Anda di halaman 1dari 5

Cross examining

the Investigative
Judgment
Justification by faith
and Daniel 8:14

HKEA
Evangelistic Alliance
Suite 244, 135 Cardigan Street, Carlton Vic 3053
Australia
Email: hkea@hkea.org.au
Web: http://www.hkea.org.au
ii

INVITATION
TO READERS

This material was drafted in late 2003 as a preliminary


investigation. The landscape is vast and complex.
Readers are encouraged to contact the writer with
input so this work may be enhanced and finalised
during 2004 at which time it will be posted on the web
as a PDF file.

Contributions used in the work will be acknowledged.

All references in this work to “Adventism”, “Adventist”


or “SDAs” mean “Seventh-day Adventist”.

The term “Investigative” judgment is an unfortunate idiom


as it implies the Almighty needs to be informed.
The expression is only adopted in this work to maintain a
link to Dr Ford’s publication whose title and work uses the
term. The SDA Church today adopts the more appropriate
expression “Pre-Advent” judgment.

Herb Kersten
Suite 244, 135 Cardigan Street
Carlton Vic 3053
Australia
hkea@hkea.org.au
iii

DEDICATION
To Pastor David Currie and his family for their support and wise
counsel.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
As at 12 October 2004 the following people have graciously
given of their time to read the manuscript. Not all the names
listed endorse the totality of the document but have offered
valuable suggestions and insights for which I am most grateful:

Pastor David Currie Melbourne, Australia


Pastor Keith Hankinson Lakes Entrance, Australia
Pastor Greg Evans Melbourne, Australia
Pastor Alfred Jorgensen Melbourne, Australia
Pastor Austin Fletcher Cooranbong, Australia
Pastor Raymond Stanley Cooranbong, Australia
Pastor Slawek Malarek Melbourne, Australia
Dr Angel Rodriguez General Conference (BRI)
Dr Paul Petersen South Pacific Division
Dr Ross Cole Avondale College
Dr Norman Young Avondale College
Dr Desmond Ford Brisbane, Australia
Dr John Stewart Melbourne, Australia
Dr Peter McGowan Melbourne, Australia
iv

You blind guides!


You strain out a gnat
but swallow a camel.
Matthew 23:24 (NIV)
v

CONTENTS

CHAPT TITLE ISSUE PAGE


Historicism, preterism, futurism.
1 School’s Out Apotelesmatic principle. 8 - 33
Dr Ford’s theology.
APPENDIX Replies to observations. i–xxvii

2 Year Day Year-day principle. 34 - 40

3 Answers In The The Question of Dan 8:13. 41 - 46


Question

4 Questioning The Day of Atonement in Dan 8:14. 47 - 57


Answer
APPENDIX Replies to observations. i-iii

5 The Date Is The Fix Commencement date for Dan 8:14. 58 – 84

6 Sure it’s ’44? Four secondary tests for 1844. 85 – 92

APPENDIX Replies to observations. i-iii

7 Places and Veils Hebrews 9. 93 - 104

APPENDIX Replies to observations. i-vi

8 Pre-Advent The Investigative Judgment in the 104 -114


Justification context of the Great Controversy.

9 Revival keys Justification by faith 115-123

10 22 Points Replies to objections. 124 -134


Index A-Z topical listing i - iii
Bibliography Sources 135 -139

Anda mungkin juga menyukai