Vol. 22, No. 01, pp. 143 - 152, January - March, 2005
Abstract - The filtering hydrocyclone is a solid-liquid separation device patented by the Chemical
Engineering Department at the Federal University of Uberlândia, which consists of a hydrocyclone whose
conical section was replaced by a conical filtering wall. The objective of this work is to compare the
performances of the filtering hydrocyclones designed by Bradley and by Rietema. The experimental results
obtained with the filtering hydrocyclones under the same operational conditions as those used with the
conventional device allow the conclusion that performance of the Bradley and Rietema types is significantly
influenced by the filtering medium. Rietema’s filtering hydrocyclones had a lower volumetric feed flowrate
than the conventional device and Bradley’s filtering hydrocyclones showed increases in this same variable. In
both designs, overall efficiency was influenced by the underflow-to-throughput ratio.
Keywords: Filtering hydrocyclone; Solid-liquid separation; Hydrocyclone.
DC
D0
Di
Feeding
L1
Overflow
Cylindrical section L
Glass
Filtering section
Angle
Filtrate
Underflow (Du)
Figure 1: Trajectory of suspension for the conventional hydrocyclone and filtering device scheme
where d50 is the cut size, DC is the diameter of the RL is the underflow-to-throughput ratio and CV is the
cylindrical section of the cyclone, µ is the liquid volumetric feed concentration. It should be noted
viscosity, Q is the volumetric feed flowrate, ρ is the that the effect of the underflow-to-throughput ratio
liquid density, ρs is the solid density and K is a and the influence of the solids concentration on cut
parameter characteristic of each cyclone design, size are both considered.
which is usually determined empirically. Massarani (1997) proposed Eq.(5) for prediction
It is important to highlight that the cut size of the underflow-to-throughput ratio:
obtained during operation of the hydrocyclone C
results not only from the action of the centrifugal D
R L = B U (5)
field but also from the solid material carried by the DC
downward stream fluid. Therefore, for the purpose of
comparison with other hydrocyclones, the cut size
where DU is the underflow diameter and B and C are
due exclusively to centrifugal separation should be
constants for a given cyclone design.
defined. This definition corresponds to the so-called
'
For Bradley’s and Rietema’s optimum designs,
reduced cut size ( d 50 ), in which the flow-splitting effect which are of interest in the present work, Massarani
(dead flux effect) is discounted (Svarovsky, 1984). (1997) obtained the parameters shown in Table 1.
Design K B C Eu
Bradley 0.016 54.6 2.61 7000
Rietema 0.039 145 4.75 1200
dP µ QF 2πε ( L − L1 ) ∆Pm
− = (7) Rm = (12)
dr K m A L 4ε
µQ F ln 1 +
where dP/dr is the pressure gradient through the porous Dinf + Dc
wall, QF is the filtrate flowrate, Km is the medium
Thus, the relationship between the filtrate
permeability, ε is the medium thickness and AL is the
flowrates (QF) and pressure drops through the
lateral area of the cone surface. Alternatively, Km and
filtering cone (-∆Pm) is linear. The value of Rm may
AL might be expressed as follows:
be estimated through linear regression of a data set.
It might be argued that filter cake resistivity should
ε
Rm = (8) be included in the formulation, analogous to flat
Km filtration. Nevertheless, during the experiments it
where Rm is the filtering medium resistance and AL was verified that no cake is formed, owing to the
is the lateral area of the cone surface, which might be high tangential velocity of the slurry within the
expressed as a function of the lowest radius. hydrocyclones (Souza, 2000).
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 22, No. 01, pp. 143 - 152, January - March, 2005
146 L. G. M. Vieira, E. A. Barbosa, J. J. R. Damasceno and M. A. S. Barrozo
Dc = 3.10-2
ε = 0.26.10
-2
QF
-2
L – L1 = 7.09.10 P Patm
Dinf = 0.5.10-2
Figure 2: Filtrate radial flow across the filtering cone (dimensions in meters - not drawn to scale)
EXPERIMENTAL 18µH
dStk = (14)
Material
( ρs − ρl ) gt
where I is number of the gamma-ray beams counted Table 2 shows the dimensions of the
for a uniform suspension and Io is the number of hydrocyclones studied in this work (Bradley’s and
gamma-ray beams counted for pure water. Rietema’s designs).
With the aid of an axial stirrer, the slurry was The filtering hydrocyclones had cylindrical section
made uniform and its concentration calculated diameter (DC) of 3.10-2 m and underflow diameters
according to Eq. (13). The particles were allowed to (DU) of 3.10-3, 4.10-3 and 5.10-3 m. Three filtering cones
settle further this time gravitationally, and the Stokes R1, R2, R3, were made of sinter bronze for the
diameters and the cumulative mass fractions could hydrocyclone of Rietema’s design. Besides, two cones
be obtained by means of Eqs. (14) and (15), of sinter bronze and one of polypropylene referred to as
respectively. This procedure usually required B1, B2 and P, respectively, were made in accordance
approximately 25 minutes. with Bradley’s design.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
o Exp. Data
X
--- RRB Model
D' : 14.32 microns
0.60 n: 0.73
R: 0.998
0.50
0.40 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67
dStk (microns)
Experimental Apparatus and Procedure drop was set to the desired value by either opening or
closing the valves. The system was allowed to stabilize,
Figure 4 illustrates the unit where the experiments a process which normally took about five minutes.
were carried out. It basically comprises a well-stirred Samples of all the streams, feed, overflow, underflow
tank, whose volume was approximately 0.25 m3, a 5 and filtrate, were then collected for further evaluation
HP centrifugal pump, valves, a pressure gauge and the of mass flowrates, concentrations and particle size
filtering hydrocyclone itself. The system was operated distributions. Gravimetric techniques were used to
as follows: after filling the tank with the slurry, the determine the mass flowrates. The properties of the
stirrer was switched on in order to achieve efficient fluid (µ and ρ) were estimated by measuring of the
mixing. Then the pump was turned on and the pressure temperature of the suspension.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 22, No. 01, pp. 143 - 152, January - March, 2005
148 L. G. M. Vieira, E. A. Barbosa, J. J. R. Damasceno and M. A. S. Barrozo
To apply Eq. (11) in determining of the filtering In Table 3 the values of filtering medium
medium resistances (Rm), the filtering cones were fed resistance (Rm), obtained for the fitting of the
with pure water at low flowrates at 25.5 oC. This was experimental data to Eq. (11), are displayed the
done to avoid the formation of vortices and to conventional hydrocyclones (without a filtering
guarantee exertion of constant pressure on the wall. cone) were referred to as BC and RC for Bradley’s
The experiments were carried out in a simple unit, and Rietema’s designs, respectively.
similar to the one shown in Figure 4, but consisting The Table 3 demonstrates that similar ranges of
of a peristaltic pump and a U-tube manometer. The the filtering medium resistances were used to
underflow orifice and overflow tube were closed and Bradley and Rietema hydrocyclones. In the studied
the respective filtrate flowrates (QF) and pressure operational conditions, the P filtering hydrocyclone
drops (∆Pm) were varied and measured for each was the most permeable device while the B1 filtering
cone. hydrocyclone presented the smallest permeability.
50.8
48.0
RL Underflow-to-throughput ratio
40.6
39.2
34.4
33.2
RL(%)
RC Rietema’s conventional
30.3
29.4
29.5
28.4
hydrocyclone
23.4
BC Bradley’s conventional
13.4
hydrocyclone
2.91
1.01
0.26
RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC
147000 Pa 176400 Pa
88200 Pa 117600 Pa 384
309
350
293
345
317
313
303
270
290
285
271
250
268
263
248
Q(10 -6.m3s -1)
176
209
200
165
178
184
154
168
145
153
145
140
124
133
125
108
RC R2 P B2 R1 R3 B1 BC RC R2 P B2 R1 R3 B1 P
R1 R3 B1 BC RC R2 P B2 R1 R3 B1 BC RC R2 P B2
Hydrocyclones
7500
6071
5021
4284
Eu
RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC
Hydrocyclones
Figure 7: Euler numbers for the hydrocyclones
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 22, No. 01, pp. 143 - 152, January - March, 2005
150 L. G. M. Vieira, E. A. Barbosa, J. J. R. Damasceno and M. A. S. Barrozo
1 (18)
Eu = 2
0.0119 + 0.0296R 16ρε ( L − L1 )
L
4ε
πµDC R m ln 1 +
DC + Dinf
89
85
84
83
79
78
77
76
79
77
74
75
73
73
74
71
66
65
64
62
63
62
59
RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC RC R1 R2 R3 P B2 B1 BC
Hydrocyclones
Figure 8: Overall efficiencies of the hydrocyclones
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 22, No. 01, pp. 143 - 152, January - March, 2005
152 L. G. M. Vieira, E. A. Barbosa, J. J. R. Damasceno and M. A. S. Barrozo