REPORT ON EXAMINATION
OF THE
AS OF
Sir:
In accordance with instructions contained in Appointment No. 21911, dated July 3, 2002
and annexed hereto, an examination has been made into the condition and affairs of Gerber Life
Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as “the Company,” at its home office located at 1311
Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, New York 10605.
Wherever “Department” appears in this report, it refers to the State of New York
Insurance Department.
The report indicating the results of this examination is respectfully submitted.
http://www.ins.state.ny.us
2
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The examiner’s review of a sample of transactions did not reveal any differences which
materially affected the Company’s financial condition as presented in its financial statements
contained in the December 31, 2001 filed annual statement. (See item 5 of this report)
The Company violated Section 3201(b)(1) of the New York Insurance Law by using
unapproved policy forms. (See item 6B of this report)
The Company violated Section 3207(c) of the New York Insurance Law by issuing
policies to minors in excess of the limits allowed by Law. (See item 6B of this report)
The Company violated Section 3207(e)(1) of the New York Insurance Law by paying
claims in excess of the limits allowed by Law. (See item 6C of this report)
3
2. SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
The prior examination was conducted as of December 31, 1998. This examination covers
the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001. As necessary, the examiner
reviewed transactions occurring subsequent to December 31, 2001 but prior to the date of this
report (i.e., the completion date of the examination).
The examination comprised a verification of assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2001 to determine whether the Company’s 2001 filed annual statement fairly presents its
financial condition. The examiner reviewed the Company’s income and disbursements
necessary to accomplish such verification and utilized the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners’ Examiners Handbook or such other examination procedures, as deemed
appropriate, in such review and in the review or audit of the following matters:
Company history
Management and control
Corporate records
Fidelity bond and other insurance
Officers' and employees' welfare and pension plans
Territory and plan of operation
Market conduct activities
Growth of Company
Business in force by states
Mortality and loss experience
Reinsurance
Accounts and records
Financial statements
The examiner reviewed the prior report on examination which did not contain any
violations, recommendations or comments.
This report on examination is confined to financial statements and comments on those
matters which involve departure from laws, regulations or rules, or which require explanation or
description.
4
3. DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY
A. History
The Company was incorporated as a stock life insurance company under the laws of New
York on December 22, 1967, was licensed and commenced business on September 20, 1968.
Initial resources of $4,970,250, consisting of common capital stock of $1,000,000 and paid in
and contributed surplus of $3,970,250, were provided through the sale of 100,000 shares of
common stock (with a par value of $10 each) for $49.7025 per share. Changes in the capital and
surplus of the Company since incorporation resulted in capital and paid in and contributed
surplus of $2,504,250 and $16,216,00 respectively as of December 31, 2001.
In August 1994, Gerber Holding Company was formed by Sandoz Corporation in order
to purchase Gerber Products Company.
In March 1996, Sandoz Corporation and Ciba-Geigy, a large Swiss pharmaceutical
company merged. The merger created Novartis Corporation, the second largest pharmaceutical
company in the world. Novartis Corporation then became the new ultimate parent of the
Company.
B. Holding Company
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Gerber Products Company (“Gerber
Products”), a Michigan corporation and a leading producer of baby foods. The Company’s
ultimate parent is Novartis Corporation, a Switzerland pharmaceutical company.
An organization chart reflecting the relationship between the Company and significant
entities in its holding company system as of December 31, 2001 follows:
NOVARTIS CORPORATION
The Company had four service agreements in effect as of December 31, 2001.
1. The Company has a service agreement with its parent, whereby the Company receives
supportive facilities and services in the administrative, advertising and computer areas.
2. The Company has a general agency agreement with Gerber Family Services, Inc.
(“GFS”).
3. The Company has a service agreement with GFS, whereby the Company provides
supportive facilities, services and materials in the administrative and advertising areas to GFS.
4. The Company also has a service agreement with GFS whereby the Company purchases
surplus advertising materials at cost from GFS.
C. Management
The Company’s by-laws provide that the board of directors shall be comprised of not less
than nine and not more than 15 directors. The number of directors shall be increased to not less
than 13 within one year following the end of the calendar year in which the Company’s admitted
assets exceed $1.5 billion. Directors are elected for a period of one year at the annual meeting of
the stockholders held in April of each year. As of December 31, 2001, the board of directors
consisted of ten members. Meetings of the board are held in January, April, July and October.
The ten board members and their principal business affiliation, as of December 31, 2001,
were as follows:
Year First
Name and Residence Principal Business Affiliation Elected
Year First
Name and Residence Principal Business Affiliation Elected
* Not affiliated with the Company or any other company in the holding company system
In January 2002, Alfred A. Piergallini retired from the board. In January 2003, Kurt P.
Furger and Ellen B. Yuracko resigned from the board, Ronald J. Masiero resigned as President
and Chairman but will remain a member of the board. Also in January of 2003 Frank Palantoni
was elected Chairman of the board, Wesley Protheroe, Andre Cadieux and Keith O’Reilly were
elected to serve on the board.
The examiner’s review of the minutes of the meetings of the board of directors and its
committees indicated that meetings were well attended and that each director attended a majority
of meetings.
7
The following is a listing of the principal officers of the Company as of December 31,
2001:
Name Title
In January 2003 Ronald J. Masiero and Ellen B. Yuracko retired from the Company.
Effective November 1, 2002 Wesley Protheroe was elected President of the Company.
* Designated consumer services officer per Section 216.4(c) of Department Regulation No. 64
8
E. Reinsurance
As of December 31, 2001, the Company had reinsurance treaties in effect with over 70
companies, of which 12 were authorized or accredited. The Company’s life and accident and
health businesses are reinsured on a coinsurance, quota share, and yearly renewable term basis.
Reinsurance is provided on an automatic basis.
The maximum retention limit for individual life contracts is $30,000 per life on standard
rated cases, $10,000 per life on substandard risk and $15,000 on accidental death benefits. On its
guaranteed issue individual life business, the Company generally reinsures 75% of policy
amounts in excess of $5,000. The total face amount of life insurance ceded, as of December 31,
2001, was $758,128,954 which represents 3.9% of the total face amount of life insurance in
force. Reserve credit taken for reinsurance ceded to unauthorized companies and reinsurance
recoverables from unauthorized companies, totaling $31,504,350, was supported by letters of
credit.
The total face amount of life insurance assumed, as of December 31, 2001, was
$1,218,876,673. This represents 6% of the total life insurance in force.
9
The Company’s invested assets as of December 31, 2001 were mainly comprised of
bonds (90.2%) and cash and short-term investments (5.3%).
The Company’s entire bond portfolio, as of December 31, 2001, was comprised of
investment grade obligations.
The ordinary lapse ratio for each of the examination years was 15.5% in 2001, 16.3% in
2000 and 18.0% in 1999.
10
The following is the net gain (loss) from operations by line of business after federal
income taxes but before realized capital gains (losses) reported for each of the years under
examination in the Company’s filed annual statements:
1999 2000 2001
The increase in the group accident and health business in 2001 is due to the Company’s
decision to decrease the amount of reinsurance ceded and retain a greater portion of this
profitable line of business.
The accident and health other line is a closed block of Medicare Supplement business.
11
5. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following statements show the assets, liabilities, capital, surplus and other funds as of
December 31, 2001, as contained in the Company’s 2001 filed annual statement, a condensed
summary of operations and a reconciliation of the capital and surplus account for each of the
years under review. The examiner’s review of a sample of transactions did not reveal any
differences which materially affected the Company’s financial condition as presented in its
financial statements contained in the December 31, 2001 filed annual statement.
Admitted Assets
Bonds $464,792,805
Stocks:
Common stocks 13,823,624
Real estate:
Properties occupied by the company 44,010
Policy loans 9,067,089
Cash and short term investments 27,503,955
Other invested assets 52,654
Reinsurance ceded:
Amounts recoverable from reinsurers 1,084,525
Commissions and expense allowances due 4,834,993
Guaranty funds receivable or on deposit 179,263
Life insurance premiums and annuity considerations
deferred and uncollected on in force business 36,207,802
Accident and health premiums due and unpaid 1,114,544
Investment income due and accrued 7,990,750
Due from joint ventures 13,334,115
Other receivables 35,289
The examiner reviewed various elements of the Company’s market conduct activities
affecting policyholders, claimants, and beneficiaries to determine compliance with applicable
statutes and regulations and the operating rules of the Company.
Brochures which contained five unapproved application forms were utilized in the
Company’s mass marketing advertisements for two different products. These applications were
accepted by the Company in the issuance of insurance.
The Company violated Section 3201(b)(1) of the New York Insurance Law by using
unapproved policy application forms.
The review of policy number CGLT-860 entitled “Guaranteed Term Life Insurance Plan”
revealed it has been changed to “Decreasing Term Life Insurance Plan.” The changed policy
was not submitted to the Superintendent for approval.
The Company violated Section 3201(b)(1) of the New York Insurance Law by using an
unapproved policy form.
16
The review of new issues during the examination period revealed that the Company
issued policies in New York which exceeded the limits of life insurance in force on minors.
The Company violated Section 3207(c) of the New York Insurance Law by issuing
policies on minors in excess of the limits allowed by Law.
C. Treatment of Policyholders
The examiner reviewed a sample of various types of claims, surrenders, changes and
lapses. The examiner also reviewed the various controls involved, checked the accuracy of the
computations and traced the accounting data to the books of account.
The Company paid claims which were in excess of the limits of insurance allowed by
Law.
The Company violated Section 3207(e)(1) of the New York Insurance Law by paying
claims on policies on minors in excess of the limits allowed by Law.
17
C The Company violated Section 3207(c) of the New York Insurance Law 16
by issuing policies on minors in excess of the limits allowed by law.
/s/
Jo’Catena Hargrove
Senior Insurance Examiner
Jo’Catena Hargrove being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing report,
/s/
Jo’Catena Hargrove
this day of