(Proficient Teachers)
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Secondary Education plus 24 units in Masters
of Arts in Education
Experience 27 years
Experience
Department of Education
JOB SUMMARY
Page 1 of 1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RHEINJOHN A. SAMPANG Name of Rater: ARNEL B. HAJAN, Ed.D.
Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL II
District/School: BEGANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
2. Used a range of Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, was shown
enhance learner writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in Quality numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills 5
literacy and as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
numeracy skills. 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
7 6 5 4
June 2018
to April 10.0% Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No 5 0.500
2019 least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons centered lessons centered lessons lesson as evidence
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV evidently shown was shown
1 and supported 1 and supported 1 and supported in any 1 of the
Efficiency
by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV 5
other MOV given other MOV given other MOV given
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies to
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical was shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
thinkling, as well Quality other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as 5
as other higher- shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills.
June 2018
to April 7.5% 5 0.375
2019 Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons as least 3 lessons as least 2 lessons as lesson as acceptable
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 of the given was shown
Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV 5
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
classroom management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
structure to
AND engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners was shown
engage learners, in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
DIVERSITY OF individually or in Quality 5
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
LEARNERS groups, in 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
meaningful 7 6 5 4
explanation, June 2018
discovery and to April 7.5% 4.5 0.338
hands-on activities 2019 Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
within a range of least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson supported acceptable
supported by supported by supported by by any of the evidence
physical learning
environments. Efficiency MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable MOV was shown 4
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RHEINJOHN A. SAMPANG Name of Rater: ARNEL B. HAJAN, Ed.D.
Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL II
District/School: BEGANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Page 1 of 4
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of evidence
constructively by
AND learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior was shown
applying positive that promote that promote that promote that promote
DIVERSITY OF and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
LEARNERS discipline to violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
ensure learning-
Quality
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 4
focused submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
environments. rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
June 2018
to April 7.5% 4.5 0.338
2019
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the of the given acceptable
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as evidence
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only was shown
Efficiency least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
PLANNING implemented
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced was shown
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced learning process learning process learning process learning process
teaching and Quality as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV 4
learning 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
processes to meet 7 6 5 4
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
June 2018 least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
to April 7.5% developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced evidence 4.5 0.338
2019 sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and was shown
teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV
Efficiency
and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 5
any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV
given MOV
3. 7. Planned,
managed and
implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
INDIVIDUAL
curriculum PERFORMANCE
processes to meet
COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
requirements and
Name of Employee: RHEINJOHN
varied teaching A. SAMPANG Name of Rater: ARNEL B. HAJAN, Ed.D.
contexts.
Position: TEACHER III June 2018 Position: PRINCIPAL II
District/School: BEGANG NATIONALtoHIGH 7.5%
April SCHOOL
Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019 4.5 0.338
2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Timeliness
Page 2 of 4
3. CURRICULUM 8. Participated in Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in acceptable
AND LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence
discussions that
PLANNING meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to was shown
use teacher and discuss discuss discuss discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
practice.
Quality
enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction
4
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
June 2018
to April 7.5% 4.5 0.338
2019 Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ acceptable
FGDs/meetings meetings as meetings as meeting as evidence
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown was shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
Efficiency the given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV 5
Timeliness
Timeliness
June 2018
to April 7.5% 4.5 0.338
2019
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
4.
Name of Employee: 10. Designed,
RHEINJOHN A. SAMPANG Name of Rater: ARNEL B. HAJAN, Ed.D.
selected,
Position: TEACHER
organized III
and Position: PRINCIPAL II
used diagnostic,
District/School: BEGANG
formativeNATIONAL
and HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019
Rating Period: JUNEsummative
2018-APRIL 2019
assessment
strategies
consistent with TO BE FILLED OUT
curriculum TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
requirements.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
June 2018 ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory SCORE
to April 7.5%
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1) RESULTS Q E T 4.5
AVE 0.338
2019 Satisfactory (4) (2)
Timeliness
Page 3 of 4
4. ASSESSMENT 11. Monitored and Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
AND evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence
progress and
REPORTING progress and progress and progress and and achievement was shown
achievement using achievement achievement achievement using learner
learner attainment
data.
Quality using learner using learner using learner attainment data 4
attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in MOV
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted
June 2018
to April 7.5% 4.7 0.350
2019 Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable evidence 5
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
related performed performed performed various related acceptable
various related various related various related works/activities evidence
works/activities
works/activities works/activities works/activities that contribute to was shown
that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to the teaching-
the teaching-
learning process
Quality the teaching- the teaching- the teaching- learning process 4
learning process learning process learning process as shown in the
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
June 2018 MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
to April 5% 4 0.200
2019
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
least 4 different different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable acceptable
Efficiency kinds of
acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV evidence
was shown
4
Timeliness
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: RHEINJOHN A. SAMPANG Name of Rater: ARNEL B. HAJAN, Ed.D.
Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL II
District/School: BEGANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: APRIL 5, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018-APRIL 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER Very Unsatisfactory RESULTS
SCORE
KRA QET Outstanding (5)
Satisfactory (4)
Satisfactory (3)
(2)
Poor (1) Q E T AVE
Approving Authority:
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
1. CONTENT 1. Applied knowledge of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No
content within and and/or inter-observer agreement form about of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its acceptable
KNOWLEDGE integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within evidence
across curricuoum knowledge of content within and across subject
AND PEDAGOGY across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas and across subject was shown
teaching areas. areas as shown in MOV1 as shown in MOV1 as shown in MOV1 areas as shown in
Quality
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV1 with a rating
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed of 4
highlighting integration of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
3. Instructional materials highlighting mastery of Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 the No
content and its integration in other subject areas leassons using MOV leassons using MOV leassons using MOV given MOV acceptable
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by evidence
any 1of the other any 1of the other any 1of the other was shown
Efficiency given MOV given MOV given MOV
4. Performance tasks/test materials highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
2. Used a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
teaching strategies and/or inter-observer agreement form about different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
that enhance learner teaching strategies that enhance learner
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, was shown
achievement in achievement in literacy and numeracy skills writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
skills. Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials highlighting learner- Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 learner- No
centered strategies that promote literacy and/or learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered centered lesson as acceptable
lessons as shown in lessons as shown in lessons as shown in evidently shown in evidence
numeracy skills
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given was shown
Efficiency supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
teaching given given given
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
3. Applied a range of 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching strategies to and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence
develop critical and teaching strategies to develop critical and
and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking was shown
creative thinkling, as creative thinking, as well as other higher-order and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
well as other higher- thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking skills. Quality with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-centered strategies that
develop critical and creative thinking, and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials highlighting different Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted 1 lesson No
teaching strategies that develop critical and lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by any acceptable
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 1 of the given MOV evidence
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
and supported by and supported by and supported by was shown
Efficiency any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
given MOV given MOV given MOV
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
2. LEARNING 4. Managed classroom 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No
structure to engage and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
learners, individually managing classroom structure that engages
AND DIVERSITY engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in was shown
or in groups, in learners in various activities activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
OF LEARNERS meaningful Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
explanation, discovery 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting various a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
and hands-on classroom management strategies that engage
activities within a learners in activities/tasks in different physical
range of physical learning environments
learning
environments. 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the the acceptable MOV evidence
Efficiency the other acceptable other acceptable other acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
2. LEARNING 5. Managed learner Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about management management management management acceptable
ENVIRONMENT strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence
constructively by teacher management of learner behavior using
AND DIVERSITY behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that was shown
applying positive and the following strategies: promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and promote positive
OF LEARNERS non-violent discipline non-violent discipline non-violent discipline non-violent discipline and non-violent
1. Providing motivation Quality
to ensure learning- as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV discipline as shown
focused environments. submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a in MOV submitted
2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
4. Ensuring learner's active participation Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
5. Allowing learners to express their ideas/opinions strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson was shown
Efficiency lessons lessons lessons
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
6. Used differentiated, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No
developmentally and/or inter-observer agreement form about teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to differentiated acceptable
address learner address learner address learner teaching strategies evidence
appropriate learning using differentiated, developmentally appropriate
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in to address learner shown
experiencce to learning experiences Quality MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating diversity as shown
address learner's of 7 of 6 of 5 in MOV 1 with a
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed rating of 4
strengths, interests highlighting differentiation in content, product,
and experiences. process, learning environment or others
according to learners' gender, needs, strengths, Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 No
interests and experiences differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategy in evidence
3. Instructional materials highlighting differentiation at least 2 leassons at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as shown
in content, product, process, learning as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidently shown in
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by any 1 of the No
environment or others according to learners' Efficiency supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable
gender, needs, strengths, interests and of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidence
experiences acceptable MOV was shown
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 7. Planned, managed 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
and implemented and/or inter-observer agreement form about implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
AND PLANNING developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
developmentally using developmentally sequenced teaching and
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching was shown
sequenced teaching learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning
and learning Quality as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in
processes to meet 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
curriculumrequirement highlighting developmetally sequenced of 4
s and varied teaching instruction that meet curriculum goals and varied
contents. teaching contexts
Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated 1 No
least 4 LACs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ meeting acceptable
FGDs/meetings as meetings as meetings as as evidently shown evidence
Efficiency evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in any 1 of the given was shown
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given MOV
MOV MOV MOV
8. Participated in
collegial discussions
that use teacher and
learner feedback to
enrich teaching
practice.
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Satisfactory
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Timeliness
3. CURRICULUM 9. Selected, developed, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Developed and used 6Developed and 6Developed and 6Developed and No
organized, and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about varied teaching and used varied teaching used varied teaching used varied teaching acceptable
AND PLANNING learning resources and learning and learning and learning evidence
appropriate teaching using appropriate teaching and learning
including ICT, to resources including resources including resources including was shown
and learning resources, including ICT address learning ICT, to address ICT, to address ICT, to address
resources, including Quality goals as shown in learning goals as learning goals as learning goals as
ICT, to address Examples: Activity sheets/tasks sheets/work MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
learning goals. sheets, powerpoint presentations, video clips, of 7 a rating of 8 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
module, SIMs-Strategic Intervention Matertials,
Other
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with apprropriate Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No
instructional materials appended varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and acceptable
learning resources resources including resources including learning resource evidence
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently including ICT, as was shown
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in
3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Efficiency MOV 1 and supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any of the
supported by any 1 of the acceptable of the acceptable acceptable MOV
of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
4. ASSESMENT 10. Designed, selected, 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No
organized and used and/or inter-observer agreement form about organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used acceptable
AND diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative evidence
diagnostic, formative using diagnostic, formative and summative
REPORTING and summative and summative and summative and summative was shown
and summative assessment startegies assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent
consistent with 2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum
highlighting appropriate use of formative Quality
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. assessment strategies shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
3. Develop diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS reviewed
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished
questionaire/answer sheets
4. Develop summative tests: (a) with TOS reviewed Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No
by superior; (b) with sample accomplished varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as acceptable
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence
questionaire/answer sheets
shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the was shown
Efficiency acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
5. Develop performance tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics
11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of learner's written work with Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored No
evaluated learner summary of results and with signature of parents monitored and and evaluated monitored and and evaluated acceptable
evaluated learner learner progress and evaluated learner learner progress and evidence
progress and
progress and achievement using progress and achievement using was shown
achievement using achievement using learner attainment achievement using learner attainment
learner attainment Quality
2. Formative/summative assessment tools with learner attainment data as shown in learner attainment data as shown in
data. data as shown in MOV submitted data as shown in MOV submitted
TOS and frequency of errors with identified least
MOV submitted MOV submitted
mastered skills
12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No
promptly and clearly the same 3 learners innthe same learning area prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear acceptable
communication of the communication of the communication of the communication of evidence
the learner's needs, with parents' or guardians' signature and date of
learner's needs, learner's needs, learner's needs, the learner's needs, was shown
progress and receipt progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to key 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-Teacher
achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
stakeholders, conferences in all quarters with proof of Quality stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ parents'/guardians' attendance including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
3. Report cards with parent's or guardian's in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
signature in all quarters supported by minutes of submitted submitted submitted submitted
meeting
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Means of Verification
KRA's OBJECTIVES Very
(MOV) QET Outstanding
Submitted a Submitted a
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Submitted a Unsatisfactory
Submitted any 1 of Poor
No
combination of at(5) combination of 3 of combination of(3)
2 of the given MOV (2) (1)
acceptable
Efficiency least 4 of the (4)MOV the acceptable MOV
the acceptable evidence
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per quarter acceptable MOV was shown
6. Other documents showing learner needs, Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No
progress and achievement submitted to other distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 acceptable
Timeliness quarters quarters quarters quarter evidence
stakeholders
was shown
5. PLUS FACTOR 13. Performed various 1. Certificate of Recognition or Participation Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No
related works/activities performed various various related performed various various related acceptable
that contribute to the 2. Certificate of Training related works/activities that related works/activities that evidence
works/activities that contribute to the works/activities that contribute to the was shown
teaching-learning 3. Certificate of Speakership contribute to the teaching-learning contribute to the teaching-learning
process teaching-learning process as shown in teaching-learning process as shown in
4. Committee involvement Quality
process as shown in the MOV submitted process as shown in the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
6. Book or Journal Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOV acceptable
8. Coaching and mentoring learners in Efficiency acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence
competitions was shown
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and provide annotations) Timeliness
RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teachers)
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
3. Certificate of Speakership
4. Committee involvement
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
related works/activities
that contribute to the
teaching-learning
process
REMARKS
KRA's OBJECTIVES Acceptable MOVs Submitted MOVs
VALID INVALID
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5 3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
4
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
3 Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good
grooming and communication. 4 3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd strategies and
1
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. directions.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improves systems and 5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further
help others improve their effectiveness. enhance service delivery.
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
5 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization. 5
or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may succeed with minimal resources.
include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY 4.00
RATINGS
rfcuevas2019
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
A. Functional Competencies
Feedback:
MID-YEAR REVIEW/RATING
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATEE (Teacher) RATER (Principal) MID-YEAR REVIEW
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE MOV TARGET
PER KRA RESULTS
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ ACTION PLAN SIGNATURE
(Rater/Ratee)
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
RATING SHEET
OBSERVER: DATE:
TEACHER OBSERVED:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
1. Rate each item on the checklist according to how well the teacher performed during the classroom observation.
Mark the appropriate column with a (/) mark.
2. Each indicator is assessed on an individual basis.
3. Attach your Observation Notes Form to the completed rating sheet.
THE TEACHER 3 4 5 6 7 NO
1. Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas
Note: For schools with only one observer (i.e., Principal), this form serve as the final rating sheet.
Signature over Printed Name of the Observer Signature over Printed Name of the Teacher
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) - RPMS
TEACHER I-III
INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT FORM
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of Signature over Printed Name of
Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3
OBSERVER 2:
DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
DIRECTIONS FOR THE OBSERVER:
OBSERVER: DATE:
OBSERVATION: 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: