556– [33] Aryana A, Williams MA (May 2007). “Marijuana as
63. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000363. PMID a trigger of cardiovascular events: speculation or sci-
24778283. entific certainty?". Int. J. Cardiol. 118 (2): 141–4.
doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.001. PMID 17005273.
[23] Krishnan S, Cairns R, Howard R (2009). “Cannabi-
noids for the treatment of dementia”. In Krishnan, [34] “DRONABINOL capsule [American Health Packag-
Sarada. “Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews”. ing]". National Library of Medicine. Daily Med. July
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (2): 2012. Retrieved 12 January 2014. “The estimated lethal
CD007204. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007204.pub2. human dose of intravenous dronabinol is 30 mg/kg (2100
PMID 19370677. mg/70 kg). Significant CNS symptoms in antiemetic
studies followed oral doses of 0.4 mg/kg (28 mg/70 kg)
[24] “Cannabis and Cannabinoids”. National Cancer Institute.
of dronabinol capsules.”
Retrieved 12 January 2014.
[35] “Medical Marijuana”. Multidisciplinary Association for
[25] Haney M, Gunderson EW, Rabkin J, Hart CL, Vos-
Psychoactive Substances. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
burg SK, Comer SD, Foltin RW (2007). “Dronabi-
nol and marijuana in HIV-positive marijuana smok-
[36] Crean RD, Crane NA, Mason BJ (March 2011). “An
ers. Caloric intake, mood, and sleep”. Journal of
evidence based review of acute and long-term effects of
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 45 (5): 545–
cannabis use on executive cognitive functions”. J Addict
54. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31811ed205. PMID
Med 5 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e31820c23fa.
17589370.
PMC 3037578. PMID 21321675.
[26] Abrams DI, Hilton JF, Leiser RJ, Shade SB, Elbeik TA,
Aweeka FT, Benowitz NL, Bredt BM, Kosel B, Aberg JA, [37] Martín-Santos R, Fagundo AB, Crippa JA, Atakan
Deeks SG, Mitchell TF, Mulligan K, Bacchetti P, Mc- Z, Bhattacharyya S, Allen P, Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt
Cune JM, Schambelan M (2003). “Short-term effects of S, Seal M, Busatto GF, McGuire P (March 2010).
cannabinoids in patients with HIV-1 infection: a random- “Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review
ized, placebo-controlled clinical trial”. Annals of Internal of the literature”. Psychol Med 40 (3): 383–98.
Medicine 139 (4): 258–66. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139- doi:10.1017/S0033291709990729. PMID 19627647.
4-200308190-00008. PMID 12965981.
[38] Grant I, Gonzalez R, Carey CL, Natarajan L, Wolf-
[27] Grotenhermen, Franjo; Russo, Ethan, eds. (2002). son T (2003). “Non-acute (residual) neurocognitive ef-
“Review of Therapeutic Effects”. Cannabis and Cannabi- fects of cannabis use: A meta-analytic study”. Jour-
noids: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Po- nal of the International Neuropsychological Society 9 (5).
tential. New York City: Psychology Press. p. 124. doi:10.1017/S1355617703950016. PMID 12901774.
ISBN 978-0-7890-1508-2. “The only approved prepara- Lay summary – WebMD (1 July 2003).
tions to date, Marinol (dronabinol, Δ9 -THC) and Cesamet
(nabilone), are approved for the indication of nausea and [39] Large M, Sharma S, Compton MT, Slade T, Nielssen O
vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy. Marinol (June 2011). “Cannabis use and earlier onset of psychosis:
is also approved for anorexia and cachexia in HIV/AIDS.” a systematic meta-analysis”. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
68 (6): 555–61. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.5.
[28] “Marijuana (Cannabis)". National Multiple Sclerosis So- PMID 21300939.
ciety. Retrieved 5 September 2009.
[40] Semple DM, McIntosh AM, Lawrie SM (March 2005).
[29] ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00965809 Add on Study on Δ9- “Cannabis as a risk factor for psychosis: systematic re-
THC Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) view”. J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxford) 19 (2): 187–94.
(THC_PTSD) doi:10.1177/0269881105049040. PMID 15871146.
[30] Hannigan WC, Destree R, Truong XT (1986). “The ef- [41] Arseneault L, Cannon M, Witton J, Murray RM (2004).
fect of delta-9-THC on human spasticity”. American So- “Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: ex-
ciety for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Eighty- amination of the evidence”. The British Journal of Psy-
seventh Annual Meeting, March 20–22, 1986 39: 198, ab- chiatry 184 (2): 110–117. doi:10.1192/bjp.184.2.110.
stract B45. PMID 14754822.
182.11. REFERENCES 243
[42] Laqueille X (2009). “Le cannabis est-il un fac- Shop”. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 34 (4): 196–203.
teur de vulnérabilité des troubles schizophrènes?" [Is doi:10.1093/jat/34.4.196. PMID 20465865.
cannabis is a vulnerability factor of schizophrenic dis-
orders?]. Archives de Pédiatrie 16 (9): 1302–5. [51] Baselt, R. (2011). Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemi-
doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2009.03.016. PMID 19640690. cals in Man (9th ed.). Seal Beach, CA: Biomedical Pub-
(registration required (help)). lications. pp. 1644–8.
[43] Moore TH, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, Barnes TR, [52] Lupica CR, Riegel AC, Hoffman AF (2004). “Marijuana
Jones PB, Burke M, Lewis G (2007). “Cannabis use and and cannabinoid regulation of brain reward circuits”.
risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a British Journal of Pharmacology 143 (2): 227–34.
systematic review”. The Lancet 370 (9584): 319–28. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705931. PMC 1575338. PMID
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61162-3. PMID 17662880. 15313883.
[44] Henquet C, Krabbendam L, Spauwen J, Kaplan C, Lieb R, [53] Solinas M, Scherma M, Fattore L, Stroik J, Wertheim C,
Wittchen HU, van Os J (2005). “Prospective cohort study Tanda G, Fratta W, Goldberg SR (2007). “Nicotinic 7
of cannabis use, predisposition for psychosis, and psy- Receptors as a New Target for Treatment of Cannabis
chotic symptoms in young people”. BMJ 330 (7481): 11– Abuse”. Journal of Neuroscience 27 (21): 5615–
0. doi:10.1136/bmj.38267.664086.63. PMC 539839. 20. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0027-07.2007. PMID
PMID 15574485. 17522306. Lay summary – New Scientist (22 May 2007).
[45] Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Cannon M, McClay J, Murray [54] “PDSP Database – UNC”. NIMH Psychoactive Drug
R, Harrington H, Taylor A, Arseneault L, Williams B, Screening Program. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
Braithwaite A, Poulton R, Craig IW (2005). “Moderation
of the Effect of Adolescent-Onset Cannabis Use on Adult [55] Rashidi H, Akhtar MT, van der Kooy F, Verpoorte R,
Psychosis by a Functional Polymorphism in the Catechol- Duetz WA (November 2009). “Hydroxylation and Fur-
O-Methyltransferase Gene: Longitudinal Evidence of a ther Oxidation of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol by Alkane-
Gene X Environment Interaction”. Biological Psychiatry Degrading Bacteria” (PDF). Appl Environ Microbiol 75
57 (10): 1117–27. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.026. (22): 7135–7141. doi:10.1128/AEM.01277-09. PMC
PMID 15866551. 2786519. PMID 19767471. "Δ9-THC and many of its
derivatives are highly lipophilic and poorly water soluble.
[46] Zammit S, Spurlock G, Williams H, Norton N, Williams Calculations of the n-octanol/water partition coefficient
N, O'Donovan MC, Owen MJ; Spurlock (2007). “Geno- (Ko/w) of Δ9-THC at neutral pH vary between 6,000, us-
type effects of CHRNA7, CNR1 and COMT in ing the shake flask method, and 9.44 × 106, by reverse-
schizophrenia: interactions with tobacco and cannabis phase high-performance liquid chromatography estima-
use”. The British Journal of Psychiatry 191 (5): 402–7. tion.”
doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.036129. PMID 17978319. Lay
summary – MedWireNews. [56] Ashton CH (February 2001). “Pharmacology and effects
of cannabis: a brief review”. Br J Psychiatry 178: 101–
[47] Kawohl W, Rössler W (2008). “Cannabis and 106. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.101. PMID 11157422. “Be-
Schizophrenia: new findings in an old debate”. Neuropsy- cause they are extremely lipid soluble, cannabinoids ac-
chiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation cumulate in fatty tissues, reaching peak concentrations in
: Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und 4–5 days. They are then slowly released back into other
Psychiater 22 (4): 223–9. PMID 19080993. body compartments, including the brain. ... Within the
brain, THC and other cannabinoids are differentially dis-
[48] Jayanthi S, Buie S, Moore S, Herning RI, Better W, Wil- tributed. High concentrations are reached in neocortical,
son NM, Contoreggi C, Cadet JL (2008). “Heavy mar- limbic, sensory and motor areas.”
ijuana users show increased serum apolipoprotein C-III
levels: evidence from proteomic analyses”. Molecular [57] Huestis MA (August 2007). “Human cannabinoid
Psychiatry 15 (1): 101–112. doi:10.1038/mp.2008.50. pharmacokinetics”. Chem Biodivers 4 (8): 1770–804.
PMC 2797551. PMID 18475272. Lay summary – doi:10.1002/cbdv.200790152. PMC 2689518. PMID
Reuters (May 13, 2008). 17712819. “THC is highly lipophilic and initially taken
up by tissues that are highly perfused, such as the lung,
[49] Schwilke EW, Schwope DM, Karschner EL, Lowe RH, heart, brain, and liver.”
Darwin WD, Kelly DL, Goodwin RS, Gorelick DA,
Huestis MA (2009). "Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), [58] Kathmann M, Flau K, Redmer A, Tränkle C, Schlicker
11-Hydroxy-THC, and 11-Nor-9-carboxy-THC Plasma E (February 2006). “Cannabidiol is an allosteric mod-
Pharmacokinetics during and after Continuous High- ulator at mu- and delta-opioid receptors”. Naunyn
Dose Oral THC”. Clinical Chemistry 55 (12): 2180–2189. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 372 (5): 354–61.
doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.122119. PMC 3196989. doi:10.1007/s00210-006-0033-x. PMID 16489449.
PMID 19833841.
[59] Watanabe K, Yamaori S, Funahashi T, Kimura T, Ya-
[50] Röhrich J, Schimmel I, Zörntlein S, Becker J, Drob- mamoto I (March 2007). “Cytochrome P450 enzymes
nik S, Kaufmann T, Kuntz V, Urban R (2010). “Con- involved in the metabolism of tetrahydrocannabinols and
centrations of Δ9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-Nor-9- cannabinol by human hepatic microsomes”. Life Science
Carboxytetrahydrocannabinol in Blood and Urine Af- 80 (15): 1415–9. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2006.12.032. PMID
ter Passive Exposure to Cannabis Smoke in a Coffee 17303175.
244 CHAPTER 182. TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL
[60] Huestis MA (2005). “Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism [72] “Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations – PART
of the Plant Cannabinoids, Δ9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol, 1308 — SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUB-
Cannabidiol and Cannabinol”. Cannabinoids. Hand- STANCES”. US Department of Justice. DEA Office of
book of Experimental Pharmacology 168 (168): 657–90. Diversion Control. Retrieved 12 January 2014. With
doi:10.1007/3-540-26573-2_23. ISBN 3-540-22565-X. changes through 77 F.R. 4235 (January 27, 2012).
PMID 16596792.
[73] Pickens JT (1981). “Sedative activity of cannabis
[61] Fellermeier M, Zenk MH (1998). “Prenylation of oliveto- in relation to its delta'-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol and
late by a hemp transferase yields cannabigerolic acid, the cannabidiol content”. British Journal of Pharmacology 72
precursor of tetrahydrocannabinol”. FEBS Letters 427 (2): (4): 649–56. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb09145.x.
283–5. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00450-5. PMID PMC 2071638. PMID 6269680.
9607329.
[74] Burns TL, Ineck JR (2006). “Cannabinoid Analgesia as
[62] Marks MD, Tian L, Wenger JP, Omburo SN, Soto- a Potential New Therapeutic Option in the Treatment of
Fuentes W, He J, Gang DR, Weiblen GD, Dixon Chronic Pain”. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 40 (2): 251–
RA (2009). “Identification of candidate genes affect- 260. doi:10.1345/aph.1G217. PMID 16449552.
ing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol biosynthesis in Cannabis
sativa”. Journal of Experimental Botany 60 (13): 3715– [75] MARINOL (dronabinol) capsule drug label/data at Daily
26. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp21. PMC 2736886. PMID Med from U.S. National Library of Medicine, National
19581347. Institutes of Health.
[63] Baker PB, Taylor BJ, Gough TA (June 1981). “The [76] McKim, William A (2002). Drugs and Behavior: An In-
tetrahydrocannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid troduction to Behavioral Pharmacology (5th ed.). Prentice
content of cannabis products”. J Pharm Pharmacol. 33 Hall. p. 400. ISBN 0-13-048118-1.
(6): 369–72. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1981.tb13806.x.
PMID 6115009. [77] Greenberg, Gary (1 November 2005). “Respectable
Reefer”. Mother Jones. Retrieved 8 April 2010.
[64] Razdan RK (1970). “Hashish. V. A stereospecific
synthesis of (-)−.DELTA.1-and (-).DELTA.1(6)- [78] “Cannabis and Cannabinoids (PDQ®)". Cancer Topics.
tetrahydrocannabinols”. Journal of the Amer- National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and
ican Chemical Society 92 (20): 6061–6062. Human Services.
doi:10.1021/ja00723a044.
[79] “Government eases restrictions on pot derivative”. Online
[65] Petrzilka T (1969). “Synthese von Haschisch-
Athens. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
Inhaltsstoffen. 4. Mitteilung”. Helvetica Chimica Acta 52
(4): 1102–1134. doi:10.1002/hlca.19690520427. [80] 51 Fed. Reg. 17476 (1986), Tuesday, May 13, 1986,
pages 17476-17478
[66] Jen T (1967). “Total synthesis of .DELTA.8-
(.DELTA.1(6)-tetrahydrocannabinol, a biologically
[81] Calhoun SR, Galloway GP, Smith DE (1998).
active constituent of hashish (marijuana)". Journal of
“Abuse potential of dronabinol (Marinol)". Jour-
the American Chemical Society 89 (17): 4551–4552.
nal of Psychoactive Drugs 30 (2): 187–96.
doi:10.1021/ja00993a071.
doi:10.1080/02791072.1998.10399689. PMID
[67] “List of psychotropic substances under international con- 9692381.
trol” (PDF). International Narcotics Control Board. p. 5.
[82] “Petition to Reschedule Cannabis (Marijuana)". Coalition
Archived from the original on 7 September 2005. Re-
for Rescheduling Cannabis. 9 October 2002.
trieved 20 April 2011. “This international non-proprietary
name refers to only one of the stereochemical variants
[83] “WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence”. World
of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, namely (-)-trans-delta-9-
Health Organization. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
tetrahydrocannabinol”
Tetrahydrocannabinol-C4
183.2 References
[1] Thomas, Adèle; Stevenson, Lesley A; Wease, Ker-
rie N; Price, Martin R; Baillie, Gemma; Ross, Ruth
A; Pertwee, Roger G (December 2005). “Evidence
that the plant cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin
is a cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonist”.
British Journal of Pharmacology 146 (7): 917–926.
doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706414. PMID 16205722.
[2] Harvey DJ. Characterization of the butyl homologues of
delta1-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabinol and cannabidiol
in samples of cannabis by combined gas chromatography
and mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmacy and Phar-
macology. 1976 Apr;28(4):280-5. PMID 6715
[3] Brown NK, Harvey DJ. In vivo metabolism of the n-butyl-
homologues of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and delta 8-
tetrahydrocannabinol by the mouse. Xenobiotica. 1988
Apr;18(4):417-27. PMID 2840781
246
Chapter 184
Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid
247
248 CHAPTER 184. TETRAHYDROCANNABINOLIC ACID
Tetrahydrocannabivarin
249
Chapter 186
THC-O-acetate
186.1 References
[1] Donald A. Cooper. Future Synthetic Drugs of Abuse.
Drug Enforcement Administration, McLean, Virginia
250
Chapter 187
THC-O-phosphate
187.1 References
[1] Yoshimura H, Watanabe K, Oguri K, Fujiwara M, Ueki S.
Synthesis and pharmacological activity of a phosphate es-
ter of delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 1978 Oct;21(10):1079-81.
251
Chapter 188
Tinabinol
• Nabitan
188.2 References
[1] David T. Brown (19 November 1998). Cannabis: The
Genus Cannabis. CRC Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-90-5702-
291-3. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
252
Chapter 189
URB602
189.1 References
[1] Tarzia, G; Duranti, A; Tontini, A; Piersanti, G; Mor, M;
Rivara, S; Plazzi, PV; Park, C et al. (2003). “Design,
synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of alkylcar-
bamic acid aryl esters, a new class of fatty acid amide hy-
drolase inhibitors”. Journal of Medical Chemistry 46 (12):
2352–60. doi:10.1021/jm021119g. PMID 12773040.
253
Chapter 190
URB754
190.1 References
[1] Makara JK, Mor M, Fegley D, Szabó SI, Kathuria S,
Astarita G, Duranti A, Tontini A, Tarzia G, Rivara S,
Freund TF, Piomelli D (2005). “Selective inhibition
of 2-AG hydrolysis enhances endocannabinoid signaling
in hippocampus”. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (9): 1139–41.
doi:10.1038/nn1521. PMID 16116451.
254
Chapter 191
VCHSR
191.1 References
[1] Hurst, DP; Lynch, DL; Barnett-Norris, J; Hyatt, SM;
Seltzman, HH; Zhong, M; Song, ZH; Nie, J et al. (2002).
“N-(piperidin-1-yl)−5-(4-chlorophenyl)−1-(2,4-
dichlorophenyl)−4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide
(SR141716A) interaction with LYS 3.28(192) is cru-
cial for its inverse agonism at the cannabinoid CB1
receptor”. Molecular Pharmacology 62 (6): 1274–87.
doi:10.1124/mol.62.6.1274. PMID 12435794.
255
Chapter 192
VDM-11
192.2 References
[1] VDM 11 at Sigma-Aldrich
256
Chapter 193
WIN 54,461
• WIN 55,212-2
193.2 References
[1] Howlett AC, Berglund B, Melvin LS (October 1995).
“Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists and Antagonists”. Cur-
rent Pharmaceutical Design 1 (3): 343–352.
257
Chapter 194
WIN 55,212-2
Pancreatic stellate cells. The cells in the lower frame are under 194.2 References
the action of WIN 55,212-2. They are thought to assume a more
"quiescent" phenotype. From Michalski et al., 2008.[1] [1] Michalski, C., et al. (2008). Gluud, Christian,
ed. “Cannabinoids Reduce Markers of Inflamma-
tion and Fibrosis in Pancreatic Stellate Cells”. PLoS
ONE 3 (2): e1701. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.1701M.
WIN 55,212-2 is a chemical described as an
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001701. PMC 2253501.
aminoalkylindole derivative, which produces effects sim- PMID 18301776.
ilar to those of cannabinoids such as tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC) but has an entirely different chemical struc- [2] Compton DR, et al. Aminoalkylindole Analogs:
ture.[2][3][4] Cannabimimetic Activity of a Class of Compounds Struc-
turally Distinct from Δ9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol. Journal
WIN 55,212-2 is a potent cannabinoid receptor agonist[5] of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1992;
that has been found to be a potent analgesic[6] in a rat 263(3):1118-1126.
model of neuropathic pain.[7] It activates p42 and p44
MAP kinase via receptor-mediated signaling.[8] [3] Ferraro, L.; Tomasini, M. C.; Gessa, G. L.; Bebe, B.
W.; Tanganelli, S.; Antonelli, T. (2001). “The Cannabi-
At 5 µM WIN 55,212-2 inhibit ATP production in sperm noid Receptor Agonist WIN 55,212-2 Regulates Gluta-
in a CB1 receptor-dependent fashion.[9] mate Transmission in Rat Cerebral Cortex: An in Vivo
258
194.3. EXTERNAL LINKS 259
and in Vitro Study”. Cerebral Cortex 11 (8): 728–733. • JNeurosci.org Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease
doi:10.1093/cercor/11.8.728. PMID 11459762. Pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection Me-
diated by Blockade of Microglial Activation
[4] Zhang, Q., et al. (2002). “In vitro
metabolism of R(+)−2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3- • New Scientist: Hope for cannabis-based drug for
(morpholinyl)methylpyrrolo 1,2,3-de1,4-benzoxazinyl- Alzheimer’s
(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate, a cannabinoid
receptor agonist”. Drug metabolism and disposition:
the biological fate of chemicals 30 (10): 1077–1086.
doi:10.1124/dmd.30.10.1077. PMID 12228183.
WIN 56,098
• WIN 55,225
195.2 References
[1] Howlett AC, Berglund B, Melvin LS (October 1995).
“Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists and Antagonists”. Cur-
rent Pharmaceutical Design 1 (3): 343–352.
260
Chapter 196
XLR-11 (drug)
A forensic standard for this compound is available, and [3] Frost JM, Dart MJ, Tietje KR, Garrison TR, Grayson
a representative mass spectrum has been posted on GK, Daza AV, El-Kouhen OF, Yao BB, Hsieh GC, Pai
Forendex.[4] An ELISA immunoassay technique for de- M, Zhu CZ, Chandran P, Meyer MD (January 2010).
tecting XLR-11 and UR-144 in blood and urine as part “Indol-3-ylcycloalkyl ketones: effects of N1 substituted
of general drug screens has been developed by Randox indole side chain variations on CB(2) cannabinoid re-
ceptor activity”. J. Med. Chem. 53 (1): 295–315.
Laboratories and Tulip Biolabs, Inc.[5]
doi:10.1021/jm901214q. PMID 19921781.
261
262 CHAPTER 196. XLR-11 (DRUG)
AM251
197.2 References
[1] Lan, R., Liu, Q., Fan, P., et al. Structure-activity rela-
tionships of pyrazole derivatives as cannabinoid receptor
antagonists. J Med Chem 42 769-776 (1999). PubMed
10052983
263
Chapter 198
Aminoalkylindole
198.1 Legality
Aminoalkylindole are now commonly found in synthetic
cannabis designer drugs.[2]
In the United States, the DEA added the aminoalkylin-
dole JWH-200 to Schedule I of the Controlled Substances
Act on 1 March 2011 for 12 months.[2][3]
198.2 References
[1] Emmanuel S. Onaivi (2006). Marijuana and Cannabinoid
Research: Methods and Protocols. Springer. pp. 128–.
ISBN 978-1-59259-999-8.
264
Chapter 199
Cannabipiperidiethanone
Cannabipiperidiethanone, (CPE, or 1-
(N-methylpiperidin-2-ylmethyl)−3-(2-
methoxyphenylacetyl)indole), is a synthetic cannabi-
noid that has been found as an ingredient of “herbal”
synthetic cannabis blends sold in Japan, alongside JWH-
122 and JWH-081. Its binding affinity was measured at
the CB1 and CB2 receptors and it was found to have an
IC50 of 591nM at CB1 and 968nM at CB2 , making it
2.3x and 9.4x weaker than JWH-250 at these two targets
respectively.[1]
• AM-1248
• AM-2233
• JWH-203
• RCS-8
199.2 References
[1] Uchiyama N, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Goda Y (2011). “Iden-
tification of a novel cannabimimetic phenylacetylindole,
cannabipiperidiethanone, as a designer drug in a herbal
product and its affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ re-
ceptors”. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 59 (9):
1203–5. doi:10.1248/cpb.59.1203. PMID 21881274.
265
Chapter 200
JWH-193
6-Methyl-JWH-200
• JWH-122
266
Chapter 201
JWH-198
201.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW. Recent Developments in
the Medicinal Chemistry of Cannabimimetic Indoles,
Pyrroles and Indenes. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2005;
12: 1395-1411.
267
Chapter 202
JWH-200
JWH-200 (WIN 55,225)[1] is an analgesic chemi- [3] Bell, MR, et al.. “Antinociceptive (aminoalkyl)indoles”.
cal from the aminoalkylindole family that acts as a Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 34 (3): 1099–1110.
cannabinoid receptor agonist. Its binding affinity at doi:10.1021/jm00107a034. PMID 1900533.
the CB1 receptor is 42nM, around the same as that of [4] Compton, DR, et al. (1992). “Aminoalkylindole analogs:
THC,[2] but its analgesic potency in vivo was higher than cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds struc-
that of other analogues with stronger CB1 binding affin- turally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol”. Jour-
ity in vitro,[3] around 3 times that of THC but with nal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 263
less sedative effect,[4] most likely reflecting favourable (3): 1118–26. PMID 1335057.
pharmacokinetic characteristics. It was discovered by,
and named after, Dr. John W. Huffman. [5] “Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Place-
ment of Four Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I”.
The US DEA temporarily declared JWH-200 a schedule DEA Office of Diversion Control. Retrieved 11 March
I controlled substance on 1 March 2011 through 76 FR 2014.
11075, and permanently instated the same schedule on 9
[6] http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-38.8/
July 2012 in the Section 1152 of the Food and Drug Ad-
ministration Safety and Innovation Act.[5] As of 26 June
2011, the drug is legal in Canada.[6]
• JWH-073
• CP-47,497
• HU-210
• A-796,260
• WIN 55,212-2
202.2 References
[1] Dutta, A. K. , E. A. ; Ryan, W.; Thomas, B. F.;
Singer, M.; Compton, D. R.; Martin, B. R.; Razdan,
R. K. (1997). “Synthesis, pharmacology, and molecu-
lar modeling of novel 4-alkyloxy indole derivatives re-
lated to cannabimimetic aminoalkyl indoles (AAIs)".
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 5 (8): 1591–1600.
doi:10.1016/S0968-0896(97)00111-9. PMID 9313864.
268
Chapter 203
Pravadoline
Pravadoline (WIN 48,098) is an antiinflammatory and The antinociceptive activity of pravadoline cannot be ex-
analgesic drug with an IC50 of 4.9 µM and a Kᵢ of plained by an opioid mechanism, because pravadoline-
2511nM at CB1 , related in structure to non-steroidal induced antinociception was not antagonized by naloxone
antinflammtory drugs (NSAIDs) such as indometacin. It (1 mg/kg, s.c.) and pravadoline did not bind to the opioid
was developed in the 1980s as a new antiinflammatory receptors at concentrations up to 10μM.[1]
and prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor, acting through in-
hibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX).
However, pravadoline was found to exhibit unexpect- 203.2 See also
edly strong analgesic effects, which appeared at doses
ten times smaller than the effective anti-inflammatory • AM-630 (6-iodopravadoline)
dose and so could not be explained by its action as a
COX inhibitor. These effects were not blocked by opi- • WIN 54,461 (6-bromopravadoline)
oid antagonists such as naloxone,[1] and it was eventu- • WIN 55,212-2
ally discovered that pravadoline represented the first com-
pound from a novel class of cannabinoid agonists, the • RCS-4 (1-pentyl-3-(4-methoxybenzoyl)indole)
aminoalkylindoles.[2]
Pravadoline was never developed for use as an analgesic,
partly due to toxicity concerns (although these were later 203.3 References
shown to be a result of the salt form that the drug had been
prepared in rather than from the pravadoline itself),[3] [1] Haubrich DR, et al. (1990). “Pharmacology of pravado-
however the discovery of cannabinoid activity in this line: a new analgesic agent”. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
structurally novel family of drugs led to the discovery 255 (2): 511–22. PMID 2243340.
of several new cannabinoid agonists, including the drug [2] Bell MR, et al. (1991). “Antinociceptive
WIN 55,212-2, which is now widely used in scientific (aminoalkyl)indoles”. J. Med. Chem. 34 (3): 1099–110.
research.[4][5] doi:10.1021/jm00107a034. PMID 1900533.
• Prolonged the response latency induced by tail im- [4] D'Ambra TE, et al. (1992). “Conformationally restrained
mersion in hot water at a temperature of 55 degrees analogues of pravadoline: nanomolar potent, enantios-
elective, (aminoalkyl)indole agonists of the cannabi-
Celsius (minimum effective dose, 100 mg/kg s.c.)
noid receptor”. J. Med. Chem. 35 (1): 124–35.
• Prevented hyperalgesia in rats with Brewer’s Yeast doi:10.1021/jm00079a016. PMID 1732519.
injections during (Randall-Selitto test) (minimum
[5] Compton DR, et al. (1992). “Aminoalkylindole analogs:
effective dose, 1 mg/kg, p.o.) cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds struc-
• Prevented the nociceptive response induced by paw turally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol”. J.
flexion in the adjuvant-arthritic rat (ED50,41 mg/kg, Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 263 (3): 1118–26. PMID
1335057.
p.o.)
• Prevented the nociceptive response of bradykinin-
induced head and forepaw flexion (ED50, 78 mg/kg,
p.o.)
269
Chapter 204
RCS-4
270
Chapter 205
Anandamide
271
272 CHAPTER 205. ANANDAMIDE
damide and other endocannabinoids in the brain.[18] High [2] Mechoulam R, Fride E (1995). “The unpaved road to the
fat diet feeding in mice increases levels of anandamide in endogenous brain cannabinoid ligands, the anandamides”.
the liver and increases lipogenesis.[19] This suggests that In Pertwee RG. Cannabinoid receptors. Boston: Aca-
anandamide may play a role in the development of obe- demic Press. pp. 233–258. ISBN 0-12-551460-3.
sity, at least in rodents. [3] Wang, J.; Ueda, N. (2009). “Biology of endo-
Paracetamol (or acetaminophen in the U.S.A.) is cannabinoid synthesis system”. Prostaglandins
metabolically combined with arachidonic acid by FAAH & Other Lipid Mediators 89 (3–4): 112–119.
doi:10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2008.12.002. PMID
to form AM404.[20] This metabolite of paracetamol is a
19126434.
potent agonist at the TRPV1 vanilloid receptor, a weak
agonist at both CB1 and CB2 receptors, and an inhibitor [4] Gaetani, S.; Dipasquale, P.; Romano, A.; Righetti, L.;
of anandamide reuptake. As a result, anandamide levels Cassano, T.; Piomelli, D.; Cuomo, V. (2009). “Chap-
in the body and brain are elevated. In this fashion, parac- ter 5 The Endocannabinoid System as A Target for Novel
etamol acts as a pro-drug for a cannabimimetic metabo- Anxiolytic and Antidepressant Drugs”. “International
lite. This action may be partially or fully responsible for Review of Neurobiology - 85”. International Review
the analgesic effects of paracetamol.[21][22] of Neurobiology 85. pp. 57–13. doi:10.1016/S0074-
7742(09)85005-8. ISBN 9780123748935.
There have been identified transport proteins for anan-
damide and its sister molecule 2-arachidonoylglycerol. [5] Hwang, J.; Adamson, C.; Butler, D.; Janero, D. R.;
Makriyannis, A.; Bahr, B. A. (2009). “Enhancement
These include the heat shock proteins (Hsp70s) and fatty
of endocannabinoid signaling by fatty acid amide
acid binding proteins (FABPs).[23][24]
hydrolase inhibition: A neuroprotective therapeutic
modality”. Life Sciences 86 (15–16): 615–623.
doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2009.06.003. PMC 2848893. PMID
205.4 Medical benefits 19527737.
205.5 See also [7] Pacher P, Batkai S, Kunos G; Bátkai; Kunos (2006).
“The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target
of Pharmacotherapy”. Pharmacol Rev. 58 (3): 389–
• Cannabinoids
462. doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.2. PMC 2241751. PMID
• Virodhamine 16968947.
reward”. Neuropsychopharmacology 32 (11): 2267–78. [21] Bertolini A et al. (2006). “Paracetamol: new vis-
doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301376. PMID 17406653. tas of an old drug”. CNS Drug Rev 12 (3–4): 250–
75. doi:10.1111/j.1527-3458.2006.00250.x. PMID
[13] De Petrocellis L et al. (July 1998). “The endogenous 17227290. |first3= missing |last3= in Authors list (help);
cannabinoid anandamide inhibits human breast cancer cell |first4= missing |last4= in Authors list (help); |first5= miss-
proliferation”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (14): ing |last5= in Authors list (help); |first6= missing |last6= in
8375–80. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.14.8375. PMC 20983. Authors list (help)
PMID 9653194. |first3= missing |last3= in Authors list
(help); |first4= missing |last4= in Authors list (help); [22] Sinning C et al. (December 2008). “New analgesics
|first5= missing |last5= in Authors list (help); |first6= miss- synthetically derived from the paracetamol metabolite
ing |last6= in Authors list (help); |first7= missing |last7= in N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-icosatetra-
Authors list (help) 5,8,11,14-enamide”. J. Med. Chem. 51 (24): 7800–5.
doi:10.1021/jm800807k. PMID 19053765. |first3=
[14] http://www.harford.de/arne/articles/NeuroReport.pdf missing |last3= in Authors list (help); |first4= missing
|last4= in Authors list (help); |first5= missing |last5= in
[15] di Tomaso E, Beltramo M, Piomelli D.; Beltramo; Pi- Authors list (help); |first6= missing |last6= in Authors
omelli (Aug 1996). “Brain cannabinoids in chocolate”. list (help); |first7= missing |last7= in Authors list (help);
Nature 382 (6593): 677–8. doi:10.1038/382677a0. |first8= missing |last8= in Authors list (help)
PMID 8751435.
[23] Kaczocha, M.; Glaser, S.T.; Deutsch, D.G. (2009).
“Identification of intracellular carriers for the endo-
[16] Natarajan V, Reddy PV, Schmid PC, Schmid HH;
cannabinoid anandamide”. Proceedings of the National
Reddy; Schmid; Schmid (August 1982). “N-
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106
Acylation of ethanolamine phospholipids in canine
(15): 6375–6380. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901515106. PMC
myocardium”. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 712 (2): 342–55.
2669397. PMID 19307565.
doi:10.1016/0005-2760(82)90352-6. PMID 7126608.
[24] Oddi, S.; Fezza, F.; Pasquariello, N.; D'Agostino, A.;
[17] Cadas H, di Tomaso E, Piomelli D; Di Tomaso; Piomelli Catanzaro, G.; De Simone, C.; Rapino, C.; Finazzi-
(February 1997). “Occurrence and biosynthesis of en- Agro, A.; Maccarrone, M. (2009). “Molecular identifi-
dogenous cannabinoid precursor, N-arachidonoyl phos- cation of albumin and Hsp70 as cytosolic anandamide-
phatidylethanolamine, in rat brain”. J. Neurosci. 17 (4): binding proteins”. Chemistry & Biology 16 (6): 624–632.
1226–42. PMID 9006968. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.004. PMID 19481477.
[18] Berger A et al. (May 2001). “Anandamide and diet: [25] http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2004/July/
Inclusion of dietary arachidonate and docosahexaenoate anandamide.asp
leads to increased brain levels of the corresponding N-
acylethanolamines in piglets”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 98 (11): 6402–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.101119098.
PMC 33480. PMID 11353819. |first3= missing |last3= 205.7 External links
in Authors list (help); |first4= missing |last4= in Authors
list (help); |first5= missing |last5= in Authors list (help); • Could anandamide be the missing link to “runner’s
|first6= missing |last6= in Authors list (help) high"? Accessed 2008-10-18
N-Arachidonoyl dopamine
206.2 References
[1] Ralevic V (July 2003). “Cannabinoid modulation of
peripheral autonomic and sensory neurotransmission”.
European Journal of Pharmacology 472 (1–2): 1–21.
doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01813-2. PMID 12860468.
274
Chapter 207
2-Arachidonoylglycerol
275
276 CHAPTER 207. 2-ARACHIDONOYLGLYCEROL
207.6.1 Notes [12] Savinainen, JR; Saario, SM; Laitinen, JT (2012). “The
serine hydrolases MAGL, ABHD6 and ABHD12 as
[1] Stella N, Schweitzer P, Piomelli D (August 1997). “A guardians of 2-arachidonoylglycerol signalling through
second endogenous cannabinoid that modulates long- cannabinoid receptors”. Acta physiologica (Oxford,
term potentiation”. Nature 388 (6644): 773–8. England) 204 (2): 267–76. doi:10.1111/j.1748-
doi:10.1038/42015. PMID 9285589. 1716.2011.02280.x. PMC 3320662. PMID 21418147.
[2] Sugiura T, Kodaka T, Nakane S, et al. (January 1999). [13] Kaczocha, M.; Glaser, S.T.; Deutsch, D.G. (2009).
“Evidence that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor is a 2- “Identification of intracellular carriers for the endo-
arachidonoylglycerol receptor. Structure-activity relation- cannabinoid anandamide”. Proceedings of the National
ship of 2-arachidonoylglycerol, ether-linked analogues, Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106
and related compounds”. The Journal of Biological Chem- (15): 6375–6380. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901515106. PMC
istry 274 (5): 2794–801. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.5.2794. 2669397. PMID 19307565.
PMID 9915812.
[14] Oddi, S.; Fezza, F.; Pasquariello, N.; d'Agostino, A.;
[3] Kondo S, Kondo H, Nakane S, et al. (June 1998). “2- Catanzaro, G.; De Simone, C.; Rapino, C.; Finazzi-
Arachidonoylglycerol, an endogenous cannabinoid recep- Agrò, A.; MacCarrone, M. (2009). “Molecular identi-
tor agonist: identification as one of the major species fication of albumin and Hsp70 as cytosolic anandamide-
of monoacylglycerols in various rat tissues, and evi- binding proteins”. Chemistry & Biology 16 (6): 624–632.
dence for its generation through Ca2+-dependent and - doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.004. PMID 19481477.
independent mechanisms”. FEBS Letters 429 (2): 152–6.
doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00581-X. PMID 9650580. [15] Köfalvi, Attila (2008). Cannabinoids and the Brain. New
York City: Axel Springer AG. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-387-
[4] Fride E, Bregman T, Kirkham TC. (April 2005). 74348-6. “2-Arachidonoylglycerol can be synthesized
“Endocannabinoids and food intake: newborn suckling from arachidonic acid-containing diacylglycerol derived
and appetite regulation in adulthood”. Experimental Bi- from increaded inositol phospholid metabolism by the ac-
ology and Medicine 230 (4): 225–234. PMID 15792943. tion of a diacylglycerol lipase. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol
can also be formed via other pathways such as the hydrol-
[5] Pizzorno, Lara; MDiv; MA; LMT. “New Developments
ysis of the diaclygly derived from PC and phosphatidic
in Cannabinoid-Based Medicine: An Interview with Dr.
acid by the action of a diacyglycerol lipase and the hy-
Raphael Mechoulam”. Longevity Medicine Review. Re-
drolysis of arachidonic acid-containing lysophosphatidic
trieved 2011-05-26.
acid by the action of a phosphatase. The relative impor-
[6] Sugiura T, Itoh K, Waku K, Hanahan DJ (1994) Pro- tance of these pathways may depend on the types of cells
ceedings of Japanese conference on the Biochemistry of and stimuli.”
Lipids, 36, 71-74 (in Japanese)
[7] Sugiura T, Kondo S, Sukagawa A, et al. (October 1995). 207.6.2 General references
“2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabi-
noid receptor ligand in brain”. Biochem. Biophys. Res. • Dinh TP, Carpenter D, Leslie FM, et al. (Au-
Commun. 215 (1): 89–97. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.2437. gust 2002). “Brain monoglyceride lipase partic-
PMID 7575630. Retrieved 2009-01-27.
ipating in endocannabinoid inactivation”. Pro-
[8] Mechoulam R, Ben-Shabat S, Hanuš L, et al. (June ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
1995). “Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, the United States of America 99 (16): 10819–
present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid re- 24. doi:10.1073/pnas.152334899. PMC 125056.
ceptors”. Biochemical pharmacology 50 (1): 83–90. PMID 12136125.
doi:10.1016/0006-2952(95)00109-D. PMID 7605349.
208.1 Discovery
208.3 Pharmacology
Lumír Hanuš, Saleh Abu-Lafi, Ester Fride, Aviva Breuer,
Zvi Vogel, Deborah E. Shalev, Irina Kustanovich, and 2-AGE binds with a Kᵢ of 21 nM to the CB1 receptor[1]
Raphael Mechoulam found the endogenous agonist of the and 480 nM to the CB2 receptor.[6] It shows agonistic
cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) in 2000. The dis- behaviour on both receptors and is a partial agonist for
covery was 100 gram of porcine brain, (approximately the TRPV1 channel.[7] After binding to CB2 receptors
a single brain) was added to a mixture of 200 mL of it inhibits adenylate cyclase and stimulates ERK-MAPK
chloroform and 200 mL of methanol and mixed in a and regulates calcium transients.[8] In comparison to 2-
laboratory blender for 2 minutes. 100 mL of Water was arachidonoyl glycerol, noladin is metabolically more sta-
then added, and the mixing process continued for an- ble resulting in a longer half-life.[9] It lowers Intraocular
other minute. After this, the mixture was filtered. Two pressure,[9] increases the uptake of GABA in the globus
layers then formed and the layer of water-methanol was pallidus of rats[10] and is neuroprotective by binding to
separated and evaporated when pressure was reduced. and activation of PPARα.[11]
Synaptosomal membranes were prepared from 250g of
the brains of Sabra male rats. A Hewlett Packard G
1800B GCD system that has a HP-5971 GC with electron 208.4 See also
ionization detector was used.[1]
• 2-Arachidonoylglycerol
208.2 Production
208.5 References
The production of the endocannabinoid is enhanced in
normal, but not in endothelium-denuded rat aorta on re- [1] Hanus, L.; Abu-Lafi, S.; Fride, E.; Breuer, A.; Vo-
acting with carbachol, an parasympathomimetic drug. It gel, Z.; Shalev, D.; Kustanovich, I.; Mechoulam, R.
potently reduces blood pressure in rats and may represent (2001). “2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether, an endogenous ag-
an endothelium-derived hypotension factor.[1] onist of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor”. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 98 (7): 3662–3665.
2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether’s structure can be deter- doi:10.1073/pnas.061029898. PMC 31108. PMID
mined by mass spectrometry and Rutherford backscatter- 11259648.
ing spectrometry. It was confirmed by comparison with a
synthetic sample of the endocannabinoid. It binds to the [2] “2-Arachidonyl Glycerol ether · Noladin; 2-AG ether
Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (Ki = 21.2 ± 0.5 nM), which (CAS 222723-55-9) || Cayman Chemical”. Cayman
Chemical. Retrieved 2011-05-29.
causes sedation, hypothermia, intestinal immobility, and
mild antinociception in mice.[1] The endocannabinoid ex- [3] Oka S, Tsuchie A, Tokumura A et al. (2003).
hibits Ki values of 21.2 nM and >3 µM at the Cannabi- “Ether-linked analogue of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (no-
noid receptor type 1 and the peripheral cannabinoid ladin ether) was not detected in the brains of various
277
278 CHAPTER 208. 2-ARACHIDONYL GLYCERYL ETHER
Oleamide
Synthetically produced oleamide has a variety of indus- [6] Raphael Mechoulam, Ester Fride, Lumír Ondřej Hanuš,
trial uses including as a slip agent, a lubricant, and a cor- Tzviel Sheskin, Tiziana Bisogno, Vincenzo Di Marzo,
rosion inhibitor.[8] Michael Bayewitch and Zvi Vogel (1997). “Anandamide
may mediate sleep induction”. Nature 389 (6646): 25–26.
Oleamide was originally characterized as an endogenous doi:10.1038/37891. PMID 9288961.
bioactive substance, isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid
of sleep deprived cats. It was characterised in 1995 by [7] Fedorova I, Hashimoto A, Fecik RA et al. (2001). “Be-
havioral evidence for the interaction of oleamide with
Benjamin Cravatt III and Richard Lerner at The Scripps
multiple neurotransmitter systems”. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
Research Institute in La Jolla, CA.[9] Ther. 299 (1): 332–42. PMID 11561096.
Oleamide was found by researchers to be leaking out of
[8] Surfactants : Westco Oleamide a Slip Agent In Polyethy-
polypropylene plastics used in laboratory experiments,
lene Films
affecting experimental results.[10] Since polypropylene is
used in a wide number of food containers such as those [9] Cravatt BF, et al. (June 1995). “Chemical characteriza-
for yogurt, the problem is being studied.[11] tion of a family of brain lipids that induce sleep”. Sci-
ence 268 (5216): 1506–9. doi:10.1126/science.7770779.
A chemical analysis of 44 products containing synthetic PMID 7770779.
cannabinoid drugs marketed as “herbal incense” revealed
oleamide in 7 of the products tested.[12] [10] McDonald, RG. et al. (2008). “Bioactive Contaminants
Leach from Disposable Laboratory Plasticware”. Science
322 (5903): 917. doi:10.1126/science.1162395. PMID
18988846.
209.1 See also
[11] Mittelstaedt, Martin (6 November 2008). “Researchers
• Anandamide Raise Alarm After Chemical Leak Found In Common
Plastic”. Globe and Mail. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
• Fatty acid amide hydrolase
[12] Uchiyama, Nahoko; Kikura-Hanajiri, Ruri; Ogata, Jun;
Goda, Yukihiro (2010). “Chemical analysis of syn-
• Virodhamine
thetic cannabinoids as designer drugs in herbal prod-
ucts”. Forensic Science International 198 (1–3): 31–8.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.004. PMID 20117892.
209.2 References
[1] Oleamide at chemicalland21.com
279
Chapter 210
RVD-Hpα
RVD-Hpα is an endogenous neuropeptide found in Journal of Biological Chemistry 287 (44): 36944–36967.
human and mammalian brain, which was originally doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.382481. PMC 3481297. PMID
proposed to act as a selective agonist for the CB1 22952224.
cannabinoid receptor. It is a 12-amino acid polypeptide
having the amino acid sequence Arg-Val-Asp-Pro-Val-
Asn-Phe-Lys-Leu-Leu-Ser-His and is an N-terminal ex-
tended form of hemopressin, a 9-AA polypeptide de-
rived from the α1 subunit of hemoglobin which has pre-
viously been shown to act as a CB1 inverse agonist.[1]
All three polypeptides have been isolated from vari-
ous mammalian species, with RVD-Hpα being one of
the more abundant neuropeptides expressed in mouse
brain, and these neuropeptides represent a new avenue for
cannabinoid research distinct from the previously known
endogenous lipid-derived cannabinoid agonists such as
anandamide.[2] Recently it was shown that RVD-Hpα
(also called Pepcan-12) is an potent negative allosteric
modulator at CB1 receptors, together with other newly
described N-terminally extended peptides (pepcans) [3]
210.1 References
[1] Heimann, A.; Gomes, I.; Dale, C.; Pagano, R.;
Gupta, A.; De Souza, L.; Luchessi, A.; Castro, L.;
Giorgi, R.; Rioli, V.; Ferro, E. S.; Devi, L. A.
(2007). “Hemopressin is an inverse agonist of CB1
cannabinoid receptors”. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104
(51): 20588–20593. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10420588H.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0706980105. PMC 2154475. PMID
18077343.
280
Chapter 211
Virodhamine
211.2 References
[1] Porter AC, Sauer JM, Knierman MD et al. (2002).
“Characterization of a novel endocannabinoid, virod-
hamine, with antagonist activity at the CB1 recep-
tor”. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 301 (3): 1020–
4. doi:10.1124/jpet.301.3.1020. PMID 12023533. Re-
trieved 2007-10-31.
281
Chapter 212
HU-320
• HU-331
212.2 References
[1] Sumariwalla PF, et al. (2004). “A novel synthetic,
nonpsychoactive cannabinoid acid (HU-320) with an-
tiinflammatory properties in murine collagen-induced
arthritis”. Arthritis Rheum. 50 (3): 985–998.
doi:10.1002/art.20050. PMID 15022343.
282
Chapter 213
HU-336
• HU-345
213.2 References
[1] Natalya M. Kogan, et al. (2006). “A Cannabinoid
Quinone Inhibits Angiogenesis by Targeting Vascular En-
dothelial Cells”. Molecular Pharmacology 70 (1): 51–59.
doi:10.1124/mol.105.021089. PMID 16571653.
283
Chapter 214
HU-345
214.2 References
[1] Natalya M. Kogan, et al. (2006). “A Cannabinoid
Quinone Inhibits Angiogenesis by Targeting Vascular En-
dothelial Cells”. Molecular Pharmacology 70 (1): 51–59.
doi:10.1124/mol.105.021089. PMID 16571653.
284
Chapter 215
Raphael Mechoulam
215.1 Biography
215.3 References
Raphael Mechoulam was born in Sofia, Bulgaria on
November 5, 1930. His father was a physician and head [1] http://www.nndb.com/people/699/000210069/
of a local hospital, while his mother “who had studied in [2] Conversation with Raphael Mechoulam, Addiction (Wi-
Berlin, enjoyed the life of a well-to-do Jewish family”. ley) 102 (6), 2007: 887–893, doi:10.1111/j.1360-
He attended an “American Grade School” until his par- 0443.2007.01795.x, PMID 17523982
ents were forced to leave their hometown because of anti-
semitic laws and his father was subsequently sent to a con- [3] Michael Denman (2007), “MECHOULAM,
centration camp, from which he survived. After the com- RAPHAEL”, Encyclopaedia Judaica 13 (2nd ed.),
Thomson Gale, pp. 711–712
munist takeover of hitherto pro-German Bulgaria in 1944
he studied chemical engineering, which he “disliked.” In
1949 his family immigrated to Israel where he later stud-
ied chemistry. He gained his first research experience in 215.4 Podcasts
the Israeli Army working on insecticides.[2]
He received his M.Sc. in biochemistry from the He- • A podcast (open access) of an interview with
brew University of Jerusalem (1952), and his Ph.D. at the Raphael Mechoulam, recorded by Steve Alexander
Weizmann Institute, Reḥovot (1958), with a thesis on the for the British Journal of Pharmacology on the oc-
chemistry of steroids. After postdoctoral studies at the casion of his 80th Birthday in November 2010.
Rockefeller Institute, New York (1959–60), he was on
the scientific staff of the Weizmann Institute (1960–65),
before moving to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
where he became professor (1972) and Lionel Jacobson
Professor of Medicinal Chemistry from 1975. He was
rector (1979–82) and pro-rector (1983–85). In 1994 he
was elected a member of the Israel Academy of Sciences.
His honors include the Kolthof Prize in chemistry from
the Haifa Technion (1994) and the Israel Prize in chem-
istry (2000).[3]
285
Chapter 216
John W. Huffman
286
Chapter 217
JWH-007
• JWH-015
• JWH-018
• JWH-019
• JWH-073
287
Chapter 218
Naphthoylindole
288
218.6. SYNTHESIS 289
[7] “Clemson University :: Department of Chemistry”. [22] See Arntson et al. (2013) http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/
Clemson.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-23. content/37/5/284.abstract, https://www.caymanchem.
com/app/template/Product.vm/catalog/580210;
[8] “Drugs Forum”. Drugs Forum. Retrieved 2010-08-23. http://www.randoxtoxicology.com/Products/Elisa-p-50,
[9] Gefährlicher Kick mit Spice (German) http://tulipbiolabs.com/our-product-areas/
synthetic-cannabinoids and others.
[10] Erstmals Bestandteile der Modedroge “Spice”
[23] Möller I, et al. Screening for the synthetic cannabinoid
nachgewiesen (German)
JWH-018 and its major metabolites in human doping con-
[11] Spice enthält chemischen Wirkstoff (German) trols. Drug Test. Anal. Sep 24, 2010. [Epub ahead of
print]
[12] Lindigkeit R, Boehme A, Eiserloh I, Luebbecke M, Wig-
germann M, Ernst L, Beuerle T (30 October 2009). [24] Teske J, et al. Sensitive and rapid quantification
“Spice: A never ending story?". Forensic Science Inter- of the cannabinoid receptor agonist naphthalen-1-yl-(1-
national (Forensic Science International) 191 (1): 58–63. pentylindol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-018) in human serum
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.008. PMID 19589652. by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J
Chrom. B 878: 2659-2663, 2010.
[13] T. Kraemer, et al. Studies on the metabolism of JWH-
018 and of a homologue of CP 47,497, pharmacolog- [25] Auwärter V, Dresen S, Weinmann W, Müller M, Pütz
ically active ingredients of different misused incense M, Ferreirós N (2009). "'Spice' and other herbal blends:
(“Spice”) using GC-MS and LC-MSn techniques (In- harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs?". Jour-
stitute of Legal Medicine, Saarland University, 66421 nal of mass spectrometry : JMS 44 (5): 832–837.
Homburg, Germany http://www.gtfch.org/cms/images/ doi:10.1002/jms.1558. PMID 19189348. Free version
stories/media/tk/tk76_2/abstractsvortraege.pdf
[26] Zimmermann US, Winkelmann PR, Pilhatsch M, Nees
[14] Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G (July 2010). JA, Spanagel R, Schulz K (2009). “Withdrawal phe-
“Detection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture nomena and dependence syndrome after the consumption
post-administration urine”. Forensic Science International of “spice gold"". Deutsches Arzteblatt international 106
200 (1–3): 141–7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.003. (27): 464–467. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0464. PMC
PMID 20430547. 2719097. PMID 19652769.
[15] wyff4.com, Coroner: Synthetic Pot Killed College Ath- [27] Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G (2010). “De-
lete, posted 10/14/11, accessed 12/22/11, http://www. tection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture post-
wyff4.com/news/29497549/detail.html, administration urine”. Forensic Science International 200
(1–3): 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.003.
[16] Mayo, Nikie, “City Releases Email in Lamar Jacks Case”, PMID 20430547.
independentmail.com, posted Dec 16, 2011, accessed
12/22/11, http://www.independentmail.com/news/2011/ [28] Beuck S, Möller I, Thomas A, Klose A, Schlörer
dec/16/city-releases-email-lamar-jack-case/ N, Schänzer W, Thevis M (August 2011). “Struc-
ture characterisation of urinary metabolites of the
[17] Laaris N, Good CH, Lupica CR (July–August 2010). cannabimimetic JWH-018 using chemically synthesised
"Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol is a full agonist at CB1 re- reference material for the support of LC-MS/MS-based
ceptors on GABA neuron axon terminals in the hip- drug testing”. Anal Bioanal Chem 401 (2): 493–505.
pocampus”. Neuropharmacology 59 (1–2): 121–127. doi:10.1007/s00216-011-4931-5. PMID 21455647.
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.04.013. PMC 2882293.
PMID 20417220. [29] Moran CL, Le VH, Chimalakonda KC, Smedley AL,
Lackey FD, Owen SN, Kennedy PD, Endres GW, Ciske
[18] Hoffman AF, Lupica CR (2000-04-01). “Mechanisms of FL, Kramer JB, Kornilov AM, Bratton LD, Dobrowolski
cannabinoid inhibition of GABAA synaptic transmission PJ, Wessinger WD, Fantegrossi WE, Prather PL, James
in the hippocampus”. The Journal of Neuroscience 20 (7): LP, Radominska-Pandya A, Moran JH (June 2011).
2470–2479. ISSN 0270-6474. PMID 10729327. Re- “Quantitative measurement of JWH-018 and JWH-073
trieved 2011-07-26. metabolites excreted in human urine”. Anal. Chem.
83 (11): 4228–36. doi:10.1021/ac2005636. PMID
[19] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Ad- 21506519.
diction. “Understanding the Spice Phenomenon.” 2009.
ISBN 978-92-9168-411-3. [30] Logan BK, et al. Identification of primary JWH-
018 and JWH-073 metabolites in human urine.
[20] Every-Palmer, S. Synthetic cannabinoid use and psy- NMS Labs Technical Bulletin, May 25, 2011.
chosis: an explorative study. Journal of Drug and Alcohol http://toxwiki.wikispaces.com/file/view/JWH_
Dependence 2011. [Epub ahead of print]. metabolites_Technical_Bulletin_Final_v1.1.pdf
[21] Every-Palmer S (2010). “WARNING: LEGAL SYN- [31] R. Baselt, Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in
THETIC CANNABINOID-RECEPTOR AGONISTS Man, 10th edition, Biomedical Publications, Seal Beach,
SUCH AS JWH-018 MAY PRECIPITATE PSYCHOSIS CA, 2014, p. 1863.
IN VULNERABLE INDIVIDUALS”. Addiction 105:
1859–1860. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03119.x. [32] <http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/
PMID 20840203. CURRENT/D/DrugsMisuseR87.pdf>
218.9. EXTERNAL LINKS 291
[36] http://www.afssaps.fr/var/afssaps_site/storage/original/
application/d23d05edc58479d91c803b496017f073.pdf
[39] http://www.politicheantidroga.it/
comunicazione/comunicati/2010/luglio/spice,
-n-joy-e-mefedrone-da-oggi-stupefacenti.aspx (Italian)
[40] https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/
synthetic-cannabinoids/what-they-are
[41] http://www.lovdata.no/ltavd1/filer/sf-20111221-1465.
html
[43] http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/12102/a/130038
(Swedish)
[50] <http://www.antinarcotics.psd.gov.jo>
JWH-019
219.1.2 Sweden [4] Ashton JC, Wright JL, McPartland JM, Tyndall JD
(2008). “Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor ligand
JWH-019 is illegal in Sweden specificity and the development of CB2-selective ago-
nists”. Current Medicinal Chemistry 15 (14): 1428–43.
doi:10.2174/092986708784567716. PMID 18537620.
219.1.3 UK [5] http://crimlaw.blogspot.com/2011/04/
no-more-synthetic-cannabinoid.html
JWH-019 is Class B in the United Kingdom.
219.1.4 USA
JWH-019 is not controlled federally in the United States,
however if intended for human consumption, possession
or sales could possibly be prosecuted under the Federal
Analog Act.
JWH-019 is illegal in Virginia.[5]
292
Chapter 220
JWH-030
220.2 References
[1] Lainton JAH, Huffman JW, Martin BR, Compton DR.
Tetrahedron Letters. 1995; 36:1401.
293
Chapter 221
JWH-047
• JWH-018
• JWH-019
• JWH-073
221.2 References
[1] Aung MM, Griffin G, Huffman JW, Wu M-J, Keel
C, Yang B, Showalter VM, Abood ME, Martin BR
(2000). “Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of
cannabimimetic indoles upon CB1 and CB2 receptor
binding”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 60 (2): 133–40.
doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00152-0. PMID 10940540.
294
Chapter 222
JWH-048
• JWH-018
• JWH-019
• JWH-073
222.2 References
[1] Aung MM, Griffin G, Huffman JW, Wu M-J, Keel
C, Yang B, Showalter VM, Abood ME, Martin BR
(2000). “Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of
cannabimimetic indoles upon CB1 and CB2 receptor
binding”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 60 (2): 133–40.
doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00152-0. PMID 10940540.
295
Chapter 223
JWH-073
223.1 Pharmacology
JWH-073 has been shown to produce behavioral effects
very similar to THC in animals.[5]
Its effects are produced by binding and acting as an ago-
4'-Methyl-JWH-073
nist to the CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. The CB1
receptor is found in the brain. JWH-073 bind to CB1 with
a higher affinity than THC, suggesting that taking more
too soon after the initial dose could lead to diminished 223.3 Legal status
effects. CB2 is found outside the brain, mostly in the im-
mune system. The binding with CB2 receptors has been
shown to be similar between JWH-073 and THC.[5] 223.3.1 United States
A search in the literature yielded no published studies of See also: JWH-018
the effects of JWH-073 in humans, but these studies in The US DEA temporarily declared JWH-073 a schedule
animals suggest with high probability that JWH-073 pro- I controlled substance on 1 March 2011 through 76 FR
duces effects very similar to those of THC in humans.[5] 11075, and permanently instated the same schedule on
9 July 2012 in the Section 1152 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation Act.[7]
223.2 Derivatives
The 4'-methyl derivative of JWH-073 has been encoun- 223.3.2 Australia
tered as an ingredient of synthetic cannabis blends in Ger-
many and several other European countries since 2010.[6] See also: JWH-018
The 4'-methoxy derivative JWH-080 is also known to be a
potent cannabinoid agonist and has been banned in some On 8 July 2011 the AUS government banned the sale of
countries, though it is unclear if it has also been used in JWH-073.[8]
296
223.5. REFERENCES 297
[9] https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/
synthetic-cannabinoids/what-they-are
1 g of JWH-073
223.5 References
[1] http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=201101&from=off
[5] http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugs_concern/
spice/spice_jwh073.html
[8] http://www.tga.gov.au/pdf/scheduling/
scheduling-decisions-1107-final.pdf
Chapter 224
JWH-081
• JWH-098
• JWH-164
• JWH-198
• JWH-210
224.2 References
[1] “Ustawa z dnia 15 kwietnia 2011 r. o zmianie ustawy
o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii (Dz.U. 2011 nr 105 poz.
614)". Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych. Retrieved
12 June 2011.
[2] Aung MM, et al. Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length
of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB1 and CB2 receptor
binding. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 60:133-
140.
298
Chapter 225
JWH-098
• JWH-081
225.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, et al. Structure–activity relationships for 1-
alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabinoid CB1 and
CB2 receptors: steric and electronic effects of naphthoyl
substituents. New highly selective CB2 receptor agonists.
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2005; 13:89-112.
PMID 15582455
299
Chapter 226
JWH-116
• JWH-081
226.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Mabon R, Wu M-J, Lu J, Hart R, Hurst DP,
Reggio PH, Wiley JL, Martin BR (2003). “3-Indolyl-1-
naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide
evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB1
cannabinoid receptor”. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (4): 539–
549. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00451-0.
300
Chapter 227
JWH-147
227.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW, Isherwood ML, Wiley JL,
Martin BR. 1-Alkyl-2-aryl-4-(1-naphthoyl)pyrroles: New
high affinity ligands for the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 re-
ceptors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2006;
16:5432-5435.
301
Chapter 228
JWH-164
228.1 References
[1] Huffman JW, et al. Structure–activity relationships for 1-
alkyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles at the cannabinoid CB1 and
CB2 receptors: steric and electronic effects of naphthoyl
substituents. New highly selective CB2 receptor agonists.
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2005; 13:89-112.
PMID 15582455
302
Chapter 229
Phenylacetylindole
JWH-167 (1-pentyl-3-(phenylacetyl)indole) is a
synthetic cannabinoid from the phenylacetylindole
family, which acts as a cannabinoid agonist with about
1.75x selectivity for CB1 with a Kᵢ of 90nM ± 17 and
159nM ± 14 at CB2 . Similar to the related 2'-methoxy
compound JWH-250, and the 2'-chloro compound
JWH-203, JWH-167 has a phenylacetyl group in place
of the naphthoyl ring used in most aminoalkylindole
cannabinoid compounds.[1][2]
229.1 References
[1] Huffman, JW, Szklennik, PV, Almond, A, Bushell,
K, Selley, DE, He, H, Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL,
Martin, BR (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles,
a new class of cannabimimetic indoles”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (18): 4110–3.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID 16005223.
303
Chapter 230
JWH-175
• JWH-185
230.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW. Recent Developments in
the Medicinal Chemistry of Cannabimimetic Indoles,
Pyrroles and Indenes. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2005;
12: 1395-1411.
304
Chapter 231
JWH-184
• JWH-122
• JWH-185
231.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Mabon R, Wu M-J, Lu J, Hart R, Hurst DP,
Reggio PH, Wiley JL, Martin BR (2003). “3-Indolyl-1-
naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide
evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB1
cannabinoid receptor”. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (4): 539–
549. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00451-0.
305
Chapter 232
JWH-185
• JWH-184
232.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Mabon R, Wu M-J, Lu J, Hart R, Hurst DP,
Reggio PH, Wiley JL, Martin BR (2003). “3-Indolyl-1-
naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide
evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB1
cannabinoid receptor”. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (4): 539–
549. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00451-0.
306
Chapter 233
JWH-196
233.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Mabon R, Wu M-J, Lu J, Hart R, Hurst DP,
Reggio PH, Wiley JL, Martin BR (2003). “3-Indolyl-1-
naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide
evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB1
cannabinoid receptor”. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (4): 539–
549. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00451-0.
307
Chapter 234
JWH-203
JWH-203 (1-pentyl-3-(2-chlorophenylacetyl)indole)
is an analgesic chemical from the phenylacetylindole
family that acts as a cannabinoid agonist with ap-
proximately equal affinity at both the CB1 and CB2
receptors, having a Kᵢ of 8.0nM at CB1 and 7.0nM
at CB2 . It was originally discovered by, and named
after, Dr. John W. Huffman, but has subsequently
been sold without his permission as an ingredient of
synthetic cannabis smoking blends.[2] Similar to the
related 2'-methoxy compound JWH-250, the 2'-bromo
compound JWH-249, and the 2'-methyl compound
JWH-251, JWH-203 has a phenylacetyl group in place
of the naphthoyl ring used in most aminoalkylindole
cannabinoid compounds, and has the strongest in vitro
binding affinity for the cannabinoid receptors of any
compound in the phenylacetyl group.[3][4][5]
Unexpectedly despite its weaker CB1 Kᵢ in vitro, the 2-
methylindole derivative JWH-204 is actually more potent
than JWH-203 in animal tests for cannabinoid activity,
though it is still weaker than JWH-249.[6]
[1] = WDU20111050614 “Ustawa z dnia 15 kwietnia 2011 r. [5] Bononi M, Belgi P, Tateo F (2011). “Analytical data for
o zmianie ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii ( Dz.U. identification of the Cannabimimetic Phenylacetylindole
2011 nr 105 poz. 614 )". Internetowy System Aktów JWH-203”. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 35 (6): 360–
Prawnych. Retrieved 17 June 2011. 3. doi:10.1093/anatox/35.6.360. PMID 21740693.
[2] “Analytical data for identification of the Cannabimimetic [6] “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles and JWH-018 share in
Phenylacetylindole JWH-203”. J Anal Toxicol 35 (6): vivo cannabinoid profiles in mice”. Drug Alcohol Depend.
360–3. July 2011. doi:10.1093/anatox/35.6.360. PMID November 2011. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.001.
21740693. PMID 22127210.
308
Chapter 235
JWH-210
• JWH-193
• JWH-398
235.2 References
[1] “Ustawa z dnia 15 kwietnia 2011 r. o zmianie ustawy o
przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii ( Dz.U. 2011 nr 105 poz.
614 )". Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych. Retrieved
12 June 2011.
309
Chapter 236
JWH-249
JWH-249 (1-pentyl-3-(2-bromophenylacetyl)indole)
is a synthetic cannabinoid from the phenylacetylindole
family, which acts as a cannabinoid agonist with about
2.4x selectivity for CB1 with a Kᵢ of 8.4nM ± 1.8 and
20nM ± 2 at CB2 . Similar to the related 2'-methoxy
compound JWH-250, the 2'-chloro compound JWH-203,
and the 2'-methyl compound JWH-251, JWH-249 has a
phenylacetyl group in place of the naphthoyl ring used in
most aminoalkylindole cannabinoid compounds. [1][2]
236.2 References
[1] Huffman, JW, Szklennik, PV, Almond, A, Bushell,
K, Selley, DE, He, H, Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL,
Martin, BR (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles,
a new class of cannabimimetic indoles”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (18): 4110–3.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID 16005223.
310
Chapter 237
JWH-250
237.1 History
JWH-250 was discovered by, and named after the re-
searcher Dr. John W. Huffman. He created JWH-
250 and a number of other compounds to research the
structure and function of the endocannabinoid system of
mammals. Samples of JWH-250 were first identified in
May 2009 by the German Federal Criminal Police, as
an ingredient in new generation "herbal smoking blends"
that had been released since the banning of the original
ingredients (C8)-CP 47,497 and JWH-018.[5] An ELISA
immunoassay technique for detecting JWH-250 in urine
has been reported.[6]
237.2 References
[1] Legal article in Latvian (www.likumi.lv)
[2] Huffman, JW, et al. (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-
phenylacetylindoles, a new class of cannabimimetic
indoles”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15
(18): 4110–3. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID
16005223.
[3] Manera, C; Tuccinardi, T; Martinelli, A (2008). “In-
doles and related compounds as cannabinoid ligands”.
Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry 8 (4): 370–87.
doi:10.2174/138955708783955935. PMID 18473928.
[4] The Cannabinoid Receptors. Edited by Patricia H Reggio.
Humana Press 2009. ISBN 978-1-58829-712-9
311
Chapter 238
JWH-251
JWH-251 (1-pentyl-3-(2-methylphenylacetyl)indole)
is a synthetic cannabinoid from the phenylacetylindole
family, which acts as a cannabinoid agonist with about
5x selectivity for CB1 with a Kᵢ of 29nM and 146nM
at CB2 . Similar to the related 2'-methoxy com-
pound JWH-250, the 2'-chloro compound JWH-203,
and the 2'-bromo compound JWH-249, JWH-251 has a
phenylacetyl group in place of the naphthoyl ring used in
most aminoalkylindole cannabinoid compounds. [1][2]
238.1 References
[1] Huffman, JW, Szklennik, PV, Almond, A, Bushell,
K, Selley, DE, He, H, Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL,
Martin, BR (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles,
a new class of cannabimimetic indoles”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (18): 4110–3.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID 16005223.
312
Chapter 239
JWH-302
JWH-302 or (1-pentyl-3-(3-
methoxyphenylacetyl)indole) is an analgesic chemical
from the phenylacetylindole family, which acts as a
cannabinoid agonist with moderate affinity at both the
CB1 and CB2 receptors. It is a positional isomer of the
more common drug JWH-250, though it is slightly less
potent with a Kᵢ of 17nM at CB1 , compared to 11nM
for JWH-250.[1][2] Because of their identical molecular
weight and similar fragmentation patterns, JWH-302 and
JWH-250 can be very difficult to distinguish by GC-MS
testing.[3]
239.1 References
[1] Huffman, JW. et al. (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-
phenylacetylindoles, a new class of cannabimimetic
indoles”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15
(18): 4110–3. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID
16005223.
313
Chapter 240
JWH-307
240.2 References
[1] Huffman JW, Padgett LW, Isherwood ML, Wiley JL,
Martin BR. 1-Alkyl-2-aryl-4-(1-naphthoyl)pyrroles: New
high affinity ligands for the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 re-
ceptors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2006;
16:5432-5435.
314
Chapter 241
JWH-398
241.2 References
[1]
315
Chapter 242
JWH-424
• JWH-398
242.2 References
[1] Valerie Smith, John Huffman, Jenny Wiley and
Billy Martin. EFFECTS OF HALOGEN SUB-
STITUENTS UPON CB1 AND CB2 RECEPTOR
AFFINITIES IN THE SERIES OF N-ALKYL-3-(8-
HALO-1-NAPTHOYL)INDOLES. (2007) 17th Annual
Symposium on the Cannabinoids, Burlington, Vermont,
International Cannabinoid Research Society, Page 72.
316
Chapter 243
Naphthoylindole
317
318 CHAPTER 243. NAPHTHOYLINDOLE
[7] “Clemson University :: Department of Chemistry”. [22] See Arntson et al. (2013) http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/
Clemson.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-23. content/37/5/284.abstract, https://www.caymanchem.
com/app/template/Product.vm/catalog/580210;
[8] “Drugs Forum”. Drugs Forum. Retrieved 2010-08-23. http://www.randoxtoxicology.com/Products/Elisa-p-50,
[9] Gefährlicher Kick mit Spice (German) http://tulipbiolabs.com/our-product-areas/
synthetic-cannabinoids and others.
[10] Erstmals Bestandteile der Modedroge “Spice”
[23] Möller I, et al. Screening for the synthetic cannabinoid
nachgewiesen (German)
JWH-018 and its major metabolites in human doping con-
[11] Spice enthält chemischen Wirkstoff (German) trols. Drug Test. Anal. Sep 24, 2010. [Epub ahead of
print]
[12] Lindigkeit R, Boehme A, Eiserloh I, Luebbecke M, Wig-
germann M, Ernst L, Beuerle T (30 October 2009). [24] Teske J, et al. Sensitive and rapid quantification
“Spice: A never ending story?". Forensic Science Inter- of the cannabinoid receptor agonist naphthalen-1-yl-(1-
national (Forensic Science International) 191 (1): 58–63. pentylindol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-018) in human serum
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.008. PMID 19589652. by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J
Chrom. B 878: 2659-2663, 2010.
[13] T. Kraemer, et al. Studies on the metabolism of JWH-
018 and of a homologue of CP 47,497, pharmacolog- [25] Auwärter V, Dresen S, Weinmann W, Müller M, Pütz
ically active ingredients of different misused incense M, Ferreirós N (2009). "'Spice' and other herbal blends:
(“Spice”) using GC-MS and LC-MSn techniques (In- harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs?". Jour-
stitute of Legal Medicine, Saarland University, 66421 nal of mass spectrometry : JMS 44 (5): 832–837.
Homburg, Germany http://www.gtfch.org/cms/images/ doi:10.1002/jms.1558. PMID 19189348. Free version
stories/media/tk/tk76_2/abstractsvortraege.pdf
[26] Zimmermann US, Winkelmann PR, Pilhatsch M, Nees
[14] Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G (July 2010). JA, Spanagel R, Schulz K (2009). “Withdrawal phe-
“Detection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture nomena and dependence syndrome after the consumption
post-administration urine”. Forensic Science International of “spice gold"". Deutsches Arzteblatt international 106
200 (1–3): 141–7. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.003. (27): 464–467. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0464. PMC
PMID 20430547. 2719097. PMID 19652769.
[15] wyff4.com, Coroner: Synthetic Pot Killed College Ath- [27] Sobolevsky T, Prasolov I, Rodchenkov G (2010). “De-
lete, posted 10/14/11, accessed 12/22/11, http://www. tection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture post-
wyff4.com/news/29497549/detail.html, administration urine”. Forensic Science International 200
(1–3): 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.003.
[16] Mayo, Nikie, “City Releases Email in Lamar Jacks Case”, PMID 20430547.
independentmail.com, posted Dec 16, 2011, accessed
12/22/11, http://www.independentmail.com/news/2011/ [28] Beuck S, Möller I, Thomas A, Klose A, Schlörer
dec/16/city-releases-email-lamar-jack-case/ N, Schänzer W, Thevis M (August 2011). “Struc-
ture characterisation of urinary metabolites of the
[17] Laaris N, Good CH, Lupica CR (July–August 2010). cannabimimetic JWH-018 using chemically synthesised
"Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol is a full agonist at CB1 re- reference material for the support of LC-MS/MS-based
ceptors on GABA neuron axon terminals in the hip- drug testing”. Anal Bioanal Chem 401 (2): 493–505.
pocampus”. Neuropharmacology 59 (1–2): 121–127. doi:10.1007/s00216-011-4931-5. PMID 21455647.
doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.04.013. PMC 2882293.
PMID 20417220. [29] Moran CL, Le VH, Chimalakonda KC, Smedley AL,
Lackey FD, Owen SN, Kennedy PD, Endres GW, Ciske
[18] Hoffman AF, Lupica CR (2000-04-01). “Mechanisms of FL, Kramer JB, Kornilov AM, Bratton LD, Dobrowolski
cannabinoid inhibition of GABAA synaptic transmission PJ, Wessinger WD, Fantegrossi WE, Prather PL, James
in the hippocampus”. The Journal of Neuroscience 20 (7): LP, Radominska-Pandya A, Moran JH (June 2011).
2470–2479. ISSN 0270-6474. PMID 10729327. Re- “Quantitative measurement of JWH-018 and JWH-073
trieved 2011-07-26. metabolites excreted in human urine”. Anal. Chem.
83 (11): 4228–36. doi:10.1021/ac2005636. PMID
[19] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Ad- 21506519.
diction. “Understanding the Spice Phenomenon.” 2009.
ISBN 978-92-9168-411-3. [30] Logan BK, et al. Identification of primary JWH-
018 and JWH-073 metabolites in human urine.
[20] Every-Palmer, S. Synthetic cannabinoid use and psy- NMS Labs Technical Bulletin, May 25, 2011.
chosis: an explorative study. Journal of Drug and Alcohol http://toxwiki.wikispaces.com/file/view/JWH_
Dependence 2011. [Epub ahead of print]. metabolites_Technical_Bulletin_Final_v1.1.pdf
[21] Every-Palmer S (2010). “WARNING: LEGAL SYN- [31] R. Baselt, Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in
THETIC CANNABINOID-RECEPTOR AGONISTS Man, 10th edition, Biomedical Publications, Seal Beach,
SUCH AS JWH-018 MAY PRECIPITATE PSYCHOSIS CA, 2014, p. 1863.
IN VULNERABLE INDIVIDUALS”. Addiction 105:
1859–1860. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03119.x. [32] <http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/
PMID 20840203. CURRENT/D/DrugsMisuseR87.pdf>
320 CHAPTER 243. NAPHTHOYLINDOLE
[36] http://www.afssaps.fr/var/afssaps_site/storage/original/
application/d23d05edc58479d91c803b496017f073.pdf
[39] http://www.politicheantidroga.it/
comunicazione/comunicati/2010/luglio/spice,
-n-joy-e-mefedrone-da-oggi-stupefacenti.aspx (Italian)
[40] https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/
synthetic-cannabinoids/what-they-are
[41] http://www.lovdata.no/ltavd1/filer/sf-20111221-1465.
html
[43] http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/12102/a/130038
(Swedish)
[50] <http://www.antinarcotics.psd.gov.jo>
Phenylacetylindole
JWH-167 (1-pentyl-3-(phenylacetyl)indole) is a
synthetic cannabinoid from the phenylacetylindole
family, which acts as a cannabinoid agonist with about
1.75x selectivity for CB1 with a Kᵢ of 90nM ± 17 and
159nM ± 14 at CB2 . Similar to the related 2'-methoxy
compound JWH-250, and the 2'-chloro compound
JWH-203, JWH-167 has a phenylacetyl group in place
of the naphthoyl ring used in most aminoalkylindole
cannabinoid compounds.[1][2]
244.1 References
[1] Huffman, JW, Szklennik, PV, Almond, A, Bushell,
K, Selley, DE, He, H, Cassidy, MP, Wiley, JL,
Martin, BR (2005). “1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles,
a new class of cannabimimetic indoles”. Bioor-
ganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (18): 4110–3.
doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.06.008. PMID 16005223.
321
Chapter 245
RCS-8
RCS-8, or 1-(2-cyclohexylethyl)−3-(2-
methoxyphenylacetyl)indole, is a synthetic cannabinoid
also known as SR-18 or BTM-8 that has been found as
an ingredient of “herbal” synthetic cannabis blends. It
can be described as an analogue of JWH-250 with the
1-pentyl group replaced by 1-(2-cyclohexylethyl), and
can be expected to be less potent than JWH-250 (cf.
JWH-007 and its cyclohexylethyl analogue).[1] Despite
not having been reported in the scientific or patent
literature as yet, reputed recreational use of RCS-8 in the
United States has led to it being specifically listed in a
proposed 2011 amendment to the Controlled Substances
Act, aiming to add a number of synthetic drugs into
Schedule I.[2]
• JWH-250
• RCS-4
245.2 References
[1] Huffman, J. W.; Dai, D.; Martin, B. R.; Compton,
D. R. (1994). “Design, Synthesis and Pharmacology
of Cannabimimetic Indoles”. Bioorganic & Medici-
nal Chemistry Letters 4 (4): 563. doi:10.1016/S0960-
894X(01)80155-4.
322
Chapter 246
246.1 References
[1] Daniel Brandenburg; Richard Wernick (July 1986).
“Intravenous Marijuana Syndrome”. wjm 145 (1): 94–96.
PMC 1306836. PMID 3489321. Retrieved 2008-06-21.
323
Chapter 247
Mellow Yellow is the oldest cannabis coffee shop in 247.3 External links
Amsterdam. The coffee shop was founded in 1972 by
Wernard Bruinin in Weesperzijde, Amsterdam, on the • Mellow Yellow Lounge
premises of a former bakery. The shop is named after
"Mellow Yellow", a song by Donovan which describes the • Stichting Mediwiet
singer trying to become intoxicated through smoking the
peel of banana.[1]
The intent of the shop is to sell cannabis, despite this be-
ing illegal at the time of its creation.[1] Sales were origi-
nally disguised by drug dealers seated at the bar posing as
customers. Mellow Yellow was unsuccessfully raided by
police several times. Unpackaged cannabis, bought from
wholesalers including drug lord Klaas Bruinsma, was hid-
den behind secret doors and shutters.
In 1975, the concept was adopted by a shop named Russia
situated on the same street as Mellow Yellow and was fol-
lowed by another coffee shop called The Bulldog. Now
there are 223[2] such coffee shops in Amsterdam.
Bruining also runs Stichting Mediwiet (Medi Cannabis
Foundation), a group that supports the legalization of
growing marijuana for medicinal uses.
247.1 Citations
247.2 References
324
Chapter 248
The Night Train Drug Seizure was a 1978 seizure of 54 • List of United States Coast Guard cutters
tons of marijuana by the United States Coast Guard off
the southeastern coast of Florida which marked the be- • List of United States Coast Guard stations
ginning of Operation Stopgap, a United States federal law • Maritime Law Enforcement Academy
enforcement inter-agency drug interdiction operation fo-
cusing on interdicting drugs from Colombian cartels and • MARSEC
other illicit Central and South American drug sources.[1]
The Night Train seizure was the largest single drug seizure • National Data Buoy Center
in history at the time it occurred, and it remains one of the • National Ice Center
largest marijuana seizures made in the territorial waters
of the United States.[2] • Patrol Forces Southwest Asia
Operation Stopgap was one of the first inter-agency law • United States Coast Guard Legal Division
enforcement efforts focused on the interdiction of illegal
drugs from Central and South America, and it featured • United States Coast Guard officer rank insignia
personnel of the Coast Guard, DEA and US Federal Mar-
shals Service working together,[3] as well as the resources • United States Coast Guard Research & Develop-
of the Intelligence Section of the Drug Enforcement Ad- ment Center
ministration and Coast Guard Intelligence (CGI).[4]
The Night Train was a 189 foot coastal cargo vessel that 248.2 References
had become legendary in the law enforcement commu-
nity and smuggling circles due to its repeated ability to
[1] Name Of Pot-Laden Ship Sounded Familiar To Coast
elude US law enforcement for almost two years before
Guard Miami News, December 11, 1977
they were finally captured off of West Palm Beach as the
first seizure of Stopgap. Operation Stopgap was but the [2] Marijuana Seizure Was Largest Haul On Record Lakeland
first of a number of highly successful inter-agency intel- (Florida) Ledger, April 20, 1978
ligence and interdiction operations[5] that led to a large
[3] “The Battle Against Drugs Takes to the Seas: High Seas
number of successful seizures and prosecutions in the late
Drama When the Night Train was Seized by the Coast
1970s and early 1980s, garnering the U.S. Coast Guard Guard.” U.S. News and World Report LXXXIV (Mar 27,
considerable press coverage during this period as seizure 1978), pp. 69–71.
records continued to be broken.[6] Stopgap was also one
of the earliest interdiction operations to effectively use [4] DEA and Coast Guard Could Almost Track Drug Ship By
satellite technology in the pursuit and interdiction of drug The Smell St. Petersburg Times, July 11, 1978
smugglers.[7] [5] Operation Stopgap The Spokesman Review, September
16, 1978
325
Chapter 249
PSN-375,963
• PSN-632,408
249.2 References
[1] Overton HA, Babbs AJ, Doel SM, Fyfe MC, Gardner
LS, Griffin G, Jackson HC, Procter MJ, Rasamison
CM, Tang-Christensen M, Widdowson PS, Williams
GM, Reynet C. (2006). “Deorphanization of a G
protein-coupled receptor for oleoylethanolamide
and its use in the discovery of small-molecule hy-
pophagic agents.”. Cell Metab. 3 (3): 167–175.
doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.004. PMID 16517404.
326
Chapter 250
PSN-632,408
• PSN-375,963
250.2 References
[1] Overton HA, Babbs AJ, Doel SM, Fyfe MC, Gardner
LS, Griffin G, Jackson HC, Procter MJ, Rasamison
CM, Tang-Christensen M, Widdowson PS, Williams
GM, Reynet C. (2006). “Deorphanization of a G
protein-coupled receptor for oleoylethanolamide
and its use in the discovery of small-molecule hy-
pophagic agents.”. Cell Metab. 3 (3): 167–175.
doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.004. PMID 16517404.
327
Chapter 251
Soma Seeds
251.1 References
[1] Cannabis Cup winners 1999.
328
Chapter 252
TM-38837
252.2 References
[1] http://www.7tm.com
[2] Hung, M. S.; Chang, C. P.; Li, T. C.; Yeh, T. K.; Song,
J. S.; Lin, Y.; Wu, C. H.; Kuo, P. C.; Amancha, P. K.;
Wong, Y. C.; Hsiao, W. C.; Chao, Y. S.; Shia, K. S.
(2010). “Discovery of 1-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)−4-ethyl-
5-(5-(2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethynyl)thiophen-
2-yl)-N-(piperidin-1-yl)−1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide
as a Potential Peripheral Cannabinoid-1 Receptor
Inverse Agonist”. ChemMedChem 5 (9): 1439–1443.
doi:10.1002/cmdc.201000246. PMID 20652930.
329
330 CHAPTER 252. TM-38837
• Tetrad test Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrad_test?oldid=443471240 Contributors: Chick Bowen, Roadnottaken, Jzlong, Aloy-
siusLiliusBot, Aaron Kauppi and Anonymous: 1
• Tetrahydrocannabinol Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol?oldid=630780019 Contributors: Damian Yerrick, Ax-
elBoldt, Kpjas, Bryan Derksen, The Anome, Tarquin, Malcolm Farmer, SimonP, Pit, Gabbe, Chinju, Paul A, MichaelJanich, Mkweise,
Ahoerstemeier, HarmonicSphere, TUF-KAT, JWSchmidt, Evercat, Iorsh, SaveThePoint, Andrevan, Furrykef, Gutsul, Robbot, Astro-
nautics, Mirv, UtherSRG, Hif, DocWatson42, Nunh-huh, BenFrantzDale, Bradeos Graphon, Guanaco, St3vo, Eequor, Richard Myers,
Andycjp, Geus, Sonjaaa, Ferre, Antandrus, HistoryBA, AlexanderWinston, OwenBlacker, Gene s, Bk0, Rlcantwell, Joyous!, Mearlon,
Gerrit, Tonik, Idolcrash, Lynto008, Adashiel, Porges, Stevenmattern, Discospinster, Rich Farmbrough, Guanabot, Cacycle, Pie4all88,
Bender235, Mykhal, Calair, Jensbn, Livajo, Cedders, Kwamikagami, Dennis Brown, Jpgordon, Jonathan Drain, Bobo192, Timon, Fly-
ing Hamster, Smalljim, Shenme, Viriditas, Mrdude, NotAbel, ZayZayEM, Giraffedata, Alansohn, Eleland, PopUpPirate, Eric Kvaalen,
Atlant, Benjah-bmm27, Andrew Gray, Howrealisreal, Thoric, Ransack, Ynhockey, Hu, Velella, Keziah, Gene Nygaard, Netkinetic, Cey-
ockey, Japanese Searobin, Ron Ritzman, Mindmatrix, Lunar Jesters, Rajiv Varma, Kzollman, CiTrusD, GregorB, Jon Harald Søby, Palica,
SqueakBox, Magister Mathematicae, Mendaliv, Canderson7, Sjö, Rjwilmsi, Londonbroil, Soakologist, Pabix, Heah, Rpinz, Nneonneo,
DirkvdM, X1987x, FlaBot, Ground Zero, Mister Matt, AJR, Vayne, TheDJ, Wgfcrafty, Diza, Consumed Crustacean, Butros, WriterHound,
Joseph11h, YurikBot, NTBot, Petiatil, Pacaro, Chris Capoccia, Ansell, Shaddack, NawlinWiki, Ytcracker, Johann Wolfgang, Belkov,
ONEder Boy, Nad, Afiler, Xdenizen, Moe Epsilon, DeadEyeArrow, Bota47, BraneJ, Louieduvall, Max Schwarz, Mike Serfas, Zzuuzz,
TheMadBaron, KGasso, Jolt76, BorgQueen, JRey, LeonardoRob0t, JLaTondre, CIreland, SmackBot, Mitchan, Brammers, Slashme, An-
archist42, Unyoyega, ParkerHiggins, Davewild, WookieInHeat, Jrockley, Jab843, Edgar181, HalfShadow, Gilliam, Ohnoitsjamie, Hmains,
Shaggorama, Iain.dalton, Ksenon, Dolive21, Master of Puppets, GregRM, MalafayaBot, Domthedude001, SchfiftyThree, Zachorious,
Mladifilozof, MaxSem, Muboshgu, Can't sleep, clown will eat me, Chlewbot, OrphanBot, Addshore, Bulbous, Cybercobra, T-borg, Drphil-
harmonic, DMacks, A5b, Lambiam, AThing, John, Jidanni, Gobonobo, Shlomke, Stwalkerster, Beetstra, Waggers, SandyGeorgia, Nialsh,
Iridescent, Camb15, Newone, Igoldste, LadyofShalott, Nalco, Courcelles, Tawkerbot2, OS2Warp, Switchercat, CmdrObot, ArmyOfFluo-
ride, Rikva, WeggeBot, T23c, Meodipt, Karmak, Cydebot, Rifleman 82, Gogo Dodo, D666D, A Softer Answer, Odie5533, Tawkerbot4,
Carstensen, Codetiger, Dyakofborneo, Daven200520, Pinky sl, Epbr123, Legolas558, Loudsox, Bendroz, Yukichigai, Subvertc, Head-
bomb, Chrisdab, Rhrad, Matthew Proctor, Pfranson, Dawnseeker2000, Noclevername, Escarbot, Porqin, Exhilaration157, AntiVandalBot,
The Obento Musubi, RobotG, DarkAudit, Smartse, GodGell, Spencer, Elaragirl, Deflective, MSBOT, Iownutopia, .anacondabot, Acro-
terion, Mattb112885, Bongwarrior, VoABot II, Jeff Dahl, JNW, JamesBWatson, Gold3nrul3, Balloonguy, Hiplibrarianship, Mreaster,
Allstarecho, Tins128, Ajgregory, Pax:Vobiscum, MartinBot, By97aa, ChemNerd, Anaxial, Nono64, Leyo, Hairchrm, Fconaway, Lilac
Soul, Tgeairn, J.delanoy, Bogey97, Boghog, Cocoaguy, Alwaysasking, Solidach, Afluegel, Mikael Häggström, L'Aquatique, Alphapeta,
Plasticup, SJP, Enix150, Cometstyles, Bondo 6464, HazyM, Martial75, Halmstad, Signalhead, Gothbag, Deor, Hammersoft, VolkovBot,
Rtdixon86, Philip Trueman, DoorsAjar, TXiKiBoT, A4bot, Qxz, Victimofleisure, Ph33rspace, Martin451, Wikieditor12, Tpk5010, Jstein-
hoefel, Dvmedis, Vaubin, Nadsozinc, Falcon8765, Puusq, LetTheSunshineIn, Fischer.sebastian, Skepticignorant, Tbg connor, Peter Fleet,
SieBot, Coffee, Da Joe, YourEyesOnly, Aswad87, Yintan, Agador, BrienIsSexy4, Flyer22, Alexbrn, Oneku201, Oxymoron83, Hello71,
Poindexter Propellerhead, WacoJacko, La Parka Your Car, StaticGull, Mike2vil, DaDrought3, Dala11a, Mygerardromance, PerryTachett,
Nn123645, 30SEC2, DRTllbrg, Chem-awb, Kanonkas, Tanvir Ahmmed, ClueBot, PipepBot, Anthonyvidal, The Thing That Should Not
Be, Voxpuppet, MedialLateral, Yikrazuul, Drmies, Mild Bill Hiccup, Shinpah1, Redspades, Leodmacleod, Niceguyedc, Chiosu, Flube-
cabot, Excirial, Jusdafax, Ltnemo2000, John Nevard, Paymaun, Panoramix303, Jophis, Alchemist01010101, Cenarium, Iohannes Animo-
sus, XeroX16, Williadb, BlackHoleSon, Thingg, Aitias, 7, Versus22, NJGW, BlueDevil, 0Chance, DumZiBoT, Skunkboy74, Chemgirl131,
JS747, Ost316, SilvonenBot, NellieBly, NHJG, LikeHolyWater, Conversationalskills, Addbot, Piz d'Es-Cha, RHCP420, C6541, DOI bot,
Tcncv, Eltone, Binary TSO, Ronhjones, Dnnisrdz, Skyezx, Protonk, Glass Sword, AndersBot, Roux, WikiDegausser, Sepulwiki, Adam
Willenbrecht, Aldrich Hanssen, Pnpointer, Tide rolls, OlEnglish, Alfie66, Ben Ben, Drpickem, Slayer14666, Yobot, Andreasmperu, Ptbot-
gourou, CheMoBot, Whiskeydog, TestEditBot, Tempodivalse, Synchronism, Slowgenius, TheHighTree, AnomieBOT, Tryptofish, Metal-
head94, Casforty, Götz, Choij, Message From Xenu, Modanung, Ulric1313, Bluerasberry, Mahmudmasri, Materialscientist, Citation bot,
BlurTento, LilHelpa, Simultaneous movement, The Firewall, Apothecia, Jason.Singer, Capricorn42, Millahnna, Br77rino, حسن علي البط,
Harbinary, Xxkeeenxx, Malbano17, Inferno, Lord of Penguins, Coretheapple, Cmerlin2, Anand droog, Shit Goes Here, Lapuchca, Crab-
juicer, SassoBot, RomanHunt, Kyng, Tony12893, X172, C4andrei, Psychonaught, Neolith100, Evangelika, Ajax151, Custoo, Jatlas, Lothar
von Richthofen, StaticVision, Vishnu2011, Ryan.rota, Laff able, Citation bot 1, Izzardthegizzard, Pinethicket, Jrew86, A8UDI, Jschnur,
SpaceFlight89, Tea with toast, BogBot, Bioextra, Smatrese, DadOfBeanAndBug, MemphisUPEI, David Hedlund, Diannaa, 4ndyD, Suffu-
sion of Yellow, Dungeonscaper, Gtziavelis, Dick blixen, Kanelbulle, DARTH SIDIOUS 2, Ashox D-Shay, Realizen, Moshasaurus, Rjwilm-
siBot, Ripchip Bot, FetchcommsAWB, Dizanl, Beyond My Ken, NerdyScienceDude, SeeKatethisisme, EmausBot, Franfran2010, Rbaselt,
RA0808, 4meter4, Slightsmile, Tommy2010, John Cline, Jaydiem, ElationAviation, GZ-Bot, H3llBot, Cimmerian praetor, Dpdrums, L
Kensington, Bayhemp, Tick avenger, DASHBotAV, Hetoi, Louisajb, ClueBot NG, Gaujo, Mini.knowledge.pea, Nielswillems26, FarmDee,
Billyrubin2008, Skoot13, Hempknight121, Cj005257, Avagad2, Mesoderm, O.Koslowski, Widr, Helpful Pixie Bot, Psychonaut25, Bib-
code Bot, Kenan133, DBigXray, BG19bot, Petrarchan47, Northamerica1000, Stuartteal, Spy12190, Nikos 1993, TheMan4000, Cbakker,
Snow Blizzard, NotWith, Zujua, Wyliea, Zmbonvallat, Fuse809, TheBaur, LegacyWeapon, Indirectantagonist, EuroCarGT, 14jay69,
Jeschjesch, Blazedbuddha, 00AgentBond93, Gareth CHEBI, Kilasic, Craigcrawford1988, CannaWikibiss, K-ronzagwarn, MidnightRe-
questLine, Babapcck, Rainyhemptree, JulianaPacheco, Camyoung54, ScoutKnot, Youtalkfunny, DavidLeighEllis, ArmbrustBot, PreCam-
brianBunny, Seppi333, Mjlphd, BOBBOBLEYBOBSON, Die Antwoorde, Korean181, Meteor sandwich yum, Lyschamb, Monkbot, 235N,
Formerly 98, A915, Joshuabumbarger, Santavy2014, JoPhoenix, Fuzznerdees, Medgirl131, Amc98, GP10698 and Anonymous: 949
• Tetrahydrocannabinol-C4 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol-C4?oldid=618601612 Contributors: Cacycle, Na-
talya, BD2412, Pegship, Meodipt, Astavats, Benrr101, Mild Bill Hiccup, Phil Ian Manning, Chemgirl131, Yobot, CheMoBot, حسن علي
البط, ZackRegit, BogBot, Nikos 1993, NotWith, Monkbot and Jakenowatzke
• Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinolic_acid?oldid=614212282 Contributors:
Rjwilmsi, Meodipt, Wikieditor12, Benrr101, Götz, Jim1138, Monkbot and Anonymous: 4
• Tetrahydrocannabivarin Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabivarin?oldid=630568385 Contributors: William Avery,
St3vo, Rich Farmbrough, Cacycle, Ceyockey, Amire80, Fred Bradstadt, Physchim62, WriterHound, YurikBot, Gaius Cornelius, Pegship,
Edgar181, Naturalsol, Chris the speller, Fireemblem555, Smith609, Beetstra, Meodipt, Alaibot, Probios, VolkovBot, GeorgeLTirebiter,
Chem-awb, Panoramix303, Burner0718, Chemgirl131, MystBot, Addbot, DOI bot, Wormantson, CheMoBot, Casforty, Obersachsebot,
حسن علي البط, Custoo, Citation bot 1, UFO Reporter, MastiBot, BogBot, CrowzRSA, Jynto, ClueBot NG, Nikos 1993, NotWith,
Sfgiants1995, Jakenowatzke, Medgirl131, Mplanine and Anonymous: 20
• THC-O-acetate Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THC-O-acetate?oldid=586788432 Contributors: Cacycle, Pegship, SmackBot,
Edgar181, Afasmit, Beetstra, Meodipt, JaGa, CheMoBot, حسن علي البط, BogBot, Helpful Pixie Bot, ChrisGualtieri and Anonymous: 1
252.4. TEXT AND IMAGE SOURCES, CONTRIBUTORS, AND LICENSES 339
252.4.2 Images
• File:(+)-(6aR,10aS)-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol_(with_hydrogen_atoms_shown).svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/2/20/%28%2B%29-%286aR%2C10aS%29-%CE%949-Tetrahydrocannabinol_%28with_hydrogen_atoms_shown%29.svg
License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:(+)-(6aS,10aS)-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol_(with_hydrogen_atoms_shown).svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/b/b1/%28%2B%29-%286aS%2C10aS%29-%CE%949-Tetrahydrocannabinol_%28with_hydrogen_atoms_shown%29.svg
License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:(+)-trans-cannabitriol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/%28%2B%29-trans-cannabitriol.png
License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 Contributors: Self-published work by Cacycle Original artist: Cacycle
• File:(-)-trans-cannabitriol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/%28-%29-trans-cannabitriol.png Li-
cense: CC-BY-SA-3.0 Contributors: Self-published work by Cacycle Original artist: Cacycle
• File:(C6)-CP_47,497.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/%28C6%29-CP_47%2C497.png License:
Public domain Contributors: ChemSpider Original artist: ChemSpider
• File:(C9)-CP_47,497.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/%28C9%29-CP_47%2C497.png License:
Public domain Contributors: ChemSpider Original artist: ChemSpider
• File:(−)-(6aR,10aR)-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol_(with_hydrogen_atoms_shown).svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/3/39/%28%E2%88%92%29-%286aR%2C10aR%29-%CE%949-Tetrahydrocannabinol_%28with_hydrogen_atoms_
shown%29.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:(−)-(6aS,10aR)-Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol_(with_hydrogen_atoms_shown).svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/1/1d/%28%E2%88%92%29-%286aS%2C10aR%29-%CE%949-Tetrahydrocannabinol_%28with_hydrogen_atoms_shown%
29.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:10-oxo-delta-6a(10a)-tetrahydrocannabinol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/
10-oxo-delta-6a%2810a%29-tetrahydrocannabinol.png License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
• File:11-COOH-THC.svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/11-COOH-THC.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Harbin
• File:11-Hydroxy-THC-3D-balls.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/11-Hydroxy-THC-3D-balls.png
License: CC0 Contributors: This chemical image was created with Discovery Studio Visualizer. Original artist: Jynto (talk)
• File:11-OH-THC.svg Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/11-OH-THC.svg License: Public domain Contrib-
utors: Own work Original artist: Harbin
• File:2-(6-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)$-$5-pentyl-1,3-benzenediol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/
wikipedia/commons/b/b4/2-%286-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl%29-5-pentyl-1%2C3-benzenediol.png License: CC0
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:2-(6-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)$-$5-pentyl-1,3-benzenediol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/
wikipedia/commons/5/5d/2-%286-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl%29-5-pentyl-1%2C3-benzenediol.png License: CC0
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:2-(6-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl)$-$5-pentyl-1,3-benzenediol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/
wikipedia/commons/d/d2/2-%286-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl%29-5-pentyl-1%2C3-benzenediol.png License: CC0
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
• File:2-(6-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-4-cyclohexen-1-yl)$-$5-pentyl-1,3-benzenediol.png Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/
wikipedia/commons/6/67/2-%286-Isopropenyl-3-methyl-4-cyclohexen-1-yl%29-5-pentyl-1%2C3-benzenediol.png License: CC0
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Nikos 1993
252.4. TEXT AND IMAGE SOURCES, CONTRIBUTORS, AND LICENSES 343