net/publication/261185637
CITATIONS READS
4 178
1 author:
Walid Al-Kutti
Imam Abdul Rahman bin Faisal University
23 PUBLICATIONS 102 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Walid Al-Kutti on 27 August 2014.
Abstract: A multiphysics formulation for chloride diffusion in an RC beam with stress-induced damage quantifying the enhancement in
chloride diffusivity due to damage is presented. An experimental investigation involving measurement of chloride profile was conducted on
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University of Dammam on 03/30/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
RC beams damaged under applied flexural stress. Numerical simulation of the RC beam is carried out using a two-dimensional finite-element
approach incorporating the damage due to the applied stress, chloride binding, and the chloride diffusion in the model. Concrete is assumed to
be a perfectly elastoplastic (Drucker-Prager) material and the steel as an elastoplastic (von Mises) material with hardening. Drucker-Prager
parameters, cohesion c, and friction angle φ are obtained by calibrating numerical load-deflection (P-Δ) curve to an experimentally deter-
mined (P-Δ) plot for beams loaded in flexure. Defining a scalar damage index as the degradation in elastic modulus expressed in terms of total
strains, the chloride transport problem is addressed, using an effective diffusion coefficient, Deffd , expressed as a function of the damage index
and chloride binding and obtained by calibrating to data for chloride profiles as determined in flexurally damaged beams. Using the ex-
pressions for the effective diffusion coefficient, Deffd , the chloride profiles are shown to match the experimentally determined chloride profiles
in beams damaged at various stress levels. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000836. © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Author keywords: Chloride diffusion; Reinforced concrete beam; Elastoplastic modeling; Damage index; Tension damage; Compression
damage; Chloride binding.
varying degrees of sophistication have been proposed (Mazars tightened up while monitoring the strain in the reinforcing steel
and Pijaudier-Cabot 1989; Taher et al. 1994; Khan et al. 2007; at the midspan using a data logger. The nuts were tightened to
Voyiadjis et al. 2009). The phenomenological approach suggested achieve strain in reinforcing steel of approximately the same mag-
by Mazars and Pijaudier-Cabot (1989) is used to evaluate a scalar nitude as recorded in the damaged state from the four-point flexural
damage. The influence of damage on the response of the material load tests. Fig. 1 shows the arrangement for stressing the RC beams
based on this approach is based on the degradation of its elastic to the desired stress levels.
stiffness. The uniaxial stress-strain relationship is given by The damaged and undamaged beams were then exposed to 8%
σ ¼ Eε and E ¼ ð1 − dÞEo ð8Þ NaCl solution to simulate marine exposure condition for a period of
3 months. The left and right surfaces of the beams were sealed with
where Eo and E = secant undamaged and damaged moduli, respec- epoxy so that chloride could penetrate only from tension and com-
tively; and d = scalar damage variable. Taher et al. (1994) devel- pression surfaces. After 90 days of exposure, the specimens were
oped an elastodamage model for concrete using a constitutive law cleaned and dried to remove the surface moisture and drilled to
proposed by Popovics (1973) for stress-total strain relation of plain depths of 5, 15, 35, 50, and 75 mm at a distance of 120 mm from
concrete subjected to uniaxial compressive stress given as follows: the support and at the midspan of the RC beam as shown in Fig. 2
to obtain the powder samples for determining the water-soluble
σ mðεεu and acid-soluble chloride concentration in concrete. The rapid chlo-
¼ ð9Þ
σu m − 1 þ εε m ride test (RCT) and rapid chloride test water (RCTW) systems by
u
Germann Instruments (2006) were used to determine the amount of
where σu and εu = peak stress and strain, respectively; and m = acid-soluble and water-soluble chlorides (free chloride), respec-
parameter dependent on σu as reported by Popovics (1973). Using tively. The powder sample was mixed into a distinct amount of ex-
Eq. (9), a relationship between the moduli and damage variable traction liquid and shaken for 5 min. The extracted liquid removes
could be obtained and the scalar damage parameter d in compres- disturbing ions, such as sulfide ions, and extracts the chloride ions
sion and tension can be obtained as in the sample. A calibrated electrode is submerged in the solution to
determine the amount of chloride ion, which is expressed as per-
E mc − 1 centage of the concrete mass.
d¼1− ¼1− for εx < 0ðcompressionÞ ð10Þ
Ec mc − 1 þ εεx mc
u
150 mm
150 mm
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University of Dammam on 03/30/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Fig. 1. Arrangement for the pair of the RC beams loaded back to back using steel frames
Fig. 3. Flowchart for the simulation of effect of mechanical damage on chloride diffusivity in RC beams
100 4000
90
Reinforcement Strains at Midspan x 10 -6
100% Loading
50 ACI 2000 75% Loading
40 60% Loading
1500 40% Loading
30
COMSOL
1000
20
10 500
First cracking load at P=8 kN
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Deflection at Midspan (mm)
Deflection at Midspan (mm)
Fig. 4. Experimental load-midspan deflection curve for beam loaded to Fig. 5. Experimental reinforcement strain-midspan deflection curve
failure versus COMSOL simulation for 40, 60, 75, and 100% loaded beams
Mechanical Damage in the beams under flexural loading at first crack load and 40,
Fig. 6 shows the damage index distribution [using the scalar 60, and 100% of ultimate loading is shown. It can be seen from
damage definition as given by Eqs. (10) and (11)] in half of the Fig. 6 that in the constant moment zone at first cracking load,
reinforced beam span (L=2 ¼ 600 mm). Development of the the scalar-tension-induced damage ranges from 0.08 to 0.1 along
stress-induced damage index for compressive and tensile stress a depth of 70 mm from the bottom of the beam. After cracking the
α 2.39
β 15.6 1
Scalar expression Fd 7.5d2 þ 0.8d þ 1 for tension Fb ¼ 2.39
ð15Þ
1 þ ð1þ15.6C Þ2
1.15d þ 1 for compression f
Fig. 6. Tensile damage index d at (a) first cracking, (b) 40%, (c) 60%, and (d) ultimate loading
0.3
Table 2. Correlation between Damage Function Fd and Chloride
Undamaged
Diffusivity at Various Tensile Stress Levels
0.25
Level of Tensile strain Fd ¼ Deffd =
40%Loading loading εx ðmm=mmÞ d Deffd ðmm2 =sÞ ðDe · Fb Þ
Cf % wt. of Concrete
0.2
60%Loading 0 0 0 2.1 × 10−6 1.0
40 1.3 × 10−4 0.62 7.4 × 10−6 2.9
0.15
75%Loading 60 1.9 × 10−4 0.74 1.7 × 10−5 6.7
75 6.8 × 10−4 0.95 2.1 × 10−5 8.3
90%Loading 90 13 × 10−4 0.98 2.2 × 10−5 8.7
0.1
0.05
Table 3. Correlation between Damage Function Fd and Chloride
Diffusivity at Various Compressive Stress Levels
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Level of Compressive strain Fd ¼ Deffd =
Depth in mm loading εx ðmm=mmÞ d Deffd ðmm2 =sÞ ðDe · Fb Þ
0 0 0 2.0 × 10−6 1.00
Fig. 8. Free chloride profile in damaged and undamaged beams 60 1.6 × 10−3 0.10 2.9 × 10−6 1.15
75 1.8 × 10−3 0.15 3.1 × 10−6 1.23
90 2.6 × 10−3 0.40 3.6 × 10−6 1.43
1
0.45 0.9
0.3 0.6
60%Loading
0.5
0.25 75%Loading Compressive
0.4 Damage
0.2 90%Loading
0.3
Tensile
0.15 Damage
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.05 0
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Total Strain ∋x (mm/mm)
Depth in mm
Fig. 10. Relationship between the scalar damage d and total strain εx at
Fig. 9. Total chloride profile in damaged and undamaged beams the maximum moment zone
strain of concrete in tension, with a reasonable correlation between sive zones because cracks in the tensile zones form parallel to the
compressive-induced damage and strain as well. direction of chloride ingress, whereas, in compression, they are
approximately transverse to the direction of flow.
10.00
9.00
Simulation of Chloride Diffusion in Damaged Concrete
y = 7.5d2 + 0.8d + 1
8.00
R² = 0.95 Using the calibrated models obtained for effective diffusivity, Deffd ,
7.00
Fd = Deffd/(Fcb x Do)
Fig. 12. Free chloride distribution in RC beams subjected to different flexural loading: (a) undamaged; (b) 40% loading; (c) 60% loading; (d) ultimate
loading
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 flexural loading. Influence of compression damage on diffusivity is
Depth in mm not as pronounced as that due to tension-induced damage, as in the
tensile zone the orientation of cracks is in the direction of chloride
Fig. 13. Chloride profiles using the model and experimental values for diffusion, whereas in the compression zone major segments of the
different tensile damage levels (120 mm from support) cracks are perpendicular to the path of chloride transport. The in-
fluence of binding phenomenon on chloride diffusion results in a
reduction of approximately 25% of chloride diffusivity in concrete.
7.0 Using the approach outlined in this paper, the impact of damage
on chloride transport may be used for predicting the reduction in
6.0
service life of stressed reinforced concrete members in a corrosive
Proposed Model
environment. This can be achieved by estimating the ratio of ser-
vice stress to ultimate strength levels in the structural components,
5.0 Xing et al.(2005) correlating it to the damage influence functions that would estimate
He and Gong (2005) the enhancement in chloride diffusivity, which in turn would serve
Deffd/(Fcb x Do)
2.0
Acknowledgments
This work has been completed under the Deanship of Scientific
1.0 Research funded research project FT090004 “Service Life Assess-
ment of Stressed Concrete Members under Chloride Attack.” The
0.0 authors acknowledge the support of King Fahd University of
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
/fcr Petroleum & Minerals, the Department of Civil Engineering, and
the Center for Engineering Research at Research Institute in the
Fig. 14. Comparison between the proposed model and experimental pursuit of this research endeavor.
results from literature for tension damage
Notation
distance of 120 mm from the support (for tensile-induced damage) The following symbols are used in this paper:
is shown in Fig. 13 and it can be noted that the proposed model is Cb = bound chloride in grams of chloride per gram of
reasonably predicting the free chloride profile for sound and dam- concrete;
aged concrete. Cf = free chloride in grams of chloride per gram of concrete;
To verify the proposed model in Eq. (16), experimental results Ct = total chloride in grams of chloride per gram of concrete;
reported by Sakoi and Horiguchi (2006), He and Gong (2005), and c = cohesion (MPa);
Xing et al. (2005) were compared with the same level of stress ob- De = chloride diffusion coefficient in undamaged concrete
tained from the COMSOL model at a distance of 120 mm from the (mm2 =s);
support of the RC beams (Fig. 14). The proposed model predicts Deffd = effective chloride diffusion coefficient (mm2 =s);
reasonably well the data obtained for the effective diffusivity d = scalar damage index;
coefficient due to damage in tension as obtained by Sakoi and dc = compressive scalar damage index;
Horiguichi (2006), He and Gong (2005), and Xing et al. (2005). dt = tensile scalar damage index;
E = damage secant modulus (MPa);
Eo = undamage secant modulus (MPa);
Summary and Conclusions Es = Young’s modulus of reinforcement steel (MPa);
Fcb = chloride binding influence function;
A coupled experimental and numerical study of chloride diffusion Fd = mechanical damage influence function;
in RC beams damaged in flexure and exposed to 8% NaCl solution Fys = yield stress of reinforcement steel (MPa);
for 3 months is presented. In the proposed numerical model, a sca- I = hydrostatic component of the stress tensor;
lar damage index is defined in terms of total strains. The model also J 2 = deviatoric stress tensor invariant;
Ababneh, A., Benboudjema, F., and Xi, Y. (2003). “Chloride penetration J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000458, 789–796.
in nonsaturated concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0899 Saetta, A. V., Scotta, R. V., and Vitaliani, R. V. (1993). ‘‘Analysis of chlo-
-1561(2003)15:2(183), 183–191. ride diffusion into partially saturated concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 5(90),
Aldea, C., Shah, S., and Karr, A. (1999). “Effect of cracking on water 441–451.
and chloride permeability of concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/ Sahmaran, M. (2007). “Effect of flexure induced transverse crack and self-
(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:3(181), 181–187. healing on chloride diffusivity of reinforced mortar.” J Mater. Sci.,
American Concrete Institute. (2002). “Building code requirements for 42(22), 9131–9136.
reinforced concrete.” ACI 318, Detroit. Sakoi, Y., and Horiguchi, T. (2006). “Loading effects on chloride penetra-
Chatzigeorgiou, G., Picandet, V., Khelidj, A., and Pijaudier-Cabot, G. tion of fiber reinforced concrete.” Proc., 2nd Int. Fib Congress,
(2005). “Coupling between progressive damage and permeability of (CD-ROM), Naples, Italy, 1–7.
concrete: Analysis with a discrete model.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Samaha, H. R., and Hover, K. C. (1992). “Influence of microcracking
Geomech., 29(10), 1005–1018. on the mass transport properties of concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 89(4),
COMSOL [Computer software]. COMSOL, Burlington, MA. 416–424.
Djerbi, A., Bonnet, S., Khelidj, A., and Baroghel-Bouny, V. (2008). Sergi, G., Yu, S. W., and Page, C. L. (1992). “Diffusion of chloride and
“Influence of traversing crack on chloride diffusion into concrete.” hydroxyl ions in cementitious materials exposed to a saline environ-
Cem. Concr. Res., 38(6), 877–883. ment.” Mag. Concr. Res., 44(158), 63–69.
François, R., and Arliguie, G. (1998). “Influence of service cracking on Shazali, M. A., Rahman, M. K., Al-Gadhib, A. H., and Baluch, M. H.
reinforcement steel corrosion.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE) (2012). “Transport modeling of chlorides with binding in concrete.”
0899-1561(1998)10:1(14), 14–20. Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 37(2), 469–479.
Garces-Rodriguez, O., and Hooton, R. D. (2003). “Influence of cracks Song, H. W., Lee, C. H., and Ann, K. Y. (2008). “Factors influencing chlo-
chloride ingress into concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 100(2), 120–126. ride transport in concrete structures exposed to marine environments.”
Gérard, B., and Marchand, J. (2000). “Influence of cracking on the diffu- Cem. Concr. Compos., 30(2), 113–121.
sion properties of cement-based materials, part I: Influence of continu- Taher, S., Baluch, M. H., and Al-Gadhib, A. H. (1994). “Towards canonical
ous cracks on the steady-state regime.” Cem. Concr. Res., 30(1), 37–43. elastoplatic damage model.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 48(2), 151–166.
Germann Instruments. (2006). “Instruction and maintenance manual.” Tang, L., and Nilsson, L. O. (1992). “Rapid determination of the chloride
Copenhagen, Denmark. diffusivity in concrete by applying an electrical field.” ACI Mater. J.,
Gjorv, O. E., and Vennesland, O. (1979). “Diffusion of chloride ions from 49(1), 49–53.
seawater into concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., 9(2), 229–238. Thomas, M. D. A., and Bamforth, P. B. (1999). “Modelling chloride dif-
Gowripalan, N., Sirivivatnanon, V., and Lim, C. C. (2000). “Chloride diffu- fusion in concrete: Effect of fly ash and slag.” Cem. Concr. Res., 29(4),
sivity of concrete cracked in flexure.” Cem. Concr. Res., 30(5), 725–730. 487–495.
Guoping, L., Fangjian, H., and Yongxian, W. (2011). “Chloride ion pen- Voyiadjis, G. Z., Taqieddin, Z. N., and Kattan, P. I. (2009). “Theoretical
etration in stressed concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT formulation of a coupled elastic-plastic anisotropic damage model
.1943-5533.0000281, 1145–1153. for concrete using the strain energy equivalence concept.” Int. J. Dam-
He, S. Q., and Gong, J. X. (2005). “Influence of flexural loading on per- age Mech., 18(7), 603–638.
meability of chloride ion in concrete.” J. Build. Mater., 8(2), 134–138 Wang, H., Lu, C., Jin, W., and Bai, Y. (2011). “Effect of external loads on
(In Chinese). chloride transport in concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)
Ismail, M., Tuomi, A., Francois, R., and Gagne, R. (2008). “Effect of crack MT.1943-5533.0000265, 1043–1049.
opening on the local diffusion coefficient of chloride in cracked mortar Wang, K., Jansen, D. C., Shah, S. P., and Karr, A. (1997). “Permeability
samples.” Cem. Concr. Res., 38(8–9), 1106–1111. study of cracked concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., 27(3), 381–393.
Kachanov, L. M. (1958). “Time of the rupture process under creep condi- Xi, Y., and Bazant, Z. P. (1999). “Modeling chloride penetration in satu-
tions.” Isv. Akad. Nauk., SSR. Otd. Tekh. Nauk, 8, 26–31. rated concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)
Khan, A. R., Al-Gadhib, A. H., and Baluch, M. H. (2007). “Elasto-damage 11:1(58), 58–65.
constitutive model for high strength concrete subjected to multiaxial Xi, Y., and Nakhi, A. (2005). “Composite damage models for diffusivity of
loading.” Int. J. Damage Mech., 16(3), 361–398. distressed materials.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561
Lim, C. C., Gowripalan, N., and Sirivivatnanon, V. (2004). “Microcracking (2005)17:3(286), 286–295.
and chloride ion diffusion of concrete under sustained uniaxial com- Xing, F., Lemg, F. G., and Feng, N. Q. (2005). “The influence of long-term
pression.” ACI Special Publication 221, American Concrete Institute, load on the chloride permeability in reinforced concrete.” Proc. Int.
Farmington Hills, MI, 893–910. Workshop Durability of Reinforced Concrete under Combined
Mangat, P. S., and Molloy, B. T. (1994). “Prediction of long term chloride Mechanical and Climate Loads (CMCL), T. Zhao, F. H. Wittmann,
concentration in concrete.” Mater. Struct., 27(6), 338–346. and T. Ueda, eds., Adeificatio Publishers, Freiburg, Germany, 139–147.
Martin-Perez, B., Zibara, H., Hooton, R. D., and Thomas, M. D. A. (2000). Yuan, Q., Shi, C., De Schutter, G., Deng, D., and He, F. (2011). “Numerical
“A study of the effect of chloride binding on service life prediction.” model for chloride penetration into saturated concrete.” J. Mater. Civ.
Cem. Concr. Res., 30(8), 1215–1223. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000168, 305–311.