0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
11 tayangan1 halaman
Emergency circumstances requiring timeliness, such as when millions of lives are at peril, may outweigh the probable unconstitutionality of torture according to the document. While torture is normally not justified as punishment for a past event or to extort confessions, the document argues that saving lives could potentially justify torture in rare situations.
Emergency circumstances requiring timeliness, such as when millions of lives are at peril, may outweigh the probable unconstitutionality of torture according to the document. While torture is normally not justified as punishment for a past event or to extort confessions, the document argues that saving lives could potentially justify torture in rare situations.
Emergency circumstances requiring timeliness, such as when millions of lives are at peril, may outweigh the probable unconstitutionality of torture according to the document. While torture is normally not justified as punishment for a past event or to extort confessions, the document argues that saving lives could potentially justify torture in rare situations.
2. Emergency circumstances unconstitutional 8. millions of lives at peril
1. Due process takes require timeliness outweigh constitutionality too much time 10. torture is not justified in 4. punishment is for extort confessions or a past event 9. millions of lives at peril outweigh recantations 5. torture is not the probable unconstitutionality 11. saving lives is not extort 3. due process is not applicable for a past event of torture confessions or recantations to emergency circumstances where torture is not justified 6. torture is not punishment 12. torture is justified in saving lives