by
Robert J. Lindsay
i
Page
(b) Effect on Structural Form ••• 74
. .. .. ..
• •
(c) Effect on Installation. • • • • • 78
(d) Effect on Maintenance • • • • • • • • • 84
Effect of lee - Conclusion. • • • • • • • •
Section II - Rivera and Streams of Variable Stage. •
Effect in General • • • • • • • • • • • • •
... ... .. . . . 84
84
86
Effect on Position. • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• 86
Effect on Structural Form • • • • • ... .. 89
Effect on Installation. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 99
Effect on Maintenance • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 99
CHAPTER IV "Illustrations of Some Typical Intakes"
Foreword • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 101
Tower Intake Fig. 19 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 102
Intake in a Bay - Fig. 2o(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 103
River Intake- Fig. 20(b). • • • • • • • •••••••••••• 103
Submerged Crib Intake - Fig. 21. • • • • • • • • • 104
Shore-Intake with Dry-Well - Fig. 22 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 105
CHAPTER V - "The Experimental Investigation - Scope, Theory, Object
and Limits"
General Scope. • • • • • • • • •••••••••• 106
Terms of Reference • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 107
Specifie Assumptions • • • • • • • • • • • • • 111
The Hypothe sis • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 113
Discrete Particle Theory • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 114
Experimental Objectives - Summary. • • • • • • • • • • ••••• 115
Limits of Investigation. • • • • • • • • ••••••••••• 116
CHAPTER VI "The Experiment, Apparatus, Procedure and Observations"
- ii -
PREFACE
plants, the water intake has been the subject of very little research.
water intakes will serve to establish this statement. One might conclude,
expediency and not experiment has been responsible for the details of
&
water intakes. When on considera that the very operation, efficient or
to the thesis (Appendix A) has been divided into three parts, separating
the pertinent and relevant material from that which is general and vague.
on the North American continent and which would be in keeping with modern
fifty thousand persons, without excluding at the same time, the necessary
and valuable consideration of the larger intakes which serve the metro-
politan areas.
test flume and for the assistance of his staff in the erection of the
apparatus; to Mr. Wellington Chen, B•Eng. (Civil) '59, for his assistance
Robert J. Lindsay
Montreal, Quebec
August 1960
CHAPTER I
persona. In all but a few of these, water for domestic purposes was
adjacent cities for their water supply. Among the remaining self-
sufficient ninety per cent, the sources of raw-water were as follows (*38):
industrial concerna for their own use, are not included in the statistics
These findings are in accord with the general rule that in any
locality, .where ground water and surface water resources are equally
* Bibliography Reference
2
choice will generally favour the surface supply. While the rule tends
for their manufactured products, but also an abundant and cheap supply
conditioned homes and business premises, the increasing demand for public
point to an increase in the number of gallons per capita, per day, (gcd)
water consumption in the United States ranged between 45 gcd and 175 gcd
(u.s.), with a probable average of llO gcd (u.s.). In 1947, Mr. Steel
had already revised the average value upward to 135 gcd (u.s.). Modern
Among the resulting effects, the following are important to the investi-
with the intake structure itself - the water intake proper - as opposed
to the intake system which normally includes the intake proper, the con-
duit between the intake and the shore, and the shore-well or suction
well.
most intake systems is shown in Fig. 1, Page 5. The function of the in-
quired quantity, to the intake system. The conduit between the intake
and the shore serves to convey this raw-water to the suction inlets of
though they may be, are beyond the scope of this investigation; these
i nto; River Intakes, Lake Intakes and Intakes from Impounding Reservoirs,
,fo
Intakes on Va r iable Streams (*1). However authori t a tive the wri ter, this
details, or to emphasize and explain the details which make the instal-
stage, but frazil ice formation at low winter flows constitutes the real
will exist.
intakes into two categorie5; namely, those which are common to all
(Chapter II), and those which are of special importance (Chapter III).
CHAPTER II
re quiremen t:
tenance of pressure.
of operation.
The Common Problems. The design of any water intake requires the
in any given situation, for reasons which are quite apart from water
fine the 11
location-survey" to its proper role, and the resulting cost
to a reasonable sum.
3. Shallow areas where the fetch of the wind will produce waves of
may be expected.
"location-survey."
data required and to make sure that all salient points, such
and up-to-date.
value of "location-surveys":-
II The Problem of Structural Form. Once the preferable position for the
intake has been determined, the designer can turn attention to the prob-
lem of structural form and the evaluation of the factors which will
IV. For the moment, only a summary description will be given. In the
addition to which must be added the further asset that, within limits,
16
position and depth of the inlet ports is generally fixed and the
operation with low maintenance cost; they can be, and have been,
reasons have made them particularly suitable for lake intakes, al-
iii) Branching the end of the intake conduit with pipes of smaller
on or near shores where deep water is available, and they are very
often designed as units housing bath the intake proper and the
for any great length of intake conduit and as a result, this form
where:
trench 22 feet below the river-bed. The Trench is 100 feet from
shore and parallel thereto; the maximum depth of water in the river
layer of clay was placed over the gravel and the remainder of the
million in the river water to only traces in the raw water delivered
131 cfs; the excess is impounded b.y a low-diversion dam, and with-
combined capacity of the siphons is 3,100 cfs. When the river dis-
charge exceeds the capacity of the whole works, water flows over
the dam as in the case of a suppressed weir. Here, the use of fully
particularly difficult. They are the exceptions and not the rule;
follow.
considerations.
portance:
state that:
i) WAVES
where Ht = height
above pool level at which the
force of the waves may be considered
to act, feet.
Hw,V =as previously defined.
g = acceleration due to gravity, taken
as 32.2 feet/sec./sec.
Generally, Ht is about three-eigbths of Hw.
60 m.p.h.
26
applicable:
Minimum Values:
as follows:
concerned:
r/ M. s. Ketchum = 20 - 30 lbs./sq.ft. on
Vertical Projection
the broadest meaning of the term and which produce intakes whose
unreliability.
32
tain it in position.
conduit.
sediments and algae; when seas onal variat i ons in current and
being set one, two or more inches apart and placed in front of
the intake ports. The bars may be of cast iron, steel, wood or
a unit and are set with the bars in a vertical position; their
authors agree; for this reason, they are not discussed further.
because, in his view, either they are too effective and become
clogged with debris and ice, in which case the intake as a whole
The Inlet Ports. The design of the inlet ports involves decisions
removed.
absent from the accounts in many cases (*12, *14, *23, *24, *37).
For the moment however, the question of the shape of the inlet
take precedence.
entrance velocities.
ii) Shape of the Inlet Port. Reference has already been made
lets and the reasons for their use. However simple the
wa ter sur face. At the point "N", a dis tance L fee t from
Pl = P2 = wzl = wz2
where ~ = z 2 and w = weight of water in lbs/cu.ft.
,.·:.·..
. , ~-~
':" --~-
---·-··-..----r---1-,.---~
.. .
·.
•·
.~
.
·•.
, .
. ..
...
~-
Q
-- . .·~·..
--- ·- --Q
~
6
• ...,
.
.. ..• •
. ·:
· r
, {
~ .• .. ..
, •· ..
Since z1 = z2 by assumption:
v2 v2
.!L - _!g_ =
2 1
(Eq. 1)
w w 2g 2g
This Equation can be translated as:
or, equiva1ent1y:
or,
v2 Q2
v2 92
1 2
and
2g = 2 2g = 21!). 2
2gA 2
1
whence Equation 1 above becomes:
ga ti on.
state that:
conditions.
Consequen tly,
is about 6:1.
ships that are not very far from those recommended for
draft tubes.
- ··-·- ·-
-....-
~aenr o/ Ü/.sch6~ge ·c ··
. , . ,
J/a/ns tj 8" tl "-tl s·- # ./.1 "• /5" 22 #- 30
1
'
1
1
/ . (; z~ _J)
-1
'
-----·---}) - . ----·-i-
j __ - - !
Di.ensional relationships for the
1
curvature of the aouth taten f roa
- .., tJ. 'zsiJ'---- "Handbook of Hydraulics" - DNG-
Jrd. Edition - McGraw Hill
hdvr<: "5
Dimensional relationships for the
curvature of the aouth taken from
"Hydraulics" - Rusaell -
5th Edition, Holt & Co.
45
(b) Where the taper must exceed 10°, the leading edges
contracted stream.
generally satisfactory.
extent.
iii) The Position of the Inlet Port. This facet of the design
current.
pounding reservoir.
excellent.
preferred.
chapters.
might be significant:
49
i) The introduction of any structure into a surface supply
stance:
1
1
- ---
Fig.8 - Intake Basin adjacent
to river of high velocity.
( See also Fig.lO, Page 80)
52
structures) situated at the outlet from the
J_ j
1
1
J.oJ
...
carried out with efficiency and safety. Except for a general summary,
discussion of the many procedures and methods which have been resorted
to in the past would be beyond the scope of the present treatise, and
for this _reason the following outline presents the larger considerations
only:
Azerier.
foundations.
from the very outset, should be foreseen and provided for in the follow-
ing ways:
this point is very clear, endorsed by all authors and almost a self-
that sorne form of maintenance is normally required from time to time, and
carried out with efficiency and thrift. Briefly, the problem is that of
with the free flow of raw water through the intake and intake conduit.
III, and not considered here. For the moment, two contingencies will be
conduit.
covering the entrance ports of the intakes. Waterlogged branches, water weeds,
rags, paper, garbage and trash of all kinàs, have in the pas t found their
increases the entrance velocity and suction head at the port, which in
pressures which will cause the smaller trash components to become firmly
lodged in the openings between the bars, or to Pass through these openings
the above methods, clearing operations can be carried out at close ran~
Where the intake is submerged, the most obvious solution, and often
smaller, less expensive intake units are the primary concern of this
interest and will be discussed in some detail towards the end of the
present chapter.
unwanted deposits of silt, mud and detritus from the intake and intake
by the self-scouring flow velocity within the conduit. For shore intakes,
For towers, particularly "dry" towers where mesh screens are installed
like all submerged cribs, are quite frequently devoid of all straining
deviees, screening being delayed until the raw water arrives at the
commonly advocated, and published reports (*3, *5) indicate that this
lodge and clear away the accumulations mentioned before. If one assumes
that the back-flow velocity in the conduit should be two or more times
the largest capacity is generally the one used to back-wash the filters
in the treatment plant, and therefore its usetulness is sometimes ex~
auch cases, the flushing water is drawn from the clear well of the treat-
ment plant; hence, the assignment of auch a dual role to the back-wash
pump frequently involves problems of reserve storage, pump efficiency
question.
be required and the problem of cross connection between raw and filtered
transitions in flow.
(b) Where the intake is designed with several ports, the arrange-
ment of the various inlets should insure that the debris and
because the reversed flow must run counter to the natural current.
and attention to the design of the intake ports, will often readily
solve the maintenance problem. The point stressed here is simply that
wishful hindsight.
rounding the installation concerned. Seldom are all four equally im-
portant, and qui te frequently one factor predominates and governs the
design.
so far.
66
CHAPTER III
the intakes therefrom, none are probably more important or more easily
foreseen than the formation of ice and the occurence of flOods.. Where
is no less severe than the change which they produce in the hydrological
character of the supplying source. Indeed, it may be said that these two
SECTION I - ICE
Its Importance.
Water Works Association, Mr. Norman McDonald (*3) summarizes the opinion
ii) FRAZIL ICE - a name coined from the French Canadian term for the
Provided that the intake is positioned away from areas where ice
jams are liable to fill the water to considerable depth, and that the
On this matter, the explicit view of Mr. McDonald, quoted earlier, finds
conforming opinion on all sides and to such an extent that much of the
performance.
Many authors, including Fair and Geyer, Turneaure and Russell, Babbitt
and Doland, would appear to hold anchor ice as well as frazil ice to be
warrant the generalization inferred by the texts, the fact remains that,
of the two, frazil ice is the more dangerous. Recalling to mind that the
conditions; that even when these conditions are met, its existence is of
short duration, it hardly seems likely that anchor ice would be primarily
findings in a number of instances (*8, *29) where severe ice problems have
69
been investigated. In these cases, the weight of evidence clearly im-
plicates frazil ice as the main offender whereas anchor ice appears for
have been overcome as well. This is the approach adopted in the follow-
Frazil lee and the Scope of the Problem. Before discussing the alterna-
tive measures that can be invoked against frazil ice, it would seem
character. Frazil ice has been defined as a surface ice which is pre-
is indeed true, and little frazil ice is encountered beneath sheet ice
important since ice is only slightly lighter than water and it requires
is broken into small pieces. Where frazil ice is borne beneath sheet
ditions, frazil ice will rise and attach itself to the sheet greatly
depending on the manner of its formation. Thus Baylis and Gerstein (*8),
shape alone and other criteria must be used. Such a prominent character-
istic is not difficult to find for all observers agree on the tenacity
with which this form of ice will adhere to metallic abjects, and many
from a very small temperature imbalance between the ice and the metal
the process involved has been described by Messrs. Stevens and Davis
specifically states:
The foregoing remarks and the excerps quoted are little more
here.
Consequently,
has ports that are only five feet below the minimum water
structure.
must be applied.
ing table, which lists the intake velocity and port submergence for
apparent:
turbulence, size of intake and the thickness of the. sheet ice cover
may well produce some apparent contradictions. For example, the in-
nearly 45 feet.
section for the ports, and were a circular shape maintained, a re-
where the ports are set in a vertical plane and kept bell-mouth in
are often designed in oval or rectangular form with the long axis
shape but made to face upwards, the rim of the port being set flush
with the top of the crib, and the connection between intake and con-
distance above the inlet (*3, *14, *24). When this plate
77
ii) Tower Intakes and Exposed Cribs. The external force ex-
iii) Shore Intakes. The effect of ice thrust against the shore-
ancountered.
78
of specifie information.
would appear that few large intakes on this continent have been in-
Page 79.
since intake and conduit are preferably constructed at the same time,
the use of dredges and divers would impose hazardous if not im-
cluded that the installation of large intakes far from shore is not
On the other hand, in the case of small crib intakes and some
caused the warmer water from the bottom to rise with the
even wh ere th e ·
a~r t emperat ure was well below 0°F.
current.
g • 1000.Q.T
=
Wbere Q water conauaption, cubic metres/ hour.
T = temperature increment, degrees C • 0.040C.
and the corresponding Mechanical Power (M) • m- kil&watts •
Thua, a flow of 1 cu. metre/sec requires 167.4
kilowatts,Which corresponds to practical data and experiment.
84
(f) The use of more rough and ready methods such as pike-poles
general form. In short, ice does not demand any novel form of intake
but merely requires that the usual forms be adapted for operation
assumed that the fluctuations in water level of the supplying source were
under consideration.
85
the question of water depth has frequently been cited as a crucial factor.
are, in fact, free from great variations in level and therefore qualify
(d) Small Rivers, where the water level is already controlled for
intake problem.
nection with water level fluctuation are quite valid for a considerable
l a r ge and small, wher e wide varia tions in s tage a re quite common and
considera tion of paramount importance which may well govern the design of
the intake.
86
will take into account the far-reaching effect of varying water level;
and for this reason, it would appear useful to establish at the outset of
the discussion, the bread limits of the problem envisaged. To this end,
many decades.
fifteen to fifty fe e t.
With these ass umptions as a basis for dis cussion, the e ffect of
Ef fect on Position.
particularly important:
87
Instances have been reported where the channel has silted up,
the latter inoperative (St. Charles, Mo. and Council Bluffs, Iowa.).
pertinent here:
(a) Where ice problems develop concurrently with low water level,
the river or below the river bed (cf. Chapter II, Page 19,
supply.
position can be found for the intake that will meet the
in this regard:
ii) Shore intakes. Although increased in size and cost, shore in-
the inside bend be selected as the site since there is less danger
instances, the gap which may then exist between the structure
and the shore can either be filled with rock and stable material
continued above average low water mark. In this way, the major
Provided that asuitable site can be f'ound which w:iill ensure stable
commonly termed Movable Intakes, have been designed to cope with the prob-
lem of fluctuating water level. In the view of Lischer and Hartung (*1):
the following pages. In each instance, the drawing and oommentary has
clines can be formed on river bank levees that have been made stable
by riprapping or revetment work and that are near the water's edge,
fixed intakes.
pumphouses and pumps at the st.Louis County \tater Co. on the Missouri
parallels the rails on the pump incline. Planged openings into this
PLOATING PUMPS
pumps are installed upon a barge which can be moved with the ehanging
river channel. Both horizontal and vertical pumps have been used on
ing barge by laying the pipe in a dredged trench deep in the river
engines.
l'a:;e 94 •
•
/
c;.,, R.ul ftr
~.~.,,. ~~(ly,j
threaten to flood any of the pUllp and we 11 units be low the top unit,
tbe .otor of that unit ia re.oved &Dd the pump ia teaporarily abandon-
e4 to the rising river. Puaping is continued through the remaining
paapa _in the series. There is no appreciable losa of capacity into the
8Jatea upon the abandonaent of a puap or puaps inas11111ch as the in-
creaaed river stage and consequent _lower pWlping head compensate for
capacity at low river stages - that is, high heads - is by the install-
ation of a low river stage pump which becomes a standby pump or even
inoperative at high river stages, In the example aboYe, the pump pro-
the river stage approaches 36 ft, the vertical pump motor is removed and
fully applied on streama and rivers which flood. Simple shore type
intake structures are constructed and submersible pumps installed
during low water. Inasmuch as pump and motor can be completely submerged,
SIPHOO WEU
wt pit intate .tlich recei'Yes its wa.ter fr011 the river through a siphoo
JJ.ne. Tbe siphon intake line requirea air e'Yacuation to maint&in the
'Y&euaa aeceasary for proper operation. 'l'be chief advantage of the siphon
w11 la one of lower first cost aince well drilling methods can be uaed
to conatruct the wet pit. Little construction is required UDder water.
>: ·-~.:;~
Pig.18 - SUspended Pump Intake
in vertical well type, lli.xed- and axial-flow pumps malte possible the
low cost and the elimination of costly underwater construction. The pump
must be protected from drift and navigation and for this purpose it may be
pages; namely,
normally dry periods may prevent the water level from falling
Effect on Maintenance.
that variable stage almost inevitably increases the scope and cost of
wo
maintenance operations. These three problems alone have far-reaching
cleaning problem.
(*1):
CHAP'l'ER IV
Forevord.
more common forma of vater intakes to which reference has been made
·~
h.cc 10~.
_ L_ · - · ···
··~,
··-r
_:~f
Fig. 20 {.\) - :~
rnta':e Crib icsiyner1 f nr use in a bay.
( .\.W.'i' •.\. Journl.l, Vol.32- .\:,ril 104ù.)
'r.lis subner,;e·'l crih intal;c is clescribeJ by McDonald (*3)
in the f ollowing way,
" In la!~es the cr~ · ) usual 1Y con tain~ an inlet consi~tin:; of
an elbow and bellfllottth f :tcinc up\'Jar:!s an··! over t 11i:::. i.:-; ;_)lace:! a steel or
con crete covcr plate b,1 f o.rn :1. square or cyl i nrlric:tl in let L'f l:l.r ~ ~ arca
and consequcntly low vclocity."
- --
~r
~
~--· -
=t:-
· .. -• - ·-
--
CHAPTER V
General Scope.
of raw-water entering the ports has been discussed at some length, and
throughout most of the discussion the term "position" has designated the
channels and bed of the river or lake concerned. So defined, the ideal
position for an intake has been established as that which, among other con-
the turbidi ty of the water immediately adjacent to the intake. While this
the ports is still turbid and the question arises whether or not a further
reduction can be effected before entry of the water into the conduit. Un-
mouth port, already amply discussed, is a partial solution - but what about
the position of the mouth i tself in relation to the direction of the approach-
this thesis as well as the subject of the following report and discussion.
107
Terms of Reference.
the report thereon, a brief discussion of the terms of reference and of the
and Russell* report the following values for the average amount of sediment
Burdick* reports that the inshore turbidity of the Great Lakes under
ever the variations, the treated water delivered to the consumer must not
conform to the accepted standard of the United States Public Health Service.
The term "silica scale" means that the standards of comparison for turbidity
are mixtures of silica and clear water of known concentration. Thus, the
which exista, but rather the amount that can be removed before entry into
the supply system when full advantage is taken of the action of subsidence.
In other words, what is the nature of the material which can be removed by
accepted as an absolute basis for the design of such basins. In this con-
tion basins; hence, settling velocities alone are a weak tool in predicting
the size of partiales that can be removed, and other approaches that will
must be considered. In this connection, the known values for the currents
Sewerage Commission:-
110
General Assumptions.
the desirable values for approach and port velocity discussed in earlier
an intake; namely,
bed-load.
c. Intake ports with velocities ranging from 0.50 to 0.25 fps will
probably not entrain coarse sand, and at even lower values may
d. The removal of all fine sand by simply reducing approach and port
which a simple intake vith flared mouth could be placed in a flowing stream.
designated by "V", the port velocity by "v", and the velocity through the
Specifie Assumptions.
Some of the particles borne along by the main stream would appear
direction.
B. Intake Port Facing Straight Out.
In contrast to the conditions prevailing with the intake port
facing upstream, the straight out position is at right angles to
be less vith the port in this position than with the port facing
upstream.
112.
._~~~~~~~~
v0 = inta.!:c veloci ty •
t
Yo
(a.) r:a.c i n <; Cp;: t re ·tr..
V _---~
f
v.;
(b) Pn.cinç D o \:n s tr c ~m .
'Yo
~
(c) racin: Strai;;ht uut.
113
c. Intake Port Facing Downstream.
Whereas the straight out position for the intake port com-
pelled partiales to undergo a change in direction of ninety
degrees before entry, the downstream position for the port mouth
The Hypothesis.
effected is lesa than that obtained when the port is faced straight
114
out at right angles to the ourrent& when faced straight out, re-
duction is again less than that which resulta from facing the port
downstream.
that a relationship between intake position and turbidity could exist for
theory.
would indicate that auch assumptions are far from identical vith aetual
between theory and fact are large, it must be aoknowledged and foreseen
Secondarily,
Limits of Investigation.
Practical considerations, founded either in the theory relating to
intake operation or in the wise usage of laboratory equipment, made it
Intake Position - Three positions for the mouth of the intake were
Approach Veloeities -"V"- were limited to the range from 1.0 - 5.0
ft./sec. which may be considered representative of conditions exist-
be of significant weight.
however, the pump available in this instance was not designed for
at that time.
118.
CHAPTER VI
Apparatus.
additional elements which were designed and fabricated for this particular
capacity of 10 cfs.
a connecting line.
desirable capacity and into which the effluent from the over-
the test flume and receive any spillage therefrom during the
Control
-- -
... __.,._"""' ..
~ ~ .·.~·
Gate
1 r-
I Mixing
lntake pipe Valve
1 Basin
1 1 Overflow ~ei Assemblv
va:irb~
1 1
~
\...../
Head
weighing Assemblv
-L_
- -T
Gate Reservoir
Weighing Valve
Tank
-....._d
1-'
[\.)
0
121
items is given below devoid of any explanation for the form and dimensions
in the laboratory by the writer (cf. Plate I - Page 118, and Plate
IV - Page 126).
two pipes were identical in every respect except that one provided
whereas the other was entirely straight (cf. Plate II - Page 122).
delivery line. The plywood was fastened on 2" by 4" studs, the
two bulkheads wedged against the aides of the steel flume and the
joints caulked with plasticine and oakum. The bulkheads were braced
122.
by 2" by 4" struts placed between them and drawn up tight against
these by six 1/4" steel reinforeing rods with threaded ends whieh
passed through each bulkhead and were bolted on the outside of the
supporting studs. This work was done by the writer with the
entia! head between this deviee and the flume should exist and the
tube of 3" diameter was buil t wi thin an outer circular shell of 6"
diameter in such a way that water entering the intake would flow
along a flexible plastic bose, pass through a funnel and into the
inner tube. The water would then rise up the tube, spill over the
ed~ and fall into the lower encircling container from which it was
ing tank over a known period of time served to establish the dis-
charge through the intake. This entire deviee - the overflow weir -
vertically between gui de rails; bence, the head on the weir was
variable and the discha rge thereof adjustabl e. The overflow weir
124.
128).
IV - Page 126).
Procedure.
matie sketch on Page 120, the slope of the flume was varied to produce the
different velocities of flow investigated; namely, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and
5.0 ft./sec. Meanwhile, the discharge of the pump was also adjusted to
At each of these flume veloci ties (denoted by "V") the intake pipe
positions, for any given value of "V", the intake velocity (denoted by
"v0 ") was adjusted through a range from 1.0 - 5.0 ft./sec. by raising
or lowering the overflow weir. In summary then, there were five flume
velocities at each of which there were three intake positions, and for
water were taken, two from the intake weir and one from the flume. The
flume sample was interposed between the two weir samples in order to be
already described. The meter was introduced into the flume at a point
just upstream from the intake position and observations carried out over
lized. The meter was then removed and the intake pipe positioned in the
flowing current.
128.
and observing the time required to fill this container. When the fill-
into the weighing tank and allowed to accumulate for about 5 minutes
using the known dimensions of the intake pipe, and a calibration curve
prepared relating these two quantities (cf. Appendix B). It was there-
mixing reservoir. Two particle sizes, 47 and 149 microns, were combined
in equal proportions by weight to provide a turbidity between 500 - 1000
ppm.
Determination of Turbidity. As each set of samples was collected, it
was removed from the test area by Mr. Wellington Chen, the writer's assis-
tant, who carried out most of the sample weighings. Each sample bottle
had been weighed empty and carefully marked in advance with an identifying
number. Each sample in the set was then weighed before and after evapor-
ation of the water content, and the amount of water as well as sediment
130.
Observations.
been used:
Variation in turbidity between flume water and the water passing into
t - T • 100
T
which therefore expresses the difference in the turbidities of intake and
velocity concerned and only the reduced observations, rather than the com-
plete weighing reports, are tabulated. Samples of the actual observation
forms are included towards the end of the present chapter together with
immediately.
13J
Observations August 6th, 1957
Flume Ve1ocity "V" = 1.0 tt./sec.
Nominal Intake Actual Flume Intake t Mean t - T • lOO
T
Vo Q vo T 2 samples t
ft./sec. lbs/min. ft./sec. ppm. ppm. ppm. %
"Upstream Position"
1.0 9.4 0.99 411 564-547 555 + 38
2.0 19.3 2.00 354 396-425 410 + 16
well as those vhich are recorded on the folloving pages for the other
the . .Ill of MIIP11Dc) wat•r vith a h1Pel' turb141lJ \bu tha' vbiah
\be . . .pli.Dg prooeëre \o cope vUh aaoh a oon41Uon 'bJ euuriq \bat
the - - "a\ona" W11 ~led bo\b at the 1'1- aDd &\ \ba Oftl'-tlOV ......
1\artherMre, ...pue the preoauUoaa \&ken 1D. \he &taip of lbl cwer-
It was becoming quite clear that unless the variations in turbidity due
This would require maintaining the intake velocity and the intake position
2.0 ft./sec. and a "straight out" position for the · intake during the
tion runa" as they were termed for convenience, were conducted over a
period of one hour during which two flume samples, one upstream and one
downstream, as well as one intake sample were taken every ten minutes.
The resulte recorded for these additional tests are included among the
In the above it may be assumed that the average T&lues of flume and
t - T
a a • 100 = 532 - 557 • 100 _ 5~
Ta 557 =
In the test itself, single observations showed a variation from + 36%
might not be representative of the water sample taken from the flume.
r;-:2
E = 0.6745J~
t - T • lOO 2
T ...L. -L-
+ 12 - 17 289
-11 + 6 36
- 5 0 0 Whence,
+ 36 - 41 1681
E
+
= - 0.6745 ~ 2~93
+ 9 81
E = :!: 15%
- 14
- 23 + 18 324
of the variation in turbidity between intake and f1ume water for the
present flume velocity (V= 1.0 ft./sec.) and with a constant intake
probable error.
have been made at all flume velocities and the results have been pre-
"Upstream Position"
t - T
a a • lOO =
Ta
"Upstream Position"
1.0 9.80 0.90 764 684 - 715 700 - 9
2.0 21.0 2.18 680 720 - 697 709 + 4
"Downstream Position"
1.0 9.6 1.00 742 640 - 565 602 - 19
1.0* 10.0 1.05 428 377 - 366 371 - 13
2.0 20.0 2.08 547 612 - 664 638 + 16
t - T
a a • 100 = + 2%
Ta
"Upstream Position"
"Downstream Position"
t - T
a a • 100 = - 'JI,
Ta
"Upstream Position"
1.0 10.3 1.06 950 848 - 778 813 - 4
2.0 20.2 2.10 932 963 - 948 906 - 3
3.0 29.1 3.02 853 1030 - 987 1008 + 18
t a - Ta
T
• 100 = - ~
a
7 - 51 15 1 Flume
1.0 - 0.99 Upstream 2 lntake
7 - 56 62 3 lntake
8 - 16 159 4 Flume
2.0 - 2.00
8 - 23
Upstream 5
6
lntake
Intake
275
8 - 45 526 7 F1ume
4.0 - 3.75
8 - 50 706
Upstream 8
9
lntake
Intake
9 - 05 815 10 c Flume
3.0 - 2.95
9 - 11 984
Upstream 11
12
Intake
lntake
9 - 15 984 13 F1ume
5.0 - 5.10
9 - 19 1184
Upstream 14
15
Intake
lntake
Note.
CHAPTER VII
"The Experimental Conclusions"
1.!
,.
r-j
!_ t· ' : 1 T .
·-:-r---·
i 1 : 1-
·-·i
1
~ -0- -,_-- '=~
1
! ,- r= '-Fr-j ~ ~ q ,-r!-,.:r.- T+~: ~ ~-: c+ ~ ;.; !- r;· : ~ r
I- 1 1
r- -~~ ~ !; 1 i :
i- j + ~-- T. · :___ - · r ., 1
~t ·-
1 - - 1 1 •· j1 -, t' j · 1 ,-- - t- · ·· 1 :
J-."i -:-L
1-HH-f"H-.Jo't-1--
l'- - 1 - -- 1
1 -f- -·
r -· - 1
1
1 • 1 '
• 1 . 1 1
11 1
• 11 1
1
.' 1 ,- i.' - -·-
1
r_u_·- ; - , i ·· 1.t - .1 ..;....~
•--~rL-,- 1 • ï '
r-r .1l • i.,
~-· 1 1'' 1 ! 1 ij l'Il , 1',
'~;:t
~ i1·-[=j 11.r--9 1
't'· l:' ·i. ·1 i, i 1' : i1 ~.:-~11 1[-I~LIIj '· -11
1! ~ 1 1
--!i- +1-~riF:+f-
1
~ i ft i_~j! 1-
-!- 4-Li .,. 1 1 . - . . t .
~
H-H. .~u
.!,,.
- . . -i . jl
·r--t r 1 - : ,:Ir ~ :
. -~ f' -lt · j-t_, 1-,
-~ 1
1
-~ --Il- - -T!l·-
j
1 h· ~-li 1·-t·
. .
·
-~ !,,
1
'
1
1
1
,
1
;
; 1
- - 1 t f- -r'-, ~---
~- -: :·
·
Ï 1 1 1
1 1
t ' 1 '! i
' :
Î
1 1- -t r-- 1_~
hi
1
1
1 1 ·-
i
r
j \- 1 :
1
- • ,
- 1- . •
-- -"l'ii;
f - ---- - 1- -- T~ i nTl ~-r
-t
1
; 1 ,-, ï f
- .1.- L
·r
::n~-t::-ft=.~
·t1-l: 1l - --~ -~-l 1 ~- f-t 1r ·+r+ --H ·-+·-Ill
; 1 'j 1 l, · 1:: n:
1 Ht -~H- -~-
~
~: J ; j ~ j -~- -l -;- r ~ L; ~ [--~~~;=_! r~! -tt~_-:_ r· ;_~-111!1.., - .- ;..~~ j--r- tt---ttri-1.Î
- -t 1 i 1 1 - _., , j-I : i i 1 1 r : . r
r- - L"''~ -:-r·-~-~~-:--+- - r-I
1 • ~ 1-:--:-1-l+- 'Il_i : -~- 1
r . '.
1 t'
r-f-
i rn · -;.~ ---rt-ï: ; . ::i-i;·: ~F;-:--~ · - -:-I~f~!'
t -t-~--r-- - r- T 1-
r-l=-(-=Fr- ~+± l-~+-p-,l~---+·-rr 1
~~ tl~-=-
1..:.
1
' jf·-L
~ -1+1·-
--
.. n
1"'~ · 1•:;!
~-'-- ' ' . ' ' .
i_
: ~- - ! -f+-f- 1 -l-l-1--'~
r-~·-·-t·i·j HT
~1'1 .: ! ; 1 : : : i ~ - ~: ~: -R~~I -T
1
1
r-:- -~ -
~ c :-~-- [f
-~~t-,_h·--~-"-._r-tt::-'+
1
1 1 .
1
-w 1
1-'
;
1
_ __ -~--
b- -i i
-:. 1 --:' _j -
! 14 f· 1 1- - . -
t · · ! 1 1 1 1
1- - 1 1 1 -·- ·-- - 1- r r-
j --tt i -•j-l~- - : ·~-'-L·- _[ !-;! : i;! i- t 1; +f~t 11--: _i-·-Ef-_ -~~
-
, - - -
-- 1
-
!lH·i--
'l i~i 1 -
1 1
~--r- -~-r--
1
i+ ~ 1j· li·j-
l . - 1 1:; 1·r
i 1- h r
l-i r--t-r--rr
1 ri 1- ~-
· ~- -~~4--F~-
1 j- r-
-
- -1 - - - -·--
- i-L ! ,-r ! 1 1t !-+-- - + 1 1 1 ~--! 1
-t 'F 1
-- +-- - 1J-t _,__ : --- - ~-
.- ,..-t~ rj' ii-~ ·j' - . t ~+r- - 1- ~· '1--r- ~ r -1- -l,_
f --
. := -ff
'f- .-
-
- - - -
--1--1- --i -~ 1 - r- --
·- - - - · 1-' +- -- - r -'--'r-·H-.----1-t
Î f-- -rrr
1-- i l . 1· t - . - - -1- - ~- -i ! - -- .±.-
'·
. 1- .. f--t-1--+-
l_j-~
i_j_j__; -11 -
.: 1 T~ -' l' ~ ~~ -- -- --- .- - t-- t- ~ -- - t-- - H --f-H:-t:-1-H-+-t-H·-t-t++++
r-
r- - - - -l -
I-
1- . -- -
1'1.
f- -- l'
H-+-+--H-t-++-t,~H-1. •-_ r . ~-.l·t·,l -~~- ~~f . -.~ -~ --~~~;: _+ 1-+·+- +t r-t t t+~~+ -+-1
-+++ ~-1-1 ·1-+--+H-;----+
+ __ Hr-
- 1- - r- --- ~- 1· r · j-~ 11 ,. --,-r- i- 1- t-r-H-+-+-t--1- •
155
The importance of the relationship between these two quan-
tities lies in the fact that the value of the probable error at
in a range from - 15% to + 15% for the most part and the range
flume water are not variations at all but merely the result of
absolute verdict.
head over the intake resulted. What effect, if any, did this
HIIJ)l1J!IB oon41 tiou" - in Ol'der t_p 1Je )oth ftltd aa4 plau1ltle.
atteot the tvb1di 'J' ot wa\er entef'i.Dc • leut•. t'be ftl'iûle ia ••~
tore iatùe poaitie ut, tor the .-nt, the etteot of intake wlooit;r
arraDCM vith 'hia 14ea 1n 111Dd, i.Mn, 'tW" aD1 li'ftD. n- ftlooit,, ta
ftlue• ahow UDder 'hl rnpect1w bu41Na •t "Up•tnu", "hwi'r.a"•
aD4 "Straiaht Ou.t" oa11 be adèled. tos•.'her M.c.ebraiaall;r uc a • • ftl'M
e:rtrao\N tor eaoh ot the thrM poe1Uona.. Bach 8PD 10 • •,..... vi1l be
tbe reault ot aoabini.Dg not lep thU .fift, uèl •r• ot'teD.IP OJ' •SCb'
i.Jid1Yi4.t ftl.uea. In extracUnc *be . . . . . . tbrH lùl-~ Y&l.MI
po~al.J exoeede4. the JU4D1 of the ether ftl•• 1I)' unral UM• ~· prebable
OI'I'OI' 1Moln4. Vhere 'he•• ftl.Ma •coeur oa 'b• tollovins pqe•, tbof
are olearl;r indioated (•).
157
Below, the values previous1y tabulated on Page 147 for a f1ume ve1-
ooity of 4.0 ft./sec. have been rearranged on the basis described above.
- 19 - 39* - 17
- 1 + 7 + 10
- 11 - 11 - 8
+ 1 + 10 - 6
+ 12 - 20 + 4
+ 5 - 4 - 2
.... •••• - 3
to intake position have been carried out for the other flume ve1ocities.
1.0 - 2* 0 + 11 (x)
2.0 0 3 0
3.0 - 2 1 + 1
4.0 - 2 4* - 3
5.0 - 2* 1 - 1
158
of 1.0 ft./sec., would greatly augment probable error. Means that have
little significance here since only three values out of nearly one
Conclusions.
averaged over the whole range of flume velocities, the mean values thus
the present type, then auch application would be on the basis of the
ratio between intake and flume velocities, or, using the symbols already
employed,
___ T • 100
t -l'...;;. .. f Eosition, v: J
Consequently, if for any given intake position the values of T •
t - T
vo
100 be obtained for varying values of V , it should be possible to test
servations would be
E
E =
m
error in the mean value will be again about ! 4%. This is the
peated for the other positions. Final tabulations for these other
t - T • 100
Actual Nominal Mean t - T • 100
T T
Ratio Ratio
vo vo
v (%) v (%)
0.20 - 15
0.23 - 17 0.20 - 16
0.33 0
0.34 + 17 0.33 + 8
0.42 + 6 0.42 + 6
0.47 + 10
0.51 - 23 0.50 - 5
0.52 - 2
0.66
0.62
-+ 2
6 0.62 0
0.62 - 4
0.79 - 8
0.79
0.81
- 6
+ 2
o.8o - 4
0.96 - 1
0.99 + 7
0.99 + 13 1.00 + 1
1.00
1.01
-
+ 4
1
1.02 - 16
1.03 + 1
pages.
164
vo
Turbidity Variations Corresponding to Values of the Ratio V
("Upstream" Position)
0.20 - 4 0.20 - 4
0.30 - 9
0.28 - 19 0.30 - 14
0.43 - 3 0.43 - 3
0.51 + 8
0.56
0.52
-- 6
1
0.53 0
0.73 + 4
0.75 -11 0.75 - 3
0.83 + 1
0.81 - 2 0.82 0
0.98 + 12
0.99 + 38
1.09 - 9 1.00 + 8
0.91 + 4
1.03 - 3
0.21 - 13
0.25 - 39* 0.2 - 13
0.33 - 19
0.35 - 13 0.34 - 16
0.43 + 4 0.43 + 4
0.53 + 7
0.52
0.55
- 20
+ 1
0.53 - 4
0.63 - 1 0.63 - 1
0.67 0
0.69 + 16 0.68 + 8
0.79 + 2
0.79
0.83
- 5
- 11
0.80 - 5
1.00 + 1
0.98 + 2
1.01 + 10
1.04 +n
1.02 + 2 1.00 + 2
1.13 + 2
1.02 - 19
0.95 +11
requires that the curve be fitted by using some precise and analytical
approach such as the method of least squares. For reasons which will
become apparent a little later on, the relationship between the two
Vo
quantities t - T • lOO
T
(%) and ïf will be assumed as linear in the
present instance.
This me thod is based upon the law of chance or random sampling and
a + bx - y •
n n
and ~ are to be chosen in such a way that the sums of the squares of the
2 2
R = 1: [<a + bx) - y] = a minimum.
2
To meet this requirement, the first derivatives of ER with respect
d(tR 2 )
db 21:[a*] = 21: (a+ bx- y) • x = 0
167
For n pairs of observed values, the following simultaneous equations exist:
I - na + bEx - Ey = 0
2
II - aEx + bEx - Exy = 0
bi:x fz. • 0
I-a+--
n n
II - ~ + bi:x2 - f!l. • 0
n n n
Thus we have two equations and two unknowns; whence, the values of
a and b are determined.
used as an example, and the linear equation relating t -l' T • 100 ( "y" )
Vo
and V ("x") obtained.
I a + 0.55 b + 1.42 • 0
II 0.55 a + 0.37 b + 0.39 = 0
a = - 4.67
b = + 5.91
is undoubtedly a minimum.
ing the line of best fit through the plotted observations for the
on following pages.
169.
L ! .. ,
1 1 1
1-r,--. !
. ! ,- .-1
! : 1 ; ~: QtJ1;
! 1 ,.,
+
1
1
i: : ;. ; 4~6fl ~
- - -~-
170
a = - 13.56 and
b ... + 19.45
y = - 13.56 + 19.45 x
171 • .
~
1
'
'
1 :
·L!_:·. ·:
1
'
1 1
•
.1 •• ,
i '
l'
' 'i
:
1 1
1
1
1: 1' i- - ~ · · ·
•
l !
H-·f
j r-i ! ii l'
1 ;
1
1
, , ';;! r ·-
,
1
! ~ +±-!
-~ • ~ !1' --- - -' _ i -HI-IH~
!-t- i
-+
P.=H= -·, :-. _·-_ ,:
~ -=r=--,-r·- ' "
rl--i--H-rr· · ·-
t· ·
r1 ', 1 r
i.
1
1 1
't
;
r
1 ' 1
1;
!• ' 1 1-t.
· ~- i
j 1l ; -
1
l1
·
1 1
1,- ·-ï
': -· •
L - , --+-
1
1·· -1 :-
g i·r:l -1-· ,i r,-J-,·
! , • • t t 1 , · 1
1-:-+--rti···-Ï! -- 1 ÏÏ··' - !1 1 i 1 i~ 1 \ ! li'- ~- · 1;- · ,ïr 1--+-++-t-+-H --H
~
- ,_ 1- - - - _,.. r- -i-+-'--,-,-~
-· - . . - . , 1 ' l l-+-t--r- H-+---+-+---+-+-1
J
1
t-- r-h...LLL
1 ~ t\ t
-• _:.....:....l.._L~
1 --,r-; --- ~ ~-
· · · · · · · · ; 1 • ; ·t
~.
1
1 •
'
,
1
' 1 ;
1
t
1 ••
:1 ~ 1' : i
• 1
~-~-l--, + ~r.
f---- ,+1
-rl,-:
- !-- r ..,
t:-i-
i --· • .
• T_,
1
1-
,.
tlL~ fTt
1
r' r 1 ., .1 '·
~-~ -1 -· ' --
- t-· r ,_ 1-1
1
• , .
•
' 1
, •
1 '
1
1
1
1 :
'
1
· · : 1
~~- • ;
1"' i i
1 · 1 1 1
1
r 1 1
1 , 1 '1
,
1 ,,
• •
1
•
1
•
1 :
ï
;
~~ - - f - 1 t .
'
1
1
1
li F--,wr-
-- 1 1
' T;
Il '
ï - 1- · . ·
1
'
1 1 ! ,-- ·- - +t
··1 · ! ~
j _j •
i t-+ --+--+-+-+++++
-
--
1---+-++ ++-+-+-t-
:--1-f---H l-~ r -rr' ·,'' f- . 1, - 1- ·r 1 1 , r--- '- 1 -l~ H--l --1-+-+-++-+-+-t- t--t -
i !~'~ 1 ; 1 ! 1 -~-- i; :e 1 . -~~}li ~~- 1 :-it ~-- ~0 -
f- 1
1- - ~ I~' Tj-: -!±~ï-+~t ri
:t-= -,.T -~-·1 +-:-1--J--~- li 1r 1 T 1 l 1 .. ~-~--- ' : : J l-- 1 +-H-++-t-+-H
t ~-:·rt~ i-i tT· --j-: 'r FI:·-~;', 11 , 1 _ , - ~ - , r~1 ···~ ·_:_ïJ T
1 .:
-
1
'1 '- rt- 1
-.
t- î T , f- t·1+ - -1- -
- l_r_
1 -' ·t11-+ ï- -! t 1 .- 1 · ; i 1 1 t i 1 · f
-- ! !-- l · r i : 1. 1111! 1
11 · 1 1l -
1 i- i ·h 1 •
- ~~- t- H
-" - -+--+-+-~---+--+-+-+++
; 1 --
1
_--Lf
--r -_cv~ -
1
----~ii
+ -1 r· 1
1,:-:: - ~": ,,:,:'!:
,- 1- r- 1 - •. '" , 1 1
,~'- 1!J't--
..
-~~. --~=--r--~
_E ~-
~ :- --t-t-1
~ -t-t-t-H-+---t--t
.± Î
1 ~-. - - - : ,- --: ; ,, i ; i 1 1 1 ' 1 1 - ~
-- -+-+-+-+-++-!
1 ' : 1
~ -~T ~ - -~-- r i F'j-1; ~H · -i i 1::: ! i '· -~ 1 ~ --~ 1 - 1 R~t-=-t:-: :t-
1 1 '
f- _ ,_ _-1-1-+-t-+-
:j. -:--
i l' '
r- ·1- - t--- ,- · 1 r --- ~ : 1· 11 · 1' 1
1
: 1 --f- ~ 1 -- i- t· -t-t--HH·--++-H
- -
-- 11
- -
·-
-
r-
t-
1--i-
1 irH-;
1 1 1- ·-
! '1"' 1 -, :· ' ii· i ' .
1 1 1 ~~ --
1 t- -
--1----
1
1 r-
' -·-1 rt - 1- j-·f---+-f---H---1
...,---- - f----1-'t-·H~
~ :-i rt·-'-[~--~ 1
lj 1
l r-·1·- il t· t- -r---t- t--++-++-1-
-~-1~- ;-,-FI=f:-
ï ï ·1
~ ~ !.:~1.?j~~-~-~--
-t-+r-t-t~~-=: -_+f---++-1
!
f ! rr fJi f[ . !
_ _ _ 1 1
rtf
1
1
++--++-t--t-
l ! 1 1 l r j -j
- ~~ - ~: r H-r-f ~-1 rl-- 1-
r
---8
---1- --- - r·:--: ~-ï=-r~ --n-rr 1 L~- -FF-t-r-t--t-1H-~-t:=t~-+-+
-- -+-1
1
1 -_ - -+ r 1 - --
a = -15.42 and
b = +21.2
y = - 15.42 + 21.2 x
'
1
1
1
1
1 1
L -,1
1
'
175
Conclusions.
A summary examination of the individual graphs for all three positions
as the curve of best fit. To have done otherwise would have required a
more definite pattern in the plot and many more points therein; moreover,
it must be recalled that even the present curves are subject to a probable
ent graphs are nonetheless suft.icient for the present purposes and may
be determined as follows:
point "n" on the eombined Graphs; therefore "O - n" is the range
age value of over this range is the value at the point "N" =
0.35 or one-half the value at the point "n". Drawing the line
lines at the points "S" and "Q" respeoti vely, the values for
graph as:
positions, using the points "m", "M", "P" and "R", shows the
Average Reductions in Turbidity to be the following:
Average Reduction in Turbidity {Upstream)
connection with the first objective and permits the two sets of
Summary of Conclusions.
the ratio between the intake velocity and the velocity of the
positioning of the intake is about three times more than that pro-
178
duced where the intake is placed straight out and at ninety
Importance of Conclusions.
. ,_ . _. ,., e~r
for example,
In effect, the intake becomes part of the water treatment plant and, b,y
proper design, offers the prospect of improved water quality at less cost
to the consumer.
179
Future Investigations.
The resulta of the present experiment and the conditions which
which has shown itself to be unwise - the writer intends to confine his
suggestion.
2. Discharge through the flume or equivalent deviee must be
about 7.5 cfs. would have been the minimum requirement to obtain
known.
3. Future investigators would do well to consider the use of
observations.
intake port.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PART 1
PART 2
Bibliograpby
PART 2 (cont'd)
9. REH, American Society of Civil Engineers, Proceedings 83, No. 1465
"Intakes".
10. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, Transactions 75, P. 643.
"Hydraulic Problems Encountered in Intake Structures".
11. ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD, Vol. 157, No. 25, December 20th 1956.
"Near Detroit Clean Water is Where You Find It".
12. ENGINEERING & CONTRACT RECORD, Vol. 68, No. 7, July 1955.
"Beamsville Waterworks Project".
13. ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD, Vol. 155, No. 22, December 1955.
"Cleveland, Ohio, Taps Ie.ke Erie Again".
14. MUNICIPAL UTILITIES MAGAZINE, Vol. 92, No. 10, October 1954.
"City of Regina Acquires New Water Supply from Buffalo Pond".
15. WATER & SEWAGE WORKS, Vol. 101, No. 3, March 1951.
"New Type River Intake ••• Perforated Concrete Pipe".
16. ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD, Vol. 151, No. 45, November 1953.
"River Intake for Industrial Water Supply to Tap Flood
Flows Only."
17. ENGINEERING & MINING JOURNAL, Vol. 154, P. 84.
"White Pine' s Water Intake".
18. GRANACHER, Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, August 1953.
"Water lntake for Steel Company Built to Withstand
Monogohela River Floods".
19. HOLTON, Water & Sewage Works, Vol. 101, June 1954.
"Water lntake Cribe is Lonely Island".
20. RODEMEYER, Power Engineering, Vol. 57, February 1953.
"New Boom Intake •• Will it Cut Screening Costs?".
Bibliography
PART 2 (cont'd)
24. WATER & SEWAGE, Vol. 83, No. 9, September 1945.
"Kingston Filter Plant and Intake".
26. GLAZBROOK, Engineering News Record, Vol. 131, No. 23, December 1943.
"Cantilever Bridge Buil t to Support Pumps and Intake of
Water Supply System".
PART 3
33. SHERMAN, Engineering News Record, September 1930.
"River and Lake Supplies".
Bibliography
PART 3 (cont'd)
35. HOWARD, Engineering & Contract Record, Vol. 61, No. 10,
October 1948.
"liater Supply in Canada During Past 60 Years~
37. ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD, Vol. 156, No. 50, April 12, 1956.
"Extended Intake Improves City's liater".
38. MUNICIPAL UTILITIES MAGAZINE, Vol. 95, No. 1., January 1957.
"Statistics of Canadian Waterworks Systems by Provinces".
REFERENCE TEXTBOOKS
Foreword.
the turbidity content of naturally flowing waters, not vith the laws
governing the flow itself. The interest here is in turbidity and not in
hydraulics; nevertheless, it is quite evident that the two considerations
sharp focus and still obtain a measure of brevity and completeness for
little explanation is given for the dimensions of the elements used and
only passing reference is made to their hydraulic performance. Discussion
on all of these matters, deliberately held over until now, constitutes the
namely,
and investigation.
- 1-
Part III - Report on the Performance of some elements of the
Experimental Apparatus.
- ii -
Test Flume. Proposed flume velocities were from 1.0 - 5.0 ft./sec.
The high flume discharge contemplated made it desirable to locate
the flume at a point where the effluent could be discharged directly
Some leakage and spillage from the flume had to be expected and pro-
and being made of steel plate was aufficiently strong to carry the
Since the exact discharge from the flume was not of primary
- iii -
the intake position and with the rotating buckets of the meter
placed at the same elevation as the intake port. In order not to
interfere with the flow pattern adjacent to the intake, the current
intake.
of time. With the diameter of the intake pipe known, the relation-
- iv -
of the water content vould require a standard evaporating oven
ensure that the samples vould contain from 35-40 c.e. of vater and yet
be handled without excessive danger of spilling. Actual veighings
to 0.001 grama.
intake water would be done at the rim of a small circular veir over
Experimental Apparatus.
Elements to be designed.
With the aforementioned factors in mind, preliminary calculations
vere necessary for the design and fabrication of the following.
(a) The model intake conduit.
(b) The small circular wetr over which the intake water vould
about 1/2 inch vas choaen for the intake pipe. lt vas fitted vith
-v-
a flared end-section made from copper sheeting l/32 in. thick and
soldered to the rod. Two auch intakes vere prepared in advance
and the dimensions of each are shown on the following page (Drawing
whence,
A1 = 0.0130 sq.ft. and D1 = 1.53 inches.
These are minimum values. The actual values used in the experiment
were as follows:-
0.0180 x 0.90
0.00256 = 6 •3
and the ratio between port velocity and intake velocity is the
- vi -
Drawing "D"
~1
~
.. ,,
~ i;
' '" ~
""
~~-tt~).
~
\
~ ~l".
s '~)
~ ~
'!(
~~~~; ~"; ;
'1 '•,
~
'\ll
! v'
,,''
'
.1
-vii _
reciprocal or 0.159.
plotted for the intake relating the Discharge "Q" at the intake in
tionship was established between "Q" and the port velocity "v".
- viii -
Appendix
l ï
.
ï
1
r-
ix
Ca ibr.ation
- x -
The Overflow Weir. Water entering the intake was to be conve;red to
a circular weir over which it would fall in a free and uninterrupted
discharge thereb;y providing an ideal sampling point. It therefore
experiment was 2.6 and the largest particle had a diameter of 149
microns (~) or 0.149 m.m. According to Steel* the hydraulic sèttling
water at 10°C. (cf. Water Supply and Sewerage - 2nd Edition) and
namely,
then
that
-xi-
then if A = Area of the intake conduit = 0.002562 sq.ft.
V = Minimum velocity in conduit = 1.0 ft./sec.
v1 = Minimum velocity in up-flow • 0.0525 ft./sec.
A1 = Area of circular weir in sq. ft.
0.002562 x 1.0
0.0525 • 0.049 sq. ft.
The Flume. Due to the length of the experiment, the pump could be
per increment of depth than the rectangular shape, the fiume vas
- xii -
(b) Since the water arriving at the flume vas to flow upwards
through a mixing basin, vater influent to the fllDDe would
have little or no component of velocity in the direction
preliminary calculations.
Assuming trapezoidal flume, side-slopes 1:1 and bottom width = 1.00 ft.
-xiii -
Drawing "B"
'\
- xiv _
Plate X - Baffle placed in t-·!ixing Basin •
-xv-
1.0 ft., 8ide-slopes 1:1 and height of about 1.0 (to provide 80me
free-board),
the Friction Lo8s in such a flume flowing at 5.0 ft./8ec. and
discharging 6.5 èf'a. can be computed from the Manning Formula,
V = 5.0 ft./sec.
n = 0.010
Velocity = =
5.0 ft./sec.
V
Depth of Flow = D = 0.75 ft.
-xvi-
Critical Depth. For a trape~oidal section where
B = width of flow at water surface (ft.)
b = bottom width (ft.)
He = energy heat (ft.) as given in (3) on previous page.
Then,
5
!!
b x He = Critical Depth = D0 (4)
and for the assumed D = 0.75 ft., V = 5.0 ft./sec. and the proposed
D = 0.84 ft.
c
.],_
A = vc (5)
c
(5)'
V = 4.25 ft./sec.
c
- xvii -
Resulting Effect. From the aforegoing it is clear that the depth
of flow selected is less than the critical depth and the velocity
of flow selected greater than the critical velocity. Rapid flow
rather than tranquil flow will result; aoreover, since the flume is
small in overall dimensions, the difference between the selected
depth D (0.75 ft.) and the critieal depth D0 (0.84 ft.) is small
Then,
h a H
e - D
(6)
Furthermore, when the depth of flow is less than ctitical depth,
then D beeomes equal to D0 or the critical depth. Such is the con-
dition in the example presently being considered; bence,
In the present example,
h =
He - Dc
Since H8 = v2/2g + D (Equation 3)
- xviii -
drop should be at maximum flume velocity as in the case under dis-
cussion where V= 5.0 ft./sec. and He= 1.14 ft. (Equation 3).
Since D0 = 0.84 in the present case, then,
h = 0.30 ft., or about four inches.
idea of the flow conditions that would prevail at the other velocities
folloving table are shown the computed values for Q, He and D0 where
the value of Dis kept constant at 0.75 ft. and the velocity varied
from 1.0 ft./see. to 4.0 ft./sec., the slope of the flume being
adjusted accordingly.
-~-
the critical depth is less than the proposed depth of flow. At the
4.0 ft./seo., the proposed depth and critioal depth are very nearly
- xx -
Drawing "A"
. '
~
i
~w
-xxi -
Drawing "C"
1 :
...
'1
·.
,..
1
1
1
4:..
~·:.
1~
;-: ... 1
.~......
1
~
.,,·:- 1
'
xxii
Part III - Report on the Performance of Some Elements of the Experimental
Apparatus.
the weir - a sliding block within a guiding channel - was neither con-
fit of the wooden blook in the wooden guide channel was either too
tight or too loose and only by continua! waxing of the mating surfaces
The Flume.
- xxiii -
In general the hydraulic performance of the flume was very similar
to the forecasted behavior outlined in Part II of this Appendix largely
because the assumed depth of flow of 0.75 ft. did, in fact, prove to be
a convenient depth.
flow (D) and the energy head (He). These observations were as follows:-
s = slope of the flume (ft./ft.), using an Engineer's Level
in the case of the depth of flow at the higher flume velocities, they
- xxiv -
CHARACTBRISTICS OP TIIB PL~ IN THB PLUMB AT TIIB VARIOUS VBLOCITIBS
11'-
1
+·-·
1
Htxmp'
....• .. .
l ...-. ~ · ·- ., ,
Sketch is not to scale and diagrammatic only.
tesend
-xxv-
Flume Flow V= } ft./sec.
In brief, the flume set in a horizontal position was found to have
a velocity close to 3.0 ft./sec. and this exact velocity was obtained by
adjusting the speed of the pump motor. The flow in the flume at this
velocity was not tranquil and undulations in the water surface of about
0.15 ft. vere indicated by the piezometer adjacent to the intake which
V = 2 ft./sec.
The discharge end of the flume was then raised by 0.16 ft. and the
imately 0.75 ft. Flow at this velocity was more tranquil than before,
the undulations near the intake being reduced to 0.08 ft. on the
average.
V = 1 ft./sec.
·The discharge end of the flume was agàin raised to mak:e a total
and the variations in water surface recorded by the piezometer vere less
than 0.04 ft. The "entrance drop" at entry of the water from the mixing
basin was negligible and the depth of flow about 0.75 ft.
V = 4 ft./sec.
The inlet end of the flume was then raised to provide a total fall
obtain 0.75 ft. for the depth of flow. This proved impossible since the
undulations in water surface became too great for the free-board available
- xxvi -
and spillage occurred. The piezometer indicated fluctuations of 0.25
critical depth, were extreme. This possibility had been foreseen (cf.
Part II) and it had been hoped that the free-board allowed would have
bad also shown that to increase the depth of flow within the limita
reduce the flow depth and increase the available free-board by so doing.
The resulting flow was rapid being at a depth equal or just less than
the critical depth and although not stable, it could be contained within
the flume without spillage. The actual depth of flow under these con-
V = 5 ft./sec.
The inlet end of the flume was again raised providing a total fall
ceding case, flow was rapid and turbulent; however, the fluctuations in
depth were less pronounced and it proved possible to obtain a flow depth
- xxvii -
consequence to the experimental investigation; namely,
(a) Equal depth of flow vas not obtained at all flume velooities,
and a variation in port submergenoe of the intake resulted.
(b) Flow conditions vere not the same at all flume velocities.
1.0 0.50 ~
2.0 0.50 16%
3.0 0.50 3~
4.0 0.38 65%
5.0 0.50 4~
words, the variations in flow depth within the flume had only minor effect
upon the constancy of the intake velocity however greatly they may have
affected the flow patterns at the intake port. Unfortunately, much of the
a ti on.
- xxviii -