I
_.1
I
_
I L
riW ~ - .
~
a
LEVEL
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA , SAN DIEGO
Departh~ent of App lied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences
La Jolla, California 92093
~~~~~~~~~~
d
~~~~~
DDC
!‘ T’ :
~T~ ~~~ nfl
~~
by E. Reisene r
SEP 18 1
918 J
I B .’ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
‘ STATEMENT
!QN
~~~~ ~ ~~~
~~~~~~ for public r
l
. s
. q
July 197 8 butis Unhaj t.d
~
0
~~
CD
C. .) Prepared for
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARC H
Wa shington . D.C.
(:9 11 (‘88
? 1 =
- - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -~ -— ~-----——---- ~~ ~~~~ —
- .— . __*.
~~~~~ ~ ~
--_ ~-
~
ON LATER AL BUCKLIN G OF END-LOADED CANTILEVER BEAMS
4
by
E. Reissner
A BSTE AC T
mation , ar e used for the purpose of obtaining a numerical re sul t for th ,,,~~~
I .e
~C B If Sc. ion
Dt
~ ~
UNA i OtJ J’ T)
—
.; ~~ ~ ~
-I- ‘
Di3 .
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
loaded beams beg ins with two fundamenta l pape rs , written Independently and nearly
correct , excep t for the anal ysis of ce rta in secondary effects which are of no
observed b y 11. R e i R s n c r ( 3j that the equations of the problem of late ra l buc kling
with the analysis of the ( two ) secondary effects , being automatically included In
the a na lysis of the pro blem. Beyond making the above Important advance in the
thi rd orde r linear diffe rential equation , and to a buckling load equation of the
fo rm c P
3 + c
2
P
2
+ ... I. in arriving at the above result H. Reissner neglects
one of the two secondary effects and indicate, that he intends to give the numerical
:)
Ten yea rs after the publication of H. R.etssne r ’ e note , In 1914 , his
with full inclusion of secondary effects , and with a bucklin g for mula given by
the vanishing of a second order determ inant , wit h each of the four term s in the
determinant a power serie s in the buckling load. Grobe r concludes his analys i s
with the statement tha t he will “as soon as possible evaluate some num erical
cases and compare the results with experiment .” Grobe r was killed in action
equation for the case of a narrow rectangular-cros s section beam (with the
The othe r is a recent paper by D.H . Hodges and D.A. Peters [7) which under-
takes to re-examine the problem once again ab Initto on the ba i’ii s of II. Reissne r ’s
They fin d , In what must be conside red an Impo r tant advance in the field of this
-2-
Ic
___ _ _
p r oble m , tha t a systematic f i r s t - o r d e r analysis of both second-order effects
comes ou t to be actually simpler than the analysis In which one of the two
effects is neglected , with the basic thi rd -order dif ferential equation of the
p roblem now having an explicit f i r s t in tegral , leaving the problem in the form
for the case of the problem wi thout consideration of any secondary effects.
The main purposes of the present paper are the following. (1) We wish
f o r finitel y deforming rods in such a way that full advantage ii taken of the
fact tha t the boundary conditions of the p roblem allow a complete solution of
theory w ithout any rega rd to the form of strain displacement relations. (2) We
t heory ind icat es the evident possibility of a straightfo rward pe r turba tIon expan-
sion, in such a way that the results of the theory without secondary effects
appea r as the leading term s in the expansion , with both secondary effect.
appea ring systematically in second and sti ll hi gher-order te rms. (3) We use
which takes account of axial extension and transve rse shea r defo rmation effects
[6J , for the pu rpose of dete rn i in i n g the effect of transverse shear defo rmation
—3-
P
t - x 1P 1 - ~t 2P2 + Pt = 0 , (la)
P
1 + - + P1 = 0 , ( I b)
(Ic)
+ ~ 1M 2 - ~t 2 M 1 + rn~ = 0 , (Za)
+ X2M t - x~M z +P
1
+m
1 = 0 , (Zb)
M~ - X j M + x M + P + m = 0 (Zc)
t ~ i 2 2
.
beam , tangent and no rmal to the cente r line , with P and P being in the
1 2
di rections of the princ i pal axe s y and y of the cross section , p~, ‘
and w i t h
1 2
~1
a nd p beIng the corresponding surface force intensities. Furthermore ,
2
and M are c ro ss secti ona l tw isting a n d bending m oments , with rn m
2 ~ 1
and m being surface moment Intensities corresponding thereto , and with
2
X~ , X and being twisting and bendin g s t rains whi c h a r e here taken to be
1 ~~
related to the twisting and bending moments by con st itut ive equations of the form
M~ = D k M = D ~~ (3 * , b , c)
1 1 2 2 2
.
.
~
I
~
I ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
—
_ _ _ _ _ _
with the principal di r ectlp n y of the cross section of the undeformed beam.
1
It is evident that the problem as described I. of such nature that one possible
state , the un bu ck led state , involves no more than the two forces p , the
1 ~~~~~
moment M
1
and th e bending strain x~ , with P
2
= 0, M
2 = M
~ = 0 and = = 0,
and with the associated buckling problem being the problem of dete rmining
the smallest value of P which allows the existence of alternate , buckled, states
follows.
Since we do not know the orientation of the loaded end of the l eam , we cannot
say anything about the values of P 1, P and P~ for x = 0. However , the condi-
2
tion that the direction of P remains the same , no matte r what the orientation
of the loaded end cross section mig ht be , In conjunction with the condition tha t
the suppo rted end of the beam , x = L , I. assumed to be built-in, mean. that
means of equations (3). We furthe r note specifically that the above fo rmulatIon
of the problems holds , withou t any re ference to relations whIch exist between ‘
~~~
I
I
the strain components t and whateve r de scr i p tion we mi ght choose for trans-
the unbuckied s tate , with overba rs desi gna ti ng forces , moments and strains
of thi s state .
-
*~ P~ = 0 , + = o (6a , b)
~~~~~
M +P = 0 , , (7a . b)
1 1
M (0) 0 (Ma , h . C)
1 ‘ ‘
~~ .
l’
)
A P P~ +~~ P 1 M~ +AM ,C = (9a-d)
~
, +~~~ ic~
t ~~ t~~~ ~~t 1 1 ~
, ,
~~~~
P~ + + p 0 (lOa)
1
,
+~ M - M x 0 , (lob)
1 2 1 2
M~ - x 1M t + + P2 = 0 • (lOc)
The as~ ociatrd boundary conditions are
M (O) = M (0) 0 P - 0 ( h a , b, C)
t 2
.
2
, (L)
Note tha t the singly underlined term s in (10) describe the effec t of initial
des c r i be s the effect of finite deformation in the analysis of the initial state.
For practical applica tions both effects In the analysis of the given problem are
but that , numericall y, the effect of the P _term Is only about one -fifth the
t
effect of the x -te rm s .
1
2
x = , P - Pp = PLm (PL /D )Pq (12)
1
,
1
, •
and we i ndicate differentiation with re spect to ~ by dots . With this the differen-
2 2
q - mp = 0 , p + (PL / D ) mq
1
-
0 , m’ + p = 0 , (13a . b , c)
We now consider
2
- PL / D (15)
1
as a small pa rameter and expand the solution of (13) and (14) In powers of
~~
::: _ _ _ _ _ _
The result of the sim ple calculation , to the degree needed in w h a t follows , c omes
out to be
(16)
where
2
p I , m = 4 , q
~ 4(1 - ~ ) , ( 17)
0 0
and
L
~ L~
8 4 8
~~
—
‘
m
l 8 12 40 ’ (18
For what follows it I. important to note that the small parameter ?J l may
2 /Dt D2
PL
— (19)
~/D
or , with
D D
L (20)
~~~~~~ t ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
a.
(2 1)
~1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
where , as is k nown from previous work , the value of a for which buckling occurs
We begin by
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
rew ritIng equations (10), in conjunction with equations (3), in the form
_ M _ M I) M
+ P -s—
1
= 0 . M - 1 -
~~~
—
M -~~-
1
= 0 , (22a , b)
+ - + P2 = 0 . (Z2c)
We next introduce into these the contents of equation (12), and fu r ther-
more write
2
with the choice of the fac tor PL /D In the expression fo r M being of p a r t i c u l a r
2 t
importance. With this eq uations (22) become
(1 ,p )m( )f = 0 (24b)
~ 2
- -
2 •
with the bounda ry conditions for thi .system following from equations (4) and
(5)as
f (0)
z = =0 , g(l) = 0 , (25a , b c)
and with the coefficient functions p . q and m following from (16) to (20) as
p = 1 +
2
a ,p~fl ~p~ + ... , m -~ +
2
O 77 77 m + ... , q = 4 - 4C
2 + ... (26)
2 ~
te rms which determine the effect of the small pa rameters and on the
~2
smallest possible nonvanishing value of ~. We further note that it appe a r s
likel y tha t the third order eigenvalue problem (24) gnd (25) , wi th coefficient
functions given in accordance with (13) and (14) without any assumptions
-9-
I
concern i ng the sm alln es s of t)~ and would offe r no parti cula r difficulties
he re to seeing i n w h ich way a dire c t sol ution , w ithout use of such computational
.
Problem. It I. clear from (24) to (26) that the functions g, f and f may be
1 2
expanded in powers of the p a r a m e t e r s and We limit ourselve, h e r e
2 2
g 4- a [f + 4 f l (1- £ 111 = 0 , f~ + ( 1 17~ )~ f = 0 , (27a , b)
t 2
-
- - + g 0 , (27c)
The t h i r d order problem (27) and (25) may be reduced to a second order
3
(~ g)~ + ~~~~ ~ 4 (6 -
£ )f
2] 0 (28)
~
.
Having the factor in front of the bracket in (28) , we may now utilize equations
- 10-
- l)f ] . Therewith, and with the fIrst two condition, in (25) we
~ deduce
from (28) the first-Integra l relation
~~~~~~~ + C 1-~ 2
- o ,? L_ J~
fJ +
2
‘126 g = 0 , (30)
2
g” + a J (1 )C 2 2
~2
- - 3C )Jg = 0
- , (31)
with the two associated boundary conditions being , in accordance with (25)
and
(27), the con ditio n s g ’(O) = g(1) = 0.
g = g + ?7 g + ?1 g + .. . a~ = 0~ (l c t1 ~~~ +
,
~ 2 2 +
2 2 + . .. ) . (32)
~~
It is evident , wIthout any calculations , that c 1. In order to obtain the va l ues
2
of 0~ and c , we deduce from (31) the diffe rential equation,
~
i a~~~ g 0 g ’+ 2
0
= , = (h(6) - c~6 ]g (33)
0 ,
2)
where h(C) = 1(1 -
~C with boundary co nditions g (O)
=g (0) = g0(1) = g (l) = 0.
t
The well-known app ropria te solution of the zeroth-orde r
equation is
g =
4(3 a c2 ) , where 0 4.0 126. Solution of the first-order equation
~~~~~~ h/ 0 0~
—1 1—
I
—~—— —
- _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ :
-_ __ _
-—~~ -- .-
—- _ __ _ _
in ( 33) b y the method of variation of parameters and satisfaction of the boun-
1 2 1 2 2
hg d J’0[ _114( z °o 6 d~
~ ~
!
0 0~
- - - 1 285 (34 )
2 2 ~
- -
2
~ C g~ dI
! ~ [6J 1/4 (4a062)]2d6
!
and therewith 0 a (l
+ O. 64i ) whe re , it should be noted, the correct
+ 0.
~
~~~0 ~
numerical value of the coefficients of has first been obtained by Hodges and
Peters [7J, with the corresponding value of c . which follow s upon omission of
~
th e doubl y underlined terms in (
27) and (28) beIn g l .645~ .
M~ + x M x M + y P - y P +m~ =0 , (35a)
1 2 2 1
-
1 2 2 1
M + t M - M + (1 + - +m = 0 , (3 5b)
~Z t ~t z 1
M~ - ~t M + + (1 + V~)P 2 y P + m 0 , (35c )
1 1 ~ ~
-
2
4
y and P. For wha t follow, we take these additional constitutive equations
I
In the Ion-i
0 C P (36*, b,
~ lPI 12
= , = = C)
2 2
.
~1
With the above the equations correspondin g to equa tions (6) to (8) for the
M P . P (7a *)
1 ~ 1 ~~‘1 ~ °
At the same time equation (l0a) for the buckled state remains as before
- X M +V P - V2 P 1 0 , (lOb *)
+ 2 1 =
1 2
_ x M + M +P _ V P =0 ( 10c C )
M 2 2 t
.
~~ 1 t ~~1 1
CD CD
1 1 2 2 (37)
2 ~ 2
A2
L L
We then have that equations (13a , b) remain unchanged while equation (l3c)
Is rep laced by
m ’ + (1 -
2
112l7~ 7 A 1~ )P = 0 . (13c 5)
one of them . (24a) , remains unchanged while the remaining two are replaced by
-13-
-
2 2
+ , ~~ -
fl )mf 1 + ~ -
~2 0 ~~ q g 0 . (24c 5)
~
In considering the problem of solving the system (13) and (24), subject
to the boundary conditions (14) and (25) we note the possibility that the trans-
of the problem for the case tha t both and A 2, a s wel l as a nd ?~~ , are small
compa red to unity. We m a y the n neg l ect products of these parameters and
of and With this we have that equations (24a) and (24b *, C C ) may be
~~
simplified to
2 2
+ a f =0 , f~ + Cf - X g 0 , f - a Cf + g = 0 (38)
1 2 2 t .
2 2
g + 0 (6 + A 2)g = 0 , ( 39)
(31) to (34)
2
~[a _ l/ 4( ~ o c 2)]
! dC
~ -5.57 (40)
C = -
A 2
i~ [cJ 114(4 ’
0t2)J d6
and therewith a reduction of the value of the buckling load parameter due to the
I
-J 4-
A _ —
_
_
- -
REFERENC ES
3. H. Reissne r , Iiber die StabI1it ~ t der Blegung, Sits. -Ber. der Berline r
Math. Geseilschaft 3 , 53-56 , 1904 .
I
—15—
- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.....JINCLASSIPTED - ________ . .-
~~
SC C IJ flIT Y CL ~ S5• riV A Ti,,,i or r,,~ ’ ~~~~ I
s. , cc
~ ‘ ~~~r IStPC, i e r moo
~~ covento
N L E ~~ -~~~~ ED d
~~~~~~ ~~
-
.
/
‘ CANTILEVER BEAuS. s
~\~~ I er ~~~ amew~~o.,. . se
— —
. A UTfIOP ( .) S. C 1*AC T as peAs? u.jecae(.I
— ~~~
( :1 E./Reissne r ] ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
’X H 7
La Jolla, California 92093
II. COUT NO LL 1,10 O~~TII’ C 11*51 ISO AOt mIcS - Ii pEP...?
/ ~
IIAIZ
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
,/
U
IJNcLASSIFIR D
IS.. OECL *551 FIC AT IO N/ DOwNGe*OINO
SC-N £ DULl
IT DI~~I 1fIl~ U1 I~ )t4 ST * Y f SF111(..f Il,. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •~ flfr r A 20 . I HU.,.A( P.s. R.r..H)
(C.,ilbiu. a., far. ,.. .Sd. It ,..c.w. y and gdsnHh A~’ bIock .
. ub.r)
Cantilever , Lateral buckling , Secondary effects , Perturbation expansions ,
Transverse shear corrections .
recent extension of K irchhoff ’ s theory , which take account of transverse shear def r-
used f or the result for the influence
DO ~~~~~~ 14/3 10,11011 or I ~ 0V (I’. IS O r’ ; OLETE
• ‘
~
_ _ _
_ _ _
~~~~~