INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL

International Journal of Management (IJM), OF

ISSN MANAGEMENT
0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN (IJM)
0976 –
6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 2, March- April (2013)

ISSN 0976-6502 (Print)

ISSN 0976-6510 (Online) IJM
Volume 4, Issue 2, March- April (2013), pp. 176-179
© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijm.asp ©IAEME
Journal Impact Factor (2013): 6.9071 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com

JOB SATISFACTION AMONG NURSES OF PRIVATE HOSPITALS

IN KERALA

Sathyajith S
Lecturer, Department of Management Studies,
Vedavyasa Institute of Technology, Calicut, Kerala

Dr. R. Haridas
Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Business Administration,
Govt. Arts College for Men, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu

ABSTRACT

In the time of socio-economic stigma and reproachful protest; it is studied to

understand the level of satisfaction among nurses of private hospitals in Kerala. The study
has operationalised through the collection of data by using questionnaire of 81 questions from
200 samples and analysis of data by applying Mean, Standard Deviation and Chi-square test.

Key words: Job satisfaction, Nurses, Private hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Job satisfaction is the function of perceived relationship between what one wants from
one’s job and what he/she gets there from (Locke, E. A., 1969). It is a positive feeling about
one’s job resulting from evaluation of its characteristics (Robbins, S. P. et al., 2012). Job
satisfaction is an essential part of ensuring high-quality care. Dissatisfied not only give poor
quality, less efficient care (Grol, R. et al., 1995). Nurses who were not satisfied at work were
also found to distance themselves from their patients and their nursing chores (Demerouti, E.
et. al., 2000). Nowadays nurses are facing a socio-economic stigma in their job and working
conditions especially in private sector. They are raising voice and that echoes all over the
state and various parts of the country. In this context, job satisfaction among nurses of private
hospitals in Kerala is studied with an objective to understand the level of satisfaction.

176
International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –
6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 2, March- April (2013)

METHODOLOGY

Research on job satisfaction has tried to use Factor Analysis. Different factor
analytical studies combine different factors with job satisfaction. Fung-Kam, L. (1998)
considered salary and benefit, professionalism and autonomy. Patient care, environment,
workload, co-workers, salary and benefits, professionalism, cultural background and career
stage were considered by McNeese-Smith, D. K. (1999). Moyle, W. et al., (2003) used
workplace flexibility, residents, working in a team, dedication to service, training, role
expectations, laborious tasks, staffing levels and overtime for the study. Chu, C. I. et al
(2003) combined co-workers, role expectations, activity, supervisor, routinization and
resources. Work load, co-workers, supervisor, routinization and management were
considered by Seo, Y. Ko, J. & Price, J. L. (2004). Major dependent variables of this study
are job, management, personal adjustment and social relations. The measurement has
operationalised with a questionnaire of 81 questions prepared in the light of Satisfaction-
Dissatisfaction inventory developed by Pestonjee D. M. (1973).

The sample size has been decided as 200 nurses and Simple random sampling has
used to select them from the nurses of private hospitals in Kerala. The major independent
variables of the study are age, sex and experience.

The hypotheses set for the study are:

H01: There is no significant relationship between job satisfaction and age
H02: There is no significant relationship between job satisfaction and sex
H03: There is no significant relationship between job satisfaction and experience

For the analysis of the study, Mean, Standard Deviation, Chi-square test etc are used.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Among 200 respondents, 150 (75%) fall in the age limit of below 25, 44 (22%) in 26
to 35 and 6 (3%) in 36 to 45 age limit.

Table 1
Age distribution of respondents
Age F %
Below 25 150 75
26- 35 44 22
36- 45 6 3
46- 55 0 0
56 and above 0 0
Total 200 100

Among the respondents, 66 (33%) are male and the rest, 134 (67%) are female.

177
International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –
6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 2, March- April (2013)

Table 2
Sex distribution of respondents
Sex F %
Male 66 33
Female 134 67
Total 200 100

While taking experience, 172 (86%) are falling in the limit of below 5 years, 16 (8%) in 6 to
10 limit, 10 (5%) in 11 to 15, 2 (1%) in 16 to 20 years limit.

Table 3
Experience of respondents
Experience F %
Below 5 years 172 86
6- 10 16 8
11- 15 10 5
16- 20 2 1
21 and above 0 0
Total 200 100

Table 4 shows the overall level of job satisfaction of the respondents. 30 (15%) are
highly satisfied on their job, 144 (72%) are moderately satisfied and 26 (13%) shows low
level of satisfaction.

Table 4
Overall level of job satisfaction

Level of job satisfaction F %

High 30 15
Moderate 144 72
Low 26 13
Total 200 100

Chi square test has used to test hypotheses. Table 5 shows results of testing of hypotheses.

Table 5
Result of test of hypotheses
Relationship χ2 Value P Value
Job satisfaction and age 16.54 0.0353
Job satisfaction and sex 12.15 0.0023
Job satisfaction and experience 39.86 0.0001
at 5% level of significance

While analysing, the hypotheses set for the study are rejected. That is, age, sex and
experience are significantly related with job satisfaction.

178
International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –
6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 2, March- April (2013)

CONCLUSION

It is found from the study, the majority of the nurses working in private hospitals are
moderately satisfied in their jobs and the independent variables, age, sex and experience have
significant relationship with job satisfaction. Being job satisfaction of nurses has direct
relation with quality of health care, it become imperative to identify and address those factors
which are stumbling blocks to job satisfaction by the policy makers, administrators and
managers.

REFERENCES

1. Chu, C. I., Hus, H. M. Price, J. L. & Lee, J. Y. (2003). Job satisfaction of hospital nurses:
An empirical test of a causal model in Taiwan. International Nursing Review, 50, 176-
182.
2. Demerouti, E., Bekker, A., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W. (2000), “A model of burnout
and life satisfaction amongst nurses”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32 (2), pp. 454-464.
3. Fung-kam, L. (1998). “Job satisfaction and autonomy of Hong Kong registered nurses”,
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27 (2).
4. Grol, R., Lawrence, M. (1995), Quality Improvement by Peer Review, Oxford University
Press, London.
5. Locke, E. A. (1969), “Job satisfaction and job performance: a theoretical analysis”,
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, pp. 309-336.
6. McNeese-Smith, D. K. (1999). A content analysis of staff nurse descriptions of job
satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29 (6).
7. Moyle, W, Skinner, J, Rowe, G. & Gork, C. (2003). Views of job satisfaction and
dissatisfaction in Australian long-term care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12 (2).
8. Pestonjee D. M. (1973). Organisational Structure and Job Attitudes, Minerva Associates,
Calcutta.
9. Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., Vohra, N. (2012), Organizational Behavior, Pearson
Education, New Delhi.
10. Seo, Y, Ko, J. & Price, J. L. (2004). The determinants of job satisfaction among hospital
nurses: A model estimation in Korea. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41 (4),
437-447.
11. Karthikeyan and Dr.Dinesh.K.Srivastava, “The Relationship between Core Self
Evaluations, Individual Level Job Performance and Its Components”, International
Journal of Management (IJM), Volume 3, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 319-334, ISSN Print: 0976-
6502, ISSN Online: 0976-6510.
12. Dr. C. Swarnalatha and Mr. G. SureshKrishna, “Job Satisfaction and Work Locus of
Control: An Empirical Study among Employees of Automotive Industries in India”,
International Journal of Management (IJM), Volume 3, Issue 3 2012, pp. 92-99,
ISSN Print: 0976-6502, ISSN Online: 0976-6510.

179