Some people’s assumptions are largely irrational, guiding them to act and react in ways
that are inappropriate and that prejudice their chances of happiness and success. Albert
Ellis calls these basic irrational assumptions.
ABC Model
o Example:
B. Beliefs about A:
I’m unacceptable as a friend – so I must be worthless as a person (Evaluation).
C. Reaction:
Emotions: depressed
Behaviors: avoiding people generally.
Note: ‘A’ alone does not cause ‘C’ – ‘A’ triggers off ‘B,’ and ‘B’ then causes ‘C’. Also,
ABC episodes do not stand alone: they run in chains, with a ‘C’ often becoming the ‘A’
of another episode – we observe our own emotions and behaviors and react to them. For
instance, the person in example above could observe their avoidance of other people,
interpret this as weak and engage in self-downing.
Ellis believes that it is not the activating event (A) that causes negative emotional and
behavioral consequences (C), but rather that a person interprets these events
unrealistically and therefore has an irrational belief system (B) that helps cause the
consequences (C)
ABCDE Model
The ABC format is extended to include ‘D’ (Disputing irrational beliefs) and ‘E’ (the new
Effect the client wishes to achieve, i.e. new ways of feeling and behaving).
EXAMPLE:
A. Activating event - You fail a big exam.
B. Belief about the event - You believe, 'I'm not smart enough.
C. Emotional or behavioral response - You feel depressed and rip up all of your study material.
D. Disputation - You realize that you are not required to always pass every exam.
E. New effect/emotions and behaviors - You feel disappointed but start studying to do better next
time.
What is irrational thinking?
To describe a belief as irrational is to say that:
1. It blocks a person from achieving their goals
2. It distorts reality
3. It contains illogical ways of evaluating oneself, others and the world: demandingness,
awfulising, discomfort-intolerance and people-rating.
TWO TYPES OF DISTURBANCE
Ego disturbance
o Represents an upset to the self-image
o It results from holding demands about one’s ‘self’ (e.g. ‘I must…do well/not
fail/get approval of others’; followed by negative self-evaluations such as: ‘When
I fail/get this approval/etc. this proves I am no good’ and so on. This belief
create…
o Ego anxiety – emotional tension resulting from the perception that one’s ‘self’ or
personal worth is threatened.
Discomfort disturbance
o Results from demands about others (e.g. ‘People must treat me right’) and about
the world (e.g. ‘The circumstances under which I live must be the way I want’).
o Two types:
Low frustration-tolerance (LFT)
Results from demands that frustration not happened, followed by
catastrophizing when it does.
It is based on beliefs like: “The world owes me contentment and
happiness;’ or: ‘Things should be as I want them to be, and I can’t
stand it when they are not.’
Low discomfort-tolerance (LDT)
Arises from demands that one not experience emotional or
physical discomfort, with catastrophizing when discomfort does
occur.
It is based on beliefs like: ‘I should be able to feel happy all the
time;’ ‘I must be able to feel comfortable all of the time,’
‘Discomfort and pain are awful and intolerable, and I must avoid
them at all costs;’ ‘I must not feel bad;’ and so on.
o Discomfort disturbance leads to problem like:
Secondary disturbance (upsetting oneself about having a problem, e.g.
becoming anxious about being anxious, depressed about being depressed,
and so on.)
Guilt is a common secondary disturbance: for instance, people with
anger problems may down themselves because they have trouble
controlling their rage.
FOUR TYPES OF EVALUATIVE BELIEF
1) Demandingness
Also known as ‘musturbation’
The way people hold unconditional should and absolutistic musts – believing that
certain things must or must not happen, and that certain conditions (for example
success, love, or approval) are absolute necessities.
REBT suggest three basic musts:
1. Demands about the self;
2. Demands about others;
3. Demands about the world
2. Awfulizing
Occurs when we exaggerate the consequences of past, present or future events;
seeing them as the worst that could happen.
Characterized by words like ‘awful’, ‘terrible’, ‘horrible’.
3. Discomfort intolerance
Often referred to as ‘can’t-stand-it-it is’, is based on the idea that one cannot bear
some circumstance or events; seeing them as the worst that could happen.
It often follows awfulizing and can fuel demands that certain things not happen.
4. People-rating
It represents and overgeneralization whereby a person evaluates a specific trait,
behavior or action according to some standard of desirability or worth. They then
apply the evaluation to their total person – e.g. ‘I did a bad thing; therefore, I am a
bad person.’
3 LEVELS OF THINKING
1. Inferences
Statements or ‘fact’ (or at least what we think are the facts – they can be true or
false).
In REBT, little time is spent on a client’s inferences – they are regarded as
significant only in the sense that they provide a window to the evaluative
thinking.
2. Evaluations
More significantly from the REBT perspective, as well as making inferences
about things happen, we go beyond the ‘facts’ to evaluate them in terms of what
they mean to us.
Irrational evaluations consist of one or more of the four types of beliefs listed
earlier.
3. Core beliefs
Guiding a person’s inferences and evaluations are their underlying, general core
beliefs.
An example of general core belief that would apply to the inference and
evaluation are using as our example could be: ‘For me to be worthwhile as a
person I must have someone who loves me unreservedly.’
Psychotherapy
REBT has been successfully used to help people with a range of clinical and non-clinical
problems, using a variety of modalities.
It aims not at ‘positive thinking’ but rather at realistic thoughts, emotions and behaviors
that are in proportion to the events and circumstances an individual experience.
It is educative and collaborative. Clients learn the therapy and how to use it on
themselves (rather than have it ‘done to them’).
REBT is a method of psychotherapy, so the emphasis is on helping people change how
they feel and behave in reaction to life events.
It tends to be humanistic, anti-moralistic, and scientific. Human beings are the arbiters of
what is right or wrong for them.
Its emphasis is on profound and lasting change in the underlying belief system of the
client, rather than simply eliminating the presenting symptoms.
Critical Evaluation
Rational emotive behavior therapists have cited many studies in support of this
approach. Most early studies were conducted on people with experimentally induced
anxieties or non-clinical problems such as mild fear of snakes (Kendall & Kriss, 1983).
However, a number of recent studies have been done on actual clinical subjects and have
also found that rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) is often helpful (Lyons &
Woods 1991).
COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY – AARON BECK
Anger management
Social anxiety
Depression
Panic or anxiety attacks
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Sleep problems
Mood swings
Eating disorders
Drug abuse and alcohol dependency
Relationship and sex issues
Beck suggests that most individuals are not aware of their core beliefs.
Focusing minimally on the past, CBT initially shows clients how their current
thinking affects attitudes, feelings and behaviors.