0 Suka0 Tidak suka

0 tayangan12 halamanEuclid

Mar 10, 2019

© © All Rights Reserved

- EUROMATH 2013, Table for Accepted Abstracts Website (Updated 12 March 2013)
- Maths_Assgn_3_09_X (1).doc
- Non Euclidean
- Lesson1-2NotetakingGuide
- Fréchet on the Constitution of Abstract Spaces
- Axiom
- 1999 McKelvey(99!1!1)-Complexity Theory...Seizing the Promise or Fad
- CT62-MLAlg2_CFS
- Interview with Gregory Chaitin
- Bartholomaeus Pitiscus
- SET 23 - Set 33 2 Ms C
- mathexit-1Q1213.docx
- 6. Sealing Fault
- 20 problemas matematicos
- Segmentos Medios de Un Triángulo s v4 Vuo s1
- Place value (2).pptx
- Lampiran 2 Mathematics Paper 2 No 1 2 3 4
- Logical Foundations
- Quantum Formalism with State-Collapse and Superluminal Communication.pdf
- Trig Plan 3b

Anda di halaman 1dari 12

Euclid was a great mathematician and often called the father of geometry. Learn more about Euclid and

how some of our math concepts came about and how influential they have become.

VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:

"The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God." And this is a quote by Euclid of

Alexandria, who was a Greek mathematician and philosopher who lived about 300 years before Christ.

And the reason why I include this quote is because Euclid is considered to be the father of geometry. And

it is a neat quote. Regardless of your views of God, whether or not God exists or the nature of God, it

says something very fundamental about nature. The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of

God. That math underpins all of the laws of nature. And the word geometry itself has Greek roots. Geo

comes from Greek for Earth. Metry comes from Greek for measurement. You're probably used to

something like the metric system. And Euclid is considered to be the father of geometry not because he

was the first person who studied geometry. You could imagine the very first humans might have studied

geometry. They might have looked at two twigs on the ground that looked something like that and they

might have looked at another pair of twigs that looked like that and said, this is a bigger opening. What is

the relationship here? Or they might have looked at a tree that had a branch that came off it like that. And

they said, oh there's something similar about this opening here and this opening here. Or they might have

asked themselves, what is the ratio? Or what is the relationship between the distance around a circle and

the distance across it? And is that the same for all circles? And is there a way for us to feel really good

that that is definitely true? And then once you got to the early Greeks, they started to get even more

thoughtful essentially about geometric things when you talk about Greek mathematicians like Pythagoras,

who came before Euclid. But the reason why Euclid is considered to be the father of geometry, and why

we often talk about Euclidean geometry, is around 300 BC-- and this right over here is a picture of Euclid

painted by Raphael. And no one really knows what Euclid looked like, even when he was born or when

he died. So this is just Raphael's impression of what Euclid might have looked like when he was teaching

in Alexandria. But what made Euclid the father of geometry is really his writing of Euclid's Elements. And

what the Elements were were essentially a 13 volume textbook. And arguably the most famous textbook

of all time. And what he did in those 13 volumes is he essentially did a rigorous, thoughtful, logical march

through geometry and number theory, and then also solid geometry. So geometry in three dimensions.

And this right over here is the frontispiece piece for the English version, or the first translation of the

English version of Euclid's Elements. And this was done in 1570. But it was obviously first written in

Greek. And then during much of the Middle Ages, that knowledge was shepherded by the Arabs and it

was translated into Arabic. And then eventually in the late Middle Ages, translated into Latin, and then

obviously eventually English. And when I say that he did a rigorous march, what Euclid did is he didn't just

say, oh well, I think if you take the length of one side of a right triangle and the length of the other side of

the right triangle, it's going to be the same as the square of the hypotenuse, all of these other things. And

we'll go into depth about what all of these things mean. He says, I don't want to just feel good that it's

probably true. I want to prove to myself that it is true. And so what he did in Elements, especially the six

books that are concerned with planar geometry, in fact, he did all of them, but from a geometrical point of

view, he started with basic assumptions. So he started with basic assumptions and those basic

assumptions in geometric speak are called axioms or postulates. And from them, he proved, he deduced

other statements or propositions. Or these are sometimes called theorems. And then he says, now I know

if this is true and this is true, this must be true. And he could also prove that other things cannot be true.

So then he could prove that this is not going to be the truth. He didn't just say, well, every circle I've said

has this property. He says, I've now proven that this is true. And then from there, we can go and deduce

other propositions or theorems, and we can use some of our original axioms to do that. And what's

special about that is no one had really done that before, rigorously proven beyond a shadow of a doubt

across a whole broad sweep of knowledge. So not just one proof here or there. He did it for an entire set

of knowledge that we're talking about. A rigorous march through a subject so that he could build this

scaffold of axioms and postulates and theorems and propositions. And theorems and propositions are

essentially the same thing. And essentially for about 2,000 years after Euclid-- so this is unbelievable

shelf life for a textbook-- people didn't view you as educated if you did not read and understand Euclid's

Elements. And Euclid's Elements, the book itself, was the second most printed book in the Western world

after the Bible. This is a math textbook. It was second only to the Bible. When the first printing presses

came out, they said OK, let's print the Bible. What do we print next? Let's print Euclid's Elements. And to

show that this is relevant into the fairly recent past-- although whether or not you argue that about 150,

160 years ago is the recent past-- this right here is a direct quote from Abraham Lincoln, obviously one of

the great American presidents. I like this picture of Abraham Lincoln. This is actually a photograph of

Lincoln in his late 30s. But he was a huge fan of Euclid's Elements. He would actually use it to fine tune

his mind. While he was riding his horse, he would read Euclid's Elements. While was in the White House,

he would read Euclid's Elements. But this is a direct quote from Lincoln. "In the course of my law reading,

I constantly came upon the word demonstrate. I thought at first that I understood its meaning, but soon

became satisfied that I did not. I said to myself, what do I do when I demonstrate more than when I

reason or prove? How does demonstration differ from any other proof?" So Lincoln's saying, there's this

word demonstration that means something more. Proving beyond doubt. Something more rigorous. More

than just simple feeling good about something or reasoning through it. "I consulted Webster's Dictionary."

So Webster's Dictionary was around even when Lincoln was around. "They told of certain proof. Proof

beyond the possibility of doubt. But I could form no idea of what sort of proof that was. "I thought a great

many things were proved beyond the possibility of doubt, without recourse to any such extraordinary

process of reasoning as I understood demonstration to be. I consulted all the dictionaries and books of

reference I could find, but with no better results. You might as well have defined blue to a blind man. "At

last I said, Lincoln--" he's talking to himself. "At last I said, Lincoln, you never can make a lawyer if you do

not understand what demonstrate means. And I left my situation in Springfield, went home to my father's

house, and stayed there till I could give any proposition in the six books of Euclid at sight." So the six

books concerned with planar geometry. "I then found out what demonstrate means and went back to my

law studies." So one of the greatest American presidents of all time felt that in order to be a great lawyer,

he had to understand, be able to prove any proposition in the six books of Euclid's Elements at sight. And

also once he was in the White House, he continued to do this to make him, in his mind, to fine tune his

mind to become a great president. And so what we're going to be doing in the geometry play list is

essentially that. What we're going to study is we're going to think about how do we really tightly, rigorously

prove things? We're essentially going to be, in a slightly more modern form, studying what Euclid studied

2,300 years ago. Really tighten our reasoning of different statements and being able to make sure that

when we say something, we can really prove what we're saying. And this is really some of the most

fundamental, real mathematics that you will do. Arithmetic was really just computation. Now in geometry--

and what we're going to be doing is really Euclidean geometry-- this is really what math is about. Making

some assumptions and then deducing other things from those assumptions.

IMPORTANT EXPLANATIONS:

Since theorems in Euclidean geometry are assumed to be true and are the

foundation of much of mathematics, wouldn't almost everything we've learned by

obsolete if this assumption of truth happened to be false?

Reply•5 comments

(177 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Andrew M

6 years ago

Theorems in Euclidean geometry are not assumed to be true, they are true. In math,

you can have absolute truth. 2+2 is 4, there is not doubt about it whatsoever.

Now, if you want to apply math to the real world, you encounter questions about

whether you are applying it properly. If space is flat, then Euclidean geometry

applies, and we have nothing to worry about. We already know, though, thanks to

Einstein, that space is not flat, and we have already learned how to use non-

Euclidean geometry, when necessary, to deal with the types of non-flatness we

know about (gravitational fields, really). We also know that geometry on the surface

of a sphere is non-Euclidean, and we know how to deal with that. The drivers of the

Mars rover do not expect to follow a triangular path whose angles add to 180 and

end up back where they were, because triangles on spheres don't add to 180.

We still do not know the extent to which Euclidean geometry would or would not

apply to the universe in a broad sense, although we have strong evidence that, on

average, space is "flat", ie Euclidean principles will hold

4 comments

(209 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 12 more replies

Rebecca Gray

5 years ago

shown to be incorrect?

Reply•1 comment

(54 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Christi

5 years ago

There was a big debate for hundreds of years about whether you really needed all 5

of Euclid's basic postulates. Mathematicians kept trying to prove that the 5th

postulate (commonly known as the parallel postulate) could be proved from the first

four postulates and thus was unnecessary. Some really great proofs were created

by mathematicians trying to prove the parallel postulate.

(Bolyai, Lobachevsky and Gauss) proved independently that there was a different

system that could be used that assumed the 5th postulate was incorrect. Later

(1868) it was proved that the two systems were equally consistent and as consistent

as the real number system. We can see different versions of systems where the

parallel postulate is false by assuming that either there are no parallel lines, or that

for any line and point not on a line there are an infinite number of parallel lines.

On a side note, in 1890, Charles Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll author of Alice in

Wonderland) published a book with a "proof" of the parallel postulate using the first 4

postulates. Not a great proof and written after it was proven that this could not be

proved.

11 comments

(80 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 5 more replies

Rahul Hirlekar

5 years ago

If Euclid studied under Plato and Archimedes why is Euclid the only one credited for

the many theorems?

Reply•3 comments

(55 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Noble Mushtak

5 years ago

Most of the time, if a person has taught someone knowledge and based off of that

knowledge, the person's student accomplishes something, the person is not credited

for his work. The teacher did not do his work, but rather he built the building blocks

to help him do so. I don't think Plato should have any credit of finding Euclid's

theorem, but rather teaching him which led to Euclid finding his theorems.

Comment

(22 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 8 more replies

rayna2rk

6 years ago

At

3:55

Sal talks how postulates are used to deduce theorems. When the postulates were

proven does it make them theorems? If not, what is the difference?

Reply•2 comments

(41 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Matthew Daly

6 years ago

Not quite. The postulates are the things that we assume to be true from the

beginning that form the foundation for all of our theorems. There are five in

Euclidean geometry: that any two points can be connected by a straight line, that

any line segment can be stretched out forever in either direction, that we can always

define a circle given a center and a radius, that all right angles are congruent, and

that for any line and any point not on that line there is exactly one line parallel to the

given line that passes through the given point. None of those postulates can be

defined from each other, but with the five of them we can prove everything in

geometry.

7 comments

(58 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 5 more replies

bathula.yashaswi

5 years ago

Reply•4 comments

(29 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Just Keith

5 years ago

No. That is lost to history. The oldest surviving copy of the original version is at

Oxford and dates to about 888 C.E. There is an older version, which is not the

original but a version edited by Theon of Alexandria, that dates to the fourth century

C.E.

4 comments

(37 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 2 more replies

VanossGaming

5 years ago

Are there any copies of The Elements textbook? I thank you in advance for helping

me.

Reply•5 comments

(26 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Just Keith

5 years ago

http://www.archive.org/stream/thirteenbookseu00heibgoog#page/n8/mode/2up

You can get more modern translation from Amazon.com

Comment

(21 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 6 more replies

Hope

5 years ago

At

4:47

, he says that "People didn't view you as educated if you did not read and

understand the Euclid's Elements." If you think about society today, I for one don't

know anyone who has read the book. What does that say about our expectations of

learning and education? Do you think it was inevitable for the standard of education

to go down?

Reply•3 comments

(18 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Matthew Daly

5 years ago

Surprisingly, you probably know a lot of people who essentially studied from The

Elements, For all intents and purposes, the geometry textbooks used in the United

States (and elsewhere probably) through the 1980's were translations of Euclid's

work except with homework problems and some of the proofs were improved. So

most everyone you know that is over 45 has studied Euclid.

Changing the standards in geometry was a controversial decision and I'm sure it

was a bittersweet day to walk away from the most profound textbook in world

history. Still, I think it was the right decision. From the middle ages through the mid-

twentieth century, geometry was the end of the road for non-mathematicians, so

understanding it the way Euclid did was appropriate. Nowadays, we're expecting

students to get through calculus, so we should teach geometry in a way that

prepares students to learn calculus. This means emphasizing some things a little

more, changing the order in which we present stuff, and leaving out some things that

will make more sense in a calculus class. This is definitely not a reduction in

standards -- someone who graduates from high school today knows far more math

than his or her grandparents had to know.

2 comments

(30 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 7 more replies

Jeremy

6 years ago

I really did not get the video. But I really want a copy of the "Element" textbook so I

can learn more. Does anyone know where to get a copy?

Reply•2 comments

(14 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Matthew Daly

6 years ago

Alternatively, any geometry textbook that is more than thirty years old follows

Euclid's path quite precisely. Also, if you google for Euclid's Elements, the top hit will

be a fantastic online companion hosted by Clark University that gives context and

commentary to every proposition along the way.

Comment

(17 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

See 8 more replies

shushruth kallutla

4 years ago

can somebody please explain euclids 5th postulate cause i dont get it

Reply•Comment

(10 votes)

Upvote

Downvote

Flag

Just Keith

4 years ago

Here is what the Fifth Postulate means, though Euclid didn't state it quite this way:

Measure the interior angles of the two lines on the same side of the third line.

Add the two interior angles together.

If the sum of those two interior angles is less than 180°, then those lines will

intersect on that side of the third line.

If the sum is greater than 180°, then those lines intersect on the other side of the

third line.

If the sum is exactly 180°, then those lines are parallel and will never intersect.

This postulate has never been successfully proven. It only works on flat surfaces

(Euclidean geometries). On curved surfaces, the fifth postulate is not true.

- EUROMATH 2013, Table for Accepted Abstracts Website (Updated 12 March 2013)Diunggah olehsuryaming2012
- Maths_Assgn_3_09_X (1).docDiunggah olehAnupam Pandey
- Non EuclideanDiunggah olehRomell Ambal Ramos
- Lesson1-2NotetakingGuideDiunggah olehaidsasis
- Fréchet on the Constitution of Abstract SpacesDiunggah olehLuis Carlos Arboleda
- AxiomDiunggah olehUday
- 1999 McKelvey(99!1!1)-Complexity Theory...Seizing the Promise or FadDiunggah olehMedjiah_Bouale_2466
- CT62-MLAlg2_CFSDiunggah olehZack Parks
- Interview with Gregory ChaitinDiunggah olehPablo Oscar Cayuela
- Bartholomaeus PitiscusDiunggah olehEugene Czz
- SET 23 - Set 33 2 Ms CDiunggah olehCrystal Lee
- mathexit-1Q1213.docxDiunggah olehJoachim De Leon
- 6. Sealing FaultDiunggah olehIman Jaff
- 20 problemas matematicosDiunggah olehCarmen Liliana Siu Yon
- Segmentos Medios de Un Triángulo s v4 Vuo s1Diunggah olehgerardodoac
- Place value (2).pptxDiunggah olehClaudia Cecilia Leguizamo
- Lampiran 2 Mathematics Paper 2 No 1 2 3 4Diunggah olehkamil muhammad
- Logical FoundationsDiunggah olehLuis Araujo
- Quantum Formalism with State-Collapse and Superluminal Communication.pdfDiunggah olehYash Nora
- Trig Plan 3bDiunggah olehErenia Yeager
- List of Important MathematiciansDiunggah olehNur Adilla Azhari
- Extended Students Exam Test (Curve)Diunggah olehPrince Yug
- 1997 California Math WarsDiunggah olehDennis Ashendorf
- DBOutputDiunggah olehRajagopal
- 2D Pythagoras - 3Diunggah olehLeong Sam
- Pecutan Akhir Matematik Tambahan 2010Diunggah olehtheuniquecollection
- GleasonDiunggah oleharestes
- deluze_genetic-algorithmDiunggah olehVi Le
- 0801.4414Diunggah olehAnonymous fLO4QulMH
- Slope of the LineDiunggah olehtutorciecleteam

- 77salesscriptingtechniquesericlofholm 1313111734007 Phpapp01 110811201958 Phpapp01Diunggah olehalamazfar
- Split Up VI to X.pdfDiunggah olehAnji Karingu
- How to Use Excel to Derive Insight From Sales DataDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- HBS - What do CEOs DoDiunggah olehToby Hicks
- Math TricksDiunggah olehBrandon Nicholson
- The Seven Day Mental DietDiunggah olehAshish Gadnayak
- 2019GoalMapping.pdfDiunggah olehSaksham Srivastava
- Retail Sales Manager Resume.pdfDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- Basics of Financial MgmtDiunggah olehJohn22y
- Success storiesDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- mark-yarnell-7-new-rules.pdfDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- Network MarketingDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- Safari - 05-Oct-2018 at 00-46Diunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 2.Solutions to 2-variable equations.docxDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- Closing TipsDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- Alka vivaDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 1.Coordinate Plane-graphing PointsDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 1. Intro to Coordinate PlaneDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 26_instant_marketing_ideas_to_build_your_network_marketing_business.pdfDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 190725994-Lesson-1-the-Unlimited-You-Silva-Life-System.pdfDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 1.Graphing a linear equation-5x+2y=20Diunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 2.Graphing a linear equation-y=2x+7Diunggah olehavijitcu2007
- word problems.Solutions to 2-Variable EquationsDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 1.Two-Variable Linear Equations IntroDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 2.Coordinate Plane Graphing Word ProblemsDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- 2.Coordinate Plane-graphing PointsDiunggah olehavijitcu2007
- syllabus-academyDiunggah olehavijitcu2007

- The Scope of Semantics PaperDiunggah olehDiana N
- The HEARSAY RULEDiunggah olehAbby Evangelista
- Carrots, Sticks, And Sermon Part 2Diunggah olehClara C. Ekarishanti
- CT2 Paper 1Diunggah olehRon James
- The allegory of the caveDiunggah olehLiezel
- BERKSON Fields of Force the Development of a World View From Faraday to EinsteinDiunggah olehManuel Balaguera
- PSYCH-248-Hunter-Summer-2019(2).docDiunggah olehPohuyist
- 273846-strategi-pengembangan-desa-mantar-sebaga-bd22236d.pdfDiunggah olehsastro
- Lesson Plan in StatisticsDiunggah olehJulovern Molvizar
- Research Proposal SeminarDiunggah olehRiyan Ardiana
- Citko B.-Phase Theory_ An Introduction (2014).pdfDiunggah olehvenuspeter
- Mineral processing notesDiunggah olehLinganna
- _Lesson 12_Diunggah olehHina Batool
- SCO Grp v. Novell Inc - Document No. 359Diunggah olehJustia.com
- PsychDiunggah olehNiejay Llagas
- Session 15 ANOVADiunggah olehAyesha Gupta
- the emergent patterns of climate changeDiunggah olehapi-272845257
- PHY F312-2019Diunggah olehSiddhant Biswas
- Lecture 2 - Heuristics and BiasesDiunggah olehNeha Prasad
- Exploratory ResearchDiunggah olehAnirudh Prasad
- A hitchhiker's guide to validityDiunggah olehJester Paul Bacabac
- Translations Into Predicate Logic for DummiesDiunggah olehSara
- Laboratory ExerciseDiunggah olehArah Jean Barba Daffon
- MOTIVATION AND LEARNING STATUS OF SECONDARY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY MARAWI SIEGE: BASIS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONDiunggah olehnico frits brioso
- Unit-1Diunggah olehSuraj Tiwari
- QUIZ 1 THE PROCESS OF DOING PHILOSOPHY.docxDiunggah olehMaria Virginia Fernandez
- MRR1 ScribdDiunggah olehwardell 30
- book review-raising global nomadsDiunggah olehapi-215117043
- Integration Part1Diunggah olehpappu_tsil
- The Effect of Word of Mouth on the Consumer Buying DecisionDiunggah olehAhmed Fayek

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.