SAHAWI S. MALIK
TEACHER III
ABSTRACT
may not be able to apply what they have learned in practice. If the
in lessons but more often outside the classroom. These are referred
Because they are not examined in the same way that the academic
curriculum is, and because most of them take place outside lessons,
Student life is the focus of the programs and activities of this school
Development;
Annex.
come up with concrete feedback that will serve as basis for the
offered to students.
programs of the school and be aware of the key areas which they
school.
development of students.
School Year 2017-2018 for they are the ones who have experienced
sampling.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Data Gathering
Research Method
Research Instrument
Statistical Tools
𝑋1− 𝑋2
t=
(𝑛 −1)𝑠2 2
1 +(𝑛2 −1)(𝑠1 )( 1 + 1 )
√( 1
𝑛1 +𝑛2 −2 𝑛1 𝑛2
are used:
Range Interpretation
Physical Moderately
3.96 0.646 5
Development Effective
Mental Moderately
3.95 0.660 6
Development Effective
Social Moderately
3.97 0.654 4
Development Effective
Emotional Moderately
4.04 0.673 2
Development Effective
Moral Moderately
4.11 0.654 1
Development Effective
Political Moderately
3.99 0.680 3
Development Effective
Moderately
Over-All 4.03 0.594
Effective
Generally, the students perceived that the co-curricular
said aspect.
deviation of 0.654.
equals 4.04 and sd = 0.673. These two domains indicate that the
mean = 3.95. This shows that students generally least perceived co-
curricular programs and services as academically-inclined activities
academic discussions.
Physical
0.638 0.524
Development NS
Mental
1.373 0.172
Development NS
Social NS
0.734 0.464
Development
Emotional NS
0.888 0.376
Development
Moral NS
1.348 0.180
Development
Political NS
0.753 0.453
Development
Over-All 1.194 0.230 NS
To determine whether there is a significant difference on
at 0.05.
sex. On the over-all t-test, the obtained t-value is 1.194 which when
community organizations.