Certainly, the most dramatic hazard associated VAC-U-MAX, the leading manufacturer of indus-
with dust is secondary explosion. So dramatic trial vacuum cleaning systems for production lines
that it captured the attention of Congress which and other dust-intensive areas, developed the first
led to a bill that directed OSHA to “Issue an In- air-operated industrial vacuum cleaner to prevent
terim Combustible Dust Rule and an Amendment dust explosions.
to the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) in
90 days, and a final rule in 18 months,” according Although it can be argued that current OSHA stan-
to OSHA’s Combustible Dust; Advance Notice of dards are ambiguous, hence OSHA’s proposed
Proposed Rule-making. rule-making on combustible dust, the standards,
however daunting to sift through, are clearly noted
With over 4,900 violations associated with OSHA’s in OSHA’s Safety and Health Information Bulletin
Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program entitled Combustible Dust in Industry: Preventing
(NEP), the recent news releases about the orga- and Mitigating the Effects of Fire and Explosions
nization leveling fines at four companies ranging that was first issued 5 years ago.
from $63,000 to $137,000, and increasing local
television coverage of combustible dust violations, Since OSHA is taking strong enforcement actions
it should now be clear that OSHA is serious about to address combustible dust hazards, facilities
enforcing current standards. must make reasonable efforts to mitigate combus-
tible dust hazards. VAC-U-MAX is dedicated to as-
In response to OSHA’s NEP, many Facility and sisting companies understand OSHA requirements
Safety Managers have revamped their house- and documentation referencing dust hazards and
keeping practices and added industrial vacuum compliance.
cleaners approved for use in Class II Div 2 areas
In addition, most NFPA standards referenced in Implementing industrial vacuum cleaners is one of
the combustible dust SHIP recommend vacuum the most cost effective methods to handle fugi-
cleaning as the preferred first defense method for tive dust and avoid some of the most cited OSHA
controlling fugitive dust. NFPA 654 (2013) 8.2.2.2 violations regarding combustible dust and to
states, “vigorous sweeping or blowing down with protect facilities from catastrophic dust explosions.
steam or compressed air produces dust clouds
and shall be permitted only where the following re- Dust Explosions
quirements are met: 1) Area and equipment shall The three most recent dust explosions this year,
be vacuumed prior to blow-down.” two outside the US and one in Douglas County,
Oregon that all tolled killed 19 people and injured
Further reading of the standard reads “vigorous 53, serve as a reminder that secondary dust explo-
sweeping or blowing down with steam or com- sions are more destructive than primary explosions.
pressed air should only take place after the area Beyond creating dust clouds that, have the po-
or equipment has been vacuumed due to the cre- tential to ignite, sweeping or blowing dust during
ation of dust clouds by the other methods. With housekeeping routines causes powders to become
so many standards advocating the use of vacuum suspended and settle in hard to reach areas to
cleaners in the housekeeping process, one might reach, including beams and walls or areas that are
be surprised to find so few being used in facilities. hidden behind equipment or in very small spaces