By Regd Post with Ack-due

Kadapa,
26-06-2018.

From:-
Sri.K.Venkata Reddy B.Com., B.L
Advocate
Door No:-2/476 Nagarajupet,
Kadapa city post and District.

To:-
Kommuru Tandava Krishana Reddy
S/o. Chinna Venkata Reddy,
Obulavaripalle Town Post & Mandal,
Kadapa District.
PIN 516108

Sir
Sub:- Legal notice clarifying that you have no right or authority
over the property of murdered Kommuru Yasodamma and her
husband Chinna Narasa Reddy alias Narasa Reddy and that my client,
his sons and daughters are legal representative of Yasodamma and
her husband Chinna Narasa Reddy alias Narasa Reddy – Rg.
***
Under the instructions and on behalf of my client Sri. Kommuru
Sidda Reddy son of late Pedda Venkata Reddy aged about 76 years senior
citizen residing at Obulvaripalle Town Post & Mandal, Kadapa District, I
herely issue this legal notice to you with the following facts.
1. My client submits that you and Ramachandra Reddy
manufactured a will dated 05-08-1981 by forging the signature of Narasa
Reddy for 27 items of property of Yosodamma and her husband Chinna
Narasa Reddy for knocking away their property of 27 items. Later
Yasodamma filed O.S No. 18/1989 in Senior Civil Judge Court of
Rajampeta against you and Ramachandra Reddy. You both filed your
written statement by filing your forged will dated 05-08-1981 by
engaging your advocate Sri.S.Ravindra. The Honourable Senior Civil Judge
of Rajampeta pronnounced Judgment in O.S No. 18/1989 on 23-08-2000
by dismissing your claim and declaring the right and title of Yasodamma
over that 27 items of property. So you and Ramachandra Reddy have no
right or authority over the property of Yasodamma and her husband.
 :: 2 ::
2. Further you both filed E.P No. 40/2008 in O.S No.18/1989 for
alleged partition of those 27 items of property claiming half share right in
that property by allotting half share property in that property. The
Honourable Senior Civil Judge Court Rajampeta dismissed your E.P No.
40/2008 on 21-10-2009 by holding that you have no right or authority to
pray for division and allotment half share to you both in 27 items of
property. This is second order of the court by holding that you have no
right or authority over 27 items of property of Yasodamma and her
husband.
3. You are coming very often against the interest of my client by
claiming your alleged rights over the property of Yasodamma and her
husband. You stated in the reply notice that you are the absolute owner
of shop room property leased out to T.Mahesh and that you are receiving
the rent of thousand P.M from the that T.Mahesh even though my client
is the absolute owner of that property and 27 item of property.
4. The Junior paternal mother (Chinnamma) aunt named
Yasodamma brought my client and his children to her house about 20
years ago and brought them in her house as her legal representation for
her property. My client is the Sakudu Koduku of Yasodamma since
Yasodamma voluntarily with 100% interest as her sakudu Koduku for
inheriting her properties. Hence my client and his sons and daughters are
legal representatives for the property of Yasodamma and her husband.
My client is in Possession and enjoyment of all the properties of
Yasodamma after her murder on 07-05-2014. Now you are trying to claim
your alleged rights over the property of Yasodamma even though you lost
your rights on 23-08-2000 and on 21-10-2009 by virtue of Judgment,
decree and order of Senior Civil Judge Court of Rajampeta.
5. Therefore please take this legal notice and that you should
not try to claim you alleged right over the property of Yasodamma which
property has been in possession and enjoyment of my client as absolute
owner after the murder of Yasodamma on 07-05-2017. Otherwise my
client is forced to take appropriate Civil and Criminal steps against you as
per the provisions of law by holding you liable for costs and
consequences.

Advocate