DETAILS
CONTRIBUTORS
GET THIS BOOK TRB Executive Committee; Executive Office; Transportation Research Board;
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
SUGGESTED CITATION
Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get:
Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press.
(Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences.
CONTENTS
1
Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Critical Issues in Transportation 2019
CRITICAL ISSUES IN
TRANSPORTATION 2019
M
odern economies and lifestyles would aviation, and waterborne networks, with significant
not be possible without extensive implications for the delivery of goods and services,
transportation systems. Yet, even as personal travel, and the economy.
vital as they are, such systems mostly escape notice
In this edition of Critical Issues in Transportation,
except when they do not function as expected. As
the TRB Executive Committee poses a series of
the third decade of the 21st century approaches,
challenging questions about potential critical
however, expectations may well be turned upside
issues that may arise 10 to 20 years into the
down. Changes are coming at transportation from
future. These questions include interest in the
all directions, including potentially revolutionary
implications of developing trends that might
technologies such as drones and automated
not fully manifest until beyond this period.
vehicles, rapid innovations in urban transportation
The intent is to frame high-level questions that
services, unreliable funding for infrastructure and
can be addressed during the next 5 to 10 years
operations, and possible changes in national
through research, policy analysis, and debate
policies affecting trade, climate, environmental
to help society prepare for the potentially
protection, and sources of energy. The potential
unprecedented changes that lie ahead. The
consequences of these changes could make future
identified critical issues deserve attention
congestion, fuel consumption, and emissions
because of transportation’s central and essential
either markedly better or markedly worse.
role in serving individuals and society and the
Correspondingly, these potential changes could
many consequences it has, both favorable and not
positively or adversely affect commercial truck, rail,
important consequences for sustainability, system received has improved this report considerably.
performance, safety, equity, and goods movement. The selection and formulation of the topics and
Future settlement and development patterns issues, however, are based on the Executive
similarly affect future demand for infrastructure and Committee’s collective judgment and it assumes
energy, impacts on the environment, governance, sole responsibility for this document.
and funding. Funding has broad implications for
system performance, safety, goods movement, and
institutional and workforce capacity. Grouping the
issues into the 12 topic areas relies on judgment.
Transformational
More consequential than grouping the issues, Technologies and
however, are the choices of issues to address.
Services
The Executive Committee does not claim that
its list of topics and issues is comprehensive. The potential autonomous operation of vehicles,
Transportation is a broad field of human activity vessels, and aircraft has captured the public’s
that spans many disciplines and bodies of policy imagination, and understandably so. Despite a
analysis and research across both the private and considerable overdose of hype, automation may
public sectors. No single person, or even group one day revolutionize the movement of people and
of people, can claim to be fully cognizant of the goods.1 It will probably take longer to unfold than
importance, status, and direction of all of the the general media implies, but advances in sensors,
efforts under way affecting transportation. Rather, communication and information technologies,
this list highlights what the Executive Committee, artificial intelligence (AI), and entrepreneurial
based on extensive consultation and its own business models may be at such an important point
judgment, determines to be the key issues for the of inflection as to almost guarantee significant
transportation community, writ large, to address future changes and, hopefully, benefits. Advances
over the next few years. TRB’s Executive Committee in technology and entrepreneurship have already
will also draw on this document to select a limited brought substantial innovations in service through
number of priorities for TRB’s next strategic plan ride-, car-, and bike-sharing services2 and in the
with the goal of focusing TRB’s research, studies, logistics systems that make e-commerce able to
and activities on the most important transportation
issues facing the nation.
operate almost continuously, and not always improve safety during this transition period?
occupied. On the one hand, vehicle miles Which issues will need to be addressed
of travel, congestion, and emissions could to reduce risk when semiautomated and
potentially all be significantly reduced. automated vehicles operate in mixed traffic
On the other hand, automated vehicles with drivers of conventional vehicles? How
could result in more vehicle trips and allow does society approach managing public
commuters to live even farther from where opinion and expectations and regulating
they work, facilitating additional sprawl, semiautomated and automated technologies
which could also increase total travel, that may sometimes fail but nonetheless
congestion levels, and energy consumption. operate more safely than current vehicles?11
Which policy options can and should be d. Connected vehicles may arrive much sooner
exercised to achieve net social benefits from than automation. Their safety benefits will
automated vehicles? be enhanced if the public sector invests
c. Federal policy promotes connectivity among in adding sensors and communications
vehicles and with infrastructure (connected technologies to traffic signals, signs, and
vehicles) that would communicate with one other infrastructure. Public investment
another at a high bandwidth to enhance in infrastructure, however, occurs much
safety.9 Even as automakers begin to roll out more slowly than new technologies
connected vehicles, they are also offering enter the vehicle fleet. Indeed, the auto
semiautomated vehicles that can take industry is forging ahead with CAVs that
over the driving task in some applications. will have benefits independent of public
Many companies have promised to begin investment in smart infrastructure. How
offering fully automated vehicles in the near can the misalignment between investment
future. Assuming a likely gradual market by the public and private sectors be
penetration of automated vehicles,10 it overcome? What should be the highest
will take several decades before most of priorities for publicly funded connected
the automotive fleet is fully automated. vehicle infrastructure improvements? What
As a result, there will be a long time span are the potential roles for public–private
during which CAVs operate side by side with partnerships in accelerating the pace of
conventional driver-operated vehicles. How public investment? Another important factor
can the public sector foster technological for connected vehicles to move forward is
innovation and steer the transition to CAVs to resolving the current debate within industry
a. Many questions remain about how for a wide variety of reasons, such as the
transformational technologies will affect perceived degree of control, voluntary
travel behavior in the short term. How much exposure to risk, and familiarity.25 Society
will consumers value new products and implicitly recognizes public perceptions
services and how much will they be willing by requiring far less risk from flying on a
to pay for their safety, energy saving, and commercial flight than driving on a rural
emission reduction attributes? How will these highway. What level of risk will the public
technologies affect the number of trips, modal require of automated vehicles? How much
preferences, and willingness to pool rides?21 safer will they have to be than conventional
b. Consumer response to services offering vehicles to gain public acceptance?
automated vehicles with low operating
costs could reduce the need for automobile
ownership, and thereby, among Serving a Growing and
other effects, free up space for urban
redevelopment as such a large share of
Shifting Population
urban space is devoted to parking.22 How
Future population growth in the United States is
might transformational technologies affect
expected to average about 1 percent annually,
auto ownership? Will the other attributes of
with increases in highway vehicle miles of travel
auto ownership (flexibility, independence,
of similar magnitude,26 but past trends imply that
status) continue to outweigh the cost
this growth will not be even across the country.
advantages of using other modes? If auto
Included among these trends are population growth
ownership does diminish, how might
in several megaregions;27 regional migration,
requirements for parking diminish and what
particularly toward the Southeast, Mountain West,
opportunities exist to repurpose on- and off-
and West Coast; and population declines in rural
street parking for other uses?
areas across the country.28 (More recent counter
c. Over the long term, transformational
trends to growing urbanization in the largest metro
transportation technologies may affect
areas may suggest rebounding population growth in
where people and businesses choose to
medium size and smaller cities.29)
locate, in turn affecting consumption of
space, demand for infrastructure, energy
consumption, and emissions.23 Will
transformational technologies encourage
more or less low-density residential and
commercial location?
d. In response to some vehicle technologies
introduced to enhance safety, human
beings apparently drive in ways that can
negate some of their benefits; in the case
of antilock brakes, for example, long-term
evidence indicates no reduction in fatal
crashes.24 During the long transition period
of simultaneous operation of conventional
and semiautomated and automated vehicles,
how will drivers adapt to the safety features
of semiautomated safety technologies? How
will drivers of conventional vehicles respond
to CAVs that may operate more slowly and
cautiously?
e. The general public judges risks and behaves
accordingly differently than experts do
and speeding, and implement effective policies to semiautomated technologies even if they do
manage operator fatigue across all transportation increase distraction-related crashes?
modes. Additional important questions include 23. Transportation’s role in public health
how to reduce distractions to operators and is widespread, including the effects of
pedestrians and incorporate semiautonomous emissions,66 noise,67 and urban heat
driving technologies in ways that reduce rather islands;68 the spread of infectious diseases;69
than increase risk. The public health consequences and fatigue, stress, and chronic disease
of transportation emissions and noise and the among transportation operators.70 Access
consequences of chronic fatigue in 24-hour to public health facilities, particularly for
operations also demand greater understanding and the disabled, elderly, and economically
action. Once a world leader in highway safety, the disadvantaged, continues to be a challenge.
United States has become a laggard: accordingly, How can we develop a deeper appreciation
thousands, if not millions, are injured every year and management of public health outcomes
in crashes that could have been avoided. Averting related to transportation and promote healthier
these tragedies makes it all the more important approaches?
to understand the most effective highway safety 24. Pollution is a leading cause of disease
strategies being employed in other nations, as well and premature death, with the majority of
as in the safest U.S. jurisdictions, and building pollution-related deaths attributed to local
popular and political support to implement them.60 air pollution.71 People living or working near
roadway environments or near ports, rail
21. The public and private sectors have made great
yards, airports, and other transportation
strides in protecting vehicle occupants from
facilities appear to be at an increased risk
highway crashes. How can we accelerate the
from motor vehicle emissions.72 This increased
adoption of crash protection measures that
risk disproportionately affects lower-income
have been proven effective, such as air bags,
groups and minorities. Which mitigation
energy-absorbing materials, and safety belt
measures can be justified and implemented
use and helmet laws, as well as the adoption
and which need more research to reduce
of the safest road designs? What transferable
health risks for those living near major
lessons can be learned from those states and
transportation emission sources?
localities that have been successful in reducing
deaths and injuries through implementing
safety countermeasures that work? How can
we reverse the sharp decline in highway traffic
safety enforcement in some jurisdictions?
22. Many driver warnings and semiautomated
features being added to motor vehicles today
provide the opportunity to avoid crashes,61
but some may also increase unintended
overreliance on technologies.62 How can
semiautomated driving, which requires driver
vigilance even when relying on the vehicle to
steer and brake, be most effectively regulated
to address the risks of increased distraction
and inattentiveness?63 As ever more technology
is available and used by transportation
operators, how do we reduce the death and
injury resulting from related distractions,64
such as cellphone use by both vehicle
operators and pedestrians,65 or from erosion of
operator skills as reliance on semiautomation
grows? What are the net safety benefits of
waterways, and ports are also planned for, or is devolution affecting net infrastructure
provided, through thousands of special authorities. investment across all levels of government?
Added to this mix is the interdependence of the Cross-border coordination among states in
public and private sectors as private trucks, aircraft, planning and policy making is a major gap,
barges, and ships use public infrastructure for the particularly with regard to freight movements.
movement of people and freight and the growing Metropolitan areas that host major ocean
dependence on private companies to finance, build, ports and airports that serve international and
manage, and maintain public infrastructure. interstate commerce bear the brunt of local
noise and traffic caused by these facilities.
The transportation systems that support
What best practices can be put in place to
metropolitan areas and megaregions typically span
ensure effective and equitable treatment of
myriad jurisdictional lines, raising questions about
these cross-border externalities?
which level of government should be responsible
36. Major bottlenecks to traffic flows spanning
for, and what aspects of, network planning,
modes and jurisdictions are well known, but are
funding, and management are appropriate for these
particularly hard problems to solve. The Chicago
evolving and increasingly important geographies.
Region Environmental and Transportation
As metropolitan areas grow into megaregions
Efficiency (CREATE) program is an example of a
spanning multiple states, questions arise about
$30 billion-plus list of projects, far from funded,
institutional reform, as well as models of successful
that involve rail systems, highways, public
cross-agency cooperation,96 that facilitate
transportation, and multiple private carriers and
the establishment of integrated and efficient
public jurisdictions.97 The New York/New Jersey
transportation networks. The dependence of private
Gateway program,98 a critical node on the most
carriers on public infrastructure raises important
heavily trafficked passenger rail corridor in the
questions about the appropriate regulations to
country, is another example of an unfunded,
ensure that private carriers pay their fair share, have
high-cost local project that affects travel across
a level playing field for competition, and serve the
multiple states. How can financial, institutional,
public interest.
and competitive barriers be overcome to reduce
35. States and local governments are assuming nationally significant bottlenecks at large-scale,
greater responsibility for transportation services complex transportation facilities?
and infrastructure in response to a declining 37. Hundreds of metropolitan planning
federal role and reduced funding support. How organizations exist, but many are too limited
does this shift in the federal role and support in scope and scale to take on multimodal
affect state and local commitment to facilitating planning for transportation at the metropolitan-
interstate and international commerce? How wide or megaregion scale.99 As metropolitan
Flight delays add at least another $30 billion.107 greater priority on managing existing assets before
Although these costs may be overstated, ever- choosing to expand them or build new ones.
growing congestion indicates that the demand for
41. Technological innovation may make it possible
transportation infrastructure is outpacing supply
to move CAVs through existing networks
and imposing high costs on society. Limited
more efficiently at much shorter headways
opportunities and high costs to expand facilities
on narrowed lanes without harming safety,
in already congested areas will result in a greater
possibly even improving it. Pricing road use,
emphasis on maximizing the performance of the
as applied in new urban express lanes, is
existing transportation network. As travel volumes
providing some congestion relief as well as
continue to grow and funding remains highly
new funding for alternative modes. In the
constrained, state and local agencies are struggling
shorter term, corridor-level performance can
to add capacity and maintain the performance and
be enhanced through the use of technologies
condition of the nation’s infrastructure, the value of
that improve communication between
which is in the trillions of dollars.108
vehicles and infrastructure and provide
As part of squeezing more performance out better information for travelers about system
of existing assets, transportation officials are performance. How can officials responsible for
struggling to maintain the assets’ physical condition public infrastructure improve the performance
for as long as possible. Much better estimates are of the existing system of roads, public transit,
needed for the life-cycle performance of materials, airports, waterways, and ports? What types
infrastructure designs, and deployment strategies of tactics, data, vendor contracts, and tools
to develop better predictive models to guide will help? Would institutional reforms, such as
decision making. If analyses can account for local transferring air traffic control to an independent
conditions, traffic, materials, and weather, such public corporation or placing more highway
information could help maintenance managers and transit assets and operations under private
extend the expected life and life-cycle performance management, enhance system performance?
for highways, bridges, rail lines, ports, waterways, 42. Continued population growth in megaregions
and airports. Ongoing improvements in material and urban areas promises continued growth
performance, construction, and maintenance are all in travel. Adding capacity to all modes of
essential for improving the life-cycle performance transportation in growing urban areas faces
of new and existing assets. Equally important are many constraints, such as the high cost
questions about how public officials can place of developed land, protections against
network links, and they also raise equity concerns. fuel taxes to help fund the highway system,117
Charging for highway use by the mile can be done as did the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.118
efficiently and accurately because of advances in AAA has also endorsed a fuel tax increase to
technology, and might one day be a replacement pay for highways.119 Most states have raised
for motor fuel taxes, but the practice raises privacy their motor fuel taxes since 1993, the last
concerns that must be resolved.115 The U.S. economy time that federal fuel taxes were raised for
cannot function without its transportation networks, transportation.120 How can political support be
but paying for the public infrastructure it depends found for raising the federal motor fuel taxes
on raises many vexing questions and vigorous or introducing alternative user fees to provide
debate, and so far there is no consensus on how to public infrastructure that serves interstate
proceed at the national level. travel? What are the consequences of the trend
away from user-fee funding and how can states
45. Given declining federal support and the
and the nation as a whole steer toward more
growing share of capital funding by states and
efficient, effective, sustainable, and equitable
local governments, what can be done to better
forms of user-fee funding for transportation
articulate the rationale for federal funding
Renewing the National Commitment to services and systems in the future? How can
for transportation systems and services and
the Interstate Highway System funding be sustained for modes such as public
A Foundation for the Future how can the federal share be determined for
transportation and inland waterways that
facilities serving interstate travel and other
cannot rely wholly on user fees?
different contexts in which it might apply? What
47. The merits of motor fuel taxes as the main
are the most cost-effective, cost-beneficial, and
source of user fees weakens as vehicles
equitable ways to pay for the federal share of
become more fuel efficient and some
transportation?
alternatively fueled vehicles pay no fees at all
46. The majority of the public has consistently
for highway use. As vehicle energy efficiency
supported an increase in the motor fuel taxes
improves, resulting in less fuel tax revenue,
if the funds are dedicated to maintenance.116
and as alternatively fueled vehicles become
The motor carrier industry voiced support in
more common, further depleting revenue,
early 2018 for a 20 cent increase in motor
how can states and the federal government
respond? Can user fees be expanded and
extended? Can other, more promising funding
approaches be pursued? Mileage-based user
fees (MBUFs) could serve as a replacement
for, or supplement to, the fuel taxes relied
on for highway infrastructure,121 and multiple
pilot programs of this concept are under way
around the country. In concept, MBUFs could
be adjusted to charge premiums for driving
on congested roads during high-demand time
periods and base fees on vehicle fuel economy.
Barriers to feasibility include concerns about
the cybersecurity of billing records showing the
details of trips and administrative costs that
exceed those of motor fuel taxes. What version
of an MBUF best protects privacy, allocates
resources according to demand, minimizes
administrative expenses, and could gain public
and political acceptance?
Goods Movement
Our economy and lifestyles depend on an efficient
system for moving freight, both domestically and
internationally, and adequate public infrastructure
for the private carriers that must rely on it. After
completing the Interstate Highway System,
expanding airports and ports in response to
improved aviation and marine technologies,
and deregulating the freight sector, the United
States had a logistics and freight infrastructure
system without parallel. More recently, however,
rankings of U.S. logistics and freight infrastructure
systems show the United States lagging behind its
trading partners.122 Freight movement is expected
to continue to grow dramatically in the coming
decades to serve an expanding population and
growing economy.123 Without a resolution to funding
shortfalls for public infrastructure,124 however,
additional freight movements will increasingly
contribute to bottlenecks and capacity problems.
Growing expectations about the rapid delivery of carriers can do so safely and while reducing
goods ordered online and the need to solve the environmental harm, have become new sources of
complexities and costs of urban freight movements, concern and debate.
especially the “last mile” problem, are particularly
acute topics for the freight sector. Also pressing in 48. Growth in demand for goods movement in
light of labor shortages, especially in trucking, is excess of infrastructure supply will create
whether, how, and how quickly greater automation impediments to the efficient flow of goods
of freight movements can be accomplished safely to producers and consumers. Automation
and cost effectively.125 A growing public policy in freight may move ahead faster than in
challenge is how to reduce the freight sector’s large passenger transportation because of private
share of carbon emissions through technology, incentives and competitive pressures and may
alternative fuels, and overall improvements in increase throughput on existing corridors.
efficiency. Freight railroads and pipeline owners can be
expected to continue to invest in capacity in
Private companies deliver the goods that the public response to market signals. The ability of the
demands, but other than freight rail and pipelines, public sector to expand capacity as freight
which are almost exclusively private, other freight demand grows is less clear, particularly in
modes depend on public infrastructure—roads densely developed urban areas. How can
and highways, airports and airways, and ports, society provide adequate capacity for the
channels, and waterways. Determining whether anticipated volume of future freight in the most
private carriers are paying their fair share for cost effective and responsive way? How might
public infrastructure and the costs they impose, freight demand change in the future from such
as well as whether existing regulations provide varied influences as fundamental changes in
for a level playing field for modal competition, are trade policies to innovations in manufacturing
important and never-ending sources of debate such as three-dimensional (3D) printing?126 To
and controversy. Determining what the public the extent that automation can provide greater
role should be in helping private carriers make service on existing highway corridors, how
transformational changes in goods delivery through can regulators at the federal and state levels
new technologies and services, and how private respond most effectively to the potential that
fly packages to suburban and rural areas petroleum by rail raises many concerns to those
and robots that operate on urban streets communities exposed to such traffic. How can
and sidewalks. How can policy makers these issues be planned for and addressed?
anticipate, monitor, plan for, and regulate How can expanded domestic energy production
such potentially revolutionary changes? be distributed to consumers in a manner that
53. Trucks in the United States dominate best serves the public interest?133
freight logistics costs130 and move almost
three-quarters of the value of domestic and
international freight and about 60 percent of Institutional and
the total tonnage.131 The enormity of the trucking
industry has pervasive influences on national
Workforce Capacity
economic efficiency, modal competition, safety,
The ability of transportation agencies to address
and the environment. Regulation of the size and
the challenges highlighted in this report depends
weight of trucks may seem to be a mundane
heavily on the capabilities of their workforces.
subject, but it becomes vitally important
Local and state transportation agency staff are
when commercial interests press regularly
struggling to address transformational changes and
for increased truck sizes and weights at both
disruptions, but often without adequate financial
the state and national levels. Past analyses of
and technical resources to meet their needs.
proposed changes in truck size and weight have
Transportation funding for local and state agencies
foundered due to lack of both data and robust
has been tightly constrained in most jurisdictions
technical tools for estimating their impacts.132
for more than a decade. Moreover, as transportation
What evidence will inform decisions by public
systems become more technologically complex,
officials to make the substantial investments
the future workforce will need higher skill levels in
in the tools, models, and data required to
fields such as information technology (IT), as well
understand the ramifications of changes in
as diverse disciplinary perspectives, to address
truck size and weight regulations?
increasingly complex social and environmental
54. Ocean carriers continue to exert formidable
issues.
pressure on seaports and trade corridors to
keep pace with the economies of scale realized The challenge for all levels of government is how to
by megavessels that carry 20,000 containers or attract, train, and retain enough people with a broad
more. These vessels require deeper channels, and diverse set of needed skills when the wages
more efficient port terminals, and hinterland offered cannot match those of the private sector.134
intermodal capacity and connectivity to As agencies increasingly rely on private providers,
accommodate short-term surges in demand, another problem to address is how to ensure that
which in turn demands massive infrastructure public agency staff have the requisite skills to
funding. To what degree is this sustainable manage contractors. These familiar challenges are
and what should the public sector’s role be in becoming increasingly difficult to address given
reacting to these pressures from world trade the pace of technological change and the scale of
and shipping? climate change.
55. Despite the need to move away from fossil
56. Agencies at all levels are being pressed to
fuels, until more sustainable options are
address the challenges of growing and shifting
widely available, the nation will continue
population and transportation demand, rapid
to rely on fossil fuel sources, particularly
technological change, and climate change.
domestically produced petroleum and natural
Even as the problems become more complex,
gas. Moving petroleum by truck, as well as
the institutions themselves lack the resources
moving commodities to support fracking, can
and technical capacity to address them. A lack
do major damage to parts of the transportation
of expertise and skill is most acute in local
system that are aging or inadequate from a
governments, which rarely have the savvy to
structural or a capacity standpoint to handle the
negotiate with TNCs, the expertise to address
movements of these heavy products. Moving
the ramifications of climate change, or simply
the time to manage the more complex systems 58. Given the growing, shifting, and increasingly
required for the infrastructure to support diverse population of the United States,
connected vehicles (local governments are the perspectives of a variety of racial and
responsible for roughly 80% of the traffic signal ethnic communities are needed to inform
infrastructure required for such systems135). How transportation planning and decision making at
can local institutional capacity be enhanced to all levels. How can we best attract more students
address these tremendous challenges? and professionals from underrepresented racial
57. Funding shortfalls, the retirement of highly and ethnic groups to transportation?
experienced Baby Boomers and other staffing 59. The tremendous innovations resulting from
reductions, and the inability to offer the the broader application of IT and automation
wages demanded by high-skill workers are will also be disruptive to the workforce. What
placing increasing pressure on government are the likely impacts of transformational
agencies to develop and retain a highly capable technologies on transportation-related jobs
workforce. They are increasingly turning to over time136 and how can displaced workers
private providers for transportation goods and best be assisted in finding meaningful and
services and high-skill support services such rewarding work? What are the workforce
as IT. Contracting for services from the private challenges associated with the nascent phases
sector, however, requires a new and broader set of the adoption of automation in freight
of managerial and evaluative skills for public- transportation? How will the skills of pre-,
sector transportation planners, engineers, and post-, and phased-automation workforces
managers. How do we ensure that the public be maintained on parallel tracks in the
sector has the expertise and skills to negotiate intermediate term?
contracts and oversee contractors in ways
that best serve the public interest? Regulatory
workforces in agencies responsible for public Research and Innovation
safety and environmental protection will need
to be as educated, trained, and skilled as their Innovation has been the hallmark of the
industry counterparts in order to understand United States since its founding, driven by an
the implications of new technologies and entrepreneurial spirit and openness to disruptive
services and to avoid undue economic losses in change. Public investments in basic research have
protecting safety and the environment. How can long been recognized as providing substantial
public officials be better prepared and retained economic returns.137 These investments, coupled
to regulate, and provide oversight of, private with public investments in applied research and
providers of transportation vehicles and services? human capital development, intellectual property
protections, venture capital, and more, have created
a virtuous cycle of innovation that has driven the
U.S. economy forward for generations.138 Examples
abound today of transformative transportation
technologies and business models that build on
decades of public investments in basic research
that lead to breakthroughs in electronics, IT,
sensors, AI, and other areas.
Engineering, and Medicine, The National 28. Cromartie, J., Rural Areas Show Overall Population
Academies Press, Chapter Three, 2012. http:// Decline and Shifting Regional Patterns of
www.trb.org/main/blurbs/166563.aspx. Population Change. U.S. Department of
20. Smith, B.W. Automated Driving and Product Agriculture Economic Research Service,
Liability. Michigan State Law Review, Vol. September, 2017. https://www.ers.usda.gov/
1, 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ amber-waves/2017/september/rural-areas-
papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923240. See show-overall-population-decline-and-shifting-
also Glancy, D.J., R.W. Peterson, and K.F. regional-patterns-of-population-change.
Graham. NCHRP Legal Research Digest 69: A 29. Frey, W. U.S. Population Disperses to Suburbs,
Look at the Legal Environment for Driverless Exurbs, Rural Areas, and “Middle of the
Vehicles. Transportation Research Board, Country” Metros. The Brookings Institution,
Washington, D.C., 2016. https://www.nap. March 26, 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/
edu/catalog/23453. blog/the-avenue/2018/03/26/us-population-
21. Shaheen, S. Shared Mobility: The Potential of Ride disperses-to-suburbs-exurbs-rural-areas-
Hailing and Pooling, in Sperling et al., 2018. and-middle-of-the-country-metros/?utm_
22. Chapin, T., et al. Envisioning Florida’s Future: campaign=Metropolitan%20Policy%20
Transportation and Land Use in an Automated Program&utm_source=hs_email&utm_
Vehicle World. Florida State University, 2016. medium=email&utm_content=61738659.
https://fpdl.coss.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/ 30. Kolko, J. Neighborhood Data Show that U.S.
imported/storage/original/application/ Suburbanization Continues (Wonkish),
abfcc477779d0bc0ea825c8011011939.pdf. 2016. http://jedkolko.com/2016/03/25/
23. Heinrichs, D. Autonomous Driving and Land Use. neighborhood-data-show-that-u-s-
In Maurer et al. (eds.). Autonomous Driving: suburbanization-continues.
Technical, Legal, and Social Aspects. Springer- 31. Committee for the Study on the Relationships
Verlag GmBH, Berlin, 2016. Among Development Patterns, Vehicle Miles
24. Kahane, C., and J. Dang. The Long-Term Effect Traveled, and Energy Consumption. Special
of ABS in Passenger Cars and LTVs. National Report 298: Driving and the Built Environment:
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. The Effects of Compact Development on
Department of Transportation, 2009. https:// Motorized Travel, Energy Use, and CO2
crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ Emissions. Transportation Research Board,
ViewPublication/811182. Washington, D.C., 2009. https://www.nap.
25. Slovic, P. Perception of Risk. Science, Vol. edu/catalog/12747.
236, 1987. http://science.sciencemag.org/ 32. Nelson, A.C. Megaregion Projections 2015–2045
content/236/4799/280. with Transportation Policy Implications.
26. Polzin, S. Vehicle Miles Traveled Trends and Transportation Research Record, Journal of
Implications for the U.S. Interstate Highway the Transportation Research Board, No. 2645,
System. In, Committee for a Study of the 2017. https://trrjournalonline.trb.org/doi/
Future Interstate Highway System, Renewing abs/10.3141/2654-02.
the National Commitment to the Interstate 33. Nelson, 2017, p. 13.
Highway System: A Foundation for the Future, 34. Nelson, 2017, p. 13.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 35. Frey, 2018, Figure 2.
and Medicine, forthcoming. 36. Blumenberg, E., et al. Typecasting
27. Kotkin, J., and M. Schill. A Map of America’s Neighborhoods and Travelers: Analyzing
Future: Where Growth Will Be Over the the Geography of Travel Behavior Among
Next Decade. NewGeography, September Teens and Young Adults in the U.S. Institute
9, 2013. http://www.newgeography.com/ of Transportation Studies, University of
content/003914-a-map-of-americas-future- California, Los Angeles, Luskin School of
where-growth-will-be-over-the-next-decade. Public Affairs, 2015. https://www.lewis.ucla.
See also Y. Hagler. Defining U.S. Megaregions. edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/10/
America 2050, 2009. http://www. Geography-of-Youth-Travel_Final-
america2050.org/upload/2010/09/2050_ Report.pdf?mc_cid=68d255b9a1&mc_
Defining_US_Megaregions.pdf. See also eid=c362ec69d8.
Nelson, G.D., and A. Rae. An Economic 37. Building for Boomers: Housing Preferences of
Geography of the United States: From the Boomer Generation. http://newsletter.
Commutes to Megaregions. PLoS ONE, rismedia.com/news/view/85545.
Vol. 11, No. 11, 2016. http://journals.plos. 38. Committee on Atmospheric Stabilization
org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. Targets for Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases
pone.0166083. Concentrations. Climate Stabilization Targets:
Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts over
Decades to Millennia. National Academies
Factors in Motor Carrier Safety and Driver 84. Brown, A., and B. Taylor. Bridging the Gap
Health, 2016. Between Mobility Haves and Have Nots. In
75. Aerospace Forecast Report Fiscal Years 2017 Sperling et al., 2018.
to 2037. Federal Aviation Administration, 85. Brown, A., and B. Taylor, 2018.
U.S. Department of Transportation, 86. Polzin and Pisarksi, 2013.
2017. https://www.faa.gov/news/ 87. Bialik, K. Seven Facts About Americans
updates/?newsId=87746&cid=TW502. with Disabilities. Pew Research Center,
76. Hawkins, A.J. The Kitty Hawk Flyer Is Your 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-
Own Personal Electric Aircraft. The tank/2017/07/27/7-facts-about-americans-
Verge, 2018. https://www.theverge. with-disabilities.
com/2018/6/9/17438012/kitty-hawk-flying- 88. Vespa, J., D. Armstrong, and L. Medina.
flying-car-vtol-larry-page. Demographic Turning Points for the United
77. See remarks of C. Tomlin as summarized in States: Population Projections for 2020 to
S. Olson (ed.), Autonomy on Land and Sea 2060. Current Population Reports. U.S. Census
and in the Air and Space: Proceedings of a Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2018.
Forum. National Academy of Engineering, The https://www.census.gov/content/dam/
National Academies Press, 2018. https:// Census/library/publications/2018/demo/
www.nap.edu/catalog/25168. P25_1144.pdf.
78. Committee for a Study of Performance Based 89. Smith, A. Record Shares of Americans Now
Safety Regulation. TRB Special Report 324: Own Smartphones, Have Home Broadband.
Designing Safety Regulation for High-Hazard Pew Research Center, 2017. http://www.
Industries. Transportation Research Board, pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/12/
Washington, D.C., 2017. https://www.nap. evolution-of-technology.
edu/catalog/24907. 90. National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked
79. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Crashes Households. Federal Deposit Insurance
Rise in First States to Begin Legalized Corporation, 2015. https://www.fdic.gov/
Retail Sales of Recreational Marijuana. householdsurvey.
2018. https://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/ 91. Brown and Taylor, 2018.
desktopnews/crashes-rise-in-first-states-to- 92. Committee for Review of Innovative Urban
begin-legalized-retail-sales-of-recreational- Mobility Services, 2016, pp. 134–137.
marijuana. 93. Kim, S.J., and R. Puentes. Taxing New Mobility
80. Compton, R. Marijuana-Impaired Driving—A Services: What’s Right? What’s Next? Eno
Report to Congress. DOT HS 812 440. National Brief, 2018. https://www.enotrans.org/
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. etl-material/eno-brief-taxing-new-mobility-
Department of Transportation, 2017. https:// services-whats-right-whats-next.
www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/ 94. Kneebone, E. The Changing Geography of U.S.
documents/812440-marijuana-impaired- Poverty. The Brookings Institution, 2017.
driving-report-to-congress.pdf. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/the-
81. Hu, W., and J.B. Cicchino. An Examination of changing-geography-of-us-poverty. See also
the Increase in Pedestrian Motor Vehicle Brown and Taylor, 2018.
Crash Fatalities during 2009–16. Insurance 95. Committee on Equity Implications of Evolving
Institute for Highway Safety, May 2018. http:// Transportation Finance Mechanisms. Special
www.iihs.org/frontend/iihs/documents/ Report 303: Equity of Evolving Transportation
masterfiledocs.ashx?id=2160. Finance Mechanisms. Transportation Research
82. Semega, J.L., K.R. Fontenot, and M.A. Kollar. Board, Washington, D.C., 2011. https://www.
Income and Poverty in the United States: 2016. nap.edu/catalog/13240.
Current Population Reports. U.S. Census Bureau, 96. Innes, J.E., D.E. Booher, and S. Di Vittorio.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 2017. https:// Strategies for Megaregion Governance:
www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/ Collaborative Dialogue, Networks, and
publications/2017/demo/P60-259.pdf. Self Organization. Working Paper 2010-03.
83. Polzin, S., and A. Pisarksi. Brief 7: Vehicle and University of California, Berkeley, Institute
Transit Availability. In Commuting in America of Urban and Regional Development, 2010.
2013: The National Report on Commuting https://iurd.berkeley.edu/wp/2010-03.pdf.
Patterns and Trends. American Association of 97. Chicago Region Environmental and
State Highway and Transportation Officials, Transportation Efficiency Program. http://
Washington, D.C., 2013. http://traveltrends. www.createprogram.org/about.htm.
transportation.org/Documents/B7_ 98. The Gateway Program Development Corporation.
Vehicle%20and%20Transit%20Availability_ http://www.gatewayprogram.org.
CA07-4_web.pdf. 99. Nelson, 2017.
100. Committee for a Study of Intercity Passenger repeated over time to random samples,
Travel Issues and Opportunities in Short-Haul see Agrawal, A.W., and H. Nixon. What Do
Markets. Special Report 230: Interregional Americans Think About Federal Tax Options to
Travel: A New Perspective for Policy Making. Support Public Transit, Highways, and Local
Transportation Research Board, Washington, Streets and Roads? Results from Year Nine
D.C., 2017. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/ of a National Survey. Mineta Transportation
21887. Institute, 2018. https://transweb.sjsu.edu/
101. Jittrapirom, P., et al. Mobility as a Service: A research/1828-Survey-Transportation-Tax-Year-
Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments Nine. See also Zmud, J., and C. Arce. NCHRP
of Schemes, and Key Challenges. Urban Synthesis 377: Compilation of Public Opinion
Planning, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017. https://www. Data on Tolls and Road Pricing. Transportation
cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/ Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
view/931/931. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/14151.
102. Committee for Review of Innovative Urban 111. Committee for a Study of Air Traffic Controller
Mobility Services, 2016, p. 165. Staffing. Special Report 314: The Federal
103. Cuddy, M., et al. The Smart/Connected City and Aviation Administration’s Approach for
Its Implications for Connected Transportation. Determining Future Air Traffic Controller
White Paper FHWA JPO-14-148. John A. Volpe Staffing Needs. Transportation Research
National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Board, Washington, D.C., 2014, Ch. 6. https://
Department of Transportation, Cambridge, www.nap.edu/catalog/18824.
Mass., 2014. https://www.its.dot.gov/ 112. Committee on Reinvesting in Inland Waterways.
itspac/Dec2014/Smart_Connected_City_ Special Report 315: Funding and Managing the
FINAL_111314.pdf. U.S. Inland Waterways System. Transportation
104. Committee for the Review of Innovative Urban Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
Mobility Services, 2016, pp. 165–166. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21763.
105. INRIX Traffic Scorecard–U.S., 2016. http://inrix. 113. Committee for the Study on the Long-Term
com/resources/inrix-2016-traffic-scorecard- Viability of Fuel Taxes for Transportation.
us. See also Cortwright, J. Yet Another Flawed Special Report 285: The Fuel Tax and
Congestion Report from INRIX. http:// Alternatives for Transportation Funding.
cityobservatory.org/yet-another-flawed- Transportation Research Board, Washington,
congestion-report-from-inrix. D.C., 2006. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/
106. Hooper, A. Cost of Congestion to the Trucking 11568.
Industry: 2018 Update. American Transportation 114. Committee on Equity Implications of Evolving
Research Institute, Atlanta, Ga., 2018. http:// Transportation Finance Mechanisms, 2011.
atri-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ 115. Agrawal, A.W., H. Nixon, and A. Hooper. NCHRP
ATRI-Cost-of-Congestion-to-the-Trucking-Industry- Program Synthesis 487: Public Perception
2018-Update-10-2018.pdf. of Mileage-Based User Fees. Transportation
107. Ball, M., et al. Total Delay Impact Study: A Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016.
Comprehensive Assessment of the Cost and https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23401.
Impacts of Flight Delay in the United States. 116. Agrawal and Nixon, 2018.
National Center of Excellence for Aviation 117. American Trucking Associations. America’s
Operations Research, 2010. https://www. Truckers Challenge Policymakers to Support
isr.umd.edu/NEXTOR/pubs/TDI_Report_ Bold Infrastructure Plan, 2018. http://www.
Final_10_18_10_V3.pdf. trucking.org/article/America%E2%80%99s-
108. Value of and Investment in Transportation Truckers-Challenge-Policymakers-to-Support-
Infrastructure and Other Assets. Bureau of Bold-Infrastructure-Plan.
Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of 118. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Modernizing
Transportation, 2017, Ch. 8. https://www.bts. America’s Infrastructure Requires Adjusting the
gov/browse-statistical-products-and-data/ Federal Motor Vehicle User Fee, 2018. https://
transportation-economic-trends/tet-2017- www.uschamber.com/issue-brief/modernizing-
chapter-8-value-and. america-s-infrastructure-requires-adjusting-the-
109. National Surface Transportation Policy and federal-motor-vehicle-user.
Revenue Commission. Transportation for 119. AAA. AAA, ATA, and U.S. Chamber Ask Congress
Tomorrow. Report to Congress, 2007. https:// to Fund Roads and Bridges, 2015. https://
rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/18125. newsroom.aaa.com/tag/gas-tax.
110. Various surveys of public opinion about fuel 120. Davis, C. Most States Have Raised Gas Taxes
taxes and other user fees report different in Recent Years. Institute on Taxation and
results depending on how questions are Economic Policy, 2018. https://itep.org/most-
framed and sampling techniques. For a states-have-raised-gas-taxes-in-recent-years.
particularly well framed set of questions,
121. Paying Our Way: A New Framework for Department of Transportation, Washington,
Transportation Finance. National D.C., 2017. https://www.bts.gov/sites/bts.dot.
Surface Transportation Infrastructure gov/files/docs/FFF_2017.pdf.
Financing Commission, 2009. https:// 132. Committee for the Review of the U.S.
financecommission.dot.gov. Department of Transportation Truck Size
122. See the World Bank Logistics Performance Index. and Weight Study. Review of U.S. DOT Truck
https://lpi.worldbank.org. See also, The Global Size and Weight Study—Second Report:
Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. The World Review of USDOT Technical Reports. National
Economic Forum, 2016, Table 2. http://www3. Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/ Medicine, The National Academies Press,
TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2016-2017_ Washington, D.C., 2015. https://www.nap.
FINAL.pdf. edu/catalog/22092. See also Truck Size and
123. Freight Shipments Projected to Continue to Weight Limits Research Plan Committee.
Grow. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research to Support Evaluation of Truck Size
U.S. Department of Transportation. https:// and Weight Regulations. National Academies
www.transportation.gov/connections/ of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The
freight-shipments-projected-continue-grow. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.,
See also Freight Analysis Framework. Federal forthcoming.
Highway Administration, U.S. Department of 133. For a discussion of safety issues in transporting
Transportation. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/ hazardous materials, see Committee for
freight/freight_analysis/faf. a Study of Domestic Transportation of
124. Committee for the Study on Funding Options Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Ethanol. Special
for Freight Transportation Projects of National Report 325: Safely Transporting Hazardous
Significance. Special Report 297: Funding Liquids and Gases in a Changing U.S. Energy
Options for Freight Transportation Projects. Landscape. Transportation Research Board,
Transportation Research Board, Washington, Washington, D.C., 2018. https://www.nap.
D.C., 2009. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/ edu/catalog/24923.
24702. 134. Committee on Future Surface Transportation
125. Groshen, E., et al. Preparing U.S. Workers and Agency Human Resource Needs. Special
Employers for an Autonomous Vehicle Future. Report 275: The Workforce Challenge:
Prepared for Securing America’s Future Energy, Recruiting, Training, and Retaining Qualified
2018. https://avworkforce.secureenergy.org/ Workers for Transportation and Transit
wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Groshen-et-al- Agencies. Transportation Research Board,
Report-June-2018-1.pdf. See also Autor, D.H. Washington, D.C., 2003. https://www.nap.
Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History edu/catalog/10764.
and Future of Workforce Automation. Journal 135. Federal Highway Administration. Regional Traffic
of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2015. Signal Operations Programs: An Overview.
https://economics.mit.edu/files/11563. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
126. McKinnon, A.C. The Possible Impact of 3D https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/
printing and Drones on Last-Mile Logistics: An fhwahop09007/index.htm.
Exploratory Study. Built Environment, Vol. 42, 136. See Groshen et al., 2018, and Autor, 2015.
No. 4, 2016. 137. Salter, A.J., and B.R. Martin. The Economic
127. Holguín-Veras, J., et al. Direct Impacts of Off- Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research:
Hour Deliveries on Urban Freight Emissions. A Critical Review. Research Policy, Vol. 30,
Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 61, Part A, No. 3, 2001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
pp. 84–103, 2018. science/article/pii/S0048733300000913.
128. Groshen et al., 2018, and Autor, 2015. 138. Atkinson, R. Understanding the U.S. National
129. Ward, A., et al. 2018 State of Logistics Report— Innovation System. The Information
Steep Grade Ahead. A.T. Kearney, Chicago, Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2014.
Ill., 2018. https://www.atkearney.com/ http://www2.itif.org/2014-understanding-us-
transportation-travel/state-of-logistics-report. innovation-system.pdf.
See also Ward, A., et al, 2018, as cited by Council 139. Downs, A. Inside Bureaucracy. Little, Brown and
of Supply Chain Management Professionals. Company. Boston, Mass., 1967.
https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Footer/Press_ 140. Cummings, M. The Brave New World of Driverless
Release/CSCMP_Unveils_the_29th_Annual_ Cars: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research
State_of_Logistics_Report.aspx. and Workforce Development. TR News, No 308,
130. Ward et al., 2018. March–April 2017. https://hal.pratt.duke.edu/
131. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Freight Facts sites/hal.pratt.duke.edu/files/u24/TRN_308_
and Figures 2017. Tables 2-1 and 2-2, U.S. Cummings_%20pp34-37%20web.pdf.