Transference-The
Organization of Experience
(written in collaboration with Frank M. Lachmann)
28
TRANSFERENCE-THE ORGANIZATION OF EXPERIENCE 29
CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF TRANSFERENCE
Transference as Regression
Transference as Displacement
Transference as Projection
Analysts who draw upon the theoretical ideas of Melanie Klein tend to
conceptualize transference as a manifestation of the mechanism of pro-
jection. Racker (1954), for example, viewed transference as the projec-
34 CHAPTER THREE
Transference as Distortion
tion of the proper analytic attitude for facilitating the unfolding and n,
lumination of the patient's transference experience.
ance. Later we shall present our objections to this notion that transfer~
ence is to be resolved or renounced. In the present context we wish to
stress that, in our view, the persistence of transference is not primarily
the product of resistance. It is the result of the continuing influence of
established organizing principles when alternative modes of e x p e r i e n c ~
ing the self and object world have not yet evolved or become suffi~
ciently consolidated. We would thus replace Gill's "resistance to the
resolution of the transference" with the concept of resistance based on
transference. This would encompass all of the anticipated dangers and
resulting constrictions of the patient's psychological life that appear in
direct consequence of the transference having become firmly estab~
lished, including those forfeitures of self~experience that the patient b e ~
lieves are necessary to maintain the analytic relationship. As we
elaborate in detail in the chapters that follow, such resistance cannot
be understood psychoanalytically apart from the intersubjective c o n ~
texts in which it arises and recedes.
events of the previous session and determine for himself whether, in~
deed, he may have directly or indirectly conveyed annoyance to the
patient. He might then acknowledge the "reality" of the patient's per~
ception and then proceed to analyze the patient's reactions.
A disadvantage of the first position (that transference emanates e n ~
tirely from the patient) is that it requires the patient to relinquish his
organizing principles and psychic reality in favor of the analyst's. We
object to the second view because, like the first, it places the analyst in
the position of evaluating the veracity of the patient's perceptions, and
the patient's experience is validated only because it coincides with that
of the analyst. At its worst, this approach can tip the therapeutic bal~
ance in the direction of making the analyst's "reality" an explanation
for the patient's reactions. The danger here lies in endowing the p a ~
tient's perceptions with "truth" and "reality," not through the analytic
process, but through the analyst's judgments.
Our own view is different from each of the two foregoing positions.
When transference is conceptualized as organizing activity, it is a ~
sumed that the patient's experience of the therapeutic relationship is
always shaped both by inputs from the analyst and by the structures of
meaning into which these are assimilated by the patient. We would
therefore do away with the rule of abstinence and its corresponding
concept of neutrality and replace them with an attitude of sustained
empathic inquiry, which seeks understanding of the patient's e x p r e s ~
sions from within the perspective of the patient's subjective frame of
reference. From this vantage point, the reality of the patient's p e r c e p ~
tions of the analyst is neither debated nor confirmed. Instead, these
perceptions serve as points of departure for an exploration of the
meanings and organizing principles that structure the patient's psychic
reality.
This investigatory stance will itself have an impact on the transfer~
ence. The patient's feeling of being understood, for example, can re~
vive archaic oneness or merger experiences, which in turn may
produce therapeutic effects (Silverman, Lachmann, and Milich, 1982).
This brings us once again to the developmental dimension of the trans~
ference and its therapeutic action.
Transference Cures
Resolution of Transference
CONCLUSION