Peter H. Gleick
PacificInstituteforStudies
in Development,
Environment, andSecurity
Berkeley,California
Hydrologic Mode s
Reservoir Operation
Irrigation Supply
- Water Management Models Hydroelectric production
Urban Water Supply
Figure 1. Methods for evaluatingthe hydrologic and water climatologicalvariables to drive hydrologicmodels, and the
resourceimplicationsof climatic changes. Climate change hydrologicoutputis usedas inputto watermanagement models.
scenarioscan be generatedusing general circulation models Alternatively,hydrologicscenariosof runoff and soil moisture
(GCMs), paleoclimaticdata, recent climate analoguedata, or can be generatedand useddirectlyto drive watermanagement
hypotheticalclimate data. Two types of scenarioscan be models. Each technique has advantagesand limitations as
generated: hydrologic or climatological. Climatological described in the text.
scenariosuse changesin temperature,precipitation,or other
Finally, water managerscan use the new hydrologic cannot"do the experiment" of alteringglobal climate in a
estimatesto evaluatethe performanceand designof their laboratory,we mustattemptto model climateand climatic
systemsunderdifferent climatic conditions. Thus flood changes,an imprecisealternativebecauseof the complex-
controlor reservoiroperationcanbe studied,hydroelectric ity of the global climate system. Much of the effort of
outputoptimized,emergencyfloodplainmanagement plans trying to understandclimatehas focusedon the develop-
revised,anddroughtplanningreviewed. ment of computer models of the many intricate and
To assessthe implicationsof the greenhouseeffect for intertwinedphenomenathat make up the climate. The
water resources,regional-scaledetails of future changes most complex of these models, typically referred to as
are needed for temperature,precipitation,evaporation, "generalcirculationmodels" or "global climate models"
wind speed,and otherhydroclimatological variables. Our (GCMs), are detailed, time-dependent,three-dimensional
ability to predictthesedetails,however,is limited, and we numericalsimulationsthat include atmosphericmotions,
must therefore resort to the use of climate scenarios. Such heat exchanges,and importantland-ocean-iceinteractions
scenariosshouldbe internallyconsistentpicturesof future [Manabe, 1969a, b; Schlesingerand Gates, 1980;Manabe
conditions,and they can be constructedby a numberof and Stouffer, 1980; Manabe and Wetheraid, 1980;
methods,includingthe direct use of generalcirculation Wetheraid and Manabe, 1981; Ramanathan, 1981;
models, paleoclimatic reconstructions,recent historical Manabe et al., 1981; Hansen et al., 1983, 1984, 1988;
climate analogues, or purely hypothetical climatic Washingtonand Meehl, 1983, 1984; Wilsonand Mitchell,
scenarios[WMO, 1987]. 1987; Mearns et al., 1989; Schneideret al., 1989].
Generalcirculationmodelscurrentlyprovide the best
informationon the responseof the atmosphereto increas-
Direct Use of General Circulation Models ing concentrations of greenhousegases. In theory,GCM
There are diverseways in which globalclimatemay be estimatesof changes in hydrologic variables, such as
affected by human actions. But we are unable to see runoff,couldbe useddirectlyto estimatechangesin water
clearly either the directionof changesin climate or the resources. The U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency
nature of the subsequentsocietal impacts. Becausewe [1984] took this approachto estimatepossibleimpactsof
332 ß Gleick: CLIMATECHANGEAND HYDROLOGY 27, 3 / REVIEWS
OF GEOPHYSICS
tD c,D ½D D- t'.- 0D CO C• O•
ppmv
Figure 3. Atmosphericcarbon dioxide con- 400
centrationin partsper million by volume (ppmv)
for thepast160,000years,reconstructed from the
Vostok
icecore,
Antarctica
[from
Barnola
etal., 350
1987]. NotethehighCO2 concentration
during
themostrecentinterglacial,
the low CO2 con-
centrationduring the most recent glacial maxi-
mum,therisein CO2 at thestartof thecurrent
300
P
re•s
triall
a••Vel,
aCia'
Max
imum
Prev
iou
s,i•e
rg,
ac
ia,
interglacial(18,000 years B.P.), and the recent 250
dramaticincrease
in CO2 concentration
dueto
industrial activities.
200
150
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
changes. In a striking example, Stocktonand Jacoby On a far larger scale,Bradley et al. [1987] compiled
[1976] usedtree tings to extendthe runoff recordin the precipitationdata from the mid 19th century,northern
ColoradoRiver basinback morethan400 years(Figure2). hemisphere landareasin an effort to look for trends.In the
This kind of study has direct water managementand last 30 to 40 years, significantincreasesin mid-latitude
policy implications. For example, the original 1922 precipitation (35ø to 50øN)anddecreases in low-latitude
Colorado River water allocation was based on the precipitation
(5ø to 35øN)havebeenobserved.While
hydrologicrecord availableat the time: about 30 years these trends are consistentwith GCM projectionsof
from the late 1890sto the early 1920s. In 1976,whenthe precipitation changes associated withincreasingconcentra-
historical record was reconstructed back to the middle tions of trace gases, they cannot be unambiguously
1500s, the period from 1890 to the 1920s stoodout as a attributedto this cause. Such analyseshelp to define
time of abnormallyhigh runoff (Figure2). The 400-year naturallarge-scalehydrologicalvariabilityand are useful
record now shows that more water was allocated to users in defining the longer-termperspectivefor identifying
thanis likely to be availableon a long-termaveragebasis. anthropogenic perturbations.
If the long-term record had been available in 1922, the Finally, recentclimatic anomaliescan provideinsights
overallocationmightnot haveoccurred. into the vulnerability of the present society to future
Several things limit the usefulnessof paleoclimatic climatic changes. Glantz and Ausubel[1984], Changnon
scenariosfor evaluating the impacts of future climate [1987a], Gleick [1988], Morrisette [1988], Cohen [1988],
changeson waterresources.First, the fartherwe go back and Karl and Reibsame[1989] all discussregionalwater
in time, the moredifficult it becomesto recoverhydrologic resourceimpacts that are a function of past climatic
data. Thus the evidencefor developingsuchscenariosis variability. Thesecasestudiesprovideinformationon how
limitedin extentand scope. Second,the causesof climatic to avoid environmentallyand economicallycosily climate
shiftsover geologictime may differ considerably from the impactsin the future.
anthropogenicchanges now anticipated. And third, The greatestadvantageto usingrecentclimateanalogies
because these past changes typically predate human or case scenariosis that they are based on human ex-
activity, we have no evidenceof how they might affect perience. Perhapsthe greatestdrawbacksto this approach
society.Becauseof thislast limitation,attentionhaslately are thatanticipatedgreenhouse climaticchangesmay have
turned to the use of more recent climatic extremes within a causeunlikethosethatled to pastclimaticvariabilityand
the instrumental record. that the magnitudeof the anticipatedchangesdue to the
greenhouseeffect are larger than most historicalnatural
RecentClimateAnalogues variations. Thus suchanalysesare often criticizedon the
Modem instrumentaldata can be used to develop groundsthat the recentpast is an unreliableguide to the
climatescenarios.Examplesfrom the literatureincludea future.
reviewandadjustmentof instrumental temperature records
from central Canada from 1768 up to 1910 [Ball and
Kingsley,1984]; a reconstruction of temperature for North Hypothetical ClimateScenarios
Americafrom 1602 to 1961 usinghigh-qualitytree ring Many hydrologistsusepurelyhypotheticalscenarios to
records[Fritts and Lough, 1985]; a reconstruction of the assess the behavior of watersheds in relation to future
long-termprecipitationrecordat Padova,Italy, from 1725 climatic conditions. Suchscenarios (e.g.,+2ø,+3ø,+4øC;
to 1981 [Camuffo, 1984]; and the developmentof an increasesor decreasesof 10% or 20% precipitationor
annual rainfall index for southern California from 1769 to evapotranspiration) permit the testingof wide rangesof
1834 using agriculturalrecordsfrom the Spanishperiod hydrologicvulnerabilities. Althoughthesescenariosare
[Rowntree,1985]. These types of analysescan greatly the easiestto develop,they are not particularlyrealistic,
extendtheusefulhistoricalrecordin a region. and they often lack intemal consistency.Care shouldbe
Long-termrecordscan thenbe analyzedfor examplesof taken,therefore,in interpretingtheresults.
climaticvariabilitythatoffer insightsintothe vulnerability Table 1 liststhe rangeof hypotheticalscenariosusedin
of watersystems.Wigleyet al. [1984] lookedat precipita- a variety of studies. The valueschosentypicallyreflect
tion records in England and Wales for the period bestestimatesof changesin importantclimatic variables,
1766-1980 to evaluatewhethertherehadbeena changein althoughextremevaluesareoccasionally chosento explore
the frequencyof wet and dry rainfall extremes. Jones where a systemmight fail to perform as expectedor
[1984] then used these data to reconstructriver flow to designed.Thusthepracticeof usinghypothetical tempera-
study the effects of climate on water availability. tureincreases of 1ø, 2ø, 3ø, or 4øCreflectstheconsensus
Similarly, Palutikof [1987] used scenariosconstructed thatgreenhouse warmingwill producetemperature risesin
from the instrumentalrecordto explorepossibleimpacts this range for an equivalentdoubling of atmospheric
on UnitedKingdomwaterresources in theearlyyearsof a carbondioxide. Greateruncertaintyaboutthe magnitude
climaticchange. andeventhe directionof regionalprecipitation changesis
27, 3 /REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Gleick: CLIMATE CHANGE AND HYDROLOGY ß 335
Evapo-
Study Temperature transpiration Precipitation
reflected in the choice of both increases and decreases in (1) thosemodelsthatrely primarily on empiricalor statisti-
monthlyor annualaveragerainfall. cal techniquesfor evaluatingthe hydrologiccharacteristics
of a regionor for extendingthe existinghydrologicrecord,
suchas the modelsof Schwarz[1977], Revelle and Wag-
COMBINING CLIMATE SCENARIOS WITH REGION- goner [1983], and Stocktonand Boggess[1979], and (2)
AL HYDROLOGIC MODELS thosetechniquesthat are physicallybasedmathematical
descriptionsof hydrologicphenomena, the so-calleddeter-
Once scenariosof climate change are developed, ministicor conceptualmodels[N•mecand Schaake,1982;
hydrologicmodelscan be used to estimateimpactson Gleick, 1986a, b, 1987a, b; Mather and Feddema, 1986;
water resources. If accurate estimates of future water Cohen, 1986; Flaschka et al., 1987; Bultot et al., 1988].
availability are to be calculated,regional hydrologic Stochastichydrologicmodelswere initially introduced
evaluationsneed to incorporatethe complexitiesof to analyzereservoirdesignand operation. Thesemodels
snowfall and snowmelt,topography,soil characteristics, providethe meansfor estimating,amongotherthings,the
natural and artificial storage,and monthly or seasonal probabilityof sequences of future dry or wet yearsgiven
variations. past hydrologicdata, and they are often easierto design
The conceptof usinghydrologicmodelsfor assessing and manipulatethan deterministicmodels. But since
regionalimpactsof climaticchangeshasseveralattractive stochastichydrologic techniques assume that future
characteristics.First, diversemodelingtechniquesexist. hydrologicbehaviorwill look statisticallylike the past,
This permits flexibility in identifying and choosingthe theyare of limited usein evaluatingthe effectsof climatic
mostappropriateapproachto take to evaluateany specific changes,which may alter the underlyingdistributionsand
region. Second,hydrologicmodelscanbe chosento fit the physicalrelationships amonghydrologicvariables.
characteristicsof the availabledata. Third, regional-scale For thatreason,considerable attentionhasbeengivento
modelsrequire far fewer computerresourcesand are far the wide range of deterministic, physically based
easierto manipulateand modify than generalcirculation hydrologicmodels. Many deterministicmodelshavebeen
models. Fourth,regionalmodelscan be usedto evaluate developed to analyze different types of hydrologic
the sensitivityof specificwatersheds to bothhypothetical phenomena.The modelsvary in their ability to represent
changesin climateandto changespredictedby large-scale or reproducesmall- and large-scalefeaturesof watersheds,
GCMs or climate analogues. And finally, methodsthat from narrowly focused models that study short time
incorporateboth detailed regional characteristicsand period, site-specificcharacteristicsto general models
outputfrom GCMs will be well situatedto takeadvantage capableof incorporating waterbalancesin a largeregion.
of the continuingimprovements in theresolution,regional Eachtypeof modelhasstrengths and limitations,depend-
geography, andhydrologyof globalclimatemodels. ing on modeldesign,datarequirements, and the objectives
Many typesof hydrologicsimulationmodelshavebeen of theanalyst.
developedin recent years to help hydrologistsstudy Becauseof thesevariedstrengths andlimitationsa setof
ecosystems, to aid in the engineeringdesignof structures, criteria for using regional models to evaluate the
andto studythe response of watershedsto differenttypes hydrologicimpacts of climatic changesmust be con-
of perturbations.Many classificationschemeshavebeen sidered. Gleick [1986b], expandingon the work of
used to discriminateamong these models, including Schaakeand Kaczmarek [1979], developeda set of six
physical and mathematical, continuous and discrete, importanttechnicalfactorsto be considered whenselecting
dynamic and static, descriptiveand conceptual,and andusinga regionalhydrologic modelto studytheimpacts
stochasticand deterministicmodels [Viessmanet al., 1977; of changesin climateon regionalwaterresources:(1) the
Linsleyet al., 1982]. For thepurposeof climateimpactas- inherentaccuracyof the model; (2) the degree to which
sessmentan importantdistinctioncan be madebetween modelparametersdependupon the climatic conditionsfor
336 ß Gleick: CLIMATE CHANGE AND HYDROLOGY 27, 3 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS
which the model is calibrated;(3) the availability of input magnitudeof flows. For assessment techniquesto be
data, including comparative historical data; (4) the applicableto many diverse watershedsthe modeling
accuracyof the input data; (5) model flexibility, easeof techniques mustbe flexible in their approach.As noted
use,and adaptabilityto diversehydrologicconditions; and earlier, additionalcomplexity is no guaranteeof model
(6) compatibilitywith existinggeneralcirculationmodels. accuracy;it also reducesmodel adaptabilityand easeof
use.
and verify that the relativeerrorsduringdry periodsand circulationmodels [Cohen, 1986; Gleick, 1986b, 1987a, b;
wet periodsareof similardistribution andmagnitude. Flaschka et al., 1987; Bultot et al., 1988; U.S. Environ-
What is the basisfor credibilityof a regionalhydrologic mentalProtectionAgency,1988]. Table 2 lists someof
model?Klemel [1985,p. 9] summarizes, thosestudiesthat usedgeneralcirculationmodelscenarios
of climatechangeas inputto regionalhydrologicmodels.
A hydrologicalsimulationmodelmustdemonstrate, beforeit
Cohen [1986] evaluatedthe implicationsof general
is usedoperationally,how well it canperformthekind of task
for which it is intended. Since no simulation model is circulationmodel temperatureand precipitationscenarios
for water levels in the Great Lakes. The net basin water
intendedmerely to showhow well it fits the datausedfor its
development,performancecharacteristics derived from the supplyof the Great Lakes was predictedto decline in
calibration data set are insufficient evidence for its satisfac- responseto greenhousewarming over a wide range of
tory performance. The data used for model validation climatescenarios,includingsomewith large increasesin
(verification)must representa situationsimilar to that in
precipitation,althoughthe overallresultswere sensitiveto
which the model will be used, as it is recognizedthat data
from the actual situation to be simulated are not available. changesin wind speed and other assumptionsabout
variablesthat may alter lake evaporationrates. Using
Differentmethodshavebeenusedin the pastfew years temperatureand precipitationdata from two GCMs (the
to evaluateclimate-inducedchangesin water availability GeophysicalFluid DynamicsLaboratorymodel and the
(see Dooge [1986], Betart [1986], Gleick [1986b], and GoddardInstitute for Space Studies model), net basin
Changnon [1986b] for summaries of methods and supplydecreased by between15% and30%.
approaches),including both conceptualand stochastic In a studyof the SacramentoBasinin California,Gleick
models. In one of the earliest comprehensivestudies, [1986a, b, 1987a, b] identified hydrologicimpactsthat
Stocktonand Boggess[1979] usedthe empiricalrelation- were robust and consistentover a wide range of both
shipsderivedby Langbeinet al. [1949] to predictchanges hypothetical and GCM-generated climate change
in runoff for the 18 water resourceregionsof the coter- scenarios. These include large decreasesin summersoil
minous United States. Using only hypotheticalannual moisture levels, decreases in summer runoff volumes,
averagechanges,they concludedthat warmer and drier major shifts in the timing of average monthly runoff
shiftsin climatewould be the mostproblematicfor water throughoutthe year, and large increasesin winter runoff
availability. Revelle and Waggoner[1983] also usedthe volumes. Using eight differentgeneralcirculationmodel
empirical relationshipsof Langbein et al. to evaluate temperatureand precipitationscenarios,including both
hypotheticalclimate changescenariosfor the Colorado increasesand decreasesin averageprecipitation,summer
River Basin. They concludedthat annualrunoff in this runoff decreasedby between30% and 68%, winter runoff
increasedby 16% to 81%, and summer soil moisture
regionis especiallysensitiveto changesin temperature.In
one of the first regional studies,N•mec and Schaake decreased by 14% to 36% (Figures4a-4c). The principal
[1982] useda moredetaileddeterministicapproachto look mechanismdriving thesehydrologiceffectsis a dramatic
at the impactof hypotheticaltemperature changein snowfalland snowmeltconditions. Becauseof
andprecipitation
scenarios in an arid and a humid watershed. higher temperaturesa greater fraction of annual and
More recently,a numberof studieshave offered new seasonalprecipitationfalls as rain, rather than as snow.
insights into hydrologic vulnerabilitiesto greenhouse This hasthe effect of reducingtotal annualsnowpack.In
warming. These studies involve more accurate and addition,the precipitationthat is receivedas snowbegins
comprehensiveregional water balance models and to meltearlierin the springandmeltsfaster,leadingto less
incorporateclimate scenariosdeveloped from general spring and summer snowmelt runoff and decreasesin
Gleick [1987b] X X X
Cohen [1986] X X
Mather and Feddema [1986] X X
Sandersonand Wong [1987] X
Bultot et al. [1988] X
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
[1989] X X X
Different GCM runs were used by different researchers.Thus the resultsof each
studymust be reviewedindividually. Pleaserefer to individualstudiesfor detailsof
methodologies and basin-specificassumptions.Abbreviationsare definedas follows:
GISS: Goddard Institute for Space Studies,New York; GFDL: GeophysicalFluid
DynamicsLaboratory,Princeton, New Jersey;NCAR: NationalCenterfor Atmospheric
Research,Boulder, Colorado;andOSU: OregonStateUniversity,Corvallis.
338 ß Gleick: CLIMATE CHANGE AND HYDROLOGY 27, 3 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS
8O
60
4O
20
N.I.
0
-20
I NCAR
-20
-4O - -28
-33 -31 -36
-60 • GFDL
-80
- 100
[ I I • GISS
T Only T,P(r) T,P(a)
summer soil moisture. This effect has now been noted in [1985]. Second, in watersheds with a seasonal snowfall
otherregions[Shiklamanov,1987;Bultotet al., 1988; U.S. and snowmeltpatternthe seasonaldistributionof runoff
EnvironmentalProtection Agency, 1988; Martinec and and soil moistureis more sensitiveto temperaturethanto
Rango, 1989] and has been identified in GCM results precipitation[Gleick, 1987b; Bultot et al., 1988; U.S.
[Manabe and Wetheraid, 1986; Wilson and Mitchell, Environmental Protection Agency, 1988]. In these
1987]. watersheds,higher temperaturesreducethe ratio of snow
Two other resultsare particularlynoteworthy. First, to rain during the winter, hasten the onset of spring
annualrunoff appearsto be more sensitiveto changesin snowmelt, and increase the rate of snowmelt runoff, as
precipitationthan to changesin temperature[Gleick, described above.
1987b; Flaschka et al., 1987; Karl and Reibsame, 1989], The results of these regional studies suggestthat
an effect describedtheoreticallyby Wigley and Jones physicallybasedmodelsare able to provideconsiderable
27, 3/REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Gleick: CLIMATECHANGE AND HYDROLOGY ß 339
Figure 5. Regions of the United States dependenton climatic changesthat reduce the amountof water availablefor
hydroelectricity
for between20% and 100%of electricitysupply hydroelectricitygeneration.
[from Gleick, 1989]. Theseregionsare particularlysensitiveto
1'4
. , .
.
.o 12
2:
KEY TO REGIONS
decreased freshwaterflows and changesin salinityfor the Ultimately,if realisticestimatesof changesin regional
rich ecosystemof the San FranciscoBay-San Joaquin water availability are to be calculated, a number of
Delta regionand identifiedsomeadverseconsequences of advances are needed. In order to be valuable to water
greenhousewarming for phytoplanktonproductivityand resourceplanners,regional hydrologicassessments must
fish breedingandsurvival. include(1) a focuson shorttime scalessuchas daysor
Cooper [1989] noted that impacts on recreation, weeks,ratherthan annualor even monthlyaverages;(2)
wildlife, and estheticsare often the early warning signs the ability to incorporateinto regionalstudiesthe increas-
that somethingis wrong with our environment. He ingly detailedassessments of changesproducedby GCMs;
identified a wide range of climatic changesthat would (3) the ability to produceinformationon hydrologically
adversely affect environmental services offered by important variables, such as changes in runoff and
freshwaterresourcesand proposedactive measuresto availablesoil moisture;and (4) the ability to incorporate
anticipateandalleviateanydetrimental consequences. snowfalland snowmelt,vegetationchanges,topography,
soil characteristics,
naturalandartificialstorage,aridother
regionalcomplexities.
CONCLUSIONS Finally, the long constructiontimes and subsequent
lifetimes of reservoirs, dams, and water transfer facilities
Global climatic changescausedby an increasedcon- meanthat planningshouldbegin todayfor changesthat
centrationof atmospheric tracegaseswill haveimportant may not becomeevidentfor years. Yet changesin water
and diverseimplications for freshwater resources.While resourcesmanagementand planning will only come if
we cannotseeclearlythe directionor magnitudeof many thoseresponsiblefor our water systemscan be convinced
importantchanges, research in thepastfew yearshashigh- thatthe problemof climaticchangeis sufficientlyreal and
lightedimportantregionalvulnerabilities andhasimproved pressingto require their attention. Much work remainsto
our understanding of appropriatemethodsfor addressing be done.
hydrologicandwaterresourcequestions.
In thelongrun,large-scale generalcirculationmodelsof ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. GarrisonSpositowasthe editorin
theclimatemay be ableto give usvaluableinformationon chargeof thispaper. He expresses
gratitudeto J. Dracup,K. M.
detailed,regionalimpactson watersupplies.But waiting Loague,and R. T. Wetheraidfor assistance in evaluatingits
technicalcontentand to W. Duffield for servingas a cross-
until sucha capabilityis availablemeanswaitinguntilcli- disciplinaryreferee.
mate impactsunambiguously begin to appear. For that
reason,hydrologists and water plannersare relyingon a REFERENCES
Bolin, B., R.. Doos, J. Jager, and R. A. Warrick (Eds.), The Gleick, P. H., Methods for evaluatingthe regional hydrologic
greenhouseeffect, climatic change,and ecosystems, SCOPE impactsof global climatic changes,J. Hydrol., 88, 99-116,
Rep.,29, 541 pp. 1986. 1986b.
Bradley, R. S., H. F. Diaz, J. K. Eischeid,P. D. Jones,P.M. Gleick, P. H., The developmentand testingof a water balance
Kelly, and C. M. Goodess,Precipitationfluctuationsover model for climate impacts assessment: Modeling the
northernhemisphereland areassince the mid-19th century, Sacramento Basin, Water Resour. Res., 23, 1049-1061,
Science,237, 171-175, 1987. 1987a.
Budyko,M. I., and Y. A. Izrael (Eds.),Anthropogenic Climatic Gleick, P. H., Regionalhydrologicconsequences
of increasesin
Change(in Russian),406 pp., Gidrometeoizdat,
Leningrad, atmospheric
CO2 andothertracegases,Clirn.Change,10,
1987. 137-161, 1987b.
Bultot, F., A. Coppens, G. L. Dupriez, D. Gellens, and F. Gleick,P. H., Climatechangeand California:Past,present,and
Meulenberghs, Repercussions of a CO2doubling onthewater future vulnerabilities,in Societal Responsesto Regional
cycle andon the waterbalance:A casestudyfor Belgium,J. ClimaticChange: Forecastingby Analogy,editedby M. H.
Hydrol., 99, 319-347, 1988. Glantz,pp. 307-327, WestviewPress,Boulder,Colo., 1988.
Camuffo, D., Analysis of a seriesof precipitationat Padova, Gleick, P. H., Vulnerabilitiesof water supply, in Climate and
Italy, Clim. Change,6, 57-78, 1984. Water: Climatic Variability, Climate Change, and the
Changnon,S. A., Jr., Climatefluctuationsandrecord-high levels PlanningandManagement of U.S.WaterResources,editedby
of Lake Michigan, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 68(11), P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle, JohnWiley, New York, in
1394-1402, 1987a. press,1989.
Changnon,S. A., Jr., An assessment of climatechange,water Goodfriend,G. A., M. Magarits,and I. Carmi, A high standof
resources,andpolicy research,Water Int., 12, 67-76, 1987b. theDeadSeaat the endof theNeolithicperiod: Paleoclimatic
Chow, V. T. (Ed.), Handbookof AppliedHydrology,McGraw- and archeologicalimplications,Clirn. Change,9, 349-356,
Hill, New York, 1964. 1986.
Cohen,S. J.,Impacts
of CO2-induced
climaticchange
onwater Hansen,J. E., The greenhouse
effect: Impacton currentglobal
resourcesin the Great Lakes Basin, Clim. Change, 8, temperatureand regionalheat waves, statementto the United
135-153, 1986. States Senate, Comm. on Energy and Natur. Resour.,
Cohen,S. J., GreatLakeslevelsand climatechange: Impacts, Washington,D.C., June23, 1988.
responses,and futures, in Societal Responsesto Regional Hansen,J., G. Russell,D. Rind, P. Stone, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff,
ClimaticChange: Forecastingby Analogy,editedby M. H. R. Ruedy,and L. Travis, Efficient three-dimensional
global
Glantz,pp. 143-168, WestviewPress,Boulder,Colo., 1988. models for climate studies: Models I and 1I, Mon. Weather
Cooper,C. F., Recreation,esthetics,and wildlife, in Climate and Rev., 111(4), 609-662, 1983.
Water: Climatic Variability, Climate Change, and the Hansen,J. E., A. Lacis,D. Rind,G. Russell,P. Stone,I. Fung,R.
PlanningandManagement of U.S.WaterResources,editedby Ruedy, and J. Lerner, Climatic sensitivity: Analysisof
P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle, JohnWiley, New York, in feedback mechanisms, in Climate Processes and Climate
press,1989. Sensitivity,Geophys.Monogr.Ser., vol. 29, editedby J. E.
Coutant,C. C., Foreseeable
effectsof CO2-induced
climatic HansenandT. Takahashi,pp. 130-163, AGU, Washington,
change: Freshwaterconcerns,Environ. Conserv.,8, 285-297, D.C., 1984.
1981. Hansen,J.,I. Fung,A. Lacis,D. Rind,S. Lebedeff,R. Ruedy,G.
Dickinson, R. E., Modeling evapotranspiration
for three- Russell,andP. Stone,Globalclimatechanges as forecastby
dimensionalglobal climatemodels,in ClimateProcessesand GoddardInstitutefor SpaceStudiesthree-dimensional
model,
ClimateSensitivity,
Geophys.
Monogr.Ser.,vol. 29, editedby J. Geophys.Res.,93, 9341-9364, 1988.
J. E. HansenandT. Takahashi,
pp. 58-72, AGU, Washington, Hargreaves,G. H., Water requirementsandman-inducedclimate
D.C., 1984. change,Proc. Am. Soc.Civ. Eng., 107(IR3), 247-255, 1981.
Dooge,J.C. I., Effects
of CO2increases
onhydrology
andwater Henderson-Sellers,
B., The impact of increasingatmospheric
resources,paperpresented at Symposium
onCO2 andOther carbondioxideconcentrations
uponreservoirwater quality,
Greenhouse Gases: Climatic and AssociatedImpacts,Eur. The Influenceof ClimateChangeandClimaticVariabilityon
Econ.Community,Brussels,November4, 1986. the HydrologicRegimeandWaterResources, editedby S. I.
Dracup, J. A., and D. R. Kendall, Floods and droughts,in Solomon, M. Beran, and W. Hogg, IAHS Publ., 168,
Climateand Water: ClimaticVariability,ClimateChange, 571-576, 1987.
and the Planningand Managementof U.S. Water Resources, Jacoby, H., Water quality, in Climate and Water: Climatic
editedby P. WaggonerandR. R. Revelle, JohnWiley, New Variability,ClimateChange,and the PlanningandManage-
York, in press,1989. mentof U.S. WaterResources, editedby P. WaggonerandR.
Fitzgerald,B. M., andM. A. Walsh,Significance of greenhouse R. Revelle, JohnWiley, New York, in press,1989.
changesto irrigationwater suppliesin New SouthWalesmA Jones,P. D., Riverflowreconstruction
from precipitation
data,J.
casestudyof theSevernValley, report,16 pp., Dep. of Water Climatol., 4, 171-186, 1984.
Resour.,N. Sydney,N.S.W., Aust., 1987. Josselyn,M., and J. Callaway, Ecologicaleffects of global
Flaschka,I. M., C. W. Stockton,andW. R. Boggess,Climatic climatechange: Wetlandresources of San Francisco Bay,
variation and surface water resources in the Great Basin report, Romberg Tiburon Cent. for Environ. Stud., San
region,WaterResour.Bull., 23(1), 47-57, 1987. FranciscoState Univ., San Francisco,Calif., 1988.
Fritts,H. C., andJ. M. Lough,An estimateof averageannual Karl, T., andW. Reibsame,The impactof decadalfluctuations
in
temperaturevariationsfor North America, 1602 to 1961, Clim. meanprecipitation andtemperature on runoff: A sensitivity
Change,7, 203-224, 1985. studyovertheUnitedStates,Clim. Change,in press,1989.
Glantz, M. H., and J. H. Ausubel,The OgallalaAquifer and Kates,R. W., J. H. Ausubel,and M. Berberian(Eds.), Climate
carbon dioxide: Comparisonand convergence,Environ. impactassessment, SCOPERep.,27, 625 pp., 1985.
Conservation, 11, 123-131, 1984. Klemeg,V., Sensitivityof water resourcesystemsto climate
Gleick, P. H., Regionalwater availabilityand globalclimatic variations,Worm Clim. Appl. ProgrammeWCP-98, World
change: The hydrologic consequences of increasesin Meteorol.Organ.,Geneva,1985.
atmospheric CO2 and other trace gases,Ph.D. thesis, Langbein,W. B., et al., Annualrunoff in the United States,U.S.
ERG-DS-86-1,688pp., EnergyandResour.Group,Univ. of Geol. Surv. Circ., 5, 1949.
Calif., Berkeley,1986a. Linsley,R. K., Jr.,M. A. Kohler,andJ. L. H. Pauhlus,
Hydrol-
27, 3 /REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS Gleick: CLIMATE CHANGE AND HYDROLOGY ß 343
gyfor Engineers,McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982. Pearman, G. I. (Ed.), Greenhouse: Planning for Climate
Manabe, S., Climate and the ocean circulation, I, The atmos- Change, 752 pp., Division of Atmospheric Research,
pheric circulationand the hydrologyof the Earth's surface, Commonwealth
Scientificand IndustrialResearchOrganiza-
Mon. WeatherRev., 97(11), 739-774, 1969a. tion (CSIRO), CSIRO Publications,East Melbourne, Aust.,
Manabe, S., Climate and the ocean circulation, II, The atmos- 1988.
pheric circulationand the effect of heat transferby ocean Peterson,D. F., and A. A. Keller, Irrigated agriculture,in
currents,Mon. WeatherRev., 97(11), 775-805, 1969b. Climateand Water: ClimaticVariability,ClimateChange,
Manabe, S., and R. J. Stouffer, Sensitivityof global climate and the Planningand Managementof U.S. Water Resources,
modelto anincrease of CO2 concentration in theatmosphere, editedby P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle, JohnWiley, New
J. Geophys.Res.,85, 5529-5554, 1980. York, in press,1989.
Manabe, S., and R. T. Wetheraid, On the distribution of climate Ramanathan,V., The role of ocean-atmosphere
interactionsin
changeresultingfrom an increase
in CO2-content
of the the CO2climate
problem,
J. Atmos.
Sci.,38, 918-930,1981.
atmosphere,
J. Atmos.Sci., 37, 99-118, 1980. Revelle, R. R., and P. E. Waggoner, Effects of a carbon
Manabe,S., andR. T. Wetheraid,
CO2 andhydrology,
Adv. dioxide-inducedclimatic change on water suppliesin the
Geophys.,28A,131-157, 1985. western United States, in Changing Climate, edited by
Manabe, S., and R. T. Wetheraid, Reduction in summer soil National Academy of Sciences, pp. 419-432, National
wetness induced by an increase in atmosphericcarbon AcademyPress,Washington,D.C., 1983.
dioxide, Science,232, 626-628, 1986. Rowntree,L. B., A crop-basedrainfall chronologyfor pre-
Manabe,S., R. T. Wetherald,andR. J. Stouffer,Summerdryness instrumental
recordin southernCalifornia,Clim. Change,7,
dueto an increase
of atmospheric
CO2 concentration,
Clim. 327-342, 1985.
Change,3, 347-386, 1981. Sanderson,M., and L. Wong, Climatic changeand Great Lakes
Martinec, J., and A. Rango, Effects of climate change on water levels,The Influenceof Climate Changeand Climatic
snowmeltrunoff patterns,Remote Sensing and Large-Scale Variability on the Hydrologic Regime and Water Resources,
Global Processes,Proceedingsof the IAHS Third Interna- editedby S. I. Solomon,M. Beran,andW. Hogg,IAHS Publ.,
tional Assembly, Baltimore, Maryland, IAHS Publ., 186, 168, 477-487, 1987.
1989. Schaake, J. C., From climate to flow, in Climate and Water:
Mather, J. R., and J. Feddema, Hydrologic consequencesof ClimaticVariability,ClimateChange,and the Planningand
increases
in tracegasesandCO2 in theatmosphere,
in Effects Managementof U.S. WaterResources, editedby P. Waggoner
of Changesin StratosphericOzoneand Global Climate, vol. andR. R. Revelle,JohnWiley, New York, in press,1989.
3, pp. 251-271, U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency, Schaake,J. C., and Z. Kaczrnarek,Climatevariabilityand the
Washington,D.C., 1986. design and operationof water resource systems,World
Meams, L., P. H. Gleick, and S. H. Schneider, Climate forecast- Climate Conference,Overview Pap. 12, 23 pp., World
ing in Climate and Water: Climatic Variability, Climate Meteorol. Organ., Geneva, 1979.
Change, and the Planning and Managementof U.S. Water Schlesinger, M. E., and W. L. Gates,The Januaryand July
Resources,edited by P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle, John performanceof the OSU two-level atmosphericgeneral
Wiley, New York, in press,1989. circulationmodel, J. Atmos.Sci., 37, 1914-1943, 1980.
Miller, K. A., Water, electricity,and institutionalinnovation,in Schlesinger,M. E., and J. F. B. Mitchell, Model projectionsof
Climate and Water: Climatic Variability, Climate Change, the equilibriumclimaticresponseto increasedcarbondioxide,
and the Planningand Managementof U.S. Water Resources, Projectingthe ClimaticEffectsof IncreasingCarbonDioxide,
editedby P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle,JohnWiley, New edited by M. C. MacCrackenand F. M. Luther, Rep.
York, in press,1989. DOE-0237,pp. 81-148, U.S. Dep. of Energy,Washington, D.
Mitchell, J. F. B., and D. A. Warrilow, Summer drynessin C., 1985.
northern mid-latitudesdue to increased CO2, Nature,330, Schlesinger,M. E., and J. F. B. Mitchell, Climate model
238-240, 1987. simulations of the equilibriumclimaticresponseto increased
Morgan, V. I., An oxygenisotope-climaterecordfrom the Law carbondioxideRev. Geophys.,25, 760-798, 1987.
Dome,Antarctica,Clim. Change,7, 415-426, 1985. Schneider,S. H., P. H. Gleick, and L. Mearns, Prospectsfor
Morrisette,P.M., The rising level of the Great Salt Lake: An climatechange,in Climateand Water: ClimaticVariability,
analogueof societaladjustmentto climate change,in Societal ClimateChange,and the Planningand Managementof U.S.
Responses to Regional Climatic Change: Forecastingby Water Resources,editedby P. Waggonerand R. R. Revelle,
Analogy, edited by M. H. Glantz, pp. 169-196, Westview JohnWiley, New York, in press,1989.
Press,Boulder, Colo., 1988. Schwarz,H. E., Climatic changeand water supply: How
National ResearchCouncil Panel on Water and Climate (Ed.), sensitiveis thenortheast?,in Climate,ClimaticChange,and
Climate, Climatic Change, and Water Supply, 132 pp., Water Supply,editedby National ResearchCouncil Panelon
NationalAcademyof Sciences, Washington,D.C., 1977. Water and Climate, pp. 111-120, National Academyof
NCmec,J., andJ. Schaake,Sensitivityof waterresourcesystems Sciences,Washington,D.C., 1977.
to climatevariation,Hydrol. Sci.J., 27(3), 327-343, 1982. Shiklamanov,I., Effects of climate changeson Soviet rivers,
Nicholson, S. E., and H. Flohn, African environmental and paperpresentedat the InternationalSymposiumof the XIXth
climatic changesand the generalatmosphericcirculationin General Assembly,Int. Union of Geod. and Geophys.
late Pleistoceneand Holocene,Clim. Change, 2, 313-348, (IUGG), Vancouver,B.C., Can.,Aug. 9-22, 1987.
1980. Snyder, C. T., and W. B. Langbein,The PleistoceneLake in
Novaky, B., C. Pachner,K. Szesztay,and D. Miller, Water Spring Valley, Nevada, J. Geophys.Res., 67, 2385-2394,
resources,Climate Impacts Assessment,edited by R. W. 1962.
Kates, J. H. Ausubel,and M. Berberian,SCOPE Rep., 27, Solomon,S. I., M. Beran,andW. Hogg (Eds.),The Influenceof
187-214, 1985. ClimateChangeand Climaticvariabilityon the Hydrologic
Palutikof, J.P., Some possibleimpacts of greenhousegas Regimeand Water Resources, IAHS Publ., 168, 640 pp.,
inducedclimate changeon water resourcesin Englandand 1987.
Wales, The Influence of Climate Change and Climatic Somerville,R. C. J., The predictabilityof weatherand climate,
Variability on the HydrologicRegime and Water Resources, Clim. Change,11,239-246, 1987.
editedby S. I. Solomon,M. Beran,andW. Hogg,IAHS Publ., Stockton,C. W., Interpretation
of pastclimaticvariabilityfrom
168, 585-596, 1987. paleoenvironmental
indicators,
in Climate,ClimaticChange,
344 ß Gleick: CLIMATE CHANGE AND HYDROLOGY 27, 3 / REVIEWSOF GEOPHYSICS