Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: LHESLY B. BINONGO Name of Rater: Alfon M. Tiengo

Position: Teacher I Position: Principal II
Review Period: June 2018-October 2019 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Habay Elementary School

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Daily Lesson Plan and Instructional
Prepared Daily 5-OUTSTAN DING Q E T AVE
Materials characteristics:
lesson Plans and -Has met the five(5) characteristics of LP/DLL
a. It has five parts
Daily Logs of 4-Very Satisfactory
June 2018 b. Objective is SMART, based on the
activities including -Has met the four(4)characteristics of LP/DLL
to desired learning competencies
appropriate, 3- Satisfactory
April 2019 c. It has adequate and appropriate
adequate and -Has met the three(3)characteristics of LP/DLL
instructional materials
updated instructional 2- Unsatisfactory
d. Develop Higher Order Thinking
materials (15%) -Has met the two(2) characteristics of a LP/DLL
Skills(HOTS)
1-Poor.Has met the one(1) characteristics of a LP/DLL
e. Developing 21st Century Skills
5-OUTSTANDING
-Has met the five(5)characteristics of Facilitated Learning a. Teaching methods and interactive
4-Very Satisfactory methods and strategies elicit
• Facilitated learning
- Has met the four(4) characteristics of a Facilitated interaction from a class
A. in the school through June
Learning b. Participative learning-project-based
functional lesson 2018
35% 3- Satisfactory c. Cooperative Learning strategies
TEACHING plans, daily logs and to
- Has met the three(3) characteristics of Facilitated d. Information and Communication
LEARNING innovative teaching April 2019
Learning Technology (ICT) integration (i.e.
PROCESS strategies (10%)
2- Unsatisfactory Multimedia etc.)
-Has met the two(2) characteristics of Facilitated Learning e. Provision of individualized
1-Poor interaction
-Has met one(1) characteristics of Facilitated Learning
•Monitored 5-OUTSTANDING • Class Rules and well-behaved
attendance, diversity -Presence of all five(5) evidences students
appreciation, safe, 4-Very Satisfactory • Positive/ productive/ safe learning
June 2018
positive and Presence of four(4) evidences environment
to
motivating 3- Satisfactory . SF 2
April 2019
environment, overall Presence of three (3) evidences Required Evidences:
physical atmosphere, 2- Unsatisfactory a. Inclusive/multi-cultural/accepting
cleanliness and - Presence of two (2) evidences environment: stress free classroom
orderliness of 1-Poor setting
 classrooms including -Presence of one( 1)evidence b. Well-structured well kept, orderly,
proper waste and well ventilated classroom
disposal daily (10%) c. Presence of bins for waste
segregation
d. Updated attendance chart
5-OUTSTANDING Required Evidences:
-Presence of all five(5) evidences a. Class Record/E-Class Record
•Monitored, evaluated
4-Very Satisfactory b. Learners Portfolio
and maintained June 2018
-Presence of four(4) evidences c. Table of Specifications (TOS) of
pupils progress within to
30% 3- Satisfactory Test Questions(TQ)
the rating period. April 2019
-Presence of three (3) evidences d. Assessment Tools and Analysis
(10%)
2- Unsatisfactory Reports
- Presence of two (2)evidences e. Test Item Bank
1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence f. Updated School Forms ( SF-1,SF-2)
5- Outstanding
- Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 100% of
students who need it.
4- Very Satisfactory
- Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 88-99%
B. •Conducted
who need it.
remediation/ June 2018
3- Satisfactory
PUPILS/ enrichment programs to  Remediation/enrichment
-Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 77-87%
STUDENTS to improve April 2019 programs conducted
who need it
OUTCOMES performance
2- Unsatisfactory
indicators (10%)
- Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 39-76%
who need it.
1-Poor
- Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to 38%
and below who need it
5- Outstanding -100% updated pupils school records
4- Very Satisfactory
June 2018 -88-99% updated the pupils school reports
•Maintained updated
to 3- Satisfactory
pupils school records  Updated pupils school records
April 2019 -77-87% updated the pupils school reports
(10%)
2- Unsatisfactory
-39-76% updated the pupils school reports minimal
1-Poor -38% pupils reports are not updated
5-Outstanding-Presence of all five(5) evidences
4-Very Satisfactory a. Notice/Letter to parents/guardians
C. •Conducted Periodic June 2018 -Presence of all four(4) evidences b. Agenda/Schedule
PTA Meetings/ to 3- Satisfactory c. Minutes of the meeting
20%
COMMUNITY Conferences (10%) April 2019 -Presence of three (3) evidences d. Record of Attendance duly signed
INVOLVEMENT 2-Unsatisfactory by attendees
-Presence of two (2) evidences e. Documentation/Pictorials
1-Poor -Presence of one( 1)evidence
 Required Evidences
•Visited parents of a. Letter to Parents/ Guardians &
students needing June 2018 5-Outstanding -Presence of all five(5) evidences Principal /Permission for home
academic monitoring/ to 4-Very Satisfactory -Presence of four(4) evidences visitation
follow-up within the April 2019 3- Satisfactory -Presence of three (3) evidences b. Anecdotal Records
rating period (5%) 2- Unsatisfactory -Presence of two (2) evidences c. Home Visitation Form
1-Poor - Presence of one( 1)evidence d. Record of Attendance
e. Feedback/ Progress Report with
documentation
5- Outstanding
-100% and above project accomplishment with full
•Undertaken/ initiated
documentation report on completion
projects/events/ June 2018
4- Very Satisfactory
activities with to
-88-99% project accomplishment with partial completion  Projects/ events/ activities
external funding/ April 2019
3- Satisfactory initiated/ undertaken
sponsorship within
-77-87% project initiative only with no completion report
the target date (5%)
2- Unsatisfactory
-39-76% project initiative only with no completion report
1-Poor No project/event/activity initiated
5- Outstanding
-3 Action research conducted with full documentation on
completion and interventions
4- Very satisfactory
Conducted action -2 Action research conducted with full documentation on
research related to June 2018 completion and interventions
school or classroom to 3- Satisfactory
 Action research
concerns/ problems April 2019 -1 Action research conducted with full documentation on
during the year (5%) completion and interventions
2- Unsatisfactory
-Identified classroom/learning problems with research
proposals
D. 1 - Poor
PROFESSIONAL 15%
-Only classroom / learning problems/issues identified
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT 5- Outstanding
-Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with
documented results
Initiated / Participated 4- Very Satisfactory
in co-curricular/ June 2018 - Initiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities
school activities to with documented results  Professional Membership and
within the rating April 2019 3- Satisfactory or community linkages
period (3%) -participated in most of co-curricular/school activities with
documented results
2- Unsatisfactory
-Participation only without documented results
1-Poor - No participation in school activities
 Earned relevant
5-Outstanding -Earned at least 30 units in MA degree
professional June 2018
4-Very Satisfactory -Earned at least 27 units in MA degree
trainings, earned to  Transcript of Records
3-Satisfacotry -Earned at least 18 units in MA degree
units or graduated April 2019  Certification
2-Unsatisfactory -Earned at least 9 units in MA degree
from a higher
1-Poor -Earned at least 6 units in MA degree
relevant degree (3%)
5-Outstanding
Required Evidences:
-At least one(1) training / seminar abroad
a. Certificate of Appearance/
3. Attended 4-Very Satisfactory
Participation
June 2018 -At least one(1) national and Regional seminar /training
trainings, seminars, b. Official Receipt
to 3-Satisfactory
workshops, or c. Memorandum
April 2019 - At least one(1)Division/ District seminar /training/
conferences (2%) d. Travel Order/Authority to Travel
conference
e. Pictures/Official Documentation
2-Unsatisfactory
f. Narrative Report
-At least one (1) school seminar/ training/ conference
g. Echo Seminar
1-Poor -No Seminar/training/conference attended
Received special 5- Outstanding -National Award/Citation/Recognition
awards/citation/ June 2018 4- Very Satisfactory -Regional Award/Citation/Recognition
to 3- Satisfactory -Division Award/Citation/Recognition
recognition for  Trophies / Certificates
April 2019 2- Unsatisfactory -District Award/Citation/Recognition
exemplary
1-Poor -School Award/Citation/Recognition
performance (2%)
OVER-ALL
RATING OF
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the
100% ASSESSMENT
weight assigned. DESCRIPTIVE
RATING

_LHESLY B. BINONGO_ _Ma. Louisa A. Payac__

Ratee Rater

Adjectival Rating Scale Certified true and correct:

Outstanding 4.500 - 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 - 4.499 __Alfon M. Tiengo_
Satisfactory 2.500 - 3.499 Principal II
Unsatisfactory 1.500 - 2.499
Poor 1.000 - 1.499