1968 THEN/NOW
“World on Fire: 1968 Then/Now” examines the intersections of art, design, and politics of
1968 and the mythic dimensions of its global upheaval. Signal events erupted on multiple
continents with near simultaneity: There was “May 1968” in France, the Tet Offensive in
Vietnam, the murder of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; the Tlatelolco Massacre in
Mexico City; the riots at the Democratic National Convention here in Chicago; the Soviet
Union’s invasion of Czechoslovakia; and Mao Zedong’s movement to send red youth in major
cities “Up to the Mountains, and Down to the Countryside,” just to list a few. The course
will draw connections between these and recent events, as well as to what we might
broadly call “the contemporary.”
Learning Outcomes:
1. Students will analyze primary sources (objects, images, texts) relating to art
history.
-Develop skills of visual and textual interpretation
-Contextualize works in relation to global art histories and other relevant
(cultural, social, political) histories
2. Students will use tools developed by art historians.
-Write research papers using and citing sources appropriately
-Give effective oral presentations of research-based arguments
-Use museum and library resources effectively
-Situate their own inquiries in relation to art historiography
3. Students will develop arguments about art history.
-Build original ideas and demonstrate their originality by relating them to
existing scholarly literature
-Make claims persuasive by grounding them in interpretation of sources
Classroom Policies:
Device Use
Please use devices for note-taking in the first two rows of the classroom only.
Please consider taking notes on paper during class instead.
Please use devices to write with in the museum. Please safeguard the works of art
and follow all instructions from the museum’s security officers.
Assessment
Credit in undergraduate classes at SAIC requires a grade of C (70%) or above.
Credit in graduate classes requires a B (80%) or above.
Writing Center
Please consider taking full advantage of SAIC’s writing center in pursuing these
projects:
Writing Center
LV, 116 S. Michigan, 10th floor
http://www.saic.edu/academics/academicresources/writingcenter/
Appointments: http://www.saic.edu/academics/academicresources/writingcenter/
makeanappointment/
Academic Misconduct
From the SAIC Student Handbook:
“Academic misconduct includes both plagiarism and cheating, and may consist of: the
submission of the work of another as one’s own; unauthorized assistance on a test
or assignment; submission of the same work for more than one class without the
knowledge and consent of all instructors; or the failure to properly cite texts or
ideas from other sources. Academic misconduct also includes the falsification of
academic or student-related records, such as transcripts, evaluations and letters
of recommendation. Academic misconduct extends to all spaces on campus, including
satellite locations and online education.
Inclusion Statement
In keeping with SAIC policy, students with disabilities (including 'invisible'
difficulties such as chronic diseases, learning disabilities, or psychiatric
complications) are encouraged to make an appointment with the professor to discuss
accommodations by the end of the second week of the term so that appropriate
accommodations can be arranged. Students who think they would benefit from
assistance or accommodations should first contact the Disability and Learning
Resource Center (DLRC) by phone at 312.499.4278 or email at www.dlrc.saic.edu. DLRC
staff will review your disability documentation and work with you to determine
reasonable accommodations. They will then provide you with a letter outlining the
approved accommodations for you to deliver to all of your instructors.
Students must complete all of the course components in order to receive a passing grade.
Participation (10%)
Weekly 1-page analytical outlines (due every Sunday by 11:59 pm via Canvas) (20%)
Each class for every reading assignment, students will turn in a one-page typed
analysis. These assignments are due at the beginning of every class and late
analyses will not be accepted. Their purpose is to help everyone prepare to talk
about the material. I do not “grade” these in the same way I would a research
paper, but rather will be assigning grades of either “credit” or “no credit,” using
the latter for both missing and unsatisfactory work.
1) In the first section, state the thesis of the article. If there is more than
one thesis, choose the thesis that you consider most significant.
30 Details Response on 1968-era work from the museum. Due February 12th. (10%)
For this assignment, you will write a response to one work, made between 1965 and
1975, currently on view at the Art Institute that you think engages pressing
social, political, or cultural issues that still face us today.
Artist name, Title, Year, Medium. Collection of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Expanded Critical Response to object from paper #1, drawing on readings from the
class. Due March 19th. (20%)
For this assignment, you will expand on your initial response to an object from the
museum. Now that you've read and heard more on the period, you will compose a 3-4
page paper (600-800 words) that argues for its significance to the legacy of 1968
by using at least one of the readings assigned for class.
Four VAP lectures are required for this class (see below). After each
lecture, bring 2 questions or comments for discussion in section.
Emory Douglas
Tuesday, March 5, 6:00 p.m.
The Art Institute of Chicago, Rubloff Auditorium
230 S. Columbus Dr.
Newton Harrison
Tuesday, April 9, 6:00 p.m.
The Art Institute of Chicago, Rubloff Auditorium
230 S. Columbus Dr.
Presented in partnership with SAIC’s Conversations on Art & Science Series
Martha Rosler
Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 p.m.
The Art Institute of Chicago, Rubloff Auditorium
230 S. Columbus Dr.
Presented in partnership with the Art Institute of Chicago
Research paper (2000 words). Topic proposals (due Week 10) to be approved by
instructor. Due in May 10th. (30%)
READINGS:
Mitchell Abidore, (Opinion), “What the Non-Revolution of May ‘68 Taught
Us” New York Times (5 May 2018), SR4.
Jill Lepore, “What 2018 Looked Like Fifty Years Ago,” December 31, 2018.
Week Two TOPIC TWO
JENNIFER LEE
Red Media: The Cultural Revolution
Primary texts
Feb 5 “Decision of CPC Central Committee Concerning the Great Proletarian
Cultural Revolution (Adopted on August 8, 1966),” in Peking Review, Vol.
9, No. 33 (April 12, 1966): pp. 6-11.
Secondary text
Andrew G. Walder, “The Red Guards” & “Red Terror,” in Fractured
Rebellion: The Beijing Red Guard Movement (Harvard UP, 2009), 1-8.
In-class viewing
dazibao (big character posters)
Philip Foner, The Black Panthers Speak. (New York: Da Capo Press, 2002),
ix-xviii; 16-17.
GRADS
Feb 19
ALL:
Dorothy Jackson, “The Black Experience in Graphic Design,“ Print 1968
(reprinted in Print Summer 2018).
Victor J Papanek, Introduction, Design for the Real World; Human Ecology
and Social Change (New York: Pantheon Books, 1972).
GRADS:
Secondary text
Thomas P. Bernstein, “Urban Youth in the Countryside: Problems of
Adaptation and Remedies,” The China Quarterly, No. 69 (March 1977): pp.
75-91. [the article is longer; you may read on as time allows]
April 2 Karal Ann Marling and Robert Silberman, “The Statue near the Wall,”
☙ Smithsonian Studies in American Art 1 (Spring 1987): 4-29.
Gopnik, Adam. “Learning from the Slaughter in Attica.” The New Yorker
(August 29, 2016): 1-7.
GRADS:
Angela Y. Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete?, (New York: Seven Stories Press,
2010), Excerpts.
April 16 Readings
☙ Gary Ka-wai Cheung, “Finale to the Hong Kong Style Cultural Revolution” &
“Impact of the 1967 Riots,” in Hong Kong’s Watershed: The 1967 Riots
(HKUP, 2009), 121-142.
GRADS
Christine Loh, “The Chinese Communist Party Tools of Co-optation and
Persuasion,” in Underground Front: The Chinese Communist Party in Hong
Kong (HKUP, 2010), pp. 27-43.
Recommended reading
Lawrence Cheun-yin Wong, “The 1967 Riots: A Legitimacy Crisis?” In Robert
Bickers and Ray Yep, eds., May Days in Hong Kong: Riot and Emergency in
1967 (HKUP, 2009), 37-52.
Alan Smart and Tai-lok Lui, “Learning from Civil Unrest: State/Society
Relations in Hong Kong Before and After the 1967 Disturbances.” In
Bickers and Yep, eds., May Days in Hong Kong, 145-159.
Panelists:
Simon Anderson, SAIC
Romi Crawford, SAIC
James Elkins, SAIC
Michelle Nickerson, Loyola University
Week
Fourteen