Samantha Goldberg
Article Review
The article, More Than One Way: Stories of UDL and Inclusive Classrooms by Alisa K.
Lowrey; Aleksandra Hollingshead; Kathy Howery; and John B. Bishop outlines the effects of
using Universal Design for Learning in an inclusion classroom. Universal Design for learning
was researched to help teachers engage, teach, and assess their students effectively. Universal
Design for Learning has changed the way teachers teach and students learn. The authors of this
article researched the effects of Universal Design for learning in inclusive classrooms with
Intellectual disabilities are defined under the Individual with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA) as, “Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently [at
the same time] with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental
period, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance” (226). Before the research
began, the authors examined a well-documented study of Universal Design for Learning in two
inclusive classrooms that had students with intellectual disabilities. The study lasted a year and
found that student engagement increased, goals became more academically focused, student
responsibility improved and so on. This study was done by Dymond et al. The writers of More
Than One Way: Stories of UDL and Inclusive Classrooms used the previously mentioned study
The method for this study had the researchers examine the narratives of current teachers
using narrative inquiry. Each participant in the study had to meet specific criteria. All of the
participants in the study are general education teachers that have been working with Universal
Goldberg 2
Design for Learning for at least one year. Initially, the researchers wanted to find teachers who
had at least one student with a severe intellectual disability, However, after looking for
candidates, they decided to broaden their search to include those with a moderate intellectual
disability. They ended up with seven participants. There were four candidates from Canada and
three from the United States. Each candidate was interviewed over the phone for an average of
35 minutes. When they analyzed their data, they found common themes among the participants.
They combined the themes into their final findings. They organized their findings into four
categories: designing for learner variability, inclusion, teaming fosters success, and differing
descriptions of UDL.
Through their interviews, they found the teachers had similar thoughts about UDL. The
first finding was designing for learner variability. The teachers found that they had to address the
needs of various students by overcoming barriers. Teachers need to have multiple ways to assess
students and design their instruction with diversity in mind. They also found that inclusion
played a big role in the teacher interviews. By planning for the inclusion of students with
intellectual disabilities the teachers saw a positive increase in peer relationships. They also found
that teacher relationships were critical in the successful implementation of UDL. Having a
support system is so important if schools want to keep using UDL. Finally, they found that the
wording used in the classroom is different than the wording used in the research. Researchers
define UDL differently than the way it is spoken about in the classroom. Because of this many
people often don’t realize they are already implementing many strategies of UDL.
Using Universal Design for Learning is important in all classroom settings, even in
college. Having background knowledge in UDL, Cassidy and I decided to implement it into our
presentation. While working on our presentation we made sure to have strategies in place for
Goldberg 3
how we were going to represent information, engage the class, and allow for action and
expression.
We started by thinking about how we would present the information we studied. Our
foundation is a PowerPoint. PowerPoints are helpful for visual learners. PowerPoints can also be
posted online for students to use for future reference. From there we decided to put a video into
the presentation for our auditory learners. Videos are also useful for students with visual
impairments or students who struggle with reading. While watching the video, we will use closed
captioning for students who may have a hearing impairment. We don’t want our audience to be
bored by our presentation, so we had to come up with strategies to engage them. We knew we
wanted to include movement, so we came up with an idea for a true or false opener. On one side
of the room, we will have the word true posted on the wall, on the other side will be the word
false. The whole class will stand up while we ask a question. If the answer is true, they will move
to the true side and if it is false, they will move to the false side. Aside from engaging our
audience, this activity will help us to informally assess their background knowledge. Our action
and expression piece of UDL is combined with some engagement activities. About halfway
through our presentation, we will ask for student input. To do so we will give them a discussion
question. Then, we will ask them to turn to their neighbor and share their responses. After they
have shared with the person next to them, we will ask if anybody would like to share their
answer with the rest of the class. This strategy gets all students engaged and answering questions
without the pressure of being wrong in front of everybody. This will help get our class introverts
involved in the discussion. To close our presentation, we have another discussion question ready.
This time the students will be asked to write their question down on a sticky note and place it on
the board. This is another way to get shy learners comfortable answering questions. By doing
Goldberg 4
this we will have collected data from the class to assess their knowledge. By using a wide variety
of strategies during our presentation, Cassidy and I are confident that the majority of the class
will have a better understanding of how UDL is used in the inclusion classroom.
Works Cited
Lowrey, K. A., Hollingshead, A., Howery, K., & Bishop, J. B. (2017). More than One Way: Stories
of UDL and Inclusive Classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe
http://libproxy.gmercyu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di
rect=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1160598&site=ehost-live