National University
Richard Regal
Abstract
The following is a reflection on TPE Domain 1A and my strengths and needs within that
Language Arts teacher and the rationale for certain my artifacts for this domain.
Arts
TELLING MY STORY USING MY PDQP 3
Evaluating My Progress
Teaching is a profession that requires much from its subject, including an understanding
of how to disseminate educational material to students. Depending on the subject matter, the
techniques and requirements can change. Other factors include the age of the students, the
environment the students are taught in, the ability level of all students in a class, and many more
factors. According to the California Teaching Performance Expectations document, TPE 1A sets
the standard for English Language Arts teachers in making subject matter comprehensible to
students (2013, p.2). The TPE states that “candidates demonstrate the ability to teach the state-
adopted academic content standards to students,” which includes “Reading, Writing, Speaking
and Listening, and Language within the standards that establish a progression of increasing
complexity” (2013, p.2) After teaching for over 4 years, I feel that I have become quite competent
in achieving this domain. My most recent teacher evaluation (Artifact 1) supports this belief,
showing that I scored top marks under Standards 1 and 2, indicator 1. According to the Nevada
Educator Performance Framework Rubric, Standard 1 determines if the teacher connected prior
learning and experiences to new learning, while Standard 2 determines if the teacher created
learning tasks that place high cognitive demand on diverse learners (2017, p.1).
an English Language Arts class, the focus is obviously reading, writing, and speaking skills, but I
like to present lessons and tasks that appeal to a wide variety of learning styles. I use audio,
visuals, and tactile features in my lessons to help my students better engage with the material. I
TELLING MY STORY USING MY PDQP 4
think by appealing to a wide variety of learning styles, I can more effectively make my lessons
more comprehensible for students. I also ensure that my lessons are high in rigor and demand
plenty of effort on part of the student. One area of focus for me in regard to this domain would be
my ability to quickly determine or grade whether or not my students have found a lesson
understandable. This would also include a way for students to self-assess themselves in a timely
manner, allowing them to check their own progress and make inquiries as needed.
The most important competency for me moving forward with this domain is to “determine
the effectiveness of instruction and students’ proficiency after instruction” (California Teaching
Performance Expectations, 2013, p.2). Time flies over the course of a school year and it can be
easy to get lost in planning ahead, but it is obviously imperative that we understand how
proficient our students are after a unit or lesson before we move on. This information not only
benefits our students by allowing us to reteach if needed, but it also allows us to decide if a lesson
Rationale
indicator from my supervisor that I can effectively make my lessons comprehensible for all
students. I also have included my literary review of an article dealing with teaching students with
different learning styles (Artifact 2). I reviewed this article because I think reaching learners of all
types is key in making lessons comprehensible for students. Finally, my final artifact (Artifact 3)
introduces one of our class novels, “The Outsiders”. This lesson shows my use of differentiation
TELLING MY STORY USING MY PDQP 5
between learner types and my use of text, technology, writing, reading, and communication
between students.
TELLING MY STORY USING MY PDQP 6
References:
prep/standards/adopted-tpes-2013.pdf