Disabilities
(Fall, 2018)
Assignment #2
40 pts.
Due Date: Nov. 8, 2018
This assignment involves completing a Behavior Support Plan (BSP; see below).
This should be done on the student upon which you focused on in Assignment 1 (your
FBA).
Provide a brief description of the student who is the focus of your assessment
(age, labels, approximate levels of academic/adaptive functioning), and the contexts in
which s/he operates in school (e.g., regular or self-contained, type of school, etc.). This
could obviously be cut and pasted from your Assignment #1.
You will need to complete the attached Behavior Support Plan. I have also a
completed example. Be sure to fill out all relevant sections (which is likely to be most of
them). In the section on data collection, be sure to indicate who will meet and how
often to review the data to make decisions.
So, your completed assignment should consist of the usual cover page, your
student description, and completed BSP form.
Behavioral Support Plan
Description of Student
Witzel is a 7-year-old boy receiving special education services for
developmental delay. He is diagnosed with ADHD. He has great verbal capabilities and
has the capability to use complex sentences to communicate his needs and wants.
Witzel does use other means, specifically aggression and self injury, to communicate in
some instances. Witzel receives his services in a self-contained behavioral supports
classroom. He receives some speech services; these services are pushed into the
behavioral support classroom.
Talk outs/ disruptions were defined as talking out of turn, mimicking, talking with peers,
arguing, singing, or other auditory noises while others are talking.
_____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________
Rating Scales:
______Problem Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ)
___x__ Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS)
______Other (list/describe)
_______________________________________________________
Provide one or more Summary Statements (as appropriate) from the Functional
Assessment Data (include Motivating operations if known, Antecedents, Behaviors,
and Maintaining Functions)
When Witzel is left alone and is unable to get desired attention immediately, he will
engage in talk outs/ disruptions in order to obtain attention.
During self start individual work, Witzel will have less than five talk outs/ disruptions in
the first twenty minutes of individual work.
Witzel has the capability to understand that using hand raises will get attention from
staff members. Witzel uses many ways to try and gain attention from staff members.
Teaching Witzel that using a hand raise will get attention from any staff member
promptly will make this behavior of hand raises more efficient to gain attention.
Another strategy we could use is a help card. This would look like placing a card on
his desk during independent work times. If he raises his card, a staff member will
promptly help him with his question (this is achievable in the setting he is in now). For
this to be successful as a teaching strategy, we would need to also make changes so
that talk outs/ disruptions were not as effective in receiving immediate attention from
staff during independent work assignments. Finally, during social skills instruction
(provided by the social worker) we can teach the listen, think, ask strategy. This looks
like students practicing listening to directions, thinking about them, and asking
questions. Students practice appropriate attention getting skills (like hand raises and
help cards), following directions for assignments, and waiting for help (while also
thinking about what they can do to solve their problem). This is taught during a unit
and practiced many times. Each student in the unit receives 45 minutes of social skills
instruction from the unit social worker daily. During this instruction time each student
will get individualized instruction on teacher pleaser social skills.
Class wide data collection includes frequency data for each time period of the day and
is collected by all staff members on an app. This includes both positive behavior data
collection for following directions and using hand raises and negative behavior data
collection for talk outs/ disruptions. Frequency is tallied so that a student can lose a
total of ten points in one period over ten academic periods. A daily percentage is
recorded. Positive points are recorded for each time a student uses a hand raise or
follows a direction from a teacher. Data is graphed weekly for daily percentage
(percentages on the y axis from 0-100 and days of the week on the x axis). Positive
daily points is recorded on another graph (points on the y axis and days of the week on
the x axis).
Antecedent Strategies
One predictor strategy that could provide support to Witzel would be giving
directions for assignments in small groups. This would look like stating the direction for
an independent work task to three or fewer students at a time. Witzel yelling across
the classroom to get help on an assignment or have a direction repeated would
become irrelevant if directions were given in small groups because a staff member
would be there to provide the attention immediately.
Another predictor strategy we could provide to support Witzel is using pre-correction
and the pre-mac principle throughout the day. This would look like explaining behavior
expectations to Witzel before a point in which he will be alone without attention. If
Witzel follows the expectations for that time period, he would be rewarded with social
praise or another predetermined social reward like free time with peers. Having worked
with this student for a while, we know that social rewards with peers is more desired
than staff attention during assignments. This could make talk outs/ disruptions less
likely to happen because they are ineffective to getting the preferred social reward.
Positive-
During independent work time Witzel will earn positive token economy points for being
on task, following directions, using hand raises, and finishing work. Each positive point
converts to a dollar in class money which can be used to buy tangible items, free
assignment passes, iPad/ computer time, teacher lunch day, etc. Witzel will receive
verbal positive praise from a staff member approximately every 6 minutes. Witzel will
receive positive verbal praise when he uses a hand raise to request teacher attention
and will be reinforced with help or attention as promptly as possible. If Witzel has four
or less talk outs / disruptions in one academic data collection period, he will receive five
bonus classroom dollars points. If four or less talk outs / disruptions are true for six
academic periods (and other safety and work completion criteria is met) he will move
up in the classroom level system, earning more privileges and access to more
reinforcers. This demand can be increased as Witzel makes progress towards this
goal. If Witzel has less than five talk outs in 9 out of 10 academic periods for three days
demand increase should be discussed.
Reductive-
If Witzel has five or more talk outs in one academic period, he will owe one minute and
twenty-seven seconds of recess. Staff will verbally tell Witzel when he has two and four
recorded talk outs.
If Witzel has, in one day, 6 or more academic periods with five or more talk outs, over
two consecutive days he will drop a level on the in-class level system losing access to
reward activities, specific desired reinforcers, and other privileges.
LRBI Approvals (Briefly describe what level of approvals (e.g., basic parent
notification, parental approval, district/state committee approval), if any,
would be needed for the procedures that you have described above,
according to the state LRBI guidelines).
Member Responsibilities
Filled out top portion of BSP with all of the background information (2 pts)
Positive- (3 pts) – Be specific- what, who, when, and how will the reinforcement
be delivered? Don’t just say- token economy
Reductive- (3pts) –Be specific- what, who, when, and how will the reductive
strategy be implemented. Don’t just say “time out will be implemented.”
Reactive Emergency/Crisis Procedures. (2pts)
Completed Team member portion of the BSP with each members responsibility
(1pt)
Behavioral Support Plan
Emily’s is off task and disruptive during reading and math instruction. Examples of this
behavior include laughing at the teacher when she is talking, blurting out answers when
it is not her turn, and making loud noises such as piggy noises. Non-examples include
when she answers a question when called upon, tells a joke at an appropriate time, or
makes noises on the playground. Her behavior occurs between 10-15 times per half
hour class period and is worse if she has not spent time talking with a teacher/other
adult before school.
Provide the Summary Statement from the Functional Assessment Data (include
Motivating operations if known, Antecedents, Behaviors, and Maintaining Functions)
When Emily has not had adult interactions before school and then is asked to
participate in whole group math and reading instruction, she talks out and talks back to
gain adult attention
During whole group math and reading instruction, Emily will remain on-task during 85%
of intervals observed for 5 days.
During independent work time, Emily will receive instruction outlining key “on-task”
behaviors. During the first few days of the intervention and periodically after that, Mr.
Sugai will model to Emily what “on task” looks like, provide non examples of on task,
and have Emily practice telling the difference between the two. Then Emily will show
Mr. Sugai what on task looks like. Booster training sessions will be provided as needed.
During independent work time, Emily will also be taught to “self-manage” her on-task
behavior. During math and reading, her teacher will use a beeper tape set at random
intervals. Emily will be taught that when the beeper goes off, she marks the “on task”
side of her card if she was on task and the “off task” part of her card if she was off task.
After teaching Emily what on task looks like (See above), Mr. Sugai will have Emily
practice recording on the sheet with the beeper tape. Practice will continue until Mr.
Sugai has evidence that Emily is accurate in her self recording of on task behavior.
Describe a data collection system to monitor the replacement behavior and state
how the data will be summarized
Time on task will be measured using momentary time sampling on a variable interval
(average 3 min) schedule. The beeper tape will signal the random intervals and the
points placed in the “On task” part of Emily’s chart will be divided by the total
opportunities to record to get a percentage of time on task (e.g., Emily has 11 marks on
the “on task” part of her card, there were a total of 15 opportunities to earn points so
her on task rate was 11/15 ‘ 73%). Data will be summarized in graphic format with the
percent of time on task being the vertical axis and the days of the week being along the
horizontal axis.
Emily will check in with the behavioral health aide, Ms. Chauran, before school to
increase one-on one adult attention.
Antecedent Strategies
Pre-corrects will be used to prompt Emily on key on task skills prior to academic
periods. “Remember Emily you are working on staying on task during math. That
means eyes on me or instructional materials, raising hands before speaking,
keeping talk related to the instruction, etc”
Emily will be prompted to use her self-management sheet prior to academic periods.
Emily will be reminded that reinforcement is available it she meets her on task goal..
Positive-
During academic periods, the teacher will praise Emily approximately every 5
minutes if she is on-task. If Emily meets daily criteria on her self-management card,
she can earn 5 minutes of free-time to play with either Mrs. Chauran or a parent
volunteer. Daily criteria will first be set at 75%, then increase to 80% after 5 days of
meeting the goal, then increase to 85% after 10 days.
Reductive-
If Emily is off-task, the teacher will provide specific verbal praise to a nearby
compliant peer. If Emily continues to remain off-task, the teacher will use a simple
re-directive statement (e.g., “Emily, I need you to get back on task by listening to the
lesson.”). If she does not comply she will be asked to go to “Think Time.”
If Emily does not meet her daily on task goal, she will not receive free time.
LRBI Approvals
Signed Parental Behavior Expert Required on
Consent Team
Precorrection No No
Check-in with Adult No No
High Rates of Positive Response No No
from Teacher
Self Management No No
Modeling/Diff. Reinforce No No
Of Another Person’s Beh.
Prompting No No
Social Skills Instruction (On Task No No
Skill focused)
Administrative Intervention/Sent No No
to Office
Think Time (aka Interclass Staff Discretion No
timeout)
Physical Restraint Yes Yes
Member Responsibilities