The Creator Formula - The Proof of God! (Sample)

2
The
C.R.E.A.T.O.R.
Formula
Written By
Sollog Immanuel Adonai-Adoni
Sollog’s website www.Sollog.com
Electronic Copyright 2002 Adoni Publishing

www.1Adoni.com
Version 20021008-01
1st Edition 1997
Distributed Electronically through 1 E Books

www.1eBooks.com
Any distribution or copying of this eBook is strictly prohibited without the expressed
written permission of the Publisher. All copyright rights expressed or implied are
claimed and protected by the Publisher.
3
Author’s Note
This update of The Creator Formula was originally scheduled for July 2002.
In updating it I discovered some major new ratio laws validating my original
work known as The Creator Formula.
The first major discovery is simple ratio proof validating the Creator Formula,
I call it The PROOF of the Creator Formula. This PROOF shows a unique
ratio between inner planets and earth. They proof the inners planets were
designed around Earths measurements!
After this ratio was found, it lead to me being introduced to an old law known
as Titius-Bodes. I redesigned that law to create distance ratios to the sun.
This lead to my major new work known as PDF – Planet Distance Formula. It
is a perfect mathematical model of our solar system that explains the known
orbit of every planet. Something no one has ever been able to do. This
formula PROVES the solar system had originally 18 planets aligned exactly
like a carbon 12 atom!
I give exact locations for all 18 planets. Some are about to be discovered in
the near future exactly where my formula predicts they will be!
I have tried to write this solar model in a simple manner so almost anyone
can understand it.
This solar system model will in a short time rewrite the whole concept of
physics. I have said since 1995 the math in our dimension is all wrong, it is
too flat and not dimensional. This solar model introduces dimensional math
and how multiple laws react to each other within dimensional space. Three
sets of planets exist in our solar system all obeying slightly different laws!
Due to the major discoveries I have made from July 2nd to July 11th 2002, this
book has been updated five times! I hope you enjoy it.
Sollog
July 11th 2002
4
Forward 2002
I originally revealed The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula in 1995 in the City of

Philadelphia in a series of ads in several area newspapers.
Since that time I have authored many books dealing with theology,
mathematics and mysticism. To date, I have authored over 30 books.
I have updated this book to contain some of my new discoveries and writings
on important topics, such as my earthquake theories. I have had also
included some of my more famous Prophecies within this work.
All of my work hinges upon my connection to The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula. It

is the key to my writings. Not one scientist has publicly tried to refute any
numbers within my formula. The reason is they can’t!
This formula proves beyond doubt that the earth exists within a created
Universe! It proves the earth’s measurements were used to design other
planets and orbits!
I have publicly predicted exact dates and even locations for major 7.0+ range
earthquakes. Something the bible says ONLY GOD CAN DO!
My religious belief can be simply stated that GOD exists within all living
things. I AM GOD and so is everyone else.
The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula PROVES a CREATOR exists, since it proves

the earth’s measurements WERE DESIGNED!
My writings such as The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula and my Prophecies have

made me one of the most discussed people in the world on the Internet.
Many who read The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula write to me afterwards and tell
me THEY NOW BELIEVE IN GOD! It is THE PROOF OF GOD!
I hope you enjoy this updated version of The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula!
Shalom
Sollog
5
Forward (Original)
C.R.E.A.T.O.R. is an acronym for Circumference Ratio Earth And The Orbit

Rotation. It is the PROOF that man’s religions share a common source!
In 1995 in the City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania, I revealed what is now

known as The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula. I and many other people believe this
formula is the literal MATHEMATICAL PROOF of GOD!
In The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula, I show how two symbols that are in the
creation myths of seven major religions are the actual Formula for the perfect
circumference of the earth. The work is written in all capitals, a style I felt
obligated to use in 1995 as I revealed this work. Perhaps it is why Hebrew
has no case difference in the Hebrew alphabet. Maybe GOD only uses
capital letters.
This Formula unites seven major religious beliefs to ONE GOD. It is the
PROOF that the earth was created, the earth is the mathematical center of
the Universe and that all major beliefs are from ONE GOD who put the
symbols of The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula into all major beliefs.
In this book, I will show you how the mathematical measurements of the
earth are the basis of measurement of every planet and their orbits in what I
call, The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula!
I have also included several other Math formulas in this work that were
revealed by me in or near 1995. I have even included various other writings
from 1995 that I wrote near the time of The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula. They
are included under Discoveries, Prophecies, Writings and Poems.
One of these works is known as The POINT of CREATION, which is a theory

that gives a mathematical value to a POINT. Something modern math theory
says has no value. The value of THE POINT is what Einstein called his
Grand Unification Theory, in my opinion. This theory is the so-called HOLY
GRAIL that Einstein sought his whole life. It is a mathematical theory that
unites physics to theology.
I also revealed algorithms for Prime Numbers and the infinite universe of
exponents in 1995; they are included in this book as well.
6
I have appeared on many radio shows over the years due to my claims of
prophetic abilities and the past successes of some of my more infamous
prophecies. My prophecies and my writings are divinely inspired. I take no
credit for them. They manifest from THE GOD WITHIN ALL.
7
Publishers Note
Some of the pages in this book contain Prophecies.
Sollog is known to use both literal and allegorical numbers in his Prophecies.
So an actual date like a year can mean several things.
It can be a literal date, or it can be an allegorical date.
Sollog has hit exact dates for future events.
So be careful in judging any hard dates you think you read in this book.
Since Sollog is known to reverse numbers and turn them upside down in his
Prophecies.
For instance the year 1999 can be 6661 upside down in either the Hebrew or
Western calendar.
1999 can also be 9991 in reverse.
Just a note so you may understand the way Sollog writes some of his
Prophecies.
8
Index
Mathematical Discoveries of Sollog
Update – PDF – Planetary Distance Formula
C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula - Proof of God

Titius-Bodes-Sollog – The Planet Distance Formula
Algorithm of Primes I & II
Algorithm of Exponents – Fermat’s Lost Proof
Secret of the Pyramids – Connection to Zodiac
The Point of Creation – Value of a point
GOD of Quakes – The Line of Ennosageus
Earthquake Warnings
911
902 Prophecy
Asteroid 2002 MN
Asteroid 1999 VP11
The Church of Satan
Writings of Sollog
The Signs - Days of Judgment - Prophecies
Poems of Sollog
Stories of Sollog
The Future
The Safe Zones
About Sollog
9
Mathematical Discoveries
10
Addendum to the CREATOR Formula
Since 1995 a few figures have changed in regards to numbers used now by
NASA as to the estimated circumferences and orbits of planets in our solar
system.
These changes have further improved the CREATOR Formula, since new
information has come to light PROVING the intelligent design to our planets
more clearly.
In this work I have revealed two sets of RATIOS that prove INTELLIGENT
design, in regards to the circumferences of Mercury, Mars, Jupiter and
Saturn to orbital measurements unique to Earth!
For instance, the circumferences of both Mercury and Saturn are clearly
DESIGNED based upon the relationship between these planets and their
distance to the sun relative to the Earth.
There is also another ratio relationship between Mars and Jupiter to Earth in
regards to their circumference ratios being based upon the ratio between
their orbits of the sun relative to the Earth.
When you see the simple ratios within my updated CREATOR FORMULA
that clearly establishes beyond doubt SCIENTIFIC PROOF of a clearly
DESIGNED ratio relationship between Earth and the planets within our solar
system, you will most likely be amazed and perhaps even awed that an
intelligence could design this beautiful planet so clearly connected to the
main measurements of other heavenly bodies.
You will see the obvious INTELLIGENT DESIGN RATIOS between the
planets on the next few pages of my work titled “THE CREATOR FORMULA
– The PROOF of God!” These relationships would not just happen to have
formed in a Universe of Chaos! These scientifically validated ratios are clear
PROOF of a planned DESIGN to the circumferences of planets in our Solar
System based upon measurements unique to Earth! It is the PROOF of
GOD!
11
P.D.F.
Planetary Distance Formula
A large scale model explaining the formation of the Solar System
By Sollog Immanuel Adonai-Adoni
July 11th 2002
Edited October 8th 2002
This work is a large-scale theoretical model that explains the PDF - Planetary Distance
Formula of our solar system. In time as new planets are discovered, the formulas within
my model will be validated as the correct model to explain the simple astro-mechanics of
our solar system.
This simple model is based upon something we have tried to observe for quite some time.
That is the carbon 12 atom. Yes, my solar model resembles in great detail a carbon 12
atom.
Can it be that humans, a complex carbon life form, actually live on a planet within a solar
system designed to resemble a carbon 12 atom?
My model explains such anomalies as the asteroid belt, the formation of huge gas giants
and the abnormalities of Venus and Neptune to other planets in our known solar system at
this time.
The most important PROOF to show that this model is correct; is there will in the very near
future be several discoveries of new planets in our solar system.
The orbits of these unknown planets will align correctly to my theorized orbits. This is the
only PROOF that can really validate a theoretical work such as this.
If the known qualities of the solar system fit the model and it predicts accurate future
unknown variables but probabilities correctly, then such a model can be considered
correct.
Some long held truths will be completely shattered in my work. New ideas about the solar
system and the universe will be put forward that will become accepted facts in the future
as my model is validated by the discovery of new planets that fit my model precisely and
invalidate other models as incorrect.
A few theories such as Titius-Bodes (an old planetary distance law see footnotes) will be
completely rebuilt to explain a doubling law that is built into most if not all life.
Titius-Bodes is slightly incorrect in the big model of the solar system that I am revealing
here. However, it did serve its purpose in trying to explain a key to my model, which is a
doubling law. A variation of Titius-Bodes aligns two of the three sets of numbers I use.
12
Titius-Bodes is to me nothing more than a doubling law that I call 1 3 7 (the "fine-structure
constant" of quantum electrodynamics - see footnotes). Physicists will immediately smile
and say, okay an attempt to explain 137.
My theoretical doubling law that I call the Law of 1 3 7 is a universal constant that explains
planetary distance formation. It also explains why Titius-Bodes works to some degree.
The reason Titius-Bodes cannot fully explain the solar system is that the solar system is
actually built around three separate groups or sets of numbers that are simply aligned to
each other. Such an ordered alignment for three types of particles/planets does exist
within a carbon 12 atom, and it is a key part of my model of our solar system. The
similarities are clear.
The reason no one has seen this alignment of orbital numbers before, is that many of the
key planets needed to prove that this alignment of orbital numbers was real no longer
exist. So my theoretical orbits must for now show the alignment of the three groups of
numbers. However, the discovery of new orbital numbers from unknown planets in the
future will correctly align to the sets I explain in this work, and that will validate that my
theorized missing orbits must have existed in the distant past when the solar system was
very young.
Our solar system is now very mature and the orbits are quite stable, however as simple
observable models show, a newly established gravitational field is quite unstable in the
beginning until a certain synchronization manifests aligning the various parts. I will explain
this a littler more in just a bit.
Some of my earlier work such as the Creator Formula (Circumference Ratio Earth Aligned
To Orbital Ratios - see foot notes) and my recent PROOF for the Creator Formula (a clear
ratio relationship between Earth to Mercury/Mars/Jupiter/Saturn) are validated in this work.
A problem some found with my earlier work the PROOF for the Creator Formula is the
Venus exception or anomaly. This exception rule is now easily explained. Venus should
not align to Earths orbital ratios as the other inner planets do! The PROOF for the Creator
Formula just explained that Venus is an exception to an observable ratio relationship
between Earth and the majority of the inner planets.
The PROOF of the Creator Formula shows the same type of alignment ordering of
numbers similar to what occurs within a carbon 12 atom to the Earth’s inner planets
perfectly.
My solar model creates three sets of numbers that are all aligned to a simple doubling law
that I call 1 3 7. It resembles Titius-Bodes, but only in the fact it uses doubling.
Titius-Bodes observed a possible doubling rule of order but it never theorized that three
sets of numbers for this rule existed in our solar system.
Now that I have discovered that three separate sets of orbital alignments exist in our solar
system, the concept of Titius-Bodes can be easily understood.
13
Pi is also a key in my model, and part of the reason is that our planets create in some
instances near perfect circles in their orbits. So a bunch of circles should have some type
of Pi ratio just by the geometrical properties inherent in circles.
I have divided this model into several parts, the first three parts deals with the clear
alignment of numbers in the orbits of 18 planets. You might be saying how can I use 18
orbits when we only know about half that many.
My model theorizes orbits that don’t exist any longer and it also theorizes orbits of planets
that we have yet to discover.
While I cannot empirically prove an orbit once existed in the asteroid belt, it will be
accepted in the future that several most likely did as other orbits of unknown planets are
found that validate my solar model.
A few other orbits that also no longer exist are in my solar model. They no longer exist due
to the simple fact the planets that once held those orbits were absorbed into young gas
giants like Jupiter and Saturn.
I have never read any major works on astro-physics, since I have my own understanding
of the quantum mechanics of our universe. So what I know of other theories about the
idea that planets may have collided is little more than some have theorized some planets
may have formed by slow collisions and other planets may have collided to form the
asteroid belt.
These ideas could have been taught to me in school as a child or I may have been
exposed to these ideas via shows on PBS or whatever.
My interests in life were never astro-physics related. So I didn’t research the whole gamut
of ideas out there. My interests in the past 7 years have been geared toward theology and
occult knowledge. I use some of this esoteric knowledge to fully explain certain numbers
where chosen as starting points in my formulas!
I have always enjoyed playing with numbers, but I don’t really make it a hobby.
I am interested in the truth, and what is observable in our solar system has lead me to
explore within my own database of knowledge a method to explore and explain all of
these numbers.
This all being said, my model suggests not only an asteroid belt from the collision of two
young planets, but also planets that had to have once orbited near the gas giants that no
longer exist. Where did these missing planets go? They were merged or absorbed into the
young gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn!
This may or may not be an earth shattering idea. However, the location of these missing
planets is something I don’t believe anyone has ever put forth in a solid solar model to
explain this theory.
When outer planets are found that align to planets such as Neptune and Uranus, then my
missing planet orbits have to be accepted as factual. So here are my three sets of orbits.
14
The numbers I use for known planets are correct as of today since they are the numbers
supplied to me by NASA. While you can look up the actual numbers for our known planets
for yourself at sites like NASA, the numbers I use for the missing planets are figures for
planets that are long gone. But, there will soon be several new planets found in our solar
system that align to my model and thereby validate the whole work!
15
Three Numerical Sets of Orbits
The first set of orbits that are aligned to each other is the easiest to verify since four of the
planets still exist.
These planets that are aligned to each other are
Mercury/Earth/Mars/Planet X - Niribu/Jupiter/El-Sollog
The orbit of Planet X is in the asteroid belt. Ancient Myths say this was Niribu. So I will call
Planet X Niribu. The orbit of the theoretical planet El-Sollog is near the orbit of Saturn.
This is a missing planet that merged with Saturn.
When I set out the relationship of these planets we will have a theoretically orbit for Niribu
that is aligned to the other five planets in a simple doubling law similar to Titius-Bodes but
not exactly Titius-Bodes. I have modified their so-called n set of numbers.
The rule of doubling and adding a variable might have been first theorized by Titius-
Bodes. However, long before I had ever heard of Titius-Bodes I had theorized the law or
rule of doubling for 1 3 7.
The best way for me to explain what 1 3 7 means to physicists is that it is the "fine-
structure constant" of quantum electrodynamics. It is considered by some to be almost the
glue that holds atoms together.
While I make no claims to be an expert on quantum electrodynamics, I will admit that I
have written many computer programs over the years, since I spent most of my adult life
running a computer programming company.
When I was quite young, someone bought up the concept of 1 3 7 to me as in an
argument, “Okay you’re so smart with numbers explain 1 3 7 to me.”
I probably had to ask in what manner were the numbers being used. I most likely would
have noticed a relationship to my birth date of 7/14 or 14/7 in Euro dating. I knew from my
father’s mother that 1 4 7 was her lucky numbers. She told me as child she started playing
them after I was born in the so-called daily number and at the track. She said they always
seemed to hit for her.
So as a child I was indoctrinated in how 1 4 7 were lucky numbers.
Anyway, at that point in the argument I was probably given a simple overview of 1 3 7.
I do remember what my reply was. “It’s simple, it’s a law of double add one. You start with
ONE, you double and then add one, then double then add one. This simple statement
produced 1 3 7 and I thought nothing much of it again for many years other than whenever
someone seemed to comment on the mysteries of 1 3 7 I would say, “Haven’t you heard
of the law of double and add one?” I would then explain what I theorized at around the age
of 13 to whoever was discussing the great significance of 1 3 7 to me at that time. I’d had
maybe a few dozen discussions before I theorized my PDF formula in my lifetime, where I
explained the law of doubling or 137 to someone.
16
When I was first exposed to Titius-Bodes, all of less than a week ago, I immediately saw
my 1 3 7 Law in it. At first I tried to tweak what some considered some great secret of the
solar system. At first I was impressed with how close Titius-Bodes was. I then realized it
was totally wrong and would not correctly locate future orbits without more manipulation of
my addition variation to Titius - Bodes (a simple variable I created to improve Titius-Bodes
a few days ago - see foot notes).
I use the law of 1 3 7 in all two of the three sets of my orbital numbers in my model. It is
not pure 1 3 7 as I knew it originally, but it is a simple double a number to start and then
add a constant variable. Some will say it is Titius-Bodes. It is not. It is the natural law of
doubling inherent in all living things.
It is 1 3 7 with perhaps a dash of Titius-Bodes.
This first set of six orbits starts like Titius-Bodes with two numbers. The first number adds
the variable to create the first orbit or Mercury. Then like Titius-Bodes the first number is
not doubled. My other two formulas that create sets of orbits are slightly different. One
starts with a number and then keeps doubling. While another one subtracts a fraction of
2/3 to create the numbers for orbits. So one may say Titius-Bodes is 1/3 relevant to my
model.
Titius-Bodes starts with 0 and 3 as the first two numbers. Once three is in the picture
Titius-Bodes starts doubling and adding .40 or 4/10.
My first set of numbers like Titius-Bodes contain a zero as a starting point, but my second
number is not 3 or .3 (I use fractions so I don’t have to divide by 10 as Titius Bodes does)
it is .60. As in 60 the year I was born. As in 60, the base math of the Babylonians.
My variable in the first set of numbers is .40 like Titius-Bodes, so my variable and .60
make unity or one. “ONE is all there is”, is a favorite saying of mine. So what better place
to start than a couple of numbers that make unity. Seems simple enough right? Oh, the
first number becomes .40 due to adding the variable of .40 to zero. So the total sum of the
first number and the variable of .40 by adding the second number to it is once again unity
or one.
Titius Bodes originally looked like this.
= (n + 4)/10
where n = (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384)
My first set formula is very similar
= n +.4
where n = (0, .6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6)
Titius bodes does not try to explain why 0 and then 3. As I explained above unity is the
basis of my first formula.
17
By deleting 3 from my first formula I am excluding the backwards planet Venus from my
first aligned set of numbers. This validates my PROOF of the Creator Formula. Venus
does not belong in any formulas that try to align earth to other inner planets. Venus is
actually part of another set of numbers aligned to Neptune and a doubling of Pi.
With my numbers above I create near perfect orbits for the first six planets of my model.
Earth and Jupiter are perfectly aligned with this formula based upon earth as 1 AU. These
are the larger two of the four still existing planets created by the first formula. The reason
Earth and Jupiter are still perfectly aligned could be due to how much bigger than the
other planets they are. Also the moon of earth could be a reason the earth has stayed in
the original orbit designed for it. It is theorized that with time most or all of the planets will
gravitate closer if not into the sun.
.40 (Mercury)
1.00 (Earth)
1.60 (Mars)
2.80 (Planet X - Niribu - Asteroid Belt)
5.20 (Jupiter)
10.00 (El Sollog)
Titius-Bodes never tried to explain why certain orbits were slightly off in their theory. Titius-
Bodes also tried to align Saturn to this formula. Saturn is aligned to a third set of numbers.
If we did not use the Titius-Bodes variable of .4, then Saturn is perfectly aligned to 9.6 AU.
However, in Titius-Bodes you have Saturn lumped into a simple group of all the planets.
Saturn merged with the original planet in my first set of planets, a planet that once existed
close to Saturn at 10 AU.
That planet is El-Sollog. El is the ancient name of GOD in Hebrew. El is the number 31 in
Kabbalah. 31 is Pi^3 with a remainder of .00006.
I have chosen to append my own name to this planet named for GOD, since it is my belief
GOD inspired me to create this correct model for our solar system. It is my belief my
model demonstrates clearly that an intelligence designed the solar system. I won’t debate
that point in this work, but I will in a later work.
So I am giving GOD credit by naming the planet that was in a PERFECT 10 orbit EL-
Sollog. I as a mere servant of GOD get a footnote.
The theoretical orbit of Planet X or Niribu is 2.8 AU.
That puts Niribu in the Asteroid Field between Mars and Jupiter.
So far so good, we have 6 orbits, two of missing planets, one of the missing planets left a
trail called the asteroid belt. The only debatable point is if a planet in a 10 AU orbit had a
slow collision with Saturn in a 9.6 Orbit. Like I said, I don’t plan on proving the missing
18
planets existed in this work. I merely explain where they had to have been and supply a
formula that will accurately predict the orbits of planets about to be discovered. When
these planets are discovered and they align to my solar model, then the PROOF the
missing planets at one time existed will have been given!
Another good reason to think Saturn somehow absorbed another planet, is to try to
explain why Saturn and Jupiter are so much larger than the rest of the planets. Absorption
due to a slow collision makes perfect sense. I am not the first to say this is a possible way
some planets are formed.
Now I will explain the formula for my second set of numbers that locates 6 additional orbits
of planets. This set contains three known planets and a theorized orbit for a planet yet to
be discovered. It also contains two orbits of planets that no longer exist. One planet is
most likely to have collided in the asteroid belt with Planet X or Niribu. I call this missing
planet the Planet Y which is short for Yod. The other missing planet I have named Planet
Z short for Zeda or Zeta to fans of the channeled work many or discussing. This planet
merged or was absorbed into Jupiter.
In an interesting side note, the Zeta’s foretold their planet would be discovered in July
2002. Well it has. Only it no longer exists. The Zeta’s are an entity that is confused their
world was destroyed
They are similar to a ghost on a television set. They are a sort of interference, that doesn’t
belong in the picture.
Can I prove two planets existed near each other in orbits in the asteroid belt? No. But,
when other planets are found that align to orbits I have given in this solar model, these
planet will then be taken to have existed for fact!
Can I prove a planet existed near the orbit of Jupiter that was somehow absorbed or
merged into Jupiter? No! But, once again as other planets are found that align correctly to
my solar model these missing planets will be taken as fact!
This set of numbers is a blend of Titius-Bode, but there is no variable to insert. It is just
start here at one number and double, double, double.
This is the only set with no variable in the doubling.
This set contains mostly numbers from Titius-Bodes.
The first number or starting point is 2.4. Why 2.4?
Well since this solar model is based upon AU or a relationship to earths distance to the
sun, why not start with 10 percent of an earth day of 24 hours? One-one-thousandth of
earths circumference in miles is also 2.4. The ratio of 2 to 4 is .50. A perfect half. Four
divided by 2 is two. 2 is the first even number, it is the first number that can be squared.
2^2 is four. 2 is the only even number that is prime, while four is the first number that is not
prime. So 2 and 4 belong together for many reasons.
2 to 4 is also a simple explanation of the law of double as well.
19
So a starting point containing 2 and 4 is a well-designed location to start in my opinion.
Just like unity was our starting point in our first set of numbers, this number is our second
starting point.
The formula is simple
Start at 2.4 and DOUBLE five times!
2.4 - 4.8 - 9.6 - 19.2 - 38.4 - 76.8
The first location in this sequence is part of the asteroid belt. The fifth number in the
sequence is the Kuiper Belt.
Two of our known planets are perfectly aligned in AU to this sequence of numbers, the
gas giants Saturn and Neptune are where the third and fourth numbers in this sequence
suggest. The fifth number in this sequence is exactly where the Kuiper Belt is located, it is
where both Pluto and Quaoar now orbit. In the future Pluto will be considered nothing but
a moon of a planet that no longer exists. I call this missing planet Theth, in Hebrew it
means Ninth, and since this orbit is now associated with Pluto or the so-called ninth
planet, I thought Theth was a most appropriate name. Theth exploded and formed the
Kuiper Belt. The recently discovered object temporarily named Quaoar is a Pluto like
object only Quaoar has a near perfect circular orbit around the sun around 42.00 AU. The
original planet Theth, that no longer exists, was located near 38.40 AU or the heart of the
Kuiper Belt beyond Neptune. Pluto's erratic orbit can now be easily explained by
considering that it once orbited planet Theth along with it's moon Charon and Quaoar. A
collision or a core meltdown of the parent planet to Pluto (Theth) hurled Pluto into its
current erratic orbit. Gravity has averaged out the orbit of Pluto to around 36.00 AU,
though at times its orbit can be within Neptune and beyond the newly discovered Quaoar.
Quaoar most likely had a slight change of orbit from near 38.40 AU to around 42.00 AU
since it was not directly impacted by a direct blast when the parent planet of Pluto and
Quaoar (Theth) was destroyed. So the blast of Theth's destruction bumped the orbit of
Quaoar a little further from the Sun, and it dramatically altered the orbit of Pluto to what we
now see. If we average the orbits of Pluto and Quaoar we have the perfect orbit that my
theory suggests for Theth, that being 38.40 AU.
This is the first theory that explains properly Pluto's small size similar to a moon and it's
erratic orbit. It was a moon of Theth and is not a planet. The same thing can be said of
Quaoar, it was a moon of the same planet that Pluto was a moon to! The Kuiper Belt is
also explained with this theory. It is exactly where it should be if we consider planet Theth
once existed at 38.40 AU.
While many small objects have been found in the Kuiper Belt, very few will be spherical
planet/moon like objects such as Pluto and Quaoar. The only question is what destroyed
the original planet that Pluto and Quaoar once orbited that being planet Theth? Was it a
collision? Or was it a core meltdown from a defective core? The idea that the Kuiper Belt
is left over debris from early planetary formation is wrong. The Kupier Belt is exactly where
a planet should be! The Kupier Belt is estimated to be only one tenth the mass of earth.
That is hardly enough material to prove that some celestial quary to make planets was the
20
reason for the Kuiper Belt. A planet was at 38.40 AU as my theory suggests, it was Theth
and it exploded and formed the Kuiper Belt. Its moons were left behind, those being Pluto
and Quaoar and any other spherical objects found in the Kuiper Belt if any.
This formula predicts an orbit of a planet beyond Theth or the Kupier Belt, Pluto and
Quaoar. When one is located in the predicted orbit, then the theory of the other two orbits
that are for missing planets will be considered fact. Those are the missing orbits for Planet
Y and Z, good old Yod and Zeda.
Here are the numbers for my second set of planet orbits.
2.40 (Planet Y - Yod - Asteroid Belt )
4.80 (Planet Z - Zeda)
9.60 (Saturn)
19.20 (Uranus)
38.40 (Planet Theth - Kuiper Belt - Pluto - Quaoar)
76.80 (Planet U1)
Now it is time to give my third set of numbers for planetary orbits.
This set is nothing like the other two sets!
IT IS RADICALLY DIFFERENT!
It is my favorite set of numbers too, since it has two planetary orbit locations that have
undiscovered planets that in no way are near anything Titius-Bodes predicts.
This set of numbers also aligns pesty Venus and Neptune. They are the big anomalies in
our solar system. I explain why they are where they are in this formula!
Yes, you can say I saved the best part for last!
This set of orbits proves absolute design to this solar system. The factor of the doubling is
Pi. The variable is 2/3 or .666. The variable is a negative or minus. The starting points is a
classic esoteric number that is a major name in the bible in Gematria, that is ALPHA-
OMEGA!
Do you really want to argue proof of DESIGN in my solar system model when the key
UNKNOWN PLANETS that are discovered soon will be aligned perfectly to a formula that
begins with ALPHA-OMEGA as the starting point?
This is my third planetary orbit formula in my solar model.
= n - .666
where n = (1.332, Pi, Pi^2, Pi^3, 2Pi^3, 3Pi^3)
21
As you can see, THIS IS A COMPLEX AND INTELLIGENT SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS!
There is no way someone can say to me this was a random event. Why start at 1.332?
That is double .666 the variable. Why a variable of .666. Does not this whole model of a
solar system revolve around three sets of six numbers or three sixes? Now some will say
wow EVIL, is not EVIL backwards LIVE?
In gematria, the Greek THEOLOGY of numerology based upon the Greek Alphabet, the
number 666 was used for a bad person. Well in reality in ancient Greece 666 was a holy
number, since it is used to square a circle!
666 and 888 square a circle. By the way, in Greek gematria Jesus is 888.
Now in GREEK the name ALPHA-OMEGA has a value of 1332. Was the designer of the
solar system a GREEK?
The Alpha-Omega is unity or a circle. It is a symbol said to represent GOD, he who was
the first and he who shall be the last. Actually a circle has no beginning or an end so 1332
or double the variable of 666 represents unity in gematria. I’m sure there aren’t too many
astro-physicists walking around with such esoteric knowledge.
Now 666 is special to me also, since upside down 666 is 999. 999 is also NINES and my
birth name was ENNIS or an anagram of NINES. I guess I was destined to reveal this
solar model.
Venus and Neptune the two planets that destroy every typical solar model such as Titius-
Bodes, etc. are perfectly aligned to this third formula.
Two planet orbits no longer exist, but two unknown planet orbits are theorized by this
formula. These planets will validate this solar model in the future.
Another GODLY part of this formula is the fact Pi^3 appears. Pi^3 is 31.006. 31 in Hebrew
Kabbalah the equivalent of gematria is Aleph Lamed. Translated as GOD or EL. So
GOD’s main name in the Hebrew bible is encoded in the formula as Pi^3.
Is it coincidence or DIVINE DESIGN? I won’t argue the point in this work, but I will in a
later analysis of PDF.
In the future when planets are found that align to the theoretical location of orbits I have
given, well let’s just say this solar system model will do what Einstein searched his whole
life for. It will unite the physical world to physics and theology. It will be PROOF of Solar
design to scientists and theologists alike!
These are the orbital numbers produced by my third formula, I called it Pi^3.
666 (Venus)
2.475 (Juno)
9.2036 (Nikkee)
30.320 (Neptune)
22
62.012 (U2)
93.018 (U3)
The true Perihelion of Venus is .668 our .666 is actually .667, so this formula is aligned to
within .001 or the closest orbit of Venus to the Sun. That is not in AU it is in 10^8 miles.
The AU of Venus is considered to be .720.
The Perihelion of Neptune is 30.220, so we are once again within 1 to the third digit for a
Perihelion measurement of a planets orbit. No one has ever aligned both Venus and
Neptune in a formula within 1 to the third decimal place!
This means this formula creates the Perihelion of orbits. The other two formula creates
perfect AU’s. This formula creates Perihelion (10^8 miles). This is once again an argument
for DESIGN rather than random chance.
As unknown planets (U2 and U3) are found that align perfectly to this formula, it will
validate my solar model as being PROOF of Solar Design to our Solar System!
The second planetary orbit created in this formula is an orbit that once again places a
planet in the orbit of the asteroid belt. I doubt all three collided at the same time. The iron
asteroids in this orbit make it look like a very fast early collision occurred at the iron core
level of two young planets. It is quite possible that one of the planets of this triplet orbit
then spun out of control most likely into Jupiter. It could have been any of the three
asteroid distance orbit planets in any of the three sets. Which one it was is irrelevant.
However, I have decided to name the second planet in this set Juno. Juno is the wife of
Jupiter in mythology so when the triple planet orbit was broken by a collision of two
planets, Jupiter got his wife!
The third planet I have named Nikkee the Goddess of Victory. For Nikkee is my earthly
goddess companion/wife. So Nikkee of course merged with Saturn and El-Sollog.
So there we have it.
Three sets of six planets, the dreaded 666 that is also the basis of a carbon 12 atom, with
all the orbits to known planets perfectly aligned.
We have the orbits of planets that collided and created the asteroid belt. We have an
explanation as to why some gas planets are so large.
We have LOGICAL starting points in all the sets of numbers.
We have LOGICAL progression of the numbers creating perfect orbits to known planets.
In time the undiscovered planets will be found. They will align to my solar model, and in
the future Physics, Theology, Mathematics, Philosophy, Astronomy and Science all begin
with a lesson on PDF, the Planet Distance Formula.
The key to any type of PROOF for this solar model is watching to see at what orbits the
next planets discovered in our solar system are found to have.
23
My formula predicts three unknown planets at
62.012 (10^8 Miles)
76.800 AU
93.018 (10^8 Miles)
Shalom,
July 11th 2002
Edited October 8th 2002
24
Footnotes
Titius-Bodes Law - Simple Planetary Distance Rule know for a couple of inaccuracies. It is
a simple doubling law with a starting point that creates orbital distances to AU by doubling
and adding four to a number and then dividing by 10.
1 3 7 - Known in Physics as the "fine-structure constant" of quantum electrodynamics. In
Kabbalah 137 is the number of Kabbalah and also the wheel of one.
CREATOR FORMULA - Theorized by me in 1995. It states the circumference ratios of
earth or aligned to the orbital rations of planets in our solar system.
PROOF for CREATOR Formula - Theorized in July 2002 by me, it is a simple PROOF
showing how the ratios of four inner planets are perfectly aligned to ratios of earth’s
circumference.
Titius-Bodes Variance - A formula I created a few days ago to align Titius-Bodes to actual
distances to the sun in 10^8 miles instead of AU.
Discovery of Quaoar - The recent discovery of this object has led me to believe that Pluto
and it are nothing but moons of a planet that once orbited at 38.40 AU. In time Pluto will
no longer be considered a planet. Pluto and Quaoar are left behind moons of Theth. My
Theth Theory fully explains Pluto, Quaoar and the Kuiper Belt.
25
THE CREATOR FORMULA!
Copyright 1995 and 2002 by Sollog
Editors Note:
Slight changes have been made reflecting more accurate measurements by NASA.
The Ratios between Mercury, Earth and Mars is new to this edition.
AN AMAZING CONNECTION BETWEEN THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE

PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE EARTHS
MEASUREMENTS, AND THE ANICENT MYTHS IN EVERY RELIGION, IS THE
SIMPLE MATHEMATICAL FORMULA BASED ON GEOMETRY, THAT
CONNECTS THE LAWS OF PHYSICS TO HISTORY AND THEOLOGY!
IT IS WHAT EINSTELN CALLED THE GRAND UNIFICATIQN THEORY (GUT).

THIS IS THE HOLY GRAIL OF THE WORLD OF PHYSICS, OR MISSING LINK
THAT CONNECTS THE LAWS OF THE PHYSICAL WORLD, TO THE WORLD
OF PHILOSOPHY, HISTORY AND THEOLOGY WHICH EINSTEIN SEARCHED
HIS ENTIRE LIFE FOR IN VAIN!
IT’S ACTUALLY A VERY SIMPLE FORMULA BASED UPON ANCIENT

PYTHAGOREAN OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES. IT INVOLVES THE USE OF
THE DIMENSIONS OF A CUBE AND THE NUMBER OF ROTATIONS THAT THE
EARTH MAKES IN 100 YEARS.
IT’S VERY INTERESTING TO NOTE, THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN RELIGIOUS

BELIEFS STATED THE EARTHS MEASUREMENT WAS BASED UPON THE
CUBE! THE VERY GEOMETRIC FORM I USE IN THIS FORMULA!
IS THIS A LOST PYTHAGOREAN FORMULA? AFTER ALL, A GREEK

MATHEMATICIAN DID MEASURE THE EARTH 1000’S OF YEARS AGO!
THE ORBITS THE EARTH MAKES IN 100 YEARS, FORMS THIS SIMPLE LAW,
WHICH MEASURES THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH MORE
ACCURATELY THAN EVEN NASA CAN DO USING SUPER COMPUTERS AND
SATELITES!
THE KNOWN AVERAGE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH IS 24,881 MILES.

THAT'S A FACT, BASED ON THE POLAR MEASUREMENT OF 24,860 AND THE
EQUATORIAL MEASUREMENT OF 24,902. THE AVERAGE OF THOSE TWO
NUMBERS IS 24,881.
NOW, THE CUBE IS MATHEMATI CALLY OBSERVED IN EUCLID THEORY, AS

HAVING 6 SIDES, 8 CORNERS AND 12 LINES OF DIMENSION.
26
THAT'S EXPRESSED MATHEMATICALLY AS 6812.
THAT’S ALSO A FACT. AS IS THE KNOWN MEASUREMENTS GIVEN ABOVE

FOR THE POLAR AND EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCES OF THE EARTH.
THE AMOUT OF DAYS IN A HUNDRED YEARS IS 36,525 DAYS (PLUS OR

MINUS .25 DAYS). THAT’S ALSO A WELL KNOWN FACT.
36,525 IS ALSO THE AMOUNT OF ROTATIONS THAT THE EARTH MAKES IN

100 ROTATIONS AROUND THE SUN, IF YOU DON’T WANT TO USE THE TERM
YEARS.
THIS IS THE SIMPLE FORML.A FOR THE EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE!
MULTIPLY 36,525
(ROTATIONS IN 100 ORBITS OF THE EARTH AROUND ITS SUN)
BY THE ECULID DIMENSIONS OF A CUBE WHICH IS 6812
36525
X .6812
THE ANSWER IS EXACTLY
24,881
THE AVERAGE KNOWN CIRCUMFERENCE I ALREADY STATED ABOVE!
THESE NUMBERS 24,881 AND THE ROTATIONS THAT THE EARTH MAKES IN
100 ORBITS (36,525) ARE THE MAIN NUMBERS, THAT EVERY KNOWN
PLANETS CIRCUMFERENCE AND ORBIT IS ALSO BASED UPON!
SO, THE CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT FOR THE EARTH IS

EXPRESSED AS ROTATIONS IN 100 ORBITS OF THE PLANET MULTIPLIED
BY THE EUCLID DIMENSIONS OF A CUBE AS A SIMPLE FRACTION!
IS THIS JUST SOME FLUKE? BASED UPON OUR MEASURING UNIT OF THE
MILE?
ONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE MYTHOS OF ANCIENT CIVILATIONS AND

THEOLOGIES, IN ORDER TO SEE THAT THIS VERY FORMULA IS GIVEN IN
THE MYTHOS OF EVERY MAJOR CIVILIZATION AND RELIGION FROM
27
ANCIENT EGYPT, GREECE AND ROME, TO THE THEOLOGIES OF JUDAISM,
CHRISTIANITY, BUDDHISM AND MUSLIMISM!
YES, ALL THESE CULTURES AND RELIGIONS HAVE THE BASICS OF THIS
FORMULA WITHIN THEIR CREATION MYTHS! IT PROVES BEYOND DOUBT
THAT THE ORIGIN OF THE CREATION MYTHS ALL CAME FROM THE SAME
SOURCE, THAT ACTUALLY USED THIS FORMULA TO CREATE NOT ONLY
THE EARTH, BUT THEN EVERY PLANET IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM ALL USING
THE EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE RATION AND ORBIT ROTATIONS!
THE FORMULA FOR THE PLANETS AND THEIR ORBITS, IS ACTUALLY

CALLED C.R.E.A.T.O.R. SINCE, IT IS A PERFECT ACCRONYM FOR
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO EARTH ALIGNED TO ORBIT RATIOS
THE MILE IS CONNECTED TO ANCIENT MYTHS IN GREECE, WHICH SAYS

THE GREEK FOOT WAS THE BASIS OF MEASUREMENT USED BY THE
CREATOR TO MAKE NOT ONLY EARTH BUT ALSO THE HEAVENS. THE
GREEK FOOT IS THE ROYAL UNIT THAT IS THE BASIS OF MEASURMENT IN
THE ROMAN MILE, WHICH IS WHAT OUR MODERN MILE IS BASED UPON.
UNLIKE THE MAN MADE MEASURING UNIT KNOWN AS THE METRIC

SYSTEM, THE CURRENT MILE IS DIRECTLY DESCENDED FROM THE GREEK
FOOT THAT IN THE MYTHOS OF GREECE, WAS SAID TO BE DIRECT FROM
THE GODS!
THE MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS IN THE FORMULA CAN ALL BE DIRECTLY

TIED TO THE ANCIENT CREATION MYTHOS OF EGYPT, GREECE, ROME,
JUDAISM, CHRISITIANTY, MUSLIMISM, BUDDHISM AND HINDUISM.
100 YEARS AND THE CUBE BOTH APPEAR IN THE MAIN STORIES OF ALL
THOSE THEOLOGIES AND MYTHOS OF SAID CIVILIATIONS!
THIS SIMPLE FORMULA, PROVES THAT THE INTELLIGENCE THAT

DESIGNED THE EARTH'S CIRCUMFERENCE AS THE MATHEMATICAL
CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE, ALSO DESIGNED ALL THE MYTHS AND
THEOLOGIES MENTIONED ABOVE, TO ONE DAY UNITE ALL THESE PATHS
TO THIS ABSOLUTE TRUTH!
HOW CAN I MAKE SUCH A CLAIM?
28
FIRST, THE 100 ORBITS AND CUBE FORMULA DOESN’T APPLY TO ANY
PLANET OTHER THAN THE EARTH. 100 YEARS AND THE CUBE IS TOTALLY
UNIQUE TO THE PERFECT CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH.
AND, THE NUMBERS THAT FORMULA GENERATE, MAGICALLY APPEAR IN

THE EXACT CIRCUMFERENCE AND ORBIT MEASUREMENTS OF ALL THE
KNOWN PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM!
IT BASICALLY PROVES BEYOND A DOUBT, NOT ONLY INTELLIGENT DESIGN

OF THE EARTH BASED UPON THE NUMBER 100 AND THE DIMENSIONS OF A
CUBE, BUT IT PROVES THE EARTHS MEASUREMENTS AND ORBITS WAS
THEN INTENTIONALLY USED AS THE BASIS OF MEASUREMENTS OF ALL
BODIES IN THE HEAVENS, EXACTLY AS IT IS STATED IN GENESIS, WHICH IS
THE ROOT OF JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND MUSLIMISM!
SCIENTISTS POINT OUT WHAT THEY PERCEIVED TO BE AN ERROR IN

GENESIS, BY SAYING, “LOOK GOD SAID HE CREATED THE EARTH AND
THEN THE HEAVENS!”
THIS FORMULA PROVES GOD DID IT EXACTLY THAT WAY.
THE EARTH’S CIRCUMFERENCE WAS DECIDED UPON BY GOD, AS BEING

AN EXACT FRACTION OF THE CUBE AND 100 ORBITS, WHICH PROVES
BEYOND DOUBT INTENTIONAL DESIGN OF THE EARTHS MEASUREMENTS.
THEN, ONCE GOD HAD IN HIS MIND THE PERFECT FORMULA FOR EARTH,
HE USED THE EXACT NUMBERS OF THE EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE AND
ORBITS IN THE DESIGN OF EVERY BODY IN THE HEAVENS!
AND THEN, EVEN MORE AMAZING, IS THAT THE ICONOGRAPHY OF 100

YEARS AND THE CUBE WAS PLACED BY GOD THE CREATOR OF THE
EARTH AND HEAVENS, INTO THE CREATION MYTHOS OF EVERY MAJOR
CIVILIZATION AND RELIGION!
IT IS TRULY THE GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY, WHICH EINSTEIN

SEARCHED FOR HIS ENTIRE LIFE. TO UNDERSTAND HOW PERFECT THESE
FORMULAS ARE YOU WOULD HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE MATHEMATICS
OF PROBABILITY. THE ODDS THAT THESE FACTS WOULD ALL LINE UP SO
PERFECTLY, IS SUCH AN ASTRONOMICAL NUMBER, THAT IT LITERALLY
DEFIES EXPLAINATION!
TO SHOW HOW PERFECT THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE

OF THE EARTH AND ITS ROTATIONS ARE, HERE ARE SOME QUICK FACTS.
29
THE ORBIT OF THE FURTHEST KNOWN PLANET, PLUTO, JUST HAPPENS TO
BE A PERFECT 1% OF THE MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTHS
CIRCUMFERENCE!
THAT IS EXACTLY 248.8 YEARS OR 1% X 24,881
THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF MERCURY TO EARTH IS THE SAME RATIO AS ITS

DISTANCE TO THE EARTH RELATIVE TO THE SUN
DISTANCE MERCURY TO EARTH TO SUN = .38

NASA 2002 FACT SHEET
MERCURY DISTANCE 36 (10^6 MILES)
EARTH DISTANCE 93 (10^6 MILES)
RATIO OF DISTANCE IS 36/93 =.38
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO MERCURY TO EARTH = .38

(IS THE SAME AS THE DISTANCE RATIO OF .38)
CIRCUMFERENCE MERCURY 9525
CIRCUMFERENCE EARTH 24881
RATIO 9525/24881 = .38
THIS RATIO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DISTANCE OF A PLANET AND

THE SUN TO EARTH AND ITS CIRCUMFERNCE MEASUREMENTS IS NOT
UNIQUE TO MERCUY/EARTH. THE EXACT SAME FORMULA CREATES THE
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO BETWEEN EARTH AND SATURN.
DISTANCE OF SATURN TO EARTH TO SUN = .10

NASA 2002 FACT SHEET
EARTH DISTANCE 93 (10^6)
SATURN DISTANCE 890.8 (10^6)
RATIO OF DISTANCE IS 93/890.8 = .10
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO EARTH TO SATURN = .10

(IS THE SAME AS THE DISTANCE RATIO OF .10)
CIRCUMFERENCE SATURN 235,296
RATIO 24881/235,296 = .10
AS ANYONE CAN SEE IN THE ABOVE TWO RATIOS, THERE IS NOW CLEAR
SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT BOTH SATURN AND MERCURY WERE DESIGNED
TO HAVE THEIR CIRCUMFENCE RATIOS TO EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE
30
MATCH THE SAME RATIO AS THE DISTANCE THESE PLANETS ARE TO THE
SUN RELATIVE TO THE EARTHS DISTANCE TO THE SUN.
THIS IS THE SIMPLE RATIO FORMULA THAT PROVES THIS OCCURRED!
RATIO DISTANCE EARTH TO SUN AND PLANET (MERCURY OR SATURN) TO

SUN EQUALS RATIO OF CIRCUMFERENCE EARTH TO PLANET
IN THE CASE OF MERCURY/EARTH THAT RATIO IS .38
IN THE CASE OF EARTH/SATURN THAT RATIO IS .10
TO SUMMARIZE, THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF SATURN AND MERCURY ARE

BOTH RELATIVE TO THE RATIO OF THE DISTANCE OF THESE PLANETS
AND EARTH TO THE SUN. THE ODDS OF BOTH OF THESE PLANETS HAVING
THIS SAME DESIGNED RATIO RELATIONSHIP IS ASTRONOMICAL.
THIS IS NOT THE ONLY SUCH RATIO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE

EARTHS ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER PLANETS.
BOTH MARS AND JUPITER ALSO HAVE A SIMPLE RATIO FORMULA

CONNECTING BOTH OF THEIR CIRCUMFERENCES TO THE EARTH.
INSTEAD OF USING ORBITAL DISTANCE TO THE SUN, WE USE THE
ORBITAL LENGTH OF TIME TO ONCE AGAIN SEE A RATIO THAT WAS
DESIGNED INTO THE MEASUREMENTS OF THESE PLANETS TO EARTH.
THE CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO OF EARTH TO MARS IS THE SAME RATIO AS

THE ORBITAL RATIO OF EARTH TO MARS. THIS FACT REPEATS ITSELF IN
THE RATIOS OF EARTH TO JUPITER!
MARS ORBIT 687 DAYS

EARTH ORBIT 365.25 DAYS
RATIO OF ORBITS EARTH/MARS = .53
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO MARS/EARTH = .53

(ISTHE SAME AS ORBIT RATIO)
CIRCUMFERENCE MARS 13264
RATIO 13264/24881 = .53
THIS SAME FORMULA APPLIES TO THE CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO BETWEEN

EARTH AND JUPITER.
31
EARTH ORBIT 365.25 DAYS
JUPITER ORBIT 4331 DAYS
RATIO OF ORBITS EARTH/JUPITER .08
CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO EARTH/JUPITER = .08

(IS THE SAME AS ORBIT RATIO)
CIRCUMFERENCE JUPITER 279,118
RATIO 24881/279,118 = .08
AS ANYONE CAN SEE IN THE ABOVE TWO RATIOS, THERE IS NOW CLEAR
SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT BOTH JUPITER AND MARS WERE DESIGNED TO
HAVE THEIR CIRCUMFENCE RATIOS TO EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE MATCH
THE SAME RATIO AS THE ORBITS OF THESE PLANETS AROUND THE SUN
RELATIVE TO THE EARTHS ORBIT OF THE SUN.
THERE IS NOW SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED PROOF THAT AT LEAST FOUR

OF THE FIVE EYE VISIABLE PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM ARE
CLEARLY CONNECTED TO A RATIO RELATIONSHIP TO THE EARTHS
CIRCUMFERENCE AND THE EARTHS ORBIT/DISTANCE TO THE SUN!
WHILE THE ODDS OF ANY OF THESE RELATIONSHIPS EXISTING MIGHT

ONLY BE ABOUT 100 TO 1 THAT SUCH A RATIO TO THE SECOND DECIMAL
POINT WOULD JUST HAPPEN TO OCCUR BETWEEN THE EARTH AND SAY
ANYONE ONE OF THE FIVE EYE VISABLE PLANETS, THE FACT THAT SUCH
A RATIO EXISTS IN AT LEAST FOUR OF THE FIVE EYE VISABLE PLANETS IS
ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT THESE PLANETS WERE CLEARLY
DESIGNED UPON MEASUREMENTS UNIQUE TO THE EARTHS
CIRCUMFERENCE AND ORBIT.
THE MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY THAT SUCH A RATIO COULD JUST

OCCUR IS EXPRESSED MATHEMATICALLY AS 100^4 / 2 OR ABOUT 50
MILLION TO 1.
THERE ARE ALSO TWO CONSTANTS IN THESE NUMBERS IF WE ANALYZE

THE RATIOS TO THE THIRD DECIMEL POINT. THE DIFFENENCES BETWEEN
THE RATIOS WILL EITHER BE .001 OR .005. TWO OF THE RATIOS ARE .001
IN DIFFENCE AND TWO ARE .005 IN DIFFERENCE.
AS YOU CAN EASILY SEE ABOVE, THE CIRCUMFERENCES OF MERCURY,

MARS, JUPITER AND SATURN ALL FOLLOW A SIMPLE RATIO RELATIONSHIP
EARTH BASED ON EITHER THEIR DISTANCE TO THE SUN RATIO OR THEIR
ORBITAL RATION RATIO.
32
THIS IS ABSOLUTE PROOF OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN TO THE
CIRCUMFERENCES OF MERCURY, MARS, JUPITER AND SATURN IN
RELATIONSHIP TO UNIQUE MEASUREMENTS OF THE EARTH! IN A
UNIVERSE OF CHAOS THESE MEASURMENTS WOULD NOT HAVE ALIGNED
PERFECTLY TO EARTHS ORBITS!
ANOTHER AMAZING FACT IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM, IS THAT URANUS IS

400% OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH MINUS A SIMPLE 1% OF
THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH. THIS FACT SHOWS ONCE AGAIN
THE INFLUENCE OF THE EARTHS MEASUREMENTS TO THE DESIGN OF
THE PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM.
LATER ON I WILL SHOW THE EXACT FORMULA FOR EACH PLANET USING
ONLY SIMPLE FRACTIONS OF THE EARTHS MEASUREMENTS AND THE
ROTATIONS OF 100 ORBITS AND THE EUCLID EXPRESSION FOR A CUBE!
FIRST, I WILL DISCUSS THE CREATION MYTHOS OF ALL THE CIVILIZATIONS

AND THEOLOGIES THAT THIS FORMULA DIRECTLY CONNECTS TO.
THE CUBE IS CONSIDERED THE KEY TO CREATION IN JUST ABOUT EVERY

CULTURE AND RELIGION! IT IS THE FIRST PICTOGRAPH IN EGYPT, AS A
SYMBOL FOR CREATION. THE GREEKS WORSHIPED THE CUBE OF
CREATION, AS IT IS CLEARLY DESCRIBED IN PYTHAGOREAN MYTHOS.
THE VERY SAME MATHEMATICIANS FROM WHICH WE BASE MANY OF OUR

LAWS OF MATH UPON! THE PYTHAGOREANS WERE EVEN KNOWN TO
WORSHIP THE CUBE, AND THEIR MYTHOS USED IT TO REPRESENT THE
EARTH!
THE CUBE IN ANCIENT HEBREW IS REFEREED TO AS THE HOLIEST OF

HOLIES, THE STAR QF DAVID IS EVEN BASED ON THE SIX SIDES OF A
CUBE, HENCE THE SIX POINTS OF THE STAR OF DAVID!
THE BUDDHISTS WORSHIPPED THE GOLDEN CUBE OF CREATION! TO THIS

DAY, THE BLACK CUBE OF MECCA IS THE MOST SACRED ITEM OF ISLAM!
SOCIOLOGISTS ARE AMAZED THAT THIS COMPLEX GEOMETRIC

FORM IS SO UNIVERSALLY REFERRED TO BY ALMOST EVERY CIVILIZATION
AS THE CUBE OF CREATION! WELL, NOW YOU KNOW WHY!
THE INTELLIGENCE THAT DESIGNED THE EARTH ALSO PUT THIS ITEM IN
ALL THE CREATION MYTHOS OF MOST CIVILIZATIONS IN ORDER TO UNITE
33
THEM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME! THE CREATOR ALSO CREATED EVERY
MAJOR RELIGION, SINCE THE 100 YEAR AND CUBE APPEARS IN THE
MAJOR STORIES OF ALL RELIGIONS AS WELL!
MOST CIVILIZATIONS, SUCH AS EGYPT AND GREECE, ALSO HAD CREATOR

GODS THAT DIRECTLY MAKE REFERENCE TO THE NUMBER 36,525, OR THE
ROTATIONS OF EARTH IN 100 ORBITS!
THE EXACT PERIOD OF 100 YEARS IN TIME APPEARS DIRECTLY IN THE

OLDEST RELIGION STILL PRACTICED TODAY ON EARTH! THAT IS
HINDUISM. THE MUCH IGNORED CREATOR GOD OF HINDUISM, IS
BRAHMA; HIS LIFE CYCLES ARE EXACTLY 100 YEARS. HIS AGE IS ALSO
SAID TO BE THE MAIN MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH AND THE HEAVENS.
HOWEVER, A BRAHMA YEAR IS QUITE VAST TO A HUMAN YEAR!
TO THIS DAY, HINDUS HAVE THE DOT OR DECIMAL POINT IN THE FORMULA
OF CREATION ON THEIR HEADS. IN OTHER CULTURES THE BLACK RISING
SUN IS SAID TO BE THE BEGINNING OF ALL LIFE.
THIS UNIVERSAL FIGURE, THE BLACK SUN, IS THE DECIMAL POINT IN THE
FORMULA. THE RISING BLACK SUN THAT JIMMY MORRISON ACTUALLY
SANG ABOUT IS THE SAME RISING BLACK SUN THAT IS THE FIRST SYMBOL
IN ALL CULTURES FOR CREATION, OR THE COSMIC EGG!
THE UNIVERSAL USE OF THE BLACK SUN, OR DECIMAL POINT, AGAIN

BAFFLES SOCIOLOGISTS, SINCE VIRTUALLY EVERY ANCIENT CIVILIZATION
THAT STARTS OUT AS SUN WORSHIPERS, ALWAYS CHOOSES THE BLACK
SUN AS THE SYMBOL OF THE BEGINNING OF CREATION.
SOCIOLOGISTS USUALLY THEORIZE, THAT THE SIMPLE SIGN OF A CIRCLE

THAT ISN’T FILLED IN, OR THE SYMBOL USED TO REPRESENT THE SUN,
SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE ORIGINAL SIGNS USED BY PRIMATIVE MEN, BUT
INSTEAD, THEY ALL ALMOST UNIVERSALLY CHOSE TO USE THE FILLED IN
BLACK CIRCLE OR BLACK SUN, AS THE SYMBOL OF THEIR BEGINNING!
THE VERY FIRST PICTOGRAPH FOR CREATION IN EGYPT AFTER THE

BLACK SUN WAS THE CUBE! ONE OF THE CREATOR GODS IN EGYPT, IS
KNOWN AS THOTH, HE WAS ALSO KNOWN AS THE MEASURERER OF THE
EARTH!
IT IS SAID IN EGYPTIAN MYTHOS, THAT HIS KNOWLEDGE OF CELESTIAL

MEASURING IS BASED UPON HIS SECRET KNOWLEDGE CONTAINED
WITHIN THE BOOKS OF THOTH, WHICH JUST HAPPEN TO NUMBER AS
34
36,525 BOOKS OF CELESTIAL WISDOM. (THAT’S THE KEY NUMBER AGAIN
IN THE FORMULA!) THE EQUIVALENT CREATOR GOD IN GREECE IS KNOWN
AS HERMES. HE IS ALSO KNOWN AS THE MEASURER OF EARTH, AND
AGAIN HE BUILT THE EARTH AND HEAVENS WITH HIS 36,525 BOOKS OF
KNOWLEDGE!
BUDDHA IS CREDITED WITH 80,000 WORKS OF WISDOM. IN ANCIENT

SANSKRIT, THAT NUMBER JUST MEANS A GREAT MANY! IT IS NOT A
LITERAL NUMBER, BUT AGAIN THE IDEA OF A GOD WHO USED HIS BOOKS
TO MEASURE THE HEAVENS IS PRESENT, AND MOST LIKELY THE NUMBER
WAS 36,525 IN THE ORIGIN OF THAT MYTH, BUT OVER THE YEARS, IT WAS
LOST TO JUST THE PHRASE FOR A GREAT MANY!
THE JEWS HAVE ABRAHAM, WHO FATHERED ISSAC THE FATHER OF

ISRAEL! IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT ABRAHAM DID THE MAGIC SEEDING
OF ISAAC WITH SARAH AT YOU GUESSED IT 100 YEARS. SO ANOTHER
CREATION MYTHOS IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO 100 YEARS!
ISLAMS MOST HOLY OBJECT IS THE BLACK CUBE OF MECCA. THE

FOUNDER OF ISLAM WAS MOHAMMAD, WHO CONSIDERED HIS FATHER TO
BE THE ABRAHAM OF THE JEWS! SO THE 100YEAR CONNECTION APPEARS
IN ISLAM THROUGH THE CONNECTION OF ABRAHAM TO MOHAMMAD!
ALTHOUGH CHRISTIANS HAVE NO CURRENT BIBLICAL CONNECTIONS TO

THE FORMULA, SINCE MANY OF THE EARLY CHRISTIAN MYTHOS WAS
DISCARDED BY EARLY CHURCH FATHERS IN ROME, THERE IS ENOUGH
SYMBOLISM TO QUALIFY THEIR BELIEFS TO THAT OF GREECE AND EGYPT.
THE FISH WAS THEIR FIRST PICIOGRAPH. THE FISH REPRESENTED

PISCES. JESUS’ BIRTH SIGNIFIED A CHANGE IN ZODIAC SIGNS FROM THE
RAM TO PISCES. THAT’S THE FISH. IT WAS LATER CHANGED TO THE
CROSS OF THE GREEK GOD HERMES CENTURIES LATER. YES THE SIGN
OF HERMES, WHO APPEARED OVER 1000 YEARS BEFORE JESUS, WAS
THE CROSS.
THERE IS HISTORICAL EVIDENCE THAT IN ALL LIKELY HOOD JESUS WAS

CRUCIFIED ON A TREE, IF HE EXISTED AT ALL. SINCE CROSSES WERE
USED LATER BY THE ROMANS TO CRUCIFY CRIMINALS!
HERMES WAS ALSO KNOWN AS THE GOOD SHEPHERD, ANOTHER SYMBOL

TAKEN BY JESUS. HERMES WAS SAID TO BE BORN TO A VIRGIN MOTHER
NAMED MAIA, THE GREEK EQUIVALENT OF MARY.
35
HOWEVER, ST. THOMAS AQUINAS DOES GIVE REFERENCE TO JESUS
HAVING VOLUMES OF HEAVENLY BOOKS, SO WITH SOME CREATIVE
THINKING FOUNDED IN THE UNITY OF LOVE I’LL INCLUDE CHRISTIANS
INTO THE GROUP OF CULTURES OR THEOLOGIES WITH ENOUGH OF THE
SYMBOLS ATTACHED TO OTHERS THAT HAVE THEM STATED MUCH MORE
CLEARLY! SINCE I WOULD HATE TO LEAVE OUT 1 BILLON PEOPLE!
MY FAVORITE LINE IN REFERENCE TO HISTORY IS "IF YOU DON'T LEARN

THE LESSONS, YOU’LL REPEAT IT!"
WELL, HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY VALIDATE THE C.R.E.A.T.O.R. FORMULA,

SINCE MOST EVERY CIVILIZATION AND THEOLOGY HAD IN ITS CREATION
MYTHOS STORIES CONNECTED TO THE BLACK RISING SUN (THE DECIMAL
POINT), THE ACT OF CUBE WORSHIP (6812), AND 36,525 DAYS OR 100
YEARS, AS NUMBERS IN THEIR MYTHOS, AND THESE NUMBERS ARE THE
BASIS OF THE FORMULA.
WHAT A HAPP Y ENDING, EVERYONE GETS TO BE RIGHT ABOUT GOD! THIS

IS THE FINAL GREAT MYSTERY. IT HAS FINALLY BEEN REVEALED. SEVEN
CIVILIZATIONS AND RELIGIONS HAVE BEEN UNITED! ARE THESE THE
SEVEN SEALS? THIS UNIFICATION STORY COMES WITH A MESSAGE.
LOVE IS THE ANSWER!
WE ARE ALL OF ONE GOD!
NOW IS THE TIME TO UNITE!
BY THE WAY EVERY PLANET AND ITS ORBIT IS INDEED BASED ON THE
EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT AND ITS ORBITS! THE BOOKS
OF CREATION STATE THAT THE EARTH CAME FIRST, AND THEN THE
HEAVENS WERE BUILT AROUND THE EARTH! IF YOU DIG IN DIRT TO FIND
THE ANSWER TO WHOM YOU ARE, YOU SHALL FIND A DIRTY ANSWER!
IF YOU LOOK TO THE HEAVENS FOR THE ANSWER, YOU 'LL REMOVE
YOURSELF FURTHER FROM IT! WE ARE AT THE MATHEMATICAL CENTER
OF THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO THIS NEW FORMULA.
AND WE ARE ALL ONE! FOR GOD IS WITHIN US ALL. SO LOVE EVERYONE
AND EYERYTHING! AND REMEMBER TO LOVE YOURSELF AS YOU DO THE
CREATOR. FOR THE CREATOR IS WITHIN ALL. AND ALL IS WITHIN THE
LOVE OF THE CREATOR.
36
THE NEW AGE OF LOVE HAS BEGUN, GET ON BOARD. OR YOU WILL
REPEAT THE LESSON IN ANOTHER DIMENSION. FOR THE TRUTH IS HERE!
THE LAW OF ONE CREATOR HAS INDEED BEEN PROVEN. WHAT EVER
YOUR RELIGION WAS YOU WERE RIGHT. SO STOP THE WARS. WE ARE ALL
BROTHERS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RACE. THERE ARE NO CLASSES.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A NATION. THERE CAN NOW BE NO DIVSION
OF RELIGIONS. THERE IS ONLY THE LAW OF ONE.
37
THE C.R.E.A.T.O.R. FORMULA
Circumference Ratio Earth Aligned To Orbit Ratios

Copyright 1995 to 2002 Sollog
THE FOLLOWING FIGURES SHOW HOW EASY IT IS TO CREATE NEAR

PERFECT CIRCUMFERENCES OF THE PLANETS IN THIS SOLAR SYSTEM
BASED UPON THE UNIQUE NUMBERS OF THE EARTH AND THE CUBE. THE
KEY NUMBERS ARE THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH 24,881 AND THE
ORBITS EARTH MAKES IN 100 YEARS (36525). A CUBE IS EXPRESSED AS
6812.
EARTH
100 YR X CUBE
36525 X .6821 = 24881 (NASA'S VALUE 24881 100%)
MERCURY
EARTH CIRC. X 40% - EARTH YR - CUBE
24881 X .40 - 365.25 – 68.12 = 9519.03 (NASA'S VALUE 99.93%)
MERCURY’S CIRCUMFERENCE IS ALSO THE SAME RATIO AS ITS DISTANCE

RATIO TO THE SUN AND TO EARTH IS. BOTH ARE .38%
MERCURY DISTANCE TO SUN 36 (10^6 MILES)

EARTH DISTANCE TO SUN 93 (10^6 MILES)
RATIO 36/93 = .38
EARTH CIRC. X .38 = MERCURY CIRC.
SATURN
EARTH CIRCUM. X 10 – (CUBE x 2)
24881 X 10 – (6812 X 2) = 235186 (99.95% NASA)
SATURNS CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IS LIKE MERCURY BASED UPON ITS

DISTANCE RATIO TO THE SUN AND TO EARTH. BOTH ARE .10
EARTH DISTANCE TO SUN 93 (10^6)

SATURN DISTANCE TO SUN 890.8 (10 ^6)
RATIO 93/890.8 = .10
SATURN CIRC. X .10 = EARTH CIR.
MARS
EARTH YR / MARS YR X EARTH CIRC.
365.25 / 687 X 24,881 = 13,228.22 (99.85% NASA'S VALUE)
38
MARS’ CIRCUMFERENCE IS ALSO THE SAME RATIO AS ITS ORBIT RATIO IS TO
EARTH BOTH ARE .53
MARS YEAR 687 DAYS

EARTH YEAR 365.25 DAYS
RATIO 365.25/687 = .53%
EARTH CIRC. X .53 = MARS CIRC.
JUPITER
100 YEARS ORBITS EARTH – EARTH X 24 (HOURS) – EARTH YEAR
36525 – 24881 X 24 – 365.25 = 279090.75 = 99.99% NASA'S VALUE
JUPITERS CIRCUMFERNCE RATIO IS LIKE MARS BASED UPON ITS ORBIT RATIO
TO EARTH. BOTH ARE .08
JUPITER YEAR 4331 DAYS

RATIO 365.25/4331 = .08
JUPITER CIRC. X .08 = EARTH CIRC.
URANUS
EARTH CIRC. X 4 + 1% EARTH
24881 X 4 + 248.81 = 99772.81 (NASA'S VALUE 99.99%)
NEPTUNE
EARTH CIRC. X 4 - 10% EARTH. - EARTH YR
24,881 X 4 - 2,488.1 - 365.25 = 96670.65 (NASA'S VALUE 99.99%)
VENUS
EARTH CIRC. – EARTH YR – VENUS YR – CUBE
24881 – 365.25 – 224.7 – 681.2 = 23609.85 (99.92% NASA)
PLUTO
10% PLUTO YR X EARTH YR / 2 + CUBE + CUBE
24.8 X 365.25 / 2 + 68.12 + 68.12 = 4,665.34 (100% NASA'S VALUE)
MEASUREMENTS OF PLANETS CIRCUMFERENCES BASED UPON NASA

FACT SHEET LOCATED AT
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/planet_table_british.html
39
THE PROOF THAT EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE WAS DESIGNED BY AN INTELLIGENT CREATOR; AND THE EARTHS
CIRCUMFERECENCE AND ORBIT ROTATIONS WERE USED TO CREATE ALL THE PLANETS.
COPYRIGHT 1995 AND 2002 SOLLOG
THE PROOF WE ARE ALL ONE!

IN THE END, THE TRUTH ALWAYS COMES OUT!
THE LAW OF ONE! WE ARE ALL ONE!
THE EARTH'S CIRCUMFERENCE FORMULA WAS BASED ON 3

SYMBOLS OF CREATION IN EVERY CIVILIZATION AND RELIGION.
36,525 X .6812 = 24,881. THAT IS THE PERFECT CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE
EARTH. 36,525 IS THE AMOUNT OF DAYS IN A HUNDRED YEARS OR
ROTATIONS THAT THE EARTH MAKES IN 100 YEARS! THE NUMBER 6812 IS
THE DIMENSIONS OF A CUBE! 6 SIDES 8 CORNERS AND 12 LINES OF
DIRECTION! THE CUBE IS AN ANCIENT SYMBOL OF EVERY RELIGION FOR
CREATION! ALL RELIGIONS HAVE CREATOR GODS WHO LIVED 100 YEARS
OR HAD KNOWLEDGE OF 36,525 BOOKS OF GOD'S WISDOM! THE DECIMAL
POINT IS THE RISING BLACK SUN OR PRIMORDIAL EGG THAT EVERY
CIVILIZATION USED AS A PICTOGRAPH TO REPRESENT THE BEGINNING OF
TIME!
THE GROUPING OF TIME INTO A LOGICAL UNIT PROVES

INTELLIGENCE. TIME IS IRRELEVANT TO NATURE. THE CUBE IS A
GEOMETRIC SHAPE OF INTELLIGENT THOUGHT! IT DOES NOT OCCUR IN
NATURE. THE CUBE IN ANCIENT HEBREW WAS THE HOLIEST OF HOLIES IN
SYMBOLISM! ASK A RABBI. TO THIS DAY THE MUSLIMS WORSHIP THE
BLACK CUBE OF MECCA. THE BUDDHISTS WORSHIP THE GOLDEN CUBE
OF THE GOLDEN RULE, LOVE. THE GREEKS KNOWN AS THE
PYTHAGOREANS, WHO GAVE US OUR MATH AND MEASUREMENT OF A
FOOT, WERE CUBE WORSHIPERS. THE FIRST PICTOGRAPH IN EGYPT FOR
CREATION IS THE CUBE!
ABRAHAM WAS 100 YEARS OLD, (36,525 DAYS) WHEN HE FATHERED

ISSAC THE FATHER OF ISRAEL! THE GREEK GOD HERMES, AND THE
EGYPTIAN GOD THOTH ARE KNOWN AS THE MEASURERS OF THE EARTH.
THEY BOTH USED THE SECRET BOOKS OF GOD, KNOWN AS THE 36,525
BOOKS OF CELESTIAL WISDOM. THE BOOKS THAT HOLD THE EARTH AND
HEAVENS TOGETHER. THE HINDU CREATOR GOD WAS BRAHMA. HE LIVED
40
100 YEARS. HINDUS BELIEVE HIS AGE IS THE SECRET TO CREATION! TO
THIS DAY THE HINDUS WEAR THE DECIMAL POINT OF CREATION ON THEIR
FOREHEADS!
THIS IS NOT COINCIDENCE. THE CREATOR PUT THE SECRET

FORMULA OF CREATION INTO EVERY CIVILIZATION AND RELIGION! IT WAS
PUT THERE TO UNITE THE WORLD WHEN IT WAS TIME!
THE MOST AMAZING THING ABOUT THE EARTH'S FORMULA IS THAT

IT IS TOTALLY UNIQUE TO EARTH. YOU CAN'T CREATE THE OTHER
PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM WITH IT. AHH, YOU FOLLOWERS OF
DARWINESQUE ILLUSION ARE SALIVATING, THAT THIS FORMULA MIGHT BE
A FLUKE OF NATURE. NOT!
FOR ONCE YOU HAVE THE DIMENSIONS OF EARTH'S

CIRCUMFERENCE AND ORBIT ROTATIONS, YOU CAN CREATE ALL OF THE
CIRCUMFERENCES OF THE PLANETS IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM WITH
FOURTH GRADE MULTIPLICATION, DIVISION AND SIMPLE ADDITION AND
SUBTRACTION! THIS PROVES THAT THE VALUES OF THE ORBIT AND
CIRCUMFERENCE OF EARTH CAME FIRST. YES, THE EARTH WAS CREATED
FIRST, AND THEN THE HEAVENS WERE CREATED! SEEMS I READ THAT
BEFORE, SOMEWHERE?
THE LESSON IS WE ARE ALL ONE. LOVE IS THE ANSWER.
ANOTHER SON OF GOD, THEY HUNG ON A CROSS. WELL, HIS

MESSAGE IS TRUER TODAY THAN WHEN THE POOR LAMB WALKED THIS
SPHERE OF CREATION. YES HIS MESSAGE WAS THE TRUTH OF THE
CREATOR. LOVE THE CREATOR AS YOU LOVE YOURSELF AND ALL LIFE ON
THE PLANET!
FOR YOU SEE MY FRIENDS, SEPARATION AND DIVISION ARE NOT

THE WAY TO GO. UNITY THROUGH LOVE OF THE CREATOR IS THE ONLY
WAY TO FIND PEACE AND HAPPINESS. IMAGINE, A SUPERIOR
INTELLIGENCE LOVED US SO MUCH, THAT IT CREATED THIS AMAZING
PLANET FOR ALL OF THE CHILDREN OF THE CREATOR THAT NOW RESIDE
UPON IT. THE TRUTH OF THE CREATOR HAS BEEN REVEALED. YOU MUST
NOW MAKE THAT CHOICE. JOIN THE FORCES OF LOVE OF THE CREATOR,
OR THE FORCES OF THE OTHER SIDE WITHOUT LOVE OF THE CREATOR
LOVE IS THE ANSWER! WE ARE ALL ONE!
41
Copyright 1995 to 2002 Sollog
THE FOLLOWING FIGURES SHOW HOW EASY IT IS TO CREATE NEAR

PERFECT CIRCUMFERENCES OF THE PLANETS IN THIS SOLAR SYSTEM
BASED UPON THE UNIQUE NUMBERS OF THE EARTH AND THE CUBE. THE
KEY NUMBERS ARE THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH 24,881 AND THE
ORBITS EARTH MAKES IN 100 YEARS (36525). A CUBE IS EXPRESSED AS
6812.
EARTH
100 YR X CUBE
36525 X .6821 = 24881 (NASA'S VALUE 24881 100%)
MERCURY
EARTH CIRC. X 40% - EARTH YR - CUBE
24881 X .40 - 365.25 – 68.12 = 9519.03 (NASA'S VALUE 99.93%)
MERCURY’S CIRCUMFERENCE IS ALSO THE SAME RATIO AS ITS DISTANCE

RATIO TO THE SUN AND TO EARTH IS. BOTH ARE .38%

RATIO 36/93 = .38
SATURN
EARTH CIRCUM. X 10 – (CUBE x 2)
24881 X 10 – (6812 X 2) = 235186 (99.95% NASA)


RATIO 93/890.8 = .10
SATURN CIRC. X .10 = EARTH CIR.
MARS
EARTH YR / MARS YR X EARTH CIRC.
365.25 / 687 X 24,881 = 13,228.22 (99.85% NASA'S VALUE)
MARS’ CIRCUMFERENCE IS ALSO THE SAME RATIO AS ITS ORBIT RATIO IS TO

EARTH BOTH ARE .53
42
MARS YEAR 687 DAYS
RATIO 365.25/687 = .53%
JUPITER
100 YEARS ORBITS EARTH – EARTH X 24 (HOURS) – EARTH YEAR
36525 – 24881 X 24 – 365.25 = 279090.75 = 99.99% NASA'S VALUE

RATIO 365.25/4331 = .08
URANUS
EARTH CIRC. X 4 + 1% EARTH
24881 X 4 + 248.81 = 99772.81 (NASA'S VALUE 99.99%)
NEPTUNE
EARTH CIRC. X 4 - 10% EARTH. - EARTH YR
24,881 X 4 - 2,488.1 - 365.25 = 96670.65 (NASA'S VALUE 99.99%)
VENUS
EARTH CIRC. – EARTH YR – VENUS YR – CUBE
24881 – 365.25 – 224.7 – 681.2 = 23609.85 (99.92% NASA)
PLUTO
10% PLUTO YR X EARTH YR / 2 + CUBE + CUBE
24.8 X 365.25 / 2 + 68.12 + 68.12 = 4,665.34 (100% NASA'S VALUE)
MEASUREMENTS OF PLANETS CIRCUMFERENCES BASED UPON NASA

FACT SHEET LOCATED AT
43
The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula
CRE = ORE + V
PROOF OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN TO OUR SOLAR SYSTEM!
By Sollog
July 2nd 2002
Late yesterday I discovered a clear PROOF validating my 1995 work known

as THE CREATOR FORMULA!
Less than 24 hours later I now have the absolute PROOF that four of the five
eye visible planets in our solar system follow a simple circumference ratio
formula. This completely validates my 1995 Theory known as The CREATOR
Formula.
To summarize that theory, I stated in 1995 that it was obvious the planets
and orbits in our solar system were intelligently designed based upon the
circumference ratio of Earth's orbit ratios to the planets.
I put forth some simple examples of how the planets were aligned to key
measurements of the Earth, such as its circumference of 24,881 and its orbit
of 365.25 days in a year and 36,525 in 100 years.
Well, I now have the hard scientific PROOF that my theory is based upon
scientific FACT! The figures I used in my PROOF come from a web page
NASA maintains with key information about the Earth and other planets in
our solar system.
These figures from NASA even make some numbers in my 1995 Formula
look better than the 99.97% error margins a few had been assigned by me in
1995. Most of the figures in my original work are now within 99.99% of
accuracy.
This is all well and dandy, but the BIG NEWS is that I have now found FOUR
SCIENTIFIC EXAMPLES of how the planets in our solar system are clearly
DESIGNED to be simple ratios of the circumference of the Earth!
The planets are four of the five eye visible planets in our nightly sky. Mercury,
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn ALL HAVE CIRCUMFERENCES that I can now
44
PROVE, thanks to NASA, as being connected to two simple circumference
ratio formulas of Earth!
The FACT that two simple circumference ratio formulas CREATE THE
CIRCUMFERENCES of four of the five closest planets to Earth absolutely
validates my CREATOR FORMULA claim.
The Circumference Ratio Earth And The Orbit Ratios is THE FORMULA
used to create Mercury, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn!
Perhaps the ancient myth stating Venus was not an original planet in our
Solar System has now been proven by this formula as well.
The FACT that four out of five eye visible planets have now been found to
have circumferences clearly connected to the Earth is PROOF BEYOND
DOUBT these planets and Earth were intelligently designed. These ratios
could not have just happened in a chance random occurrence as disciples of
Chaos state!
The two formulas are both based upon the circumference of Earth and ratio
connected to its unique orbital measurements.
One formula creates a ratio using the Earths yearly orbit of 365.25 and the
other creates a ratio using the Earths distance to the sun of 93 (10^6 miles).
That’s 93 million miles or so to those not familiar with mathematical notation.
When the mathematical ratio between a planet and Earth is found based
upon either the orbit or distance to the sun of the planet and Earth, a simple
ratio is discovered. One of these ratios will then be found to create the
circumference of the planet relative to Earths own circumference of 24,881.
For instance, when we find the ratio of the distance to the sun between Earth
and Mercury we have a ratio of .38.
Mercury’s distance to the sun is 36 (10^6 miles) and the Earth is 93 (10^6
miles). These two numbers form a ratio that is the same as the circumference
ratio between both planets.
36 / 93 = .38.
The circumference of Mercury is .38 of the circumference of the Earth! So the
circumference ratio matches the orbit distance ratio!
45
If this alone were the only planet that did this, it would be a remarkable fact.
However, this EXACT FORMULA also creates the circumference of Saturn!
The distance to sun ratio between Saturn and Earth is the same as the
circumference ratio between Saturn and Earth. EXACTLY THE SAME
FORMULA that connects the Earth to Mercury also connects the Earths
measurements to Saturn!
Earths distance to the sun is 93 (10^6 miles), the distance of the sun to
Saturn is 890.8 (10^6 miles). This creates a ratio of 93/890.8 = .10
The circumference ratio between Saturn and Earth is also .10. So we have
the same ratio connection in two different planets to Earths unique
circumference and orbital measurements!
The next formula is based upon the orbit of earth and the ratio to its
circumference. This formula creates the circumference of both Mars and
Jupiter!
The orbit of Earth is 365.25 days. The orbit of Mars is 687 days. This forms a
ratio of 365.25/687 = .53. This orbit ratio is the same as the circumference
ratio between the two planets! Earths circumference is 24,881 while the
circumference of Mars is 13,264. The ratio between the two circumferences
is 13264/24881 = .53. Once again we have the circumference ratio of Earth
to another planet matching a unique number connected to the orbit of earth
and the orbit of that planet. Both the orbit and circumference ratios between
Earth and Mars are .53.
This same ratio formula can be used to prove that Earth is similarly
connected to the circumference of Jupiter in the same way! The orbit of Earth
is 365.25 days. The orbit of Jupiter is 4331 days. This forms a ratio between
the two planets of 365.25/4331 = .08. This same ratio of .08 is also the ratio
between these two planets circumferences! The circumference of Earth is
24,881. The circumference of Jupiter is 279,118. The ratio is 24,881/279,118
= .08. So this is the second planet to follow the same circumference ratio
formula that connects not only Mars to Earth but also Jupiter to Earth.
To summarize, in 1995 I stated publicly there was a clear connection
between the Circumference Ratio Earth Aligned To Orbit Ratios. This
acronym creates the word CREATOR hence the name of my formula The
CREATOR Formula. I have now found two simple ratio formulas that connect
the circumferences of four of the five eye visible stars to this theory. I have
46
proven that 80% of the eye visible planets in our solar system have
circumference ratios connected to Earth that match either the orbit ratio or
the orbit distance ratio to Earth!
The mathematical odds AGAINST such a perfect symmetry in our solar
system connecting to the base measurements of Earth are astronomical!
This ratio alignment to Earths basic measurements could not have just
happened! This is absolute PROOF that the Earth and other planets in our
solar system were DESIGNED!
I have also found that both Uranus and Neptune follow similar formulas
based upon the Earths Orbital Distance ratios to these planets. However,
there is a second step for these two distant planets. The ratio to Uranus is
found by multiplying the orbit distance by five. The same formula is used to
find the ratio to Neptune, but the multiplier is seven. If we follow these steps
using the orbital distance to the sun formula, then we can create the
circumference ratio of both Neptune and Uranus using the multipliers I have
named above! So there is a clear connection to a circumference ratio formula
to the earth and both Uranus and Neptune, if we only add one simple step to
find the exact circumference ratio factor.
It is my opinion that the measurements of both Uranus and Neptune are
slightly incorrect as stated by NASA at this time, so in the future the numbers
I have given above should align correctly with these planets.
I have not spent much time analyzing Pluto since many consider it a non-
planet.
The only planet that does not have such an obvious simple connection to the
circumference ratio formula’s of distance or orbit is Venus.
As I stated before, perhaps Venus was added to our solar system after it was
created, exactly as some ancient myths state!
The fact that 80% of the eye visible planets do in FACT share one of two
simple circumference ratio formulas is enough proof of intelligent design if
you ask me!
If you see a skeptic arguing that the formula creates ratios that are either
.001 or .005 off. This is true. However, these two differences are actually
CONSTANTS in the formula, since the difference will be either .001 or .005
off!
47
To give you an idea of how unlikely it is for two numbers to be within .001 of
each other, it is around a 500 to 1 probable occurrence. For the numbers to
be within .005 is about 100 to 1 probable.
The odds of these four numbers all having a ratio connection as described
above is over one billion to one probable.
So we can now say it is ONE BILLION TO ONE PROBABLE that the earth
and our solar system were DESIGNED!
This also PROVES GOD is now ONE BILLION TO ONE probable!
We can now say, the ratio of the circumference between Earth and Mercury
is the same as the ratio between the distance of Earth and Mercury to the
sun.
We can now say, the ratio of the circumference between Earth and Saturn is
the same as the ratio between the distance of Earth and Saturn to the sun.
We can now say, the ratio of the circumference between Earth and Mars is
the same as the ratio between the orbits of Earth and Mars.
We can now say, the ratio of the circumference between Earth and Jupiter is
the same as the ratio between the orbits of Earth and Jupiter.
The odds of this being part of a random chance occurrence as the theory of
chaos says it is, are astronomical. Over ONE BILLION TO ONE! This is
absolutely PROOF the Solar System was DESIGNED! It is PROOF OF A
CREATOR! It is PROOF OF GOD!
48
MERCURY/EARTH RATIO
MERCURY’S CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO TO THE EARTH IS THE SAME
RATIO AS ITS DISTANCE RATIO TO THE SUN AND EARTH IS. BOTH
ARE .38%
RATIO 36/93 = .38
VARIANCE = .005
49
SATURN/EARTH RATIO
SATURN’S CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IS LIKE MERCURY BASED UPON
ITS DISTANCE RATIO TO THE SUN AND TO EARTH. BOTH ARE .10
RATIO 93/890.8 = .10
SATURN CIRC. X .10 = EARTH CIRC.
VARIANCE = .001
50
MARS/EARTH RATIO
MARS’ CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IS THE SAME RATIO AS ITS ORBIT
RATIO IS TO EARTH BOTH ARE .53
MARS YEAR 687 DAYS
RATIO 365.25/687 = .53%
VARIANCE = .001
JUPITER/EARTH RATIO
JUPITER’S CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IS LIKE MARS BASED UPON ITS
ORBIT RATIO TO EARTH. BOTH ARE .08
RATIO 365.25/4331 = .08
51
VARIANCE = .005
The Creator Formula can be expressed scientifically as

CRE = ORE + V
Where C equals Circumference, R equals ratio, E equals Earth, O equals
Orbit Distance to sun or Orbit around sun, and V equals constant of .001 or
.005
If we use more accurate figures than the rounded off to one decimal place
numbers that NASA makes publicly available, the variance of .001 and .005
should round off to the .003 range.
.003 is the average between these two numbers already!
It is entirely possible that V will equal Pi/1000 or .00314
We could already say .003 or ~= Pi/1000 is the V or variance in the formula
since rounded off data produces either .001 or .005 Variance or an average
of Pi/1000!
If a repeating Variance of .003 is proven to be the case by using more
accurate data, we then have a collision of two intelligent factors in the
formula. The fact that the designer/creator/GOD who chose to base these
planets measurements not only as a ratio of Earth, but added the sum of
1/1000 of Pi to the equation, shows INTELLIGENT DESIGN to such a
degree, that it would silly to argue against intelligent design of these planets.
When NASA supplies their most accurate data, the formula may be adjusted
to
CRE = ORE + V(Pi/1000)
The addition of Pi/1000 to this formula as the V or Variance will show the
absolute PROOF of design of this solar system to the probability level of
many trillions to one.
If NASA's current data does not make V equal to Pi/1000, it is my opinion that
more accurate measurements in the future will show this as fact.
52
The reason I am sure Pi/1000 is the correct variance using accurate
measurements is that this variance is encoded into the ratio between the
mass of Earth/Jupiter.
Earth's mass is 6.58 (10^21 tons) while Jupiter is 2093 (10^21 tons) the ratio
of mass between Earth/Jupiter is 6.58/2093 or a ratio of .00314. That means
Pi/1000 is encoded into the mass ratio of Earth/Jupiter to the 6th decimal
point or a one million to 1 probable coincidence!
Likewise, other major ratios of the formula unique to Earth are encoded in the
mass ratios of Earth to the other planets that OBEY the Creator Formula.
The year of earth 365.256 is unique to earth, YET IT IS THE RATIO OF
MERCURY'S mass!
365.256/1000 is the ratio of the mass of Mercury/Earth to .001 variance. Or
about a 500 to 1 probability that such a coincidence would occur!
The mass of Mercury is rounded off by NASA to .364 (10^21 tons).
365.256/1000 = .365 or a variance to Mercury's mass of .001. That variance
means it was only 500 to 1 probable that these numbers would align with
.001 by chance!
Saturn's mass is also aligned to the Creator Formula. Saturn's CRE
(Circumference Ratio to Earth) is based upon its distance to sun ratio with
Earth.
If we take exactly 10% of that ratio of .104 we end up with .0104. The Mass
of Earth to Saturn ratio matches this perfectly!
Earth's mass is 6.58 (10^21 tons) while Saturn's is 627 (10^21 tons). This
ratio is 6.58/627 or .0104. So we can say the distance to sun ratio between
Earth and Saturn divided by 10% equals the mass ratio between Earth and
Saturn to 4 decimal point accuracy!
Again, this same ratio also matches the Circumference ratio!
The odds of two random numbers aligning by chance to 4 decimals accuracy
is about 10,000 to 1 probable!
The fourth proof that planetary mass of the Creator Formula planets are ratio
connected to unique earth measurements is that 10% of the Earth's distance
to the sun is the ratio of mass between Mars and Earth! Earth's mean
distance tot he sun is approximately 92.9186 (10^6 miles).
53
10% of 92.9 is 9.29. This number, a simple fraction of Earth's distance to the
sun is the ratio of mass between Earth/Mars.
Earth's mass is 6.58 (10^21 tons) and Mars' mass is .708 (10^21 tons)
6.58/.708 = 9.29
Now since 92.9 (10^6 miles) is really 92.9 million miles, the actual fraction is
not 10% of the distance, it is 1/10,000,000 or 1/10^7
The 10% figure only shows up since we are expressing Earth's distance to
the sun in millions of miles or 10^6 miles.
So a simple fraction like one ten millionth of the Earth's distance to the sun is
the ratio of mass between the Earth and Mars!
92.9 is the key number and anyone can see how 9.29 a simple fraction of
that number does create the mass ratio of Earth/Mars.
Again, the key number is a number unique to Earth connected to the Creator
Formula.
92.9 is a unique number to Earth! 1/10^7 of that number is the mass ratio of
Earth/Mars.
So I have given an additional PROOF of how not only the circumferences of
the planets in the Creator Formula are aligned to Earth's unique
measurements.
I have also shown that the same key numbers are aligned to the mass ratios
of these planets to numbers unique to earth and the formula!
It is interesting to note, that two books that claimed to be of paranormally
channeled origin have been validated by my formula.
Sylvia Browne the renowned psychic stated in one of her books via her
channeled spirit guide that Venus at an earlier time had a much different
orbit.
Dolores Cannon quoted the infamous spirit of Nostradamus in one of her
channeled books that the wise Nostradamus claimed Uranus, Neptune and
Pluto were captured planets not originally from this solar system.
My formula is proof that both of the statements in these two channeled works
are scientific FACTS that could not have been known to either Ms. Browne or
Ms. Cannon before I revealed them in 2002.
54
My formula in the future is considered scientific fact much like E=MC^2 is
considered fact today.
Oh, in the future, E=MC^2 is slightly altered, it is not a universal constant.
The effects of Black Suns alter this formula.

http://www.Sollog.com
55
MERCURY/EARTH RATIO
MERCURY’S CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO TO THE EARTH IS THE SAME RATIO AS ITS

DISTANCE RATIO TO THE SUN AND EARTH IS. BOTH ARE .38%

RATIO 36/93 = .38
SATURN/EARTH RATIO


RATIO 93/890.8 = .10
SATURN CIRC. X .10 = EARTH CIRC.
MARS/EARTH RATIO
MARS’ CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IS THE SAME RATIO AS ITS ORBIT RATIO IS TO

EARTH BOTH ARE .53
MARS YEAR 687 DAYS

RATIO 365.25/687 = .53%
JUPITER/EARTH RATIO

RATIO 365.25/4331 = .08
56
.38 Special - THE GUN OF GOD!
Written by Sollog
July 2nd 2002
I’m sure you’ve heard of the .38 Special!
Well, the number .38 has now taken on a whole new significance!
GOD encoded this number into the circumference ratio relationship

between Mercury and Earth TO PROVE INTELLIGENT DESIGN to
our Solar System.
In 1995 I revealed a simple formula based upon ancient creation

myths in seven major religious beliefs. I called it THE CREATOR
FORMULA!
Yesterday, I found two clear and unarguably INTELLIGENTLY

DESIGNED CIRCUMFERENCE RATIOS within our solar system
validating my earlier work to such a degree that I’m sure many
more in the scientific community will now take notice to my claims!
The first ratio is .38. Just like in the famous .38 Special. Perhaps
this is THE GUN OF GOD designed to defeat the theory of chaos
and evolution.
The fact that the circumference ratio between Mercury and Earth is
.38 is no big deal. THE FACT IT IS ALSO THE DISTANCE RATIO
TO THE SUN BETWEEN BOTH PLANETS is absolute PROOF of
my earlier work THE CREATOR FORMULA! This is the first
PROOF of my theory from 1995. I also have found a second
PROOF that I will also reveal today!
The figures I am using in this PROOF came from NASA at
57
NASA states the distance of Mercury and Earth to the Sun is 36
(10^6 Miles) and 93 (10 ^6 Miles) respectively. That is a simple
ratio of .38 or 36/93.
The .38 Special!
NASA states the diameters of Mercury and Earth are 3032 (miles)
and 7926 (miles) respectively. Again the ratio between the two
numbers is .38 or 3032/7926.
I did not analyze any distance ratios in 1995 in my original work

known as THE CREATOR FORMULA!
The FACT that the Circumference ratio between these two planets
MATCHES the DISTANCE TO SUN Ratio is staggering PROOF of
intelligent design! It is PROOF of my earlier work THE CREATOR
FORMULA!
It is as if GOD decided to put this ratio there for me to FIND and

PROVE my theory of THE CREATOR FORMULA (acronym for
Circumference Ratio Earth and the Orbital Ratio/Rotations) is THE
SCIENTIFIC PROOF God wants people to search for in his divine
plan!
Exactly what I stated in 1995 has now been further validated with
hard scientific PROOF!
There is a clear design relationship as I stated in 1995 between the

planets circumferences in our solar system and their orbital figures.
Now if this was the only such ratio relationship between a

circumference and an orbital ratio, there could be slight argument
made against divine planning. It would be foolish, but hey, maybe a
coincidence against astronomical odds happened!
58
Well, there is a second PROOF for my theory, it was found
yesterday as well!
That is the relationship in the ratios between the orbits of Earth and
Mars and their circumferences!
This time it is not .38 but .53 that happens to connect two different
major measurements of these planets to a clearly DESIGNED ratio
relationship between the circumferences and the orbits of Earth and
Mars.
NASA states the orbit of Mars is 687 days and the orbit of Earth is
365.25 days. The ratio between the two numbers is 365.25/687 or
.53.
NASA states the diameters of Earth and Mars as 7926 (miles) and
4222 (miles) respectively.
The ratio between these two numbers is 4222/7926 or .53.
What this means is simple.
THE CIRCUMFERENCE RATIOS between Earth, Mars and

Mercury are connected to exact ratios between orbital distances to
the sun and orbital time.
My original work stating there was a relationship between the

Circumference of Earth and Orbital Rotations/Ratios established
relationships between earth and other planets as simple fractions of
base measurements unique to earth, those being its orbit and
circumference.
While the numbers above are Diameter measurements from NASA,

they are the basis of a circumference measurement for these
59
planets. If I wanted to show the actual circumference ratios above I
would have merely multiplied the Diameters by Pi.
My theory in 1995 stated there was a clear ratio relationship

between earth and other planets! Ratios that changed from planet
to planet, but ratios that showed clear DESIGN to other planets
based upon measurements unique to earth!
The two ratios I have found as explained above, now validate my

claim!
And they validate the CREATOR FORMULA in a much clearer

scientific way than the numbers I put forth in 1995 did.
All one has to do is look at the numbers put out by NASA for
Mercury, Earth and Mars.
Then ask yourself, does the circumference ratios between Earth

and these planets match other major measurements?
.38 and .53 PROVE they do!
Most people do not have the mathematical or scientific background

to fully understand all of this information, and comprehend just
HOW ASTRONOMICALLY AGAINST THE ODDS the fact that
these ratios exist is numerically!
These ratios are not some new law of physics that is a constant like
gravity. These ratios are there, but hidden. They don’t follow a law.
They are merely simple relationships that should NOT BE THERE,
yet they exist.
The reason these relationships exist is they were DESIGNED into

the measurements of our planets. In a universe of Chaos, the fact
60
that these ratios are there would be ASTRONOMICALLY
impossible!
Exactly as I stated in 1995, there is a clear SCIENTIFIC

ratio/relationship between the measurements of earth and other
planets in our Solar System!
I have now found two such ratios that PROVE my theory!
There is no scientific law to explain this clearly intelligently

designed ratio/relationship between Earth and other planets!
Earths circumference ratios to Mercury and Mars in a theory of

Chaos should have no relationship to either the distance between
the Earth and Mercury to the Sun or the relationship to the orbits of
Earth and Mars.
YET IT DOES as I have shown above!
So the next time you hear someone was shot with a .38 Special,
remember GOD used that same number to shoot down the theory
of Chaos!
The planets in our solar system were DESIGNED around numbers

unique to earth! .38 and .53 are the PROOF!
61
The Pi Variance of Titius-Bodes
The Planet Distance Formula
July 8th 2002
Someone emailed a question about Titius-Bodes as a possible link to my Creator

Formula. So this is my reply.
The Creator Formula creates circumferences of the inner planets to an

exacting degree based upon the uniqueness of the circumfernce of the earth
and the ratio that number creates to inner planets circumferences as well as
orbital distances and paths. It is not an explanation of Titius-Bodes.
However, the theory of Titius–Bodes when modified to an xPi/y variance I

have discovered is an excellent way to see THE DESIGN to the spacing of
the planets within this Solar System.
The theory of Titius-Bodes is simply explained as a relationship to the

distances of the planets in this solar system to the sun to a sequence of
numbers that are created by a doubling of the previous number and the
addition of 4 to create a number that equates to the harmonic location of our
solar systems planets Aphelion (furthest distance to sun) orbital
measurements.
It is expressed as planet distance to sun = n + 4 /10
Where n = 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384
Basically the numbers start doubling at 3 to create the sequence.
Fans of this theory believe it creates the approximate distance to the sun
between the planets with one major exception, that being Neptune.
You also have to believe one of the numbers represents a planet between
Mars and Jupiter that is believed by some to have been destroyed.
When this theory was put forth, the outer planets that are not visible to the
eye were unknown. The discovery of Uranus seemed to validate the theory.
62
However, the discovery of Neptune and Pluto put this theory on a back
burner to most in astro-physics.
If we use the mean distance for Pluto instead of the Aphelion, the theory
does give an approximate location fairly well.
Some criticize my Creator Formula for having a constant variance of either

.001 or .005.
The variance in Titius-Bodes is many times higher than my own Creator

Formula. The error margin is close to 10 Percent on some planets.
I have revealed below an addition to this theory based upon a multiple of

xPi/y that greatly improves the variance in this theory. In fact using my xPi/y
formula you can say Titius-Bodes-Sollog is now within .01 accuracy! That is a
quantum leap in accuracy for this now important solar distance formula!
The correct Titius-Bodes theorem for the planets should be
= n +4/10 – xPi/y
n = original Titius sequence 0, 3, 6, etc
where x = 1,2,3,3^2
and y = 10, 100
y = 100 when n <100
y = 10 when n > 100
As one can see my formula uses a variance of xPi/y for every planet in our
solar system with one exception, that being Neptune!
Such a formula that is now to within .01 accuracy shows a DESIGN aspect to
the solar system!
I have added a unique equation to explain Neptune as well.
63
The distribution of x in my improvement to Titius-Bodes shows a harmonic
coupling of numbers in logical order much like a scale in a musical piece.
1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3 appear in logical order then we have a progression from 2 to 3

to 3^2. A very logical and intelligent design aspect to the formula!
The charts below show the actual current measurements of the distances of
the planets in our solar system, the original numbers suggested by the Titius-
Bodes theory and then my own improved numbers showing the harmonic
distribution of simple multiples of xPi/y in the equation.
Some believe Neptune is on an inevitable march to a merging with Jupiter

into an eventual star ignition. I just know it is located where a simple Pi
formula gives it a logical location to the other numbers used in my Pi
variance. Yes it is an exception, however its location does align to a nice Pi
formula.
I have showed this formula to mathematically place Neptune at

Pi^3 – Pi x 100.
If we consider that the asteroid belt is the remnants of a planet that was
destroyed, then Neptune was the 9th Planet at one time. 9 is 3^2. The
distance of Neptune with this formula is then 2781.9 which in the Titius-
Bodes scale creates a number very closely aligned to either the Mean or
Aphelion distance of Neptune!
Here are the numbers that show the distribution of the orbit distances of
every planet in our solar system (Neptune excepted) is tuned to the numbers
of Titius-Bodes if you use my new Pi variance formula.
Anyone can easily see the improvement my –xPi/y variance gives to Titius-
Bodes for the planets.
Enjoy
64
The Titius-Bodes Variance
= n +4/10 – xPi/y
when n = original Titius-Bodes sequence 0, 3, 6, etc.
where x = 1,2,3, 3^2
and when n = <100; y = 100
when n = > 100; y = 10
Neptune Exception
Pi^3-Pi
Mercury –Pi/100 = Mean Distance

Mercury + Pi/100 = Aphelion
Venus – Pi/100 = Aphelion
Earth –2Pi/100 = Aphelion
Mars –2Pi/100 = Aphelion
Asteroid Belt –3Pi/100
Jupiter –3Pi/100 = Aphelion
Saturn 2Pi/10 = Aphelion
Uranus 3Pi/10 = Aphelion
Neptune (exception ) Pi^3–Pi
Pluto 3^2Pi/10 = Mean
Mercury to Jupiter Factor Progression of Pi/100
1 Mercury
1 Venus
2 Earth
2 Mars
3 Asteroid Belt
3 Jupiter
Factor Progression of Saturn, Uranus and Pluto Pi/10
65
2 Saturn
3 Uranus
3^2 Pluto
n determines two divisions of bodies, inner are planets near the sun out to
Jupiter. Outer are Saturn, Uranus and Pluto.
There is only one exception that being Neptune, which happens to be at a

distance of a cube of Pi minus Pi.
The first six progressions of the inner planets show a beautiful pairing of the
numbers 1, 2 and 3. What harmony!
The last three outer planets (Neptune excepted) show a perfectly logical
progression of the factoring of Pi. 2 Pi, then 3Pi then 3^2 Pi! Again it shows
an intelligent and logical progression of the factoring of Pi.
The reduction of /100 to /10 is also a logical change, since that change
manifests once n = >10^2 .
This formula produces the Aphelion Distance to the sun of the planets with
the exception of Mercury and Pluto, where it produces the Mean.
The Aphelion of Mercury is created by using +Pi/100 instead of

–Pi/100 which creates the Mean distance of Mercury to the sun.
The formula produces the Mean distance to the first and last planets in the
sequence! This once again shows intelligent design. It’s as if the designer
said, “Let’s start and end this solar system with Mean variances, while we
align all the other planet variances to Aphelion.”
The fact that Aphelion was aligned instead of Mean seven times in a row is
like flipping a coin to heads seven times in a row. First you flip tails, then you
flip heads seven times then you flip tails! Try it and see how long it takes to
occur!
66
Planet Distance to Sun Titius-Bodes Sollog
(10^8 Miles)
Aphelion
M=Mean
Mercury .36M .4 .3685
Venus .677 .7 .668
Earth .945 1 .937
Mars 1.549 1.6 1.537
X Asteroid Belt 2.8 2.705
Jupiter 5.074 5.2 5.1057
Saturn 9.411 10 9.37
Uranus 18.664 19.6 18.657
Neptune 28.245 skip 27.864
Pluto 36.472 M 38.8 35.97
Notes
-Pi/100 creates the Mean Distance of Mercury

+ Pi/100 creates the Aphelion
67
Three New Planets To Be Discovered
July 9th 2002
In the near future man will discover three planets beyond Pluto. These are
the 11th, 12th and 13th planets that were designed to be part of this solar
system. Although, they may actually be the 12th, 13th and 14th planets (I’ll
explain that in a moment).
Contrary to popular belief, planet X or the tenth planet is already known. The
asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter at one time was the orbit of a planet.
Once this is understood, then the furthest planet at this time in the solar
system known by man as Pluto becomes the tenth planet to the sun.
At times Neptune is actually further from the sun than Pluto. Such a period
just occurred from 1979 to 1999, the planet Neptune was technically the
furthest planet from the sun in our solar system for those recent 20 years.
Pluto is now once again further than Neptune to the sun.
Pluto has a very unusual orbit due to gravitational pull exerted upon it by
planets yet to be discovered by man; planets that are further to the sun than
Pluto.
I will give the distance of the orbits of all three of these yet discovered planets
to the sun in this thesis. In time, when each planet is discovered and it is
found to be in an orbit distance I have given in this work, people will realize
that my recent discovery of an addition variance to Titius-Bodes Law is
correct. My addition variance to
Titius –Bodes allows me to give a fairly exact distance for the orbits of the
11th, 12th and 13 planets in this solar system.
What many will call planet X will be located at an orbital distance to the sun
of 68.72 10^8 Miles. That is 6 Billion and 872 Million miles to the sun! By
contrast, earth is only 93 Million miles and Pluto is 3.6 Billion.
Without my variance, the original Titius-Bodes Law estimates a planet

beyond Pluto should be located at 77.2 (10^8 Miles)
68
In my original Titus-Bodes addition variance, the last planet I used my
variance on was Pluto. The variance was 3^2Pi/10. I am using a simple
progression of 3^2Pi/10 for this hereto unknown planet. That progression is
3^3Pi/10.
3^3Pi/10 = 8.48. That is the amount I need to subtract from the Titius-Bodes
Law estimate of 77.2 for this unknown planet.
77.2 – 8.48 = 68.72
There is also the possibility that another orbit exists within 68.72 at 58.87
(10^8 Miles).
The reason I say this, is it is my belief that more planets exist that align
mathematical to my exception rule for Neptune as theorized in my original
Titius-Bodes addition variance work.
A logical progression of my Neptune exception rule of Pi^3-Pi is 2Pi^3-Pi =

58.87.
If a planet is found in an orbit that is a progression of the Neptune Exception

in my addition variance to Titius-Bodes, then the collision in the asteroid belt
was actually two planets in this Solar System. That is why I said above the
next planets discovered could also be the 12th, 13th and 14th planets once it is
accepted that two planets collided in the asteroid belt!
The unknown planet that collided with a planet location known to exist due to
Titius-Bodes in the asteroid belt was actually a planet aligned to the Neptune
exception rule of my original addition variance to Titius-Bodes.
It is logical that planet would have been located in a Pi^2-Pi orbit. That would
have placed it near a .672 (10^8 Miles) orbit. That is a little outside of Jupiter.
But the mass of Jupiter could have greatly affected the orbit bringing it into
the asteroid belt and the Planet X orbit and a collision of two planets would
have then logically created the asteroid belt.
If this planet did exist, then Neptune is not an exception. Neptune would then
be part of a six-planet sequence, and it would be the third part of an 18-
planet solar system based upon the concept of a carbon 12 atom or three
sets of six particles (planets to us).
69
The inner planets follow a set of six numbers as I explained in my earlier
work on Titius-Bodes. The outer planets follow a second set of six numbers
and Neptune along with the planet that collided with the asteroid belt planet X
belong to a third group of six numbers.
A carbon 12 atom has 6 protons, 6 electrons and 6 neutrons around a large

nucleus (sun).
These three groups of six have a numerical relationship similar to that being
shown in my addition variance to Titius-Bodes formula.
When a planet is found in a planetary orbit at 58.87, that discovery will be the
key to this theory.
If such an orbit is verified that aligns to my Neptune exception sequence,

then the formula for these six bodies should be
1st Unknown Planet (Asteroid Belt Collision) Pi^2-Pi (6.72 10^8 Miles)
Neptune Pi^3-Pi (27.86 10^8 Miles)
Planet Y (Yod) 2Pi^3-Pi (58.87 10^8 Miles)
Planet El-Sollog 3Pi^3-Pi (89.87 10^8 Miles)
5th Planet Sequence 3^2Pi^3-Pi (275.91 10^8 Miles)
6th Planet Sequence 3^3Pi^3-Pi (834.02 10^8 Miles)
This six planets would be unknown in the Titius-Bodes Law. So far we know
a planet should have existed in the asteroid belt from Titius-Bodes Law. If the
first planet in the Neptune sequence did collide with the asteroid belt planet,
then we will be discovering a new planet near 58.87 (10^8 Miles).
There are also three additional planets in the Saturn sequence.
The Saturn variance sequence as I started to explain in my initial addition

variance to Titius-Bodes is as follows.
Saturn 2Pi/y=100
Uranus 3 Pi/y=10
Pluto 3^2 Pi/y=10
70
I am adding these three sequences to explain the variances where future
planets will be found aligned to the Titius-Bodes Law and my variance
addition.
Planet Z (Zeta) 3^3Pi/y=10

5Th Planet in Saturn Sequence 3^3Pi^2/y=10
6th Planet in Saturn Sequence 3^3Pi^3/y=10
I would have to amend my addition variance to Titius-Bodes in the following

manner to explain where the following planet orbits will be found according to
the Titius-Bodes Law.
I would have to add 3^3 to my x set
I would have to create a z variable for the Pi exponent, so z = 2,3
My original addition variance to Titius-Bodes was
= n + 4/10 – xPi/y
where n = original numbers in Titius-Bodes Sequence
where x = 2, 3, 3^2
where y = 100 if n < 100 or y = 10 if n > 100
This explains the correct orbits of Saturn, Uranus and Pluto.
My final addition variance to Titius-Bodes that will explain where the

additional three planets in the Saturn sequence will be found is
= n +4/10 – xPi^z/y
where n – original number in Titius-Bodes Sequence
where x = 2, 3, 3^2, 3^3
where y = 100 if n < 100 or y = 10 if n > 100
71
So according to my Saturn sequence variance addition to
Titius-Bodes there are three more planet orbits in this sequence past Pluto.
These are separate orbits from the additional four I have already located in
my Neptune sequence formula as stated above.
These three orbits are located at
Planet Z (Zeta) 3^3Pi/y=10 (68.72 10^8 Miles Titius-Bodes = 77.2)

5Th Planet in Saturn Sequence 3^3Pi^2/y=10 (147.1174 Bodes=154)
6th Planet in Saturn Sequence 3^3Pi^3/y=10 (279.694 Bodes= 307.6)
There is a slight possibility that y =1 when n > 1000. I doubt it, but it could
occur. This would put the orbit of the 5th Planet of the Saturn sequence stated
above inside the orbit of the 4th. I doubt it, but I have to mention it. This would
create real havoc on the outer end of the solar system. Perhaps this is a built
in trigger to create collisions to cause decay. This would be similar to the
concept of atomic decay or possibly an explanation of particle collisions
within an atom.
To summarize the conclusions that I have come to above; the solar system
we live in as carbon based entities was designed based upon the simple
principal of a carbon12 atom. That being three sets of particles (planets) with
mathematical connections to each other.
This could possibly mean that our concept of gravity is actually the product of
electromagnetic attraction to the sun similar to the particles within an atom.
The Titius-Bodes Law could closely locate up to 12 orbits in our solar system.
My variance addition correctly aligns the error margin within Titius-Bodes.
My concept of Neptune being part of a third orbital sequence of 6 orbits

easily explains why there was a planetary collision in the asteroid belt of two
planets in this solar system.
I have given theoretical locations for three more orbits aligned to Titius-Bodes
Law. I have expanded upon my addition variance to Titius-Bodes to better
align the orbits to where they should be found.
I have theoretically located with my Neptune sequence four planet orbits

beyond Neptune that are aligned to Neptune instead of the Titius-Bodes Law.
72
I have also located an inner Neptune orbit location that explains the asteroid
belt collision of most probably two planets. One planet aligned to Titius-
Bodes and one planet aligned to my Neptune sequence theory.
In time, as more and more planets are discovered and their orbits are located
where I have theorized, the proof that I am correct will be evident.
If there are no more planets aligned to Neptune, then I am wrong and

Neptune is no more than a Free Radical is in an atom.
I doubt this is true, since there would then be no clear explanation for the
collision that created the asteroid belt, which my theory above neatly
explains.
I have explained not only why the asteroid belt was formed, but located the
original orbit locations where these planets once were located.
I have fully explained the Neptune anomaly of Neptune to Titius-Bodes. And I

have given what I believe will be prove to be accurate locations of orbits of
many planets yet to be discovered.
We are on the cusp of seeing some of these new planetary discoveries!
Now that you have read my work, you will not be surprised when the
discovery of these planets occur and they are located as I theorized!
Everything is explainable in a well structured, ordered and DESIGNED Solar

System or Universe.
I think it is most appropriate that man, a carbon based DESIGNED entity,

finds out that his world is part of an atomic recreation of the very substance
of his being!
For many years I have warned that WE MUST STOP ALL NUCLEAR
REACTIONS!
Every atom we destroy is located within another dimension. These atoms

that we are destroying are WHOLE SOLAR SYSTEMS or perhaps even a
universe!
73
Even the little quark can be explained in the cosmogony I have outlined
above. Satellites around planets or moons are similar to the quark theory.
Some planets have them and some don’t just like the particles of a carbon 12
atom!
Some planets are charged just like charge particles within a carbon 12 atom,
some are not!
The alignment of 18 orbits will prove this theory!
Our sun is but the nucleus in a carbon 12 atom in a whole different

dimension.
We must stop all nuclear reactions on our home, the earth.
As more planets are discovered in the future and they align to my theory
above, my work will become the basis of astro-physics. I understand how my
work will result in things like planets being named for me.
I take no credit for this work. I have stated since 1995 that what knowledge I
am revealing comes from what humans consider to be GOD!
Only GOD could have revealed through me what I have explained above. It is
the divine plan for our solar system.
The Hebrew name for God is El, that is why I ask when future planets are
found in the orbits I theorized that Gods name El be adjoined to mine so
credit can be given where it is due.
El-Sollog means Gods planet as foretold by his humble servant Sollog.
In love, light and darkness I give this truth to the world.
Shalom,
Sollog
The Word of One
74
Thank you for viewing our FREE Sample Version of
The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula
You can download the full version at http://www.1ebooks.com/creator
We have many FREE SAMPLE eBooks at http://www.1eBooks.com
About the Author Sollog.
Besides being one of the most discussed mystics on the Net, Sollog is the
author of over 30 books. A few of them are:
Prophecies of Sollog
The Secret of Fatima
God of Quakes – The Line of Ennosageus
Nichiren Dai Shonin – Letters for Mappo
Jesus Is Not God! – The Biblical Proof
The Point of Creation
Final Judgment
Love Is The Answer
ONE
ONE THE TRUTH
Secret of the Great Pyramid
The Book of Lucifer (Translation by Sollog)
The Lucifer Conspiracy
TEMPLAR
You can find Sollog’s books at http://www.1ebooks.com/sollog
He has also released 2 CD’s of New Age Music. His music is regularly in the
top 100 for their categories at www.MP3.com/sollog
You can learn more about Sollog at www.Sollog.com
Sollog is the founder of TOH – Temple Of Hayah. It is the fastest growing

religious movement in the world!
You can learn more about TOH at http://www.TOH.bz
75

The Creator Formula - The Proof of God! (Sample)

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

The Creator Formula - The Proof of God! (Sample)

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

2

Sollog Immanuel Adonai-Adoni

Sollog’s website www.Sollog.com

Electronic Copyright 2002 Adoni Publishing

Distributed Electronically through 1 E Books

I originally revealed The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula in 1995 in the City of

All of my work hinges upon my connection to The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula. It

The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula PROVES a CREATOR exists, since it proves

My writings such as The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula and my Prophecies have

I hope you enjoy this updated version of The C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula!

C.R.E.A.T.O.R. is an acronym for Circumference Ratio Earth And The Orbit

In 1995 in the City of Philadelphia Pennsylvania, I revealed what is now

One of these works is known as The POINT of CREATION, which is a theory

Some of the pages in this book contain Prophecies.

So an actual date like a year can mean several things.

It can be a literal date, or it can be an allegorical date.

Sollog has hit exact dates for future events.

1999 can also be 9991 in reverse.

Mathematical Discoveries of Sollog

Update – PDF – Planetary Distance Formula

C.R.E.A.T.O.R. Formula - Proof of God

GOD of Quakes – The Line of Ennosageus

Asteroid 1999 VP11

The Church of Satan

The Signs - Days of Judgment - Prophecies

The Safe Zones

AN AMAZING CONNECTION BETWEEN THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE

IT IS WHAT EINSTELN CALLED THE GRAND UNIFICATIQN THEORY (GUT).

IT’S ACTUALLY A VERY SIMPLE FORMULA BASED UPON ANCIENT

IT’S VERY INTERESTING TO NOTE, THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN RELIGIOUS

IS THIS A LOST PYTHAGOREAN FORMULA? AFTER ALL, A GREEK

THE KNOWN AVERAGE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EARTH IS 24,881 MILES.

NOW, THE CUBE IS MATHEMATI CALLY OBSERVED IN EUCLID THEORY, AS

THAT’S ALSO A FACT. AS IS THE KNOWN MEASUREMENTS GIVEN ABOVE

THE AMOUT OF DAYS IN A HUNDRED YEARS IS 36,525 DAYS (PLUS OR

36,525 IS ALSO THE AMOUNT OF ROTATIONS THAT THE EARTH MAKES IN

THIS IS THE SIMPLE FORML.A FOR THE EARTHS CIRCUMFERENCE!

BY THE ECULID DIMENSIONS OF A CUBE WHICH IS 6812

THE ANSWER IS EXACTLY

THE AVERAGE KNOWN CIRCUMFERENCE I ALREADY STATED ABOVE!

SO, THE CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT FOR THE EARTH IS

ONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE MYTHOS OF ANCIENT CIVILATIONS AND

THE FORMULA FOR THE PLANETS AND THEIR ORBITS, IS ACTUALLY

CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO EARTH ALIGNED TO ORBIT RATIOS

THE MILE IS CONNECTED TO ANCIENT MYTHS IN GREECE, WHICH SAYS

UNLIKE THE MAN MADE MEASURING UNIT KNOWN AS THE METRIC

THE MOST IMPORTANT NUMBERS IN THE FORMULA CAN ALL BE DIRECTLY

THIS SIMPLE FORMULA, PROVES THAT THE INTELLIGENCE THAT

HOW CAN I MAKE SUCH A CLAIM?

AND, THE NUMBERS THAT FORMULA GENERATE, MAGICALLY APPEAR IN

IT BASICALLY PROVES BEYOND A DOUBT, NOT ONLY INTELLIGENT DESIGN

SCIENTISTS POINT OUT WHAT THEY PERCEIVED TO BE AN ERROR IN

THIS FORMULA PROVES GOD DID IT EXACTLY THAT WAY.

THE EARTH’S CIRCUMFERENCE WAS DECIDED UPON BY GOD, AS BEING

AND THEN, EVEN MORE AMAZING, IS THAT THE ICONOGRAPHY OF 100

IT IS TRULY THE GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY, WHICH EINSTEIN

TO SHOW HOW PERFECT THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE CIRCUMFERENCE

THAT IS EXACTLY 248.8 YEARS OR 1% X 24,881

THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF MERCURY TO EARTH IS THE SAME RATIO AS ITS

DISTANCE MERCURY TO EARTH TO SUN = .38

CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO MERCURY TO EARTH = .38

THIS RATIO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DISTANCE OF A PLANET AND

DISTANCE OF SATURN TO EARTH TO SUN = .10

CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO EARTH TO SATURN = .10