3.

3 Overview of design

It is obvious to implement a platform smart building within wireless sensor network along our sensors imagining a
corridor of smart building size 50.0mX1.8mX2.9m. These parameters from environment of building are transmitted
with data communication networks and being monitored by data server tools. In NS2 event driven simulation tool
where we have been used IEEE 802.15.4 as well as wireless network functions (routing algorithms, UDP) which
have been done in that also. The 802.15.4 category is probably the most standard for low-data-rate monitor and
control applications and elongated-life low-power-consumption uses. Here DSDV for routing protocol which has
been carried out whole simulation session with 100ms. As the hypothetical correspondence go is packed, the
transmission range vitality is more focused. Contrasting and open air WSN, the nodes transmission control field is
never again homogeneously round. Here we implement single topology with maximum 2mm distance between
every two nodes. We the implement 23 nodes which are implement in way that we can achieve minimum packet
loss with efficiency. One of the nodes who is close to base station collects data and send it to the server to control air
conditioning units of our application. Predicated based on that for time interval is to 20ms on critical condition. If it
detects a critical situation the packet will be sent with in time which is 25-30ms intervals. Then we have to set
frequency band at most 2.5GHz the threshold level identically tantamount to -76dB.

3.4 Results and Analysis

To evaluate this platform several measurements have been considered for monitoring temperature and humidity of
our desired area. An awk file has been generated to evaluate the performance received, sent drooped packet along
with average end to end delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput.

Execution measurements in this WSN based intelligent building are evaluated as a related capacity of dividing
between transmitter-collector remove, sort of jumping between remote sensor hubs, kind of building material put
between transmitter-collector, testing rate, the impedance by other ISM recurrence ranges and number of nodes .

Flowing table has been shown our results by simulating our application in ns2 and evaluating the performance
parameters.

Nodes 5 15 18 19 20 22 23
Sent packet 9973 19688 3966 4910 5437 5091 17598
Received Packet 3428 8949 2294 3553 3852 3644 13809

Dropped packet 6545 10739 1672 1357 1585 1477 3796

Average
Delay(ms) 1 9 11 13 13 13 1
PDR 34 45 57 72 76 71 78
Throughput 15 79 81 108 109 108 162

Figure1, Figure2, Figure3 are showing the the performance analysis(PDA, average ene to end delay, throughput) of
our application simulations with several times .
Figure 1 demonstrates the PDR for deployment of various numbers of nodes in network

It has been seen PDR is increasing along with increasing nodes but packet drops are increasing because of obstacles
.We have found that from significant paper that the rate of data loss increase when the obstacle become more than
3db. However we can say that our application has secure from error prone communication because it has achieved
maximum successful packet delivey along with increasing throughput.
Figure 2 average end to end delays with confidence interval

The average worst case delay has been achieved from node 18. As a function of distance with obstacles has been
increased along with increasing number of nodes we can find the critical point here for application simulation. It has
been seen average delay increase sharply from node 5 to 17 the it reaches the saturation point where it can be found
worst case delay .
Figure 3 average throughputs (kbps) for smart building deployment of multiple nodes on platform

We can find that increasing of nodes along with packet loss in a significant manner the throughput has been
increased. Using the formula=(receiver packet size/(stopTime-startTime))*(8/1000). With being disturbance of
WSN performances the delay and packet ratio delivered are changing with a significant manner with having 23
nodes in our application. So the throughput achieved at that point is considered our best parameter in QoS metrics in
WSN.

Conclusion

This paper provided an overview of smart building application of implementation WSN in ns2. The simple
simulation based on performance analysis in WSN platform by considering PDR, delay, throughput of 23 nodes in
application of intelligent building in WSN under various arrangements. In spite of the fact that we attempted our
best to incorporate the vast majority of the basic parameters of intelligent building, a portion of the issues stayed to
be tended to; a standout amongst the most imperative issues is enormous information taking care of. Result of this
simulation would be valuable to lead building based home observing, and this strategy makes a difference new
research towards upgrade in the unwavering quality of remote correspondence in addition to adding proper
localization protocol for each node which will provide more security in wireless sensor network more efficiently.

Contribution

Umme Aysha:AWK, CBR file

Mili Patel:
REFERENCES

[1] Papatsimpa, C., & Linnartz, J. P. (2018). Energy efficient communication in smart building WSN running
distributed Hidden Markov chain presence detection algorithm. 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things
(WF-IoT). doi:10.1109/wf-iot.2018.8355221

[2] Ghayvat, H., et al. “Enhancement of WSN Based Smart Home to a Smart Building for Assisted Living: Design
Issues.” 2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2015,
doi:10.1109/csnt.2015.122

[3] Jacquemod, Cyril, et al. “WSN for Smart Building Application.” 10th European Workshop on Microelectronics
Education (EWME), 2014, doi:10.1109/ewme.2014.6877405