INTRODUCTION
127
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
The analysis scheme of the one dimensional consolidation of soft ground with
impeded boundaries under depth-dependent ramp load is shown in Fig. 1. As shown,
h=the thickness of the soft ground; kv=the vertical coefficient of permeability; mv=the
coefficient of volume compressibility; cv=kv/(mvhJw), the coefficient of consolidation;
Jw =the unit weight of water. There are two impeded layers on and under the soft
ground, respectively. Impeded layers are used to describe partially drained boundaries,
which cannot be compressed but satisfy Darcy’s law. Lt, Lb, kt, and kb are the thickness
and the permeability coefficients of impeded layers on the top and at the bottom,
respectively. The z-axis is perpendicular to the surface of the layers with the coordinate
origin at the top of the soft ground, pointing downwards in the positive direction. The
vertical total stress is depth-dependent and time-varying, and it is assumed to satisfy
§ V1 V 0 ·
V z, t ¨ V 0 z ¸ q t (1)
© h ¹
where q(t) is a function of time. V0 and V1 are the vertical total stress increases when
q(t)=1 at z=0 and z=h respectively. When t is less than tc, q(t)=t/tc; otherwise q(t)=1.
The loading period is tc.
All of the assumptions in Terzaghi's basic one dimensional consolidation theory are
retained except for the boundaries and vertical total stress. The differential governing
equation for the consolidation of the soft ground can be obtained as follows:
wu w 2u wV
cv (2)
wt wz 2 wt
where u is the excess pore water pressure in the soft ground, and t and z are the
variables of time and space, respectively.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
The boundary conditions in the top and bottom of the soft ground are as follows:
wu Rt
° wz u
° z 0 h
® (3)
° wu R
bu
¯° wz z h h
where Rt= kt hh/( kv hLt), Rb= kb hh/( kv hLb).
SOLUTIONS
Using the method of separation of variables, the solution of equation (2) becomes
f
u ¦ T t Z z
m 1
m m (4)
where Am and Om are the coefficients to be found out. Substituting Eq. (5) into Eq. (4),
then substituting the result into Eq. (3), Am and Om can be obtained
Om h
° Am Rt
°
® (6)
° ªO h Rt Rb º sin O h Rt Rb cos Om h
° «¬ m Om h »¼ m
¯
Eq. (2) can be assumed as follows by introducing a Fourier series and substituting
Eq. (1) and Eq. (4) into Eq. (2)
Dm 1
° t tc
[ m t ® Qm tc (8)
°0 t t tc
¯
where, ,
h ª V V0 º
Dm ³ Z m z «V 0 1 z » dz
h
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
0
¬ ¼
V 0 V1 V 0 1 ª hV V V 0 1 º ªV V 0 1 V1 º
sin Om h « 1 1 2 »
cos Om h « 1 »
Om Rt Om ¬ tR h Om ¼ ¬ Rt Om Om ¼
2
h h ª § Om h · 1º 1 ª§ O h · 2 º h
Qm ³ Z m2 z dz «1 ¨ ¸ » «¨ m ¸ 1» sin 2Om h cos 2Om h
0 2 « © Rt ¹ Rt » 4Om «¬© Rt ¹ »¼ 2 Rt
¬ ¼
Tm(t) can be obtained by solving the ordinary differential equation Eq. (7)
Dm 1 2
ª1 e cv Omt º
°Q t c O2 t tc
° m c v m ¬ ¼
Tm t ® (9)
° Dm 1 2
ªe cv Om t tc e cv Om2 t º t t tc
°̄ Qm tc cv Om2 ¬ ¼
Thus, the solution of excess pore water pressure of the consolidation problem is
obtained and can be represented as follows:
f Dm 1 2
ª1 e cv Omt º
°¦ ª¬sin Om z Am cos Om z º¼ Q t c O 2 ¬ ¼
t tc
°m 1 m c v m
u ® f (10)
° ªsin O z A cos O z º Dm 1 2
ªe cv Om t tc e cv Om2 t º
°¯¦ ¬ m m m ¼ Q t c O2 t t tc
m 1 m c v m
¬ ¼
t f Em Dm 1 ª cv Om2 t º
h
° t ¦ Q t c O 2 ¬1 e t tc
U t
³0 ª¬V z, t u z, t º¼ dz °c m1 m c v m
® f
¼
(11)
h§ V V · °1 Em Dm 1 ªe cv Om2 t tc e cv Om2 t º
³0 ¨© V 0 1 h 0 z ¸¹ dz °¯ ¦ m 1 Qm tc cv Om2 ¬ ¼
t t tc
2 ª 1 sin Om h cos Om h º
where, Em « »
V 1 V 0 ¬ Om h Rt Om h ¼
Rt=f and Rb=0. The boundary conditions become pervious top and pervious bottom
(PTPB) when Rt=f and Rb=f. These two cases are the special cases studied by Zhu
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
(1999). The comparisons of the average consolidation degree under V0=100kPa and
V1=50kPa by the present analytical solution and Zhu's solution are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 shows that there is no difference between the results calculated by the present
analytical solution and Zhu's solution.
0.9
0.8
0.7
Average consolidation degree
0.6
0.5
Present solution (PTIB)
Zhu's solution (PTIB)
0.4 Present solution (PTPB)
Zhu's solution (PTPB)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-2 -1 0 1
10 10 10 10
Tv
Fig. 3 shows the curves of the average consolidation degree of U(t) vs. time factor Tv=
cv t/h2 corresponding to different values of Rt and Rb when V0=V1=100kPa. It can be
seen that the values of Rt and Rb have great influence on the average consolidation
degree. When either Rt or Rb remains unchanged, the greater the changed value is, the
greater the average consolidation degree will be. The curve of average consolidation
degree obtained when Rt=100 almost coincides with the curve obtained when Rt=f. It
corresponds to the completely permeable boundary when Rt=f. Therefore, this case
has similar conclusions with the ones under instantly applied load (Xie, 1999).
Rb=0 Rb=5
0 0
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
10 10
20 20 Rt=
Average consolidation degree (%)
60 60
Rt=20 Rt=10
70 70
Rt=10
Rt=5
80 Rt=5 80
Rt=2
Rt=2
90 90 Rt=1
Rt=1
100 100
-2 -1 0 -2 -1 0
10 10 10 10 10 10
Tc Tc
Three types of distribution patterns of total stress increment along depth are often
encountered in engineering: 1) rectangular pattern; 2) trapezoidal pattern (V0<V1); and
3) inverse trapezoidal pattern (V0>V1). Fig. 4 shows the influence of impeded
boundaries on average consolidation degree under different types of distribution
patterns of total stress increment along depth. The stress distribution is shown in Table
1. It can be seen that the average degree of consolidation of inverse trapezoidal stress
pattern is the maximum and that the average degree of consolidation of trapezoidal
stress pattern is the minimum. The differences of the average consolidation degree
among the three patterns of total stress increment are more obvious with the increase of
impeded parameters Rt at the initial stage of consolidation.
0
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
10
Rectangular
Rt=2,Rb=0
20 Inverse Trapezoidal
Average consolidation degree (%)
Trapezoidal
30 Rectangular
Inverse Trapezoidal
40
Trapezoidal
50
60
70 Rt=100,Rb=0
80
90
100
-2 -1 0
10 10 10
Tc
CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents the analysis for the consolidation of soft ground with impeded
boundaries under a depth-dependent ramp vertical total stress and a variety of solutions
are obtained for one dimensional soil consolidation under different boundary
conditions. A computational program has been developed based on the analytical
solutions. Both the drainage boundary conditions and total stress increment pattern
have a great influence on the consolidation process. The differences become more
obvious with the increase of impeded parameters Rt at the initial stage of consolidation.
REFERENCES
Alonso, E.E., Krizek, R.J. (1974). "Randomness of settlement rate under stochastic
load." Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 100 (6): 1211 -
1226.
Cai, Y.Q., Liang, X. and Wu, S.M. (2004). "One-dimensional consolidation of layered
soils with impeded boundaries under time-dependent loadings." Applied
Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 25 (8): 937-944.
Gray H. (1945). "Simultaneous consolidation of contiguous layers of unlike
compressible soils." Transactions, ASCE, 110: 1327 - 1356.
Lei, G.H., Jiang, C.X. and Shi, J.Y. (2006). "Equal strain solutions of radial and
vertical coupled consolidation by vertical drains under arbitrarily distributed ground
soil stress increase." Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 27 (2): 173 - 178. (in Chinese)
Liu, J.C., Lei, G.G. and Wang, Y.X. (2011). "One-dimensional consolidation of soft
ground considering non-Darcy flows." Chinese Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, Vol. 33 (7): 1117-1122. (in Chinese)
Schiffman, R.L., Stein, J.R. (1970). "One-dimensional consolidation of layered
systems." Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 96
(4): 1499 - 1504.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Universidad de Costa Rica on 01/26/19. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Xie, K.H., Xie, X.Y. and Gao, X. (1999). "Theory of one dimensional consolidation of
two- layered soil with partially drained boundaries." Computers and Geotechnics,
Vol. 24 (4): 265-278.
Zhu, G.F., and Yin, J.H. (1999). "Consolidation of double soil layers under
depth-dependent ramp load." Glotechnique, Vol. 49 (3): 415-421.