DEFENSE PAPER
Nicole Perl
Front Matter:
-All Language Arts are interrelated and interdependent. (All 6 Language Arts strands.)
-Language is the basis of all communication and the primary instrument of thought.
-Language learning continues throughout life.
GLO’s
1) Explore thought ideas, feelings,and experiences
1.1 Discover and Explore
1.2 Clarify and Extend
2) Comprehend and respond personally in oral, print, and other media texts
2.1 Use strategies an cues
2.2 Respond to texts
2.3 Understand forms, elements, and techniques
2.4 Create original text
3) Manage ideas and information
3.1 Process, plan and focus
3.2 Select and process
3.3 Organize, record and evaluate
3.4 Share and review
4) Enhance the clarity and artistry of communication
4.1 Enhance and improve
4.2 Attend to conventions
4.3 Present and share
5) Respect, support, and collaborate with others
5.1 Respect others and strengthen community
5.2 Work within a group
Desired Results
1. Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and represent to explore thoughts, ideas, feelings and
experiences.
2. Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and represent to comprehend and respond personally
and critically to oral, print and other media texts.
4. Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and represent to enhance the clarity and artistry of
communication.
5. Students will listen, speak, read, write, view and represent to respect, support and collaborate with
others.
2.3 Understand forms, elements, and techniques 2.3 Understand forms, elements, and techniques
2.3.3 Understand techniques and elements 2.3.3 Understand techniques and elements
Discuss connections among plot and subplot, main Discuss connections among plot and subplot, main and
and supporting characters, main idea and theme supporting characters, main idea and theme in a variety of
in a variety of oral, print and other media texts oral, print and other media texts
Assessments
Learning
Title Think, Exit Final Create Group
Outcomes
Journal pair, Slips Person your Literac present
share al own y ation
Respon charact Circles
se er/wor
ld
(Multip
le
Modali
ties)
Type
(Formative/Sum Formativ Formati Format Summa Summ Summa Repres
mative) e ve ive tive ative tive enting
Weighting
0% 0% 0% 25% 30% 15% 30%
True or False:
Determine if the question is True (T) OR False (F). Questions are 1 mark each.
1. Terabithia is created because Jess and Leslie need a secret space. _____(T)
2. Jesse is more interested in farming than he is in art. _____(F)
Extended Response:
These questions require a response written in paragraph form (4-5 sentences).
Explain your answers clearly.
3. Describe Jesse’s relationship with his father throughout the book. How does it
change when Leslie dies? (/7)
4. During the first week of school, Jesse begins to change his mind about getting to
know Leslie. Why do you think he changes his mind? Explain your answer. (/8)
Short Answer:
These questions require a written response. Answer in full sentences and explain
your reasoning.
5. Why does Jesse not invite Leslie to the museum with Miss Edmunds? (/3)
6. Why does Jesse take May Belle to Terabithia? (/3)
7. What are the differences between Jesse and Leslie’s families? (/5)
8. In the beginning of the story, why doesn’t Jesse have any friends? (/4)
Perl 10
Matching:
Each answer is worth 0.5. Total Question out of 3 marks.
Match column A with the correct answer in column B. Write the corresponding letter in the blank.
*Items can only be used once and not every match will be used*
E. May Belle
A F. Miss Edmunds
B
A. Leslie
B. Janice Avery
C. Jake
D. Mrs.Meyers
Perl 11
Teacher Kate
Quiz/Test Names Lawless
Nicole
Blueprint Perl
Dalyn
Joy
Pearce
Subject ELA 7
Topic/Focus Bridge
to
Terabith
ia Novel
Study
4.3.2 Enhance
5(3) presentation 5(3) 7
8(4) clarify and 8(4)
support ideas or
opinions with
details, visuals or
media techniques
Perl 14
Describe, tell
paraphrase,
represent,
discuss, perform,
show,
demonstrate
10 14 14 Total 3 2 3 15 15 38
Perl 15
Nicole Perl
ED 3604-A
David Slomp
Validity, Reliability, and Fairness are all essential topics to consider and aim for when designing
assessments for the classroom. Without these things, an assessment can negatively impact your students
and your practice as a teacher. Validity is concerned with if the assessment being used is actually
assessing the intended targets or outcomes and then further that the impact of the decisions we make
based on that assessment are legitimate. Reliability is concerned with the results of an assessment. This is
learning.
Validity
Validity of assessments should take into account if the assessment is truthful, suitable, and legitimate.
Not only is this important when assessing students, it is also important to consider the appropriateness of
the decisions being made based upon the assessment itself. In the book Teacher-Made Assessments
Christopher R. Gareis and Leslie W. Grant define validity as, “…the extent to which inferences drawn
from assessment results are appropriate.” (27) This is extremely important to consider throughout
assessment design. If an assessment has limited validity, students could potentially be assessed on
outcomes that aren’t relevant to the curriculum. When considering validity, it is important to remember
the four C’s which are construct, content, concurrent, and consequential validity. Each of these types of
validity have questions that can be thought about to help you achieve a valid assessment. Construct
validity refers to appropriateness in relation to curricular goals. This essentially measures if the
assessment is measuring what it is supposed to be measuring. Content validity questions if the assessment
Perl 16
measures the outcomes and the curriculum. Concurrent validity relates to having two or more assessments
aimed at the same learning outcomes at the same time. This is important because it ensures we can find
evidence of learning. Consequential validity takes the consequences of an assessment for the students into
consideration. It also focuses on the consequences of the decisions made based on the assessment in
relation to student learning. It is also important to remember that an assessment is rarely entirely valid or
invalid. Validity of an assessment should be considered as a degree of validity rather than an absolute.
Gareis and Grant state, “…validity is concerned with the confidence with which we may draw inferences
about student learning from an assessment. Second, validity is not an either/or proposition; instead it is a
matter of degree.” (28) This should be continuously reflected upon during assessment creation and
grading.
Reliability
A reliable assessment should be dependable, consistent, and error free. Dependability relates to the
results of an assessment. In any given assessment relative absence of error should be the goal. Gareis and
Grant explain that reliability, “…is the consistency or dependability of the results of an assessment.” (37)
Similarly, to validity, reliability is concerned primarily with the results of an assessment and how that
impacts students. In relation to reliability there are two distinct types of error that can be present in
assessment. It is extremely important to be aware of these types of error and how they can arise in order
to create a reliable assessment. Systematic error is error that is unintentionally present but can be
controlled if detected. Random error however is error that influences assessment results but is not easily
controlled or predicted. As educators we must account for random error as it is out of our control and
bound to happen. When it does, it will affect the results of the assessment at that time. In regard to
systematic error, we should strive to reduce systematic error when possible so that students are able to
complete tasks without factors influencing or interrupting them that are out of their control. If systematic
or random errors occur, then the assessment would have low reliability and the students could be judged
Fairness
Fairness in assessment ties into transparency, students’ opportunities, and equitable treatment. It is
extremely important to establish fair assessment practices in the classroom. Assessment is fairer when it is
appropriate for the individual learner, but this also needs to be balanced with equal treatment and
consistency in assessment. If a teacher engages in equitable practices this results in fairer assessment
which enables better support of student learning. Much like validity and reliability fairness is threatened
Creating a curriculum overview for your course before planning a unit will assist in providing an
outline of the program of studies so that you are able to review the outcomes during the duration of your
unit. Including this item when planning assists with validity of your assessment practice. The curriculum
overview I created for grade seven is clear and concise. Not only does it lay out the outcomes in an
accessible manor, it also includes words related to knowledge, skills, and attributes which ground the
outcomes and inform the reader in order to ensure validity is in mind when designing assessment tasks.
The unit assessment plan we created was designed to contribute to the reliability, fairness, and
validity in unit planning alongside the curriculum overview. By first including the desired results and
established general learning outcomes, the unit assessment plan ties into the validity of the plan. By
ensuring that the desired results are clearly defined from the beginning, it will aid in making sure that they
align with the following tasks and lessons. By including the intended understandings and essential
questions that guide the unit, it ensures that all students are being assessed fairly. The first chart in the
unit assessment plant includes classification of the assessments, how much they are worth, the type of
assessment it is, and checks off which specific learning outcomes are being met. By creating this
document, the outcomes and intentions for assessment are reviewed and revised. This also ensures that all
of the outcomes that were intended are being met and evaluated with the assessments, which ensures high
Perl 18
reliability and validity. By checking off the specific learning outcomes gaps in planning can be easily
identified and addressed to ensure that what was intended is being accomplished and assessed. It also
makes it easy to look back when planning future units and see which outcomes still need to be worked on
for the duration of the course. The assessment tool and description chart aids with fairness because it
ensures that students are being assessed with the same assignments and that the description of them is fair.
It also documents if the assessment is for, as, or of learning. This is important to balance throughout each
unit and having this chart makes sure that the assessment practice is fair for the students. I included clear
and in-depth descriptions of each assessment and in creating this chart I was able to review and
reorganize assessments as I was writing the descriptions and ensuring that I had a balance of assessments
across my chart.
The test blueprint and quiz I created with two of my peers demonstrates a quiz that has been worked
on and improved continuously by using a peer review checklist. By having colleagues review the item we
created, it assists with reliability and validity. More than one perspective on the item ensures that
systematic error is more easily eliminated before the test is given in the classroom. Our test was reviewed
for grammatical inconsistencies, clarity, and consistency. The blueprint for the quiz again aids with
validity because it ensures the specific learning outcomes are being adequately represented. In creating
this artifact, we were able to make sure our questions required higher order thinking but were still fair and
reliable. Outlining the number of marks for each question also caused us to consider what exactly we
were asking of the students and what kind of expectations we had. This adds to higher fairness so that the
students are aware of their expectations in advance, and it allowed us to be able to consider what types of
adaptations could be made. Because of the artifacts I have outlined in this essay, I am confident that the
planning I have done has increased validity, reliability, and fairness for my assessment practice.
Works Cited
Gareis, C. R., & Grant, L. W. (2015). Teacher-Made Assessments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.