LUCKNOW
Seminar Report on
Session
2018-2019
Submitted by
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
(Mechanical Engineering)
Guide
(Er. Mahmood Alam)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take great pleasure in expressing my gratitude to Mr. Mahmood Alam for his kind
guidance all along the way. I give my sincere regards to Mr. P.K Bharti (HOD)
Last but not least, It goes without saying that I am indebted to my parents and a no
of friends who have extended their cooperation and help during the seminar work.
MD.AFAQUE ANSARI
B.tech 4th year (M.E.)
.
1500101164
CONTENTS
1. Introduction 5
2. Pollution control 5
Pollution control
Pollution control, in environmental engineering, any of a variety of means
employed to limit damage done to the environment by the discharge of harmful
substances and energies. Specific means of pollution control might
include refuse disposal systems such as sanitary landfills, emission control
systems for automobiles, sedimentation tanks in sewerage systems,
the electrostatic precipitation of impurities from industrial gas, or the practice
of recycling. For full treatment of major areas of pollution control, see air
pollution control, water pollution control, solid-waste management,
and hazardous-waste management.
6
Air pollution and control
7
Most air contaminants originate from combustion processes. During the Middle
Ages the burning of coal for fuel caused recurrent air pollution problems in
London and other large European cities. Beginning in the 19th century, in the
wake of the Industrial Revolution, increasing use of fossil fuels intensified the
severity and frequency of air pollution episodes. The advent of mobile sources
of air pollution—i.e., gasoline-powered highway vehicles—had a tremendous
impact on air quality problems in cities. It was not until the middle of the 20th
century, however, that meaningful and lasting attempts were made to regulate or
limit emissions of air pollutants from stationary and mobile sources and to
control air quality on both regional and local scales.
The best way to protect air quality is to reduce the emission of pollutants by
changing to cleaner fuels and processes. Pollutants not eliminated in this way
must be collected or trapped by appropriate air-cleaning devices as they are
generated and before they can escape into the atmosphere. These devices are
described below. The emphasis of this article is air pollution control technology
as it is designed to remove particulate and gaseous pollutants from the
emissions of stationary sources, including power plants and industrial facilities.
(The control of air pollution from mobile sources is described in emission-
control system.)
8
Control of Particulates
Because each air pollution control project is unique, it is usually not possible to
decide in advance what the best type of particle-collection device (or
combination of devices) will be; control systems must be designed on a case-by-
case basis. Important particulate characteristics that influence the selection of
collection devices include corrosivity, reactivity, shape, density, and especially
size and size distribution (the range of different particle sizes in the airstream).
Other design factors include airstream characteristics
(e.g., pressure, temperature, and viscosity), flow rate, removal efficiency
requirements, and allowable resistance to airflow. In general, cyclone collectors
are often used to control industrial dust emissions and as pre-cleaners for other
kinds of collection devices. Wet scrubbers are usually applied in the control of
flammable or explosive dusts or mists from such sources as industrial and
chemical processing facilities and hazardous-waste incinerators; they can handle
hot airstreams and sticky particles. Electrostatic precipitators and fabric-filter
baghouses are often used at power plants.
Cyclones
9
Cyclone collector, for removing relatively coarse particulates from the air.
Small cyclone devices are often installed to control pollution from mobile
sources.Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
Cyclones are best at removing relatively coarse particulates. They can routinely
achieve efficiencies of 90 percent for particles larger than about 20 micrometres
(μm; 20 millionths of a metre). By themselves, however, cyclones are not
sufficient to meet stringent air quality standards. They are typically used as pre-
cleaners and are followed by more efficient air-cleaning equipment such as
electrostatic precipitators and baghouses (described below).
Scrubbers
Devices called wet scrubbers trap suspended particles by direct contact with a
spray of water or other liquid. In effect, a scrubber washes the particulates out
of the dirty airstream as they collide with and are entrained by the countless tiny
droplets in the spray.
10
In orifice scrubbers and wet-impingement scrubbers, the air-and-droplet mixture
collides with a solid surface. Collision with a surface atomizes the droplets,
reducing droplet size and thereby increasing total surface contact area. These
devices have the advantage of lower water-recirculation rates, and they offer
removal efficiencies of about 90 percent for particles larger than 2 μm.
Venturi scrubbers are the most efficient of the wet collectors, achieving
efficiencies of more than 98 percent for particles larger than 0.5 μm in diameter.
Scrubber efficiency depends on the relative velocity between the droplets and
the particulates. Venturi scrubbers achieve high relative velocities by injecting
water into the throat of a venturi channel—a constriction in the flow path—
through which particulate-laden air is passing at high speed.
Electrostatic precipitators
11
Electrostatic precipitator, a common particle-collection device at fossil-fuel
power-generating stations. Encyclopaedia like Britannica, Inc.
Particles that stick to the collection plates are removed periodically when the
plates are shaken, or “rapped.” Rapping is a mechanical technique for
separating the trapped particles from the plates, which typically become covered
with a 6-mm (0.2-inch) layer of dust. Rappers are either of the impulse (single-
blow) or vibrating type. The dislodged particles are collected in a hopper at the
bottom of the unit and removed for disposal. An electrostatic precipitator can
remove particulates as small as 1 μm with an efficiency exceeding 99 percent.
The effectiveness of electrostatic precipitators in removing fly ash from the
combustion gases of fossil-fuel furnaces accounts for their high frequency of
use at power stations.
Baghouse filters
12
One of the most efficient devices for removing suspended particulates is an
assembly of fabric-filter bags, commonly called a baghouse. A typical baghouse
comprises an array of long, narrow bags—each about 25 cm (10 inches) in
diameter—that are suspended upside down in a large enclosure. Dust-laden air
is blown upward through the bottom of the enclosure by fans. Particulates are
trapped inside the filter bags, while the clean air passes through the fabric and
exits at the top of the baghouse.
A fabric-filter dust collector can remove very nearly 100 percent of particles as
small as 1 μm and a significant fraction of particles as small as 0.01 μm. Fabric
filters, however, offer relatively high resistance to airflow, which leads to
substantial energy usage for the fan system. In addition, in order to prolong the
useful life of the filter fabric, the air to be cleaned must be cooled (usually
below 300 °C [570 °F]) before it is passed through the unit; cooling coils
needed for this purpose add to the energy usage. (Certain filter fabrics—e.g.,
those made of ceramic or mineral materials—can operate at higher
temperatures.)
13
collapse; or by sending a short burst of air down through the bag, causing it to
briefly expand. After the dust is removed from the filters, it falls into a hopper
below and can be collected for disposal or further use. Care must be taken not to
remove too much of the built-up surface dust, or “dust cake,” when cleaning the
filters. In most filter types the filter itself is only a substrate that allows for the
formation of a layer of dust cake, which then captures the majority of the
particulates. Filters with an applied membrane coating such
as polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) do not require the use of dust cake to
operate at their highest efficiency.
Control of Gases
Absorption
14
out in packed scrubbers, or towers, in which the liquid is present on a wetted
surface rather than as droplets suspended in the air. A common type of packed
scrubber is the counter current tower. After entering the bottom of the tower, the
polluted airstream flows upward through a wetted column of light, chemically
inactive packing material. The liquid absorbent flows downward and is
uniformly spread throughout the column packing, thereby increasing the total
area of contact between gas and liquid. Thermoplastic materials are most widely
used as packing for countercurrent scrubber towers. These devices usually have
gas-removal efficiencies of 90–95 percent.
Co current and cross-flow packed scrubber designs are also used for gas
absorption. In the cocurrent design, both gas and liquid flow in the same
direction—vertically downward through the scrubber. Although not as efficient
as countercurrent designs, cocurrent devices can work at higher liquid flow
rates. The increased flow prevents plugging of the packing when the airstream
contains high levels of particulates. Cocurrent designs afford lowered resistance
to airflow and allow the cross-sectional area of the tower to be reduced. The
cross-flow design, in which gas flows horizontally through the packing and
liquid flows vertically downward, can operate with lower airflow resistance
when high particulate levels are present.
Sulfur dioxide in flue gas from fossil-fuel power plants can be controlled by
means of an absorption process called flue gas desulfurization (FGD). FGD
systems may involve wet scrubbing or dry scrubbing. In wet FGD systems, flue
gases are brought in contact with an absorbent, which can be either a liquid or a
slurry of solid material. The sulfur dioxide dissolves in or reacts with the
absorbent and becomes trapped in it. In dry FGD systems, the absorbent is dry
pulverized lime or limestone; once absorption occurs, the solid particles are
removed by means of baghouse filters (described above). Dry FGD systems,
compared with wet systems, offer cost and energy savings and easier operation,
15
but they require higher chemical consumption and are limited to flue gases
derived from the combustion of low-sulphur coal.
Several FGD methods exist, differing mainly in the chemicals used in the
process. FGD processes that employ either lime or limestone slurries as the
reactants are widely applied. In the limestone scrubbing process, sulphur
dioxide reacts with limestone (calcium carbonate) particles in the slurry,
forming calcium sulphite and carbon dioxide. In the lime scrubbing process,
sulphur dioxide reacts with slaked lime (calcium hydroxide), forming calcium
sulphite and water. Depending on sulphur dioxide concentrations and oxidation
conditions, the calcium sulphite can continue to react with water, forming
calcium sulphate (gypsum). Neither calcium sulphite nor calcium sulphate is
very soluble in water, and both can be precipitated out as a slurry by gravity
settling. The thick slurry, called FGD sludge, creates a significant disposal
problem. Flue gas desulfurization helps to reduce ambient sulphur dioxide
levels and mitigate the problem of acid rain. Nevertheless, in addition to its
expense (which is passed on directly to the consumer as higher rates for
electricity), millions of tons of FGD sludge are generated each year.
16
Wet scrubber using a limestone slurry to remove sulfur dioxide from flue
gas.Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
Adsorption
17
In moving bed adsorbers, the activated carbon moves slowly down through
channels by gravity as the air to be cleaned passes through in a cross-flow
current.
Incineration
Afterburners are used to control odours, destroy toxic compounds, or reduce the
amount of photochemically reactive substances released into the air. They are
employed at a variety of industrial facilities where VOC vapours are emitted
from combustion processes or solvent evaporation (e.g., petroleum refineries,
paint-drying facilities, and paper mills).
Carbon sequestration
The best way to reduce the levels of carbon dioxide in the air is to use energy
more efficiently and to reduce the combustion of fossil fuels by
18
using alternative energy sources (e.g., nuclear, wind, tidal, and solar power). In
addition, carbon sequestration can be used to serve the purpose. Carbon
sequestration involves the long-term storage of carbon dioxide underground, as
well as on the surface of Earth in forests and oceans. Carbon sequestration in
forests and oceans relies on natural processes such as forest growth. However,
the clearing of forests for agricultural and other purposes (and also the pollution
of oceans) diminishes natural carbon sequestration. Storing carbon dioxide
underground—a technology under development that is also called geo
sequestration or carbon capture and storage—would involve pumping the gas
directly into underground geologic “reservoir” layers. This would require the
separation of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases (or some other source)
—a costly process.
19
As a reference for water quality, distilled waters (H2O) represent the highest
state of purity. Waters in the hydrologic cycle may be viewed as natural, but are
not pure. They become polluted from both natural and human activities. Natural
degradation effects may result from a myriad of sources - from fauna, flora,
volcano eruptions, lightning strikes causing fires and so on, which on a long-
term basis are considered to be prevailing background levels for scientific
purposes.
Human-made pollution disrupts the natural balance by superimposing waste
materials discharged from various sources. Pollutants may be introduced into
the waters of the hydrologic cycle at any point. For example: atmospheric
precipitation (rainfall) may become contaminated by air pollutants; surface
waters may become polluted in the runoff process from watersheds; sewage
may be discharged into streams and rivers; and groundwaters may become
polluted through infiltration and underground contamination.
20
Watershed sources of water pollution
Watersheds are the originating domain of surface water pollution. A watershed
is defined as an area of the earth’s surface on which hydrologic waters fall,
accumulate, are used, disposed of, and eventually are discharged into streams,
rivers or other bodies of water. It is comprised of a drainage system with
ultimate runoff or collection in a stream or river. Large river watersheds are
usually referred to as drainage basins. Figure 3 is a representation of the
hydrologic cycle on a regional watershed. For a region, the disposition of the
various waters can be written as a simple equation, which is the basic equation
of hydrology as written by Viessman, Lewis and Knapp (1989); typical units are
mm/year:
P - R - G - E - T = ±S
where:
P = precipitation (i.e., rainfall, snowfall, hail)
R = runoff or watershed surface flow
G = groundwater
E = evaporation
T = transpiration
S = surface storage
21
Figure 3. Regional hydrologic cycle
Although watersheds may vary greatly in size, certain drainage systems for
water pollution designation are classified as urban or non-urban (agricultural,
rural, undeveloped) in character. Pollution occurring within these drainage
systems originates from the following sources:
Point sources: waste discharges into a receiving water body at a specific
location, at a point such as a sewer pipe or some type of concentrated system
outlet.
22
Non-point (dispersed) sources: pollution entering a receiving water body from
dispersed sources in the watershed; uncollected rainfall runoff water drainage
into a stream is typical. Non-point sources are also sometimes referred to as
“diffuse” waters; however, the term dispersed is seen as more descriptive.
Intermittent sources: from a point or source which discharges under certain
circumstances, such as with overloaded conditions; combined sewer overflows
during heavy rainfall runoff periods are typical.
23
Water quality use designations
The ultimate goal in the control of water pollution would be zero discharge of
pollutants to water bodies; however, complete achievement of this objective is
usually not cost effective. The preferred approach is to set limitations on waste
disposal discharges for the reasonable protection of human health and the
environment. Although these standards may vary widely in different
jurisdictions, use designations for specific bodies of water are commonly the
basis, as briefly addressed below.
Water supplies include:
24
and plant managers to solve their in-plant noise control problems. Common
noisy equipment such as compressors, blowers, vacuum pumps, stamping
presses, air handling units and many others have been successfully treated with
the below listed options. Many of the options available come in standard
dimensions to accommodate industrial facility budgets and tight time
constraints. eNoise Control can also provide recommendations and product
sales for custom products that are engineered for your specific sound control
application. In addition to noise control products, eNoise Control also suggests
employing certain best practices to reduce the noise in your facility.
SOUND CURTAINS
Sound curtains or sound blankets are an effective means of noise reduction and
sound proofing of process machinery, pumps, compressors and anything in a
facility that requires noise control and access to the equipment. Sound curtains
are a proven solution for industrial noise control.
SOUND ENCLOSURE
Sound Enclosures offer the highest level of sound control and noise reduction
utilizing modular steel panels with various constructions to meet your
equipment access, ventilation, and usable floor space needs. Manufactured to
25
your specifications and the best engineered solution for your industrial noise
control process or equipment.
Sound curtains or sound blankets are an effective means of noise reduction and
soundproofing of process machinery, pumps, compressors and anything in a
facility that requires noise control and access to the equipment. Sound curtains
are a proven solution for industrial noise control.
Sound Enclosure
Sound Enclosure
Sound Enclosures offer the highest level of sound control and noise reduction
utilizing modular steel panels with various constructions to meet your
equipment access, ventilation, and usable floor space needs. Manufactured to
your specifications and the best engineered solution for your industrial noise
control process or equipment.
26
Steel Sound Enclosure
Sound barrier walls are used indoors and outdoors for the control of noise where
a roofed sound enclosure system is impractical or impossible. Constructed of
modular steel panels and typically structural steel columns. A sound barrier wall
is an effective solution for many industrial noise control equipment
applications.
Silencers
Silencers
Silencers, also known as attenuators or mufflers, are the most effective means of
solving airflow generated noise. Typically mounted inline with ductwork or
directly to the sound generating equipment itself, acoustical silencers offer the
highest level of sound reduction for air generated noise to exceed your industrial
noise control goals.
Baffles
27
Acoustic Baffles
Baffles are an economical and unobtrusive method for adding sound absorption
to a noisy area where equipment access is at a premium and enclosures are not a
practical solution for sound control. Typically ceiling mounted and available in
many standard or custom sizes to meet your industrial noise control application
needs.
Composite Foam
Acoustic Foam
Composite foam is an easy and effective means of noise control for lining
existing machine cabinets or steel housings to reduce unwanted noise. Available
with or without protective facings, additional sound barriers, and PSA adhesive
backing. A simple solution for industrial noise control equipment.
Sound Blanket
28
Acoustic Sound Blanket
Duct Lagging
Duct Lagging
29
Acoustic Test Chamber
Quiet rooms and test enclosures are efficient, in-process solutions to QC parts
and assemblies on a noisy shop floor. These acoustic enclosures keep out
unwanted sound to accurately test parts on the production line and meet your
industrial noise control needs.
30
References
Fig-1 5
Fig-2 8
Fig-3 10
Fig-4 11
Fig-5 15
Fig-6 18
Fig-7 19
Fig-8 20
Fig-9 23
Fig-10 23
Fig-11 23
Fig-12 24
Fig-13 24
Fig-14 25
Fig-15 25
Fig-16 26
Fig-17 26
Fig-18 27
Fig-19 27
31