Miscellaneous Agents
Daniel Morgensztern, MD, and Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD
S390 Copyright © 2012 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic Oncology • Volume 7, Number 12, Supplement 5, December 2012 Santa Monica Supplement
tyrosine 705 is regulated by several modulators including in OS between chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel) with
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Janus-activated or without apricoxib. The tumor expression of COX-2 was a
kinases (JAK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), predictor for benefit from the addition of celecoxib to chemo-
and Src. Activated STAT-3 undergoes dimerization and trans- therapy in the Cancer and Leukemia B Group (CALGB) but
location to the nucleus where it binds to STAT-responsive not in the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Artsen Longziekten
elements in the promoter of target genes leading to carcino- en Tuberculose (NVALT-4). The CALB 30801 is currently
genesis, proliferation, suppression of apoptosis, angiogenesis, randomizing patients with immunohistochemistry COX-2
metastases, and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. index of 2 or higher to first-line chemotherapy with or without
Cancer cells with activating EGFR mutations may mediate celecoxib.
some of their downstream effects through STAT-3. Activated
STAT-3 (nuclear pSTAT-3) is expressed in approximately 55% CAMP RESPONSE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN
of NSCLC tumors, being more common in adenocarcinomas The cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)
and light smokers.5 is activated by hormones, retinoids, growth factors, and
Dr. Sequist presented the early findings of a phase I cytokines, and has a significant role in cellular growth, pro-
study evaluating OPB51602 in patients with advanced cancer. liferation, and survival. Dr. Koo reviewed the data on CREB
This drug inhibits the phosphorylation of STAT-3, preventing in NSCLC, describing that this transcription factor is over-
its activation and translocation to the nucleus. The primary expressed and active in NSCLC cell lines; phosphorylated
objective was safety, and one patient with NSCLC achieved CREB is associated with worse survival in NSCLC patients,
partial response (PR) at the dose of 5 mg daily. and inhibition of CREB suppresses the growth of NSCLC cell
lines both in vitro and in vivo.
APRICOXIB
Cyclooxigenase-2 (COX-2) is induced by tobacco car- CYCLINS INHIBITION BY RETINOIDS
cinogens and epidemiological studies have suggested that There are two known families of retinoid receptors,
individuals who routinely use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory the retinoid acid receptors and the retinoid X receptors, with
drugs have decreased risk of lung cancer. Overexpression of the former endogenously activated by both all-trans-retinoid
COX-2 is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC, and acid (RA) and 9-cis-RA, and the latter only by 9-cis-RA.
COX-2 inhibitors have shown preclinical antitumor efficacy Bexarotene is an oral synthetic retinoid that binds specifically
both as single agents and in combination with EGFR inhibi- to retinoid X receptors.
tors. One of the mechanisms for the synergy with EGFR Dr. Dmitrovsky presented the data on targeting cyclins
inhibitors is the promotion of epithelial to mesenchymal with the combination of bexarotene and erlotinib. Both drugs
transition by prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2), causing resistance to can suppress cyclin D1, which has much higher levels in
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Urinary levels of the stable EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines than in wild type. In a phase
metabolite of PGE2 (PGE-M) correlates with intratumoral II trial,7 among the 19 evaluable patients treated with the com-
PGE2 levels, and the levels decrease with COX-2 inhibition. bination of bexarotene and erlotinib, three patients achieved
Because patients with suppressed PGE-M have superior out- PR and six patients had SD.
come, this molecule may represent a potential biomarker for
COX-2 dependent disease and response to COX-2 inhibition.
In a phase I study, the combination of apricoxib and erlotinib REFERENCES
in patients with advanced NSCLC was well tolerated, with a 1. Gerber DE, Stopeck AT, Wong L, et al. Phase I safety and pharmaco-
kinetic study of bavituximab, a chimeric phosphatidylserine-targeting
disease control rate of 60% among the 27 enrolled patients (1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin
PR and 11 SD).6 PGE-M was reduced in 70% of patients and Cancer Res 2011;17:6888–6896.
among the 17 patients with elevated baseline PGE-M, 11 had 2. Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomerase: a target for cancer therapeutics.
clinical benefit. Cancer Cell 2002;2:257–265.
Dr. Edelman presented the updated results of the 3. Johnson FM, Bekele BN, Feng L, et al. Phase II study of dasatinib
in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol
Apricoxib with Tarceva in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer 2010;28:4609–4615.
(APRiCOT-L) study, in which patients with previously treated 4. Hammerman PS, Sos ML, Ramos AH, et al. Mutations in the DDR2
advanced stage NSCLC were randomized to erlotinib alone at kinase gene identify a novel therapeutic target in squamous cell lung can-
150 mg daily or in combination with apricoxib 400 mg daily. cer. Cancer Discov 2011;1:78–89.
5. Lai SY, Johnson FM. Defining the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in head
The primary endpoint was time to progression. Although and neck and thoracic malignancies: implications for future therapeutic
there were no differences in outcomes between the arms for approaches. Drug Resist Updat 2010;13:67–78.
the entire cohort of patients, there was a small but statistically 6. Reckamp K, Gitlitz B, Chen LC, et al. Biomarker-based phase I dose-
significant benefit from the doublet in patients younger than escalation, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of oral apri-
65 years, with improved time to progression from 1.4 to 2.7 coxib in combination with erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung
cancer. Cancer 2011;117:809–818.
months (p = 0.018) and median OS from 3.8 to 8.5 months 7. Dragnev KH, Ma T, Cyrus J, et al. Bexarotene plus erlotinib suppress lung
(p = 0.025). In contrast, the University of Maryland carcinogenesis independent of KRAS mutations in two clinical trials and
Greenbaum Cancer Center 0822 study showed no differences transgenic models. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:818–828.
Copyright © 2012 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer S391