Haylie S. Garrity
Abstract
This paper proposes a solution to uneducated decisions on vaccines and how the government can
fix it. Many anti- vax parents do not have the correct education on vaccines and rely on media to
make their decisions. The solution to this issue is that the government needs to pass a law that
requires all expecting parents to take an educational class on vaccination before choosing
whether or not they want to vaccinate their child. The paper proposes some concerns people
might have about the class such as cost or violation of human rights. Resolutions to these
concerns are addressed and it is explained why this method is better than others. Not enough is
being done in the health industry to prevent this now, so a different technique needs to be
directed.
“Are vaccines safe for children?” This question has been asked by parents for years, and
the controversy over vaccines continues to amplify in society. Many parents refuse or are
hesitant to vaccinate their children because of this question. An “anti-vax” parent is one who
decides against vaccinating their child. When parents see or hear that vaccines might cause
autism or injure children, they are more likely to decide not to vaccinate their children due to the
fear of this happening to them. The issue with this is that the information they are basing their
decision off of is invalid a majority of the time. Too many parents are making the decision not to
vaccinate their children without being properly educated on the topic. The government needs to
pass a law that requires expecting parents to take a class in order to educate them properly on
The biggest issues with parents who are anti-vax are that they are not educated enough on
vaccines because they rely on media to make their decisions, and this causes them to believe that
immunity through illness is more effective. For instance, an article done in the Department of
vaccination-related information are well transmitted and how it affects the decisions on
vaccinations. The result was that the experience-based view held by the parent was better
transmitted than the medical-based view held by the doctor (Jiménez, Á V., Stubbersfield, J. M.,
& Tehrani, J. J., 2018). This suggests that healthcare providers are not making a great enough
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 4
effort to portray information supporting the benefits of vaccines, so parents are relying on what
they hear from other sources. Parents will not receive accurate information on vaccines unless
they are given by an expert, therefore their decisions are made without the proper guidance.
Moreover, another article discusses a study done on why parents choose not to vaccinate
their children. Only 37.1% of the parents reported to seek information about vaccination from the
pediatrician, and 12% of them stated that their decision was based on the media (Bianco, A.,
Mascaro, V., Zucco, R., & Pavia, M., 2019). In other words, very few parents seek information
from healthcare providers and too many of them are basing their decisions off of media. These
numbers are extremely alarming and parents are putting their child more at risk by not receiving
the proper education on vaccines. Lastly, in the article, “Parental Attitudes and Perceptions
Associated with Childhood Vaccine Exemptions in High-exemption Schools,” a study was done
to determine how many people received highschool exemptions for vaccines. Respondents who
indicated that they sought care from a Naturopath or a Doctor of Osteopathy were statistically
significantly more likely to be exemptors (23.6%) than non-exemptors (7.8%). It states that these
anti-vax parents believed it was better for their child to develop immunity through illness rather
than vaccination (Pottinger, Jacobs, Haenchen, Ernst, 2018). It is clear that these parents do not
have enough knowledge on vaccines because it is statistically proven that developing immunity
through vaccination is more effective than through illness. Factual information regarding
vaccines needs to be presented to parents whether they seek care from a naturopathic doctor or
not. Parents need to be accurately educated on the topic of vaccines before making the decision
Due to this information, a class needs to be required, by law, for all expecting parents to
educate them further on vaccines and solve this problem. According to a research article on
clinical pediatrics, 96% of pediatricians were extremely concerned with the amount of vaccine
refusal and felt that patients would benefit from receiving more information regarding vaccines
(Cordrey, K., McLaughlin, L., Das, P., & Milanaik, R., 2018). Even healthcare providers such as
pediatricians agree that parents needs to be educated further on vaccines. A class required for
expecting parents would give them more information on vaccines so that they are confident in
Additionally, a study was done on pregnant women that evaluated the reasons for non-
vaccination and intention to receive the Tdap vaccine. The results stated that the most common
reason reported for non-vaccination was lack of a recommendation for Tdap by the woman’s
physician. The article also suggested that education interventions that provide targeted
information for pregnant women in an interactive manner may be useful to improve Tdap
vaccination (Kriss, J. L., Frew, P. M., et al., 2017). This study implies that physicians are not
providing information to pregnant women about vaccines and that it is negatively impacting the
rates of vaccination. If the rates of Tdap vaccines are decreasing due to lack of communication
by physicians, then the rates of other vaccines will drop as well. Since physicians are not
presenting expecting parents with information on vaccines, the vaccination class will resolve this
issue.
Finally, another evidence- based study was done to assess the outcome of mother’s
knowledge increase and HPV vaccine intent. As a result of the study, HPV vaccine uptake
numbers increased considerably compared to the HPV vaccine uptake numbers recorded prior to
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 6
educational intervention (Patricia A. Obulaney, Irene Gilliland & Holly Cassells, 2016).
Vaccination numbers for HPV increased after the experiment was done, supporting this solution
to be successful. Parents in this study were more likely to vaccinate their children after attending
the educational intervention on HPV, so applying this method to all vaccines will eliminate the
amount of parents who are hesitant on vaccination all together. Requiring expecting parents to
take a class on vaccines before choosing whether or not to vaccinate their children is crucial to
Some people might argue that requiring this class will violate basic human rights, that it
will be unaffordable for many families, or that parents who have already experienced vaccine-
related injury will not attend. To illustrate, the American Public Health Association claims that in
2006, schools began requiring the HPV vaccine for attendance and that some parents argue
requirement of vaccines is unconstitutional (Schwartz J. L., 2010). Because some parents believe
requiring vaccines is a violation of human rights, they might also argue that requiring the class
will be a violation as well. Since it is one’s legal right to refuse vaccination, it might be argued
Furthermore, The Journal of Women’s Health discusses the data of low income families
and health care. It states that 90% of low income and minority families receive public insurance
such as Medicaid (Perkins, R. B., Brogly, S. B., Adams, W. G., & Freund, K. M., 2012). Many
know that Medicaid is a government funded healthcare program that assists low income families
and individuals in paying for doctor visits, hospital stays, long-term medical, etc. Opposers
might argue that many parents will not be able to afford paying for this class. If these individuals
are already relying on public insurance, they will not be able to pay for an additional class.
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 7
for Vaccine Safety Surveillance,” discusses health outcomes related to vaccines. It states that the
average annualized vaccine incidences of adolescents aged 11–17 years old was 0.8 per 100,000
(Wormsbecker AE, Johnson C, Bourns L, Harris T, Crowcroft NS, Deeks SL, 2019). Although
this number is extremely low, some might argue that parents who have already experienced
vaccine- related injury will not attend the classes either way. The parents whose child has been
injured by a vaccine will most likely be opposed to the class and fight for anti- vaccination.
Opposers will have concerns regarding the class and might disagree with its components.
Although some people may believe that the class is questionable, there is an answer for
their concerns. For instance, the article, “Vaccines, Informed Consent, Effective Resource and
that informed consent is the general rule for any medical intervention and choice (Acosta, Juana
I., 2015). Requirement of vaccines in schools is not a violation of human rights because there are
still exemption forms that can be submitted. Thus, it is not unconstitutional to require the class
due to informed consent. Parents will still have the choice to vaccinate their children or not; the
class is just to educate them further on the topic and expand their knowledge so that they are not
As well, the American Publication Human Services Administration reports that the states
and the federal government share the cost of providing public insurance such as Medicaid and
that The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is entirely funded by the government
(Lower-Basch, E., 2017). The government already funds many medical-related programs that
benefit society, so this class would be funded federally as well. Families would not have to worry
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 8
about the costs of the class or the vaccinations. Lastly, an article in The Education and Society
journal mentions that in the 1960s, the federal government started pushing new achievement tests
designed to evaluate instructional methods and schools (Gershon, L., 2015). If the government
can require students to go to school and take tests to assess their knowledge, they can require
parents to take a class to improve their knowledge as well. This class will be treated the same as
if it were a child attending class. For example, if a child does not attend school, the parent will
receive a fine or even be charged with a misdemeanor. The same would go for the vaccination
class. A majority of the concerns parents might have about the class will be resolved federally.
There are other solutions that can resolve the issue of uneducated anti-vax parents, such
as more campaigning and media on the topic, but these are not as beneficial. There is not enough
being done to by healthcare providers that teach parents about vaccine safety. For example, a list
of negative side effects are sometimes given to parents before a vaccination. An article done by
Pediatrics discusses a study done on pregnant women and their decision on vaccinating their
infant. It reveals that information given against immunization was associated with delayed infant
immunization (Veerasingam, P., Grant, C. C., et al., 2017). Giving expecting parents a list of
negative side effects of a vaccine will only cause them to be skeptical or hesitant. Instead, this
class will provide proper data on vaccines that address the effectiveness and educate them
further.
Additionally, the American Association for the Advancement of Science presents a study
done on the effects of campaigning for the papillomavirus vaccine. The results state that the
campaign created a problem with conservative groups who wanted to oppose it and that it had
many unresolved issues (Kaiser, J., 2008). This study explains why campaigning for vaccines is
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 9
not effective. Campaigning only causes problems with the opposing side because these anti-
vaxxers feel attacked. Campaigns are primarily based on personal opinion and the evidence used
in them can be invalid. Having a solution that promotes vaccines solely using statistical evidence
is beneficial.
A study done in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the seasonal influenza vaccine was
discussed in the article, “Interim Estimates of 2018–19 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness
— United States, February 2019.” The results showed that there was a decrease of 40%–60% in
influenza cases across all ages and that approximately 80% of reported pediatric
influenza-associated deaths have occurred in children who were not vaccinated (Doyle JD,
Chung JR, Kim SS, et al., 2019). There is an abundance of evidence that prove vaccines to be
effective. This class will be beneficial in increasing vaccination numbers because there is very
little evidence suggesting that vaccines are unsafe. When parents take the class, they will
understand the effectiveness of vaccines, therefore making an educated decision rather than what
they have heard in the media. Requiring this class is more beneficial than what healthcare
providers are doing now and it is more effective than campaigns and media.
A mandatory class funded by the government is the best solution to resolve uneducated
decisions on vaccinations. Parents are choosing whether or not to vaccinate their children based
on stories in the media and are not receiving proper information from healthcare providers.
Although some people may have questions and concerns regarding this solution, a majority of
them will be resolved due to it being federally organized. Entailing a class that educates
expecting parents on vaccines will be highly effective and will lead to and increase of childhood
ANTI-VAX SOLUTIONS 10
vaccinations. All parents would be making educated decisions on vaccines if this law was in
motion.
References
https://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj131.vier
Bianco, A., Mascaro, V., Zucco, R., & Pavia, M. (2019). Parent perspectives on childhood
vaccination: How to deal with vaccine hesitancy and refusal? Vaccine,37( 7), 984-990.
doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.062
Cordrey, K., McLaughlin, L., Das, P., & Milanaik, R. (2018). Pediatric Resident Education and
327–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922817727465
Doyle JD, Chung JR, Kim SS, et al. (2019, February) Interim Estimates of 2018–19 Seasonal
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness — United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Gershon, L. (2015, May 12). A Short History of Standardized Tests | JSTOR Daily. Retrieved
from https://daily.jstor.org/short-history-standardized-tests/
Jiménez, Á V., Stubbersfield, J. M., & Tehrani, J. J. (2018). An experimental investigation into
the transmission of antivax attitudes using a fictional health controversy. Social Science &
Kaiser, J. (2008). LATIN AMERICA: Price Is the Main Barrier to Wider Use of Papillomavirus
Kriss, J. L., Frew, P. M., et al., (2017). Evaluation of two vaccine education interventions to
Lower-Basch, E. (2017, April 19). Improving Access, Cutting Red Tape - CLASP. Retrieved
https://clasp.org/sites/default/files/public/resources-and-publications/publication-1/Impro
ving-Access-Cutting-Red-Tape.pdf
Patricia A. Obulaney, Irene Gilliland & Holly Cassells (2016) Increasing Cervical Cancer and
10.1080/07370016.2016.1120595
Perkins, R. B., Brogly, S. B., Adams, W. G., & Freund, K. M. (2012). Correlates of Human
Pottinger HL, Jacobs ET, Haenchen SD, Ernst KC (2018) Parental attitudes and perceptions
Schwartz J. L. (2010). HPV vaccination's second act: promotion, competition, and compulsion.
Veerasingam, P., Grant, C. C., et al., (2017). Vaccine Education During Pregnancy and