Setting (check one): ____ Formal ____ Non-formal Number of learners enrolled in class:
Number of learners in attendance on day of
monitoring visit:
Student: Teacher Ratio -
Type of SC Intervention (check all that apply): Length of SC Support (check one):
___ Provision of teaching and learning materials ____ Less than 6 months
___ In-service teacher or pre-service training with particular attention to child-centered and ____ One year or less
gender-sensitive methodologies. ____ 1-2 years
___ Promote inclusion in curriculum and training on safety measures, health promotion, ____ More than 2 years
tolerance and diversity, or mother tongue instruction
___ Promote the establishment of student groups in schools, or student participation in School Length of time teacher is working in school/site:
Management Committees (SMC) or School Boards ____ Less than 1 year
___ Teacher training on participatory teaching methods to improve children’s participation in ____ 1-3 years
the classroom and the learning process. ____ More than 3 years
___ Train teachers on alternatives to corporal punishment and degrading treatment, and on
child rights and protection issues
___ Introduce a code of conduct for teachers/students.
___ Promote parent participation in PTAs/SMCs or School Boards
___ Engage communities in establishing mechanisms to protect children from threats en route
to school and in school.
___ Other type of intervention
(Describe:____________________________________________)
Not Applicable (NA) = An indicator is not applicable if your program or project activities do not specifically target the item. For example, if your project
deals with program refurbishment or construction, you can score NA to items that do not deal with a program or learning site’s physical environment. For
items which you select NA, you must provide a justification to support your choice in the space below.
Note: A consultative process is required prior to data collection to decide which items may not be applicable (NA) to your program or
country context. Your office should propose and confirm this list with the EdGI M&E Advisor (or regional education advisors) prior to data
collection.
1 = Indicator is not at all achieved: There is no evidence that any efforts have been made to achieve the monitoring indicator.
2 = Indicator is almost achieved: Some efforts to achieve the monitoring indicator are observed, although they are not yet enough to achieve the indicator.
Some additional work is required to ensure the indicator is achieved.
3 = Indicator is achieved: There is consistent evidence that the monitoring indicator has been successfully reached in the learning environment.
4 = Indicator is exceeded: There is direct and consistent evidence that level 3 has been achieved and that the indicator has exceeded education
project/program-level expectations or objectives. There is evidence that a variety of methods are used to go beyond the minimum expectation set by the
education project/program and ensure an exceptionally high/excellent level of quality during implementation.
Concrete examples should be noted in the margins of this form or on additional sheets of paper during the observation to help you and your team assign the
correct rating/score to each indicator and provide the necessary evidence to justify your rating/score.
Please see the accompanying QLE Data Collection Manual for further information.
Item Score:
1 2 3 4
2.6 Learners participate NA -Learning site does -Most learners -All learners participate -Teachers regularly educate
in health-promotion not offer health participate in health in health promotion learners about importance
programs, such as promotion programs promotion programs programs and connections between
deworming, nutritional -OR learners/staff do -OR some health -Comprehensive package their health and their
(micronutrients) not participate in promotion programs of programs meeting educational achievement
supplements, and health such programs (low are offered but a needs of learners in this -Teachers use participatory,
education (Note: these uptake) more comprehensive community is skills-focused techniques to
programs may be extra- package of services is consistently provided educate learners in health
Item Score:
1 2 3 4
3.8 Teachers develop NA -Teachers have not -Teachers use some -Teachers develop and -Teachers continuously
and follow lesson plans. developed lesson sort of lesson follow lesson plan reflect and improve on their
(Note: requires plans planning but do not according to curriculum lesson plans to ensure they
consultation with -Teachers report not adhere to it during - Teachers check are relevant to learner
teachers). knowing how to use teaching homework to assess culture and context
lesson planning in understanding of lessons -Teachers exchange
Item Score: their work and adjust lesson plan experiences and ideas
1 2 3 4 based on learners’ needs among colleagues
-Teachers include learners in
the lesson planning to
ensure lesson plan is aligned
Item Score:
1 2 3 4
3.10 Teachers are NA -Teachers report no -Teachers report -Teachers are regularly -Supervisors take into
provided continuous support from some support from supervised account teachers’ skills and
support to improve supervisors supervisors or peers -Teachers are abilities when planning
their practice in key -Teachers do not (e.g. teaching consistently offered professional development
areas. (Note: requires regularly attend clusters) opportunities for activities
consultation with professional -Teachers attend at professional -All training activities are
teachers). development least 1 workshop or development in relevant followed up on by
workshops/meetings professional topics supervisors or school
Item Score: development activity -Teachers participate in management
1 2 3 4 during the school 2 or more professional
year development activities
per school year
3.11 The program uses NA No assessments are -Opportunities for -Some assessment -Range of assessment
validated assessment used OR limited individual interactions techniques used techniques used flexibly and
Item Score:
FINAL COMMENTS
1. Please provide any important contextual/environmental information that may have impacted (either positively or negatively) the ratings assigned to this
learning environment. Examples include events outside of your office’s control, such as conflict, natural disasters, unexpected cuts in funding. Please use
additional paper if more room is necessary.