Number
Type of the
Individual ☐ Collaborative ☒ of 5
activity:
weeks
Intermediate,
Moment of Unit: 2 -
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: Hypothetical
situations
Delivery Environment: Monitoring
Evaluative score: 95
and Evaluation
Starting date: September 6 , th
Closing date: October 19th, 2018
2018
Competence to develop:
The student is able to understand the main points of clear texts, which
are familiar to him, either in work or study situations and uses reading
as a source of enjoyment and personal enrichment.
Topics to develop:
Step 2
Each student writes a 15 to 20 sentences paragraph directly in the
forum (please do not attach files, so your mates and tutor can easily
read your ideas) about the topic described below. The paragraph must
be an original composition using the student’s own words. Extracts
from webpages, other authors or books will not be allowed.
Step 3
Start to participate weeks ahead the deadline, so you can have a
discussion. Last days contributions might not be included in the final
paper.
Environment
for the Collaborative Learning
development
Collaborative:
Upload the Final Document in PDF or Word format
with following information:
Products to
deliver by
1. First page: complete name, CEAD and academic
student
program.
2. Include the contributions from all the students who
participated in the discussion.
General guidelines for the collaborative work
Planning of
activities for
the
Each student has to write at least 3 interventions in
development
order to accomplish the selected role.
of
collaborative
work
Roles to Each student has to write at least two significant and
perform by objective comments regarding the opinions of other
the student members of the group.
in the
collaborative The comments should remark mistakes, aspects to
group improve and contribute to the debate.
Collector: Articulate the contributions of all the
participants of the collaborative group in order to
consolidate the final paper; including only those who
took part of the whole process.
Evaluation rubric
Activity Individual Collaborative
☐ ☒
type: Activity Activity
Intermediate,
Moment of
Unit: 2 -
the Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
Hypothetical
evaluation
situations
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed
activity Score
Aspect
High score Media score Low score
The
participations There is
are relevant, minimum
articulated participation in
and contribute the writing
to the forum, besides it There is no
Participatio construction of neither meets evidence of
n the final the participation in
25
& document. requirements of the forum.
interaction The the guide and
contributions schedule nor the
are posted netiquette
according to standards.
the schedule.
(Up to 25 (Up to 15 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The written The
outcome grammatical
The proper contains some structures
use of grammatical used are
Use of grammar inconsistencies simple, they
15
grammar shows a good and the do not match
knowledge of simplicity of the the difficulty
the structures. sentences show level according
difficulties in the to the contents
structures. of the course.
(Up to 15 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The document
The written The ideas and
shows
final document sentences
inconsistencies
contains a written in the
in the
proper document look
organization and
construction of disorganized,
construction of
sentences and they are not
Coherence ideas; however, 20
paragraphs, articulated, or
the objective or
making use of do not have a
main point of
logical clear
view is
connectors. objective.
understandable.
(Up to 20 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Although the
The final vocabulary used
The
document in the final
vocabulary is
contains wide document
very limited
variety of matches the
and does not
words which difficulty level
match the
are used according to the
difficulty level 35
Vocabulary coherently, contents of the
according to
with course, it is
the contents of
appropriate limited and has
the course.
spelling. some spelling
mistakes.
(Up to 35 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 95