د
Master apical file (MAF) MAY BE DEFINE AS A THREE SIZES LARGER THAN
THE FIRST FILE THAT BINDS AT THE FULL WORKING LENGTH PASSIVELY
AFTER STRAIGHT LINE ACCESS. ALSO CAN BE DEFINDED AS A LARGEST
FILE USED AT THE WORKING LENGTH PSSIVELY AFTER STRAIGHT LINE
ACCESS.
In the other word, if a size 10 file put into a relatively small canal but is loose
and does not remove dentin, it does not bind. In the same canal a size 20 or 25 files does
work against the canal walls but does not reach the apical portion of the canal. A size 15
does reach the apical portion and the file cut against the wall; thus it is the initial size of
that binds at the full working length, and the master apical file for this canal was size
30. The classic test for determining correct width of any canal preparation has been that
finding of clean white dentin shavings on the flute of the reamers and files. This test is
relatively incorrect. Many canals are oval or ribbon shaped in cross section. Clean white
dentin shavings are attainable from walls close to each other, but the far walls may be
completely untouched while this sign is obtain.
1
Lecture six--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- احمد غانم.د
Step-back Technique
(Also known as flaring or serial preparation).
The "Step Back" method indicates that the dentist works from the bottom of the canal
back towards the crown.
The step-back technique done, by dividing the preparation into two phases.
Phase I: is the apical preparation starting at the apical constriction. Apical area is
prepared up to #30 file with recapitulation by using prior size files and irrigation with
2ml after each instrument .
Phase II is the preparation of the reminder of the canal, gradually stepping back while
increasing in size. The preparation step back up the canal in 0.5mm increments from
#30 file through #45 file. Recapitulation is with #30 file to full working length.
The completion of the preparation is the refining phase IIA and IIB to produce a perfect
continuing taper from the apex to coronal area.
Refining IIA done using Gates-Glidden drills 2, and 3 to create coronal and middle root
preparation.
Refining phase IIB is done by using #30 file, through circumferential filing smoothes
step back to produce a perfect continuing taper from the apex to the cervical portion of
the canal.
2
Lecture six--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- احمد غانم.د
Coronal-Apical Techniques
1. Step-down Technique.
2. Double-flare Technique
3. Continuous Wave Shaping.
4. Crown-down Pressureless Technique
In "Crown-Down Pressureless technique". the dentist essentially works from the crown
of the tooth, shaping the canal as he or she moves towards the apex.
General guide lines:
Begin at the coronal portion, The first instruments are Gates Gliddens The
instruments are used in a large to small sequence.
The Peeso Reamers or Hedstrom files follow in the mid-root region
Continue down the canal, reducing the size of each file as you get closer to the
apex
Your goal is to achieve a funnel shape.
Finally, progressively smaller files take the dentist towards the apex.
Preparation of the coronal part of the canal system first is now considered to be
superior as these results in a number of significant advantages:
1. Most of the microorganisms will be in the coronal third of the root canal system
.Hydrostatic pressure can occur within the root canal if working length confirmation
or apical preparation is initiated at the start of preparation because the file will act
like a piston in a cylinder and this pressure may force pulp debris, dentine chips,
irrigant solution and microorganisms through the apical foramen.
2. Early coronal flaring allows better penetration of the irrigant solution.
3. Also, early flaring of the coronal part of the canal system prevents binding of the
instruments as they are unencumbered throughout most of their length
4. And also give better access to the apical part of root canal.
5. These concepts lead to the advocating of the coronal-apical preparation. When a
dentist instruments a molar with a hand file and feels the #25 or #30 binding, the
impression historically has been that the file is binding in the apical few millimeters.
In actuality the file is not binding in the apical third. It is binding in the coronal half
of the tooth. Therefore, when we use a crown down technique, we eliminate the
cervical constricture and by opening up the coronal half first, we now let a file
proceed unhindered into the apical third of the canal.
6. The result of this is an increased tactile awareness in the apical third of the canal. By
having a file that is not binding in the coronal half of the tooth, we now have a file
that possesses exquisite proprioceptive abilities. Additionally, the crown down
technique enhances the efficacy of our irrigation agent, which we recommend as
3
Lecture six--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- احمد غانم.د
either 2.6% or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. The result of this is an increased tactile
awareness in the apical third of the canal. By having a file that is not binding in the
coronal half of the tooth, we now have a file that possess exquisite proprioceptive
abilities
.
Method of Crown-down Pressureless Technique
As described by Morgan and Montgomery (1984). A #35 file was inserted or glide
to the point of first resistance without using apical pressure. This file was used as a
depth guide to use files of larger sizes and the Gates-Glidden drills. Files #40 through
60 and #2. #3 Gates-Glidden drills were then used to the same length by outward
stroking of the instruments without using apical force (each instrument used should be
followed by 2ml irrigation). Next a provisional working length (PWL) is established
from pre-operative x-ray film at a point 3mm short of radiographic apex starting with
the insertion of a #35 file. When the binding of the file against the canal walls was
noticed, the file was rotated clockwise two full revolutions (720 degree) without apical
pressure. The sequence was repeated with successively smaller files until the PWL was
reached. The canal is prepared the same way with size 40 and 45 files until FWL was
reached. The full working length (FWL) is then verified with a X-ray. Then a #40 file
was inserted and rotated clockwise two full revolutions without apical pressure. This is
repeated with successively smaller files until the FWL was reached. Finally the apical
cleaning and shaping is completed with #15 through #30 files by using a push-pull
circumferential motion.
4
Lecture six--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- احمد غانم.د
1. Ultrasonic Technique.
2. Sonic Preparation
Hybrid Techniques
Most experienced operators mix the desirable aspects of different techniques used
for instrumentation of the root canal. The most techniques are differ little from any
other, the important aspect being that the operator is aware of the limitation of each
technique to suit individual needs and the instructions of each technique should be
not followed as
‘cook-book’ style, except in the early stages of learning.
Lasers.
Reduced-Pressure Technique
5
Lecture six--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- احمد غانم.د