VALUE ADDITION
VANI, K. C.
PAK 6195
2008
DEHYDRATION OF MANGO PULP FOR
VALUE ADDITION
VANI, K. C.
PAK 6195
MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Dehydration of Mango pulp for Value
Addition” submitted by Ms. VANI, K.C. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
award of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in FOOD SCIENCE AND
NUTRITION to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, is a record of research
work carried out by her during the period of her study in this university under my guidance
and supervision and no part no part of thesis has been submitted for the award of any degree,
diploma, fellowship or similar titles.
Members:
1. _______________________________
(Dr. NEENA JOSHI)
2. _______________________________
(Dr. UMADEVI HIREMATH)
3. _______________________________
(Dr. USHA RAVINDRA)
4. _______________________________
(Dr. SUVARNA CHAVANNAVAR)
5. _______________________________
(Mr. CHANDRU)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It gives me immense gratification to express my deep sense of pleasure
to Dr. Sunanda Sharan, Chairman, Advisory Committee, Professor and Head,
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, UAS, GKVK, Bangalore for all the
determined attempts she has put through her inspiring guidance, outspoken
suggestions, generous help and encouragement throughout the study period. I
have been lucky enough to get an opportunity to work under her guidance.
I thank all my near and dear ones who have helped me to achieve
whatsoever so far.
Bangalore
June 2008 (VANI, K.C.)
ABSTRACT
The Mango (Mangifera indica) is the most popular fruit of Asia which is a
tropical fruit and is very much relished throughout the world for its
succulence, exotic flavor and delicious taste. Apart from its delicious taste,
it is nutritionally important fruit being a very good source of beta carotene
and antioxidants. India ranks first in the world annual production of 12
million tones and a share of 51%. Mango arrival hits in the market from
May to July every year and the export of pulp has become jittery on account
of changing market scenario. Suitable methods for preparing products from
mango pulp that have good storage life are necessary, to utilize mango
gainfully and minimize post harvest losses. Hence an attempt was made to
develop value added products from mango pulp and the organoleptic
evaluation along with the storage study was conducted. The product
developed was mango bar using Alphonso and Totapuri variety with value
addition of whey protein concentrate at different levels. The nutritional
composition of Alphonso and Totapuri pulp indicated that they contained
2.85%, 2.6% β-carotene, ascorbic acid was 34.8mg/100g 16.45mg/100g
and reducing sugar 6.06%, 5.16%, titrable acidity 0.42%, 0.46%, total
sugar 26.3%, 26.1%, moisture content of 89%, 84%, protein 2.6g %, 1.4g %
and fiber was 0.16g, 0.27g respectively. Organoleptic property revealed that
the value added product was highly acceptable at 5 point hedonic scale and
has good keeping quality up to two months without harmful microbial
growth and has good cost benefit ratio. Thus the value added, nutritionally
superior mango product could be a better alternative to exploit the niche
market for both farmers as well as entrepreneurs.
CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION 1-5
V DISCUSSION 64-72
VI SUMMARY 73-75
ANNEXURES
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
TITLE
NO. NO.
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE BETWEEN
NO. PAGES
2 Estimation of β-carotene 35
3 Flow chart for preparation of mango bar 37
LIST OF PLATES
PLATE TITLE BETWEEN
NO. PAGES
APPENDIX
TITLE
NO.
II Estimation of protein
IV Estimation of β-carotene
VI Microbial analysis
INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
Seventy five per cent of mangoes in India are aborted before reaching
maturity due to adverse climatic conditions. The mango processing industry
incurs heavy loss from raw to ripening stage to packaging of mangoes
resulting in high material cost. The steps in handling, transport, artificial
ripening of fruits in wholesale market and their further transport to
required destinations, all lead to worsening the fruit conditions (Singh et
al., 2003).
Mango arrival hits the market from May to July every year and the
export of pulp has become jittery on account of changing market scenario.
Suitable methods for preparing product from mango pulp that has good
storage life are necessary to utilize mango gainfully and minimize the post
harvest losses (Janave et al., 2005).Various new kinds of processed
products are developed by constant research in India as well as in other
parts of the world to satisfy the consumer’s need (Krishnaveni et al., 1999).
Ready to eat fruit bars are well established products and are being
commercially prepared in our country from unmarketable but sound ripe
fruits. Traditionally, sun drying technique was employed for preparing
mango bar from ripe fruit pulp, but sun dried product is dark brown and
the process is unhygienic and lengthy due to coincidence of rainy season
with the ripening of mango fruits (Mir and Nath, 2000). Ready to eat mango
products have a vast market potential in addition to enhancing the farm
income.
Keeping in view all the above benefits of mango fruits and whey
protein concentrate, the present investigation was carried out with the
following objectives,
Drying study was conducted in batch type pilot scale solar dryer (80-
85kg) with open sun drying as control (Singh et al., 2006). The dryer was
2.0 m wide, with a 4.5m solar air heater and a drying tunnel of 8.0m. The
heater and dryer were covered with UV stabilized polyethylene film. Solar
photo voltaic operated axial flow fans were provided at one end to push fresh
air. The air flow through the dryer was 300-600m3/h.
Sixty five kg de-seeded blanched amla pieces were uniformly spread over
drying trays at the rate of 4.75 kg/m2. Initial moisture content of amla was
around 85per cent. Amla pieces were dried in tunnel in five and half days
as compared to 10 days in open sun drying. Moisture content in dried amla
reduced to 3.2per cent in tunnel dryer and 3.9per cent in open sun drying.
The quality of solar tunnel dried amla was found to be superior compared
to sun dried amla in terms of bacterial count, better appearance and
acceptability.
Khurdiya and Susanta (1986) compared the solar drier with chimney
effect and solar dryers developed by the authors for drying of fruits and
vegetables. The solar dryer with plain glass, followed by amber glass,
chimney and direct sun obtained the maximum temperature. They found
that the product dried in solar drier (chimney effect) had better retention of
sulphur dioxide and less changes in total sugars.
Hemakar et al., (2000) studied the blending of guava pulp with mango
pulp for dehydration (mango-guava sheet). Dried mango pulp or mango
sheet popularly called “Ampapar” which is an important product of
commerce in certain mango growing areas of India. However, the product
prepared by traditional method is far from satisfactory. The methods
employed by various workers to improve the quality of mango sheet, include
addition of sugar, citric acid, potassium metabisulphite and pectin etc. Use
of pectin in this preparation was, however, a costly proposition. Attempts
were made in this study to replace the use of pectin by addition of guava
pulp, which is not only a good source of natural pectin but of vitamin ‘C’.
Mango pulp blended with 5, 10, 15 and 20 per cent guava pulp and
maintaining the TSS at 250 Brix, acidity 0.5 per cent and sulphur dioxide
1000 ppm was dehydrated. Results showed that mango pulp with 20per
cent guava pulp gave a better sheet on drying followed by the one with 15per
cent guava pulp. The ideal moisture to have storage stability was found to
be in between 10 to 15 per cent with relative humidity of 65 to 75 percent.
0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 g/m2. The regression analysis was performed to
develop mathematical model using dehydration time, dehydration
temperature and tray load as independent variables and moisture content
as dependent variable. The R2 value (0.94) obtained for the model indicated
that it could be used to predict the plum pulp moisture content under
various dehydration conditions.
Similarly, the ascorbic acid content was higher in tent drier at 20.07
mg/100g as compared to sun dried of tomato 15.35 mg/100g. The moisture
content was higher in sun dried sample (19.6per cent) as compared to tent
drier (17.4per cent). The rehydration ratio was more in sun dried (4.02) as
compared to tent drier (3.43) but statistically nonsignificant. The dried
product was found to be more hygienic since the product was protected
from dust and flies.
Karabulut et al. (2007) studied the effect of air drying and sun drying
on color values and beta carotene content of apricot (Prunus america L.).
sulphurated and nonsulphurated apricots were used for drying at
temperatures of 50, 60, 70 and 800C. The time required to obtain desired
final dry matter in hot air drying was lower than sun drying. Sulphuration
also decreased drying time at all drying conditions. Color values and beta
carotene content in dried apricots at 70 and 800 C was 7.14, 7.17mg per
100g dry matter and 6.12, 6.48mg per 100g dry matter for sulphurated and
nonsulphurated apricots.
Mir and Nath (2000) studied the protein fortification of mango bar
using soy protein concentrate and coconut powder. Mango bar was
prepared by raising the total soluble solids (TSS) of pulp at 30 0 Brix with
powdered cane sugar adding 0.6per cent citric acid and drying in cabinet
drier at 630C for 14h. The plain mango bar contained 2.2per cent proteins
and 0.5 per cent ether extractives. Addition of 2two percent desiccated
coconut powder or 4.5per cent soy protein concentrate (SPC) to the pulp
raised the percentage of proteins and ether extractives in bar to 2.4 and 4.1,
and 11.8 and 0.3, respectively. Available lysine contents, in vitro protein
digestibility and food energy value of mango-SPC bar were 3.36 g/100g
proteins 83.1per cent and 296 Kcal/100g solids respectively. Addition of
SPC raised calcium, phosphorus and iron contents of mango bar.
Rao and Das (2003) studied the fuzzy logic based optimization of
ingredients for production of mango bar and its properties. Ingredients
selected for formulation of mango bar were commercial sucrose, milk
powder and maltodextrin. Sucrose was found to have greatest influence
compared to milk powder and maltodextrin, on hardness, chewiness and
yellow color of tray dried mango bar. Optimum feed mix composition, as
obtained through Fuzzy logic and expressed on the basis of mango solids
not sugar (MSNS) was: sucrose to MSNS=32.40, milk powder to MSNS=4
and maltodextrin to MSNS=4.5.
The mango varieties (pulp) selected for the present study were
‘Alphonso’ and ‘Totapuri’. Alphonso is a medium size fruit and the pulp is
orange yellow in color, which has good keeping quality. Totapuri is a
medium large fruit and the pulp is golden yellow in color having good
keeping quality mainly used for processing. These two varieties were
particularly selected for the present study because limited processing has
been done using these varieties and Totapuri fruits are usually used raw
and ripe, pulp was negligibly used.
Chemical analysis Shelf life study Cost of production Sensory evalu ation
Fig. 1 : Overall view of development of value added dehydrated mango products from mango pulp
3.2.1 Estimation of Moisture (AOAC, 1980)
Fresh samples of mango pulp was taken in a petri plates and dried in
an oven at 600 C for 12 hours. After ensuring that the weight of the dried
sample remained constant, the dried samples were weighed and this value
was subtracted from the fresh weight of the sample to obtain per cent
moisture
The total protein of pretreated oven dried mango pulps was estimated
as per cent total nitrogen by the micro-kjeldhal method. Total protein was
then approximated by multiplying the per cent nitrogen by the factor of 6.25
(Appendix II)
100g of sample was taken in a beaker and about 80ml water is added
and boiled for about an hour. Water loss during heating was replaced by
addition of water. Then cool and transfer it to 100ml volumetric flask.
Filtered the sample using whatman 4 filter paper and the filtrate was used
for titration against standard NaOH with phenolphthalein indicator.
Preparation of sample
Procedure
Filtering over sterile cotton pad (To be repeated till residue is colorless)
Sun drying
3.3.1 Hot air oven drying
Moisture content of the mango pulp during drying was estimated for
two varieties. Exactly 100grams of each variety of mango pulp was taken in
a pre weighed Petri dishes in triplicates and dried in hot air oven. Electronic
balance with 0.001g readability was used. Mass was recorded at intervals
for a period of twelve hours, at which drying was considered as complete.
Addition of sugar
Packed
Fresh curds
Fresh curds
Tie in muslin cloth for 24 hours to drain the
whey
Chakka
To assess the shelf life of the dried mango product the following
procedure was carried out.
The value added mango products were analyzed for the total bacterial
counts, yeast, moulds, Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli at 0 days, 30 days
and 60 days of storage study using Nutrient agar (NA) for bacteria, Martin’s
Rose Bengal Agar (MRBA) for mould count, Davis Agar for yeasts, EMB Agar
for E.coli and Bismuth sulphite (BS) for S. typhi following the standard plate
count method. 10-2, 10-3 and10-4 diluents were used for analyzing the
microbial load. The procedure followed in the microbial analysis is
presented in Appendix (VI).
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The physical parameters like color, consistency, pH, taste and tin
weight were determined for ‘Alphonso’ and ‘Totapuri’ varieties of mango
pulp.
Pulp color
The color of two varieties was observed visually and the observations
are presented in Table 1. Alphonso mango pulp was more orange yellow
when compared to Totapuri pulp which was golden yellow in color.
Pulp consistency
Taste
pH
The pH of the pulp was resolved using pH paper where both the
varieties had similar values of around 3.3-3.7.
The mango pulp of two varieties i.e Alphonso and Totapuri were
procured from ‘Mysore Fruit Product Pvt Ltd’ which was obtained in tins
had a total weight about 3.2kg as shown in Table 1.
Moisture
Protein
Titrable acidity
The variety Totapuri variety had higher acidity (0.46) per cent
compared to Alphonso (0.42) pulp. When analyzed statistically there was no
significant difference between the two varieties with respect to titrable
acidity.
Total sugars
Reducing sugars
The fiber content of mango pulps was estimated and the results
showed that Totapuri variety had higher percentage of 0.27g when
compared to Alphonso with 0.16g per cent. There was significant difference
between the varieties with respect to fiber as shown in Table 2 and in fig. 7.
The β-carotene content was estimated for two varieties of mango pulp
and it was observed that Alphonso variety had higher percentage (2.85mg
per cent) when compared to Totapuri pulp at 2.6 mg per cent. The statistical
results revealed that there is significant difference between the two varieties
with respect to β-carotene content (Table 3).
Vitamin C
Vitamin C was analyzed in two varieties of mango pulp and the results
showed that the Alphonso variety had higher percentage around 34.8 mg
per cent wherein the Totapuri variety had 16.45 mg per cent. The F-value
statistically indicated that there is a significant difference between the
vitamin C content of two varieties of mango pulp (Table 3).
CD
Proximates Alphonso Totapuri Fvalue SEM±
value
β-carotene
2.85 2.6 * 0.0190 0.0351
(mg per cent)
Vitamin C
34.8 16.45 * 1.0255 1.8896
(mg per cent)
7
8 2
6
8
moisture Protein (g%) 1.5
(%) 5
8
4 1
8
3
8 0.5
2
8 0
o ri Varities
varietie
s
1
6
15.
26. 9
35 15.
26. 8
3 15.
26. 7
TSS ( 15.
25
26. Brix) 6
15.
2 5
26. 15.
15 4
26. 15.
1 3
15.
26.
2 Alphon Totap
05
2 so uri
varieti
6 Alphon Totap es
varieti
so uri
es
0.
2
3
1
20. 0.2
8 5
20. 0.
6 2
Nonreduci
20. Fiber 0.1
ng
sugars 4 5
%
% 20. 0.
2 1
2 0.0
0 5
19. 0
8 Alphon Totap Alphon Totap
so uri so uri
varieti
varietie
es
s
varieties
35
30
25
20
Vitamin C (mg %)
15
10
5
0
Alphonso Totapuri
Varities
In oven drying, during the initial phase i.e. between 0 hours to three
hours, the moisture content in the drying mango pulp decreased rapidly for
both the varieties. At the end of three hours, the moisture content of
Alphonso was 19.9g/100g which was higher than the Totapuri
(18.6g/100g). During 3rd to 12th hour, the moisture content decreased
slowly. At the end of 12th hour, the moisture content of Alphonso was
3.98g/100g while Totapuri had 3.6g/100g (Table 4).
In sun drying, during the initial phase i.e. between o hours to two
hours, the moisture content decreased rapidly for both the varieties. After
the 3rd hour there was gradual decrease in the moisture content till the end
of 12 hours. The moisture content of Alphonso at the end of 12 th hour was
7.08g/100g and Totapuri had 6.45g/100g (Table 5).
Table 4 : Drying rate of mango varieties (oven drying)
Internal time Mean weight (g)
0 hr 100 100
0 hr 100 100
120
100
80
Alphonso
60
Totapuri
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Time (hours)
100
80
Alphonso
60
Totapuri
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Time (hours)
Ingredients Quantity
Alphonso Totapuri
Size (cm) 5 5
Number of bars 12 10
Mango Bar
Packaging
The Totapuri mango bar which was prepared using 10 per cent sugars
and three per cent WPC for 100 gram of pulp. The nutritive value of the final
dehydrated product found is shown in the table 8. The nutritive value of
mango bar was found to be high compared to the fresh and ripe mango pulp
which was considered as control. The total protein, fat, carbohydrate,
energy, β-carotene and vitamin C were 10.6 g, 4.79g, 193.03g, 688.08 Kcal,
2.85 mg per cent and 16 mg respectively.
β-carotene
Protein Fat Carbohydrate Energy Ascorbic
Ingredients (mg per
(g) (g) (g) (Kcal) acid (mg)
cent)
Alphonso Totapuri
Sensory
attributes
Shrikhand Shrikandwadi Shrikhand Shrikandwadi
F-value NS NS NS NS
Alphonso Totapuri
Sensory
attributes Oven dried Sun dried Oven dried Sun dried
F-value NS * * *
Moisture
Acidity
Titrable acidity of the dehydrated mango bar was estimated and the
results were tabulated in the table 11. The acidity content during the 1 st
month at zero days was 0.43 per cent and 0.49 per cent in Alphonso and
Totapuri respectively. The acidity after 60 days in Alphonso mango bar was
found to be 0.38 per cent in LDPE and 0.41 per cent in HDPE pouches.
Whereas in Totapuri mango bar, the acidity was 0.44 per cent in LDPE and
0.45 per cent in HDPE pouches.
Total sugars
As depicted in the table 11, the total sugars in Alphonso and Totapuri
at zero days were 67.1 per cent and 60.80 per cent respectively. There was
a slightly increase in the total sugars in both the varieties at 60 days in both
the packaging materials. Total sugar content in Alphonso was found to be
69.7 per cent and 68 per cent in LDPE and HDPE pouches and in Totapuri,
the content was 62.4 per cent and 60.99 per cent in LDPE and HDPE
pouches respectively after 60 days.
Reducing sugars
The reducing sugar content at zero days in Alphonso mango bar was
25.7 per cent which slightly increased after 60 days to 28.15 per cent and
26.3 per cent in LDPE and HDPE pouches respectively. Similarly in Totapuri
mango bar, there was a slight increase in the content from 19.9 per cent at
zero days to 21.9 per cent and 21.1 per cent respectively after 60 days.
Ascorbic acid
β-carotene
Total Reducing
Storage Acidity Ascorbic β-
Packaging Moisture sugars sugars Fiber
Varieties period ( per acid carotene
material (per cent) (per (per cent) (g)
(days) cent) (mg/100g) (mg/100g)
cent)
Alphonso
0 3.96 0.43 67.1 25.7 32.2 2.9 0.15
Totapuri
0 3.65 0.49 60.8 20.0 16.0 2.6 2.65
The mango bar prepared from two varieties of mango viz., Alphonso
and Totapuri pulp were subjected to sensory evaluation during the storage
period at regular intervals at 0, 30 and 60 days. The evaluated scores are
depicted in the Table 12 for Alphonso bar and in Table 13 for Totapuri bar.
The sensory scores were compared between the two different packaging
materials viz., LDPE (Low Density Polyethylene) and HDPE (High Density
Polyethylene) pouches.
Overall
Color Appearance Taste Texture Flavor acceptability
Days of
storage Packaging material
LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG
0 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6
30 3.6 3.7 2.9 3.0 3.4 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.4 3.4 3.1 3.2
60 2.7 2.2 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.9 2.5 2.5 2.9 3.4 2.6 3.2
Mean 3.3 3.16 3.0 3.16 3.36 3.56 2.9 2.8 3.36 3.53 3.1 3.33
F-value NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Column
CD 0.3793 0.4646 0.4290 0.5255 0.425 0.5205 0.4494 0.5504 0.4416 0.5408 0.340 0.4164
CD at 5
per cent 0.6570 0.7431 0.7361 0.7783 0.7648 0.5889
* Significant at 0.05 per cent level NS: Non-significant LG: Low gauge HG: High gauge
Table 13 : Organoleptic evaluation of Totapuri mango bar on storage at different intervals (oven dried)
Overall
Color Appearance Taste Texture Flavor acceptability
Days of storage Packaging material
LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG LG HG
0 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.4 4.4
30 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.8 4.4 3.5 4.5 3.9
60 4.6 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.5 4.3 4.0 4.2 4.0
Mean 4.6 4.53 4.46 4.36 4.4 4.1 3.76 3.7 4.2 3.8 4.36 4.1
F-value NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Column CD 0.296 0.362 0.298 0.365 0.356 0.436 0.379 0.465 0.336 0.412 0.297 0.364
Microbial load in the developed value added mango bar was evaluated
for bacteria, yeast, mould, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi using the
dilution plate count technique using respective agar media.
The evaluated scores are enumerated in the Table 14 and 15 for Alphonso and
Totapuri mango bars respectively.
Yeast counts during the 0 days were found to be nil in both the
packaging materials viz., LDPE and HDPE pouches. After 30 days interval,
there was slight growth in the product stored in LDPE pouch which was
found to be 2.52×103 cfu/g. at 60 days interval, there was growth of yeast
colonies in the product stored in both the pouches and the counts were
found to be 3.0×103 cfu/g and 2.52×103 cfu/g in LDPE and HDPE pouches
respectively.
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi counts were found to be absent in both
the types of pouches and at all intervals of storage.
4.7.2.2 Microbial load in Totapuri mango bar
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi counts were found to be absent in both
the types of pouches and at all intervals of storage.
Days 0 30 60
Microorganisms LG HG LG HG LG HG
Yeast Nil Nil 2.52 Nil 3.00 2.52
Days 0 30 60
Microorganisms LG HG LG HG LG HG
A B
V. DISCUSSION
Moisture content
Chauhan et al. (1997) has reported that the moisture content in pulp
was 87.2 per cent in Dashehari mango variety. In the present study, the
values were similar where the Alphonso pulp contained 89 per cent and
Totapuri had 84 per cent.
Protein
Titrable acidity
Total sugars
Sagar and Khurdiya (1996) reported that the total sugar content of
Dashehari pulp ranged between 18 to 18.2 percent. Mir and Nath (2000)
reported that the sugar content was 17.2 in Langra variety. In the present
study it was found to be 26.3 and 26.1 percent in Alphonso and Totapuri
pulp respectively wherein the Alphonso being sweeter with high sugar
content than Totapuri pulp.
Reducing sugars
Mir and Nath (2000) reported that the Langra variety contained 3.0
percent of reducing sugars. Sagar and Khurdiya (1996) reported that the
reducing content of Dashehari variety was 13.85 percent. In the present
study the reducing sugar content was found to be 6.06 and 5.16 in
Alphonso and Totapuri respectively which indicates the higher sugar
content of Alphonso when compared to Totapuri.
In the present study the non reducing sugar content was found to be
20.24 and 20.94 percent in Alphonso and Totapuri pulp respectively.
Crude Fiber
Singh et al. (2003) reported that the fiber content of Neelum variety was
0.61 percent. In the present study, the fiber content was 0.27 and
β-carotene
Mir and Nath (2000) reported that the Langra variety contained 1.4 mg
percent. In the present study the β-carotene content was found to be
2.85 and 2.6 mg percent in Alphonso and Totapuri pulp respectively.
Vitamin C
In the present study, the time taken for dehydration of mango pulp
in oven was 12 hours where the moisture content reduced from 89 and 84
per cent to 3.98 and 3.6 per cent in Alphonso and Totapuri pulp
respectively. In sun drying the moisture content of Alphonso and Totapuri
decreased to 7.08 and 6.45 per cent in 12 hours of time respectively. The
sun drying required more time due to the fluctuations in weather and
sunlight where in there was a constant flow of electricity in oven drying.
Mir and Nath (2000) reported that protein fortified mango bar can be
prepared by incorporating soy protein concentrate and coconut powder.
Chauhan et al. (1997) also prepared the protein rich mango bar using soy
slurry. In the present study, protein rich value added mango bar was
prepared by incorporating three per cent whey protein concentrate (WPC).
Chauhan et al. (1997) reported that the mango bar prepared using
soy slurry contained 8.85 percent protein, 60 mg vitamin C, 1.9 percent fat,
265.5g carbohydrates and 308.45Kcal energy. In the present study, the
total protein, fat, carbohydrate, energy, β-carotene and vitamin C of the
mango bar was 10.6 g, 4.79g, 193.03g, 688.08 Kcal, 2.85 mg% and 16mg
respectively.
Protein rich mango bar prepared by incorporating soy slurry and the
product was subjected for sensory evaluation under average hedonic scale
ratings. The color and appearance had no significant difference between the
combinations. The other attributes also had least difference and did not
show any significant difference (Singh et al., 2003).
In the present study, mango bar was prepared using whey protein
concentrate (WPC) through dehydration process was evaluated. The product
was acceptable by the panel of ten judges. The product prepared under oven
drying was highly acceptable compared to sun dried product. Sun dried
product was sticky in consistency and the color was dark brown compared
to oven dried mango bar.
The oven dried Totapuri mango bar was found to be highly acceptable
in terms of taste, color and appearance compared to Alphonso mango bar
although Alphonso scored high in terms of nutritional attributes, probably
because of high fiber and high acidity of Totapuri mango.
Mango bar prepared and compared with guava bar during storage for
two months in different packaging materials. Organoleptic evaluation was
conducted at 60th day of storage. The sensory scores were found to be
acceptable and there was no significant difference reported in the study
made by Vijayanand et al., 2000.
Mango bar prepared was stored in three types of packaging materials
for two months. The color of the bar was slightly darkened but the changes
were of lower magnitude as reported by Singh et al., 1997.
Chauhan et al. (1997) reported that the mango bar packed in LDPE
was better compared to aluminium foil and wax paper and stored for two
months. The microbial load was observed to be less in LDPE pouches. In
the present study, the mango bar which has longer storage life of two
months was selected for microbial study for two months. The microbial load
was higher in LDPE pouches compared to HDPE pouches and hence the
HDPE pouches were found to be better suited for packing the mango bar
for better storage life. LDPE pouches were found to have high moisture
than the HDPE pouches after two months.
The bacterial counts, yeasts and moulds were observed in both the
packages but comparatively less count were observed in HDPE pouches
whereas the Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi counts were found to be
nil in both the packages as the packaging was done under semi sterilized
condition.
In the present study, the cost of Alphonso and Totapuri mango bar
was calculated and it was found that the cost of production for 100g
Totapuri mango bar is less compared to Alphonso mango bar as the cost of
pulp of Alphonso variety is double the cost of Totapuri mango pulp. So the
price of production of mango bar from Alphonso was Rs. 23/100g and that
of Totapuri was Rs.17.4/100g bar. Hence the low cost Totapuri pulp can be
utilized to develop mango bar at house hold level especially for women
empowerment.
SUMMARY
VI. SUMMARY
Transforming mango pulp into fruit bar is one of the several ways to
utilize mango fruit bar as nutritional product, with chewy texture similar to
dried raisins and is a good source of dietary fiber and natural sugars.
• Mango pulp of two varieties selected for the study differed physically
in color, consistency and taste. Alphonso pulp was orange yellow,
sweet taste and thick consistency. Totapuri pulp was golden yellow
with sour taste and thin consistency.
REFERENCES
VII. REFERENCES
ASIT, S. AND BHATIA, K.L., 1999, Functional properties of whey protein concentrate- A
review. J. Dairying Foods Home Sci., 18: 141-154.
CHAUHAN, S.K., LAL, B.B., AND JOSHI, V.K., 1997, Preparation and
evaluation of protein enriched mango fruit bar. Indian Food Packer,
pp.5-8.
DEWANTO, V., WU, X., ADOM, K.K. AND LIU, R.H., 2002, Thermal
processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing
total antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50(10): 3010-3014.
DWIVEDI, H.D. AND SHAFI, M., 2005, Solar dehydration of tomato in the
cold arid region of Ladakh. Progressive Horticulture, 37(2): 349352.
HARJOT, S., SODHI, S.N. AND GILL, S.B., 2002, Studies on Dehydration Kinetics of
Mango Pulp. Indian Food Packer, pp.54-56.
HIWALE, S.S. AND SINGH, S.P., 2006, Effect of chemical treatments and storage
period on shelf life of aonla. Indian Food Packer, pp.52-74.
HUFFMAN, L.M., 1996, Processing whey protein for use as a food ingredient. Food
Technol , 50(2): 49-52.
HYMAVATHI, T.V. AND KHADER VIJAYA., 2004 (b), Storage stability of the
Vacuum Dehydrated Ripe Mango-Mix Powders. J. of Food Sci.
Technol , 41(5):521-524.
JAIN VIJAY, B.L, TIWARY, H.G., SHARMA. AND SAXENA, R.R., 1996,
Evaluation of late maturing mango varieties for the preparation of
beverages as nectar and RTS. Indian Food Packer, pp.9-14.
KALRA, S.K. AND BHARADWAJ, K.C., 1981, Use of simple solar dehydrator
for drying fruit and vegetable products. J. Food Sci. Technol, 18(1):
23-26.
KHURDIYA, D.S. AND SUSANTA, K.R., 1986, Solar drying of fruits and vegetables.
Indian Food Packer, 40(3): 28-39
KOMES DRAZENKA., LOVRIC TOMISLAV. AND GANIC.K.KARIN., 2007,
Aroma of dehydrated pear products. J. Food Sci. Technol, 40: 1578-
1586.
LAVELLI, V., HIPPELI, S., DORNISH, K., PERI, C. AND ELSTINER, E.F.,
2001, Properties of tomato powders as additives for food fortification
and stabilization. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49(4):20372042.
MANDHAR, S.C. AND KUMARAN SENTHIL, S., 1999, Innovations in raw mango
processing. Indian Food Packer, pp.43-48.
MAYUMDAR, A.S. AND GRABOWSKI, S., 1991, Solar assisted osmotic dehydration.
Research report. Department of Chemical
Engineering, Mcgill University, Montreal, Canada.
MIR, M.A. AND NATH, N., 2000, Protein fortification of mango bar using soy
protein concentrate and coconut powder. J. Food Sci. Technol, 37(5):
525-528.
MITTAL, S., GILL.S., BALMEET. AND SODHI, S.N., 2003, Dehydration characteristics of
plum pulp. J. Food Sci. Technol, 40(2): 228-229.
PANT, K., DHAWAN, S.S., GOYAL, R.K. AND DHAWAN., 2004, Effect of pre-
drying treatments on nutritional quality of Aonla. Indian Food
Packer, pp.67-70.
RANGANNA, S., 2002, Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits
and vegetable products. Tata Mc. Graw Hill Pub.Co.Ltd., New
Delhi.pp.84-91
RAO, P.K. AND DAS, H., 2003, Fuzzy logic based optimization of ingredients
for production of mango bar and its properties. J. Food Sci. Technol,
40(6): 576-581.
SAGAR, V.R. AND KUMAR., 2006, Preparation and storage study of ready
to eat dehydrated gooseberry shreds. J. Food Sci. Technol, 43(4):
349-352.
SAGAR, V.S. AND KHURDIYA, D.S., 1998, Improved products from ripe mango.
Indian Food Packer, pp. 27-31.
SAGAR, V.S. AND KHURDIYA, D.S., 1999, Studies on Dehydration of Dashehari Mango
Slices. Indian Food Packer, pp.5-7.
SAHU, C., PATEL, S. AND CHOUDARY, P.L., 2005, Technology for
Manufacture of Whey based Mango-herbal (lemongrass) Beverage.
J. Food Sci. Technol, 42(5): 421-424.
SANDHU, K.S. AND PARHAWK, B., 2004, Recent developments in the dehydration of
potato. Indian Food Packer, pp. 67-77.
SINGH, M., SHIVHARE, U.S., SINGH, H. AND BAWA, A.S., 1999, Osmotic
concentration kinetics of Amla preserve. Indian Food Packer, pp.13-
22.
SINGH, P.L, GANESHAN, S. AND SINGH S., 2006, Drying study of Amla in
solar tunnel dryer. Indian Food Packer, pp. 47-51.
SINGH, R., DASHORA, L.K. AND UPADHYAY, B., 2006, Effect of predrying
treatments and drying methods on physico-nutritional quality of
dehydrated aonla shreds. Indian Food Packer, pp.57-64.
SINGH, S.S., TOMAR, M.C. AND SINGH, U.B., 1999, Preparation and
storage studies on raw mango pana concentrate. Indian Food
Packer, pp.63-66.
SUDEER, K.P. AND DASH, S.K., 1999, Osmo-solar dehydration of fruits and
vegetables-An overview. J. Indian Food Packer, pp.28-37.
SURINDER, H., NAVDEEP, S.S. AND BALMEET, S.G., 2002, Studies on Dehydration
Kinetics of Mango Pulp. Indian Food Packer, pp.54-
56.
ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE-I
Score system:
Preference Score
Very good 5
Good 4
Slightly good 3
Fair 2
Poor 1
Attributes Scores
A B C D E F
Color
Appearance
Taste
Texture
Flavor
Overall
acceptability
Titration: The green colored boric acid was titrated against the 0.1N HCL
until its color turned to pink. A blank was run simultaneously. The titre
values obtained were incorporated in the equation below to obtain the
percent nitrogen present in the sample which, in turn, was multiplied by
the factor 6.25 to obtain the percent protein.
V1 100 14
Percent nitrogen (%N) = (VA-VB) × ------ × ------
V2 W
Where:
VA = Titre value of sample
% protein = % N × 6.25
ANNEXURE-III
Estimation of crude fiber Principle
During the acid subsequent alkali treatments, oxidative hydrolytic
degradation of the native cellulose and considerable degradation of lignin
occurs. The residue obtained after final filtration is weighed, incinerated,
cooled and weighed again. The loss in weight is the crude fiber content.
Method
1. Two g of dry fat-free sample previously extracted with petroleum ether was
boiled with 1.25 % of H2SO4 for 30 minutes with the help of bumping chips.
2. Thereafter, the mixture was filtered through a muslin cloth and then washed
with boiling water until the residue was free of acid.
3. The residue was then boiled with 1.25 % NaOH solution for 20 minutes.
4. Again, the mixture was filtered through a muslin cloth. But this time, was
washed with 25 ml of boiling sulphuric acid, three portions of water and 25ml
of alcohol.
5. The residue was then transferred to a pre-weighed ashing dish (W1g).
6. Thereafter, it was dried for 2 hours at 130± 20C, cooled in a dessicator AND
then weighed (W2g).
7. The dry dishes containing the sample were then ignited for 3 hours at 600 ±
150C.
8. Finally, the sample was cooled in a dessicator and then weighed again
(W3g).
Calculation
Loss in weight on ignition
Percent crude fiber = ------------------------------- × [100-moisture%-Fat%]
Weight of sample used [(g) (moisture & fat free)]
(W-Wg) – (W2-W3)
= ----------------------------------------- ×100
Weight of the sample used (g) W1
ANNEXURE-IV
ANNEXURE-V
STANDERD CURVE
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.46
0.4 0.4
0.33
0.3
0.27
0.2 0.21
0.14
0.1
0.07
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8
Concentration of B-carotene
ANNEXURE-VI
K2HPO4 13.5g
Agar 2g
Eosine Y 0.4g
Methylene blue 0.07g
Distilled water 1000ml
pH 7.2