13, No 5, 2007
ABSTRACT We assessed the prevalence of underweight, wasting and stunting among preschool
children in Oman from March to December 1999. Within each region, samples of males and females
in the age groups 0–5, 6–2, 12–23, 24–35, 36–47 and 48–60 months were drawn from the registers of
health institutions and the weight and height/length of the children were measured. The total sample
comprised 19 440 children; 9911 males and 9529 females. Data were analysed according to the World
Health Organization protocols. The prevalence rates of wasting, stunting and underweight were 7.0%,
10.6% and 17.9% respectively at the national level. There were no sex differences.
1
Department of Nutrition; 2Department of Health Information and Epidemiology; 3Department of Health
Information and Statistics, 4Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman (Correspondence to D. Alasfoor: omanmgrs@
omantel.net.om).
5
United Nations Children’s Fund, Muscat, Oman.
6
Follow-up section, Directorate General of Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Oman, Egypt.
Received: 13/07/05; accepted: 15/11/05
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
tutions were taken. This was found to be To calibrate the weighing scales, sets of
extremely demanding and inefficient so for 5, 20-lb gym blocks were weighed to the 4th
the rest of the regions a sample of the health decimal point in kilograms, and the weight
institutions was taken. of each block was pasted on it. The length
Thus for North and South Sharqia all measuring equipment was calibrated against
health institutions were included in the 60, 100 and 150 cm calibration rods (CMS
sample and weighting was carried out to Weighing Equipment, United Kingdom).
account for disproportionate sample sizes The weighing and measuring of children
during data analysis. Al Wusta region was was carried out according to the recom-
excluded from the study because of logistic mended WHO protocol [7]. A study manual
problems; this did not affect the national of the methods, description of equipment,
estimates because of the small population calibration, recruitment, measurement and
size in that region. recording instructions was complied and
To ensure adequate sampling, the most distributed to all the participants (master
recent records of children in the child health trainers and data collectors) and used for
register of the selected institutions were training.
reported to the Department of Statistics cat- An international anthropometric special-
egorized by age group and sex. These were ist introduced the master trainers (regional
randomized electronically using multistage supervisors) to the theory considerations
stratified cluster sampling. The strata were of anthropometry through demonstrations
the regions and the clusters were the institu- and individual practical sessions, a stand-
tion levels within the regions, i.e. primary ardization exercise, and the calibration and
health care centres and regional and wilayat quality control procedures. WHO reliability
hospitals. sheets were used to calculate the technical
The study sample was drawn in the De- errors of measurement and biases of each
partment of Statistics 2 weeks before data observer (both master trainers and data
collection in each region to avoid shifting collectors), and feedback was given at the
of age groups with time, which could result end of the session. The group performed
in under-sampling of neonates. Systematic well; the average length measurement was
random sampling was used to sample chil- 0.35 cm longer than the gold standard and
dren and non-Omanis were replaced. the average height measurements was 0.2
cm lower. The gold standard was the data
Equipment, standardization and of the person who was considered the most
training experienced. So during the master trainers
The UNICEF mother and child weigh- training; the international consultant was
ing scale (UNISCALE) was the standard the gold standard. In data collectors’ train-
weighing scale used in this survey. Children ings, the master trainer was considered the
below 2 years were weighed in their moth- gold standard.
er’s arms and older children were weighed All those involved in data collection in
standing. The Starter Baby Measure Mat each region were trained on the study meth-
was used to measure the length of children ods, and went through a standardization
below 2 years and the Leicester Portable session before starting the data collection.
Measure was used to measure height of The regional supervisors and at least one
older children (both from CMS Weighing member of the study team were responsible
Equipment, United Kingdom). for the training and giving individual feed-
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
back. Most of the data collectors performed measured within 3 months of the beginning
well during the standardization sessions; of data collection in that region.
the few individuals who displayed extreme The study forms were reviewed by the
bias were individually provided additional regional supervisors and the study coordina-
training. tors at the central level for inconsistencies,
completeness and pattern of measurements.
Data collection
Information on each subject in the sam- Data entry and analysis
ple was extracted from the MR2 registers Data entry was carried out on Epi-Info, ver-
and recorded in the study enrolment book- sion 6 using a specially designed data entry
lets during training, along with the MR2 and check files. The Z-scores of weight-for-
numbers, and mother’s name, address and age, height-for-age and weight-for-height
contact number. These data, as well as were computed using the EPIANTH module
unique subject numbers, were copied into of Epi-Info. The reference population was
the data collection booklets. Children were the NCHS/WHO, and age was calculated by
recruited by telephone wherever possible, subtracting the date of the anthropometric
and the measuring took place at the health measurements from the date of birth.
institutions. The defaulters were followed A team of statisticians from the Depart-
up by telephone at least 2 times, and if they ment of Statistics performed the data clean-
were not reached by home visiting, they ing, and preliminary analysis was done on
were declared non-respondents on the form the EPIANTH module of Epi-Info, where
(< 8%). the prevalence of wasting, stunting and
The study team in each institution was underweight for each region was calculated.
composed of 2 trained anthropometrists, Outliers were excluded in the analysis, and
who conducted daily measuring sessions the files of all regions were then merged to
from 08:00 to 12:00. Calibration of the a master file. To account for the variability
equipment was recorded before and after introduced by unequal selection probabili-
each session in log sheets. As the mother ties and response rates in cluster sampling,
arrived at the study site, she was asked the “CSAMPLE” module of Epi-Info was
to take off all the clothes of her child and used to calculate the prevalence estimates.
to dress him/her in a hospital gown. For A sample weight was calculated for each
each child, the 2 anthropometrists took child, which was divided by the child’s
weight and height measurements and they probability of selection, adjusted for refusal
exchanged the anthropometrist/assistant rates.
roles for each measurement. The 2 measure-
ments for each child were compared and if
the difference exceeded 100 g for weight or Results
0.5 cm for height/length, the measurements
The total sample comprised 19 440 chil-
were repeated. The regional supervisors
dren; 9911 males and 9529 females. There
paid regular visits to different study sites to
were 1990 aged 0–5 years, 1990 aged 6–11
monitor the implementation of the manual
years, 3823 aged 12–23 years, 3801 aged
of operations and verify some measure-
24–35 years, 4021 aged 36–47 years and
ments. In each region, infants at the age of
3815 aged 48–60 years.
0–2 weeks were measured at the beginning
of data collection, and all children were
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
Underweight Stunting
Moderate underweight is indicated by Moderate and severe stunting were assessed
weight-for-age lower than –2 SD of the as the prevalence of height-for-age below
median reference NCHS/WHO popula- –2 SD, and –3 SD of the reference NCHS/
tion, and severe underweight is indicated WHO population respectively. The preva-
by weight-for-age lower than –3 SD of the lence estimates and Z-scores were calcu-
same population. The prevalence of under- lated to assess the distribution of stunting by
weight was estimated from those children age group and sex.
falling below those cut-off points, and the The overall prevalence of stunting was
mean (SD) of the Z-scores were determined 10.6%, with no significant differences be-
in order to assess the distribution compared tween males and females. Stunting peaked
with the reference population (Table 1). at the age of 12–23 months, and then fell
The prevalence of underweight among to about 10%–11% for children of 24–59
all children was 17.9% with no significant months (Table 2).
difference between males and females. At
the age of 0–5 months, the prevalence of Wasting
underweight was 2.7%, and the mean Z- Wasting is an indicator of current nutri-
score was almost the same as the reference tional health status, and is directly influ-
population at that age (–0.01). Underweight enced by feeding behaviour, morbidity and
increased dramatically with age: it was house conditions. Moderate and severe
10.2% in the age group 6–11 months, 21.4% wasting were assessed as the prevalence of
for 12–23 months, 22.8% for age group weight-for-height below –2 SD, and –3 SD
24–35 months and 20.4% for age group of the reference NCHS/WHO population
36–47 months. After the age of 4 years, respectively. Overall, 7.0% of all children
underweight fell to 17.3%. Severe under- in the sample were below –2 SD of the
weight was observed in 1.5% of all children reference population median (Table 3). The
measured and showed the same age pattern prevalence of wasting among males was
(Table 1). 7.8%, (CI: 6.7–8.9) whereas the prevalence
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
that region was 7.9%, stunting 5.5% and halving the prevalence of underweight of
wasting 4.0 % (Figure 1). children under the age of 5 years by the year
2015 [8,9].
Age trends In Oman, the prevalence of underweight
The prevalence rates of all the indicators is considered a public health problem of
of malnutrition were lower than 5% in the medium importance at the national level,
age group 0–5 months; underweight rates but this varies between regions. Some have
increased rapidly to 10% in the age group a high prevalence of underweight (> 20%)
of 6–11 months, to > 20% in the age groups such as North Sharqia, Dhakhilia, South
12–23 and 24–35 months. It declined slowly Batina and Musendem, whereas Muscat,
after the age of 3 years. Dhahira, North Batina and South Sharqia
Stunting increased gradually up to the have a medium prevalence (10%–20%).
age of 2 years where it was > 10%; then Dhofar has the lowest prevalence of under-
it declined gradually. Wasting, however, weight (< 10%).
increased sharply between the age of 12 and At the national level, stunting in Oman
23 months, and then declined. is considered in the “poor” category, and all
regions except Dhofar fall in that category
[10]. When compared to previous studies, it
Discussion is evident that PEM had declined markedly
since 1980; De Onis et al. reported a 1%
Child nutritional status is an important in-
annual reduction rate of stunting [11]. This
dicator of health and development in coun-
trend was found to be consistent from 1991
tries. The Millennium Declaration signed
up to 1999. In 1991, stunting was reported
by 189 countries in 2000 set a target of
% underweight
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
Figure 2 Age pattern of protein–energy malnutrition indicators among Omani infants and
young children age 0–5 years
References
1. World Health Organization. Nutrition web- 2. De Onis et al M. The worldwide magnitude
site (http://www.who.int/nutrition/en, ac- of protein energy malnutrition: an over-
cessed 15 April 2007). view from the WHO Global Database on
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
Child Growth. Bulletin of the World Health 8. United Nations Millennium Declaration
Organization, 1993, 71(6):703–12. (A/RES/55/2). Resolution adopted by the
United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-
3. Galal O. Nutrition related health patterns
fifth session, Agenda item 60(b), Septem-
in the Middle East. Asia Pacific journal of
ber 2000.
clinical nutrition, 2003, 12(3):337–43.
9. Measuring change in nutritional status.
4. Amine E et al. Nutrition status survey in
Geneva, World Health Organization,
Oman and Bahrain. Report of the United
1983.
Nations Children’s Fund. Muscat, Oman,
United Nations Children’s Fund, 1980. 10. Physical status: the use of and interpreta-
tion of anthropometry; report of a WHO
5. Mussaigher AO. Study of health and nu-
expert committee. Geneva, World Health
tritional status of Omani families. Report
Organization, 1995 (Technical Report
of the United Nations Children’s Fund.
Series, No. 854).
Muscat, Oman, United Nations Children’s
Fund, 1992. 11. De Onis M, Frongillo EA, Blössner M.
Is malnutrition declining? An analysis of
6. Suleiman AJM, Al-Riyami A, Farid SM.
changes in levels of child malnutrition
Oman family health survey 1995: Prin-
since 1980. Bulletin of the World Health
cipal report. Muscat, Ministry of Health,
Organization, 2000, 78(10):1222–33.
2000.
12. Pelletier DL et al. The effects of malnu-
7. De Onis M et al. for the WHO Multicenter
trition on child mortality in developing
Growth Reference Study Group. Meas-
countries Bulletin of the World Health
urement and standardization protocols for
Organization, 1995, 73(4):443–8.
anthropometry used in the construction
of a new international growth reference.
Food and nutrition bulletin, 2004, 25(sup-
pl. 1):S27–36.
٢٠٠٧ ،٥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ، ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺸﺮ، ﻣﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ،ﺍﳌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ