Tracy Blackwell
Instructor: Herington, S.
Schools are ultimately responsible to abide by Federal laws such as the Constitution. In
the First Amendment it states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances. If that is the case then a school district, being a representative of our
government system must also abide by these same principles. Does freedom of speech stop at
just speech and or our words? Wouldn’t it also include our expressions? A young man by the
Bill was recently suspended from his high school for wearing an earring to school. He
had only worn this piece of jewelry because he felt it was expressive of who he was and that it
was fashionably attractive to the young women of his school. These were the only reasons he
wore the piece of jewelry. It had nothing to do with gang representation or some other hidden
meaning. Unfortunately for Bill, his school had previous implemented a policy wherein it was
prohibited that students wear items which were viewed as gang related. This included everything
from ball caps, certain emblems and earrings and other jewelry types. Because of the prevalent
gang activity in Bill’s school, these policies were enacted. And due to Bill’s fashion statement,
Bill and his parents felt the young man’s first amendment rights were being suppressed.
The [Supreme] Court emphasized that “students in school as well as out of school are ‘persons’
under our Constitution. They are possessed of fundamental rights which the state must respect”
[Cambron/pg.100]. Bill’s earring was not likely to disrupt the educational process or collide
with the rights of other students, and for this reason it was necessary they fight the schools
actions brought against him. In examining Bills situation, one might liken it to the landmark
Student’s Rights 3
case, “Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District”, wherein three students were
suspended for expressing their opinions of the Vietnam war by wearing arm bands. The
Supreme Court came to conclude that their expression made by wearing these bands did not
cause harm nor disturb the school’s setting, although the school officials believed it could
potentially bring problems. The Court ruled that “undifferentiated fear or apprehension of
Is this not exactly what Bill was being faced with at his school?
[Cambron/pg.229]
Student’s Rights 4
References
Cambro-McCabe, McCarthy, Thomas. (2004) Legal Rights of Teachers and Students – 2nd