(Proficient Teachers)
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood Bachelor of Secondary Education
Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18 units in Education
Experience None Required 12 years
Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET);
Eligibility RA 1080 September 25, 2014
Trainings None Required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with Education units (18-
21), at least 18 MA units
Experience
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 1 of 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: JOANNA MARIE S. DE LOS REYES Name of Rater: JUAN G. DELA CRUZ
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: ABCDE Central School Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, was shown
enhance learner writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in Quality numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills 5
literacy and as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
numeracy skills. MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
May 2018
to April 7.5% Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No 5 0.375
2019 least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons centered lessons centered lessons lesson as evidence
as shown in as shown in as shown in evidently shown was shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
Efficiency
supported by any supported by any supported by any given MOV 5
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies to
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinkling, as well Quality other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as 5
as other higher- shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills.
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons lesson as acceptable
as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by any evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 of the given was shown
Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV 5
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
classroom management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMEN strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
structure to
T AND engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
engage learners, in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
DIVERSITY OF individually or in Quality 5
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
LEARNERS groups, in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
meaningful rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
explanation, May 2018
discovery and to April 7.5% 5 0.375
hands-on 2019 Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
activities within a least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson supported acceptable
supported by supported by supported by by any of the evidence
range of physical
learning Efficiency MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable MOV was shown 5
of the other of the other of the other
environments. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: JOANNA MARIE S. DE LOS REYES Name of Rater: JUAN G. DELA CRUZ
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: ABCDE Central School Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 1 of 4
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMEN strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
constructively by
T AND learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
applying positive that promote that promote that promote that promote
DIVERSITY OF and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
LEARNERS discipline to violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
ensure learning-
Quality
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in 5
focused MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
environments. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the of the given acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only was shown
Efficiency least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
PLANNING implemented
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was shown
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced learning process learning process learning process learning process
teaching and Quality as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in 5
learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
processes to rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
May 2018 least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
to April 7.5% developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence 5 0.375
2019 sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV
Efficiency
and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 5
any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV
given MOV
3. 7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
INDIVIDUAL
processes to
PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT
meet curriculum AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
requirements and
Name of Employee: JOANNA MARIE S. DE LOS REYES
varied teaching Name of Rater: JUAN G. DELA CRUZ
contexts.
Position: Teacher I May 2018 Position: Principal I
District/School: ABCDE Central School to April 7.5% Date of Review: October 2018 5 0.375
2019
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 2 of 4
3. CURRICULUM 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
AND LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence
discussions that
PLANNING meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to was shown
use teacher and discuss discuss discuss discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
practice.
Quality
enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction
5
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
FGDs/meetings meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
Efficiency the given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
4.
Name of Employee: 10. Designed,MARIE S. DE LOS REYES
JOANNA Name of Rater: JUAN G. DELA CRUZ
selected,
Position: Teacher
organizedI and Position: Principal I
used diagnostic,
District/School: ABCDE Central
formative and School Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May summative
2018 to April 2019
assessment
strategies
consistent with TO BE FILLED OUT
curriculum TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
requirements.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
May 2018 ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory SCORE
to April 7.5%
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) RESULTS Q E T 5
AVE 0.375
2019 Satisfactory (4) (2)
Timeliness
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 3 of 4
4. ASSESSMENT 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
AND evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence
progress and
REPORTING progress and progress and progress and and achievement was shown
achievement achievement achievement achievement using learner
using learner
attainment data.
Quality using learner using learner using learner attainment data 5
attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in
as shown in as shown in as shown in MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
May 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable evidence 5
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: JOANNA MARIE S. DE LOS REYES Name of Rater: JUAN G. DELA CRUZ
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
District/School: ABCDE Central School Date of Review: October 2018
Rating Period: May 2018 to April 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Approving Authority:
//SGOD-gpm©2018 Page 4 of 4
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
related
works/activities that
contribute to the
teaching-learning
process
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
5 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
to succeed with minimal resources.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality,
costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY
RATINGS
//SGOD-gpm©2018
PETENCIES
3.33
3.33
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Functional Competencies
//SGOD-gpm©2018
EVELOPMENT PLANS
RESOURCES NEEDED
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
District/School: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA MOV TARGET RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA MOV TARGET RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
//SGOD-gpm©2018
PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM
SIGNATURE
(Rater/Ratee)
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom
observation. Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curricuum teaching areas
Note: For schools with only one observer (i.e., Principal), this form serve as the final rating sheet.
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom
observation. Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
//SGOD-gpm©2018
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
//SGOD-gpm©2018
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS:
//SGOD-gpm©2018
ANNOTATION
ANNOTATIONS